In March [2021] we saw 84% excess mortality into Fall 2021, and though we already knew our analysis was solid, here it was verified by SOA [Society of Actuaries Research Institute]. It is undeniably clear that an event occurred in the Third Quarter of 2021, the same period that vaccine mandates were ordered by the Biden Administration, and enforced by corporate America.

Edward Dowd [1]

Our food, drug, and cosmetic industries are all likely sabotage victims. The production processes of all are vulnerable to the introduction of chemical and biological agents, and the resultant contaminated products could be widely distributed.”

Brigadier General J.H. Rothschild [2]

A statistical anomaly was discovered in 2021, after the United States began mass vaccinations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. People began to die from “cause unknown.”[3] Of course, an intelligent observer might guess the cause. German-based scientists Karina Reiss and Sucharit Bhakdi, writing in 2020, said, “Experts around the world express their concerns and warn of rushed COVID-19 vaccines without sufficient safety guarantees.”[4] With regard to the proposed mRNA vaccines, Reiss and Bhakdi wrote, “No gene-based vaccine[5] has ever received approval for human use, and the present coronavirus vaccines have not undergone preclinical testing as is normally required by international regulations.”[6] What a perfect situation, from the perspective of Brig. Gen. Rothschild’s admonition, for an enemy to introduce a contaminant – a “secret sauce,” if you will – into an already inadvisable product that is being pushed into everyone’s arm. If harm is done, guess who will be blamed?

There is no underestimating the bad judgment of today’s world leaders. In the case of Europe, Reiss and Bhakdi found officialdom’s ready embrace of mRNA vaccines inexplicable. “Germany,” they noted, “a country whose populous widely rejects genetic manipulation of food and opposes animal experiments, now stands at the forefront of these genetic experiments on humans. Laws and safety regulations have been bypassed in a manner that would, under normal circumstances, never be possible.”[7] What could be a better opportunity for an attacker?

Of course, the mainstream press and the vaccine manufacturers have assured the public that mRNA technology will not modify the gene sequence of human subjects; yet, according to NCI/CCR Senior Investigator Shalini Oberdoerffer, “a novel mRNA modification may impact the human genetic code.” In fact, she says, “There are more than one hundred ways an RNA molecule can be chemically modified after it is synthesized” and the “functions of many of these modifications … are largely unknown.” [8] [Italics added.] Imagine the leeway one might have in sabotaging such a product. Oberdoerffer’s research indicates that the enzyme responsible for the mRNA modification of gene activity has “been previously implicated in cancer and aging.”[9] Here it is not really a question of changing the DNA of a cell, though unexpected changes might take place. It is a question of changing the delicate balance of cell protein production in a way that might prove fatal, over time, to an injected individual – accidentally or on purpose. What unexpected consequences might there be once we inject a person’s cells with mRNA by way of lipid nanoparticles? Since when has it been safe for man to tinker with something that only God understands? Given the complexities, I believe we have been playing with fire – in more than one dimension at once.[10]

It was grossly irresponsible to vaccinate roughly 700 million people in the NATO countries with an experimental mRNA technology that may have adverse side-effects. Hundreds of millions were, in the end, manipulated or pushed into taking this treatment. All the while, pharmaceutical companies were shielded from accountability even as they brokered deals with China (a country which should have never been allowed into our vaccine and medicine supply chain). One foolish choice was laid upon another. But who cultivates the virtue of prudence nowadays? The many politicians who backed this mad gamble, in turn, were advised by notoriously incompetent “science” bureaucrats. Given the inherently totalitarian nature of bureaucratized science, and given the readiness to make these bureaucrats into gods, we may ask: – will anyone be held responsible for vaccine deaths?

For decades bureaucrats have claimed to represent science. Some bureaucrats, like Anthony Fauci, have dared to impersonate science (as if science were a person). Such characters, imbedded in the science bureaucracies of the West, have promoted notions like man-made global warming, suggesting that we can control the Earth’s climate by choking off humanity’s gas and oil (i.e., evil carbon). They have blasted us with false predictions of rising oceans and flooded coastlines for years. And now, thinking themselves the saviors of mankind, they have injected 700 million people, in the NATO countries, with something that is truly experimental. In fact, mRNA technology has not been around long enough to guess at the potential long-term effects of injecting children. We know, already, that there have been disastrous short-term effects. While the health bureaucrats attack mRNA vaccine critics as disinformation super-spreaders, statistics based on VAERS data are beginning to tell a different story.[11]

Why did these scientific bureaucrats advise presidents and prime ministers across the Western world to use an mRNA therapy to stop the COVID-19 pandemic? Why would they embark on such a dangerous and unethical course? The answer is that such bureaucrats have always been dangerous. They combine two dangerous elements: Big Government and Big Science. If it could, the latter would make guinea pigs of us all.

It is probable that mRNA vaccines are only the beginning, only a first step. Watch and see if the “owners” of our bodies – the bureaucrats – start pushing actual gene therapies on us. The first gene therapy was licensed in China in 2003.[12] Gene therapy modifies an individual’s genes to treat a disease (as mRNA is said to modify the body’s protein production). Gene therapy is a dangerous and questionable procedure under the best of circumstances. The first human patient treated in a gene therapy trial was 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger, who suffered from a genetic disease of the liver. Gelsinger had a mild form of the disease; consequently, he was able to survive with medicine and dietary restrictions. Under the auspices of the University of Pennsylvania, on 13 September 1999, Gelsinger was injected with an adenoviral vector carrying a corrected gene. He died four days later from “a massive immune response triggered by the use of the viral vector to transport the gene into his cells….” Not surprisingly, an FDA investigation into Gelsinger’s death showed that the scientists running the trial had violated several rules of conduct: (1) Gelsinger’s ammonia levels were too high for a safe trial; (2) the university failed to report serious side effects experienced by earlier patients; (3) the scientists failed to disclose that monkeys had died when given this same treatment.[13]

The Jesse Gelsinger story does not paint a pretty picture of our scientists. Extend this scenario, once again, to 700 million people in the Western world. And yes, I know, mRNA therapy is not gene therapy, as noted earlier. Nonetheless, the mRNA vaccines belong to the same family of treatments as gene therapies. Basically, you inject a cell with a different set of instructions than the God-give ones. Again, I ask the question: What are the long-term consequences?

More than thirty years ago the first gene therapy trials were run on animals. The results were not promising. The animals suffered from toxicity, inflammation, and cancer. (Sound familiar?) Scientists have tried to find ways to avoid these dangerous effects. According to the Genetic Learning Center, “Despite the best efforts of researchers around the world … gene therapy has seen only limited success.” The reason for this? “Gene therapy poses one of the greatest technical challenges in modern medicine. It is very hard to introduce new genes into cells of the body and keep them working.”[14]

Science, however, has become a kind of religion for many people – a religion that believes man has become a kind of god. This religion says that man has the right to change his maker’s design (i.e., transhumanism) – that man has a duty, in fact, to “improve” his own genetic code. Here we run into an ethical problem, and a philosophical problem. As one authority has stated regarding “germline” gene therapy, “The idea of these germline alterations is controversial. While it could spare future generations in a family from having a particular genetic disorder, it might affect the development of a fetus in unexpected ways or have long-term side effects that are not yet known.”[15]

These technologies are inherently dangerous. Many scientists are excited by all of this, especially our social engineers and their allies, the Big Science bureaucrats. As ever, they would like to redesign the human race. This is a house built on a totalitarian foundation – with the same “man-is-God” philosophy that brought us the horrors of the Holocaust, the gulag and the Laogai. If the state is the “coldest of all cold monsters,” as Nietzsche suggested, science makes the state even colder.

In a January 2019 article for the Harvard Gazette, we read that, “Medicine is … on the cusp of major change as disruptive technologies such as gene, RNA, and cell therapies enable scientists to approach diseases in new ways.” George Q. Daley, a leader in stem cell research, has warned, “You can’t control rogue scientists in any field.”[16] And as it happens, in communist China, experimenting on human beings has already taken a terrifying turn; for it was Professor He Jiankiu who told the world in November 2018 that he had edited the genes of twin girl embryos to grant them HIV immunity; and those twins were brought to term. Here were the first genetically edited human babies. Of course, the scientific world was initially thrilled by this “achievement.” On closer examination, however, the “achievement” was called into question. The informed consent of the parents may not have been obtained. And in 2022 Chinese scientists spoke of the need to build a special care facility for the children, acknowledging that errors may have occurred in the gene editing process.[17]

Imagine you are a person born into the world as a genetic experiment. Would you say, as did Frankenstein’s monster to Frankenstein, “I ought to be thy Adam”? If this does not leave us shuddering in horror, then there is something broken in us. Many scientists were awakened from their ethical slumbers by the shocking callousness of Professor He Jiankiu and his CCP sponsors. Developmental biologist Kathy Niakan of the Francis Crick Institute commented, “If true … this would be a highly irresponsible, unethical and dangerous use of genome editing technology.”[18] 

Imagine a vast hive of tedious mediocrities with huge agencies under them, and even larger egos. In this context, what is the social pathology of a “health bureaucrat”? Is it in their fraudulent claims and ludicrous posturing, or is it in their administrative titles and self-serving rationalizations? Are they creatures of image or of substance? Are they atheists who ideologically seek God’s office? And which of them is equal to scientific discovery? What sort of moral compass guides them? And what scientist, eager to make significant discoveries, aspires to a bureaucratic station?

To state the problem bluntly, modern bureaucracies are unlikely to do ethical science, because high-level bureaucrats are motivated by power. From the atom bomb to the manipulation of the human genome, we have put Nimrod and his Tower of Babel into the shade. And it has all been done through bureaucracies. Furthermore, since bureaucrats are seldom held accountable, it is doubtful that rogue scientists working under ambitious bureaucrats have any real sense of responsibility (the kind that is spiritually felt). Once science itself has been sufficiently corrupted, the bureaucrat who is himself incapable of scientific discovery will be compelled to pseudo-scientific fakery. Here is where the whole thing crashes and burns. To stand before the public, using the word “science” as a bludgeon, is hubris. To “inoculate” 700 million people – as guinea pigs in history’s largest medical experiment – is Nemesis.[19]

The Fauci Syndrome

“Scientific totalitarianism is the background music of Anthony Fauci’s brilliant and long-lasting Ponzi scheme,” wrote Charles Ortleb. “A so-called liberal democracy like America demands a covert form of scientific totalitarianism that does not scare the horses of oversight and public opinion.” Fauci is, after all, the man who personifies bureaucratized science. After reading Ortleb’s writings on the AIDS crisis, it appears he described Tony Fauci’s bureaucracy better than anyone. Tony Fauci’s role in the HIV/AIDS fiasco is a case study in scientific falsification for the sake of bureaucratic convenience and profit. “For a scientific Ponzi scheme to prevail in America and Europe,” noted Ortleb, “nobody must recognize that they have acquiesced to a major medical and scientific fraud.”[20] Ortleb further explained:

Nobody must see the telltale signs of fraud, deceit, and censorship. Fauci knew the tricks required to turn ivy-league-educated elite journalists into servile puppets and perky stenographers. I coined the term ‘Bob Club’ to describe the sycophantic journalists who enabled the massive scientific fraud of disgraced National Cancer Institute researcher Robert Gallo. The ‘Tony Club’ is even worse and consequential in ways that will take medical historians generations to fully illuminate. [21]

Ortleb has described a corrupt bureaucracy, armed with totalitarian prerogatives, led by dishonest and self-serving individuals, tasked with managing the country’s defense in the event of a pandemic or a biological attack. Such a bureaucracy would naturally have been targeted by Russia and/or China for penetration and compromise long ago. The fact that Fauci has partnered with communist China in various enterprises, has probably been misunderstood. If Fauci went to Chinese officials to do gain-of-function research, they would have found his proposals strategically profitable (as opposed to financially profitable). Surely, they have always been ready to accommodate him with glee. “Let him make money,” the Chinese communists might say to themselves. “We will get something better in return.” And why not? Fauci’s Ponzi schemes probably fit in nicely with communist China’s biological war strategy. Why else would Communist Party officials engage with an empty suit like Tony Fauci?

“In one of [Fauci’s] many extraordinary feats of uncanny foresight,” noted Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “beginning in 2017, Dr. Fauci paid $6 million to his gain-of-function guru, Ralph Baric … to accelerate remdesivir as a coronavirus remedy at China’s biosecurity laboratory in Wuhan.” Kennedy then explained, “Baric used coronavirus cultures obtained from bat caves by Chinese virologists working with Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, another recipient of Dr. Fauci’s funding.”[22] Here we see Fauci blindly putting himself in China’s hands, paying American scientists to work in China toward an unsafe anti-viral treatment for coronavirus that, in the end, displaced effective anti-viral medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Why did Fauci oppose safe medications while advancing the use of an unsafe one? Why did Fauci blast the theory that COVID-19 was a Chinese bioweapon? Why did he deny that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese lab?[23] At every turn Fauci was covering for the Chinese. At every turn, the Chinese were also covering for Fauci.

On 22 April 2020 it was reported from China that remdesivir had “flopped in its first randomized clinical trial, disappointing scientists and investors who had high hopes….”[24] Yet, on 29 April 2020 Fauci ordered this dangerous and failed drug to be used in American hospitals. “This will be the standard of care,” said Fauci. “We think it’s opening the door to the fact that we now have the capability of treating COVID-19.”[25] According to Kennedy, Fauci made this statement with full knowledge of the “placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed remdesivir utterly ineffective …. Worst of all, the Chinese study confirmed remdesivir’s deadly toxicity.”[26]

Of course, there was money to be made with Gilead Sciences’ new medicine (remdesivir). Yet, Fauci did not fear getting caught or exposed. One might ask what kind of cartel – what kind of clique – can protect a man of his type? Certainly, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has played its part. They discovered that remdesivir was toxic and dangerous, but they did not send urgent warning messages to the American people that Fauci was poisoning them. While leveling charges against “capitalism” and “imperialism” is integral to communist propaganda, silence was the rule in this instance. The Chinese placebo-controlled study stayed under the radar. That China was a friend of Fauci is now clear. That they would avoid using his poisons on their own population is also clear. (Of course, the Chinese are perfectly happy using toxic treatments on “undesirable” categories of persons). If Fauci was okay with killing COVID patients in American hospitals that was his business. At any rate, this could be used to build an alibi for China later. If Fauci’s crew wants to make money with Gilead, then let them make money.

According to Ortleb, Fauci was unscrupulous. If that is so, it is what made him an ideal yet unwitting partner in China’s biological war strategy. Anyone willing to do a little homework can see that Fauci had been involved in obfuscating certain scientific questions during the AIDS[27] outbreak of the 1980s. In dealing with this “crisis,” Fauci spread confusion by muddying the science. He advanced toxic treatments involving drugs like AZT (azidothymidine),[28] based on the theory that HIV was the cause of AIDS. It was Charles Ortleb, among others, who suggested HIV could not have been the cause of AIDS. It should come as no surprise that it was Fauci who suppressed scientific debate on this question. He ably intimidated the media. He strong-armed writers and threatened the careers of scientists. Fauci had a totalitarian aversion to free inquiry. In fact, I know a scientist who had to leave the United States nearly three decades ago because of Fauci’s bureaucratic bullying.

Since biological war directly impacts strategic planning, the Russian and Chinese special services have long been tasked with infiltrating and compromising those agencies charged with defending America from biological attack. There is no escaping this fact. Corruption in Fauci’s NIAID, or in the NIH and CDC, must never be regarded as a simple case. Corruption in these institutions threatens our national survival. The danger is especially great when an enemy is politically and economically positioned to exploit existing corruption. Any hint of impropriety or conflict of interest within the NIAID, NIH, or CDC should not be viewed with mere indignation or outrage. It cannot be indulged and tolerated as most corruption is. It should be viewed as an immediate threat to the nation’s existence – as a matter of life and death touching every American, every family, and all allied countries. The usual offhand cynicism about our institutions should not be allowed to demoralize us, neither should this matter devolve into the usual run of conspiracy narratives which invariably talk of “an inside job.” No. An inside job would not threaten the existence of the country. We are talking about an outside job; that is, subversion by a foreign enemy; attack by a foreign enemy; extermination at the hands of a foreign enemy. Therefore, to speak of corruption at the NIAID, NIH, and CDC without speaking of China and Russia in the same breath, is to feed the enemy’s diversionary narratives.

The first thing in politics is to identify enemies and friends. The second thing is to identify traitors; for wherever you have enemies, you have traitors. Anthony Fauci presided over our biological defenses for many decades. He is retired, now, but during his long tenure the Russians and Chinese must have noticed his unique deficits. During the AIDS crisis Fauci spread confusion on every side, stifling debate. Some scientists, even now, privately believe HIV is not the cause of AIDS. About this, Charles Ortleb wrote of an alternate theory, smashed by Fauci and his bureaucratic mafia at a 1990 conference in Amsterdam:

Tragically, the HIV-negative AIDS cases were not a wakeup call for the scientists that ‘something had gone wrong’ and hence the anomalous cases were not ‘a prelude to discovery.’ Even though HIV-negative cases ‘violated deeply entrenched expectations,’ they were not allowed to change anything about the AIDS paradigm. In Kuhn’s world of normal science, ‘the traditional pursuit prepares the way for its own change.’ [The] Amsterdam [conference] showed that AIDS research was being conducted in normal science’s cockamamie opposite world, one that should be called ‘abnormal, and totalitarian, and sociopathic science.’ Even if the HIV-negative AIDS cases could have ultimately led to a new paradigm that was ‘able to account for wider range of natural phenomena,’ they were dead on arrival. [29]

Ortleb was not alone in denouncing Fauci’s totalitarian methods. Nearly thirty years ago, two scientists wrote, “Based on internal documents released to us by an anonymous source, we know that … key offices of the U.S. government specifically engineered a strategy for suppressing the HIV debate.”[30] In terms of research grants and medical patents, how much did Fauci’s Ponzi scheme harvest? Could foreign intelligence agents have missed this episode?

Imagine the potential harm wrought by a vain and unprincipled bureaucrat. Imagine how such a person could enable a scenario for a Chinese biological attack without fully knowing what he was enabling. It is only logical that the Russian and Chinese intelligence services would have thick files on Fauci and his colleagues – tasked as they were with defending the U.S. against communist bloc bioweapons. A gifted analyst, somewhere in the labyrinths of Moscow or Beijing, might have discovered that Fauci was, as Ortleb claimed, “The Bernie Madoff of science” who ran an HIV Ponzi scheme that concealed the truth about a disease that has long since lost the limelight. What damage might someone of that kind do during the outbreak of a novel coronavirus? Might he be encouraged, through corrupt practice, to falsely guarantee the safety of an mRNA injection for 700 million persons in West? What Chinese general would not piggyback on the malfeasance, stupidity and greed of such a bureaucrat?

More than twenty years ago, Chinese Defense Minister Chi Haotian reminded an elite audience of Communist Party officials that, “Our Party’s historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out.” General Chi said that once China opened its doors to “the profit-seeking western capitalists,” it was inevitable they would “invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in the world.” In this way the West would awaken what General Chi called “the sleeping lion that is China.” Chi said that China would then “become unstoppable!” China needs living space, said Chi, “Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all our issues. First, this makes it possible for us to migrate there [i.e., America] and even establish another China under the leadership of the CCP.”

How could China, with all its backwardness, solve the American problem? Chi told his party colleagues, “Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not.” Chi was talking about a lethal biological attack on the United States:

Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. [31]

The beauty of a biological attack is in the potential anonymity of the attacker. The way the world now works, with countries sharing microorganisms and biological technologies, an attacker could easily acquire specimens from a target country. An attacker could even involve the target country’s leading health officials in gain of function research – using American arrogance and greed against itself. How difficult could it be for the KGB or Chinese State Security to recruit corrupt American officials? Look at who is President of the United States!

In December 2020, Chinese sociologist, Dr. Li Yi, excitedly described the strategic situation of the COVID-19 pandemic: “It turns out that China is going to overtake the United States in 2027. It was said that this might be delayed for a year or two, but this year, God has pulled off a little trick” spreading the COVID-19 infection “to every country in the world.” Dr. Li further explained, “The COVID-19 pandemic is like a test for all the countries of the world. This test is biased though. COVID-19 is bad for Europe and America.”[32]

Let the record show that the CCP allowed the COVID-19 virus to leave Wuhan in the wake of the Chinese New Year celebration in January 2020. The greatest movement of people, in and out of China, takes place before and after the New Year’s celebration. The CCP knew there was a viral outbreak. But they did not lock down the city. They did nothing to protect their foreign “partners.” Instead, they incubated the virus in Wuhan. Then they let travelers carry the virus to North America, Europe, Australia by air. Dr. Li explained that this was to the advantage of China and North Korea. He hinted that the capitalist system cannot cope with pandemics or other emergencies. The Chinese system can cope. The Chinese system, he said, has shown its superiority. Therefore, Dr. Li concluded, “We are ahead of schedule in terms of overtaking the United States. There will be no problem reaching this goal in 2027. The U.S. will not survive … and we are expanding our military at a rate unprecedented in human history.”[33]

Dr. Li’s speech echoes the secret speech of Defense Minister Chi Haotian when he says, “As long as 1.4 billion Chinese people eat, sleep, defecate, and urinate every day; as long as we go to work every day, we will drive the U.S. to its death.”[34] But Dr. Li is not the only Chinese communist to hint at a Chinese biological attack. Consider the comments of another Chinese professor, Chen Ping, a senior Researcher at the China Institute of Fudan University (a CCP think tank). In a video presentation, Professor Chen said, “In 2020, China won the trade war, science and technology war, and especially the biological war. The achievement is unprecedented.”[35] And so it is.

Biological Warfare and the Blame Game

Why would Chinese academics or Communist Party members like Professor Chen say that China has “won” a biological war against America? How does this statement fit with General Chi Haotian’s secret speech about eliminating 100 to 200 million Americans? How does it relate to Dr. Li’s statement that “we will drive the U.S. to its death”? General Chi said that China plans to attack America with biological weapons. Dr. Li says that America will die. In relation to these statements, Professor Chen is implying that the COVID-19 pandemic is part of this strategic offensive – with China gaining mastery over trade, technology, and the politics of viral pandemics. Of course, only a small percentage of Americans have died from COVID; and only a small percentage have died from the vaccines (so far). What are we to make of this?

Perhaps Professor Chen’s remark about China’s victory in this so-called “biological war” is a function of the West’s willingness to be duped by Chinese lies. To safely prosecute a biological war, China must successfully depict each successive pandemic as naturally occurring or accidental. China must impose this interpretation on the rest of the world, at all costs. In fact, China has successfully imposed this interpretation on the mainstream media and the U.S. Government.

When the time comes to place blame on someone for the pandemic and the mRNA vaccines, you can rest assured that the Americans will be the scapegoat. And you can be sure that China and Russia will broadcast America’s guilt to the entire world. Ready at hand, are American environmentalists who have proposed a global population limit of 500 million people. The Internet is full of allegations that the American elite has initiated a “global genocide.” This narrative has already been advanced through pro-Russian and Chinese disinformation channels. And the narrative is gaining traction. In addition, Russian and Chinese sources allege U.S. “biological military activities” in Ukraine.[36]

Assuming General Chi’s plan is still on the table, China must justify its genocidal moves by propagating narratives accusing the United States of genocidal moves. The best justification for exterminating the American people is to implicate America in a heinous plot against mankind. A genocidal campaign against America must be portrayed, politically, as an act of self-defense on the part of America’s enemies. Arguments are already being deployed, in Russia and China, to justify an extermination policy against the United States. Moscow and Beijing would not have designed these narratives unless they were intending to carry out genocidal attacks of their own. Long ago Stalin told a room of young law students in Leningrad: “If anyone accuses us of crimes, we accuse them.”[37]

Of course, before China can successfully blame its intended victim, the CCP must hide its role in spreading the novel coronavirus. China must also hide its role in the development of the mRNA vaccines, which are inherently suspicious insofar as the left-dominated bureaucracies of the West – against all common sense – have pushed these vaccines on children and pregnant woman.[38] It is the Marxists, the communists, the fellow-travelers and useful idiots who have been at the forefront of pushing the vaccine mandates.

While America is being set up for blame, China’s guilty actions remain hidden behind a wall of silence. In December 2021 President Joseph Biden smirked and walked away when The New York Post asked why he hadn’t “done more to push China to be transparent on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.”[39] When former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison – a conservative – called for an investigation into the coronavirus’s origins, China warned Australia that Sino-Australian relations could be damaged “beyond repair.”[40] In the Chinese press, Australia was characterized as “chewing gun stuck on the sole our shoes.”[41] The Australian prime minister did not persist in his position, finding little support from America on this issue. Later, Morrison’s government was replaced by a more China-friendly government, as in America and Brazil.

The fact that an investigation into the origins of the pandemic is opposed by Beijing, that Western leaders are threatened when calling for an investigation, is suggestive of Chinese guilt. If China were innocent, China would welcome an investigation. From the moment China resisted an international inquiry into the pandemic’s origins, the West should have turned its back on China. Trade with China should have been curtailed. But this did not happen.

A Global Vaccine Mandate

The World Health Organization, for many years, has issued a medical passport called a “yellow card.” It  certifies that a person traveling between certain countries has been vaccinated against diseases like yellow fever, cholera, and rubella. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic the United Nations and the World Health Organization have proposed to build an official registry of persons vaccinated for COVID-19. What this list might become, and how it could be used to control people, and force injections into people, is worth considering.

The World Health Organization (WHO), which has been referred to as “China’s puppet,”[42] is presently setting up a global health dictatorship. It is working towards a global vaccine mandate. If the science bureaucrats of the United States link arms with the science bureaucrats of China, using the World Health Organization as a cudgel, we may be looking at the forcible vaccination of every American. As transparency has been wanting with respect to the mRNA vaccines, we will see an even greater lack of transparency attending a global vaccine mandate. With its central role in making medicines and vaccine precursors, China will be a principal player in forcing select vaccines on America and the West. As we saw with the mRNA vaccination process, a future global vaccine mandate will involve intrigue, secrecy, bullying, and lies. In other words, a global vaccine mandate will follow communist practice. [43]

How dangerous are vaccines of the new type, deployed without transparency by unaccountable bureaucrats?

According to Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd, the mRNA vaccines are killing people in the United States. According to Dowd’s analysis, “From February 2021 to March 2022, millennials experienced the equivalent of a Vietnam war with more than 60,000 excess deaths. The Vietnam war took 12 years to kill the same number of healthy young people we’ve just seen die in 12 months.”[44] Last year Dowd “convened a group of insurance industry executives to explore” this data further. Expert analysts were recruited from around the world. They discovered that COVID-19 vaccines have been injuring and killing people since their deployment. Worse yet, America’s media is sticking to the narrative of our science bureaucrats that vaccines are safe, that the risks are negligible.

At this juncture it is worth citing two vaccine deaths documented in Dowd’s book. The first involves Australian cricket legend Shane Warne, vaccinated in March 2021. Warne said, “Get your double vax and get on with it and learn to live with it.” Shortly thereafter he died of a suspected heart attack, age 52. Another case was that of Jake R. Kazmarek, 28-years-old, who decided to be vaccinated after initially hesitating. He said, “You can hold out as long as you want but you won’t have much freedom. I’m over it, I did it. Does it make me a sheep? No.” He died four days after being administered the second shot.[45]

In Steve Kirsch’s newsletter we read of a man who owns funeral homes across America, handling over 3,000 deaths a year. On condition of anonymity, this man said his business went up by 50 percent after the vaccines came out. Sadly, he acknowledged, a disproportionate number of the deaths are young people. Kirsch interjected that there has been a twelve-fold increase in still births – deaths that often do not go through funeral homes. The owner of the funeral homes said his company had never buried a teenager who died of a heart attack in 78 years of operating. In December 2022 they buried one teenager a week for three straight weeks – all dead from heart attacks. Nurses who never saw a teenage heart attack are seeing them regularly. Kirsch’s sources also told him of “strange rubbery clots” funeral directors are finding in corpses. One funeral home even called in a medical examiner who confirmed the that the clots were real. The medical examiner would say nothing publicly because he was afraid of losing his job.[46]

The vaccines are not only killing people, however. They are injuring people. Dowd shows that America now has its highest-ever disability rates. Prior to the vaccine mandates 29-30 million Americans of working age were disabled. After mass vaccination the number jumped to almost 33 million. “For math geeks,” noted Dowd, “that’s a stunning 3 standard deviation event.” In other words, this increase in disabilities is probably not due to chance. And how bad are these disabilities? Dr. Jessica Rose, who has studied U.S. Government VAERS data, says, “Although death is the most extreme adverse event, there are some things that might actually be worse than death.”[47]

Our science bureaucrats, of course, are not going to admit to a grisly blunder. According to the CDC director, vaccinating a million children will cause only 30 or 40 cases of myocarditis. As Dowd’s book shows, this is a boldfaced lie. According to Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University, “We’re now learning that there’s significant heart damage [from the shots], 31% of people having physical activity restrictions. 63% of children after myocarditis had evidence of heart swelling months down the road on MRI. So we are playing with fire.”[48]

In his book, Edward Dowd shows that the vaccines are striking down healthy people. As we know, the coronavirus principally threatened the infirm and the elderly. Simply put, the vaccines pose a greater threat to society than the pandemic. Then there is the damage vaccines are doing to reproductive organs in men and women. Toward the end of his book, Dowd writes:

Public health officials and vaccine makers are aware of everything that you now know from this book – at a minimum. At this point, they have moved beyond something we could write off as incompetence, in that they are allowing (and even forcing) mass use of products they know are harmful. At this point, powerful people in public health and Pharma are in full cover-up mode. They almost have to be, because it’s hard to imagine how they could pivot from what they’ve done to what they ought to do.”[49]

The negligence and malfeasance of American officials has been criminal. And these officials must be held to account, with no leniency or exceptions. What is even more important in this situation, however, is China’s role in the background. We cannot be putting things into our bodies that are made in China, or pushed by people who are beholden to China (at the CDC or the WHO). And we must not be forced to take such products intravenously. Anyone who tries to forcibly vaccinate Americans with a vaccine made in China, or using Chinese vaccine precursors, should be considered a public enemy and placed under arrest. In this context, it is one thing to have criminally negligent health officials, it is another thing to have criminally negligent health officials collaborating with the communist Chinese – in such things as “vaccine passports” and future vaccine mandates. (Also see, China’s dominance of the World Health Organization).[50] 

When the Most Dangerous Disease is Diagnosis

Coming to the wrong conclusions from the right facts is a disease. Take, for example, Sasha Latypova’s Substack – titled “Due Diligence and Art.” She says that DARPA and the Pentagon intend to genocide the American people. She has written an article titled, “The role of the U.S. DoD (and their co-investors) in ‘covid countermeasures’ enterprise.”[51] There are fascinating tidbits in what she writes. But there are serious problems with her analysis. Pursuing her investigation, Sasha asked the AI Chat Bot what the role of the DoD has been in covid-countermeasures. The Chat Bot linked her to a thread from DARPA’s website on the organization’s role in combating pandemics.[52]

DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. On the DARPA website, under the heading of Treat & Prevent, we read that “DARPA technology contributes to preventing future COVID-19 infections through novel vaccine technology and more pervasive environmental aerosol monitoring … and domestic active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacture.”

Is this a smoking gun? No. Does this prove that DARPA and the DoD are engaged in a genocidal campaign against America? No. If DARPA was not researching solutions, working on vaccine technologies, what else would they be doing? Seriously. Research is what government scientists, in their laboratories, are hired to do. In fact, such people are specialists. Nietzsche called them “microscopists” – people who know more and more about less and less. As such, they are not counterintelligence experts, qualified to know when their research is being hijacked by agents of a foreign power. In such matters a science bureaucracy is more like a litter of blind kittens. But there is more to it than this. A significant percentage of U.S. government scientists happen to be Chinese nationals, some of whom are probably Chinese agents. According to the Center for Security Policy’s Team B Report on the pandemic, a major “threat vector for bio sabotage is the presence of Chinese nationals – including People’s Liberation Army personnel – in America’s university and national laboratories, research centers, National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), etc.”[53]

If DARPA and the Pentagon are master conspirators, working toward the demise of mankind, there remains a burning question: What self-respecting master-conspirator would casually allow the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to infiltrate his agency?

A blind kitten bureaucracy could hardly be expected to know there is anything wrong with mRNA vaccines. Each microscopist trusts his manager, who trusts the manager above him, and so on. As Jonathan Swift famously wrote:

So, naturalists observe, a flea
Has smaller fleas that on him prey;
And these have smaller still to bite ‘em
And so proceed ad infinitum.[54]

Each “flea,” as it were, is focused on his specialization. Is this nefarious? No. It is bureaucratic “science.” But Sasha says DARPA and the DoD are plotting to kill us. One might ask, are all the junior professors teaching political correctness on college campuses preparing to overthrow the government? No. It doesn’t work like that. Each bureaucratic flea does what he is trained to do for the Great Circus of Fleas, not knowing the real significance of his contribution. Usually, the person at the top is just an empty suit – a fraud, like “the man behind the curtain” in the Wizard of Oz. If he is corrupt, he thinks it’s about money. Even here he is too limited to grasp the strategic significance of his actions.[55] If any of these people have guilt, it is the guilt of not knowing; that is, of the intellectual laziness that attends smallness.

Sasha, of course, paints a very different picture of our Great Circus of Fleas. She writes, “the U.S. Government and DOD specifically ordered a fake theatrical performance from the pharmaceutical manufacturers. Just to make extra certain that the pharmas [sic] are free to conduct the fakery, the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.”

She makes the DoD into a puppet-master and the pharmaceutical companies into puppets. She misunderstands the fundamentals. Long ago it was understood: vaccines do save people, but they also kill people. Therefore, under President Reagan, the vaccine companies threatened to stop making vaccines if they were not legislatively secured against legal liability. Therefore, Congress passed the legislation and President Reagan signed it. Was Reagan involved in a nefarious conspiracy? No. It was a cost-benefit calculation by people who believe vaccines save more lives than are killed by the side-effects. To omit this fact is to forget that political leaders are faced with difficult choices all the time. And these leaders are only human.

Belief in the safety and utility of vaccines is longstanding. Opposition to all vaccines in principle is a minority position. If you are bitten by a rabid dog, what do you do? You had better get a rabies shot. If you don’t want to get tetanus, you get a tetanus shot. Nearly everyone in America has been vaccinated for something. Of course, a small percentage of people die from vaccines. Yet most scientists believe vaccines save more people than they harm. In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, most bureaucrats believed that more people would be saved by the mRNA vaccines than harmed. We should remember that most Americans naively believe in the “scientific” explanations of “scientists.” One might add that our blind kitten science bureaucracy is also naïve, believing uncritically in itself. Many who pushed the vaccines in and out of government are not conspirators. In all countries and ages people have believed in things that are untrue. This does not make them evil. This makes them human. The real guilt comes when Big Pharma and the science bureaucracy, having committed a grisly series of blunders, lie to cover up their mistakes. This, again, is a very human thing to do. Who, indeed, readily admits to homicidal negligence? It is damnably wrong, of course; but it is not a conspiracy to exterminate America.

In respect of this, Item 1.1.1 in Sasha’s document trove is one of those blacked-out papers where 99 percent of the content has been redacted. It starts out, “Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development and distribution (excluding China) of a potential mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine aimed at preventing COVID-19 infection….” Sasha says, “I know what is in the redacted part of the above paragraph and it was not hard to figure out.” She does not tell us how she knows, however, that the redacted paragraph refers to “Fosun Pharmaceuticals” – a Chinese pharmaceutical company that joined up with Pfizer and BioNTech in the early days of the pandemic. Sasha gives kudos to Naomi Wolf as the “only journalist” who has mentioned Fosun International Ltd as a mRNA vaccine manufacturer. Given the suspicious nature of pandemic, coming out of China as it did, we should all be interested in Fosun’s involvement with vaccine production. Fosun International Ltd is a conglomerate run by a Chinese Communist Party official named Guo Guangchang. In March of 2020, as the pandemic was going worldwide, Fosun Pharma invested $55 million in BioNTech, becoming an important shareholder. Around that time Pfizer also increased its ownership of BioNTech. And why not? Vaccines were being discussed as a possible solution to the pandemic, and there was a lot of money to be made.  

So far, all we have in Sasha’s presentation is a bunch of documents about contracts and investments. If there is a malady in this paperwork, what is Sasha’s diagnosis? She writes, “many people ask me ‘what about China and Russia?’ when I talk about our own government and DoD engaged in mass genocide of Americans. I answered about China – they are allied with the US DoD on this.”

But nearly two million people work for the federal government. Are they all involved? Sasha does not say. And why would our government leaders and Pentagon generals connive at the extermination of their own country – the killing of their colleagues, friends, and relatives? What is their motive for mass murder? What benefits do they hope to gain? Sasha does not say.

Genocide is defined as “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” Of course, Sasha does not present evidence that the U.S. Government, let alone the Pentagon, wants to exterminate the American people. She presents evidence that the government has been working on vaccines, that Pfizer made deals with Fosun International Ltd. Without considering the history of American naivete regarding China and Russia, sasha jumps to a conclusion she has no real evidence for.

We have to ask ourselves how likely is it that (a) the U.S. Government intentionally made the vaccines to kill off the America people? And (b) how likely is it that the U.S. Government is peopled by suicidal maniacs who want to put an end to their own lucrative retirements? In fact, this is what Sasha is alleging. On its face, how probable does any of it sound? Sasha does not produce a “Secret Speech” by General Milley, along the lines of General Chi Haotian’s secret speech. So why does she emphasize the guilt of American officials above that of Chinese officials?

In fact, Sasha’s ideas about the role of Russia and China give the whole game away. Quite explicitly, Sasha says that China is “allied with the U.S. DoD engaged in mass genocide….” She adds, however, that China is only participating for profit, for the money, for what she calls “the financial windfall of the U.S. government printing dollars and throwing them in the mRNA furnaces where they are driving masses of the brainwashed citizens to suicide themselves.” That is to say, the master conspirators are in the U.S. Government, not in the Chinese government. The Chinese have simply been bribed and are performing the role of “accessories” to mass murder. The primary murderers are Americans.

Sasha then moves quickly to exonerate Russia: “I have not seen evidence of any similar alliance with Russia. This makes sense, because ultimately this boils down to the war of the U.S. vs. Russia using proxies and alliances (as it always does). This does not mean that Russia are ‘the good guys.’” Then Sasha suggests that the “owners” of Russia are “not necessarily based in Russia.”

The owners of Russia are not based in Russia?

This whole formulation reeks of conspiracy theory. Nobody who has studied Russia seriously, or studies history, is going to make a statement like this. One may search all the history books, all the encyclopedias, and all the newspapers without finding a shred of evidence that Russia is owned by someone “not based in Russia.” This preposterous idea smacks of Lenin’s theory of imperialism; though Lenin was never so crude as to say, “the owners of Russia are not based in Russia.” Furthermore, Lenin would not say such a thing about today’s Russia, which supports every communist regime on the planet (including North Korea and Cuba).

One might sarcastically respond to Sasha’s analysis by asking whether the foreign owners of Russia, like the family car, have a pink slip? Do the “owners” of Russia pay annual registration fees to the UN’s National Ownership of Countries Department? If Sasha is not wearing a tinfoil hat, then what kind of hat is she wearing?  

But then Sasha’s analysis gets ever weirder, where she writes, “Russia is running the same ‘covid scripts,’ using knock off RNA/DNA injections, probably buying materials from the same suppliers, and also using [the] war to kill off their own younger population. It’s just that they are doing it for THEIR OWN interests, not that of the U.S. and their allies.”

But I thought she said Russia was owned by people “outside of Russia.” Now she says Russia is following its own interest by killing its own people. She ought to explain how it is in the interest of a government to kill off its people. For if all the people are killed off, who is left to govern? If you are going to write serious political analysis, you must be consistent in your premises. You cannot play bait and switch, trundling back and forth between incompatible notions. Specifically, what interest does Russia have in killing off its own younger population if they are already doing it with the same “covid scripts” as the Americans? COVID vaccines are a much easier kill mechanism, and less destructive of property, than a war. Sasha’s analysis makes no sense.

And here is where Sasha really loses me. If the Kremlin wants to kill off the Russian people, even as the U.S. government wants to kill off the American people, why say the Kremlin is doing it for Russian interests as opposed to U.S. interests? She never tells us what the U.S. Government interest is in killing off the American people? I mean, the idea is absurd on its face. There can be no government interest in killing off the people it is tasked with protecting. Are they doing it because these politicians and bureaucrats don’t want their retirement pensions? Of course, she does not explain.

One non sequitur follows another. Sasha says that the “Covid-19 vaccines are biowarfare agents, legally not medicines….” Where, may I ask, are the documents expressly demonstrating this? Here we find words of blame inserted, willy-nilly, throughout Sasha’s text. She writes as if the documents she cites can speak for themselves, saying in effect: “Hey, I’m a Pfizer contract and I’m proof that the U.S. Government wants to exterminate the American people.” And we, the audience, are supposed to look on, horrified and say, “Oh no. It is a smoking gun!”

But we see neither a gun nor smoke. In reality we see a mix of blind kittens, penetration agents, and greedy opportunists. Such people might enable a genocidal attack, unwittingly. But clearly, an attack of this kind can only originate from outside the country; for the motive of such an attack can only be found in the Chinese Communist Party, and in the secret speech of Chi Haotian which refers to “cleaning up America” so that a second China can be built in the lower 48 states.

Sasha presents her conspiracy theory, when all is said and done, in the following way: “The current war is the war of the global governments (plural), that only pretend to be at odds with each other, marketing themselves as ‘left,’ ‘right,’ … etc. in a never ending clown show of the political theater. Behind the scenes, the ‘official enemies’ are partners and co-investors into ‘joint ventures’ against us, [the] people of the world.”

Political Science 101, according to James Burnham, holds that, “Politics is about three things. It is about power, power, and power.” How does a government increase its power by exterminating its own people? Economics 101 teaches us that business is about profit. How do corporate executives maintain profits when they have killed off all their customers? Sasha’s analysis violates the fundamental axioms of politics and business. Such brilliant conspirators they all are! – drooling morons who want to kill and impoverish themselves!  

Sasha may mean well, but she has no analytical ability, no historical understanding, no strategic insight. I cannot understand why people forwarded her commentary to me, as if I was missing something. Her commentary is, in its own right, a false narrative – inverting blame for the pandemic and the vaccines (insofar as these represent a biological attack). Hers is a screed that disconnects motive from action, cause from effect, and real fact from childish imaginings.


Links and Notes

[1] Edward Dowd, Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of sudden Deaths (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2022), p. 80.

[2] J.H. Rothschild, Tomorrow’s Weapons: Chemical and Biological (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964), p. 133.

[3] Dowd, P. 33: “Ignoring these deaths is the greatest disrespect we could ever show. These young people and their families and communities deserve to have someone care about why they died – “

[4] Reiss and Bhakdi, Corona, False Alarm? (Kindle Edition), p. 109.

[5] Prior to 2020 articles can be found which describe mRNA-therapy as “Gene Therapy.” (See, for example, “Therapeutic Prospects of mRNA-Based Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma” from Frontiers in Oncology, After the advent of the mRNA vaccines, this characterization (as “gene therapy”) is vigorously denied by the mainstream press, which ran articles denying that mRNA was gene therapy in any sense. The distinction arises as mRNA only affects protein cell production rather than the genetic makeup of the cell. Allegedly, there is no mutagenesis with mRNA therapies; thus, the gene itself is not altered, only the cell’s protein production. But there remains a curious subtlety: the genetic function of the cell is changed although the mRNA does not penetrate the cell nucleus, being released inside the cytosol of cell.

[6] From this quote a profound question arises. How could a microbiologist of Bhakdi’s stature, mistakenly characterize the mRNA vaccines as a “gene-based vaccine” when the mainstream press and the vaccine producers all declare mRNA is no such thing?

[7] Ibid, p. 111.

[8] Shalini Oberdoerffer, Ph.D., “A novel mRNA modification may impact the human genetic code.” NIH Intramural Research Program, 2018.

[9] Ibid.

[10] While it is certainly true that mRNA technology does not aim at the nucleus of the cell, where most of the DNA resides and the gene sequence may be modified, mRNA technology nonetheless aims at the cytosol, an aqueous component of the cytoplasm of a cell, in which various organelles and particles are suspended, including hundreds to thousands of mitochondria which have their own DNA. To say that an RNA molecule injected into the cell cannot interact with or have an impact on mitochrindrial DNA is to say more than we know.

[11] Dowd, pp. 53-59.



[14] “Challenges in Gene Therapy,” at Learn Genetics.,body%20and%20keep%20them%20working.




[18] Ibid.

[19] Nemesis, signifies divine retribution, implacable justice. As a Greek Goddess, Nemesis is an avenger of crime, from whom there is no escape. Nemesis enacted divine retribution on Narcissus for his vanity, and upon Aura for her prideful virginity.

[20] Charles Ortleb, Fauci: The Bernie Madoff of Science and the HIV Ponzi Scheme that Concealed the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic (USA: Rubicon Media, 2019), p. 39.

[21] Ibid, p.

[22] Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci (Kindle Edition), p. 164.




[26] Kennedy, p. 167.

[27] Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

[28] Martin Delaney, founder and head of the AIDS activist group Project Inform, wrote about AZT as follows: “The multi-career clinical trials of AZT are perhaps the sloppiest and most poorly controlled trials ever to serve as the basis for an FDA drug licensing approval…. Because mortality was not an intended endpoint, causes of death were never verified. Despite this, and a frightening record of toxicity, the FDA approved AZT in record time, granting a treatment IND in less than five days and full pharmaceutical licensing in less than 6 months.” From Lauritsen, Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story (New York: Asklepios, 1990), p. 27.

[29] Ortleb, pp. 30-31.

[30] Bryan J. Ellison and Peter H. Duesberg, Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS (USA: Inside Story Communications, 1994), pp. 243-44.

[31] Ibid.


[33] Ibid.

[34] Ibid.



[37] This was told to me by a Soviet defector, Simona Pipko, who was a young law student in attendance when Stalin spoke those words.

[38] — Here China makes it appear that its involvement with Pfizer in making the mRNA vaccine only began in 2021 when, according to Pfizer’s own paperwork, the involvement goes back to 2020 (according to Naomi Wolf).






[44] Dowd, p. 1.

[45] Ibid, pp. 15 and 23.


[47] Ibid, pp. 109-117.

[48] Dowd, p. 115.

[49] Ibid, p. 119.

[50] — Editor’s comment: In terms of prosecuting a global biological war, commanding the high ground of the World Health Organization and various United Nations entities would be critical.



[53] Faddis, Freeman, Gaffney, Hatfill, Kennedy, Mills, Nyquist, The CCP is at War With America: A Team B Report on the COVID 19 Biological Warfare Attack (Washington, D.C.: Center for Security Policy, 2022), p. 41.

[54] Jonathan Swift, Poetry, A Rhapsody. Note 1.
               “Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite ‘em

               “And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.
               “And the great fleas themselves, in turn, have greater fleas to go on;
               “While these again have greater still, and greater still, and so on.”
               De Morgan: A Budget of Paradoxes, p. 377.

[55] Anthony Fauci probably falls into this category; for he has not moved to China, or Russia.

Support the Site

Quarterly Subscription (to support the site)


Visit Jeff’s book page at

188 thoughts on “The Politics of Biological Warfare and the Inversion of Blame, Part II

  1. The obvious clue from the outset is that the FDA protocol of testing for safety and effectiveness, was established for good reason. Any licensed medical professional who administered the shots knew with malice of forethought the gross criminal negligence and probable genocide which they were comfiting. The allelopathic system of medicine has become a casualty of war.

      1. Legally, malice. Just following orders was a hanging offense at Nuremburg.

        I can appreciate your tippy toeing around making accusations. To prosecute all the security guards who infringed on Free Speech by ordering people to wear masks, along with all the nurses who gave shots, and teachers who pitch students on turning tranny, there wouldn’t be enough rope to hang them all, nor enough land to burry them in, and the air pollution from cremating all the dead bodies would be worse the the recent train derailment chemical releases.

        Besides, all the useful idiots already committed suicide by time release lethal injection. The dead will simply rot in their foreclosed upon homes.

  2. PS:
    The World Health Organization, a subsidiary of the United Nations run by a team of bureaucrats in Geneva, soon could have the power to dictate lockdowns, vaccination mandates, social distancing and much more in the United States.

    Even surveillance of citizens.

    The surveillance and monitoring components of the plan would make sure there are few, in any, who disagree with the bureaucrats successfully.

    1. Are we really to believe that politicians were hapless dupes that weren’t threatened and bribed, if not ideologically motivated? Why didn’t the government employed physicians warn the politicians then?

  3. I haven’t had a chance to read this blog entry yet, but after I got back into the country I was able to listen to the panel discussion on the last one. It was awesome, and I just wanted to thank you for it. 🙂

  4. So, you read one or two Substack entries of Sasha Latapova and you spend half this writing (Part II) discrediting her based on those two pieces that were forwarded to you? In the past 2 weeks, you have taken time and “analyzed” her incompetencies and shortcomings based on your own knowledge of this subject of an experimental biological agent being developed (and implemented) courtesy grants doled out for decades, by our own DoD, to numerous pharmaceutical companies here?

    And then you’ve managed to insult your readers here as if some are saying that the entire spectrum of federal government employees are out there trying to commit genocide toward their fellow Americans?

    You’ve missed the point, Jeff. You won’t ever admit that the US government has people, at the top, that do actually hate this country and what it stands for, and their own ideology drives them to further that personal political ideology and use their power and control over subordinates to achieve their agenda (which just happens to be the same as the Marxist leaders of China and Russia).

    I don’t think you have researched, read, or really understand the magnitude of the coronavirus
    and or gain of function research that has been going on since the late 90’s, and you certainly don’t understand the players involved in these experimental biological agents that were forced upon us here in the US as well as the rest of the world.

    But, at least you will admit publicly on radio today that the experimental “vaccines” or actually mRNA gene therapies, have been used as a bioweapon against this country.

    I think I made a mistake in thinking you understood this issue and I won’t bother commenting further.

    1. What I read was very poor political analysis. I do not care about the biology. It is the political intrigue that matters and she has gotten it all turned around. If you think her writing is good, and she has the answers, please explain why. I think this subject is not her thing.

    2. PS — I do not understand your criticism on what I wrote. My whole career is based on knowledge of Americans who hate this country. I know them quite well. I went to school with such people. But the people I went to school with are not orchestrating this. Destroying a country requires an organization, and another country. That’s China. That’s communism. I am trying to get you to see that. Ultimately it’s Communist China. Not the DoD. Shasha has it backwards.

      1. It was obvious, to those not completely blinded by fear, that a rushed mass vaccine roll-out presents an ideal potential false-flag bio-attack vector. You may believe the DoD (for all “duped” nations that participated) only made terrible blunders in this unprecedented deployment, but I don’t, and I don’t think very many rational observers would either.

      2. To be fair, this sort of garbage is actually a common Communist practice dating all the way back to Lenin, so the Chinese doing something like this isn’t exactly something that’s unexpected. That’s not to say the DOD couldn’t have had a hand in this garbage, they probably did, but you also have to take into account whether they actually were taking marching orders from America or from China. We’ve had plenty of traitors at the top. In fact, Bill Clinton was essentially a Manchurian Candidate for China thanks to his campaign cash deal with them.

      3. So documented DoD (and DoJ) involvement is to be overlooked, because the blame is ultimately on Communist China? Isn’t that diversion of blame?

      4. Overlooking DoD involvement in what? In developing weapons? That is what they are supposed to do. If the weapon is used against us, it is no different than the case of the atomic bomb. You have spies and enemies inside your system. This has always been the case. The Pentagon did not make the atom bomb to kill Americans. They made it because they were afraid Hitler was making one. Drawing unwarranted inferences from facts is not proof of your thesis. One ought to make reasonable inferences instead of leaping into unprovable conspiracy theories in which the theory offers a circular form of argument in which every fact proves the case, whatever that fact happens to be.

      5. Gintonic: we have documented evidence that our political leadership, including Biden, much of Congress, including many in DoD and DoJ, have either been bought by China and Russia, or are beholden to Russian and Chinese fellow travelers such as the WEF, therefore they follow the dictates of their masters. So how is it diversion of blame to mention those at the top? To mention those who are ultimately responsible?

      6. This is the point. Those who are bought or manipulated are not masters and are not the originators of the attack on us. They are merely tools. They can be mopped up easily. It is the attack of the communist movement, of Russia and China that we must survive.

    3. So in other words, your entire message is, don’t blame Russia and China, blame America?

      Thank you, Comrade.

    4. I would agree with the assessment that Sasha’s arguments are weak, but… I would submit an alternative motive for western shadow government connivance in the Chinese attack on the western populations (and this also applies to why they tolerate or even encourage Russian and Chinese subversion in the West in general). And that would be they themselves constitute a rival, but hidden, communist faction and see in wholesale chaos, loss of life, destruction of society and collapse of institutions, etc., the very same gains the Bolsheviks saw in the Holodomor: a more malleable society.

      So whereas the Chinese and Russians see their nefarious intrigues as softening the West up for a coming joint-clenched fist strike, it is my view that our own elite caste see these things as the master subversives doing their dirty work for them.

      And I also think another issue is now being resolved, concerning the actual goals of Russia’s and China’s communist cliques.

      On the one hand, communists like to portray themselves as “internationalists” committed to spreading their ideology worldwide, and presumably this is how the CCP sells its subversive work in the West to its willing western partners, such as the CP USA and all those little fronts and groups that do their bidding.

      Yet on the other hand, China wants the US homeland for its own, at the zero sum game expense of the host population, especially the Anglos.

      So which is it? Are the Russians and Chinese purist ideologues hellbent on making the West an aligned bloc under their domination within a one world communist “utopia”? Or are they out to annihilate us and seize our homelands for material gain, revealing that all communism ever was is a means to a very materialistic end for the elites who deploy it?

      Plainly, it is the latter; after all, “the love of money is the root of all evil” (1 Tim 6:10).

      And that brings me back to our own elites, the arch materialists of the West, whom I now believe view the whole of the CCP’s shenanigans in the US and its allies in a transactional fashion: the Chinese get our intellectual property and money to build themselves into a global powerhouse, and the West gets revolutionary conditions engineered within its bounds by the experts that are the Russians and Chinese who think they are going to beat us.

      And all that technological and economic empowerment handed to China?

      That yields an additional enemy whose menace can be leveraged and exploited.

      For example, want a new public health crisis to justify a mandatory vaccine-and-ID payload?

      “It was the Chinese”.

      Want a cyberattack to justify introducing a Central Bank Digital Currency?

      “It was the Russians”.

      The upshot is that it all leads to Revelation 16:2 and the coming “noisome sore” on all who will take the Mark and bow down to the beast’s image (i.e. comply with the scarlet ideology’s social credit dicta here in the West).

      In this regard, it all seems like pure Hegelian synthesis: create conflicting conditions seemingly detached from the desired outcome they produce.

  5. Brcc66 more astutely summarizes my thoughts. You are losing the thread of just how much subversion may be involved and imo being overly attached to Ukrainian interests as ‘good guys’.
    The thread is. If the shot administered here and not China and Russia (mrna) is deadly. The entire question of this that and the other thing is effectively moot.
    No wild turkey chases necessaryto piece together general so and so and his speech to Chinese communists.

    1. So you agree with Sasha that the Chinese are just in this for the money and the American administrators of our health system want to kill us? This is hard for me to accept.

    2. “Guys, whatever you do, don’t focus on China and Russia! Focus on America, the CIA, the “deep state”!

      1. You definitely caught their tune. The communists have infiltrated America, changed some things. Then they blame America for it. We need to be destroyed, right?

  6. How will the targeted part of the world ever come out of this general confusion, particularly as way too many people in political and health-bureaucratic positions, who have careers to lose, must have begun realising what they have done. Sadly, it seems, cover-up and more of the same will be their only “solution”, even if only to save their own rotten skins. – While the communists in Moscow, Beijing and around the world are laughing their heads off…

    Maybe some Brazilian readers can either confirm or refute this, but allegedly Comrade “Lula” is preparing a “law” that would mandate the WHOLE population of Brazil to receive these dangerous Covid jabs, threatening them with long prison sentences in case of noncompliance:

  7. Jeff :

    I think your article is spot on. A simple internet search shows Sasha Latypova to be a contributor to That site is very hard left. I remember I used to read some articles by F. William Engdahl. From that same site. After getting some perspective, I realized he was doling out pure propaganda.
    Sasha is not credible. The only question is whether she is a misguided dope, or a sinister bad actor. Keep up the good work.

    1. Wade :

      Just to throw my opinion in here. It goes to show that adult stem cells may be very promising. Why do some push the use of fetal stem cells so much, with moral issues and little success.
      Just sayin…

  8. Your knowledge of history overall, and of China’s motivations in particular are beyond impressive. However, you seem to be convinced that our enemies (whoever they may be) are logical and rational. I’ve seen nothing in my own research that allows me to reach that conclusion. Nonetheless, you’ve added more information and insight into my own feeble attempts to comprehend what is, to many of us, incomprehensible. For that, I thank you.

    1. I’ve written about leftists and revolutionaries in terms of my personal experience. I know them to be quite crazy. But that doesn’t mean they are incapable of rational thought. They can organize and use strategy. And they are consistent, also determined. But they are driven by alienation. 170 years ago psychiatrists were called “alienists.” They treated crazy people.

    2. Evil people can be quite logical and rational. The reason Communists win above all others is their deception – they hide their evil. It comes out at moments, but they are aware they are evil, which is their superpower. They know they must hide their evil. It is an extremely rare combination.

      So we have hyper-evil people, who wish to rule the world, with eternal regimes in China and Russia, all the time in the world, and massive militaries, along with advanced foreign subversion techniques. They have no limits and can easily engage in criminal gangs, murders, drugs, prostitution, human trafficking, torture, bribery, etc.. very few nation states are like this.

      It was only a matter of time. If an adversary with no limits is allowed to slowly work on you, and you are not allowed to work on him, eventually he will make inroads. Eventually he will get small wins, and then bigger ones, etc… The past 70 years of subversion has been a 1-way street. We have this fantasy in America and the West that the good guys always win. Nonsense. Evil has won many times. There are entire nations that fell into complete darkness under the reign of murderers forever. We thought because our sphere stayed somewhat uncorrupted, that we were fine. We weren’t.

      What we have never seen ever before in human history is the entire world fall under the grip of utter psychopathic murderers with absolutely zero limits. We are talking about death and suffering on a scale that is unimaginable. It makes sense that the Bible talks about how God has to come back, otherwise “all flesh would perish”. He’s not saying he would kill them all. He’s talking about some other force that is so destructive that he has to come back. Even I, knowing Communists as I do, and knowing what they plan and what they might succeed in, have trouble imagining just how hellish the Hell on earth is that would result from them succeeding.

  9. Jeff, what are your thoughts on Russia pulling out of the last nuclear treaty, equipping their ships with nukes for allegedly the first time since the Cold War, and Putin saying Russia was facing an “existential” threat?

    Russia’s military doctrine allows them to pre-emptively nuke if they face an existential threat. I read that Ukraine has said Russia’s nuclear forces are on combat alert.

    So Russia’s ships and subs have nukes, they can deploy as many as possible due to leaving the treaty, they are on combat alert, and their military leader has said they are under military conditions which allow a pre-emotive strike.

    How are we not facing the conditions for the surprise strike? It seems every piece is in place. We know that it will catch us by surprise, it will be Pearl Harbor 2.0, and why could it not be now?

    I suppose I am just confused as to why you think they need to conquer Ukraine first. I still think that it’s possible that the entire purpose of Ukraine was to create a long, drawn-out conflict to create the pretext and reason for why they have to nuke the United States. I have been watching Russian television and they have been slowly bringing their people along, slowly psychologically conditioning them, having their puppets gin them up and constantly say that Putin is not doing enough, pacing and leading.

    This operation to brainwash the population as to the necessity of nuking the US would not be possible without Ukraine. It is a slow, methodical process.

    So I suppose my question is, why could we not be very close to the surprise strike?

    1. Yes, we are facing a potential first strike. Such a strike could occur at any time. So why hasn’t it happened already? (1) Because the United States might have some nukes that work, and waiting for a further weakening of the U.S. deterrent is more prudent than attacking now; 2) Russian military doctrine, tactics and strategy requires that armies move into territories that have been nuked to capture the ground. Right now the Russian Army is still putting itself together and getting combat experience in Ukraine — so it is not free to carry out its nuclear war mission. Ukraine must be secured first; 3) economic strangulation of the U.S., after breaking up its alliances and taking over Latin America, is a worthwhile objective so that America can no longer support its armed forces, is no longer prosperous or able to defend itself, and suffers an internal split over the shrinking economic pie; 4) massive unrest needs to be triggered in the U.S., and internal disorganization of the U.S. is desirable — which may take a year or two; 5) if vaccine deaths are rising and, and more bad news about them is coming, it behooves Russia to wait for the crisis to worsen — if only to reap the harvest when people turn against their governments.

      If Russia and China feel that the situation is getting away from them, that America is starting to see the danger and react, they might just launch a disarming strike against us. But that is not optimal as long as things are going their way.

      This should be clear. America still weakening. The communist bloc is still still strengthening. There is no reason for them to attack until the tide flows the other way. They are able to mobilize while we do nothing. If they can slowly leverage us, and break us down without nuclear strikes, so much the better. Marshal Sokolovsky, the great Soviet strategist, did not believe war could be avoided. But he did believe in accumulating the best possible pre-war position. And it makes sense.

      1. @JRNyquist: It seems like things have been heating up across the world lately, especially over the past few weeks. You have often spoken of this ‘overture’ situation, particularly in your interviews, and you’ve said that you think that we’ve been in it for a while now–perhaps that is true. Yet now it really does feel like we are in the, as you put it, ‘overture’.

      2. It seems that a very low-grade overture lasting two decades is possible, mainly because we are so clueless — our society has been under attack by “shadow forces” — since 9/11. But we have Russia and China openly mobilizing. Where are we countering any of this? Hard to believe we are so disoriented, so distracted by ideological narratives.

      3. 6) Allow more time for human resource departments to destroy our companies.

        Do I sound bitter?

      4. @JRNyquist: I was quite young during 09/11, and I know that this is oversimplifying what had happened, but things never seemed the same after that, culturally, at least.

    2. I think this is an example of what Perseus means.

      Nationalism or Nothing: Life in Modern Russia (Vice News)
      The only people allowed to protest in Russia these days are extreme nationalists, who want more war, not less.

      “Motherland, freedom, Putin!”
      “Sarmat and Poseidon missiles, let’s aim them at Washington!”
      USSR flags and cardboard cut-out of Putin at nationalist meeting
      “America has occupied the entire planet, except for North Korea. The only state America fears is North Korea… if we could redirect our missiles at America we would have peace and quiet now. We wouldn’t have this war.”

      It certainly seems like the Kremlin is working on their people to make them demand that Putin nuke America. Or at least give the impression of a groundswell of popular support. Listening to the old 2009 interview Jeff did with Victor and Marina Kalashnikov, post-Soviet Russia has been conditioning its people to hate America for a long time. This is yet another turn of the screw.

      Even CNN is seeing the One Clenched Fist, yet listening to other panelists on the John Moore Show you would think America is pushing poor little Russia to the breaking point by destroying its soldiers, cities and infrastructure without just cause. Oh wait. As you said, the One Clenched Fist was there before only now it is outlined in flashing neon lights. So we hear a lot of talk from conservatives/libertarians about how the US should pivot to Asia. Europe cannot be saved, it is doomed to wreck itself by incessant warfare, as we have already seen in the first 2 world wars. If the US lets Russia have one of the richest and most technologically advanced parts of the world, then the US can better concentrate its resources in East Asia to prevent Chinese aggression against our allies there. It’s not like the Russia-China axis benefits by having to only fight a one-front war in East Asia (but really against the US) instead of a two-front war in Europe *and* Asia.

      Worryingly, in a recent interview with the Hoover Institution, historian Stephen Kotkin said that the US/NATO have not increased their military-industrial capacity since the start of the Ukraine war. They were hoping that sanctions would be enough to damage Russia’s ability to wage war, but clearly this has not been the case (probably getting a lot more help from China behind the scenes). As a result, stockpiles of certain shells/artillery that was given to Ukraine are low. Of course, what matters even more is the nuclear deterrent, and no one is discussing that. Even if the moderate Left could relent from the green insanity long enough to rebuilt the West’s military-industrial complex, the Right will cry that the MIC is evil. I can see Russia/China holding off on the nuclear strikes as the economic strangulation and unreconcilable political divisions do their work on the US/West. And yet a country so unprepared for war as the US is supposedly trying to commit genocide against humanity with the Covid vaccines, and supposedly pushing for a direct war with Russia that it cannot win.

      1. Exactly right, Laura. We are sinking in our own problems — problems orchestrated by enemies who always seem to divert us into blaming Biden, or Fauci, or the Deep State. When do we ever recognize our enemy as a whole? — as the communist movement and the bloc countries? It would be like George Washington deciding he no longer needs to fight the British because the real enemy was Benedict Arnold all along. Maybe the British will come and help him against Arnold.

      2. Kotkin admits that Russia is likely to win a war of attrition because NATO is running out of ammunition.

        At the same time he claims that Russia’s initial plan was rapid victory and military occupation of Ukrainiane.

        Is it so hard to imagine that Russia deliberately chose prolonged war of attrition?

    1. The fact that this is now on CNN, shows we are headed into One Clenched Fist. But Americans still do not see the extreme danger they are in.

  10. “Any hint of impropriety or conflict of interest within the NIAID, NIH, or CDC should not be viewed with mere indignation or outrage.”

    Don’t forget the FDA and USDA. I personally believe that the nutritional guidance that we are given causes a significant amount of harm to the nation’s health.

  11. Throwing in my four bits:
    On the subject of hatred of Americans
    by old people in Gov. Context please,
    those people as a group are scared xxxx-less
    of being so broke that they would have to live in a tent
    on a sidewalk, or in a homeless shelter, in their middle
    age or later. (and that opinion isn’t even taking
    into account gov. workers as being security obsessed)
    In other words they hate Americans, but they are ‘sensible’.

  12. Last week my wife and I came down with our second round of COVID. Neither of us are vaccinated. The urgent care doctor prescribed Paxlovid to my wife but told me it was too dangerous for me to take because of my heart failure meds. A doctor who is a close friend called the next day and told me to throw my wife’s Paxlovid in the trash. He indicated that he had taken it following his last round with COVID and that he suffered a rebound that was far worse then the first COVID. He said that it could kill my 74 year old wife. We are both recovering and thank the Lord for his healing.

    1. Will this be our “new normal” for God knows how long into the future: having to stay away from doctors so as to not get harmed by them? I don’t think the medical profession has yet realised how heavily their questionable role in this whole madness has already ruined their reputation and trustworthiness, and – exceptions of truthful doctors aside – with good reason.

      1. I was nearly killed by a doctor 32 years ago. You could say that I learned the hard way. Doctors are indeed dangerous. And the further we slip into state managed medicine the worse it is going to get.

      2. Half are stupid, arrogant drones who parrot their “education”, the other half know the truth but must be silent or be banned from medicine.

        Ansel Keys’ crusade against animal fats has probably done more damage to Americans’ health than all their wars combined. Many have speculated that the modern “diseases” are simply the result of hyperinsulinemia bright on by glucose spikes, induced by the enormous amount of simple carbohydrates our esteemed medical “experts”, tell us are good for us. That, and the industrial machine lubricant known as “seed oils” that replaced Americans’ historic consumption of animal fats (butter, lard, and tallow). Those two major dietary changes have probably killed more Americans than any foreign enemy.

      3. Low-fat diets, seed oils AND artificial sweeteners. Years ago I had a Naturopath tell me my body was extremely acidic. I had a lot of inflammation as a result! I switched from an artificial sweetener to Stevia and started adding half a lemon to my water once a day. It totally changed my life!

      4. Re:
        [ JEFF NYQUIST says:
        FEBRUARY 22, 2023 AT 10:31 AM
        “…managed medicine…” ]

        I have a friend who was diverted to the Social Security Administration, away from his teaching position at a small, prestigious medical school back East. Not until first day on the job did they inform him of Project Prototype, where clerks would deny expensive tests and procedures that doctors request for their patients.

        They needed him to sign off on it, because the clerks weren’t licensed physicians. He was aghast, telling them that only the attending physician can know what the patient needs, and for him to deny the request on medical grounds would be malpractice. SSA advised him to find a job elsewhere, after having recruited him without being upfront about their hidden agenda.

        So, he transferred to the Veterans Administration. As an osteopath, he was head of rehab at the Jupiter, Florida VA, with a staff of twenty medical professionals under him. When came time for six month revues of staff, his boss told him that he gave a good review for a doctor who they had problems with before he was hired, and for him to change his evaluation of her. Again, he refused because she did good work for him.

        Shortly thereafter, some expensive diagnostic gear malfunctioned. My friend went to his boss and requested a repairman. The boss declined. My friend asked what he was supposed to do. The boss told him to cancel his clinic. My friend replied that it would take months for patients to get an appointment and that people would die. The boss shrugged it off, so again, my friend resigned on advice from his lawyer who wrote the resignation for him as under duress.

        My friend was a top notch doctor; not one complaint. No malpractice suits. He was never able to land a job as a physician again. Students he taught and old co workers where happy to hear from him and said he was needed, but when he followed up, they wouldn’t take his calls. Still licensed, he was never able to get hired as a physician again.

        After being beaten and warned by police in Florida and California, and overdosed by a Haitian doctor in a Catholic hospital, he became a refugee in Canada, where they told him that he could live and work there as long as he liked, but not as a physician, because that’s how powerful is the United States. Canada informed him that the US had been infiltrated by a foreign entity.

      5. Perseus: In addition to hyperinsulinemia, low-fat diets result in a deficiency of fat-soluble vitamins. Vitamins A and D are important for the functioning of the immune system, which not only fights infections, but also prevents cavities and suppresses cancer. Multiple fat-soluble vitamins are needed for proper physical and mental development, so low-fat diets are especially harmful for children.

      6. Re:
        [ JEFF NYQUIST says:
        FEBRUARY 22, 2023 AT 4:17 PM
        Canada is infiltrated by a foreign entity. ]

        China owns the, World Fair water front in Vancouver BC.
        Let me just say that the foreign entity that Canada says has infiltrated the United States, is one of the countries that, Fr Malachi Martin, wrote of in, Keys Of This Blood.

    2. Silver Dolphin: how do you know that you had Covid a second time? The tests are notorious for their false positives as well as false negatives. How do you know that you had just a case of the flu, or even a cold, at least one of the times?

      The normal medical result of having a disease is that you get natural immunity that lasts the rest of your life. I personally have not had the flu or even a cold since Feb. 2020 when I had something that was neither the flu nor a cold that in hindsight had the symptoms of Covid. Yes I’m fully recovered.

      I live in an area that has many Chinese nationals who went home for Christmas and New Year’s vacations. They very well may have come back bearing a gift for us.

      1. I only have the doctor’s test results to tell me my wife and I had the COVID. They tested us both for flu and covid. They said no flu, both of us had covid. I have to say that it was very similar to the covid I had 1 year ago but definitely not as bad. Last year (DEC 2021) when my wife and I got it, I managed to get into the emergency room with her. They threatened to call the cops but I would not leave. After 3 days in the ER, they could not get her oxygen levels up so they were going to put her in the hospital. They told me I could not go with her. I told them no way and took her home. My daughter got us an oxygen generator device and she was on that for 4 more weeks. I had prednisone for a neck injury, so I treated her with that till she recovered. Scary time, lots of prayer.

    3. That is a frightening story. I think the global warming narrative is illustrative. People believe it like a religion. The same goes for much of the medical nonsense, where toxic drugs are prescribed for people. Sabotage can often be the wrong idea, the wrong “science.”

      1. About two weeks ago, I had a devastating 90-minute phone conversation with someone I’ve known for twenty years, though we’ve not always kept in contact over all this time. The man, now in his late sixties, is a totally fanatical eco-Marxist collectivist and literally BELIEVES all the lies that are currently out there, hook, line and sinker (also, he is, faithfully, at least four times mRNA-jabbed). Typically, although he supposedly has higher education, he knows zero English (how is that possible?), which is why any of the countless sources I would have loved to feed him with fell on deaf ears (a convenient excuse, I would assume, as he could just as well use some translation software). At some point, given his wilful ignorance and sly dishonesty, I couldn’t hold back any longer and simply told him that he was confused and in need of de-programming from his leftist beliefs (he didn’t deny being a leftist, but refused the communist label). I began quoting Lenin to show him the insidiousness and opportunistic pragmatism of the Revolution. No reaction. I tried to explain to him that all so-called “Greens” not only started out, some fourty years ago, as deep-Reds, but have remained so to this day (and that they only strategically use environmentalism to bring down the economies and individual freedoms in the societies of the West). They’ve simply followed Rudi Dutschke’s maxim of a “long march through the institutions” and acquired an apparently more reasonable mode of presentation, by which they became acceptable for ever wider segments of society. No reaction either. Whatever I was trying to point out seemed completely novel, if not outlandish, to him. One could as well have talked to a robot! His prime hate objects (and he is indeed full of hatred!) are of course America, Trump, the multinational corporations, Bolsonaro of course, Christendom, and everything generally held to be “right-wing”. Yuri Bezmenov’s admonition came to my mind where he said that, once the process of “demoralisation” is complete, people won’t be able to assess even irrefutable facts any longer. It took me a whole day to recover from this horrifying experience…

      2. Yes. They cannot assess facts. They are demoralized. Alienated. Out of touch with real life. There is an emotion in it, an addiction to certain narratives — an emotion that needs to be fed with a constant narrative of anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity. What can you do?

      3. Religious beliefs are based upon imaginative ideas, but Scripture written by ancient, Hebrew Prophets, validates the King James Version of the Bible. Doctrines of demons, apostasy, is Prophesized as a sign of the End Times.

      4. “Religious beliefs are based upon imaginative ideas, but Scripture written by ancient, Hebrew Prophets, validates the King James Version of the Bible. Doctrines of demons, apostasy, is Prophesized as a sign of the End Times.”

        Agreed, but why limit it to the King James Version of the Bible? We’ve also got the Douay Raimes version as well, and that’s the oldest version known to man (at least, the oldest version that contains both Old and New Testaments).

      5. Re:
        [ OTNESSE says:
        FEBRUARY 24, 2023 AT 7:40 AM

        “…why limit it to the King James Version…” ]

        Only the King James Version, is translated from the texts found at Antioch, Syria. All other translations are translated from the corrupted, contradictory texts from Alexandria, Egypt; including the bogus New King James.

    4. Juice a whole lemon into a glass of warm water (not boiling) and down it as it is, no sugar, no other ingredients. It may be bitter and can be rough on an empty stomach, but every time I feel so much as a sniffle coming on, I do this and it nukes it the same day. I started this habit during some of the worst periods of Covid while I was living Riga and I never succumbed.

      1. Yes, you are essentially giving yourself Vitamin C. Vitamin C is one of the first substances dispatched by the immune system to areas of disease.

        Many have speculated that this is because it is an electron donator, whereas diseases steal electrons from our cells.

        Intravenous vitamin C was used to cure polio, among other conditions, in the 1940’s. Look up Dr. Frederick Klenner. He and other doctors were injecting large amounts, 15 to 25 grams. It is not a simple vitamin, there is something more to it. The problem with ingesting it orally is that there is a limit to how much your stomach will tolerate, usually 2 grams. Any more and it will get rid of it.

        The key to getting much higher levels of vitamin C in the blood plasma, should one so desire, is to either go to a clinic that specializes in intravenous Vitamin C, or there is a relatively new technology that encapsulates it in a lipid shield so that it can pass through the stomach unscathed. This is lypospheric technology, there are many fraudsters out there claiming to sell it, to my knowledge Livon Labs is the only one who actually does it. They have done a name change recently. This is an interesting tip for those who perhaps have higher levels of some disease and would like to try getting higher levels of vitamin C in their blood plasma without going to the trouble of IV.

  13. Brilliant, Mr. Nyquist. Sorry if my question is too supid or naive: what if we, the world’s population, are the carbon that the world’s elite wants to reduce and there is an agreement between the world’s power holders to carry out this herculean task, each one participating with their population quota of ‘sacrifice’?

    1. The problem is that the “world elite” leaks like a sieve. And there would be hundreds who would object for moral reasons. If you go to graduate school in the social sciences and humanities you will get a better idea of how things work in the bureaucracy — in large corporations and the government. It’s about molding thoughts to conform with narratives used to manipulate us.

      1. Mr. Walker: The simple answer to your question — foolishness. The Chinese population started shrinking some years ago. They are already importing “guest workers” — mostly just small numbers now from Vietnam and Philippines — to fill their factories.

        India is now the country with the largest population.

        It is partly because of China’s shrinking population that I expect a CCP invasion of the U.S. sooner rather than later. Maybe even this summer.

    1. “Coming out party…” That’s an accurate way to report it. They’ve been working together a long time. Interesting that they now feel bold enough to proclaim it.

  14. I think these are scary times indeed. With covid it is like a religion. No one wants to hear that the vaccine rollout didn’t work even though in Australia it is obvious from the excess mortality. It is impossible to have conversations with anyone of the cultural elite down here on the subject.

    It is interesting that a new term has been invented called Cooker. This term is applied to anyone who questions the narrative in any shape or form. It gets a lot by educated people. In fact educated people are the ones who go along with the narrative the most. I think they do this because they have learnt from our education system that you will go far if you mirror the thoughts of those above you whose position in life you crave.

    I find poorer or so called dumber people are less gullible and more able to resist the propaganda.

    In Australia we have a dictatorship of the shouty man. In that a lot of cities are run by one or two men who are themselves as gatekeepers or people of influence and power. It is hard to resist such people but resist we must as I believe the communists have used them to gain power down under.

    It should be obvious now that covid was an attack. The way it happened and the coordination around the globe with politicians everywhere saying the exact same message gave that away. We need to tread carefully but also boldly over the next year not forgetting the authority we were given in Christ.

    1. AussieP: I agree with everything you have written here. This is so obvious, when so many political mediocrities and parasites are jumping on this ludicrous COVID bandwagon, just as they jumped on the global warming bandwagon, and all the other ones that the communists have pushed from behind the Left. You see who is pushing it, and you know what it is.

    2. So heartbreaking to see what has become of our world, all by lack of vigilance, along with long decades of heavy infiltration! 35 years ago (not quite two years before the Berlin Wall came down), I travelled Australia for near-five months, and the country back then – famously! – was such a lovely place to be, with outgoing, hospitable and refreshingly down-to-earth people, not to speak of the vastness (and ruggedness) of the Australian continent. I met so many absolutely beautiful people, and on completing my road trip, having returned to my hosts on the Gold Coast, southern Queensland (I had sent in my colour slides for processing beforehand and was able to show them my photographic results), I was informed that I had seen more of the country than most Australians ever would:

      The quite Californian feeling of Surfers’ Paradise; the New-Yorkish student cafés of Sydney (complete with young, adorable waitresses who were actually MARRIED, can you believe it); people mixing in international youth hostels (no “racism” intended) who were ALL, still, from non-communist countries, and how harmonious it all felt; rescued by a bunch of Good Samaritans at the last minute on a treck out in New South Wales’s Blue Mountains (I had underestimated the length of the walk and recklessly started out without so much as a water bottle!); up and across the Great Dividing Range into Canberra (which is, not unlike Brasilia, pretty much a modernistic non-place); winding up into the Snowy Mountains, passing through skiing resorts with cottages that read, “House Tyrol” and the like; proceeding into Melbourne, from where I set out for a week over to Tasmania, hitch-hiking the island; back to Melbourne, bumped into a radio DJ from San Diego, Cal., who then was my travel companion, and how much fun he was; passed by the legendary Twelve Apostles along Victoria’s Great Ocean Road (breathtaking views!); the Italian atmosphere of Adelaide (and everybody seemed to be on a honeymoon there!); there was also an Aboriginal Dance festival going on: beaming back to the days of “Dreaming”; heading north on dirt roads, east of the Flinders Ranges, oftentimes through large numbers of kangaroos or hundreds of galah cockatoos, whose grey/rose-coloured feathering splendidly shone in the late afternoon sun; crossing the southern edge of the Great Salt Desert westwards (which, given my miserable, 14-year-old Corolla, was a bit on the edge); invited by an opal miner in Coober Pedy, who presented us, confidentially, his most outstanding treasures; up north the Stuart Highway to Alice Springs and from there to, as one was still allowed to say at the time (and climb it): Ayers Rock; on, ever further north, right into the tropics and setting out from Darwin into Kakadu National Park (where my companion might have easily been eaten by a crocodile, freely walking around, as he was, despite warning signs); finally back to the Threeways junction and from there all across the Eastern half of the continent to the shores of the Pacific at Townsville; up to Cairns and Port Douglas and for two weeks by plane to Papua New Guinea, which is yet a totally different story altogether. Also in PNG, hospitality everywhere. It wasn’t just the journey of a lifetime, it was ALSO pretty much the last opportunity to travel the non-communist world, not necessarily untouched, but still somewhat caught in its sweet and comfortable sleeping beauty slumber!

      Shortly after, communism’s “civil invasion” began, and soon nothing was as it had once been. Then came Clinton, Mandela, Blair, Schröder, Chavez, and 9/11. What was the West’s response (apart from an ill-advised “War on Terror”)? Indifference – even as world communism was pressing ever further ahead.

      So much “grief work” to do, and so little, if any, time…

  15. War is upon us whether we want it or not.
    More rumblings from Mordor…

    ‘US Hegemony and Its Peril’

    “Since becoming the world’s most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.

    The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage “color revolutions,” instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a “rules-based international order.”

    This report, by presenting the relevant facts, seeks to expose the U.S. abuse of hegemony in the political, military, economic, financial, technological and cultural fields, and to draw greater international attention to the perils of the U.S. practices to world peace and stability and the well-being of all peoples……

    ……While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

    Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries’ internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.”

      1. Addendum: “It [The U.S.] must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices”–perhaps China should take its own advice.

  16. What about the recently derailed train? Also China’s fault?

    American company moderna patented the spike protein gene of Covid in 2015. American establishment run many pandemic exercises simulating exactly the kind of responses that made no sense unless the goal was monopolist takeover of the economy.

      1. They understand the game is over for global capitalism unless a cataclysmic event happen. Think again who needed the pandemic. They hoped they can buy Chinese elites during 2000s, it failed. Pandemic was a desperate attempt to reverse irreversible process.

      2. I don’t think that Commit is very well versed in history. Nor in human interactions. Capitalism is the normative human economic model. The Indonesian fishing boat owner who has hired one or two crewmen to help with his fishing in his one fishing boat is a capitalist. The small store owner who has hired one or two clerks to help in his one store is a capitalist. The small farmer who farms his own land is a capitalist.

        Concerning the last one, I remember reading reports from before the so-called “collapse of Soviet communism” that Soviet farmers were allowed small plots of land, usually one to two acres, that was their land that they could farm which ever way they wanted, grow the crops that they chose, sell the produce in the open market and keep the profits. In other words, where they could be capitalists. That totaled about 3% of the land under cultivation. Yet totaled about 30% of the food produced, without which the Soviet Union would have starved. In other words, by allowing a small amount of capitalism in their food production, the Soviets made a large contribution towards feeding the Soviet Union.

        Similarly, when the Chinese switched from collective farms to share-cropping—another form of small farmer capitalism—that it was reported that they doubled their farm output. Capitalism works.

        Contrary to Commit, I very much doubt that global capitalism will disappear anytime soon.

    1. It must get boring having to type the same anti-American propaganda every day, blaming America for crimes committed by Communists. I wonder if you yourself even believe it.

    2. If you think China and/or the USSR would be incapable of something like that, let me remind you that Lenin actually managed to sabotage a charity during the Volga famines, well before he came to power, AND had orchestrated famines with the specific intent of wiping out peasants, often robbing peasants foods at gunpoint under the pretense of them “profiteering”. This actually led to a revolt that Lenin savagely wiped out. Derailing a train if indeed China is responsible would actually fall under the Leninist playbook easily.

    1. It certainly is a powerful post this round. I’m not a fan of giving pats on the back, but damn this is great work! Jeff is a prolific and exceptional writer as well as a great analyst, yet also generous with his time fielding questions here. Thanks for another great gem this round, you deserve a pat on the back this round, this was exceptional.

  17. Have you ever heard about Stefan Lanka? Lanka became famous in Germany because he forced the German Cout to admit that there actually exists no prove of a virus. Lanka states that we have a complet wrong idea about we humans are. He put emphasis about the rule of the spirit on materialism. Why is this important? Because if we actually know how we are, then we would also immediatley accept the idea that God created us.
    If you are interested in:

    There was a big fight in the Corona Comitee, between Wodarg Bhakdi and Lanka, Lanka is right, definitley.

    I think it’s very important.

    You can ask also Torsten Mann!

  18. A few little edits:

    In the quote from Chi Haotian, cannon is spelled as canon.

    In the quote from the Chinese about Australia, it says chewing gun instead of gum.

    In this sentence,”Without considering the history of American naivete regarding China and Russia, sasha jumps to a conclusion she has no real evidence for.” Sasha isn’t capitalized.

    Thank you! Please delete my comment.

    1. You missed one, D.U. LOL!

      “In a January 2029 article for the Harvard Gazette”

  19. interestinhly youmentiono Shane Warnene bigtmistakake. google Kerry Packer the end is coming for these bastards. just going to take time.we hsae the resources to make it happen.

    1. If this a pre-modern form of AI grammar? Does anyone know what he is trying to say?

      1. My abject apologies, I didn’t know this. Prayers for you. I wanted to know what you were trying to say. I’ll try to figure it out.

      2. If it’s any consolation, he didn’t make sense even when his typing was better. Of course, I hope it’s actually not true about the brain tumors.

  20. OK, so some questions. Just how does the WHO get the authority to impose vaccine mandates, lockdowns, etc *within* the U.S.**?? They have no such authority under the Constitution, as the Constitution recognizes no such international authority. Only Congress comes close to being able to implement such things. Unless the WHO has some sort of ‘work around’, but even that would require vast voluntary cooperation from elements of the U.S. government and federal/state bureaucracies/authorities. And just how would the WHO implement surveillance of all citizens within the U.S., even? Now on the other hand, there is talk of a new FBI building complex to be built somewhere around Washington, likely, and one article I read claims it will be larger than the Pentagon. I don’t know how true that is, but why might that be? The only reason I can think of is to place a massive data/server farm complex within its walls that would serve as a means to eventually surveil and track all citizens and residents on a continuous basis. But this would take some time to construct and implement. Perhaps that is the sort of mechanism the WHO has in mind to enforce its mandates, with each national government establishing the requisite computer complexes as enforcement mechanisms. Yet how would Russia/China figure into all this?
    Would they integrate themselves as ‘part of the plan’, even after a war with the U.S? Heck, according to what Mr. Nyquist claims, there wouldn’t be much of anyone left in the U.S. to track!

    1. There are treaties being worked on that could obligate us to WTO mandates and vaccine passports. A treaty is a kind of law. A Republican Senate would not accept such a treaty, of course. But another pandemic might see the Constitution nullified by the bureaucratic do-gooders working to “save us.”

      1. The World and the United States in particular, are under attack from every angle. The ingenuity of this wide onslaught can only be the result of many years of planning, by PhDs utilizing super computers. Every aspect of modern society is no influenced by cut backs. The libraries that I have used during the past three years, all limit public computer stations, irrespective of vacancies. This serves no benefit other than to condition people to get used to restrictions, like having to wear masks. To undo all these subtle restrictions requires bureaucratic hoop jumping to eliminate the bureaucratic hoop jumping, to deal with every single minute issue. It’s absolutely maddening. How they managed to implement such pervasive meddling is amazing.

        A basic premise of law, is that where there is a conflict of law, the original law takes precedent over the more recent. The Patriot Act for instance, which has become the equally ill-named, USA Freedom Act, conflicts with the Bill Of Rights and is therefore, unconstitutional. Why has it never been challenged? Who has actually ever been prosecuted under the USA Freedom Act? For the most part, it’s merely rear covering for what the NSA has been doing for decades. Americans have been spied on by their own Government and for the most part, nobody is the wiser. This is because when the NSA finds people committing crimes, the NSA can’t prosecute because despite the feel good legislation, it’s unconstitutional for them to be spying on us, and therefore a further infringement to enforce it. They would be admitting their own criminality.

        If Biden gives veneer of authority under color of law to the WHO over US Sovereignty, it can’t be enforced. Not until Biden calls in the UN Peace Keepers, Chinese and Pakistani nationals in blue helmets to go door to door in attempt to confiscate guns, that there would be a brave attempt to subjugate Americans.

        Bust a move, Biden.

      2. To deny public services or mandate restrictions on licensed businesses is easy. To coerce people to wear a mask is a bit more complicated. To coerce employees and students to take lethal injections, is more difficult. To force people to take shots is not so easy.

        China locked people in their homes; welding shut main doors to high rise apartment buildings, shutting off the water, and neglecting to deliver food. People were yelling out windows and jumping off balconies to their deaths.

        Unarmed Chinese citizens got so fed up that millions rioted in the streets, beating the tar out of armed police. Xi backed down. Of course we don’t know whatever became of the protestors.

        Greg Reese reports that they were relocated to concentration camps and exterminated.

      3. THE: I don’t remember where I read it, but someone said that CCP behaviors were changing away from the zero-COVID policy in September before the protests started. One must consider the possibility that the CCP made the decision to change the policy, sent agent provocateurs to get the protests going, and then used the protests to provide cover for the policy change, with the extra benefit of being able to identify who the least compliant are so that they could be eliminated.

      4. It’s too, bad that the CCP neglected to let the police in on the gag. They really got their axes kicked. Some say that the collapse of the Soviet Union was real, and that a pretense thereof, was a premeditated cover story for the inevitability, so that the US would hesitate in taking advantage of Russia’s apparent weakness.

      5. Re:
        [ JEFF NYQUIST says:
        FEBRUARY 23, 2023 AT 6:31 PM
        That is probably why they have not done it yet. They have more work to make it work. ]

        I’m sure they admire your optimism, Jeff, but there is no way to make it work without them destroying what they wish to preserve. They do seem a bit sentimental about the US Dollars that they’ve misappropriated, as if it will still be of some use in the future.

      6. Re:
        [ JEFF NYQUIST says:
        FEBRUARY 23, 2023 AT 6:31 PM
        That is probably why they have not done it yet. They have more work to make it work.

        I’m sure they admire your optimism, Jeff, but there is no way to make it work without them destroying what they wish to preserve. They do seem a bit sentimental about the US Dollars that they’ve misappropriated, as if it will still be of some use in the future.

        JEFF NYQUIST says:
        FEBRUARY 23, 2023 AT 8:41 PM
        “They”? ]

        Who do YOU mean by ‘They”, Jeff? Aren’t we talking about the majority of member nation states of the United Nations which support the World Health Organization, which will be the over riding authority granted by the treaties to which you allude?

      7. I’m not saying that Russia and/or China aren’t the ones dictating schemes to the UN, if any entity is.

  21. When I try to explain this kind of China poisoning the vaccines -idea to people, as a part of a larger strategy, they just say it is too complicated.

    But I dont think it is too complicated. I remember once when I was a child I picked the Bible from my parents book-self, because I had heard it is a very important book. I started to read, and one story stayed with me.

    In this story a prince from a neighboring tribe stole the daughter of the King of the Jews and took her as his wife without asking her father for permission. King of Jews was furious and they almost went to war because of this, but managed to reach an agreement. The King would accept the marriage if this tribe of the prince would convert to Judaism. Of course the prince did not know that one does not convert to Judaism.

    People of his tribe did protest against forced circumcision law, but since the law was passed they just had to comply. Then in the morning after the mass circumcisions the army of the Jews attacked suddenly to the city of the prince who stole the daughter. The men in the city were still lying in their beds in pain after the surgery. Jews killed all the men and sold women and children to slavery. The King took her daughter back home.

    ( Now I want to say two things. First I don’t have anything against Jews and I don’t believe any of those Jew-conspiracy theories. That is not the reason why I tell this story. History is long. All people have waged war. Everybody has committed cruelty. And war is cruel. I actually think their strategy was brilliant. The other thing is that I read this as a child decades ago and I am recounting it from my memory, so this might be very inaccurate. I do not intend to insult any religious people. I tried to tell it as well as I remember. )

    But the point is, that people could come up with schemes like these thousands of years ago. And yet they tell me it is too complicated for Chinese to try. I believe Mr. Nyquist is on the right track. But people here seem to think that China just wants to benefit from West financially etc.

  22. It goes without saying that the So Called Right in the West,
    still, still, still, has no one single web place where
    commentary is organized.

    I nominate this piece of writing by Jeff to slot 20.

    1. Mr. Walker, that is not true, websites are diverse in format, language, graphics, fonts, and content. It’s a shame you feel that way. Perhaps you site is perfect.

      1. Ralph,
        Of course they are “organized”
        but they pander to what is new
        and exciting, please as an
        experiment recall the titles of
        the last 500 articles you’ve read
        that you thought were important.

        Certainly people can be intense
        in their understanding, usually
        a sports event of some kind,
        I suggest that in one place
        intensity might be generated,
        around what is excellent and

    1. Just to prove a point, not my point, your point. It would be “that makes “three” websites in total.”

  23. My bad, I need to add the comment
    that I did not mean organize according to
    subject, I meant comments, articles, bits
    of information, etc. All arranged in order from Number
    One down to whatever, as in Billboard Charts for Music singles.

  24. In the Bible the people of God were willing to die to save the lives of others. Millions died in our country to save the lives of others.
    Esther said, “if I die I die” for she new she was born for such a time as this.
    God said you have to lose your life to find it, you have to die to yourself, your desires, your flesh and do the will of God. “Let thy will be done not mine.”

    It is Gods will for every one of His children to live to save the lives of others period. We have a famine of the true word of God. People think God is a genie in a bottle to grant them their wishes?
    He gave us eternal life and that is enough for us to do His will and not ours daily.

    Esther is a great example of the perspective we all must have in this moment.

    Thanks Jeff! God be with us!

  25. Interesting 17 minute video by Glenn Beck warning conservatives that Putin and Dugin are NOT our friends. I learned more about their version of Traditionalism:

      1. Dugin’s Lebensraum Russia complex is an extension of an extreme form of agitprop Malthusianism. Malthus is absolutely within the realm of materialist dialectic of the Marxist Leninists The zero sum game of materialism in the Soviet Union and post Soviet Russia is entirely based on it. This idea that the world is a fixed sized pie which can be divided in only so many finite pieces is not only from Malthus but an absolutely Marxist extension/conclusion/synthesis of the Malthusian calculation idea erring where the = sign in the equation comparing production rate to consumption rate is completely assumed, as well as the deriving work-redistribution equations.

        In effect, Malthus suffered an old syllogism in argumentation. He went on a trek to point at the quixotic way people were marrying, colonizing and creating mouths to feed without the production being able to keep up, not answering to any rule. The very quixotic panic-reaction to this “fact” happened to be no different than the quixotic character he attributed and accused people of exercising. Thing of the matter, marriage and having children however followed back then patterns answerable to consciousness and various religious authorities, and so his argument was moot since misery would be forgiven and the responsibility would be assumed by religious leaders. The involvement of public authority in this is very dangerous for the state itself as responsible agent. The US Constitution is clear on that, ie. that the state is at risk if it takes on the responsibility for the action of its people.

        Marx however saw an opportunity in agitation in this, and saw agitation as a political joker gaining the dictator popularity and yet irresponsibility. The dictator and the rabble are in an eternal violent relationship in that respect because the people, the crowd, as Le Bon insinuated, is inherently manipulable and quixotic in character. (Cervantes by the way spent time in prison getting educated or brainwashed by his islamist captors and learned about this “primitive” form of Kaliph dialectic in Algier). It serves the dictator in that respect and yet it is “blessed” by the dictator in return “favor”. That favor of satisfying passions is a poison, however, one often seen dispensed between dum juries giving the trial lawyers the fame and money for agitating clients and juries alike in return for no further accountability to the future reckless behaviors and crimes of such people driving them and others into misery.

        The religious authorities too were cowards and avoided the responsibility for the misbehavior of their flocks. They too turned to Marxism and intellectualism in that respect, with perhaps the Jesuites vulnerable to that trend. The current crop of Duginist Russian Orthodoxy is full agitprop based and might actually have managed to manipulate the current Catholic activism of Pope Francis in a “Malthus” dialectic.

    1. Some lesser personalities on Glenn Beck’s Blaze Media were pushing Russian propaganda pretty hard. Good to see a prominent figure on the right unequivocally warn conservatives against that.

      Beck does well to explain the difference between traditionalism and Traditionalism (made in Russia), so many people now are confused and think the 2 are one and the same. Dugin’s Third Rome Traditionalism is nothing more than another utopian ideology that wants to destroy the existing world and commit mass murder to build a more ‘perfect’ world. Isn’t it nice how Communism has come full circle. 100 years ago, the Communists set out to smash every aspect of traditional societies –absolute progress was the goal– now they want to destroy what’s left of those progressive societies in the name of restoring Traditional values. In both cases the main societies targeted for destruction are in the West. They’re either irredeemably bourgeois, or now, irredeemably progressive.

      It would be fantastic if Jeff could get on Beck’s show and provide a much-needed strategic context for Dugin/Putin’s fake traditionalism. Far from Dugin being a lone Svengali, whispering in Putin’s ear, they are both part of the old Soviet structures that never went away in Russia. He could explain how it is nothing more than a continuation of Marxist dialectics, part of a deceptive long-range strategy to crush the West. Once the Communist-controlled reality of Russia is established, it becomes easier to talk about China and the Communist bloc.

      “Traditionalism can easily be anti-capitalist, anti-Christianity anti anything it wants”

      So true. I remember over a decade ago, on a website, traditionalists joking how far they should go back in time before modernity appeared and started corrupting everything. I think the consensus was the Middle Ages. Other white nationalist types want to go back even further to pagan times, ie before Christianity inevitably put whites on the path of becoming weak and soft. Both strains of traditionalism are idealizing the past. And Russia is appealing to both by promoting traditional values/aristocratic Russian culture/Russian Orthodox Church militancy on the one hand, and on the other hand violent racism/neo-Nazism with neo-pagan overtones (eg the skull emblem of the Wagner Group). I get the feeling that people who are really taken in by Russian high culture of the 19th century, those who now see Russia as being more European than Europe, absolutely refuse to see the other side of modern Russia –the violent state-sanctioned gangsterism and insatiable appetite of the leaders for devouring their own and other people. East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet. Except in Russia, where everything is possible.

      1. Dugin’s mishmash of Julius Evola and Rasputin is problematic because it is dishonest. Ideology has this character. Why does anyone buy into it? Baffling.

      2. “Beck does well to explain the difference between traditionalism and Traditionalism (made in Russia), so many people now are confused and think the 2 are one and the same.”

        Agreed Laura. I think Beck did well with what he shared. There’s more he could learn from Jeff, Trevor, etc., but at least it’s a start in the right direction! It’s important for people to know what “Traditionalism” means to Putin.

      1. A group of environmental scientists on their way to inspect a massive explosion at a Bedford, Ohio metal manufacturing plant have all been killed after their plane crashed en route.

        Four scientists and the pilot of the plane, who all worked at the Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health, are dead after the twin-engine plane crashed shortly after take off from Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, Arkansas.

  26. One cannot but admit the dangerous quixotic nature of this vaccine panic roll out, This is the problem with panic, and that it creates unilateral decisions that can be disastrous, look activist and promote a totalitarian Quixotic character not unlike the way Don Quixote exerted on his poor hired squire.

    The playbook of Putin/communists is starting to be clearer in that light, and it is all about leveraging on the quixotic aspect of freedom and independence as a mean to promote unilateral agitation without authoritative protection for what one does as a result of that agitation. Don Quixote is a book that rejected the Knight following orders of God for the “knight” who did his own thing under his own “self authority”. The result is that this new “human” knight who actually inspired the Che movement acted without having a legal defense, ie. an authority to answer questions to his behavior with a hope of forgiveness and pardon. Putin thus encourages it in Russia very clearly (looking for a zealot to launch their nukes and blame the US for the “human atrocity making” just as al Qaeda hoped to benefit from fans it was not connected to), but also here: In Russia he is not a commander but a Lenin type crappy lawyer only protecting the “agitprop” and not his agitated clients which in Russia happen to be “patriots” and other assorted naive Russians and in the third world warlord war criminals who eventually end up hung by their own people or tried at International courts. Like a gangster lawyer, Putin always has plausible deniability for these crimes since he “only agitated” and did not give the orders. All his speeches appeal to the quixotism of the right wing gun totting freedom lover to his peril as well as “human” antifa types.

    I will venture to say that the highjack of any agitprop, be it against Darpa, jewish bankers or globalists stem from the same playbook. Similarly the trapping of our pharmaceutical industry and these criminally damaging vaccine campaigns follow the same script, Could it be that Biden and Co. suddenly see the writing on the wall, ie. that their being agitated is ow exposing them and all of a sudden they see Putin playing the good guy and crying foul? Then again, could it be that those abstaining at the UN are either part of the future enemies of Ukraine voting against it when the winds of this dupery starts working? Or could they see Ukraine not as an enemy, (and vice versa?) reflecting Putin’s language that he is not fighting Ukrainians but NATO? The vice versa here is a logical trap of the dialectic at hand.

    With the vaccine campaign we see an old African witchcraft dialectic at play with a modern world having lost the language tools of this dialectic. The defense against the dialectic is simple: how did we end up in this situation? If we are divided or getting killed, who threw a curse to divide/kill us? And if curse was thrown, was it really meant to divide us or was it targeted at someone else but ended affecting us first?

    This is the tenet of agitprop, curses and power actions at a distance dialectic of witchcraft which the monotheist religions were supposed to have solved for us but did not. As a result we do not have the old dialectical tools to combat Putin, but nor do we have the forgiveness and explanation of a God for our actions, and thus whatever we say or do is held against us instead of held against a responsible conscientiousness authority, Note that in Russia the Russian Orthodox church is another agitprop book and not a consciousness group, although it tries urge and coax the Russian consciousness of bravery, in emotional moral blackmail. Note also that our current Catholic Pope is very foolishly toying with activism instead of responsible answering to his flock. Things are getting blurred and for good reason, because this schizophrenia is paramount for the camouflage.

    Simply said, a freedom loving Ayn Rand type but foolish Libertarian take it all upon himself in “pure reason” when meeting the Kafkaesque situation of answering to a policeman and false charges. It is easy for a female like Ayn Rand to do because females or the feminine belong to God inherently whereas men have to earn that belonging explicitly (hence the wokist totalitarian conformist wave towards the female elephant cow pack that belongs to God/tribe/state). These are the right wing side of the foolish Don Quixote unilateral chivalry that answers to no one’s urging him to attack windmills. What curse indeed has befallen Don Quixote wonders his squire. The left wing side is the humanism of Don Quixote, this sort of excusing (but not forgiving) Don Quixote on his account of his own humanism and folly and not on account of someone he could blame for cursing him or ordering him to attack these “Giants”.

    In the case of Putin, it is obvious his lieutenants like Shoigu are absolute fools who are doing his bidding without his responsible protection of them, and, yet, they also intuitively cover their own butts with red tape, and they use that Wagner fool Prigogine and post-Soviet “capitalists” to take initiatives of their own. The Russian Zek mafia of the prisons have already characterized the Wagner boss as the laundry boy of the kingpins there and urged prisoners to not take his offers, saying they are a bunch of birds for doing so and do not belong, so to speak. Suffice to say that no one should be willing to take seriously the imbeciles of the Duma who act upon agitation and then try to agitate and incite others below into actions and self incrimination, much like a cop putting the pressure on a “suspect” to speak in his own name without counsel nor command to refer to.

    This is the gopnik dupe culture in Russia, and one not unlike the one waged on black people in the US that incite black men to attack police and do crime in quixotic manner in order to “show off”. And speaking of curses, Putin’s appropriation of the holocaust cause and of chasing Nazis from the more largely concerned jewish social mass should raise a few eyebrows but it has fallen silent surprisingly from Netanyahu even. Because, push come to shove, where does this dialectic eventually lead to other than blaming the division between Ukrainian and Russian slavs on a kabbal of “jewish banker globalists”, just as jewish leftist quixotic activists happened to have driven the black civil rights cause, only to have the more radical aspects of it retained (Malcom X assassinated for antisemite Farrakhan and same with ML King assassinated and replaced with Jesse Jackson and his cottery of radical quixotic young jewish leftist activists who later however often turn away from it and go back to God).

    This is an aspect of envy and redistribution curse that Goebbles actually observed, telling the German “thinking worker” to abandon their internecine squabbles between socialist and communist branches and join the Nazi party. Indeed, for reparations’ sake, it would be much more apt to facilitate black business tax breaks than having a democrat former slave owner kill a white person, take his money and keep the stuff in his pockets, Zimbabwe farm redistribution style. In that instance, what could prevent the dialectic from slipping into the “thinking black man” and see a black Goebbles urge him to solve the problem of racial division by blaming the more quixotic “jewish banker” for it!?! Actually Obama has come very dangerously close to this with the like of AOC flirting with islamist kGB Palestinian branches of antisemitic of feminism with narry a word.

    Obviously the liberal feminists in America are trying to push this inconvenient Epstein like connection to nasty people and antisemites in the unconscious, ie the quixotic movements are inherently blackmailed. Similarly our own government is showing an FBI embracing dangerously quixotic forms of activisms.

    Biden lately seem to have sobered up and reached out to the Hague tribunal. Of course the tribunal is not without its western leftist quixotic bunch doing the Putin agitprop bidding, ironically, one in the sense of the LGBT inasmuch as Putin agitprop without consequences the demoralized and humiliated Russian man and his Army launch the nukes unilaterally without his orders. Already the Navy revolt against the Soviet regime should come to mind, a Soviet Navy of “disciplined communists” who protested against the corruption of the Soviet system, in light of the let go of a Typhoon sub from its moorings lately, one which could see a Kgb penetration operation doing the “Red October” playbook of nuke launches only to blame America for it. Will our subs follow it and eavesdropping it in order to kill it to prevent it from doing the “rogue” deed, Wagner style?

    Is China taking us for serious or do we look the Quixotic to them? Are they on Putin’s side because they feel his destabilizing spread of quixotism is dangerous but at least he is no dupe like the West? Or is China going to realize that itmis getting trapped into unilateral activities exposing it? Will it go one clenched fist or will it feign and let Putin down?

    Unfortunately the Biden visit of Ukraine is a negative in light that China was visiting Putin at the same time. Biden should have given a visit to China and calling out to them on the BS of Putin instead of taken up the Ukraine Ayn Rand (she was Ukrainian anarchist) quixotism of it all, looking as if we are falling for that “democracy” self accountable self crucifixion trap? Are Zelensky and Ukrainian “anarchists” allegedly taking us seriously or are we the last dupes of it all?

    1. Zelensky was once put on the defensive by Putin’s call for peace, by saying that Russia would have to abandon all gains and make full restitution. Zelensky’s alternative is nuclear war.

      What fresh idea might China propose?

      I know, China will suggest that the United Nations occupy Ukraine, and Putin will agree.

      Zelensky will feign reluctance, but accede.

      Biden will declare China to be the saviors of civilization.

      1. The thing is, Putin acquired these territories through terrorist acts of filtration of Ukrainians. By extension the same thing happens in Brazil or Moldova, each of these nations facing possible filtration once under Putinist influence just as Putin tried to “purify” Ukraine when he had his puppets in power there – and now to a lesser extent in the Donbas doing the Mariupol cleansing.

        In that aspect the Azov batallion strangely fed that rationalization for Ukrainian filtration and Russification of Ukraine by genocide with his hordes of Russian looting parasites also present in Estonia.

        There is no peace possible so long Russia does not come clean on these filtration operations and the looting quixotic Russians in the Donbas and Mariupol are not held to account in some sort, repentant. But these people are culturally trained as gopnik worshipers. These filtrations campaign are also part of the Active Measures of Putin in social media and propping and influencing the “right conservatives” that would support him and his agitprop narrative in the US.

      2. The idea being, that if the UN can enforce the internationalization of Ukraine, than it can just as well be the administrator of the United States, and Israel.

      3. Can Ukraine truly defend itself? Can any NATO country in Eastern Europe defend themselves, sans NATO?

        Putin wrote to Biden before the war that Russia believes that Eastern European countries can sufficiently defend themselves without NATO membership.

        If that is a fair evaluation, why then does the US need to be sending so many billions of US Dollars, to Zelensky? Realistically, China has more than enough army surplus troops to dress up in UN blue helmets.

      4. There is a distinction in what you say. That is of course, that the United States and Israel can defend themselves. However, if Russia and China are the dominate influencers of the UN, and if Biden be their boy, then if Ukraine were to become internationalized under UN administration, then Biden might just tolerate the UN to enforce the Covid and Climate dictates of the WHO under the pending international treaties which you mentioned further above.

      5. Jeff was right – I was wrong.


        1. “Respecting the sovereignty of all countries.”
        2. “Abandoning the Cold War mentality.”
        3. “Ceasing hostilities.”
        4. “Resuming peace talks.”
        5. “Resolving the humanitarian crisis.”
        6. “Protecting civilians and prisoners of war.”
        7. “Keeping nuclear power plants safe.”
        8. “Reducing strategic risks.”
        9. “Facilitating grain exports.”
        10. “Stopping unilateral sanctions.”
        11. “Keeping industrial and supply chains stable.”
        12. “Promoting post-conflict reconstruction.”

  27. Ukraine War: US factories ramp up weapon production – Sky News
    One year later, the US makes an effort to ramp up production of artillery shells
    – 11,000 rounds per month roll off the production line of one factory; the Ukrainian military is firing 5000-7000 shells each day (and Russia many times that number)
    – the US military is investing $2 billion to ramp up production; one factory getting $240 million to modernize
    – The pre-Ukraine just-in-time supply chain is breaking down and stockpiles are shrinking, race against Russia to re-arm, it is expensive, safety standards slow the process

    Putin withdraws recognition of Moldovan sovereignty over Trans-Dniester region | Ivana Stradner |
    TVP World (youtube)
    Some interesting comments by Ivana:
    – Russia is trying to use Moldova, and also Georgia, the Balkans, to distract from Ukraine; hybrid warfare and possible attempted coup in Moldova is to make it seem as if it will be next to be invaded by Russia; the goal is for less military help to be sent to Ukraine
    – Kosovo is another issue that both Serbia and Russia have been exploiting; Putin (through his ally Serbia) is using paramilitary groups, info operations to destabilize the region and to project himself as a mediator and peacemaker, “Without me, you will not have peace in the Balkans so you have to make certain concessions on Ukraine.”

    The CNN article linked upthread, the one that talks about the growing alliance between Russia and China, also quickly tries to dispel the idea of any real threat to the US and the Western order. It says explicitly that China is not in a real long-term alliance with Russia, the Chinese are more about opportunistically poking the US and using the convenient war in Ukraine to do it. China is just cleverly trying to prolong war to distract the US from East Asia and maybe to cause Europe and the US to split further apart on China policy. At most China just wants to increase its regional power while damaging the US a little, but that’s it. No real danger. This kind of thinking is taken further by people on the right who see China’s turn to Russia as proof that the pro-Ukraine policy was a disastrous mistake, and that the US should focus on Asia rather than Europe.

    Jeff said upthread that there are 2 main ways that things could play out. Either the US/West wakes up sooner and tries to do something about the coming threat, or it does nothing of significance, and continues on the path of accelerating decline until the point comes when it cannot resist an attack by Russia/China even if it wanted to. The first option makes it more likely that the Communist powers will be spooked and launch a devastating attack faster than they intended to. But if West is not yet at the point of no return, it might be able to resist and survive, even though at great cost. But it needs better leaders too. Granted, the future is notoriously hard to predict.

    Which path seems more likely given the way things are right now? Has any Republican presidential candidate said anything insightful on the current geopolitical situation? Has any of them said something about the China-Covid-vaccine link, or demanded a full investigation of the Covid vaccine policy pushed by the highest levels of government?

    1. I forgot to add: Is any politician even discussing the need for the US to increase its nuclear deterrent, or at least make sure what we have works? Has anyone shown the slightest indication that s/he takes seriously the Russian media’s daily boasting of nuclear attacks on the West? If the answer is ‘no’ to all these questions, then that candidate is not a serious leader for the times ahead. Conservatives must wake up and demand a better class of leaders before it is too late.

      1. The way politicians are chosen today involves a consensus. If someone offers a serious objection, they are not chosen early on in the process. This allows agents of influence to exert a veto power in many congressional races. We can see what a circus presidential races are.

    2. I mentioned the artillery ammunition issue in this blog months ago. Only received insults from braindead American people who believe nothing but own propaganda.

      1. Late Peter Vincent Pry a year ago said the same. He said Russia wants a long war of attrition.

      2. @Mr. Walker: Who says Commit is Russian? Just because he’s a Communist doesn’t necessarily mean he’s Russian, he could just as easily be Venezuelan, Cuban, Nork, or Chinese. But I definitely agree he’s not trustworthy since he’s a Communist.

    3. Laura: Yes, the terrible thing about all this is the ongoing obliviousness of our “leaders” and pundits. This should not be difficult to analyze. During the Cold War we fell behind and times, but there were always those who wanted to strengthen, to fight back against communism. Today, this strange belief in our invincibility, in Russia and China having benign motives — even when defectors since the end of the Cold War have warned us (like Sergei Tretyakov and Stan Lunev). Any suspicious moves or events could be part of an attack. Yet nobody takes this serious. The whole vaccine narrative is suspicious. We need to question it, and this questioning should not be regarded as kooky. You look both ways before you cross the street, right? Would someone say to a child: “Looking both ways before you cross the street is paranoid. Nobody wants to run you over.” We now enter an era in which good judgment and knowledge have been set aside, as a matter of principle. Stupid arguments and false ideas prevail on every side.

  28. Your
    vision will
    become clear only
    when you look into
    your heart. Who looks outside,
    dreams. Who looks inside, awakens.
    Carl Jung

    vision will
    become clear only
    when you look into
    your heart. Who reads too much
    internet news stories dreams. Who looks inside, awakens.
    Carl Jung (amended by a student)

  29. OT.
    Robert Heinlein in his story,
    “Stranger in a Strange Land” created
    an occupational group; he called them
    “Fair Witnesses” , I just realized he probably
    got the idea from being in the Navy, whose
    professional ethic is not lying (2023??).

    It is just too bad people didn’t take the suggestion.

    I was trying to stimulate Commits brain cells
    into a more fruitful direction.

      1. Commit: What have I been wrong about? Everyone is wrong on occasion. It’s only human. For you to say that you have “always” been right tends to confirm my opinion of you. Having adopted communism, you no long look at the world through honest eyes, through eyes that teach you new things. You see only what you are supposed to see; that is, according to the communist world view.

      1. Commit,
        I’m curious, Jeff has been pretty clear
        about which writers he likes, in your
        opinion which of those writers misled
        him the most?

Comments are now closed.