Even many of the well-meaning, intelligent, and leading citizens of open countries where debate is unhindered, and opinions may be expressed freely have lacked the perspicacity to see through the finely woven veil of the Soviet spider.
Last February 15 Havana’s communist government thanked the Russian government for donating 25,000 tons of wheat to Cuba. Foreign Trade Minister Ana Teresita Gonzalez spoke of “the many actions of this type” carried out by Moscow.[iii] For example, in April 2022, the Russian government donated nearly 20,000 tons of wheat to communist Cuba.[iv] Meanwhile, communist North Korea has been hiding its ammunition shipments to Russia, in support of Putin’s war in Ukraine.[v] Even more curious, Russia is aligned with communist Vietnam,[vi] has sent troops to Venezuela in support of communist dictator Nicolás Maduro,[vii] has been invited by another communist dictator, Daniel Ortega, to send troops to Nicaragua,[viii] and has conducted joint military exercises with South Africa (where the ruling ANC has long been a front for the Communist Party of South Africa).[ix] Even more significant, however, is the emerging alliance between Russia and communist China. Shortly before Russia launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine, communist China made a joint declaration with Russia about a “new era” under a new global order. In effect, the world’s most populous communist country has aligned itself with the Russian Federation, a country that supposedly laid aside its communist system in December 1991 in favor of market reforms and democracy. Yet in the end, President Vladimir Putin of Russia and Xi Jinping of China, both say that the friendship between their two countries “has no limits.”[x]
According to reports, during the most difficult period of the Sino-US trade war, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) considered the use of viral weapons to disrupt the United States.
The Soviet Party fell apart because no one had the balls to keep it together.
Xi Jinping, to CCP leaders in 2012
President Donald Trump’s push-back against China’s exploitive trade practices from 2017-2019 was not acceptable to Beijing. Trump upset China’s play for economic dominance. Look what followed: — a global pandemic out of China, lockdowns of citizens, an experimental vaccine pushed on hundreds of millions of people, Western markets crashing, countries paralyzed with fear, massive economic dislocations, banks ready to fail, free societies turning to government controls, medical “martial law,” and a Russian invasion of Ukraine. All these events must be seen in context, as part of a sequence. It is a sequence best understood with reference to the defector literature (and testimony) of Anatoliy Golitsyn, Jan Sejna, Viktor Suvorov, and Stanislav Lunev. The main point of these authors is that Russia did not undergo a fundamental change after the fall of the Soviet Union. Golitsyn and Sejna refered to a “long range” communist bloc plan for collapsing the Warsaw Pact. Golitsyn, as well as Lunev, said that Russia and China were in a solid, long-term alliance that was kept hidden from the West. At some future date, the plan was, that Russia and China would confront the West. And that is what is happening now.
In March  we saw 84% excess mortality into Fall 2021, and though we already knew our analysis was solid, here it was verified by SOA [Society of Actuaries Research Institute]. It is undeniably clear that an event occurred in the Third Quarter of 2021, the same period that vaccine mandates were ordered by the Biden Administration, and enforced by corporate America.
Our food, drug, and cosmetic industries are all likely sabotage victims. The production processes of all are vulnerable to the introduction of chemical and biological agents, and the resultant contaminated products could be widely distributed.”
A statistical anomaly was discovered in 2021, after the United States began mass vaccinations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. People began to die from “cause unknown.” Of course, an intelligent observer might guess the cause. German-based scientists Karina Reiss and Sucharit Bhakdi, writing in 2020, said, “Experts around the world express their concerns and warn of rushed COVID-19 vaccines without sufficient safety guarantees.” With regard to the proposed mRNA vaccines, Reiss and Bhakdi wrote, “No gene-based vaccine has ever received approval for human use, and the present coronavirus vaccines have not undergone preclinical testing as is normally required by international regulations.” What a perfect situation, from the perspective of Brig. Gen. Rothschild’s admonition, for an enemy to introduce a contaminant – a “secret sauce,” if you will – into an already inadvisable product that is being pushed into everyone’s arm. If harm is done, guess who will be blamed?
There is no underestimating the bad judgment of today’s world leaders. In the case of Europe, Reiss and Bhakdi found officialdom’s ready embrace of mRNA vaccines inexplicable. “Germany,” they noted, “a country whose populous widely rejects genetic manipulation of food and opposes animal experiments, now stands at the forefront of these genetic experiments on humans. Laws and safety regulations have been bypassed in a manner that would, under normal circumstances, never be possible.”What could be a better opportunity for an attacker?
Of course, the mainstream press and the vaccine manufacturers have assured the public that mRNA technology will not modify the gene sequence of human subjects; yet, according to NCI/CCR Senior Investigator Shalini Oberdoerffer, “a novel mRNA modification may impact the human genetic code.” In fact, she says, “There are more than one hundred ways an RNA molecule can be chemically modified after it is synthesized” and the “functions of many of these modifications … are largely unknown.” [Italics added.] Imagine the leeway one might have in sabotaging such a product. Oberdoerffer’s research indicates that the enzyme responsible for the mRNA modification of gene activity has “been previously implicated in cancer and aging.” Here it is not really a question of changing the DNA of a cell, though unexpected changes might take place. It is a question of changing the delicate balance of cell protein production in a way that might prove fatal, over time, to an injected individual – accidentally or on purpose. What unexpected consequences might there be once we inject a person’s cells with mRNA by way of lipid nanoparticles? Since when has it been safe for man to tinker with something that only God understands? Given the complexities, I believe we have been playing with fire – in more than one dimension at once.
It was grossly irresponsible to vaccinate roughly 700 million people in the NATO countries with an experimental mRNA technology that may have adverse side-effects. Hundreds of millions were, in the end, manipulated or pushed into taking this treatment. All the while, pharmaceutical companies were shielded from accountability even as they brokered deals with China (a country which should have never been allowed into our vaccine and medicine supply chain). One foolish choice was laid upon another. But who cultivates the virtue of prudence nowadays? The many politicians who backed this mad gamble, in turn, were advised by notoriously incompetent “science” bureaucrats. Given the inherently totalitarian nature of bureaucratized science, and given the readiness to make these bureaucrats into gods, we may ask: – will anyone be held responsible for vaccine deaths?
For decades bureaucrats have claimed to represent science. Some bureaucrats, like Anthony Fauci, have dared to impersonate science (as if science were a person). Such characters, imbedded in the science bureaucracies of the West, have promoted notions like man-made global warming, suggesting that we can control the Earth’s climate by choking off humanity’s gas and oil (i.e., evil carbon). They have blasted us with false predictions of rising oceans and flooded coastlines for years. And now, thinking themselves the saviors of mankind, they have injected 700 million people, in the NATO countries, with something that is truly experimental. In fact, mRNA technology has not been around long enough to guess at the potential long-term effects of injecting children. We know, already, that there have been disastrous short-term effects. While the health bureaucrats attack mRNA vaccine critics as disinformation super-spreaders, statistics based on VAERS data are beginning to tell a different story.
Why did these scientific bureaucrats advise presidents and prime ministers across the Western world to use an mRNA therapy to stop the COVID-19 pandemic? Why would they embark on such a dangerous and unethical course? The answer is that such bureaucrats have always been dangerous. They combine two dangerous elements: Big Government and Big Science. If it could, the latter would make guinea pigs of us all.
It is probable that mRNA vaccines are only the beginning, only a first step. Watch and see if the “owners” of our bodies – the bureaucrats – start pushing actual gene therapies on us. The first gene therapy was licensed in China in 2003. Gene therapy modifies an individual’s genes to treat a disease (as mRNA is said to modify the body’s protein production). Gene therapy is a dangerous and questionable procedure under the best of circumstances. The first human patient treated in a gene therapy trial was 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger, who suffered from a genetic disease of the liver. Gelsinger had a mild form of the disease; consequently, he was able to survive with medicine and dietary restrictions. Under the auspices of the University of Pennsylvania, on 13 September 1999, Gelsinger was injected with an adenoviral vector carrying a corrected gene. He died four days later from “a massive immune response triggered by the use of the viral vector to transport the gene into his cells….” Not surprisingly, an FDA investigation into Gelsinger’s death showed that the scientists running the trial had violated several rules of conduct: (1) Gelsinger’s ammonia levels were too high for a safe trial; (2) the university failed to report serious side effects experienced by earlier patients; (3) the scientists failed to disclose that monkeys had died when given this same treatment.
The Jesse Gelsinger story does not paint a pretty picture of our scientists. Extend this scenario, once again, to 700 million people in the Western world. And yes, I know, mRNA therapy is not gene therapy, as noted earlier. Nonetheless, the mRNA vaccines belong to the same family of treatments as gene therapies. Basically, you inject a cell with a different set of instructions than the God-give ones. Again, I ask the question: What are the long-term consequences?
More than thirty years ago the first gene therapy trials were run on animals. The results were not promising. The animals suffered from toxicity, inflammation, and cancer. (Sound familiar?) Scientists have tried to find ways to avoid these dangerous effects. According to the Genetic Learning Center, “Despite the best efforts of researchers around the world … gene therapy has seen only limited success.” The reason for this? “Gene therapy poses one of the greatest technical challenges in modern medicine. It is very hard to introduce new genes into cells of the body and keep them working.”
Science, however, has become a kind of religion for many people – a religion that believes man has become a kind of god. This religion says that man has the right to change his maker’s design (i.e., transhumanism) – that man has a duty, in fact, to “improve” his own genetic code. Here we run into an ethical problem, and a philosophical problem. As one authority has stated regarding “germline” gene therapy, “The idea of these germline alterations is controversial. While it could spare future generations in a family from having a particular genetic disorder, it might affect the development of a fetus in unexpected ways or have long-term side effects that are not yet known.”
These technologies are inherently dangerous. Many scientists are excited by all of this, especially our social engineers and their allies, the Big Science bureaucrats. As ever, they would like to redesign the human race. This is a house built on a totalitarian foundation – with the same “man-is-God” philosophy that brought us the horrors of the Holocaust, the gulag and the Laogai. If the state is the “coldest of all cold monsters,” as Nietzsche suggested, science makes the state even colder.
In a January 2019 article for the Harvard Gazette, we read that, “Medicine is … on the cusp of major change as disruptive technologies such as gene, RNA, and cell therapies enable scientists to approach diseases in new ways.” George Q. Daley, a leader in stem cell research, has warned, “You can’t control rogue scientists in any field.” And as it happens, in communist China, experimenting on human beings has already taken a terrifying turn; for it was Professor He Jiankiu who told the world in November 2018 that he had edited the genes of twin girl embryos to grant them HIV immunity; and those twins were brought to term. Here were the first genetically edited human babies. Of course, the scientific world was initially thrilled by this “achievement.” On closer examination, however, the “achievement” was called into question. The informed consent of the parents may not have been obtained. And in 2022 Chinese scientists spoke of the need to build a special care facility for the children, acknowledging that errors may have occurred in the gene editing process.
Imagine you are a person born into the world as a genetic experiment. Would you say, as did Frankenstein’s monster to Frankenstein, “I ought to be thy Adam”? If this does not leave us shuddering in horror, then there is something broken in us. Many scientists were awakened from their ethical slumbers by the shocking callousness of Professor He Jiankiu and his CCP sponsors. Developmental biologist Kathy Niakan of the Francis Crick Institute commented, “If true … this would be a highly irresponsible, unethical and dangerous use of genome editing technology.”
Imagine a vast hive of tedious mediocrities with huge agencies under them, and even larger egos. In this context, what is the social pathology of a “health bureaucrat”? Is it in their fraudulent claims and ludicrous posturing, or is it in their administrative titles and self-serving rationalizations? Are they creatures of image or of substance? Are they atheists who ideologically seek God’s office? And which of them is equal to scientific discovery? What sort of moral compass guides them? And what scientist, eager to make significant discoveries, aspires to a bureaucratic station?
To state the problem bluntly, modern bureaucracies are unlikely to do ethical science, because high-level bureaucrats are motivated by power. From the atom bomb to the manipulation of the human genome, we have put Nimrod and his Tower of Babel into the shade. And it has all been done through bureaucracies. Furthermore, since bureaucrats are seldom held accountable, it is doubtful that rogue scientists working under ambitious bureaucrats have any real sense of responsibility (the kind that is spiritually felt). Once science itself has been sufficiently corrupted, the bureaucrat who is himself incapable of scientific discovery will be compelled to pseudo-scientific fakery. Here is where the whole thing crashes and burns. To stand before the public, using the word “science” as a bludgeon, is hubris. To “inoculate” 700 million people – as guinea pigs in history’s largest medical experiment – is Nemesis.
The Fauci Syndrome
“Scientific totalitarianism is the background music of Anthony Fauci’s brilliant and long-lasting Ponzi scheme,” wrote Charles Ortleb. “A so-called liberal democracy like America demands a covert form of scientific totalitarianism that does not scare the horses of oversight and public opinion.” Fauci is, after all, the man who personifies bureaucratized science. After reading Ortleb’s writings on the AIDS crisis, it appears he described Tony Fauci’s bureaucracy better than anyone. Tony Fauci’s role in the HIV/AIDS fiasco is a case study in scientific falsification for the sake of bureaucratic convenience and profit. “For a scientific Ponzi scheme to prevail in America and Europe,” noted Ortleb, “nobody must recognize that they have acquiesced to a major medical and scientific fraud.” Ortleb further explained:
Nobody must see the telltale signs of fraud, deceit, and censorship. Fauci knew the tricks required to turn ivy-league-educated elite journalists into servile puppets and perky stenographers. I coined the term ‘Bob Club’ to describe the sycophantic journalists who enabled the massive scientific fraud of disgraced National Cancer Institute researcher Robert Gallo. The ‘Tony Club’ is even worse and consequential in ways that will take medical historians generations to fully illuminate. 
Ortleb has described a corrupt bureaucracy, armed with totalitarian prerogatives, led by dishonest and self-serving individuals, tasked with managing the country’s defense in the event of a pandemic or a biological attack. Such a bureaucracy would naturally have been targeted by Russia and/or China for penetration and compromise long ago. The fact that Fauci has partnered with communist China in various enterprises, has probably been misunderstood. If Fauci went to Chinese officials to do gain-of-function research, they would have found his proposals strategically profitable (as opposed to financially profitable). Surely, they have always been ready to accommodate him with glee. “Let him make money,” the Chinese communists might say to themselves. “We will get something better in return.” And why not? Fauci’s Ponzi schemes probably fit in nicely with communist China’s biological war strategy. Why else would Communist Party officials engage with an empty suit like Tony Fauci?
“In one of [Fauci’s] many extraordinary feats of uncanny foresight,” noted Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “beginning in 2017, Dr. Fauci paid $6 million to his gain-of-function guru, Ralph Baric … to accelerate remdesivir as a coronavirus remedy at China’s biosecurity laboratory in Wuhan.” Kennedy then explained, “Baric used coronavirus cultures obtained from bat caves by Chinese virologists working with Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, another recipient of Dr. Fauci’s funding.” Here we see Fauci blindly putting himself in China’s hands, paying American scientists to work in China toward an unsafe anti-viral treatment for coronavirus that, in the end, displaced effective anti-viral medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Why did Fauci oppose safe medications while advancing the use of an unsafe one? Why did Fauci blast the theory that COVID-19 was a Chinese bioweapon? Why did he deny that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese lab? At every turn Fauci was covering for the Chinese. At every turn, the Chinese were also covering for Fauci.
On 22 April 2020 it was reported from China that remdesivir had “flopped in its first randomized clinical trial, disappointing scientists and investors who had high hopes….” Yet, on 29 April 2020 Fauci ordered this dangerous and failed drug to be used in American hospitals. “This will be the standard of care,” said Fauci. “We think it’s opening the door to the fact that we now have the capability of treating COVID-19.” According to Kennedy, Fauci made this statement with full knowledge of the “placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed remdesivir utterly ineffective …. Worst of all, the Chinese study confirmed remdesivir’s deadly toxicity.”
Of course, there was money to be made with Gilead Sciences’ new medicine (remdesivir). Yet, Fauci did not fear getting caught or exposed. One might ask what kind of cartel – what kind of clique – can protect a man of his type? Certainly, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has played its part. They discovered that remdesivir was toxic and dangerous, but they did not send urgent warning messages to the American people that Fauci was poisoning them. While leveling charges against “capitalism” and “imperialism” is integral to communist propaganda, silence was the rule in this instance. The Chinese placebo-controlled study stayed under the radar. That China was a friend of Fauci is now clear. That they would avoid using his poisons on their own population is also clear. (Of course, the Chinese are perfectly happy using toxic treatments on “undesirable” categories of persons). If Fauci was okay with killing COVID patients in American hospitals that was his business. At any rate, this could be used to build an alibi for China later. If Fauci’s crew wants to make money with Gilead, then let them make money.
According to Ortleb, Fauci was unscrupulous. If that is so, it is what made him an ideal yet unwitting partner in China’s biological war strategy. Anyone willing to do a little homework can see that Fauci had been involved in obfuscating certain scientific questions during the AIDS outbreak of the 1980s. In dealing with this “crisis,” Fauci spread confusion by muddying the science. He advanced toxic treatments involving drugs like AZT (azidothymidine), based on the theory that HIV was the cause of AIDS. It was Charles Ortleb, among others, who suggested HIV could not have been the cause of AIDS. It should come as no surprise that it was Fauci who suppressed scientific debate on this question. He ably intimidated the media. He strong-armed writers and threatened the careers of scientists. Fauci had a totalitarian aversion to free inquiry. In fact, I know a scientist who had to leave the United States nearly three decades ago because of Fauci’s bureaucratic bullying.
Since biological war directly impacts strategic planning, the Russian and Chinese special services have long been tasked with infiltrating and compromising those agencies charged with defending America from biological attack. There is no escaping this fact. Corruption in Fauci’s NIAID, or in the NIH and CDC, must never be regarded as a simple case. Corruption in these institutions threatens our national survival. The danger is especially great when an enemy is politically and economically positioned to exploit existing corruption. Any hint of impropriety or conflict of interest within the NIAID, NIH, or CDC should not be viewed with mere indignation or outrage. It cannot be indulged and tolerated as most corruption is. It should be viewed as an immediate threat to the nation’s existence – as a matter of life and death touching every American, every family, and all allied countries. The usual offhand cynicism about our institutions should not be allowed to demoralize us, neither should this matter devolve into the usual run of conspiracy narratives which invariably talk of “an inside job.” No. An inside job would not threaten the existence of the country. We are talking about an outside job; that is, subversion by a foreign enemy; attack by a foreign enemy; extermination at the hands of a foreign enemy. Therefore, to speak of corruption at the NIAID, NIH, and CDC without speaking of China and Russia in the same breath, is to feed the enemy’s diversionary narratives.
The first thing in politics is to identify enemies and friends. The second thing is to identify traitors; for wherever you have enemies, you have traitors. Anthony Fauci presided over our biological defenses for many decades. He is retired, now, but during his long tenure the Russians and Chinese must have noticed his unique deficits. During the AIDS crisis Fauci spread confusion on every side, stifling debate. Some scientists, even now, privately believe HIV is not the cause of AIDS. About this, Charles Ortleb wrote of an alternate theory, smashed by Fauci and his bureaucratic mafia at a 1990 conference in Amsterdam:
Tragically, the HIV-negative AIDS cases were not a wakeup call for the scientists that ‘something had gone wrong’ and hence the anomalous cases were not ‘a prelude to discovery.’ Even though HIV-negative cases ‘violated deeply entrenched expectations,’ they were not allowed to change anything about the AIDS paradigm. In Kuhn’s world of normal science, ‘the traditional pursuit prepares the way for its own change.’ [The] Amsterdam [conference] showed that AIDS research was being conducted in normal science’s cockamamie opposite world, one that should be called ‘abnormal, and totalitarian, and sociopathic science.’ Even if the HIV-negative AIDS cases could have ultimately led to a new paradigm that was ‘able to account for wider range of natural phenomena,’ they were dead on arrival. 
Ortleb was not alone in denouncing Fauci’s totalitarian methods. Nearly thirty years ago, two scientists wrote, “Based on internal documents released to us by an anonymous source, we know that … key offices of the U.S. government specifically engineered a strategy for suppressing the HIV debate.” In terms of research grants and medical patents, how much did Fauci’s Ponzi scheme harvest? Could foreign intelligence agents have missed this episode?
Imagine the potential harm wrought by a vain and unprincipled bureaucrat. Imagine how such a person could enable a scenario for a Chinese biological attack without fully knowing what he was enabling. It is only logical that the Russian and Chinese intelligence services would have thick files on Fauci and his colleagues – tasked as they were with defending the U.S. against communist bloc bioweapons. A gifted analyst, somewhere in the labyrinths of Moscow or Beijing, might have discovered that Fauci was, as Ortleb claimed, “The Bernie Madoff of science” who ran an HIV Ponzi scheme that concealed the truth about a disease that has long since lost the limelight. What damage might someone of that kind do during the outbreak of a novel coronavirus? Might he be encouraged, through corrupt practice, to falsely guarantee the safety of an mRNA injection for 700 million persons in West? What Chinese general would not piggyback on the malfeasance, stupidity and greed of such a bureaucrat?
More than twenty years ago, Chinese Defense Minister Chi Haotian reminded an elite audience of Communist Party officials that, “Our Party’s historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out.” General Chi said that once China opened its doors to “the profit-seeking western capitalists,” it was inevitable they would “invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in the world.” In this way the West would awaken what General Chi called “the sleeping lion that is China.” Chi said that China would then “become unstoppable!” China needs living space, said Chi, “Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all our issues. First, this makes it possible for us to migrate there [i.e., America] and even establish another China under the leadership of the CCP.”
How could China, with all its backwardness, solve the American problem? Chi told his party colleagues, “Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not.” Chi was talking about a lethal biological attack on the United States:
Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. 
The beauty of a biological attack is in the potential anonymity of the attacker. The way the world now works, with countries sharing microorganisms and biological technologies, an attacker could easily acquire specimens from a target country. An attacker could even involve the target country’s leading health officials in gain of function research – using American arrogance and greed against itself. How difficult could it be for the KGB or Chinese State Security to recruit corrupt American officials? Look at who is President of the United States!
In December 2020, Chinese sociologist, Dr. Li Yi, excitedly described the strategic situation of the COVID-19 pandemic: “It turns out that China is going to overtake the United States in 2027. It was said that this might be delayed for a year or two, but this year, God has pulled off a little trick” spreading the COVID-19 infection “to every country in the world.” Dr. Li further explained, “The COVID-19 pandemic is like a test for all the countries of the world. This test is biased though. COVID-19 is bad for Europe and America.”
Let the record show that the CCP allowed the COVID-19 virus to leave Wuhan in the wake of the Chinese New Year celebration in January 2020. The greatest movement of people, in and out of China, takes place before and after the New Year’s celebration. The CCP knew there was a viral outbreak. But they did not lock down the city. They did nothing to protect their foreign “partners.” Instead, they incubated the virus in Wuhan. Then they let travelers carry the virus to North America, Europe, Australia by air. Dr. Li explained that this was to the advantage of China and North Korea. He hinted that the capitalist system cannot cope with pandemics or other emergencies. The Chinese system can cope. The Chinese system, he said, has shown its superiority. Therefore, Dr. Li concluded, “We are ahead of schedule in terms of overtaking the United States. There will be no problem reaching this goal in 2027. The U.S. will not survive … and we are expanding our military at a rate unprecedented in human history.”
Dr. Li’s speech echoes the secret speech of Defense Minister Chi Haotian when he says, “As long as 1.4 billion Chinese people eat, sleep, defecate, and urinate every day; as long as we go to work every day, we will drive the U.S. to its death.” But Dr. Li is not the only Chinese communist to hint at a Chinese biological attack. Consider the comments of another Chinese professor, Chen Ping, a senior Researcher at the China Institute of Fudan University (a CCP think tank). In a video presentation, Professor Chen said, “In 2020, China won the trade war, science and technology war, and especially the biological war. The achievement is unprecedented.”And so it is.
Biological Warfare and the Blame Game
Why would Chinese academics or Communist Party members like Professor Chen say that China has “won” a biological war against America? How does this statement fit with General Chi Haotian’s secret speech about eliminating 100 to 200 million Americans? How does it relate to Dr. Li’s statement that “we will drive the U.S. to its death”? General Chi said that China plans to attack America with biological weapons. Dr. Li says that America will die. In relation to these statements, Professor Chen is implying that the COVID-19 pandemic is part of this strategic offensive – with China gaining mastery over trade, technology, and the politics of viral pandemics. Of course, only a small percentage of Americans have died from COVID; and only a small percentage have died from the vaccines (so far). What are we to make of this?
Perhaps Professor Chen’s remark about China’s victory in this so-called “biological war” is a function of the West’s willingness to be duped by Chinese lies. To safely prosecute a biological war, China must successfully depict each successive pandemic as naturally occurring or accidental. China must impose this interpretation on the rest of the world, at all costs. In fact, China has successfully imposed this interpretation on the mainstream media and the U.S. Government.
When the time comes to place blame on someone for the pandemic and the mRNA vaccines, you can rest assured that the Americans will be the scapegoat. And you can be sure that China and Russia will broadcast America’s guilt to the entire world. Ready at hand, are American environmentalists who have proposed a global population limit of 500 million people. The Internet is full of allegations that the American elite has initiated a “global genocide.” This narrative has already been advanced through pro-Russian and Chinese disinformation channels. And the narrative is gaining traction. In addition, Russian and Chinese sources allege U.S. “biological military activities” in Ukraine.
Assuming General Chi’s plan is still on the table, China must justify its genocidal moves by propagating narratives accusing the United States of genocidal moves. The best justification for exterminating the American people is to implicate America in a heinous plot against mankind. A genocidal campaign against America must be portrayed, politically, as an act of self-defense on the part of America’s enemies. Arguments are already being deployed, in Russia and China, to justify an extermination policy against the United States. Moscow and Beijing would not have designed these narratives unless they were intending to carry out genocidal attacks of their own. Long ago Stalin told a room of young law students in Leningrad: “If anyone accuses us of crimes, we accuse them.”
Of course, before China can successfully blame its intended victim, the CCP must hide its role in spreading the novel coronavirus. China must also hide its role in the development of the mRNA vaccines, which are inherently suspicious insofar as the left-dominated bureaucracies of the West – against all common sense – have pushed these vaccines on children and pregnant woman. It is the Marxists, the communists, the fellow-travelers and useful idiots who have been at the forefront of pushing the vaccine mandates.
While America is being set up for blame, China’s guilty actions remain hidden behind a wall of silence. In December 2021 President Joseph Biden smirked and walked away when The New York Post asked why he hadn’t “done more to push China to be transparent on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.” When former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison – a conservative – called for an investigation into the coronavirus’s origins, China warned Australia that Sino-Australian relations could be damaged “beyond repair.” In the Chinese press, Australia was characterized as “chewing gun stuck on the sole our shoes.” The Australian prime minister did not persist in his position, finding little support from America on this issue. Later, Morrison’s government was replaced by a more China-friendly government, as in America and Brazil.
The fact that an investigation into the origins of the pandemic is opposed by Beijing, that Western leaders are threatened when calling for an investigation, is suggestive of Chinese guilt. If China were innocent, China would welcome an investigation. From the moment China resisted an international inquiry into the pandemic’s origins, the West should have turned its back on China. Trade with China should have been curtailed. But this did not happen.
A Global Vaccine Mandate
The World Health Organization, for many years, has issued a medical passport called a “yellow card.” It certifies that a person traveling between certain countries has been vaccinated against diseases like yellow fever, cholera, and rubella. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic the United Nations and the World Health Organization have proposed to build an official registry of persons vaccinated for COVID-19. What this list might become, and how it could be used to control people, and force injections into people, is worth considering.
The World Health Organization (WHO), which has been referred to as “China’s puppet,” is presently setting up a global health dictatorship. It is working towards a global vaccine mandate. If the science bureaucrats of the United States link arms with the science bureaucrats of China, using the World Health Organization as a cudgel, we may be looking at the forcible vaccination of every American. As transparency has been wanting with respect to the mRNA vaccines, we will see an even greater lack of transparency attending a global vaccine mandate. With its central role in making medicines and vaccine precursors, China will be a principal player in forcing select vaccines on America and the West. As we saw with the mRNA vaccination process, a future global vaccine mandate will involve intrigue, secrecy, bullying, and lies. In other words, a global vaccine mandate will follow communist practice. 
How dangerous are vaccines of the new type, deployed without transparency by unaccountable bureaucrats?
According to Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd, the mRNA vaccines are killing people in the United States. According to Dowd’s analysis, “From February 2021 to March 2022, millennials experienced the equivalent of a Vietnam war with more than 60,000 excess deaths. The Vietnam war took 12 years to kill the same number of healthy young people we’ve just seen die in 12 months.” Last year Dowd “convened a group of insurance industry executives to explore” this data further. Expert analysts were recruited from around the world. They discovered that COVID-19 vaccines have been injuring and killing people since their deployment. Worse yet, America’s media is sticking to the narrative of our science bureaucrats that vaccines are safe, that the risks are negligible.
At this juncture it is worth citing two vaccine deaths documented in Dowd’s book. The first involves Australian cricket legend Shane Warne, vaccinated in March 2021. Warne said, “Get your double vax and get on with it and learn to live with it.” Shortly thereafter he died of a suspected heart attack, age 52. Another case was that of Jake R. Kazmarek, 28-years-old, who decided to be vaccinated after initially hesitating. He said, “You can hold out as long as you want but you won’t have much freedom. I’m over it, I did it. Does it make me a sheep? No.” He died four days after being administered the second shot.
In Steve Kirsch’s newsletter we read of a man who owns funeral homes across America, handling over 3,000 deaths a year. On condition of anonymity, this man said his business went up by 50 percent after the vaccines came out. Sadly, he acknowledged, a disproportionate number of the deaths are young people. Kirsch interjected that there has been a twelve-fold increase in still births – deaths that often do not go through funeral homes. The owner of the funeral homes said his company had never buried a teenager who died of a heart attack in 78 years of operating. In December 2022 they buried one teenager a week for three straight weeks – all dead from heart attacks. Nurses who never saw a teenage heart attack are seeing them regularly. Kirsch’s sources also told him of “strange rubbery clots” funeral directors are finding in corpses. One funeral home even called in a medical examiner who confirmed the that the clots were real. The medical examiner would say nothing publicly because he was afraid of losing his job.
The vaccines are not only killing people, however. They are injuring people. Dowd shows that America now has its highest-ever disability rates. Prior to the vaccine mandates 29-30 million Americans of working age were disabled. After mass vaccination the number jumped to almost 33 million. “For math geeks,” noted Dowd, “that’s a stunning 3 standard deviation event.” In other words, this increase in disabilities is probably not due to chance. And how bad are these disabilities? Dr. Jessica Rose, who has studied U.S. Government VAERS data, says, “Although death is the most extreme adverse event, there are some things that might actually be worse than death.”
Our science bureaucrats, of course, are not going to admit to a grisly blunder. According to the CDC director, vaccinating a million children will cause only 30 or 40 cases of myocarditis. As Dowd’s book shows, this is a boldfaced lie. According to Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University, “We’re now learning that there’s significant heart damage [from the shots], 31% of people having physical activity restrictions. 63% of children after myocarditis had evidence of heart swelling months down the road on MRI. So we are playing with fire.”
In his book, Edward Dowd shows that the vaccines are striking down healthy people. As we know, the coronavirus principally threatened the infirm and the elderly. Simply put, the vaccines pose a greater threat to society than the pandemic. Then there is the damage vaccines are doing to reproductive organs in men and women. Toward the end of his book, Dowd writes:
Public health officials and vaccine makers are aware of everything that you now know from this book – at a minimum. At this point, they have moved beyond something we could write off as incompetence, in that they are allowing (and even forcing) mass use of products they know are harmful. At this point, powerful people in public health and Pharma are in full cover-up mode. They almost have to be, because it’s hard to imagine how they could pivot from what they’ve done to what they ought to do.”
The negligence and malfeasance of American officials has been criminal. And these officials must be held to account, with no leniency or exceptions. What is even more important in this situation, however, is China’s role in the background. We cannot be putting things into our bodies that are made in China, or pushed by people who are beholden to China (at the CDC or the WHO). And we must not be forced to take such products intravenously. Anyone who tries to forcibly vaccinate Americans with a vaccine made in China, or using Chinese vaccine precursors, should be considered a public enemy and placed under arrest. In this context, it is one thing to have criminally negligent health officials, it is another thing to have criminally negligent health officials collaborating with the communist Chinese – in such things as “vaccine passports” and future vaccine mandates. (Also see, China’s dominance of the World Health Organization).
When the Most Dangerous Disease is Diagnosis
Coming to the wrong conclusions from the right facts is a disease. Take, for example, Sasha Latypova’s Substack – titled “Due Diligence and Art.” She says that DARPA and the Pentagon intend to genocide the American people. She has written an article titled, “The role of the U.S. DoD (and their co-investors) in ‘covid countermeasures’ enterprise.” There are fascinating tidbits in what she writes. But there are serious problems with her analysis. Pursuing her investigation, Sasha asked the AI Chat Bot what the role of the DoD has been in covid-countermeasures. The Chat Bot linked her to a thread from DARPA’s website on the organization’s role in combating pandemics.
DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. On the DARPA website, under the heading of Treat & Prevent, we read that “DARPA technology contributes to preventing future COVID-19 infections through novel vaccine technology and more pervasive environmental aerosol monitoring … and domestic active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacture.”
Is this a smoking gun? No. Does this prove that DARPA and the DoD are engaged in a genocidal campaign against America? No. If DARPA was not researching solutions, working on vaccine technologies, what else would they be doing? Seriously. Research is what government scientists, in their laboratories, are hired to do. In fact, such people are specialists. Nietzsche called them “microscopists” – people who know more and more about less and less. As such, they are not counterintelligence experts, qualified to know when their research is being hijacked by agents of a foreign power. In such matters a science bureaucracy is more like a litter of blind kittens. But there is more to it than this. A significant percentage of U.S. government scientists happen to be Chinese nationals, some of whom are probably Chinese agents. According to the Center for Security Policy’s Team B Report on the pandemic, a major “threat vector for bio sabotage is the presence of Chinese nationals – including People’s Liberation Army personnel – in America’s university and national laboratories, research centers, National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), etc.”
If DARPA and the Pentagon are master conspirators, working toward the demise of mankind, there remains a burning question: What self-respecting master-conspirator would casually allow the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to infiltrate his agency?
A blind kitten bureaucracy could hardly be expected to know there is anything wrong with mRNA vaccines. Each microscopist trusts his manager, who trusts the manager above him, and so on. As Jonathan Swift famously wrote:
So, naturalists observe, a flea Has smaller fleas that on him prey; And these have smaller still to bite ‘em And so proceed ad infinitum.
Each “flea,” as it were, is focused on his specialization. Is this nefarious? No. It is bureaucratic “science.” But Sasha says DARPA and the DoD are plotting to kill us. One might ask, are all the junior professors teaching political correctness on college campuses preparing to overthrow the government? No. It doesn’t work like that. Each bureaucratic flea does what he is trained to do for the Great Circus of Fleas, not knowing the real significance of his contribution. Usually, the person at the top is just an empty suit – a fraud, like “the man behind the curtain” in the Wizard of Oz. If he is corrupt, he thinks it’s about money. Even here he is too limited to grasp the strategic significance of his actions. If any of these people have guilt, it is the guilt of not knowing; that is, of the intellectual laziness that attends smallness.
Sasha, of course, paints a very different picture of our Great Circus of Fleas. She writes, “the U.S. Government and DOD specifically ordered a fake theatrical performance from the pharmaceutical manufacturers. Just to make extra certain that the pharmas [sic] are free to conduct the fakery, the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.”
She makes the DoD into a puppet-master and the pharmaceutical companies into puppets. She misunderstands the fundamentals. Long ago it was understood: vaccines do save people, but they also kill people. Therefore, under President Reagan, the vaccine companies threatened to stop making vaccines if they were not legislatively secured against legal liability. Therefore, Congress passed the legislation and President Reagan signed it. Was Reagan involved in a nefarious conspiracy? No. It was a cost-benefit calculation by people who believe vaccines save more lives than are killed by the side-effects. To omit this fact is to forget that political leaders are faced with difficult choices all the time. And these leaders are only human.
Belief in the safety and utility of vaccines is longstanding. Opposition to all vaccines in principle is a minority position. If you are bitten by a rabid dog, what do you do? You had better get a rabies shot. If you don’t want to get tetanus, you get a tetanus shot. Nearly everyone in America has been vaccinated for something. Of course, a small percentage of people die from vaccines. Yet most scientists believe vaccines save more people than they harm. In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, most bureaucrats believed that more people would be saved by the mRNA vaccines than harmed. We should remember that most Americans naively believe in the “scientific” explanations of “scientists.” One might add that our blind kitten science bureaucracy is also naïve, believing uncritically in itself. Many who pushed the vaccines in and out of government are not conspirators. In all countries and ages people have believed in things that are untrue. This does not make them evil. This makes them human. The real guilt comes when Big Pharma and the science bureaucracy, having committed a grisly series of blunders, lie to cover up their mistakes. This, again, is a very human thing to do. Who, indeed, readily admits to homicidal negligence? It is damnably wrong, of course; but it is not a conspiracy to exterminate America.
In respect of this, Item 1.1.1 in Sasha’s document trove is one of those blacked-out papers where 99 percent of the content has been redacted. It starts out, “Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development and distribution (excluding China) of a potential mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine aimed at preventing COVID-19 infection….” Sasha says, “I know what is in the redacted part of the above paragraph and it was not hard to figure out.” She does not tell us how she knows, however, that the redacted paragraph refers to “Fosun Pharmaceuticals” – a Chinese pharmaceutical company that joined up with Pfizer and BioNTech in the early days of the pandemic. Sasha gives kudos to Naomi Wolf as the “only journalist” who has mentioned Fosun International Ltd as a mRNA vaccine manufacturer. Given the suspicious nature of pandemic, coming out of China as it did, we should all be interested in Fosun’s involvement with vaccine production. Fosun International Ltd is a conglomerate run by a Chinese Communist Party official named Guo Guangchang. In March of 2020, as the pandemic was going worldwide, Fosun Pharma invested $55 million in BioNTech, becoming an important shareholder. Around that time Pfizer also increased its ownership of BioNTech. And why not? Vaccines were being discussed as a possible solution to the pandemic, and there was a lot of money to be made.
So far, all we have in Sasha’s presentation is a bunch of documents about contracts and investments. If there is a malady in this paperwork, what is Sasha’s diagnosis? She writes, “many people ask me ‘what about China and Russia?’ when I talk about our own government and DoD engaged in mass genocide of Americans. I answered about China – they are allied with the US DoD on this.”
But nearly two million people work for the federal government. Are they all involved? Sasha does not say. And why would our government leaders and Pentagon generals connive at the extermination of their own country – the killing of their colleagues, friends, and relatives? What is their motive for mass murder? What benefits do they hope to gain? Sasha does not say.
Genocide is defined as “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” Of course, Sasha does not present evidence that the U.S. Government, let alone the Pentagon, wants to exterminate the American people. She presents evidence that the government has been working on vaccines, that Pfizer made deals with Fosun International Ltd. Without considering the history of American naivete regarding China and Russia, sasha jumps to a conclusion she has no real evidence for.
We have to ask ourselves how likely is it that (a) the U.S. Government intentionally made the vaccines to kill off the America people? And (b) how likely is it that the U.S. Government is peopled by suicidal maniacs who want to put an end to their own lucrative retirements? In fact, this is what Sasha is alleging. On its face, how probable does any of it sound? Sasha does not produce a “Secret Speech” by General Milley, along the lines of General Chi Haotian’s secret speech. So why does she emphasize the guilt of American officials above that of Chinese officials?
In fact, Sasha’s ideas about the role of Russia and China give the whole game away. Quite explicitly, Sasha says that China is “allied with the U.S. DoD engaged in mass genocide….” She adds, however, that China is only participating for profit, for the money, for what she calls “the financial windfall of the U.S. government printing dollars and throwing them in the mRNA furnaces where they are driving masses of the brainwashed citizens to suicide themselves.” That is to say, the master conspirators are in the U.S. Government, not in the Chinese government. The Chinese have simply been bribed and are performing the role of “accessories” to mass murder. The primary murderers are Americans.
Sasha then moves quickly to exonerate Russia: “I have not seen evidence of any similar alliance with Russia. This makes sense, because ultimately this boils down to the war of the U.S. vs. Russia using proxies and alliances (as it always does). This does not mean that Russia are ‘the good guys.’” Then Sasha suggests that the “owners” of Russia are “not necessarily based in Russia.”
The owners of Russia are not based in Russia?
This whole formulation reeks of conspiracy theory. Nobody who has studied Russia seriously, or studies history, is going to make a statement like this. One may search all the history books, all the encyclopedias, and all the newspapers without finding a shred of evidence that Russia is owned by someone “not based in Russia.” This preposterous idea smacks of Lenin’s theory of imperialism; though Lenin was never so crude as to say, “the owners of Russia are not based in Russia.” Furthermore, Lenin would not say such a thing about today’s Russia, which supports every communist regime on the planet (including North Korea and Cuba).
One might sarcastically respond to Sasha’s analysis by asking whether the foreign owners of Russia, like the family car, have a pink slip? Do the “owners” of Russia pay annual registration fees to the UN’s National Ownership of Countries Department? If Sasha is not wearing a tinfoil hat, then what kind of hat is she wearing?
But then Sasha’s analysis gets ever weirder, where she writes, “Russia is running the same ‘covid scripts,’ using knock off RNA/DNA injections, probably buying materials from the same suppliers, and also using [the] war to kill off their own younger population. It’s just that they are doing it for THEIR OWN interests, not that of the U.S. and their allies.”
But I thought she said Russia was owned by people “outside of Russia.” Now she says Russia is following its own interest by killing its own people. She ought to explain how it is in the interest of a government to kill off its people. For if all the people are killed off, who is left to govern? If you are going to write serious political analysis, you must be consistent in your premises. You cannot play bait and switch, trundling back and forth between incompatible notions. Specifically, what interest does Russia have in killing off its own younger population if they are already doing it with the same “covid scripts” as the Americans? COVID vaccines are a much easier kill mechanism, and less destructive of property, than a war. Sasha’s analysis makes no sense.
And here is where Sasha really loses me. If the Kremlin wants to kill off the Russian people, even as the U.S. government wants to kill off the American people, why say the Kremlin is doing it for Russian interests as opposed to U.S. interests? She never tells us what the U.S. Government interest is in killing off the American people? I mean, the idea is absurd on its face. There can be no government interest in killing off the people it is tasked with protecting. Are they doing it because these politicians and bureaucrats don’t want their retirement pensions? Of course, she does not explain.
One non sequitur follows another. Sasha says that the “Covid-19 vaccines are biowarfare agents, legally not medicines….” Where, may I ask, are the documents expressly demonstrating this? Here we find words of blame inserted, willy-nilly, throughout Sasha’s text. She writes as if the documents she cites can speak for themselves, saying in effect: “Hey, I’m a Pfizer contract and I’m proof that the U.S. Government wants to exterminate the American people.” And we, the audience, are supposed to look on, horrified and say, “Oh no. It is a smoking gun!”
But we see neither a gun nor smoke. In reality we see a mix of blind kittens, penetration agents, and greedy opportunists. Such people might enable a genocidal attack, unwittingly. But clearly, an attack of this kind can only originate from outside the country; for the motive of such an attack can only be found in the Chinese Communist Party, and in the secret speech of Chi Haotian which refers to “cleaning up America” so that a second China can be built in the lower 48 states.
Sasha presents her conspiracy theory, when all is said and done, in the following way: “The current war is the war of the global governments (plural), that only pretend to be at odds with each other, marketing themselves as ‘left,’ ‘right,’ … etc. in a never ending clown show of the political theater. Behind the scenes, the ‘official enemies’ are partners and co-investors into ‘joint ventures’ against us, [the] people of the world.”
Political Science 101, according to James Burnham, holds that, “Politics is about three things. It is about power, power, and power.” How does a government increase its power by exterminating its own people? Economics 101 teaches us that business is about profit. How do corporate executives maintain profits when they have killed off all their customers? Sasha’s analysis violates the fundamental axioms of politics and business. Such brilliant conspirators they all are! – drooling morons who want to kill and impoverish themselves!
Sasha may mean well, but she has no analytical ability, no historical understanding, no strategic insight. I cannot understand why people forwarded her commentary to me, as if I was missing something. Her commentary is, in its own right, a false narrative – inverting blame for the pandemic and the vaccines (insofar as these represent a biological attack). Hers is a screed that disconnects motive from action, cause from effect, and real fact from childish imaginings.
Links and Notes
 Edward Dowd, Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of sudden Deaths (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2022), p. 80.
 J.H. Rothschild, Tomorrow’s Weapons: Chemical and Biological (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964), p. 133.
 Dowd, P. 33: “Ignoring these deaths is the greatest disrespect we could ever show. These young people and their families and communities deserve to have someone care about why they died – “
 Reiss and Bhakdi, Corona, False Alarm? (Kindle Edition), p. 109.
 Prior to 2020 articles can be found which describe mRNA-therapy as “Gene Therapy.” (See, for example, “Therapeutic Prospects of mRNA-Based Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma” from Frontiers in Oncology, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01208/full. After the advent of the mRNA vaccines, this characterization (as “gene therapy”) is vigorously denied by the mainstream press, which ran articles denying that mRNA was gene therapy in any sense. The distinction arises as mRNA only affects protein cell production rather than the genetic makeup of the cell. Allegedly, there is no mutagenesis with mRNA therapies; thus, the gene itself is not altered, only the cell’s protein production. But there remains a curious subtlety: the genetic function of the cell is changed although the mRNA does not penetrate the cell nucleus, being released inside the cytosol of cell.
 From this quote a profound question arises. How could a microbiologist of Bhakdi’s stature, mistakenly characterize the mRNA vaccines as a “gene-based vaccine” when the mainstream press and the vaccine producers all declare mRNA is no such thing?
 While it is certainly true that mRNA technology does not aim at the nucleus of the cell, where most of the DNA resides and the gene sequence may be modified, mRNA technology nonetheless aims at the cytosol, an aqueous component of the cytoplasm of a cell, in which various organelles and particles are suspended, including hundreds to thousands of mitochondria which have their own DNA. To say that an RNA molecule injected into the cell cannot interact with or have an impact on mitochrindrial DNA is to say more than we know.
 Nemesis, signifies divine retribution, implacable justice. As a Greek Goddess, Nemesis is an avenger of crime, from whom there is no escape. Nemesis enacted divine retribution on Narcissus for his vanity, and upon Aura for her prideful virginity.
 Charles Ortleb, Fauci: The Bernie Madoff of Science and the HIV Ponzi Scheme that Concealed the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic (USA: Rubicon Media, 2019), p. 39.
 Martin Delaney, founder and head of the AIDS activist group Project Inform, wrote about AZT as follows: “The multi-career clinical trials of AZT are perhaps the sloppiest and most poorly controlled trials ever to serve as the basis for an FDA drug licensing approval…. Because mortality was not an intended endpoint, causes of death were never verified. Despite this, and a frightening record of toxicity, the FDA approved AZT in record time, granting a treatment IND in less than five days and full pharmaceutical licensing in less than 6 months.” From Lauritsen, Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story (New York: Asklepios, 1990), p. 27.
 Faddis, Freeman, Gaffney, Hatfill, Kennedy, Mills, Nyquist, The CCP is at War With America: A Team B Report on the COVID 19 Biological Warfare Attack (Washington, D.C.: Center for Security Policy, 2022), p. 41.
 Jonathan Swift, Poetry, A Rhapsody. Note 1. “Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite ‘em
“And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum. “And the great fleas themselves, in turn, have greater fleas to go on; “While these again have greater still, and greater still, and so on.” De Morgan: A Budget of Paradoxes, p. 377.
 Anthony Fauci probably falls into this category; for he has not moved to China, or Russia.
There is no community of language with the representatives of the dominant ideologies. Hence, the community of language that he himself wants to use in order to criticize the users of ideological language must first be discovered and, if necessary, established.
On Sunday, February 5, a discussion on the importance of Anatoliy Golitsyn took place between four anti-communist writers. For those who wish to understand the importance of Golitsyn in the context of ongoing events, this discussion may serve as an introduction.
Me and my public understand each other perfectly. It doesn’t hear what I say, and I do not say what it wants to hear.
In 1990 Pfizer’s Groton plant was making enough penicillin to supply one third of American needs. By 2008, Pfizer had shuttered all of its drug manufacturing there. Now, pharmacists fill prescriptions for penicillin with essential ingredients made in China.
During a panel discussion in New York, CDC Chairwoman Dr. Carol Baker has suggested that the problem of vaccine refusers could be solved if we get rid of all the white Americans and replace them with vaccinated aliens. Carol Baker is regarded as a “legend” when it comes to infectious diseases, and her defenders say that her remarks were taken out of context. Here is a video clip of what she said:
Nobody now disputed that what occurred was a monstrous crime, but – committed by whom? Who is guilty? How did it happen that nobody saw this sooner? You will not find the guilty. One lot will insist that they knew nothing; another, that they were afraid; others still, that they believed.
General Laura Richardson, with four stars, runs the U.S. Southern Command. Last week she said that the United States Government had asked several Latin American nations – including Venezuela and Cuba – to donate their Russian-made military equipment to Ukraine. The Pentagon has, according to Richardson, offered to give U.S military equipment in exchange for Russian-made equipment “if those countries want to donate to Ukraine.” The nine countries in Latin America are, “Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, and Venezuela.”
The very possibility that there are timeless truths is a reproach to the life of laxness and indifference that modern egotism encourages.
Richard M. Weaver
The atomized individual, cut off from his ancestors and his posterity, does not really see himself. And since he does not see himself, he cannot know himself. His education encourages him to specialize; that is, to know more and more about less and less. He sees history as a fragmented jumble of personalities and incidents which cannot be understood and probably should be ignored. He lacks the intellectual tools to see the patterns that are unfolding directly in front of him.
It was while I was going over these stories that I realized for the first time just how important a part of the communist movement in America the teachers were. They touched practically every phase of Party work. They were not used only as teachers in Party education, where they gave their services free of charge, but in the summer they traveled and visited Party figures in other countries. Most of them were an idealistic, selfless lot who manned the front committees and were the backbone of the Party’s strength in the labor Party and later in the Progressive Party. Even in the inner Party apparatus they performed invaluable services.
Brazil is falling to the communists. America is only a few steps behind. Here is the process: You capture the public schools. You capture the colleges. You indoctrinate and capture the elite. At the same time, you infiltrate the seminaries and corrupt the churches. You take over the tax-exempt foundations. You enter the intelligence community, the government, and the media. You get control of the money spigot. You make and break careers. You finance false fronts. You shape the larger culture. You conquer society itself. There is one thing you must be careful of, however. When your tyranny becomes effective, and society collapses under your destructive policies, and freedom evaporates, the masses will come after you with their guns (if they have any). Perhaps they will come after you with their bare hands. So, it is advisable that you misdirect the masses. You must get them to blame someone else for your crimes. Even more to the point, if you decide to devastate society with a biological attack, you must convince your victims that someone else was behind it. You must maintain your innocence to the end, even as you are taking over the world in plain view.
Suppose the plan is to process millions of people and at some future date trigger those minds at one time? Would we suddenly have a world of saints or a world of armed maniacs shooting at one another from bell towers?
One can detect signs of a suicidal impulse; one feels at times that the modern world is calling for madder music and for stronger wine, is craving some delirium which will take it completely away from reality. One is made to think of Kierkegaard’s figure of spectators in the theater, who applaud the announcement and repeated announcement that the building is on fire.
It is January 2023. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues, with support flowing in from communist China and North Korea. On the brink of acquiring nuclear weapons, Iran also supports Russia. It is no surprise, therefore, that Cuba and Venezuela are hoping for a Russian victory in Ukraine, along with the old/new President of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who ambiguously supports “peace” in Eastern Europe – if only to mask his commitment to the Russia-China bloc.[iii]
Unless either the philosophers become kings … or those who now are called kings and rulers become philosophers … there will be no rest from evil … nor, I believe, for the human race either. And not until that happens, will this politeia of ours have a measure of growth and see the light of the sun.
Are we ruled by wise men or fools? Which country has a philosopher as head of state? France, perhaps? When French President Emmanuel Macron conducted an eight-hour “Great Debate of Ideas” with dozens of academics, people were left wondering. Should we take him seriously? Or is Emmanuel Macron merely an intellectual posing as a philosopher? Rather than striking a pose, a philosopher is concerned with deeper truths while the politician shaves the truth for the sake of political expediency. As Machiavelli might say, deceit is the politician’s obligation if he hopes to succeed. This is how ambitious politicians become slaves to untruth – like the criminal who cannot stop adding to his crimes because a turn toward honesty would prove fatal. In brief, the politician who serves expediency might imagine himself to be powerful and free. Yet he becomes trapped by his own expedient lies.
JRN: DO YOU THINK THE ELECTION IN BRAZIL WAS STOLEN FROM BOLSONARO?
EC: So the cheating in Brazil was very obvious, poorly done. They do not even pretend to follow the Constitution. The Supreme Court of Brazil is a disgrace. Lula is a criminal. It is hard to count the number of crimes he has committed. Just like the dictators of South America of the 1950s and 60s, we are looking to the military to fix the situation. Probably they will do that. But I do not know when or how. I do not know if they are going to allow Lula to become president.
People get into this condition [i.e., ignorance] through their own fault, by the slackness of their lives; i.e., they make themselves unjust or licentious by behaving dishonestly or spending their time in drinking and other forms of dissipation; for in every sphere of conduct people develop qualities corresponding to the activities they pursue.”
Plato and Aristotle were philosophers of Classical antiquity. Those who can read these ancient philosophers in the original Greek are better able to understand the fundamentals of art and science. To understand Plato and Aristotle is to hold a decisive intellectual advantage in all forms of discourse. The value of the ancients is hard to explain to the desiccated modern mind – which is often unable to place facts in their proper context. Modern life is very busy, very distracted. Modern man is trapped in the news cycle, unable to synthesize or unify his knowledge. The ancient science of seeing, weighing, and ordering has largely been lost to us. A modern thinker with access to the ancients, however, is like a man looking down from the top of a mountain. Those who know nothing of the ancients, having journalistic predilections, are only looking down from the foothills. It never occurs to them that there is a mountain to climb. Unlike his journalistic critics, Brazilian philosopher Olavo de Carvalho is someone who climbed that mountain.
The nominalism of a dogma that has separated from experience … has become the dominant form of the West because it was, beginning with the eighteenth century, adopted as the intellectual form of ideologizing.
The practical result of nominalist philosophy is to banish the reality which is perceived by the intellect and to posit as reality that which is perceived by the senses. With this change in the affirmation of what is real, the whole orientation of culture takes a turn….
Psychopathic individuals generally stay away from social organizations characterized by reason and ethical discipline.”
Andrew M. Lobaczewski
To paraphrase Richard Weaver, this is another essay about the dissolution of the West. It is an account of dissolution not based on analogy but on psychiatry and philosophy. It argues that we have given in to the defective thinking of defective people in an Age of Ideology; that is, an age of political lying. The result is an ochlocracy[iii] cut into two warring halves.[iv]
…the USSR was designed and developed as (1) a resource base for the world revolution and (2) its military mobilization apparatus. And, if we consider its subsequent history on the basis of these goals and objectives, then all the actions of the Soviet authorities in the 1920s-50s, which sometimes seem insane, acquire an exhaustive logical explanation….
Marxism-Leninism in Russia can best be understood as having an exoteric and esoteric side. The exoteric Marxism-Leninism was for export. The esoteric was what the leaders of the regime actually thought and how they operated.  Because the regime did not work so well in economic terms, and they were falling behind in technology, they initiated a New Economic Policy under Gorbachev along the lines set down by Lenin in 1922. They were compelled, for various practical reasons, to give up their exoteric Marxism-Leninism in 1991. Only a stupid minority believed that nonsense anyway, and what good are stupid people? Of course, the soft West was full of people who were willing to believe in that sort of thing. After all, they had never lived under it. And Moscow was sure to take advantage of them as before. By promoting feminism and abortion, to kill population growth, economic arguments could be made for importing Muslims and Africans to Europe. This would disorganize the West and bring ruinous consequences in the long term. Add global warming “science,” and naïve policies regarding China, and the West would be doomed to its own existential crisis. At the same time, the special services’ infiltration of Europe and America would continue at an accelerated pace.
In reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion … only about 15 percent of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is [engaged in] a slow process which we call … ideological subversion or active measures…. What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent, that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves….
…the great majority of Americans could be said to represent a refutation on a large scale of the Cartesian principle, ‘Cogito ergo sum’; they ‘do not think and are.’ Better yet, in many cases they are dangerous individuals and in several instances their primitivism goes way beyond the Slavic primitivism of ‘homo sovieticus.’
Anti-Americanism includes more than hatred of the American elite. It includes hatred of the American people as a whole. The reason for paying attention to enemies – to the superior minds in an enemy camp – is to know ourselves through the eyes of that enemy. Having an enemy, or a friend, is an unappreciated spiritual gift. We always have something to learn about ourselves from friends and enemies; from those who hate us, and those who love us; for hatred will always find our faults, as love will find our virtues. In America’s case there is a particularly dangerous fault crying out for correction. That fault is the superficiality of our intellectual culture, particularly our strategic culture.
Politics is about three things: Power, power, and power.
What follows is my interview with Brazilian journalist Allan dos Santos, a leading anticommunist and supporter of President Jair Bolsonaro. Some years ago I did a regular podcast with Allan called Update Brazil. In our first episode we interviewed Diana West and Olavo de Carvalho (the Brazilian conservative philosopher). Allan is a famous voice for freedom in Brazil, breaking stories about communist and Chinese infiltration of that country.
The assertion that nuclear war will not be a continuation of politics is completely fallacious.
Colonel General Makhmut Gareev
We have several disturbing data points emerging in connection with the Ukraine War.
Point 1: On 23 September Polish teachers in Warsaw were asked to hand out iodine anti-radiation pills to students in case of emergency. In connection with this, the Polish Interior Ministry admitted that potassium iodide pills had been sent to regional fire departments after “media reports of fighting near the Zaprozhye Nuclear Power Plant” in southern Ukraine. Yet, the threat to the power plant has been alleged for months. Why send out these pills now?
It doesn’t surprise me at all that the Russians are concerned about [the] Kerch bridge. It’s incredibly important to them.
General Philip Breedlove
According to former supreme allied commander for Europe, Philip Breedlove, commenting last July, the Russians are “very worried about Ukraine launching an attack on the bridge.” And this morning, 8 October 2022, the day immediately following Vladimir Putin’s birthday, the bridge was attacked (supposedly by a truck bomb).
The general horizon of the era is communist. And this communism will have to be constructed on the basis of society’s self-organizing capacities….
Bruno Bosteels, “The Actuality of Communism”
As far as the communist idea is concerned, anybody who forgets that there are two truths in communism is likely to be deceived. The first ‘esoteric’ truth has a dogmatic and immutable character; it corresponds to the basic tenets of the revolution and is formulated in the writings and in the directives of the early Bolshevik period. The second is a changeable and ‘realistic’ truth, which is forged case by case, often in apparent contrast with the first truth, and characterized by eventual compromises with the ideas of the ‘bourgeois’ world…. The varieties of this second truth are usually set aside as soon as they have achieved their tactical objective; they are mere instruments at the service of the first truth. Therefore, those who would fall into this trap and believe that Bolshevism is a thing of the past, that it has evolved and that it is going to take on normal forms of government and international relations, are indeed extremely naive.
Julius Evola, “Revolt From the Modern World”
My Interview With Jean Robin
This is the first in a series exploring the history of communism in Europe and where things are headed.
The Russian will never be able to dispense with the German.”
Otto von Bismarck
In the Russian-occupied oblasts of Ukraine, the voting is over. According to Russian officials, 95 percent of the voters want to be Russian. It seems that the people of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk and Donetsk loved being invaded by Russia so much, they want to be annexed as well. It hardly matters that most of these people are non-Russian. The benefits of Russian citizenship are so appealing and so chocolate-filled, they could not resist. Everyone in Southwest Ukraine just loved how the Russians flattened the city of Mariupol. They admired so much the Russian artillerymen who attacked hospitals and apartment buildings. And the biggest bonus of all: A real KGB-man is now their president, instead of that Jewish comedian in Kiev.
A further reason for my hatred of National Socialism and other ideologies is quite a primitive one. I have an aversion to killing people for the fun of it. What the fun is, I did not quite understand at the time, but in the intervening years the ample exploration of revolutionary consciousness has cast some light on this matter. The fun consists in gaining a pseudo-identity through asserting one’s power, optimally by killing somebody – a pseudo-identity that serves as a substitute for the human self that has been lost.
The pseudo-identity of a totalitarian dictator relies on pseudo-ideas. And what are pseudo-ideas? They are often ideas about the victim status of some group – based on sex, race, nation, or class. We hear these themes regularly; for example, that women or transgenders are oppressed, that non-whites are oppressed, that the poor are oppressed by the rich. Here is a victimology that promotes mass murder by encouraging despair. It is a despair that justifies “killing people for the fun of it.” The National Socialists said Germany was the victim and blamed the Jews. The neo-Marxists say people of color are victims and blame white racism. The old-line Marxists say the workers are victims and blame the bourgeoisie. The dictator states, who also see themselves as victims, blame America and/or NATO. In its current war against Ukraine, the Kremlin uses a confused mix of all-the-above, citing Ukraine as a U.S./NATO/Nazi conspiracy under Ukraine’s Jewish president, who is backed by Jewish oligarchs. Here we have an “all-the-above” goulash of popular resentments to justify Russia’s war of aggression. This justification differs markedly from the usual totalitarian demagogy. It partakes of an intellectual incoherency and rhetorical carelessness suggestive of mental disintegration. Who would have guessed? Russia’s regime of banal mediocrities cannot be bothered to make their lies credible. They no longer possess the intellectual wherewithal of the early Bolsheviks. The elder Soviet statesman laid out a long-range strategy. But now it seems, the post-Soviet generation cannot think for themselves. When the old strategy began to fail, they improvised. It was then, and only then, that the mediocrity of the nomenklatura showed itself. The Russian and Chinese governments are failing their people. Russian military setbacks in Ukraine and a financial meltdown in China follow.
I would say another ten days it should be completely over.
Col. Douglas Macgregor, on day 9 of the war in Ukraine [i]
The term defeatism is commonly used in politics as a descriptor for an ideological stance that considers co-operation with the opposition party. In the military context, in wartime, and especially at the front, defeatism is synonymous with treason.
When a strategist can manipulate both sides in a conflict, where each side represents one blade of a scissors, he can use the slicing of the blades to cut his way through anything. The conflict then becomes a controlled experiment in which the contenders, as thesis and antithesis, are used to establish a new thing (i.e., synthesis). In the present case, Russia and China (using their Western agent networks and “useful idiots”) are playing out this strategy. They are attempting to destabilize Europe and America to remake the world. An essential ingredient in this strategy is defeatism.
If I were to rend my garments every time Dugin hatches a new blasphemy, I would have to buy myself a whole new set of clothes….
Alexander Dugin wanted to ride with friends after a festival event Saturday night. His 29-year-old daughter, Darya, drove his car while he rode in the car behind. Suddenly, the car Darya was driving exploded into a fireball and Darya was burnt beyond recognition. Russian President Vladimir Putin called the attack “vicious and cruel.” Undoubtedly it was. Who carried out the attack? Was it meant for Dugin? And what effect will it have on the war?
Dugin has enemies because his words have an unmistakable militancy. His rhetoric has been violent, even bloodthirsty. He has pushed the war in Ukraine, and many Russians have died who might, on reflection, blame him. War is attended by blame games. The Russian government, taking advantage of this tragedy as a propaganda bonanza, blames Ukraine. From the standpoint of the Kremlin, of course, Alexander Dugin and his daughter are expendable. Especially as the sight of a grieving father might be used to rally a nation that is having second thoughts about a war that is going badly.
On the occult side of the equation, Dugin has allegedly written about the ritual sacrifice of children (about fathers sacrificing their daughters). This is the creepy sort of writing an old fan of Aleister Crowley might engage in. And that, of course, is who Dugin is. Seeing how unserious Dugin is in his political discourse, the way he plays games with the truth, these creepy ideas were never thought to be serious. But now it seems that someone, or some thing, has take him very seriously. Maybe it was something that goes bump in the night.
Regardless of the darker forces at work, blood will answer blood. The heartbroken father says the Ukrainians must pay. The Kremlin says the same. As if to underscore Ukrainian culpability, the FSB claims to have evidence pointing to a Ukrainian woman who entered the country and successfully escaped across the border. But this does not pass a basic smell test. The FSB typically manufactures evidence in assassination cases, or finds no real evidence at all. Take the case of Russian opposition politician Boris Nemtsov, gunned down on a street near the Kremlin in 2015. In this case the FSB extracted confessions by torture. Suspects were killed before they could give testimony. The security cameras at the scene of the crime had been conveniently “turned off for maintenance” when the shooting occurred. Hours before being gunned down, Nemtsov was organizing a march against the war in east Ukraine that began in 2014. As with so many political assassinations in Russia, the Kremlin had motive and opportunity. And now, in the present case, the FSB has allegedly, somehow, identified Darya’s assassin in a matter of hours. You have to wonder.
Of his daughter, Dugin said, “She died for Russia, for the people.” Or did she die so that Moscow might justify more killing in Ukraine – of Russians and Ukrainians? It is impossible, at this distance, to say who detonated the bomb in Dugin’s car that killed his daughter. If Russia demands retribution, the suspicion is at least aroused that the death of Darya Dugina is being exploited to justify some kind of military escalation.
The accused assassin – a Ukrainian woman with a child – allegedly rented an apartment in the same building as Darya, following Darya as she moved around Moscow, changing her vehicle license-plates numerous times as she went. If this was all known, why wasn’t this woman arrested? A supposedly independent Russian media outlet, Agentstvo, asked why an assassin would bring along a child. Ilya Ponomarev, an exiled former Russian MP, suggested the assassination was organized by a Russian resistance organization known as the National Republican Army. But hardly anyone has heard of this group.
In Kiev Ukrainian officials are worried. Will weapons of mass destruction be used against the Ukrainian people? You have to wonder. This also dovetails with Russian activity around the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Is Russia planning to detonate the plant and blame the Ukrainian “Nazis” in order to justify an escalation to tactical nuclear weapons? This may be Moscow’s only way to avoid eventual defeat.
One thing is certain. The war in Ukraine is the beginning of something larger. When the COVID outbreak began, some of us sensed that life would not be returning to normal. One crisis now piggy-backs upon another. We are facing crises involving food, energy, political stability, etc. There are deeper forces at work here, and deeper reasons. We have to wonder what the Russians and Chinese are planning. Why persist in a seemingly futile attack on Ukraine?
The minute we see that Russia is giving up on the war we will all breathe a sigh of relief. Yet the death of Dugin’s daughter signifies an escalation.
Below is my Sunday night discussion with Nevin Gussack
If I am in it [grace], may God keep me in it, and if I am not, may it be God’s will to put me in it.
Joan of Arc, [at her trial]
Men do not share the same spiritual rank. There are the elect ones … who are granted revelation, and then there is the great mass of mortals who would flounder about in eternal darkness if God did not from time to time set astir the ‘highest virtues’ in some individuals who become capable of steering their fellow men in the right direction.
There have been many pretenders in history, many actors who rule through the mask of personality. These know how to imitate the good, the truthful and the just; yet they are empty shells seeking compensation through a mere increase of political power. They always strive to break down the checks and balances around them. By nature, these pretenders hate those who seek “justice and all things honorable … for their own sake.”
If North Korean volunteers with their artillery systems, wealth of experience with counter battery warfare and large caliber multiple rocket systems, made in North Korea, want to participate in the conflict, well let’s give the green light to their volunteer impulse.
Col. Igor Korotchenko Editor-in-Chief National Defense Journal
Speaking on Rossiya 1 Television, Col. Igor Korotchenko said that North Korea had offered Russia 100,000 “volunteer” troops to fight in Ukraine. “Pyongyang will be able to transfer its tactical units to Donbas,” he added, describing the North Korean troops as “Resilient and undemanding”; but more important, he said they were “motivated.” What was most curious was the communist phraseology used by Korotchenko to describe this offer of troops from North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un: “If North Korea expresses a desire to meet its international duty to fight against Ukrainian fascism, we should let them.”[i]
According to a Soviet textbook, written by Kharis Sabirov in 1987, we are living in the “period of transition from capitalism to socialism” where socialism is “the first phase of the communist formation….”[ii] The text further explained, “Socialism, which is the negation of capitalism, means a revolutionary restructuring of all spheres of bourgeois society on the principles of scientific communism.” This can only be done in the course of a relentless struggle by stamping out the sources of [bourgeois] might….”[iii] The founder of the Soviet state, Vladimir Lenin, said that revolutionary socialism was international in character. After World War II, the followers of Lenin asserted that the communist parties of all countries have an international duty to unite and assist one another. In doing this, they were following Lenin’s lead. According to Sabirov, Lenin “upheld the principle of internationalism….” In this context, communist North Korea does not simply fight for the national interests of North Korea or of Russia. North Korea is duty-bound to the other socialist countries.
Korotchenko’s allusion to North Korea’s “international duty” is therefore a clue from on high. As he is Putin’s toady, he would never say anything to displease his boss. He would never use Leninist terminology unless that terminology was approved at the highest levels. The obliteration of the Ukrainian state, he has affirmed, is “absolutely healthy.” Why is it healthy? Because it signifies the restoration of the Soviet Union. In past appearances on Russian state TV channel Rossiya 1, Korotchenko outlined an optimistic scenario for “capturing the Baltic countries.”[iv] What possible reason could Russia have for invading three independent NATO countries? What possible reason does Russia have for invading and destroying the country of Ukraine?
We belong to the Marxist camp and can never be so thoughtless that we cannot distinguish friends from enemies. Nixon, Ford, Carter, and future American imperialistic leaders all fall into this category [of enemies].
Deng Xiaoping, 20 July 1977
The Chinese are continuing to mobilize against the West as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lands in Taiwan. This California politician has helped China and the Marxist cause throughout her career. Now the Chinese help to recast her by making threats related to her Taiwan trip.
Below is my recent interviews with at Man in America and Nevin Gussack, author of Golitysn Vindicated.
The Soviet Strategic Plan for the establishment of their ‘Socialism’ worldwide does, without doubt, exist and, however flexible and pragmatic Soviet policy appears, it is essentially directed towards the achievements of the Plan’s objectives — objectives which have been, are and will remain utterly inimical to and subversive of the freedoms enjoyed by the states of the Western world.
Jan Sejna, Czech communist defector
Sejna made an astonishing statement about the communist bloc in his 1982 book, We Will Bury You. He wrote, “The erosion of N.A.T.O. begun in Phase Two would be completed by the withdrawal of the United States from its commitment to the defence of Europe, and by European hostility to military expenditure, generated by economic recession and fanned by the efforts of the ‘progressive’ movements. To this end we envisaged that it might be necessary to dissolve the Warsaw Pact, in which event we had already prepared a web of bilateral defence arrangements, to be supervised by secret committees of Comecon.” (P. 108) It did not exactly work as planned; but as usual, it partly worked.
Here is my discussion with Amber and Joe on communist strategy, bungling, and things that partly work.
In his recent video on “Russia vs. Ukraine,” Jordan Peterson said that the West must join with Russia in order to counterbalance China; but, like most influential celebrities, Peterson has yet to realize that China and Russia have been secretly working together for a long time. He has not awakened to the fact that President Richard Nixon’s opening to China was a strategic blunder, and partnering with Russia at the end of the Cold War was also a blunder. Russia is now the world’s leading nuclear power, bar none. China is now the greatest industrial power in the world, bar none. Power of this kind is not attained by accident, but by policy. And the West, led by the United States, facilitated the strengthening of these hostile regimes.
In the fifth century storm upon storm out of the dark North swept away in a great deluge of barbarism all the civilization of the western half of the Roman Empire. From the Atlantic to Constantinople, and from the Rhine to the Danube to the deserts of Africa, all that was learned and cultivated, all that was artistic and beautiful, was overwhelmed in an avalanche of ruin in which not only the triumphs of architecture, literature, and art, produced by many centuries of a high civilization, but also those who could create such things afresh, were involved in one general destruction.
Civilization is fragile. It can swept away in a very short time. In fact, Forces are gathering right now to sweep it away. Those who should have been defending our civilization have tended to join with the destroyers: politicians, professors, artists, writers, even scientists. They don’t seem to know what they are doing.
It is naïve to assume that the lower depths of the Sovietological inferno – that is, of Western ignorance and ineptitude in the study of totalitarianism – are where they have always been politically. The new strategy of totalitarianism has made havoc of the political spectrum in Western democracies, and the Right today is scarcely less inclined to self-deception than the Left.”
Again and again, we repeat the same mistake. We make unwise bargains with murderous dictators. After all, they changed from bad guys into good guys. They have embraced capitalism and democratic reforms. They are no longer bad. Therefore, we engage with them. We trade with them. We invest in them. We become accessories after the fact, strengthening regimes that routinely murder their own citizens. Eventually, these same regimes point nuclear missiles at us and demand that whole countries be turned over to them.
If the Fourth Political Practice is not able to realize the end of times, then it would be invalid. The end of days should come; but it will not come by itself. This is a task, it is not a certainty. It is active metaphysics. It is a practice.”
The “philosopher” who has done the most to justify Russia’s war against the West is Aleksandr Dugin. He was the first to advocate a Russian invasion of Ukraine. He has also advocated what he calls “the last war of the world-island” – a future conflict against the United States and NATO. His arguments are as fascinating as they are troubling. Disillusioned conservatives in the West imagine that Dugin – like Putin – is a conservative and a Christian. This is the impression he gives, though his writings blend themes of the far left and far right. On close examination his ideas are not something Edmund Burke (the father of conservatism) would have approved.
The vulnerable features of the imperialist bloc’s economy include high industrial concentration in small areas, dependence on imports, and the vulnerability of communications. The United States depends upon imports of atomic raw materials and of nonferrous and rare metals….
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe met on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue Security Summit in Singapore on Friday. Beijing’s delegation stated that Taiwan is “part of China.” General Wei’s spokesman explained, “The PLA (People’s Liberation Army) would have no choice but to fight at any cost to crush any attempt of Taiwan to be independent. This safeguards our national sovereignty and territorial integrity.” On his part, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin asked China to “refrain from further destabilizing actions.”
I have interviewed Mr. D. Wang and associates, of Lude Media, whose organization acquired a 56-minute recording of a military-civil meeting in Guangdong province tasked with preparing China for war. According to Mr. Wang, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is financing Russia’s war in Ukraine. However, he says, Russia’s best forces are not being used in Ukraine. They have been deployed in the Far East, prepared for action against America.
What Jeff says – there’s a lot of truth to what he says – but that doesn’t discount the fact that the Chinese Communist Party has invested in a quite large military conventional force…. I think the Chinese Navy as it is comprised today … and this new national mobilization order … all lead me to conclude they are preparing for a conventional strike to take Taiwan.
Capt. James Fanell
Capt. Fanell’s response to my comments on Bannon’s War Room is a good starting-point for discussing more significant questions of military strategy. My argument goes something like this: The CCP’s investment in a large conventional force does not, in itself, rule out the possibility of an all-arms nuclear war. In fact, China and Russia have built their forces to wage such war. Sixty years ago, Soviet military strategists under Marshal V.D. Sokolovskii devised the theory that nuclear missile weapons are the decisive weapons of the next world war. It is my position that this philosophy and its underlying science of war is operative in China and Russia today.
In history, the Western powers used warships and opium to colonize China. Now the opposite has happened. We will use our open policy, seize the economic crisis in the West as a historical moment, and use effective measures to turn them into Socialist China’s economic and cultural colonies…. Our colonization of these countries is the historical process of communism’s triumph over rotten capitalism. We Chinese communists must shoulder the great historical mission, and use socialism to defeat capitalism, eventually liberating the entire humanity with Communism.
…as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.
And now comes a strange report out of China. Someone has leaked 56 minutes from a May 14 Provincial CCP meeting in Guangdong. Senior officials from local military and government structures gathered to discuss the Central Committee’s “normal to war transition instructions.” They say that a decision for war has been made. They are calling it “the final war.”[iii] They even speak of a battle for the Taiwan Straits and for the unification of the “motherland.”
Although the global warming panic of the last twenty years has been a wasteful distraction for humanity, it has, thankfully, served one good purpose…. As a consequence, decades of discovery have been shortened into just a few years. Without the outside interest … humanity would be sleepwalking into the very disruptive cooling that will be caused by Solar Cycles 24 and 25 … to at least 2040.”
Last October, CNN meteorologist Allison Chinchar wrote a piece titled “Antarctica’s last 6 months were the coldest on record.”[iii] Last February, as if to paint an entirely different picture, The Scientific American offered the headline, “Sea Ice Around Antarctic Reaches a Record Low.” [iv] This, they claimed, was due to a combination of factors – the leading one, of course, was anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming. The article misleads the reader by suggesting the Antarctic is warming. Nothing was said about the actual state of affairs. “At the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, located on the highest plateau of Antarctica, average temperatures from April to September, the continent’s winter months, fell all the way down to 78 degrees below zero Fahrenheit….” [v] And now, last month, temperatures have hit all-time record lows. Last April 14 the world’s lowest temperature was recorded at Vostok Station – 106.2 degrees Farhenheit.[vi]
Carl Schmitt once said, “Tell me who your enemy is, and I will tell you who you are.” Writing before Hitler came to power in Germany, Schmitt noted that Central Europe was living under the eye of the Russians. Schmitt explained, “Their prowess in rationalism and its opposite, as well as their potential for good and evil in orthodoxy, is overwhelming.” He added, “They have realized the union of Socialism and Slavism, which already in 1848 Donoso Cortés said would be the decisive event of the next century.”[ii]
[You will be part of a] new clandestine structure where you will work with the best of the best. Your personnel files will be removed from the archives. No one will ever know your past. You will become a clandestine agent; you will begin to work for the Fatherland against those who want to destroy it…. I agreed…. I worked directly on cleaning up the archives of the KGB. Together with my files, hundreds of others were removed, including that of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
The criminal nature of Russia’s ruling structures is well known. The criminal nature of Marxism-Leninism is also known, but often ignored. Today the outward trappings of communism in Russia have been papered over – but not entirely. In Red Square, near the Kremlin, we see communist superstar Vladimir Lenin lying in state, after nearly 100 years, mummified in his mausoleum. The music of the Soviet anthem remains, with different words. Instead of “Leningrad” we have “St. Petersburg.” The tricolor flies over the Kremlin instead of the red banner with its hammer and sickle. The Nomenklatura controls the economy, with dolled-up Jewish oligarchs as front men. The KGB and GRU still function as before. The nuclear arsenal and nuclear defenses are new and improved. The army, however, is still the army of Stalin, the Army of 22 June 1941, the Army that lost a quarter of a million men in Finland during the Winter War, etc. And, for reasons unknown, Moscow has attempted to use this army – this Soviet artifact – to force Ukraine back into Moscow’s fold.
Ukraine is on a razor’s edge. The whole thing hangs in the balance. It could go either way. The Ukrainian elite is rotten. It is psychologically Soviet. Poroschenko is just another apparatchik. He is typical. The problem in Ukraine, like in Russia, is that we don’t have any leaders. It is the same old story, same old biographies. The thinking is not that different from the past.
Please be patient! Ukraine is in the midst of a very real and very significant social revolution. This revolution for many Ukrainians involves a new conceptualization of their values and identities. This is a painful process that needs to occur through collective actions, introspection, and without external intervention.
Bukovsky’s pessimism of 2018 is contradicted by Wynnyckyj’s optimism of 2019. The apparatchiks of Ukraine have been subjected to a genuine revolution, says Wynnyckyj. What was once psychologically Soviet has now become something different, something genuinely Ukrainian. Wynnyckyj argues that the Euromaidan Revolution was a “bourgeois revolution,” profoundly anti-Soviet in character. This revolution, he says, is multi-ethnic rather than chauvinistic. It signifies a renewal of the Ukrainian elite. Because of this renewal, and its implications for Russia, the Kremlin has launched a violent military assault against the Ukrainian people that has lasted nine long weeks.
The Russians have taken the European nineteenth century at its word, understood its core ideas and drawn the ultimate conclusions from its cultural premises. We always live in the eye of the more radical brother, who compels us to draw the practical conclusion and pursue it to the end. Altogether … one thing is certain: that the anti-religion of technicity has been put into practice on Russian soil, that there a state arose which is more intensely statist than any ruled by the absolute princes….
A few years ago, there was a slogan going the rounds in Kiev: “We were searching for Europe and we found Ukraine.” Many Ukrainians were sick of Soviet-style kleptocrats governing them with Moscow’s blessing. Better to go with Europe, whatever its flaws. Life as a Kremlin plaything is no life at all. On his side, Putin denied that Ukraine was even a country. “There is no such country,” he said. They cannot be independent of Moscow. Russian propagandists have said that Ukraine is actually two countries: (1) the Ukrainian-speaking west and (2) the Russian-speaking east. Yaroslav Hrytsak, a Ukrainian historian, has called this a heuristic simplification and gross misinterpretation. According to Mychailo Wynnyckyj, “This dichotomous Ukraine never really existed.”[i]
Herman Kahn was controversial. He said things that made his countrymen feel uncomfortable. Kahn, along with rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, allegedly inspired the character “Dr. Strangelove” in the Stanley Kubrick film of the same name. What progressive opinion disliked the most was that Kahn believed in preparing for nuclear war. He argued that even small-cost preparations would produce life-saving results leading to a more rapid post-war recovery. Those whose doctrine was Mutual Assured Destruction did not like the sound of this.
Here one may wonder why, in a situation of blatant violation of human rights by neo-Nazi military forces and paramilitary apparatuses … against the Russian-speaking population of the independent republics, the international community feels obliged to consider the intervention of the Russian Federation worthy of condemnation, and indeed to blame Putin for the violence.
…the message from Moscow was direct and unequivocal: the Russian Federation would resort to full-scale war if the ‘rights of Russians and Russian-speakers in Ukraine continued to be threatened.’ No evidence of such rights actually being threatened was ever provided….
I fear that Monseigneur Vigano, otherwise insightful, has fallen into error. He repeats Moscow’s lies without blushing, without suspecting that he is advancing the propaganda of Christendom’s most dangerous enemy. In Vigano’s message for the April 2nd Reawaken America Rally at Salem Oregon, written at the behest of General Michael Flynn, Vigano suggests that President Putin did not invade Ukraine “to support his expansionist ambitions”; rather, “the main purpose of Russia’s military operation is to prevent the aggression of the deep state and NATO. Putin is fighting against the same globalist elite that holds us all hostage.”[iii]
The defender waits for the attack in position, having chosen a suitable area and prepared it; which means he has carefully reconnoitered it, erected solid defenses at some of the most important points, established and opened communications, sited his batteries, fortified some villages, selected covered assembly areas, and so forth. The strength of his front … makes it possible for him … to inflict heavy losses on the enemy at low cost to himself….
In war, the moral is to the physical as three is to one.
It is said that victory in war goes to the bigger battalions. But Napoleon, who was a master in the art of war, disagreed. He suggested that moral factors were more important than numbers. And what are moral factors? According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, the moral is “concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character.”
How can principles of right and wrong behavior effect the outcome of a battle? War is an exacting business, full of danger and hardship. Under such conditions, honor and integrity are highly prized. Also, a belief in the rightness of one’s cause strengthens a country’s will to resist. Napoleon pointed out that, “Victory belongs to the most persevering.” He added, “The most important qualification of a soldier is fortitude under fatigue and privation. Courage is only second….”
Consider, now, the possibility of a new kind of warfare in which an enemy, instead of launching a direct attack by armies and navies, attacks a country’s moral foundations — its moral character, its moral discipline, its heroes and its founding philosophy. Imagine an attack that seeks to “demoralize” a country on this basis; that is to say, strip it of all those moralizing factors that are — as Napoleon said — “as three is to one.”
Here is the most effective way to weaken an enemy in advance of open warfare. This is not simply a theory, but an historical reality. Think of all the subtle ways America’s moral strength has been sapped. The communists and their political allies on the “progressive” left have not only attacked traditional morality, but they have offered up a false morality, a morality that celebrates cultural and sexual suicide. They have crippled marriage as an institution. They have corrupted the courts. They have removed corporal punishment from the schools. (Then again, would you trust today’s teachers to administer discipline in loco parentis?) A wave of rule breaking now coincides with a regime of unprecedented permissiveness. Contracts are not held sacred, honesty is no longer prized as it once was. Employees steal from their employers. Good manners are gone as entertainers commit violent assaults after which they are given awards and standing ovations. In Washington, D.C., the laws are enforced against one party and not another. This is the malaise that grips all Western countries, and it is no accident.
The worldwide communist movement stands at the center of our demoralization. The communists advocate a new kind of morality, which has little regard for honesty, respect for property, family, God or country. Their new morality is anti-racism, universal equality, concern for “the planet,” the championing of sexual deviancy, abortion tending toward infanticide, the redistribution of wealth, and unilateral American disarmament. If someone disagrees with these new ideals, they are trash. And as the left’s revolution advances, the trash is “taken out.”
Through all the confusing rhetoric and mock moralizing about race and gender, we must never lose sight of the communist bloc’s military end-game. There is a strategic method at work behind the communist attack on our morality. If you demoralize a country prior to war, victory is made easier. Therefore, morality in the West has not been attacked for its own sake. It was attacked to smooth the path to victory for the world’s largest country (Russia) and the world’s most populous country (China). What almost nobody has grasped is that these two countries are working together; and they have been working together for a long time with a communist fifth column.
We also find several smaller countries working with Russia and China that are also heavily armed — like North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Angola, Congo, Syria and Iran. Consider, as well, mineral-rich South Africa. The communist bloc is dominant in strategic minerals, oil, natural gas, fertilizer, and nuclear weapons. Yet none of these resources matter if there are no operative moral factors.
The moral decline of a people may be traced out in the moral decline of its leaders. If the United States Congress, once described by Mark Twain as America’s “distinctly native … criminal class,” is now so demoralized that it is as likely to pass laws to destroy the country as to defend it, then what kind of people have we become? Anyone who thinks this is an exaggeration need only look at the House majority’s readiness to let our nuclear deterrent collapse for want of appropriate funding, or the federal government’s disregard for border security.
This may be a simplification, as many factors were at work, but: – Within our very souls, our spiritual flanks were turned long ago; for the real war has been raging in the human heart and mind. This is the war we have been losing, the war that plays out prior to the advent of tanks and jets and missiles and nuclear bombs. We have opened a causeway into pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony and sloth. The dark side of human nature is always evident during a period of decline, during a period of materialism. Think of what a little pink worm will do on a warm day with a cold carcass.
The war that has begun in Eastern Europe has surprised many observers. But the greatest surprise is the fighting spirit of the Ukrainians, who partake of moral factors that the Russian side lacks. One hears the moralizing of Americans who say that Russian prisoners have been murdered or tortured by the Ukrainian side. Such incidents, as regrettable as they are, and as inexcusable, do not unmake the larger moral ledger. Ukraine is fighting for her existence. And this is the same moral position occupied by Finland during the Winter War, or Britain during the blitz, or the Russians from 1941-1943.
“In war,” said Napoleon, “the moral is to the physical as three is to one.” The so-called miracle of Ukraine’s defense against Russia is not a function of Russian incompetence. The so-called miracle in Ukraine is a function of moral factors which lie at the root of the Euromaidan Revolution of 2014.
I have said before that the Russians, if they persevere, will probably break the Ukrainian defense when the ground is dry. Yet Russia must now endure a war of attrition for eight to ten weeks. Does the Russian Army possess the stamina for this? Does Russia possess the necessary moral factors? Despite all that we have heard on television, the Russian troops might prove more resilient than we imagine. Only time will tell. The most important and frequently used method in war, said Carl von Clausewitz, “is to wear down the enemy. That expression is more than a label; it describes the process precisely, and is not so metaphorical as it may seem at first. Wearing down the enemy in a conflict means using the duration of the war to bring about a gradual exhaustion of his physical and moral resistance.” [Book One, Chapter Two]
If Western democracies collaborate with the KGB regime long enough, they are at risk of degrading to the level of backward and corrupt Russia. Western countries can simply lose their democratic political systems to the Mafia, leaving their citizens defenseless in front of that mortal danger.
Alexander Litvinenko, “Allegations,” p. 204
How do we understand the treason of our elites? The fact is, our elites have been compromised by their longstanding partnerships with Moscow and Beijing. The sudden flip of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, almost a decade ago, along with the Democratic Party, toward anti-Russian declamations, should not be taken at face value. There are understandings and relationships hidden from public view. A double game has been played by our “progressives” and those heavily invested in China. Some of them are undoubtedly in shock, at seeing the outbreak of war in eastern Europe. Others are staying the course because they actually believe in socialism and trust in their Chinese “friends.” Some readers may wonder what I am referring to. Let’s take a page from history and reconsider where we have arrived.
Since the Spring of 1988 … the Western consensus of Sovietological opinion has become an automaton intolerant of dissent, even as public debate on the subject has narrowed. The pronouncements of veteran ‘anti-communists,’ once against disoriented by ideological change in Moscow, are a tangle of self-contradiction and self-deception.
Andrei Navrozov, 1991
The more things change, the more they stay the same. And so, confusion reigns again. Navrozov’s brilliant little book, The Coming Order, fell on deaf ears in 1991. In Chronicles Magazine, Arnold Beichman reviewed and debunked Navrozov with a self-satisfied and stupid polemic. In the spring of 1992, I spoke briefly about Beichman’s hit-piece and Navrozov’s book with Patrick J. Buchanan. He responded by saying that he thought Beichman had put Navrozov in his place. I begged to differ. There was something to what Navrozov was saying, I told him. Buchanan’s parting remark was, “Good luck with that.”
Everyone left and no one returned Only, true to the promise of love, My latest, at least you looked back To see the whole sky in blood. The house was cursed, and cursed was my trade; Uselessly, a tender song rang out And I didn’t dare raise my eyes To my terrible fate. They defiled the immaculate Word, They trampled the sacred utterance, So that with the sicknurses of Thirty-seven I could mop the bloody floor. They separated me from my only son, They tortured my friends in prisons, They surrounded me with an invisible Stockade Of well-coordinated shadowing. They rewarded me with muteness That curses the whole cursed world, They force-fed me with scandal, They made me drink poison. And taking me to the very edge, For some reason they left me there. I would rather, as one of the city’s ‘crazies,’ Be wandering through the dying squares.
Such were the sad words of Anna Akhmatova, with her references to ’37 (the Stalin purges), describing her own “terrible fate,” to suffer without being killed herself, to see the “whole sky in blood,” to witness the Stalin regime’s many crimes, taking her to the very edge. And here we are again. The real abomination is that almost nobody sees. They refuse to look. Militantly, self-righteously, with scorn for those of us who can see. Who see through the eyes of Akhmatova.
Four reformers met under a bramble bush. They were all agreed that the world must be changed. ‘We must abolish property,’ said one. ‘We must abolish Marriage,’ said the second. ‘We must abolish God,’ said the third. ‘I wish we could abolish work,’ said the fourth. ‘Do not let us get beyond practical politics,’ said the first. ‘The first thing is to reduce men to a common level.’ ‘The first thing,’ said the second, ‘ is to give freedom to the sexes.’ ‘The first thing,’ said the third, ‘is to find out how to do it.’ ‘The first step,’ said the first, ‘is to abolish the Bible.’ ‘The first thing,’ said the second, is to abolish the laws.’ ‘The first thing,’ said the third, ‘is to abolish mankind.’
Robert Louis Stevenson, “The Four Reformers”
What a devil wants, in the greater scheme of things, is to destroy. There is, in the cosmos, a creative principle. There is, opposing it, a destructive principle. Thus we find, two opposing tendencies behind everything. And you cannot have one without the other. Look at the policies of any leader and ask if these policies tend towards creation or destruction. Will his policies bring prosperity or bankruptcy? Will they bring peace or war?
…in February 2014, Putin’s ‘little green men’ … seized control of Ukraine’s Crimea. Consistent with Putin’s information warfare doctrine, several days prior to the invasion, Russian intelligence services … leaked a private telephone call between Assistant Secretary of State for Russian and European Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. The two U.S. diplomats in the intercepted phone call discussed who would be the best candidate among the top opposition figures, to replace the ousted pro-Russia president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich.
Nothing in the Nuland-Pyatt conversation proves that American officials orchestrated the Euromaidan Revolution. In fact, with all the resources available to Russian intelligence you would think Moscow could have come up with something more substantial than a diplomatic non sequitur. Yet many Americans, convinced of the wickedness of their own country, have treated the Nuland-Pyatt conversation as proof that America stole Ukraine from Russia (as if Ukraine is an easy country to take over).
Six weeks after he became Russia’s defense minister, General Pavel Grachev addressed a June 1992 NATO meeting in Brussels where he defined Russia’s sphere of interest as encompassing all ‘former USSR republics with which it shared territorial borders,’ and claimed that Russia ‘had every right to intervene’ in those territories unilaterally. Subsequently, Russia deployed troops throughout the Caucasus, ‘signed base treaties with Armenia and Georgia’ and ‘posted border troops along much of the former Soviet perimeter.'”
Lawrence Kohn, “Russia’s Turkish Target”
Russia is bringing her Strategic Rocket Forces up to full readiness. Russia is going to be conscripting doctors in the weeks ahead. Russia has prepared for mass burials in anticipation of a catastrophic number of casualties. What is going on here? Amid all this we have Western observers suggesting Putin has failed. One analyst, citing a TASS source, wrote, “Russian President Putin is extremely disappointed with the progress of the military operation in Ukraine.”
…Russia overcame the inertia of collapse and started reviving its power, while the West, being lulled by sweet day-dreams of the liberal ‘end of history,’ castrated its armed forces to the point, when they could be good [only] for leading colonial wars with weak and technically backward enemies. The balance of forces in Europe has thus changed in Russia’s favor.
Pravda, 13 November 2014
The headline of the Pravda article cited above reads, “Russia takes complete advantage of castrated armed forces of the West.” We also read in that same Russian article, “The illusion of world supremacy played a cruel joke on Washington.” We must ask a question here: Who fostered the illusion of American world supremacy? What country supposedly quit the business of nuclear competition, the business of communist subversion, the business of the Cold War? Russia supposedly quit. But they did not quit!
Russia initially did everything it could to make sure these disagreements could be resolved by peaceful means. However, the Kiev officials have conducted two punitive operations on those territories; and, apparently, we are witnessing a third escalation. All these years … the people living on those territories have been literally tortured by constant shelling and blockades.
Vladimir Putin, 21 February 2022
President Vladimir Putin spent months deploying Russian troops around Ukraine, on three sides. Of course, he said Russia was not going to invade Ukraine; and many believed him. Last week, when Putin’s spokesmen announced the Russian troops were standing down, many people believed him. But the troops did not leave their deployments. They moved closer to the border with Ukraine. And then it was alleged that the Ukrainians did a bad, bad thing. So, the Russian troops did not go home as advertised. The troops stayed in position; and on Monday, Putin decided to invade eastern Ukraine. And now Putin has asked the Duma for permission to use the Russian military to attack forces outside of Russia. Some intelligence analysts believe that a general invasion of Ukraine will soon begin.
The event corresponds less to expectations in war than in any other case whatever.
Livy, History of Rome XXX, c. 10
The President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, says that Wednesday will be “the day of the attack.” The Russian Duma will supposedly vote to recognize Luhansk and Donetsk. When that happens, Russian troops will move in to Ukraine.
Key points to follow: (1) The United States is evacuating its Embassy even as Americans have been advised to leave Ukraine; (2) Russian troops have surrounded Ukraine from three different directions (i.e., north, east and south); (3) Russia is demanding that Ukraine promise it will not join NATO; (4) President Zelensky says he will not make this promise; (5) Russian military bases near Ukraine show increased activity with units deploying to attack positions; (6) six Russian amphibious transports have left port in Crimea, moving up Crimea’s west coast, headed for the Ukrainian coast; (7) Russian rocket artillery units seem to be preparing to strike; (8) Ukraine is not seriously preparing to repel an invasion.
Many people today are completely convinced that a new hero of Russian history, as yet unknown, is changing its course … and we cannot comprehend his intentions, since the protagonist himself merges with other characters. Some call him by the foreign term mafia. Others express themselves more plainly in Russian and label him an ugolovnik, a criminal, struggling for power. Still others are disposed to speak of the traits and methods of today’s criminal mafia as bearing the unique stamp of yesterday’s apparatchiks, KGB agents, and influential ‘commanders of the socialist economy,’ especially the chiefs of the military-industrial complex who now occupy key political and economic posts.
At the end of the Cold War, the Russian people demanded an investigation of “secret power structures” controlling politics and the economy. There was the suspicion, by some, that the old Soviet system was somehow perpetuating itself in an underhanded way. How odd this situation was, may be judged by some of the advocates of Soviet liberalization. These advocates included KGB or MVD generals who suddenly cross-dressed as liberals – like MVD Gen. Edward Shevardnadze, KGB Gen. Oleg Kalugin, and then there was the Deputy Mayor of St. Petersburg, KGB Lt. Col. Vladimir Putin. Was the West suddenly willing to put its faith in such “actors”? At the time, of course, everyone thought Russia was all about reform “and the security services were on board.” But as journalist Yevgenia Albats reported in 1994, the “grand proclamation of reform was followed almost immediately by a much less publicized retreat.” What really happened? The Communist Party Soviet Union went underground from whence it continued to control the state and economy through its many “actors” and front-men, including the conveniently Jewish oligarchs like Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Khordorkovsky, and Vladimir Gusinsky. Here was an inside joke perpetrated by the Cheka – effective because antisemitism is the uneducated-man’s Marxism.
The last three months it is organized by both sides … with a clear division of labor. Good cop and bad cop…. This campaign stated that Putin is preparing to activate troops for a full-scale invasion to a big war, for a big war to conquer a substantial portion of Ukraine, with encirclement of major Ukrainian cities. And now we can see that many Western medias are publishing maps showing all these arrows of Russian troops moving into Ukraine territory and conquering that territory that there will be a huge war. Mr. Putin has decided to reinforce these claims. But Putin’s forces are insufficient for what is needed.
I would be cautious about describing the Russian mobilization as an “empty threat.” It is not “empty.” This is the largest mobilization of Russian forces since the end of the Cold War. It is a real threat made with tanks, troops, aircraft and missiles. In his interview with Frank Gaffney, Illarionov’s arguments regarding the Russian deployments were not well-informed or well-considered.
In battle one engages the orthodox and gains victory through the unorthodox.
This interview with Mr. Moric of the Geopolitical and Empire podcast is an attempt to give background on the Soviet long-range strategy, Anatoliy Golitsyn, James Angleton, and the fall of the Soviet Union. It is too big to treat so quickly, but an overview may be useful for some readers who want a snapshot before embarking on more serious reading. To correct an error, I misspoke when I referred to KGB defector Nosenko exonerating Oswald. I meant to say he exonerated Moscow in the death of JFK. Talking has no edits, but it is lively enough to carry you and Mr. Moric added some nice visuals.
Even conservatives are failing to recognize the stakes here, not that … we’re in favor of sending American troops over to defend or die in Ukraine; but … this is a country just like the Republic of China on Taiwan that deserves its independence from … Russia. I mean, what has happened to the conservative movement, Jeff, where even people who claim to be conservatives on Channels like Fox News are failing to stand up for freedom and independence for freedom-loving people?
The Russian government has announced that all four of its fleets will be going to sea soon. Over 140 ships of the Russian Navy, all at one time, will be leaving port. The exact date has not been given as of this writing. Moscow is calling this “a drill.” At the same time, Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping on 4 February.
[American leaders] don’t think the balance of power matters any more…. If you think we’ve had trouble with the Russians, just wait for the trouble we are going to have with the Chinese. I am very popular in China. I go to China quite often. I usually start my talks by saying, ‘It’s good to be back among my people.’ Because when I get to China I’m intellectually more at home there than I am in Washington….
Professor John Mearsheimer, 2016
Will there be a war over Ukraine? Have recent negotiations opened a path to peace? Unfortunately, the diplomats have achieved very little. The White House says no further talks with Russia have been planned.[i] Worse yet, American intelligence officials say that Russia is setting up a pretext to invade Ukraine. On 14 January Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said, “Without getting into too much detail, we do have information that indicates Russia is already working actively to create a pretext for a potential invasion…. In fact, we have information that they have prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct what we call a ‘false flag operation’; an operation designed to look like an attack on … Russian-speaking people … as an excuse to go in.”[ii]
That is something I absolutely reject. The shoot-to-kill order [in Kazakhstan], to the extent it exists, is wrong and should be rescinded.
President Joseph Biden
People have all kinds of odd ideas about the unrest in Kazakhstan. They seem to regard Kazakhstan as an independent country. But it is not. Kazakhstan is a Soviet republic masquerading as an independent country. As such, it is beholden to the Kremlin. In fact, its leaders are Soviet persons. And now that people in Kazakhstan have rebelled against their local government, the country’s leaders have turned to Moscow for security troops. If, by some strange turn of events, Kazakhstan succeeded in asserting its independence, Putin would tell us – as he said about Ukraine – that Kazakhstan “is not a real country.” No. It is part of Moscow’s “near abroad.” In other words, it is a colony of Russia.
In 1943 [Josef Mengele] was appointed by Heinrich Himmler to be chief doctor at Birkenau, the supplementary extermination camp at Auschwitz, where he and his staff selected incoming Jews for labour or extermination and where he supervised medical experiments on inmates to discover means of increasing fertility…. His chief interest, however, was research on twins. Mengele’s experiments often resulted in the death of the subject.
In the ongoing pandemic, America has the highest per capita death rate in the world. Who is to blame? According to Robert Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Anthony Fauci is to blame. In fact, Kennedy describes Fauci as a corrupt government functionary responsible for hundreds of thousands of unnecessary pandemic deaths. And all the while, says Kennedy, Fauci has been lining his own pockets, assuring big profits for pharmaceutical companies. Even more shocking, Kennedy depicts Fauci as an American Mengele – as an administrator who facilitated “barbaric and illegal experiments on children.”[i] According to Kennedy, “Dr. Fauci … has sanctioned drug companies to experiment on at least fourteen thousand children, many of them Black and Hispanic orphans living in foster homes. He permitted these companies to operate without oversight or accountability. Under Dr. Fauci’s laissez faire rubric, these companies systematically abused and, occasionally, killed children.”[ii]
Corruption enters society on a stream of ‘new’ ideas. Perversion gains admittance. The taint spreads. Venality and dishonesty are doubled — then redoubled. Immorality reigns. The honest man is punished for telling the truth. The legions abandon the frontier.
J.R. Nyquist, The Fool and His Enemy
As we approach the year 2022 it is appropriate to review what has happened over the past year and consider where we are headed. This discussion offers an overview that may offend and shock. I make no apology for that. Time is running out. It is time for all Americans to set their illusions aside. Name your enemy, See the big picture. Get clarity.
…between the ‘grey’ and the ‘red’ terror there may be an intermediate period — the ‘pink’ terror, when active military operations have not yet begun and there is still peace, but when some of the best spetsnaz units have already gone into action.
The Interview below is on the Soviet long range strategy. It begins with an introduction in German, but quickly switches to English after the first couple of minutes. Dave, Fabio and I are each broadcasting from a different continent.
If the physically unreal, namely the mind, defines all our reality, surely that which is finally true ought to be of a metaphysical, ephemeral, abstract, nonphysical nature, rather than of a ‘hard,’ enforced, verifiable one.
Nigel Kerner Grey Aliens and the Harvesting of Souls 
Both views, the materialistic as well as the spiritualistic, are metaphysical prejudices. It accords better with experience to suppose that living matter has a psychic aspect, and the psyche has a physical aspect.
Carl Jung Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Sky 
Demonology is not just another crackpot-ology. It is the ancient and scholarly study of the monsters and demons who have seemingly coexisted with man throughout history. Thousands of books have been written on the subject, many of them authored by educated clergymen, scientists, and scholars, and uncounted numbers of well-documented demonic events are readily available to every researcher. The manifestations and occurrences described in this imposing literature are similar.”
We are living in a materialist age. Even religious people believe in “evolution” and “science.” Reality is said to coincide with matter. Spirit is said to coincide with superstition. The mind is said to be epiphenomenal, the illusion of consciousness owing to chemical reactions in the brain. It is assumed that when the brain dies, the mind is extinguished. All favored solutions are material solutions. We rarely stop to consider that our “material world” was long ago negated by the Second Law of Thermodynamics (i.e., entropy). Material reality is dying. It has always been dying. Therefore, the material universe could not have always existed; that is, unless something nonphysical (i.e., spiritual) has always been there to sustain it.
Belief in manmade global warming depends on acting as if the laws of physics are suspended and we are living in special time in which the climate is unchanging apart from the hand of man. In a sense we actually are living in a special time relative to the last 3 million years, which has been an ice age. The special time we live in is an interglacial period — a temporary respite in the ice age.
David Archibald, The Twilight of Abundance
A cold wave hits Europe. Spain has to restart its coal plants. Siberia suffers 68 below zero temperatures on December 2. Record spring temperatures are recorded in Antarctica. Russia and China are husbanding their water and fertilizer resources. Fertilizer shortages begin to be felt in the United States and other countries. What is happening? How do we understand it? I decided to resume my discussion on global cooling with David DuByne of Adapt 2030. By popular demand….
A prince also wins prestige for being a true friend or a true enemy, that is, for revealing himself without any reservation in favor of one side against another. This policy is always more advantageous than neutrality.”
Machiavelli has been credited with wisdom, after a modern fashion. In the passage quoted above, the Florentine sage claimed that being a true friend or a true enemy is always more advantageous. But there is a problem with this advice: How would Machiavelli explain the success of Swiss neutrality through two world wars? Of course, he cannot. The fact is, Machiavelli’s writings are full of maxims that do not prove to be true. So why is he celebrated as an important figure? My own answer is that Machiavelli became important because his cynicism was so incredibly naïve, and he dared to immortalize it in prose. It is not that he wrote the truth; rather, he told us how “cynical people think.” And this is a valuable corrective to naive idealism.
In the technique of subliminal contradiction, two mutually incompatible bits of information are simultaneously projected into the perception of the victim without the contradiction being either pointed out or explained. In the technique of deferred closure, inexplicable data are continually fed to the victim … over a period of time, data that always suggest the possibility of a rational explanation but never quite allow it.
In Charles Upton’s remarkable little volume, titled The Alien Disclosure Deception: The Metaphysics of Social Engineering, the author discusses sophisticated techniques of psychological warfare used by governments. These include the technique of subliminal contradiction and the technique of deferred closure. Each is designed to attack the human mind’s need for rational closure. A mind that cannot achieve closure, he warned, “will react to the continued frustration of one of its most basic needs either by sinking into stunned exhaustion, or by producing a paranoid, delusional form of closure.”[i]
Primarily coal industry and oil and gas industry, a lot of smaller players in that industry are going to probably go bankrupt in short order – at least we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change.”
Saule Omarova, Biden’s Treasury pick
There are two major totalitarian agendas at work today. One is vaccine mandates (and passports), while the other is climate change. These two agendas are connected, but not as you might imagine. They are connected because the planet is about to experience cooling instead of warming. This cooling will be caused by the Grand Solar Minimum that began last year. Food production will be seriously disrupted by weather, and already has been affected in some regions. In other words, we are headed for a global famine. Humanity is going to suffer a massive die-off. I strongly suspect the pandemic, the vaccine mandates, and the vaccine passports are related to this impending situation.
Histories are as perfect as the Historian is wise … and … the grand difference between a Dryasdust and a sacred Poet, is very much even this…. When both oblivion and memory are wise, when the general soul of man is clear, melodious, true, there may come a modern Iliad as memorial of the Past: when both are foolish, and the general soul is overclouded with confusions, with unveracities and discords, there is a ‘Rushworthian chaos.’ Let Dryasdust be blamed….
Thomas Carlyle, “Anti-Dryasdust”
History is not everything that happens. History, said Carlyle, consists in the worthwhile – not the trivial. Because history is about meaningful things, it must be oriented to what things mean, what they signify, portend, and lead to. Understanding history does not involve knowing every last detail of an event. It does not require us to know what the peasant had for lunch. True history is discovered through a process of sifting. The true historian, it turns out, must possess skills similar to those of an intelligence analyst (or detective). The historian and the intelligence analyst must sift a large mass of data. In the end, both must find the underlying Truth. The historian seeks the key to a historical narrative while the intelligence analyst seeks to understand enemy strategy. Sometimes the key to the historical narrative is the enemy strategy.[ii]
While Weaver loved the South with a fierce passion, he avoided one of the besetting sins of the heirs of the Agrarians: a constricting sectionalism that thrives on the belief that all would have been well south of the Potomac had the Confederacy bested the Union Armies. Weaver perceived that the infirmities of modern Western civilization transcended the dichotomy between North and South.
Who is Julius Evola? His career was many-sided: As a philosopher he belongs among the leading representatives of Italian Idealism … to some he might appear as an èminence grise in politics, for Mussolini apparently wanted to implement some of Evola’s ideas to create more freedom from the restrictions of National Socialism … and many of his books testify to his understanding of alchemy and magic, and it is reported that Mussolini stood in considerable awe of Evola’s ‘magical powers.’”
When a thinker says civilization has taken the wrong road, when he says civilization is in the process of disintegrating, when his political sympathies lie with a defeated power that tried to establish a different pattern of civilization, then that thinker is a pariah. He stands outside the circle of “received wisdom.” What, then, can we learn from him? Being an outsider, he sometimes sees what the rest of us have missed. Some of his views may be repellant, or outrageous, yet he should not be ignored; for those who find themselves standing outside a civilization are not entangled in the conceits of that civilization, or engaged in the deceptive flattery that feeds it. The thinker who stands outside civilization, who suffers intellectual exile, may be civilization’s only honest critic. He may, in fact, be honest and courageous enough to pour cold water over our heads and cry “shame.” Why, indeed, would he do such a thing? There is never any money is such a career. Everyone and everything, in fact, is moving further and further from him. Whatever his failings or missteps, he has his little corner of truth. Wariness is advised in approaching him, of course. One should never approach pariahs uncritically. One approaches them to learn truths that we have exiled. One approaches them with one burning question: What have we failed to see?
Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that COVID-19 could not have evolved in nature and, therefore, must have been created in a laboratory, it came as no surprise that U.S. intelligence agencies released an inconclusive report about its origin.
It should come as no surprise that America’s intelligence agencies are clueless, because these agencies recruit their analysts and managers from America’s colleges and universities. As institutions go, our colleges and universities specialize in cluelessness. A university degree is, in fact, training in how notto see. Why has this happened? “The essential thing has gone out of the entire system of higher education,” wrote Friedrich Nietzsche in 1888. How did it happen? A political ideal, Nietzsche explained, has been substituted for intellectual cultivation.
…generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children, that … this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow, and our planet began to heal.
Barack Obama, 2008
You can tell how dangerous a politician is by the grandiosity of his statements. As Jim Simpson points out in his latest book, Marxist politicians who hide their Marxism under benign-sounding slogans, are among the most grandiose and dangerous. Listen to their bragging and you will hear of their magical abilities – to change the weather, to lower sea level, to cure sickness and poverty. Such claims are self-aggrandizing, to be sure. Promising people free health care, free jobs, free money, etc., is a path to power, after all. And isn’t power like magic? Yet, that same power prefigures massive taxation and the plundering of private citizens, the shuttering of businesses, the degradation of healthcare. It is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
His life … is a piece of the everlasting heart of Nature herself: all men’s life is, – but [the] weak [who are] many know not the fact, and are untrue to it, in most times; the strong few are strong, heroic, perennial, because it cannot be hidden from them.
The hero is concerned with seeing. The villain is merely concerned with the manipulation of appearances. What an accomplishment it is, indeed, to see behind the foliage of “appearances.” Truth has its camouflage, its bodyguard of lies (if Churchill’s paradox is admitted). Truth is also a moving target, and a living thing, said Plato; never wholly captured by men even in animated discourse. On the other hand, a lie needs no discourse at all; for repetition is not discourse. Being easier than truth, a lie prevails with those who want everything to be easy. This is why modernity prefers “experts.” As Socrates once said of experts, “They will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome, having the reputation of knowledge without the reality.”[i]
People who live according to a falsified picture of the world sooner or later receive sharp blows….
Richard M. Weaver
Here is an interview I did with Nevin Gussack earlier this week. We discussed my analysis of Chinese strategy vs. Taiwan and the United States, how Art Bell was instrumental in encouraging me 23 years ago, and we also discussed why capitalism seems to be failing in the West.
We are a free country and we will remain free, even at the sacrifice of our lives.
On 21 October 2021, Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the arrest and extradition (from the United States) of journalist Allan dos Santos of Terça Livre TV. What was Allan’s crime? He knew the Court was corrupt, and he had information on felonies committed by two of the Court’s justices. Determined to survive in place, these justices have created a new set of interpretations relating to the Brazilian Constitution. Their plan has been to wage war on something they call “fake news.” They have used their newly acquired powers to silence media criticism. But especially, they want to silence Allan dos Santos.
Who are our enemies, and who are our friends? This question is one of primary importance in the revolution. All past revolutionary struggles in China achieved very little, basically because the revolutionaries were unable to unite their real friends to attack their real enemies.
Mao Zedong, founder of Communist China “Analysis of Classes in Chinese Society”
We have to make sure that we deter China on every front, and Taiwan is obviously critical. But most important, we must deter China in a way that does not unbalance our overall strategic position – which faces Russia in Europe and Iran in the Middle East (not to mention Cuba and Venezuela in the Caribbean). To understand our strategic position, it is worth keeping Chinese Grand Strategy in mind. The debate on Chinese grand strategy is difficult because China has successfully hidden its ultimate grand strategic direction and objectives. And so, we are left judging by actions. But actions can also be misleading.Even invasion preparations can be misleading.
….Mao believes in the Marxist-Leninist theory that war is inevitable, but maintains that he is convinced that the capitalist powers, not the communist countries, will eventually launch a war in a desperate, last-ditch struggle to prevent communism from taking over the world by peaceful means.
Several years ago, I received text messages from a man in Brazil named Allan dos Santos. He was a student of Olavo de Carvalho, and wanted to start a podcast with me. He asked if I could get Diana West to join our first broadcast. On his side, Allan would get Olavo to join us. We would discuss how communism was threatening to take over Brazil and America. Diana and Olavo agreed to join us for a rousing discussion. The broadcast was a success. We had over 10,000 views in two or three days. Most of our listeners were Brazilians who understood English. Allan’s broadcasting efforts grew from there.
Though this be madness, yet there is method in it.
We now live in a nation where generals destroy military readiness, doctors destroy health, airlines destroy air travel, the Justice Department destroys justice, and now we have a vaccine that does not vaccinate. The COVID-19 vaccines were supposed to eradicate COVID-19, but now that hundreds of millions are vaccinated the virus is killing more people than ever. Worse yet, the global economy is breaking under the strain. But the “leaders” of West are relentless; – especially President Biden, who has compared the experimental COVID vaccines to vaccines for polio, measles, mumps, etc. We want a cure, right? Biden says the vaccines are the cure. But the numbers suggest otherwise.
If the ruler loves to use his knowledge to alter the laws, constantly manipulates public matters for his personal benefit, alters and changes the regulations and prohibitions, and frequently issues all sorts of directives, the state can be destroyed.
Han Fei-tzu, “Precursors to Extinction”
Are we in the end-game of an East vs. West Cold War that never really ended? If so, how might we tell who is winning? In The Tao of Spycraft: Intelligence Theory and Practice in Traditional China, Chapter 14 covers the topic of political intelligence, with a subsection titled “Signs of a Doomed State.” Here we read classic commentaries from ancient Chinese sages. Some of the warning signs might be applied to China, others might be applied to America. Are both countries doomed?
It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
In Dan Kurzman’s fine book, Subversion of the Innocents, we learn that Stalin’s strategy in the early Cold War proved inferior to Mao Zedong’s strategy. Mao’s program was called “The Yenan Way” and relied on a special kind of deception. It was all about disguising communists as agrarian reformers. It involved winning over middle class opportunists, businessmen and the intelligentsia. In primitive areas of the world, like Africa, Mao realized that communist ideology did not matter – so there was every reason to ignore Marxist doctrines. Everything was reduced to anti-Americanism or anti-European imperialism. As Kurzman explained, “The central purpose of the Yenan Way is actually not so much to gain mass support as to win over influential noncommunist ‘friends,’ particularly in the political field, who can open channels for infiltration in the highest councils of the nation. Such friends are obtained by any means that will work – lies, flattery, threats, blackmail, bribery, or outright purchase.”[i]
Throughout the stagnation period [under Brezhnev], not to mention the cult [of Stalin] era, people were afraid to say anything that conflicted with the ‘supreme’ opinion, learning only one thing – to vote unanimously for anything. We would take comfort from the fact that we were doing the same as everyone else. We were only bold when it came to political anecdotes…. Now we are only just learning to speak the truth.
V. Matveyenko As quoted in Izvestiya 12 March 1988[i]
What happens to the truth when people are silenced? What happens after the government has extorted something vital from a nation – from its warrior class – by threatening people’s jobs, livelihoods, and freedom of movement? Once you have been intimidated into taking an experimental injection because you are “afraid to say anything,” or incapable of standing up, that is the end of your liberty. Your governors can ride roughshod over you and they know it. In that situation, only one comfort remains; namely, that you are doing what everyone else is doing.
This is the tale of a tragic dynasty; a narrative of hatred, honor, courage, of virtue, love, ideals and wickedness, and of a war so terrible, it marked the threshold between one age and the next.
In Judaism and Christianity, we have a snake in the Garden of Eden. In ancient Babylon the chief god was Marduk, whose animal symbol was a snake-dragon. In ancient India, there was a snake named Takshaka, who poisoned and killed King Parikshit. Seeking revenge, the dead king’s son decided on revenge and built a furnace. The Mahabharata states: “Serpents by the million, of every color … fell hissing, terrified, into the furnace.” The “devout son” of a “snake woman,” named Astika, was implored by his mother to save his kin. The young man was a “brahmin [intellectual] child of great sweetness,” who won the king’s heart. Name anything you might want, said the king. “Stop the [snake] sacrifice,” said Astika. And so, the snakes were saved. [i]
The irony of Alex Jones … is that his behavior reduces the probability that an actual conspiracy could be uncovered. Like if Jones were in a hotel and repeatedly pulled the fire alarm when there really was a fire [so] nobody would leave.
There are people who know how to win a large audience. One such character is Alex Jones. Nearly every day someone sends me feed from Alex Jones, or an article from his site. His popularity is astounding. Arguing against Jones is almost useless. After all, in America you are not supposed to argue with “success.” Mr. Injury then asks the question, “Why not imitate Jones? Why not propagate a more thrilling narrative yourself? Let’s face it, writing about communist subversion is old hat. It is boring.” – To which I respond with a decided groan. – “Don’t be defensive,” says Mr. Insult after Mr. Injury. What?!Am I running a candy shop? My interlocutor then asks, “Why not use a spoonful of sugar to help that medicine go down? Remember the Mary Poppins song?”
Even the bravest of us rarely has the courage for what he knows…
In his small, strange little book, Twilight of the Idols, Nietzsche discussed the “problem of Socrates,” starting from the premise that “the great sages are declining types.” He suggested that Socrates and Plato were “symptoms of decay” and “agents of the dissolution of Greece.” In fact, he claimed they were “pseudo-Greek [and] anti-Greek.” Of course, Nietzsche saw a parallel with modernity. He saw that modern thinkers have also proven to be declining types. In fact, our thinkers, our intellectuals, have busied themselves with destroying civilization through the “organization of political hatreds.”
Linked in this paragraph is my 30 August appearance on Patriots In Tune with Jules Jones and Toots Sweet. Towards the end of the interview I appear with a puppet named Donkey Dem. Click on the Patriots In Tune link and scroll down to the August 30 show mid-interview. Jules and Toots begin the show by discussing the news. I arrive during first few minutes of the second hour. Don’t miss the puppet performance. It’s always fun to join Jules and Toots. Watch for free by registering your email: https://patriotsintune.net/archives/
As a postcript, my friend Donkey Dem was so jazzed at his appearance on Patriots in Tune, he is working on a solo performance for our next exciting episode. He will be singing the Stalin Anthem. Can you imagine?
During several of the summer months of 1783, when the effect of the sun’s rays to heat the earth in these northern regions should have been the greatest, there existed a constant fog over all of Europe, and a great part of North America. This fog was of a permanent nature; it was dry, and the rays of the sun seemed to have little effect toward dissipating it, as they easily do to a moist fog, arising from water. They were indeed rendered so faint of a burning, they would scarce kindle brown paper. Of course, their summer effect in heating the earth was exceedingly diminished.
Benjamin Franklin, 1784 Aftermath of the 1783 Laki eruption In Iceland
Is global warming real, or are we facing global cooling? I had the pleasure of interviewing David DuByne on Saturday, September 11. David has been talking about the coming of a mini Ice Age. He also knows a great deal about changes in the Earth’s electromagnetic field, food supply issues, farming, and theories regarding catastrophic earth changes. One of the big questions is whether the Chinese and Russians have advanced knowledge of these climate changes. If so, are there strategic ramifications?
What the world really wants is flattery, and it does not matter how much of it is a lie; but the world at the same time also wants the right to disguise [the flattering lie], so that the fact of being lied to can easily be ignored. As I enjoy being affirmed in my whims and praised for my foibles, I also expect credibility to make it easy for me to believe … everything I hear, read, absorb, and watch….
Here are four requirements for selling a narrative to Americans: (1) It must be easy to grasp; (2) it should require no independent checking; (3) it must flatter existing preconceptions; and (4) it must be forwarded by celebrities.
Blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed.
Alexander Pope, Letter to John Gay 6 October 1727
The day before yesterday Joe Biden said, “Last night in Kabul, the United States ended twenty years of war in Afghanistan; the longest war in American history. We completed one of the biggest airlifts in history, with more than 120,000 people evacuated to safety. That number is more than double what most experts thought were possible.”
Slander injures three: the slanderer, the person who hears the slander, and the person slandered.
The Talmud (Arachn), c. 200
Tom Trento and I discuss the failed Lindell cyber symposium, the fake data of Dennis Montgomery and Brannon Howse’s post-symposium reaction against Tom, myself and John Guandolo for trying to warn Mike Lindell. “Our job today,” said Tom, “is not ad hominem attacks against Mike Lindell or Brannon Howse … I think … we’re trying to do a very difficult job.” That job is to find the truth, to correct the errors, to find a way forward.
We have the lie of 100,000 people successfully evacuated from Afghanistan. We have the lie of only 240-250 Americans left behind when there are thousands. We have the lie of the 90,000 they will bring into the country in lieu of the 90,000 they failed to rescue.
Anonymous Intelligence Veteran
The following article was submitted to me two days ago by an anonymous intelligence veteran involved in the Afghanistan airlift. After fifteen days in the belly of the beast, seeing how everything was organized/disorganized and reorganized, our source begin to catch a definite smell. – J.R. Nyquist
Men in general judge by their eyes rather than by their hands; because everyone is in a position to watch, few are in a position to come in close touch with you. Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are. And those few dare not gainsay the many who are backed by the majesty of the state.
Below are links to order some of my books. My new publisher in Brazil, Livraria Danubio Editora, has published selected writings from 2020-2021 under the title The Lies We Believe In: China, Russia and the Communist Revolution (As Mentiras Em Que Acreditamos: China, Russia e a Revolucao Communista). I am told that the translation is excellent. They even produced a commercial for the book:
We adapted a technology whereby individual [ricin] protein molecules are encapsulated within a thin polymer shell, termed nanocapsules. These nanocapsules can effectively enter the cells, owing to the positive charge on their surface and release their [ricin] protein cargo due to the ‘proton-sponge’ effect…. One unique advantage of this nanocapsule platform is its flexibility. By altering the chemical properties of the nanocapsule surface, one can modulate critical factors such as cell surface affinity, immunogenicity, release rates of its cargo, circulation time and biodistribution.”
Specific elimination of Latently HIV-1 Infected Cells Using HIV-1 Protease-Sensitive Toxin Nanocapsules 
The four authors of the above-quoted article are, Yang Liu, Jing Wen, Jie Li and Yiming Xie. I pass over, for the moment, the Chinese ethnicity of the authors. Their study was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The bio-warfare implications of this research should not escape our notice. The article was submitted for publication in November 2015 and published in April 2016 (available in the notes below). The article states that ricin toxin can be wrapped within a nanocapsule and used in non-lethal doses to target specific cells within the body.
Friends with blogs warned me not to offer a comment section. It was good advice they gave. But I started a comment section anyway. And it has been valuable at times. Only now there is a lot of growling and threats, and a big chunk has been taken out of me. And too much valuable time has been lost. So how do you shoot Old Yeller?
As one views modern man in his innumerable exhibitions of irresponsibility and defiance, one may discern, if he has the courage to see what he sees … a prodigious egotism.”
Richard M. Weaver
The West’s decline into “fragmentation,” said Weaver, owes much to an inner disintegration of soul, an egotism without any sense of proportion. Weaver then quoted Plato’s statement that, “the excessive love of self is in reality the source to each man of all offenses; for the lover is blinded about the beloved, so that he judges wrongly of the just, the good, and the honorable, and thinks that he ought to prefer his own interest to the truth.” With these words the ancient philosopher has given us an insight into the collapse of empires and the fall of mighty men; and also, an insight into the fall of a pillow salesman from Minnesota named Mike Lindell.
We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and these other powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety.
The Monroe Doctrine, 1823
According to Marcell Felipe, the protests in Cuba are “a rejection of socialism and communism.” In the United States we are told a different story. It is, they say, all about COVID-19 and vaccine availability. What is the truth? Marcell Felipe says, “No one is protesting COVID-19. People are asking specifically for freedom.” People are chanting, “Down with the dictatorship!”
Mike Lindell … could do so much good. He has got so much wealth. He could be our George Soros…. Instead, he is sinking millions and millions of dollars into these videos and this upcoming Symposium on alleged cyber-warfare from China. I fear … it is just going to be money down the crapper.
As the Lindell Cyber Symposium has begun, it is worth reviewing what we know in the midst of so much disinformation from right and left. Cliff asked me why Lindell’s information is not to be believed. I told him that the ultimate source of Lindell’s information, of course, is serial fraudster Dennis Montgomery. I asked Cliff, furthermore, that “If [China] wanted to change our election, would they do it so obviously that we could trace their computers back to their own country?” This does not make sense.
Post Script: From Backstage
The word from backstage at the Cyber Symposium in South Dakota is that the cyber experts are unhappy. Expert Robert Graham is reporting, on Twitter, “they are not allowing pcap experts to analyze this data.” The “proof” is not in the pudding. In fact, the whole thing IS A PUDDING. Such a shame. Such a waste of effort.
Dear Herr Professor, when it comes to it I too would very much prefer a professorial chair in Basel [University] to being God; but I did not dare to go as far in my private egoism as to refrain for its sake from the creation of the world … being condemned to entertain the next eternity with bad witticisms.
Friedrich Nietzsche to Jacob Burckhardt Letter of 6 January 1889
It is a tragic fact that Nietzsche was ill, and this illness famously resolved itself into madness. Yet, despite his errors, his contradictions, his contribution to modernity’s moral malaise, he kept one foot planted in the camp of civilization. A part of him struggled against nihilism. At odd intervals he looked forward to the reconstruction of civilization — even allowing (in one passage) that the “death of God” was “only a rumor”; that he himself could believe in God, as long as it was a “dancing God.” In his madness, indeed, Nietzsche said he would have rather been a professor at Basel University than God.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to ‘clean up’ America and reserve America for our use….”
General Chi Haotian, 2003 Secret Speech
China’s defense minister, General Chi Haotian, looked at his desk calendar. On Saturday the Year of the Goat begins, he thought. The goat means luck. But I was born in the Year of the Snake – the “little dragon.” The skin of the snake is always cool, hiding a fervent heart. Chi looked out the window of his Defense Ministry Office at the smoggy Beijing skyline. The time was going by very quickly. He was scheduled to retire in March. How does an old snake retire? A copy of Sun Tzu’s Art of War sat on his desk. I will read classics, he thought to himself. Another book also sat on his desk. It was a volume of essays by Mao Zedong. He turned to the first section of the book, “Analysis of the Classes in Chinese Society.”
In 1960, a secret directive was issued by the KGB in Moscow to the intelligence service’s representatives abroad and the security service at home on the influencing of foreign visitors to the Soviet Union, especially politicians and scholars; efforts were made to use, recruit, and discredit anticommunist politicians, journalists, scholars, and analysts of communist affairs during their visits to communist countries.
The common element in all of this is the degeneration of language into an instrument of rape. It does contain violence, albeit in latent form. And precisely this is one of the lessons recognized by Plato through his own experience with the sophists of his time, a lesson he sets before us as well. This lesson, in a nutshell, says: the abuse of political power is fundamentally connected with the sophistic abuse of the word, indeed, finds in it the fertile soil in which to hide and grow and get ready, so much so that the latent potential of the totalitarian poison can be ascertained, as it were, by observing the symptom of the public abuse of language. The degradation, too, of man through man … by all tyrannies, has its beginnings … when the word loses its dignity.
In this age of “technicity,” “sociology,” and “economics,” many people do not take ideas seriously. Instead of ideas, they have catchwords. Everything is resolved into one catchword; and that catchword is “science.” The Marxists and their fellow travelers have claimed “science” as their very own; that is, they claim the social sciences, climate science, and medical science (regarding viruses, vaccines, lock-downs, etc.).
You in the West, you think you are playing chess with us, but you are never going to win because we are not following any rules.
Russian mobster to his lawyer Catherine Belton, Putin’s People
Forty years ago, a serious long-term problem confronting Moscow was the USSR’s fast-growing Muslim population. It was then speculated that the Soviet Union’s high Muslim birthrate would turn the USSR into a majority Muslim country by the middle of the twenty-first century. It is a strange joke, and more than a curious twist of fate, that NATO faces this same prospect today.
I’ve stuck by my beliefs, I’m not going to change.
Since last November the country has been divided about the election. Roughly a third of the population believes the election was stolen from President Donald Trump. About 59 percent disagree with this assertion, with 9 percent saying they do not know. This division of the country is no ordinary one. If this question is not settled by rational inquiry, America could break into two countries – or revert to a one-party dictatorship – a regime of threats and punishments.
Don Quixote sets out alone as a man, a traveling knight, who in the spirit of the tale of chivalry wants to help the humble to what is their right…. Since he departs alone, the matter turns out relatively well, because when he comes to this famous inn and wants to be dubbed knight there, the innkeeper and his staff enter into Don Quixote’s tomfoolery and play the dubbing of a knight with him…. Then he returns home highly satisfied. [It] goes relatively well, as long as he is alone and others benevolently enter into the tomfoolery. So let the buffoon go; he is a buffoon!
Eric Voegelin, “Hitler and the Germans”
Voegelin’s discourse on Don Quixote appears in a book titled Hitler and the Germans. This is no accident, for Hitler was Germany’s buffoon – posing as Germany’s savior. Buffoonish antics, in history, often entail serious consequences. Today we have a new set of buffoons, on the left and on the right. Therefore, nobody should be caught off guard by what is coming. But they will be caught of guard for the very simple reason that they have not been paying close attention. Everything “goes relatively well,” wrote Voegelin, “as long as … others benevolently enter into the tomfoolery.” We are beyond that now. Others are not “benevolently” entering into it. Quite the opposite.
The intentionality of consciousness toward objects would not in itself lead to fallacious images of reality if man’s participation were automatic, producing in consciousness correct images of reality and nothing beyond that. Consciousness has a dimension of freedom, however, as it designs its images of reality. In this dimension are found such disparate phenomena as … private worldviews of the liberal bourgeois, and constructions of ideological systems. Within this wide range of problems we are here directly concerned only with the possibility of the separation of form and contents of reality, for it is in separation that the phenomena of the loss of reality originate.
China and Russia are on the move, America is in retreat.
In this wide-ranging discussion touching on Mathew Lohmeier’s book, Irresistible Revolution. Cliff and I discuss the controversy surrounding the vaccine, the shifting positions of Turkey, Afghanistan, Iraq and Israel.
Conventional methodology tends to regard a secret source as reliable if the information it provides is broadly compatible with other information openly available; conversely, a source reporting information that conflicts with the generally accepted view of the situation in the communist world may be discounted or rejected. In the absence of disinformation, this methodology would be valid. But the Shelepin Report of May 1959 marked the introduction of a systematic program of disinformation.
Anatoliy Golitsyn, KGB defector
On 16 June a prominent U.S.-based Chinese dissident, Han Lianchao, passed along a rumor that Dong Jingwei, vice minister at China’s Ministry of State Security, had defected to the United States. The next day, Conservative media RedState claimed that Dong Jingwei had indeed defected to the Defense Intelligence Agency with information on COVID-19’s origins. China officially denies these reports and rumors. What is the truth behind this alleged defection? Here is my discussion with Cliff Kincaid on the subject.
Once upon a time there was a swamp; and in this swamp was a toad named Dennis “the Kraken.” It is a curious thing for a small and grotesque amphibian to bear such an exalted nickname; yet this toad could bloat himself to several hundred times his normal size, taking the shape of a legendary cephalopod from Scandinavian folklore – the terrorizer of fjords and sea lanes – known in Old Norse as the Kraki. When bloated to Kraken size, Dennis was outfitted with artificial tentacles “fanning” out in every direction. But his tentacles were not his own; for Dennis was only a puffed-out toad made to look like a Kraken, with the insignia of a three-letter agency tattooed on his caboose.
Infiltrator – noun, a person who secretly becomes part of a group in order to get information or to influence the way the group thinks or behaves.
They look like you. They talk like you. It is assumed that they think like you. Only they are nothing like you. They are the infiltrators. Their job is to infiltrate an agency, a political party, a medical lab, or the White House. In fact, our society has been infiltrated at many levels; but who bothers to notice? Some infiltrators are assigned to approach important people: businessmen, politicians, broadcasters, high-level bureaucrats. If the person in question is important enough, infiltrators come up from the floorboards, through the ceiling, and from the four walls. It is infiltration by encirclement.
“The community of language gives one access to significances at which he cannot otherwise arrive.”
Richard M. Weaver
Perhaps I talked too much, but Seth has a good-natured easy-going style of interviewing. Here is an attempt to grapple with the question of why China and Russia are preparing for war, how America is being divided, and serious trouble ahead.
We’ve got a biological war going on. The Chinese are telling their people to get ready for nuclear war. The Russians are getting ready…. These are all pre-war signs. They [the Russians] are getting rid of [the dollars in their] sovereign funds; and then you have these mass assassinations, these drone attacks in Mexico…. This is very important for them, for pre-positioning [small units of Spetsnaz] troops.
To achieve victory in a future war, it will not be sufficient to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them very accurately on target; it will also be necessary that the ground forces be able to move rapidly into regions which have been subjected to nuclear strikes. Only when this problem is solved will it be possible to speak of the effective exploitation of nuclear strikes by tanks and infantry in conclusively defeating the enemy, or of carrying out extensive maneuvers and decisive advances in depth.
Soviet Military Strategy, [p. 343]
In 1990 I spoke with a Mexican gun runner. We met at the house of a someone we both knew. The Mexican placed a loaded gun on the table and spoke expansively about his “love” of mankind, his Cuban drinking buddies in Mexico, and the future destruction of the United States. There was an unmistakable Marxist element in the gunrunner’s far-left worldview. It was clear from our conversation that he hated America and he loved communist Cuba.
Western desire for convergence between the communist and noncommunist systems, is, by and large, sincere. There is genuine, intense, and legitimate concern about the avoidance of an East-West nuclear conflict.
Anatoliy Golitsyn, KGB defector
In this interview with Nevin Gussack we hear Nevin ask the question, “How has this country [America] managed to survive?” It is not a trivial question. America believed the Russian lies and dropped her guard. We elected “stealth socialists” to office. We allowed our nuclear forces to become obsolete. Now China and Russia are emerging with a military preponderance. How did we get here? Where is this headed?
The Hong Kong Independence Party (HKIP) has been opposed to the Chinese Communist Party’s takeover of Hong Kong. I recently had the opportunity to interview spokesmen of the HKIP, Thomas Fong, K.C. Wong, and John Lee. These gentlemen have a compelling case to make for Hong Kong’s independence. They have direct experience in battling Chinese communism and know the tactics of the CCP better than many “experts” in the West. They offer us a warning about China. At the same time, they pose a question: Will the West stand up for Hong Kong?
Renato Cristin is a professor of hermeneutic philosophy at the University of Trieste, Italy. He is the promoter of a worldwide campaign to conduct a “Nuremberg” trial against communism. This was an idea of Professor Cristin’s friend, the late Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, who believed that a trial of communism was necessary if only to confront the world with communism’s many unpunished crimes. Cristin has a unique way of explaining the collapse of communism. It is a collapse, he says, in which the Iron Curtain was replaced with emerging communist movements in every Western country. Now every country is split within itself. In this process, the communists no longer use their old labels as before. He offers us a striking example of anti-communists being marginalized at the end of the Cold War (instead of Marxists being marginalized). Professor Cristin describes the system of the Chinese Communist Party as a mix of communism and capitalism. He does not mention the revolutionary/strategic significance of Lenin’s NEP or Deng Xiaoping’s Four Modernizations. Even so, he recognizes the communist ideology at the heart of the Chinese ruling system. Here is the reason for the ruling party’s many crimes. Cristin’s emphasis on the immoral nature of communism deserves special appreciation. Please read his words with careful attention
Becoming aware of the Marxist conquest of American society, one will never again look at things in the same way. Mainstream media, social media, the public education system, including the university, as well as federal agencies have all become vessels of various schools of thought that are rooted in Marxist ideology….
Lieutenant Colonel Mathew Lohmeier was (until last week) an active-duty Space Force commander worried about Marxism in the U.S. military. Lohmeier knows, from firsthand, that Marxism has established a foothold in the U.S. Defense Department; so he wrote a book titled Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military. Since Marxism has taken hold of the upper management of the U.S. military, it is only natural that Lohmeier would be stripped of command and “investigated” for “partisan political activity.”
I am one of the most censored people in the United States, suffering at the hands of the radical left; but also conservatives, “responsible conservatives,” who don’t like my views … that I am pro-vaccine…. I am in support of what President Trump did with his Operation Warp Speed. I think it’s a tremendous American achievement.
Cliff’s work has been worth following for many years. Cliff and I had an interesting discussion off-air, prior to our broadcast, about the vaccine. I expressed my reservations and he expressed his confidence in American science. Whatever our differences might be, Cliff is one of those rare journalists who knows that Russia and China are working against the United States. Here is our discussion:
MIRACLE, n. An act or event out of the order of nature and unaccountable, as beating a normal hand of four kings and an ace with four aces and a king.
Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary
Readers have asked for an update from German author Leo H. DeGard, who tapped me twenty years ago for inclusion in his book, Who is Planning the Third World War: An analysis from prophetic, military and intelligence sources. He graciously agreed to discuss present European events in light of past statements by European mystics and seers. Please note: Coverage of this subject is not meant as an endorsement of specific prophecies, seers or predictions.
Those are the usual arguments of people who … dread [using violence] … [and] so the fox always reasons – but not the lions; and that is the chief reason why the lion kills the fox in the end.”
Vilfredo Pareto, The Mind and Society, p. 1792
The French right-wing magazine, Valeurs Actuelles, published an open letter from twenty retired French generals last month. In essence, the generals charged the French government with being anti-French. Incredibly, this is a watershed for the West because the French generals are addressing a problem shared by other Western countries; for example, that the German government is anti-German, the Swedish government is anti-Swedish, and the U.S. Government is anti-American, etc.
As you know, the moral underpinnings of our military have been destroyed. [First] there came the removal of the policy of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ then the forced integration of transgendered people, and now they want women brought to the tip of the spear.
In 1948 Richard M. Weaver wrote that “modern man’s descent into chaos” began with “yielding to materialism.” What followed from that, he said, was a crazy train of consequences: the triumph of egotism, social anarchy, the welfare state, and demoralization. The damage has been cumulative. Now we arrive at a very dangerous moment – with slogans like “build back better” and “the Great Reset.” These are codewords for socialist revolution. In fact, these are communist codewords. An internal enemy is now inside our government (inside many governments). Communists have been masquerading as moderates, and sometimes as Christian Democrats or even Republicans. They have armed themselves with state power and the power of the mob – a mob that has already torn down statues of our Founding Fathers; a mob that has torched buildings and looted stores. In the midst of a “pandemic” unleashed from communist China, an election was stolen while agent provocateurs with false narratives piled misdirection onto disinformation. Meanwhile our external enemies – Russia and China – have initiated an unprecedented military buildup, arming themselves with missiles and submarines, nuclear EMP bombs and terrifying superweapons. All the while America’s armament has been weakened. America’s spear has been blunted if not broken by years of neglect, obstruction and sabotage.
…. everything I have said today is not a bluff – it is not a bluff, believe me – and … those who live in the past … unable to look into the future … [should] stop rocking the boat we are all in which is called the Earth.”
Vladimir Putin, 1 March 2018
Nearly two years ago The Washington Post published a piece on “Putin’s dangerous campaign to rehabilitate Stalin.” It pointed out that Stalin and Putin both murdered political opponents. Of course, Putin’s political killings have not been as numerous as Stalin’s; but why would Putin rehabilitate a communist mass murderer like Stalin? Perhaps because Stalin was Russia’s “great” leader during World War II. Perhaps Putin aspires to be such a leader himself. Essayist Simona Pipko, who met Stalin many years ago, once observed that Putin imitates Stalin’s mannerisms. And now, having studied Putin’s State of the Nation Address (which was delivered three years ago last month), it seems that Putin has Stalin’s flare for instilling fear (and perhaps his taste for killing on a grander scale; please see “How Many People Did Joseph Stalin Kill?”)
Surprise makes it possible to inflict heavy losses upon the enemy in short periods of time, to paralyze his will, and to deprive him of the possibility of offering organized resistance. Surprise is achieved in the following ways: by using various types of methods of combat; by misleading the enemy as to one’s own intentions; by safeguarding the security of operational plans; by decisive action and skillful maneuver; by unexpected use of nuclear weapons; and by using means and methods with which the enemy is unfamiliar.
Soviet Dictionary of Basic Military Terms
On 16 October of last year, during a presentation at a forum in Shenzhen, Chinese sociologist Li Yi made the following statement: “It turns out that China is going to overtake the United States….” He explained that COVID-19 was “a test” that is “bad for Europe and America” but “beneficial for China and North Korea.” Then Li spoke of China being “ahead of schedule” in terms of overtaking the United States. “The U.S. will not survive,” he predicted. “We have gained absolute superiority over the U.S. military in the Bohai Sea, the Yellow Sea, and the Taiwan Strait, and we are expanding our military at a rate unprecedented in human history.” He added that, for several years running, China has launched a new fleet every year the size of the French Navy. This rate of naval production will continue for the next decade. Then he said, “As long as 1.4 billion Chinese people eat, sleep, defecate, and urinate every day … we will drive the U.S. to its death.”
The efforts of the [Japanese] moderates to avoid a war with the United States were unsuccessful, partly because the attitude of the U.S.A. – and also that of London – [which] became more and more obdurate. When, under pressure from the army, the Konoye cabinet agreed to the military occupation of all Indo-China, the British and Americans announced in July 1941 drastic economic sanctions. Japanese funds in the U.S.A., England and various dominions were blocked.”
Wracked with economic problems, overpopulation and riots, Japan embarked on a program of military aggression in the 1930s. The first act of aggression was against Manchuria, which was invaded on 18 September 1931 without orders from the government in Tokyo. The prime minister and the Japanese parliament saw the invasion as an act of insubordination by the Imperial Japanese Army; but they could do nothing to control the generals. From that point forward the military began to dictate aspects of national policy. To make matters worse, fanatical young officers butchered liberal politicians who supposedly threatened Japan’s “honor.”
Germany … has the capability of preempting us in deploying and mounting a surprise attack. In order to prevent this from happening while destroying the German Army, I consider it necessary that in no way should we yield the initiative to the German command. We should preempt the enemy by deploying and attacking the German Army at the very moment when it has reached the stage of deploying but has not yet organized itself into a front….”
S. Timoshenko, Commissar of Defense G. Zhukov, Chief of the General Staff 15 May 1941
Hitler broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-aggression Pact on 22 June 1941 with an all-out assault on the Soviet Union. The Red Army was not able to launch the preemptive strike on the Germans called for in Timoshenko and Zhukov’s 15 May Memorandum. Because the Russian government is still holding back documents, we do not know exactly why the Red Army failed to carry out its preferred plan. We only know that the Red Army was badly defeated on the frontier, and the Soviet Air Force was massacred.
In the Event of a general conflict, only one country can win. That country is the Soviet Union.
Adolf Hitler, 19 November 1937 (conversation with Lord Halifax)
According to Viktor Suvorov, “Everything in the Soviet Union relating to the beginning of World War II is concealed by the impenetrable darkness of state secrecy.” Suvorov’s words are as true today as when they were written. What is Moscow concealing about the Soviet Union’s entry into World War II? The answer is simple. If we understood the Kremlin strategy before World War II, we might understand the Kremlin’s strategy today.
But the Second World War was only a phase – though an important one – in the realization of Lenin’s grand strategy to subjugate the capitalist … nations…. The ‘worldwide anti-imperialist struggle’ [later] was … concentrated on the U.S.A. – especially by mobilizing the Third World against that nation – once again in accordance with the thoughts of Lenin.
To understand where we are today, in terms of grand strategy, it is useful to begin with the history of the last world war. In his remarkable Origins of the Second World War, A.J.P. Taylor says the conflict originated in a dispute “between the three Western Powers over the settlement of Versailles….” He also called it “a war which had been implicit since the moment when the first [world] war ended.” What Taylor didn’t say was that the only country with a viable grand strategy at the outset of the war was the Soviet Union. Neither Germany nor the Allies had properly thought out the consequences of their policies, or the short-sightedness of their strategies. On the other hand, the leaders of the Soviet Union had worked out their basic strategy twenty years before the war began. This claim may seem incredible, but it can be proved out of quotations from Lenin’s Collected Works.
In Chinese history, in the replacement of dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always failed.
General Chi Haotian
The great strategist of ancient China, Sun Tzu, offered “sage” advice to military commanders. Central to his teaching was the art of deception. Sun Tzu said, “All warfare is based on deception.” He wrote of holding “out baits to entice the enemy,” feigning disorder and crushing him. Thus, Sun Tzu may be described as the sage of misdirection, a military trickster, and a master of cunning.
Whether it is a coincidence or not, it is nevertheless a fact that [our] decreasing moral sense has steadily kept pace with the growth in armament; for as explosives have gone up, morality has gone down. Treaties are now scraps of paper, war aims weathercocks which change with each political breeze; pledged words are sugared lies; honor between allies, veiled deceit, and obligations towards neutrals implements of betrayal.
Major General J.F.C. Fuller
Strategy is all around us. People strategize in business, sports, politics, and war. Of course, war is one of the most consequential human activities. In his book On War, Carl von Clausewitz wrote, “Strategy is nothing without battle; because battle is the agent which it uses, the means that it applies. Just as tactics is the use of armed forces in a battle, strategy is the use of battle, — i.e., the linking of the individual battles to a whole, to war’s ultimate end.” And what is war’s ultimate end? It is, says Clausewitz, “the political object of the war.”
Yeah, I know I’m ugly… I said to a bartender, ‘Make me a zombie.’ He said ‘God beat me to it.’
According to a Russian source, more than a year ago, President Vladimir Putin ordered his intelligence staff to determine whether Senator Bernie Sanders could win the White House in 2020. After examining polling data, the Russian analysts determined that Trump would beat Sanders in an electoral landslide. When this conclusion was presented to Putin, he imitated Stalin’s Georgian accent and said, “It depends on who is counting the votes.”
Among the groups who tried to distinguish the truth from the lie were the White emigres, Russians who had fled their homeland after the Soviet takeover. They were particularly vulnerable to the attack of disinformers. In Western Europe in the early 1920s they were considered to be a valuable and important anti-Communist factor. The emigres numbered about a million people of whom some 135,000 were still under arms and were thought to represent a potential anti-Communist armed force. Among the leaders of this group were men .. who exerted considerable influence over some Western statesmen.
In 1921, in order to discredit anti-communist White Russian emigres, the Soviet special services spread false information connecting White Russians with anti-Semitism. According to Natalie Grant’s book on Soviet disinformation, Moscow wanted to portray the average White Russian “as a person dangerous to society, politically immature, conservative to the point of stupidity and engaging in criminal pursuits.”
[Lenin] is stated to have been enthusiastic about a ‘beautiful plan,’ i.e., the proposal for the Communists to cross the border into another country in order to hang kulaks, priests, and landowners in that country and then pin it onto the anti-communist guerilla units operating in Soviet Russia at the time.
Sometimes it is important to revisit the past. Clarity about the past gives us clarity about the present. The Russians and their communist friends have a big bag of tricks. And in that bag you will find a Russian word: Provokatsiya [провока́ция] or, in English, Provocation. Definition: “A political event staged by an intelligence service on behalf of its government in order to accomplish some political goal.” In the quote from Natalie Grant above, we see a rather bloodthirsty example of Provikatsiya. The communist special services arrange a horrifying event which is subsequently blamed on anti-communists. There is another Russian word, as well: Dezinformatsiya (or disinformation). It refers to misleading information planted by the Russian special services. Let’s look back into history and see if any examples can be found:
Golitsyn received CIA’s permission to publish his manuscript in book form, and did so in 1984. But at the time his predictions were made, Sovietologists had little use for Golitsyn or his ‘new methodology for the study of the communist world.’ For the man who had once been ridiculed at CIA’s famous ‘Flat Earth Conference’ for claiming that the Sino-Soviet split was false, it must have seemed yet another classic case of ‘They all laughed at Christopher Columbus.’
Mark Riebling, 1994
The future may be described as an “undiscovered country” gradually revealed by time. However, an occasional Christopher Columbus comes along to trace the vague outline of unknown future continents. And yes, there have been true discoverers and discoveries; some were made by seers, some by auspices, some by scholarly prognosticators and, strangely, some were made by KGB spies.
The state is slovenly in its dealings with the citizen, permitting him, on occasion, to evade compliance with its laws; or vice versa, the state itself applies the laws fraudulently and makes them a means of deceiving the citizen.
Jose Ortega y Gasset
In Spain, the dictatorship of Gen. Miguel Primo de Rivera began in September 1923, with a military coup supported by the king. This would prove a temporary solution to an intractable problem. Primo de Rivera governed under the motto “Country, Religion, Monarchy.” To appease the left, he taxed the rich to pay for public works. When the rich complained, he tried to borrow money from banks. When currency inflation resulted, the army refused to support him. In January 1930 Primo de Rivera left Spain a broken man.
At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. Convergence would … be on terms dictated by the communist bloc. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable. Pressures would build up for changes in the American political and economic system…. Traditional conservatives would be isolated and driven toward extremism. They might become the victims of a new McCarthyism of the left.
Anatoliy Golitsyn, New Lies for Old, p. 346
America is on the road to socialism. Friedrich Hayek called it The Road to Serfdom. Presently it is a road lined with soldiers, in a capital fortified and afraid. One might ask how a socialist dictatorship begins? Always, it begins with fear. First there is fear on the side of the government. Then the government begins to make the people afraid. It is all part of a “process.”
Hitherto the question has always stood: What is God? – and German philosophy has resolved it as follows: God is man…. Man must now arrange the world in a truly human way, according to the demands of his nature.
Several decades after the devil’s own Friedrich Engels wrote that man “must now arrange the world,” Leon Trotsky argued that the Revolution must make the “collective man” into the “sole master” of all. And now, nearly a century after Trotsky made that pronouncement, we arrive at the inauguration of Joseph Biden. Look at him, before the Capitol, stepping into the shoes of George Washington. Behold this fraud, on old knees, personifying the “sole master” and “collective man,” with his dyslexic malapropisms and lapses of memory. Behind Mr. Biden, the eyeballs of Vice President Kamala Harris are excitedly glued to a banana peel under his left shoe. One thinks of Joseph Stalin and the ailing Lenin in 1922. If we listen, we may hear the mocking voice of Karl Marx citing Hegel’s comment that “all facts and personages of great importance in world history occur, as it were, twice.” Hegel forgot to add, “the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.”
At present, the public mind is not prepared to receive the truth.
Robert E. Lee, 1866
Why quote a Confederate general as we watch the country dividing into hostile camps? Because Robert E. Lee tried to calm people’s emotions after the Civil War, and there is evidence he lamented the war at its inception. From the point of view of the vanquished, he saw the limitations of violence. He saw that force can destroy and oppress, but it cannot persuade those who inwardly and steadfastly disagree.
It is precisely because Marxism is not a lifeless dogma, not a completed, ready-made, immutable doctrine, but a living guide to action, that it was bound to reflect the astonishingly abrupt change in the conditions of social life.
The hour is very late. The country has been asleep for decades. But now, it seems, the country is beginning to wake up. The real question is whether our leaders are ready for the task at hand. We have some smart people in government; but do they understand the enemy we are facing? Are they prepared to battle that enemy in the midst of so much confusion and misinformation?
If only half of Americans believe that their 2020 election was stolen by a well-funded, well-coordinated, latest-in-a-long-line-of-coup attempts by the anti-American left, here is a proposal that could surely get the attention of those remaining Americans. We must start by penetrating American minds with fact-based truth that has, up to now, been suppressed and replaced with false narratives by the elites in education, media, politics. The left’s control of the commanding heights of our culture leaves much to despise about the direction they are taking this country; their sinister, undermining labors are a boulder in the path of liberty and a millstone around the necks of free people.
Out of these pages there comes a blazing challenge to the American people. Shall their Republic … be vigorously alive or on the road to death? Shall the United States … be transformed to a Soviet America or shall it be a thriving Democratic Republic?
So far, the decision of dominant forces, somewhat blindly given, has been in favor of national suicide.
Louis Budenz, The Bolshevik Invasion of the West
Louis Budenz was born in 1891 and died in 1972. He was a labor activist who joined the Communist Party USA, became managing editor of the Party’s newspaper, Daily Worker, and then became a Soviet spy. In 1945 he renounced communism, testifying under oath about communist subversion and espionage. He wrote books in which he attempted to warn the American people about the dangers of communism. In 1965 Louis Budenz said, “The record of the past thirty years … cannot be depicted as a happy or encouraging one. Since recognition of the Bolshevik Revolution by the United States, the history of the period is dotted with American setbacks….” If Budenz were alive today, he would describe the last thirty years in similar terms.
Out of these pages there comes a blazing challenge to the American people. Shall their Republic, at the end of the next three decades, be vigorously alive or on the road to death? Shall the United States … be transformed to a Soviet America or shall it be a thriving Democratic Republic?
Louis Francis Budenz, 1965 “The Boshevik Invasion of the West”
A Soviet-born intelligence source, with connections in the former Soviet Union, tried to warn the FBI and White House last 26 February about an “imminent cyber attack by Russia on the … Voting System.” He wrote, “I had previously informed the FBI on many occasions on matters of national security. Due to the nature of my disclosures to the FBI … the FBI opened … investigations on me. Last time they secured a 12-month order to monitor my email….”
When you drive your car, do you drive in the middle of the road? This seems a silly question to ask because you don’t, of course, if you want to stay alive and get somewhere.
But a lot of people have been sold on the idea that the middle of the road is the safest place in politics on all sorts of controversial questions. They have been led to believe that in the middle position you are out of harm’s way and you are more likely to be right than those who are on either side of a question. A little thought will show that this idea is born not of wisdom but of confusion or fear or both.
Richard M. Weaver “The Middle of the Road: Where It Leads,” 1956
Machiavelli warned that neutrality is more dangerous than taking sides; for if you fail to take a side, both sides will despise you. Playing both ends against the middle is also dangerous, since you prove to be a false friend to all. And being everyone’s friend will not work if each side represents diametrically opposing principles. The right camp is never found in splitting the difference between two opposing camps. Conservative philosopher Richard M. Weaver pointed out in 1956, “middle-of-the-roadism is not a political philosophy at all. It is rather the absence of a philosophy or an attempt to evade having a philosophy.”
…I think the communists have been ahead of us in psychological realism…. They have not held back from the idea of sternness and self-subordination for the promotion of an end. In doing so, they have drawn upon a motive power that we have largely disregarded.
Richard M. Weaver
Given all that is happening, I have been reading Richard M. Weaver’s short masterpieces lately. The quote above seemed appropriate under the circumstances.
Press the listen button for my interview with Frank Gaffney: December 14, 2020.
What is the objective of the conspiracy? I think it is clear from what has occurred and is now occurring: to diminish the United States in world affairs, to weaken us militarily, to confuse our spirit with talk of surrender…. To what end? To the end that we shall … finally fall victim to Soviet intrigue from within and Russian military might from without. Is that far-fetched? There have been many examples in history of rich and powerful states which have been corrupted from within, enfeebled and deceived until they were unable to resist aggression.
When we read Senator McCarthy’s words, we wince a little. We have been conditioned to disbelieve in a Communist conspiracy. And here we are, in the grip of that same conspiracy, ashamed to say what it is, ashamed to say that our domestic and our foreign enemies are implicated in that conspiracy.
The United States is a divided country. We have two sides now. One side says there was no fraud in the election. The other side says there was massive fraud. Both sides cannot be right. Only one has the truth while the other is lying.
Whoever argues for a restoration of values is sooner or later met with the objection that one cannot return, or as the phrase is likely to be, ‘you can’t turn the clock back.’ By thus assuming that we are prisoners of the moment, the objection well reveals the philosophic position of modernism.
Richard M. Weaver
Richard M. Weaver was born on March 3, 1910 and died on April 1, 1963. He was a scholar and author whose work remains relevant today. Had he lived to the end of the Cold War, he would not have congratulated America on its supposed victory. Communism, he knew, was part of a deeper problem; that is, a philosophical and moral problem. The West was sliding into decadence. It was spiritually disintegrating. “Every man participating in a culture has three levels of conscious reflection,” noted Weaver: “his specific ideas about things, his general beliefs or convictions, and his metaphysical dream of the world.”
Editor’s Note: The following was compiled by Jani Allan from activist instructional material. The marching orders given to the left (by those who organize them) reveal advanced planning to deal with President Trump’s reaction to election fraud. This raises many questions: How did the organizers of the left know there would be so many election irregularities in advance? Why use threats of violence and unrest to resolve voting irregularities? Pay close attention to each of the items below. JRN
Think about the global interests behind your own news organizations. Think about the pressure being brought to bear from the social media companies to shut down free speech on any challenge to the election. This is a massive, well-funded, coordinated effort to deprive ‘we the people of the United States’ of our most fundamental right under the Constitution to preserve this Republic that we all cherish…. It is the 1775 of our generation and beyond.
Sidney Powell, 19 November 2020 White House Lawyers’ Press Conference on election fraud
The election fraud on November 3rd was significant. Evidence for fraud was presented yesterday at a press conference led by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell. The question is: Will we reinstate the values of the American Revolution, or will we embrace the values of the Bolshevik Revolution? Are we ready for hard truths? Or do we prefer willful blindness? Here is the heart of the matter. Civilization is an ethical proposition. And ethics are rooted in truth — not blindness.
Cliff Kincaid of http://www.USASurvival.org is back and has been writing articles, perhaps the best he has ever written. So it was an honor to be interviewed by Cliff, whose insights into the current crisis are unique. Among those insights: Cliff doubts Trump is going to leave the presidency given the massive election fraud; he notes the surprising changes in the leadership of the Pentagon. Something is bubbling under the surface. Cliff may be onto something here.