…in February 2014, Putin’s ‘little green men’ … seized control of Ukraine’s Crimea. Consistent with Putin’s information warfare doctrine, several days prior to the invasion, Russian intelligence services … leaked a private telephone call between Assistant Secretary of State for Russian and European Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. The two U.S. diplomats in the intercepted phone call discussed who would be the best candidate among the top opposition figures, to replace the ousted pro-Russia president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich.
Rebekah Koffler, DIA officer[i]
Nothing in the Nuland-Pyatt conversation proves that American officials orchestrated the Euromaidan Revolution. In fact, with all the resources available to Russian intelligence you would think Moscow could have come up with something more substantial than a diplomatic non sequitur. Yet many Americans, convinced of the wickedness of their own country, have treated the Nuland-Pyatt conversation as proof that America stole Ukraine from Russia (as if Ukraine is an easy country to take over).
In 2014, when Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown, Barack Obama, a.k.a. Barry Soetero, a.k.a. Barack Soebarkah, was President of the United States. We have to ask ourselves: Why would Obama want to overthrow Yanukovych? Given Obama’s friendly policies toward Russia during his first term, it makes no sense. Obama was not interested in military competition with Russia. He did not build up the U.S. military and he was not interested in renewing America’s nuclear arsenal. Why, then, would he have bothered to take over Ukraine?
It is important to remember that Obama and Putin had both been Marxists. Obama was mentored by a communist party member named Frank Marshall Davis, who was suspected by the FBI of being a KGB agent.[ii] Putin had been a member of the Communist Party and worked for the KGB. (We also know that Obama was a Marxist when he attended Occidental College.)[iii] And yet, none of Obama’s autobiographical books explain why or even when he abandoned his Marxist faith. And this is true for Putin as well. In fact, Putin has said that he still likes communist ideas. He has even said that Christianity and Leninism are basically the same, that communism comes from the Bible.[iv] So when the Russian special services present the private conversation of Obama’s underlings as a plot to take Ukraine away from Russia, what do they suppose Obama’s motive was? Why would he do this? Barack Obama was not Putin’s enemy. And yet, this is somehow what we are supposed to believe.
And now that a war has broken out, with Russia invading Ukraine, it is disconcerting to hear people say that the West is looking for an excuse to attack Russia. But the West does not want war with Russia. This would be madness and everybody knows it. In fact, the side that wants war is the side that is prepared to win. That side is only found in Moscow and Beijing.
NATO is not ready for war. America is not ready for war. How can anyone believe that the West is trying to start a war they are not ready for? It makes no sense. And look at our internal divisions? We are in no shape to be fighting a war when we are so divided at home. And so, looking back on Victoria Nuland in 2014, we do not find an international mastermind. We find a sorry excuse for a public servant making nasty remarks that are being taped by Russian intelligence. I submit that America’s diplomats lacked the basic competence required to organize a coup in Ukraine. And so, the masterminds of this present war are not in Washington or Brussels or Davos. The masterminds are in Moscow and Beijing.
It is sad to say, however, that many otherwise intelligent Americans mistake Russian pre-war propaganda for proof of American wickedness. Consider Ted Galen Carpenter’s 2017 piece at the CATO Institute, titled “America’s Ukraine Hypocrisy.”[v] Here, Carpenter suggests that two diplomatic blunderers, blabbing to each other over an open phone line for all the world to hear, inspired and directed a revolution in Ukraine. That really is an extraordinary thesis. Carpenter accepts Moscow’s interpretation of this call on its face and pours it through the sieve of his distorted political imagination. Carpenter’s final product confuses the antics of Senator John McCain with a vast revolutionary conspiracy even as he ascribes omnicompetence to Obama’s political boobies. What does Carpenter think our diplomats chatter about in private? Does he think they talk about the weather? A diplomat on foreign soil represents his government’s views and interests. Demonizing those interests is, of course, in the interest of America’s enemies. Carpenter, thus, does not know on what side his own bread is buttered. And he is not alone.
Regarding our country’s blameworthiness, let me clarify, so that nobody mistakes the message or the nuance. Are America’s leaders honest? Not entirely. It does not follow, however, that America’s leaders are the authors of all the mischief in the world, or all the evil, or that they have caused the war in Ukraine. And here is a word to the wise: if you want to talk about wicked rulers, talk about the leaders in Moscow and Beijing. Think of Russia’s gulag with its political prisoners. Think of China’s laogai and the killing of innocent people to harvest their organs. Did you know that the police in Russia and China use torture? Their citizens have no real rights. Look at the way in which China has crushed Tibet and Ukraine is being Crushed by Russia. Think of what has been done to the Uyghurs and the Chechens. Those who have no sense of history might pontificate on the corruption of America, but our worst politicians are tearful little girls when compared to Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. The embezzlements, the muzzling of countless millions, the wholesale looting of countries, the killing of journalists and freethinkers, the poisoning of the human mind, and now the destruction of Ukraine.
Americans who embrace Russian propaganda seem to think that if American politicians lie, then Russian politicians must be truthful. The corollary of this error follows: That if America is led by bad men, then Vladimir Putin is a good man. The correct syllogism, however, is found in Swiss historian Jacob Burckhardt’s statement “that power is in itself evil.”[vi] Putin is possessed of more unchecked power than any American politician. That is why Putin is more evil and more dangerous than the President of the United States. The corollary to this is that the Russian government has more power over Russians than the American government has over Americans.
“Every power,” noted Jacob Burckhardt, “as long as its period of growth lasts … has no regard for the rights of the weaker.”[vii] Burkhardt’s associate, Friedrich Nietzsche, wrote that a state “is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: ‘I, the state, am the people.’”[viii]
The state is a fearful master and must be crafted with many checks and balances in mind. And the biggest check on state power is the people. It is shameful, in this context, that so many conservatives are condemning Ukraine as a corrupt country when, in truth, the Ukrainian people have put us to shame. Please note: In December 2004 there was a crooked election in Ukraine; but the Ukrainian people did not accept it. They began what was called “the Orange Revolution,” which forced a revote. And then, after mistakenly electing a Russian stooge in 2010, the Ukrainian people drove him out of office with the Maidan uprising of 2013-2014. Meanwhile, the Americans have failed to correct a fraudulent election and to drive their Russian (and Chinese) stooge from office. Therefore, it hardly seems fair that Americans should be passing judgment on Ukraine as a corrupt country.
Furthermore, Ukraine has been bombed and invaded by Russia – the world’s premier nuclear power. Look how the Ukrainian people have risen to the occasion. When America is bombed and invaded, I hope and pray that Americans show the same spirit of resistance.
Diana West recently wrote a column in which she quoted my remark about feeding Ukraine to the Russian crocodile so that we might be eaten last. She then suggested that America may have already been fed to the crocodile. But this cannot be the case. There is no gulag here, as yet. Our freedom of speech remains. If invaded, our troops would resist even as the Ukrainians are resisting. Perhaps my use of the crocodile metaphor was imprecise. Perhaps we have been stung by a snake whose venom serves as a kind of digestive juice; for America is too large a meal for swallowing without careful preparation. The communists behind the Russian and Chinese regimes have, indeed, injected America with poison; and this poison is tenderizing and dissolving us from within. No doubt! Yet there may be an antidote; and, as long we are not inside the reptile’s stomach there is hope.
For those who think the leaders of the Democratic Party are genuinely opposed to Moscow and Beijing, please review the following linked videos. The first one shows Obama talking about his communist mentor, Frank.
Then there is this “hot mic” exchange between President Obama and Russian President Medvedev in March 2012:
Next watch Obama sharing a joke with Vladimir Putin, now returned to office as Russian president, during a June 2012 G-20 meeting.
Links and Notes
[i] Rebekah Koffler, Putin’s Playbook: Russia’s Secret Plan to Defeat America (Kindle edition), pp. 158-159.
[ii] Frank Marshall Davis – KeyWiki.
[iii] Interview: Obama Had Marxist Vision For US At Occidental College – Freedom Outpost (investortimes.com). Obama reportedly told one of his classmates, “There’s going to be a revolution, we need to be organized and grow the movement.” According to Dr. John Drew, “I know Stanley Kurtz’s book, Radical in Chief, that Obama had ties with the Midwest Academy. Kind of like the socialist training ground for America. I think that most Americans don’t understand that Obama has a longstanding tie to Marxism, that is even longer than his ties to Reverend Wright.”
[iv] Putin Says Communism Comes From the Bible, Compares Lenin to a Saint (newsweek.com).
[v] America’s Ukraine Hypocrisy | Cato Institute
[vi] Jacob Burckhardt, Reflections on History (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1979), pp. 67.
[vii] Ibid, p. 66.
[viii] Friedrich Nietzsche trans. Thomas Common, Thus Spake Zarathustra (New York: The Modern Library), p. 49.
Quarterly Subscription (to support the site)
JRNyquist.blog
$15.00
375 responses to “An American Plot”
Explosions have been heard on the outskirts of the western Ukrainian city of Lviv after Russian forces launched an attack on a military base just 12 miles from the Polish border, killing at least nine people and injuring dozens more.
According to Ukrainian sources, Vladimir Putin’s forces had launched a missile strike on the International Center for Peacekeeping and Security, also known as Yavoriv military complex, just before 6am this morning.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10607611/Putins-forces-strike-close-Nato-border-Russia-targets-military-base-20-miles-Poland.html
The Partnership for Peace (PfP) is a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) program aimed at creating trust between NATO and other states in Europe and the former Soviet Union; 20 states are members.[1] It was first discussed by the Bulgarian Society Novae, after being proposed as an American initiative at the meeting of NATO defense ministers in Travemünde, Germany, on October 20–21, 1993, and formally launched on January 10–11, 1994 at the NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium.[2] According to declassified U.S. State Department records,[3] President Bill Clinton characterized the Partnership for Peace as a “track that will lead to NATO membership” and that “does not draw another line dividing Europe a few hundred miles to the east.”[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_Peace
I’d like to comment a little on what was mentioned about the Covid-19 pandemic. I think that there were forces at work in 2000 and 2001 (and continuing today) working to sow division, distrust, and disinformation. I think that much of the covid skepticism, the anti-maskers, and the anti-vaccine rhetoric we heard was fanned and amplified by the Russians and Chinese. It has been documented that the Russians had been sowing anti-vaccine disinformation for years prior to the pandemic. The black lives matter protests were also part of this campaign. They were working to stir up both the left and the right to get us all fighting. This is all part of the 21st century hybrid warfare doctrine that preceeds the traditional kinetic warfighting domains of land, sea, air, (and space) with cyber and information warfare operations. I think these last two domains have been used in a preparatory phase, to soften up the target, similar to the way artillery has historically been used prior to the main assault in a major offensive. Our enemies are now moving to include the kinetic warfighting domains, but I still expect cyber and information warfare to continue to be employed. This is why we need to be very careful about the messaging we get on the internet and reshare. Personally, I don’t want to be made a “useful idiot” acting as a tool for our adversaries.
You want to be a human guinea pig, instead of testing the mRNA lethal injections on real ones for ten years, like they were supposed to do, before President Trump exempted it from the FDA standard required protocols, go ahead, but don’t be selling that snake oil to me.
That seems a bit vague, to me. Specifically, how is the anti-vaccine (keeping in mind that there are some of us who are not against vaccines in general, but rather against the new mRNA technologies being used without sufficient long-term testing) tied to Russian propaganda? The area of genetic engineering (GMO technology, etc.) is wide open and completely unregulated unlike many other industries. It seems to me that while humans fret about being destroyed by nuclear weapons, the more likely scenario is that we will destroy ourselves by means of this technology and the so-called Transhumanism movement. Additionally, I have religious objections to some of this technology and would not use it even if it were 100% effective. I would argue that the divisions were sown by the releasing of the virus, itself, since people quickly become hysterical when they perceive their health and well-being is threatened. As for me, I have several “comorbidities” and a serious chronic illness (chronic pancreatitis) and while I wear the masks (to respect those around me), I have not taken any of these experimental treatments, nor do I worry about dying of Covid. That’s in God’s hands, not mine. Being chronically ill has given me a very different perspective on the whole issue. Oddly enough, many of my family members who were “vaccinated,” became ill with Covid, despite all the precautions. I honestly do not see a connection between the lockdowns, mask and “vaccine” mandates and the Russians. I do see many divisions since the virus was released whether intentionally or not.
The mRNA Covid serums include materials from aborted baby fetuses, for one religious consideration. It alters human DNA with Osterized, Hydra material, as well. The Hydra is a fresh water animal which when severed regrows two Hydras in it’s place. That’s not to mention the self assembling magnetic nano particles, and virus shell fragments from HIV and Ebola.
Technically, there are many strange things related with how western nations addressed the Covid19 problem. First of all, in January 2020 they did not closed conections with China, even when chinese autorities were saying that China was in “a very grave situation” and millions were under lockdown. By that time, there were many videos showing chinese falling down on the streets, but the west was in total denial with the problem. Then, when the disease arrived to Italy and later to New York and London, health autorities just copied China’s reaction with very rigorous lockdowns, a thing that had never been done in world history on that scale. There was very little scientific background to support those lockdowns, but they did it anyway. Worse, they chased and censured everyone with a different opinion. It was also very strange that many scientists, like french infectologist Didier Raoult and Nobel Prize Luc Montagnier, were saying that using repurposed drugs, like hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc, was a safe and effectivie way of reducing the burden that this biological weapon could cause. But anyone who sided with those researches was also censured and chased. By no means, in 2020, being against restrict lockdowns and advocating for the use of reporpused drugs could be russian disinformation. Why were people chased that time for having a different opinion? Remeber that were Democrat party´s governors who were advocating restrict lockdowns and chasing doctors who were trying to save people´s lifes. In Brazil, the country I live, happened the same thing. The more conected with China, the more the politician was in favor of those public health policies. Why? How come our intelligence services did not note that?
It was in this context that the vaccines were developed. In warp speed, with no time to really know what can happen to people in the medium and long term, not to mention the many side effects that VAERS show in the short term. And it was also in this background that many rightist groups started to share the crazy Idea that there is no virus, that masks have zero effect, that vaccines were magnetic and have nanotecnology that activates with 5G. A friend of mine almost died because he really believed there was no real virus. Another friend developed an autoimmune disease after his second Pfizer dose, he is not in a good shape too. Olavo de Carvalho, a brazilian philosopher, used to call this situation “diabolic confusion”.
You make factual observations. My doctor told me more than a few years ago, that a surgical mask does not block a virus. That’s not what they are intended to do. He cited the Boy in the Bubble, as case in point. My doctor didn’t want to discuss why people get sick after Flu shots, saying that ‘immunology is a very complex subject.’ He didn’t deny that they do. The patents for the mRNA gene editing serums include what Fauci said to Congress is contained, and what Dr Robert Malone the inventor says is contained, in addition to other toxic substances, metallic particles, and parasites found by independent researchers.
Fauci tells Congress some of the ingredients included in the mRNA Covid shots:
[ The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce will hold a hearing on Wednesday, December 4, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. in the John D. Dingell Room, 2123 of the Rayburn House Office Building. The hearing is entitled, “Flu Season: U.S. Public Health Preparedness and Response.”
Streamed live on Dec 4, 2019 ]
Very good points. We saw videos of people in China literally dropping dead in the streets and the US really did nothing to stop it (given all this), allowing people to enter from that country and so on. All of the policies eventually undertaken were definitely in the context of Operation Warp Speed and the development of these new gene-editing treatments. Incidentally, I have never seen a replication of scores of people just dropping dead in the streets as they purportedly did in China in any of the other areas (pretty much everywhere) where COVID was a problem. China has more than one strategy that it is using against the US apart from potentially planning to oppose us militarily. If they can promote a psyop and convince people in the West to limit their own freedoms, so much the better. I don’t deny that the virus is very real, but its danger was exaggerated from the very beginning by the Chinese (and others) to push various anti-freedom agendas. China also likes to invest in the US and build infrastructure close to US military bases so it can monitor what the US is doing — like the proposal to build a Chinese-owned corn processing plant in the Grand Forks area close to an air force base (if memory serves). It seems to me that China employs strategies on multiple fronts to oppose the West.
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1503094116275605508?s=21 Russia ask China for military help in the Ukraine.
Thank you BB. 🙂 Here is more info about it:
https://esgtelegraph.com/latest-news/us-claims-russia-has-asked-china-for-military-help-in-invasion-of-ukraine/
From the article:
“Before leaving Washington on Sunday, Sullivan warned China not to try to “bail out” Russia by helping Moscow to circumvent the sanctions that the US and its allies have imposed on President Vladimir Putin and his regime.”
And yet….
“With Russia now officially cut off from both the US Dollar and the Euro, Russia’s VTB Bank is seeing a surge in Chinese Yuan deposits, attracted by the bank offering significantly higher interest rates as Putin shifts focus to ‘friendly’ nations.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/yuan-deposits-soar-russian-banks-after-swift-cut
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1503094116275605508?s=21 Russia asks military help from China in the Ukraine.
I don’t think this is the place to get into a debate over the safety of the MRNA vaccines, but I will say that I studied the matter out a lot before deciding to receive the vaccine. I was satisfied that whatever small risk that the vaccine posed was much smaller than the risk from the virus. But each person should do their own risk/benefit analysis based on their own health situation. One year on since receiving the vaccine, and my wife and I have had zero ill effects from it, so clearly it was the right decision for us.
I find it a bit disingenuous that the same people who were ridiculing those who were concerned about the virus as “paranoid” and “living in fear”, are the same people making sensational and unfounded claims about the safety of the vaccines. This, despite the fact that the risk from the vaccine is orders of magnitude smaller than the virus.
Guy, I agree that while the vaccine is risky, Covid is riskier. Ninety-nine percent of the people dying from Covid are unvaccinated. Vaccinated people can still get the disease, but they’re far less likely to be hospitalized or to die from it. To me, that’s the fact that tips the scale. It’s a question of which is the lesser evil.
Yes, but it should be a choice, not a mandate. Since the mRNA “vaccine” does not prevent transmission, but only mitigates symptoms, the traditional herd immunity arguments applied to traditional vaccines do not apply here. I am only speaking against mandates, which run counter to basic notions of human liberty, especially in this case where the “vaccines” do not operate as traditional vaccines do. I don’t care if they are effective or not, because my objections to them are religious in nature.
Yes, any vaccine has some risk to it, and there will be some small portion of the population that will have an adverse effect, but the overall risk to the general population is very small. Nonetheless, each person should evaluate amy vaccine against their own personal health circumstances to determine if the benefits outweigh the risks.
My point for bringing this up however was to point out that there has been a deliberate campaign by the Russians to exaggerate and inflate the risk, to cause division, doubt, and mistrust of our institutions.
Sorry about jumping in on Covid, because its not what Jeff’s piece is on, but Gretchen, you are quoting extremely wrong statistics regarding covid. Covid is by far less risky than the experimental gene therapy. the % death risk for vaccine death is 3% where as the majority of people its under 1% unless the person is obese or comorbid. As of now, 26K+ have been known to have died in the US within weeks of getting the vax–this if from CDC’s own VAERS data base. The majority are now the vaxed who are winding up in hospitals or falling over dead at a young age. Please do not get your science from the mainstream media–they have been lying on covid from day one.
Gretchen,
I don’t think calling the vaccine “risky” is quite right. It might be more appropriate to say there is some risk. But people need to have a sense of proportion. although there is risk, it is exceedingly small, notwithstanding the claims of many vaccine alarmists.
Again, you speak in generalities. Not all people who are against the mRNA treatments and viral vector vaccines, which both use gene-editing technology, are against all vaccines. And, while not all people who want to protect themselves from COVID become hysterical, the declaration of a pandemic and so forth lends itself to creating artificial hysteria. As I said, when one suffers from a very painful chronic illness, living and dying become relative terms and you learn not to fear these things, since they are often used to manipulate people. I saw in my own community people yelling at each other — some because they weren’t wearing a mask and others because they were, and my overall impression is that people were doing things they would not normally do if they were not afraid. Some of the fear was justified and some of it probably not. As I said, I wore a mask when there were mandates to respect the fear of those who were convinced of their efficacy, but given the fact that no specific mask was mandated, it is ridiculous to think that some of the homemade “masks” that I saw would protect anyone from anything. Rather, it played into their fears and the wearing of a mask — any mask — helped to allay these fears. Russia spoke against the Pfizer vaccine to promote its own vaccine to other countries — especially Central and South America – which is also based on new gene-editing technology as a viral vector vaccine.
EMILKC,
I don’t really want to argue over the specifics of the pandemic. I’ve already had two years of that, and I think I speak for a lot of people that we are ready to move on. I only bring it up, because of it’s relevance to Russian hybrid warfare. They have taken various hot button issues, and fanned the flames of division, dissent, and distrust to weaken us. I don’t want to be manipulated by our enemies to hurt our country. We need to think big picture in the context of the coming global conflict between east and west.
GUY – I really don’t necessarily disagree that Russia likely uses some of the wilder conspiracy theories to send people down rabbit holes, sow unreasonable levels of distrust against western governments, etc. — it certainly has a history of that sort of thing — but I just don’t see it specifically with regard to COVID. You could be on to something with regard to some of the broader agendas (anti-vax), etc. I think with regard to its hostility toward the Pfizer vaccine, it all boils down to competition with its own version, which it heavily marketed in Central and South America and elsewhere. Ultimately, it was based loosely on the use of similar technology, at least in the broader sense of gene-editing technology. Honestly, this sort of technology scares me more than nuclear technology or even artificial intelligence, because its evolution and development has the potential to outpace our ability to assimilate and regulate it.
The safety and effectiveness of a vaccine takes ten years or more to ascertain, thus the FDA protocols. I a dozen dogs die, they don’t test on humans and the project is abandoned. So, far, hundreds of thousands of people have already died as a direct result of taking the mRNA lethal injections. There is a cognitive dissonance amongst those who so foolishly took the shots. Spike proteins will be continuously produced in the bodies of the DNA altered inoculated, causing prion crystals to abundantly be produced, resulting in Mad Cow or Alzheimer’s type disease, along with Parkinson’s. Those who survive that will acquire an auto-immune disease, similar to AIDS. The hope of those such as Fauci, is that ultimately there may be at least one subject who survives all of that to become a new, trans-human with superhuman abilites, and a computer overridden brain, to take over from the senile one with no reaming will to resist commands over 5G. Furthermore, modifications to DNA, or upgrades can be made to the subject, over 5G, too.
THE,
Over 10.9 billion doses of the covid-19 vaccine have been administered worldwide:
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/
If any of your claims were true, then it would have shown up by now.
Today, our best estimate of vaccine fatalities using the VAERS data is that the US Government is responsible for killing 388,000 formerly healthy Americans. For no reason or societal benefit. Under the guise of saving them.
And we’re not done yet. Those kids with myocarditis? Half of them could die in 5 years. We just don’t know. Prion diseases… we don’t know. Autoimmune diseases… we don’t know. Reproductive issues… unknown. Original antigenic sin? Possibly. You get the idea.
By contrast, the Vietnam War was a long, deadly struggle that took place from 1954 to 1975 between North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The U.S. National Archives shows that 58,220 U.S. soldiers perished over the 21 years. Here, we’ve killed more than 6 times as many people in a fraction of the time… just 11 months.
No one in mainstream media will dare talk about this. They won’t even ask the question. Not a single reporter.
Nobody in Congress will discuss it either. I tried to bring this information to the attention of Congressional staff, but they have ignored my requests.
Of course the FDA and CDC have no comment other than they “disagree” with me. They won’t say why. Wow. We have a discrepancy of 388,000 Americans dead and they won’t even say why I got it wrong.
I’m guessing that they can’t say why because I used their numbers (they maintain VAERS and CMS) and their methodology and there were no math errors. So they have to go with the “hand waving” argument that “we disagree” since they can’t go with facts, evidence, data, or methodology errors.
As for all the bogus arguments about VAERS and causality that are used by the “so-called fact-checkers” to attack my work, I thoroughly dismantle those in my 63-page article. That is why none of the people at the FDA or CDC are willing to talk on the record to me: because I know how to dismantle their bogus excuses for looking the other way. They won’t talk to any of my associates either. They just don’t want to hear it.
Let me know in the comments if you find an error.
Finally, I know some of you are still unconvinced by all the data including the stunning athlete data. I’m OK with that. I just have one request. Please consider sharing this article with your social network before you get your booster. OK?
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/latest-vaers-estimate-388000-americans?s=r
Estimating the number of COVID
vaccine deaths in America
By Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose, Mathew Crawford
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Deaths.pdf
“I was satisfied that whatever small risk that the vaccine posed was much smaller than the risk from the virus.”
The calculation will depend on the individual. For younger individuals who faced very little risk from the virus, the (low, but relatively substantial) risk of adverse events from the vaccines was a real concern. For older individuals or those with comorbidities or immuno-compromised, the risk of severe symptoms from viral infection far outweighed the risk of adverse events from the vaccines.
Anthony,
I agree. It’s an individual risk assessment, based on your person heath state.
Here are a few articles to illustrate my point about Russian disinformation on vaccines:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-disinformation-campaign-aims-to-undermine-confidence-in-pfizer-other-covid-19-vaccines-u-s-officials-say-11615129200
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/covid-19-disinformation-backfires-russian-deaths-climb-eu-says-2021-10-21/
Yes, but the reasoning is faulty, because the purpose of Russian disinformation is likely to promote it’s own version of the “vaccine,” Sputnik, which also uses the same technology. Regardless, people should be free to make their own decision about what to put in their body. This is a basic human right in free society. As I said, I don’t actually care how effective the technology is as my objections to it are religious and philosophical.
Emilkc, agreed. But what you’re objecting to is the mandates, not the vaccine. There’s a difference. I’m totally with you on the mandates part. They violate our freedom.
EMILKC,
I have no argument with you on mandates, especially a federal one. I don’t think it should be compelled but instead encouraged. Persuasion, not coercion should be used to convince people to be vaccinated.
You might be able to make a case of a mandate for the military, since this has been required of our armed forces for decades, and is vital to insure combat readiness. But I don’t believe mandates are appropriate for the civilian population.
EMILKC,
I’m not quite clear if your comment was directed toward me (the format for this comment section lends itself to confusion about who is replying to what), but if it was, please consider that there can be more than one objective for disinformation. Yes, there are the reasons stated in the article, to discredit the competing western vaccine to the benefit of the Russian vaccine, but there can be a larger strategic objective as well, of sowing generalized division, and distrust. It doesn’t have to have an exclusive or singular purpose.
“I’m not quite clear if your comment was directed toward me (the format for this comment section lends itself to confusion about who is replying to what),”
That’s why I love reading the blog on WordPress. It’s clear who is responding to whom. LOL!
Interesting.
There is disinformation coming from bad actors on both sides – foreign and domestic. Adversarial governments wish to sow confusion and erode trust in our institutions – that is a given. Unfortunately, our institutions and government have undermined their own credibility by actively suppressing legitimate debate and evidence regarding the risks associated with the mRNA vaccines throughout the pandemic. These concerns have been brought up repeatedly by Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Chris Martenson, etc, who arrived at their positions through reviewing clinical studies and/or their own clinical practice.
I understand you are not interested in debating this in detail, so I will simply say that I agree with your concerns regarding disinformation promulgated by our foes but feel that you may not fully appreciate the culpability of our own government and institutions in suppressing what is clearly a negative safety signal regarding mRNA vaccine safety. I further agree that each individual must make their own determination on whether the vaccine is appropriate for them – the cost/benefit will vary.
Let us steel ourselves for the battle ahead – there are foes within and without.
Hello Anthony,
Thank you. I appreciate your willingness to find areas that we agree. I acknowledge and agree that the CDC botched the public messaging on COVID, and there were several missteps made that eroded public trust. But I believe that much of the concerns about MRNA vaccine safety have been far overblown, or made up, and I suspect Russia as the source for a lot of it. I don’t trust Dr. Malone, and I think he has overrepresented his credentials on MRNA technology (he claims to have “invented” it. This is a gross overrepresentation of his actual contribution). But alas, I said I didn’t want to get into a debate about it, so I apologize. I will stop now. Thanks again for the expression of common ground.
“To ensure that ineffective, unscientific lockdowns and mandates are never foisted on the American people ever again, I’ve introduced this amendment to eliminate Dr. Anthony Fauci’s position as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and divide his power into three separate new institutes. This will create accountability and oversight into a taxpayer funded position that has largely abused its power, and has been responsible for many failures and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.” –US Senator, Rand Paul, M.D., R-Ky
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/rand-paul-anthony-fauci-covid-mandates/2022/03/14/id/1061042/
Now we will have three Faucis.
Please, no!!!! I liked the sound of “eliminating his position” until I read your comment. LOL
Mr. Nyquist, what do you make of Lindsey Graham’s continued calling for the assassination of Putin? He did it for the third time that I am aware of on Maria Bartiromo this morning. (I read it on Gateway Pundit. Link is in the article.)
I have always regarded Graham as a sellout, effeminate RINO.
But he seems to be sinking to a whole new level of stupidity.
It seems to me, that Marcelo’s opinion yesterday is correct, that certain Western political and business leaders are taking actions and using rhetoric that can be used by Russian government to create/harden the resolve of Russian people as they rebuild the Soviet Empire and beyond.
Knowing that we have an unknown number of Communsist sellouts and useful idiots in many positions of government and business leadership, I myself think that could be the goal, as they work in lockstep with the Communist global movement directed from Moscow or Beijing.
I also wondered if our government truly quit purchasing Russian oil.
On Ivana Stradner’s Twitter page, she shared a report from TankerTrackers.com in the wee hours this morning that two Russian tankers laden with oil cargo had departed Russia bound for the U.S.
Our leaders are so incredibly *PATHETIC!!* it infuriates me sometimes.
P.S. I think Ivana Stradner is pretty good. Seems to have good judgement, and be levelheaded. I don’t think she sees the long picture like you, but what she does see, she sees clearly I believe.
As my regular readers know, I have very harsh words for anyone who talks about assassinating foreign leaders. This is morally reprehensible. What is Lindsay? — a United States Senator or a crime boss?
Sean Hannity agrees with Graham on that point. “Operation Valkyrie” for the Communist set is not a good idea in the least.
The July 44 plot to kill Hitler was a coup attempt by Hitler’s own people.
Emerald Robinson did a very interesting article on Hannity a few weeks ago. It’s on her sub stack page (or account. I just know that it’s called substack).I got a belly full of him when I used to go watch the news with my grandfather. I always got the impression he was a tinhorn.
I should clarify that the latter sentence is my own opinion.
Yessir, I have read your position on this issue, and I agree. You are right. But what I meant, is why would Graham talk such junk openly, on national TV, and post on Twitter? I mean, if he was even going to contemplate calling for it, it seems he would do that behind closed doors. I think he is a dirty rat to put it nicely. He is not remotely helping anything about the situation by popping off like that. And I think he knows that. I think he is trying to fan the flames for some reason.
A lot of my readers agreed with President Trump’s assassination of General Soleimani, even when I did not. Most of my friends agreed with it. Graham is simply expressing what many Americans think is perfectly okay. This shift in our moral thinking is by no means trivial, to be sure, but Graham is not uniquely evil.
@JRNyquist: Even if someone managed to take Putin out, wouldn’t there just be another hardcore Russian Communist to replace him?
Of course, and then we would hear new misleading narratives. Yes.
Iranian is a rouge nation state, and General, Qasem Soleimani, was a soldier; not a head of state. He commands Hezbollah, in Syria, which has launched a great many missiles into Israel and killed a great many Israelis. He had the unmitigated gall to set foot in US occupied Iraq. He was fair game, and asking for it. If there is anything to regret, it’s that in his religion, he died a martyrs’ death. He was probably suffering a terminal illness, and intended to commit suicide by cop.
I am so tired of your propagandized thinking. Soleimani was a general on the way to a negotiation. He was assassinated.
And rouge is a color, by the way.
Jeff, it’s interesting that you side with the UN on this. I can’t find the story of why Soleimani went to Iraq. What please were the negotiations about, and with whom? Are the Russian generals who you say are on the ground in Ukraine, not fair targets?
Also, “Iranian” is the term for the people, not for the country itself.
I believe oil companies had 45 days to adjust for the Russian oil ban. Dockworkers here are saying they will not unload it. It may be sold to another country on it’s way here.
I personally think that the situation is far more complex. Rissia sent mostly tier 3 units, and this is partially the reason the Russians have been slowed down. T-55s and T-64s, and mercenaries from Central Asia. Putin sweeping Ukraine in a week with advanced weapons could and would likely provoke a regional arms buildup and much more attention by the US Navy on Taiwan, as well as NATO being forced to build up themselves, and Poland building their own nuclear weapons. Also, with the West out of Russia, Russia can conduct the purges they want, and prepare their population and industries for war.
From the mouths of babes, in this case BBC in 2017…
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/101/467/397/original/187c447064389e7b.mp4
Isn’t it interesting what you can find when you look back at old news stories? Check this out – John McCain and more:
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/analysis-u-s-cozies-kiev-government-including-far-right-n66061
Interesting that McCain refers to Russia attacking Alaska.
Yes it was. Are those Svoboda members still in the cabinet? (That was 2014 and McCain is standing right next to the leader of Svoboda.) This is also interesting:
“Although much of the more extreme content has now been removed from Svoboda’s leaflets, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Ukraine in 2012 that asked Kiev not to associate with the party on account of its “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views.”
I’m thinking about Putin’s Nazi comments and wondering if they are still there?
Nikki Haley on Dave Rubin’s show. She says: “When an evil dictator, thug, says they’re going to do something, we need to believe them. Putin said he was going to take Ukraine and he is. China said they were going to take Hong Kong and they did. Putin says that he’s next going for Poland and the Baltics, we should believe him. China says they’re going to get Taiwan, that’s going to happen. Iran says they’re going to destroy Israel….”
Jeff and fellow commenters, I just watched a 42 min. documentary produced by Herb Meyer titled The Siege of Western Civilization. It is prophetic. It could have been made this week, but it was produced in 2003. Herbert Meyer served during the Reagan Admin as special asst. to the Director of the CIA. Have any of you ever heard of him?
His name sounds vaguely familiar.
I associated him with National Review in the old days and found an RIP link there, which I posted yesterday. It’s probably hung up because it is a link.
I am very convinced that America and Europe are being led down the path of civil war. The real conflict might begin some time after that takes place.
p.s.
Malachi Martin continues to amaze me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rdzt0AsATLM
Greg, you have a good point. BLM was funded by the Chinese people to cause civil unrest. There are many Chinese nationals living in America, many of who have married locals and infiltrated levels of state and federal govt.
There are 400K Chinese students in additional to those from communist countries, for example: Vietnam studying in American schools. Much of the American population have been compromised, friendly and would rather see America fall and the communists win.
Have we taken into consideration how the youth are used as communist tools?
Possibly. Also, Mexico is now controlled by a far-leftist, Manuel Lopez Obrador, who has not only refused to impose sanctions on Russia, but has also criticized other western nations for their ‘censorship’ of Russia’s state-controlled media. Additionally, the situation with the warring drug cartels is threatening Mexico’s national stability, and I suspect that, more and more, this violence will spill over into the US. Actually, this is already the case in some southern states that share a border with Mexico. These groups could easily be used for political purposes inside of the US by other state actors acting on behalf of nations such as Russia or China.
Mr Nyquist,
The Fifth Service of the Russian FSB’s Colonel-General Sergei Beseda and his Deputy are now under House Arrest. Can we expect that they will now be DISAPPEARED? What do you suspect that their Real Crime was Mr. Nyquist?
“Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent.
“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. He became part of a post-Stalin, short-lived ruling troika until he was executed for treason after Nikita Khrushchev’s coup d’etat in 1953.
Beria targeted “the man” first, then proceeded to find or fabricate a crime. Beria’s modus operandi was to presume the man guilty, and fill in the blanks later.”
By Michael Henry
Mr Nyquist,
Please Peruse this link.
https://cnnbc.com/putin-places-spies-under-house-arrest
Yes. I am told the Ukrainians swindled these guys.
Mr. Nyquist is Putin applying the Dictum of Lavrentiy Beria “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” as regards Colonel-General Sergei Beseda? https://cnnbc.com/putin-places-spies-under-house-arrest
Yes. But their real crime was failure.
Jeff, what are your thoughts on the positive comments coming from the peace talks, and especially Leonid Sultsky, statement that “My personal expectation is that this progress will be strengthened and may lead to a common view, signing of the document, within a few days.”
The oil markets seem to think that most of the fighting will be contained and the war will end soon. Are we in for a surprise?
We could be. One never knows with the Russians.
Have you read this March 12 article delivered to the US-China perception monitor? It seems like a high up piece. To quote, the author ” Hu Wei is the vice-chairman of the Public Policy Research Center of the Counselor’s Office of the State Council, the chairman of Shanghai Public Policy Research Association, the chairman of the Academic Committee of the Chahar Institute, a professor, and a doctoral supervisor.”
My interpretation is that this is a subtle trial balloon that implies one of two outcomes. In the next two weeks, either China decides to destroy the West in the near term, or it explicitly abandons Russia, thus giving China more time. The author advocates for abandoning Russia, but I don’t trust that opinion.
https://uscnpm.org/2022/03/12/hu-wei-russia-ukraine-war-china-choice/
They cannot abandon Russia. That would destroy their position strategically. They need Russia to succeed here.
This author asserts the common assumption that Putin’s objective was to defeat Ukraine with a blitzreig and quickly replace its political leadership. The author believes Russia is unable to support a protracted war, and thus is in the process of failing.
If that were true, why would Putin launch the attack in suboptimal weather conditions, knowing full well the mud would slow things down and complicate any blitzrieg? (Nyquist raises this question in the Gaffney interview) Sure it’s plausible that Putin didn’t accurately assess the relative strengths and attitudes of the Russian and Ukraine armies; but the weather – that was knowable and certainly considered.
I can’t understand why supposedly trained analysts are so quick to assume what the objectives are/were, or that the Ukraine invasion was ever meant to be a discrete “operation.”
Nyquist raises such a simple question – why launch in February – which to really, really think about it, brings only more questions and unsettling inferences.
It seems to me that Putin is happily prolonging the pressure in order to inflict a measure of suffering on the NATO alliance countries that will most certainly result in some sort of protests thus accomplishing much for the communist cause.
A shift in the world…politically, medically, and financially…has occurred. Players have been forced to show their cards so to speak, and it’s looking like the US holds a far weaker hand than I find prudent. The adults appear to have left the table.
The adults are not to be found, yes.
Mr. Nyquist, Why has President Biden directed the Inmates to Run the Asylum as regards to Russia being our Official Interlocutor in he Iran Nuclear talks? What do you see resulting from those Iran Nuclear talks?
https://nypost.com/2022/03/12/biden-is-letting-putin-run-the-iran-nuclear-talks/
Why does President Biden owe is political career to KGB agents and communists? See Armand Hammer. See the Council for a Livable World.
I love how Wikipedia makes Hammer’s communism seem hip and eclectic, like an interest in art:
“Called “Lenin’s chosen capitalist”, he was known as well for his art collection and his close ties to the Soviet Union.”
Jeff, I hate it when you close the comments and go offline for a couple of weeks, especially now in these highly troubled times. I know you’re too busy to write a new article every few days, but what about keeping the comment section open until you’re ready to post again? That way we can all communicate with each other and will have the benefit of your commentary as the world situation develops.
I was the one calling for a two-day-max comment section, but that was months ago when our Russian commie troll was monopolizing the space here. Since that’s no longer happening, could we go back to the old policy of leaving the comments open for a while? I’m sure I’m not the only one who’d like this.
Hello Gretchen. Let’s not forget the Chinese commie trolls in addition to Russian commie trolls.
The Russian attack on Ukraine would not occur without backing from the Chinese. The Chinese like to save face and are planning their own attacks. America is on their radar.
It takes a lot of time to monitor these posts, and the trolls are still here. I literally spent hours each day during the last two weeks deleting posts. It was not necessary this time because the worst of them gave up. They will be back. They always are. I need a break to actually work and finish all this research into what is happening.
You could ask for help. Either volunteers or pay a virtual assistant to do it. Moderators are a very common skillset. Use Upwork or some other freelance site if need be.
No. I am ultimately responsible legally, and from past experience not everyone has the same judgment of sense of fairness.
Thank you for all you do, Jeff!
please Mr. Jeff, don’t let us without your analysis and information in this troubling times, maybe videos on youtube are more expedient way for this
I am posting constantly. Do not worry.
You do this on company time at work in their office, right?
I quit my day job a long time ago. Don’t post here again.
Got it, Jeff. Thanks.
War correspondent, Michael Yon just posted a link to this video from a speech originally dated April 2021 on the likely progression of a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Precient analysis.
https://youtu.be/OutvYSl_TLc
Wow! Those were some harsh assessments and yet many are coming true. I wonder if the end will be as he predicts?
Ill winds blowing from the South. Will We The People protect our land as bravely as the ukrainians when the moment comes?
‘Venezuelan president Maduro voices support for Russian move on Ukraine’
According to a Quinnipiac poll, apparently a lot of us will not. Tellingly, over half of democrats answered that they’d flee instead of fight.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/03/13/poll-almost-half-of-american-say-that-they-would-rather-flee-than-defend-the-united-states/
“…many did say that they would stand and defend the United States from any invader. When asked this question 68 percent of Republicans and 57 percent of Independents say that they would fight. However more than half of Democrats (52%) said they would flee before fighting for their country (Eight percent did not have an answer, a shrug that is equally alarming).”
All those cowards better start packing now because a larger war appears to be coming.
Here is a more detailed analysis of the Poll: https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3838
Mr. Nyquist, do you know the pro-russian journalist Pepe Escobar? Dou you know if heis trustful?
I have never met him.
I have a friend living in Moscow. He is an American and we have been exchanging emails. I thought you all might like to hear his perspective. When I checked in with him this week, I sent him a link to your blog, Jeff. He thanked me and said this is truly a propaganda war. Only time may tell some fragment of truth. Aside from challenges getting money into Russia and concern over availability of imported Rxs, he is fine. In fact, he said Moscow is humming with early spring behavior.
Life goes on.
Thank you for your unselfish sincere service-to God be the glory! May His strength and power continue to sustain, protect and bless you and your family. May His favor, peace, and presence surround you as you courageously and boldly do His work enlightening and encouraging many. You were born for such a time as this…thank you for your obedience. You are such a blessing to many! God Bless you!
Yes!
i’m reminded of early Syrian war reports that kids with their parents filled the local the waterpark to near capacity mere blocks from intense combat. i’ve seen similar reports of revelers fatally celebrating in FL at the center of a hurricane. and recently, similar stories normal activity across most of Ukraine. as jeff says, “life goes on”.
does make you wonder if the Ukranian/Russia crop shortage speculations may be premature. yet, i heard just a couple days ago from some or other youtube channel that Ukrainian farmers do not appear to be prepping to plant, they want to see how this crisis plays out first.
Humanity is certainly interesting. This comment is for the commenters in this thread. Most of you seem to be engaged in good faith; sharing your thoughts and asking questions in the attempt to comprehend better what is going on in your world. And I don’t mean The World, but specifically each and everyone of our individual worlds. Actually grasping the TRUTH of The World is way beyond any of our pay grades.This is, of course, natural and strategically appropriate. But I’m left wondering how many of you are getting yourself positioned for what is now coming at you(us) at speed. Great forces on the move on this planet are interesting, to be sure, but quite dangerous. As I commented recently, most people are addicted to the trees, while the forest is the actual medicine. Minutiae will not save us, nor moral judgements. In fact, the details often lead to one’s destruction as it is difficult to see the club that is about to crush your skull in, when you’re tying your shoe. I find it to be quite healthy to abandon completely the dichotomy of good and evil. There is only good. Some people engage in Very little good. Some engage in Very much good. But it is all good. I first understood this when contemplating light. It is an interesting fact that there is no such thing as darkness. There is light only. One thing, not two. Language often leads to confusion. Darkness is simply an idea, the idea of the lack of light. If you doubt this, try and weigh darkness. Or look at it. Isn’t it interesting that light is required to “see” darkness. In the same way, evil is the lack of good. The Satanic world view is enticing, but ultimately self defeating. How easy is it to play the blame game? A wise man once told me that you only need two animals to describe the human condition; the Sacred Cow, and the Scapegoat. And round and round we go. You know which Jews survived the last round of festivities? The ones who cashed out in the early to mid thirties, took their gold and their children, and got the hell out of the blast zone. Just sayin.
How will Ukrainian farmers be able to export their winter wheat harvest, which was planted last fall? If the war continues into the late spring/early summer, access to the Black Sea ports is questionable due to Russian military activity. The ports in the Baltic States are blocked because Ukraine’s northern borders are with Belarus and Russia. I suppose it could be transported to Poland and then shipped from Polish or German ports, assuming the Russians have not advanced into the western part of Ukraine.
In any case, yields will suffer this year because of inadequate and more expensive supplies of fertilizer. Then there is the issue of the spring planting, which, as pointed out, may be subject to farmers waiting to see how the crisis plays out.
Even if the harvest were to be brought in. Getting it out to the world, at present, is impossible. The Ukrainians are not going to be able to make the spring planting either.
As it stands, there are a number of countries that will suffer for this, and a lot of them are in the middle east and north Africa.
https://rumble.com/embed/vucjwx/?pub=4
I feel like we’re getting so much blatant propaganda from all sides, it’s hard to know what to believe. It’s easy for me to assume the Western media is lying based on the “Russiagate” demonization that occurred during Trump. All the confusion has left me almost seeing this war the same as taking sides if the Bloods and Crips are fighting in the street.
On thing I know for sure is that we don’t want a war with Russia or China. As former Navy, I know some of their anti-ship capabilities, and our defense capabilities. It won’t be pretty.
Correction: It was Frank Meyer who was associated with National Review. The article link I referred to happened to by National Review by coincidence.
JEFF. WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THIS REPORT??
Russian TV Sets Stage for FURTHER INVASIONS!!! Poland, Baltics!!!
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/russian-tv-sets-stage-for-further-invasions-poland-baltics
This is an important bit of information warfare coming out of Russia. It is not entirely new, but follows a line of argument that has been presented in the Russian state controlled media for a long time; namely, that NATO wants to destroy Russia. Although the West is evolving toward its own form of toxic state socialism, we are not as yet at the dark stage that Russia is, with highly centralized militaristic Caesarism. With a complex, defensive, consensus-governed organization like NATO, you cannot have grandiose Caesarist plans of aggression. NATO’s wicked side comes from its self-righteous democratic emotionalism, a group-hysteria that emerges within the leaders, as happened over Kosovo in 1999 and is emerging now. Here is the possible origins of a strategic mistake tending toward world nuclear war. Moscow is committed to putting the USSR back together. This is what Putin said, and the Russian TV is saying it. COLLISION COURSE.
Ukraine is not Kosovo, aside from the oil. They still haven’t managed to get that pipeline through there.
It’s not clear how many war ships are US, but this is a nice gift to Putin. With so many fewer US Navy ships left afloat, China can take the South Pacific with impunity. Biden has said more than a few times he’s not going to be engaged in WW3. Thing is, Russia demolished the NATO club house in Ukraine, where NATO supposedly isn’t a member, and where US bioweapons labs are no big deal, but being disavowed by the US, anyway.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/4890360/nato-masses-troops-warships-war-games-border/
Is there someway some of these trolls and senseless posters can be blocked? It’s enough to keep track of what’s really going on well muddling through posts that are truly clueless.
It’s getting even crazier!
Putin signs law to seize foreign aircraft as sanctions impact Russian aviation
https://www.foxnews.com/us/putin-aircraft-sanctions-russian-aviation
Here’s an excellent series of posts that offers an insightful explanation of how Putin’s kleptocratic Russia evolved and what makes it tick, by Kamil Galeev: https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/status/1503507960181448705
She has other posts as well about the communist domination of Russia’s surviving political parties.
Jeff
It sounds like Putin is poised to take Poland and the Baltics after Ukraine.
Is there some point at which the USA should get involved in Europe ?
The Russians [oops!], I mean the Ukrainians, are having such a hard time we should help them as much as possible — avoiding a direct war. Brinksmanship is not for stupid people. But war may be inevitable now.
Jeff, don’t you mean “the Ukranians are having such a hard time”?
The answer as to why the Russians attacked in the bad weather is coming into focus now. It appears the Ukrainians fed false information of to the Russians. This is why certain Russian generals and intelligence officials are either fired or under arrest. It is unclear what trick was played, but the Russians were misled in some way. The Ukrainians also had the concept of holding back their reserves, making it look like they would collapse quickly. It was very clever because nobody really thought Ukraine could have such a strong military position after almost three weeks. The Russians took the bait and attacked under soft ground conditions, perhaps even expecting that some Ukrainians would switch sides. Whatever the real losses, many Russian attacks have been repulsed. Many Russian tanks and vehicles have been destroyed. I would expect the Ukrainian losses are also pretty heavy. Even more troubling for the Russians, however, the Ukrainian intelligence services apparently penetrated the Russian military and special services. This has to send a cold chill up Putin’s spine. The arrests at the top of the intelligence service and the sacking of generals clearly indicate the seriousness of the problem. Also, China might well have been planning to blockade Taiwan this month, as we saw the activity in the Chinese Naval bases ramp up at the outset of the Russian invasion. But when the Russians were stalled in their attack, the Chinese backed off. China has cold feet and does not want to act under the present circumstances. We are not hearing anything more about the planned Chinese naval exercises. In forming their defense plan, the Ukrainian must have bargained on two things: (1) NATO would help them; (2) Putin’s regime would be shaken to its core. This gamble may not work, for NATO has not giving sufficient help even as Putin’s regime is not collapsing. Of course, it is tragic to see the Russians bombarding Ukraine’s cities into rubble as the Ukrainians refuse to give in. Of course the Russians continue to flank the Ukrainian positions little by little. Ukraine is losing, inch by inch. Even so, this is a battle of willpower, a battle of information and a battle of attrition. It is war at its most terrible. To be sure, Ukraine does not have sufficient forces to hold under dry ground conditions, which will come in May or June. Unless NATO intervenes or Putin falls, Ukraine will be defeated when the ground is baked hard by the sun. In fact, the Ukrainian situation could worsen next week as Kiev is turned to rubble and Ukraine begins suffering heavy casualties in the fighting. So, yes, the Ukrainians are having a hard time in the sense that their people are dying and suffering. The Russian leaders are having a hard time in that all their plans, and their self-confidence has been shaken. The West has been lucky in all this; for imagine what would have happened had Russia taken Ukraine easily. Imagine the confidence the Russian Army would now feel. All those Russian forces would be sitting on NATO’s frontier. What should we do about this? Do we let the Ukrainians die fighting? What happens then? Moscow has its eyes on the Baltic States and Moldova. Do you think NATO can stand by and watch the Ukrainian people slaughtered without intervening? Is that morally and politically right? It is even strategically expedient? Would we begin to feel ashamed for our inaction? As we watch this tragedy unfold, every human being in Europe and North America is confronted with a spectacle of horror. We are watching brave people fighting the troops of Vladimir Putin, whose ultimate objective is to defeat America together with China. (Of course, almost everyone would disagree with this proposition, but I believe it to be true.) So the question remains: Do we stand by, watching and cringing from the sidelines knowing that Moscow would like to knock down our cities? Why do is he even doing this to Ukraine? It is so insane, so unnecessary — unless Ukraine is a stepping stone to greater things, greater acts of destruction.
I think Putin wants to pick up a fight with NATo from the get go. Ukraine is such an obvious provocation, much like a cop beating senselessly a kid to unmask a relation between that kid and some mafia don. Basically, his goal is to make NATO look the aggressor and nuke the sht out of us with the approval of the world. Ukraine is as much a fishing expedition as it is a way to flex some Soviet muscles, truing to rally communist Ukrainians by flying the Soviet flag on the tanks there.
It is unlikely he wanted to stumble so badly in Ukraine.
What do you feel Alex Jones has right and what does he have wrong in the first 8.5 minute analysis that Putin fell for a trap from the globalists?
https://www.infowars.com/posts/exclusive-analysis-nato-laid-a-trap-for-putin-that-could-destroy-the-world/
Jones does not understand Russia, the West or modern history.
I used to be a big Alex Jones fan. In fact it’s because of him that I found Mr. Nyquist. However, this war has really exposed him.
First, remember his Joe Rogan interview where he called himself “kinda retarded.” He reminds us that he has major weaknesses. Namely that his ability to analyze and see through Russian disinformation is largely non-existent. He only sees through some western and Chinese disinformation because of sheer will. And he’s surrounded by people who are even more susceptible to disinformation, or are known agents of disinformation. If you read Russian and Chinese propaganda often, you’ll realize that he just parrots the stuff back.
For example the NATO trap was a bit of Russian propaganda that went around accusing NATO of trapping Russia to weaken it against China. Even though of course Russia and China are on the same side.
Very perceptive, Urgle. You got Jones’s number.
Here’s a more detailed analysis of that Poll: https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3838
I don’t know why WordPress dropped my comment to the bottom. I had intended to reply to the posting about the Quinnipiac Poll up above.
I think there is a limit on each thread to the number of responses.
So, the communist party of Russia “opposing” Putin made astonishing gains of 34% vote, and they apparently are the ones who wrote/asked (told?) Putin to free the Donbas region, but not just the Russian ethnic dominated part, but the whole thing including Ukrainians, and, that is, about 2 to three time the territory. Obviously it was a strategic (getting water ways) and politically strategic empire move. Now we see tanks openly displaying the hammer and sickle, no doubt to rally communist Ukrainians ro the “Russia invasion. It seems the Soviet communist mask of Putin has fallen but no one is paying attention. Interestingly Putin only gave the communists 25% of the seats, but the communists did not protest (I assume it was meant for western consumption, but it is funny that to our State Department, there never is anything for external consumption but saber rattling is always for the internal consumption…).
Because, at first, I was telling Ukrainians to tone down the nationalist angle and let Russians in Ukraine become better adult Russians in Ukraine than they are in Russia itself – in good Tsarist like empire mindedness (the Tsarina indeed invited Germans to do just that in the Volga river region so as to modernize Russia, and they had been given autonomy, and a sort of colonial autonomy they lost under Lenin and Stalin, shipped to Kazakstan… for who needs nationalistic equality in love for country paranoia when you got communistic equalitarian paranoia). However I had no idea that Russia was actually making an impossible and fascist demand , which was to let a precedent of Russian troops to subjugate genuine Ukrainian territorial area that did not have any significant Russian ethnic presence there. In that respect, it was the Russians in the Donbas region who actually had the sinister envy and genocide intent against Ukrainians – to eventually ship them to Kazakstan the same, perhaps. The Russians plaid a Nationalist card but then moved to an imperial card quite quickly, and now they are in full blown Soviet post empire mode, touting Soviet Union flag on their tanks.
This is called “putting back the Soviet Union” at all costs.