We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Willi Münzenberg
The West is infested by monstrous vermin, and we can smell their ambient filth. In J. Michael Waller’s book, Big Intel, we are shown the Soviet origins of this infestation. Waller tells the story of a Kremlin operation to “make Western civilization stink.” The operation was approved by Vladimir Lenin through his representative, Felix Dzerzhinsky, in 1922.
Before continuing with a brief review of Waller’s book, it is worth mentioning that last Sunday was the hundredth anniversary of Lenin’s death. The Soviet leader’s corpse remains on display in Moscow at a mausoleum of marble, porphyry, and granite. It has never been explained why Russia continues to preserve Lenin’s mummified corpse as if it were a holy relic. Perhaps Vladimir Putin, despite his criticisms of Lenin, has slyly upheld Lenin’s legacy. The Guardian’s Moscow correspondent, Andrew Roth, wrote that Vladimir Putin is one of Vladimir Lenin’s “most strident critics … who appears far more enamoured with the empire that Lenin’s revolutionaries overthrew.”[i] Yet Roth is naïve; and contrary to Masha Gessen’s assertion that Putin is The Man Without a Face, it is easily shown that Putin has always had two faces; and like Janus, his two faces point in two directions as he presides over an equivocal period in Russian history.
That being the case, if Putin dislikes Lenin as Roth claims, then why has he not buried Lenin? “I believe we should be very careful here,” said Putin in 2016, “so as not to take any steps that would divide our society. We need to unite it.” Yet, if Russia is made out of opposing elements – communist and nationalist – how can the country be unified? Either one belief or the other must prevail. In this regard, Putin cannot serve two masters. Yet, there was a political genius who offered a solution. His name was Joseph Stalin, and he turned the two faces metaphor into something more kinetic. Stalin said that a successful leader must learn to ride a horse in two directions at once. In the present situation the two directions are: (1) Russian nationalism mixed with Orthodox Christianity, and (2) Lenin’s socialist camp (i.e., Cuba, China, North Korea, Nicaragua, Venezuela, South Africa, Vietnam, etc.).
Anyone with eyes can see that Putin is riding his Russian horse in both of these directions. Even as his armies advance into Ukraine under Russian banners, his henchmen erect statues of Lenin in the conquered territories. Over a year ago, a Guardian headline proclaimed, “Back in the USSR: Lenin statues and Soviet flags reappear in Russian-controlled cities.”[ii]
Why hasn’t the mainstream press caught onto Putin’s double trajectory? Our leaders ignore Putin’s assistance to the Leninist countries. They focus on his so-called “Russian imperialism.” Why? Because Russian agents of influence have spent decades framing important subjects so that everyone puts the facts together incorrectly. They do not see Putin’s two faces. They do not see him riding in two directions. They see only one face. They see only one direction.
To what extent have our minds been conditioned by the communists? For example, if I use the term “military industrial complex” you immediately think of sinister Pentagon generals and defense contractors. If I refer to capitalism you immediately think of greed and excess. If I use the name Lee Harvey Oswald, you immediately think “patsy.” If I use the term “communist subversion” you immediately think of the mocking phrase “reds under the bed.” If I refer to Senator Joseph McCarthy you immediatley think of a demagogue falsely accusing innocent people.
I observe these associations creeping into my own thoughts, even as I resist them. How could they not be imbedded in the thinking of Americans everywhere? Related to this, in Michael Waller’s book Big Intel, we find reference to something called Critical Theory, which comes from the Frankfurt School. It is, noted Waller, a form of information warfare known as “cultural Marxism.” It involves “logical trains of thought that would lead people to accept and pursue cultural Marxist conclusions….”[iii] More precisely: “As opposed to the later Marx, the cultural Marxist … would tear apart societies not by economic class … but by [tearing apart] religion, law, race, family, tradition, knowledge, patriotism, and beliefs.”[iv] He added, “Critical theory would be kneaded, reinvented, and refined over the decades, with help from the Marxist psychosexual interpretations of the psychologist Sigmund Freud, to apply to sexuality, gender, race, ethnicity, and beyond.”[v]
How exactly can Critical Theory be traced back to Vladimir Lenin in Moscow? Waller points to a meeting in Moscow, in 1922, “In the squat, boxy, four-story headquarters of the new Marx-Engels Institute….” Here we find a curious gathering of misfits: (1) Karl Radek, of the Soviet Politburo; (2) George Lukács, one-time education commissar in Béla Kun’s Hungarian communist regime; (2) Willi Münzenberg, primary organizer of communist front groups around the world; and Lenin’s representative in the group, Felix Dzerzhinsky, founder of the Soviet secret police (a.k.a., Cheka/GPU/NKVD/KGB).[vi]
At this time, noted Waller, “Dzerzhinsky was running Operation Trust, a spectacular five-year deception plot to attract anti-Bolshevik forces from exile, fund them and arm them, build up their leaders, and do everything necessary to recruit and mobilize supporters across the old Russian Empire….” Even if the Bolsheviks had to kill some of their own, they would create a false opposition movement which their enemies could join. In the end Dzerzhinsky’s agents would shepherd these enemies of communism into a trap by which all could be identified and liquidated.[vii]
Of Dzerzhinsky’s many projects, the 1922 meeting with Radek, Lukács, and Münzenberg would light the fuse on a world-wide campaign of ruthless criticism. The idea was to build a mechanism that would criticize “every aspect of Western civilization to tear it down from within.” And Frankfurt Germany would be ground zero for this project, which ultimately resulted in the Frankfurt School.[viii]
By polluting the well of common ideas, by contaminating Western intellectuals with filth and self-disgust, Lenin’s colleagues hoped to turn the West into a sewer and its elite into monstrous vermin. The plan was to normalize perversion: from the Freudian obsession with sex to the sexual revolution, from the sexual revolution to the disintegration of the family, from the disintegration of the family to hormone-blockers for children and the mutilation of children in the mockery of turning boys into girls and girls into boys. Here was the inception of the Snowflake personality – now juxtaposed with Nietzsche’s Last Man as Last Snowflake.[ix]
From Frankfurt to New York, the infestation spread. It spread from schools into government offices. It spread to the Pentagon, the FBI, and CIA. Finally, like Gregor Samsa in Kafka’s 1915 novella, The Metamorphosis, the chiefs of American intelligence awoke to find themselves inexplicably transformed into vermin.
How did the rank and file of the FBI and CIA react? According to Waller,
It goes like this: The good professionals inside the bureaucracy become demoralized. Some of the best younger ones will quit early, others will keep their heads down and try to ride it out, more will go along to get along but without much enthusiasm, and those further along in their careers, eyeing retirement, will dejectedly do their jobs until they can end their careers with full benefits.[x]
The impact on America’s national security? Paralysis, collapse, and corruption. The new intelligence “professional” is a lobotomized drone. Some will not believe this is true; but when I got my teaching credential back in 1986, both my master teachers told me that my career depended on studying Marx.
And now we have the nucleus of a Soviet elite in Washington, D.C. This elite controls the federal government’s intelligence and police. Even if we removed all Marxists from the federal bureaucracy tomorrow, our school systems are producing a steady stream of lobotomized drones.
How do we stop this enormous, well-funded machinery from transforming the United States into a communist hive?
Audio Interview With Michael Waller
Here is my audio interview with J. Michael Waller, author of Big Intel, discussing the situation and possible solutions:
Audio Interview with Jimmy
Here is my discussion with Jimmy from Brooklyn on Lenin’s Party of a New Type.
Links and Notes
[i] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/21/angel-or-antichrist-russia-grapples-with-lenins-legacy-100-years-after-death
[ii] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/23/back-in-the-ussr-lenin-statues-and-soviet-flags-reappear-in-russian-controlled-cities
[iii] J. Michael Waller, Big Intel: How the CIA and FBI Went from Cold War Heroes to Deep State Villains (Kindle), p.63.
[iv] Ibid.
[v] Ibid, p. 64.
[vii] Ibid, p. 71.
[viii] Ibid, p. 73.
[ix] Snowflake: An entitled, narcissistically “special” person who is easily offended.
[x] Waller, pp. 200-201.
Friends and Enemies
Quarterly Subscription (to support the site)
JRNyquist.blog
$15.00
112 responses to “Making the West Stink: Interview With J. Michael Waller on Big Intel”
On a recent Ann Coulter column, Ms. Coulter wrote about Nikki Haley:
‘She seems to have kicked herself in the head one too many times with those heels. Here’s Haley’s explanation of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel, delivered at a CNN townhall on Jan. 4, 2024:
“I told you about that brutality on Oct. 7 in Israel. Right? Oct. 7 is Putin’s birthday. Who is the happiest man in the world right now? Putin.”
This is the pinhead the donors are trying to foist on us, showering Haley with campaign donations to keep her in the race against Trump. It’s like choosing between water torture and the rack. Either way, Democrats got the Republican nominee they wanted.’
The premise of this reasoning by Coulter is that Iran’s well-known dealings and connection to the October 7th event in Israel are 1) obviously unconnected to the Ukraine War; 2) even if it were connected, it would be absurd for Iran to use a subliminal and significant gesture in the way it engages in connection to the War in Ukraine to cozy up to Russia as an ally.
A few days after the war in Ukraine began, an Iranian-origin missile was intercepted in the United Arab Emirates, Iran’s rivals. Some commentators on Fox News interpreted this as a discreet gesture of cooperative engagement by Iran (or a friendly confirmation of cooperative engagement by Iran) towards Russia. This seems to suggest that Russia and China are using Iran as a foothold in the Middle East, preventing, for example, Israel from providing concentrated assistance to the United States when it needs to take care of itself.
One can’t tell anymore whether political pundits like Ann Coulter are bluffing or telling the truth, being so desirous to believe what they’re saying as to be convinced by it.
It reminds me of one of Robert Greene’s 48 Laws of Power, Law 32: “The truth is often avoided because it is ugly and unpleasant.”
“Never appeal to truth and reality unless you are prepared for the anger that comes with the end of an enchantment. Life is so harsh and stressful that people who can manufacture romance or conjure up a fantasy are like oases in the desert: everyone heads toward them. There is great power in understanding and expressing the fantasies of the masses.
“The citizens of Venice had prosperity for so long that, upon losing their importance with the Atlantic sea routes, the senators of the city were deceived by a swindler who promised gold through alchemical substance in exchange for gold and wealth.”
Whether or not inadvertent gatekeeping prevents people from understanding the Communist alliance, it has an effect that lacks that “almost cute” factor of other, more straightforward gatekeepers. With these conservative influencers one senses there is something going on underlyingly, whatever it may be, that isn’t comedic in tone; it is plain tragic. Communist deception has a way of somewhat discretely violating people’s dignity that leaves a disturbing, if subtle, taste in the back of an observer’s mind.
In the case of untruthfulness, there is nothing more culpable than self-deception. Every deceiver needs a partner in the one who is deceived. But now it is such a deadly game, one wonders whether the West will survive at all.
Alas, many so-called conservative sites claim to be conservative, but do not engage in a shred of critical thinking. Examples are The Gateway Pundit, Unz Review (publishes may who are openly leftist), Gates of Vienna, Burning Platform, and numerous others.
Given what is going on in Russia and China, it is no wonder Larry Johnson’s head exploded when you argued with him. So many idiots thinking they are conservatives and know what is going on. It’s pathetic. They have been taken in by the communists.
It seems so. They are easily played for fools.
Of interest: https://pjmedia.com/raymond-ibrahim/2024/01/25/europeans-will-succumb-to-islam-says-former-intelligence-chief-n4925852
Ibrahim is a great writer–always fascinating, often giving an absorbing history lesson in his articles. Not so much here, and this is not one of his better articles, but it’s still worth reading–makes a vital point.
Is Ibrahim a Muslim?
Ibrahim is a Christian.
Yes, he is a Christian, specifically Coptic, I believe, and of Egyptian extraction.
I have been hoping to talk with Maassen, who apparently knows Golitsyn’s writings.
Do you mean Hans Georg Maassen? He is definitley interesting, anyway it’s strange that he wants an alliance with the AFD
That is strange, indeed. Doesn’t he think Russia is dangerous?
Having followed some of the interviews with Mr. Maaßen and reflected on his position, I would not say that he wants an alliance with the AFD. What he says is that he does not reject the idea of forming alliances if favourable oppurtinies arise to work with the AFD on specific issues or in specific political constellations (of which there are a grest number of possible variances on communal, state and federation level).
This is contrary to the position of the established parties holding power in Germany who categorically defy any notion of accepting the AFD as a legitimate political entity based on the same principals they claim to derive their right to rule from.
To me the impression is convincing that Mr. Maaßen is arguing and searching a way to implement workable balances of political power that aim to benefit the German population (the German term Realpolitik comes to mind, where ideological differences become secondary in view of the issues that have to be solved and the question who has virtues and relevant expierence to contribute substantially is more pressing).
Regarding Russia I think to remember that he is clear about Putins Russia being a tyranny. Yet he seems to be reluctant about German contribution to war efforts, as which he sees the support of the Ukrainian self dense with weapons. The German constitution / Grundgesetz mandates German policy makers to contribute to peace in the world and not to engage in military conflicts. Maybe he has not drawn the conclusion that helping Ukrainians to defend themselves is actually contributing to peace and stability – but this is just me speculating.
What he is very clear and outspoken about, is that the radical left especially the Antifa engage in illegal terroristic activities against the state and the population and that their actions are shielded from comming to justice by leftists in political, admistrative and journalistic power.
In light of this I would say one could interpret his position of possible corporation with the AFD as part of searching a healthier equilibrium in German politics in a situation where radical leftism has creeped in and established itself as an accepted position.
One could assume it might make sense to work with people who reject the Lenin-Marxist trajectory out of insight or gut feeling, disregarding the party affiliation they have subscribed to, to achive a less toxic environment. Considering honesty and moral values of individual participants seems urgent as the defense lines against the madness of the Sovjets and their victims are getting thinner and thinner.
I very much hope to interview Maaßen along with Alex at some time in the near future. Perhaps his positions will come into focus. Perhaps his strategy is to win over the AFD voters — not to antagonize them, but bring them along.
The description of Maassen’s views above is interesting, and maybe an even viable political approach for moderate right-wing parties. That is, parties opposed to the extreme Left could find some way to work together with extreme Right parties like the AfD to solve the problems caused by entrenched leftist policies, without necessarily subscribing to the latter’s dangerous views on foreign policy. That could be a way to entice away AfD moderates who oppose Communism first and only view Russia as an ally second. The main danger I see with this is if centrist parties compromise on national security in order to secure the AfD’s support for implementing other policies that are deemed more important. This kind of negotiation will clarify to what extent parties like the AfD and their supporters are genuinely anti-Communist rather than tools of Russia. If the AfD prioritizes things that benefit Russia over other needed reforms in Germany, and if the centrists go along with this, this would be very bad. Essentially the centrists would be allowing themselves to be persuaded that Russia is not an immediate threat, which is the same thing we see from the Western establishment today. Some problems might indeed be fixed and some extreme leftist policies reversed, which will make a lot of people happy. But without the political will to identify and expel Russian and Chinese influence, the communists will just find new ways of sabotaging and dividing a country. And all of this with Russia being on the border of NATO, if Ukraine falls due to lack of Western support.
The characterisation of the AFD as being on the extreme right is a result of ideological framing. They have (had) some people among them that were chased by the media circus through town. Yet, which larger group has not border cases among its members? If one looks at the parties policy manifesto, which they have clearly formulated and published (something the parties in political power have not done) it is not possible to give this characterization substance. (Link: https://www.afd.de/grundsatzprogramm/)
They state that their main focus is the wellbeing of the German population. In the leftist framework this classifies them without further ado as right wing. Because the population in question is German the adjective “extreme” becomes applicable for the demagoges of the left and their following.
If we consider the problem as a real, not an ideological, one the wellbeing of peoples can only be achieved by handling the issues that life brings individually. And to such a handling ideology can contribute nothing. Methodology is needed to tackle social, economic and cultural challenges. Not a general (political) one, but one that is adequate to each problem at hand. Hence the need for people with different backgrounds coming together and search for solutions.
The AFD is much more an association on such a basis then an ideological formation.
Of course, they came together also as an response to wild socialist utopias driving the powers to be. From this angle one could label them as being on the right side of the political spectrum, but such classifications are very limited for representing reality.
In regard of their position towards Sovjet-Russian agression which could be said to be in principal pacifistic (no interference in foreign conflicts) it should be considered that this can be viewed as a form of self restraint and self defense in counting on the better part of human nature that is inherently peacefull, in search for harmony and balance with its surroundings.
Also for Germany and Europe the relation to Russia is a question of deep and historic cultural, economic, religious bonds that defy an abstract classifications into good versus bad.
None the less the AFD state that they want to make the German military fit for defending the country (structural renewal, mandatory subscription). This points to an awarness of external threads. In as far the Communist-Sovjet power with their long range strategies raging in Russia and beyond is considered in their strategical contemplation to be such a thread I can not tell, only guess that also in the AFD have to be people present that can put one and one together outside idelogical boundraries.
At the very least they say to hold up basic moral values (integrity of family life, education free of ideology, economic freedom and reason, no gender- or sexualism, the right own arms) that go against the socialist destructivism.
What is the relationship of the AfD to National Socialism? The left is no doubt making a connection — right?
Yes, you are extremely right that the left wants to make this connection.
The public argumentation, or rather the constant gasping and yelling to be more precise, goes in abbreviation to its principle along these lines:
The AFD is against open borders and unlimited immigration. This means they are against foreigners. The national socialists also had antipathies against foreigners. Therefor it is obvious and undoubtedly proven that the AFD is national socialist.
Such a simplistic thing is the propaganda that is force fed into the public mind drawing on decade long efforts to convince German self-awareness of collective guilt and an inherent pathological tendency to commit crimes against humanity.
Noteworthy seems to be that judicial discourse and practice in Germany is not entirely swept away by the left leaning opinions and talking points that spin through public discourse.
A ruling of the constitutional court this month has suspended public financing for the party “Die Heimat” on grounds that it leans toward national socialism in its positions. Until recently this party called itself National Democratic Party (NPD) and has as one of its policies to ensure an ethnic homogenous population by non-violent means (the AFD voices no eugenistic opinion of any kind). For years there have been unsuccessful efforts to ban and dissolve this party with legal proceedings. Only when the leftist ruling class issued a law tailored for this case the above mentioned ruling has become possible.
After the ruling politicians and media people were heard demanding that it is now high time to get such a ruling going against the AFD. Yet the legal practitioners are shaking their heads: There is no chance that the AFD could be declared to be unconstitutional. The party plays by the rules lied out by the Grundgesetz.
This party simply is not racist, antisemitic or national socialist. If somebody in the party voices opinions that violate the strict German anti racism laws, they are expelled.
The whole narrative of the AFD being decidedly right wing or even the (potential) successor of the NSDAP is a fabrication. It gains traction because mostly left-leaning politicians and media figures use it to distract from their utter incompetence in policy making, economy, social sciences, basic logical thinking etc.
In a cool headed, non-ideological discussion it might be possible to address the AFD as being geared towards preservation of German national and cultural values as well as social justice. But one would have to be able to describe unlimited immigration as social injustice and the significance of German culture for the world without hearing the clinking of handcuffs on the other side of the table.
Germany has been subjected to a mad policy of systematic genocide. This is not an elimination of the Germans by gas chambers or mass slaughter, but by the elimination of Germans as an ethnicity, by the use of German history for destructive shaming, by the importation of Arabs, Turks, and Africans — by the sinister mixing of Muslims with Christians — thereby diluting and eventually eliminating everything distinctively German. This mixing guarantees future civil wars and ethnic strife in the heart of Europe. The process could not have originated in any well-wishing. Only an enemy would advance such a destructive policy as forcibly settling millions of Asians and Africans in Germany. This is akin to placing two or more scorpions in a bottle. One cannot make a country, or keep a country, under such conditions. One simply breaks it down, destroys it, and tramples it underfoot. Look at the Soviet Union and its integration of Muslims and Christians, Asians and Europeans. This suited Moscow’s dictatorship, for all these diverse groups require a strong hand. Soon Europe will need an outside force to maintain order. And this outside force can solidify control over the One Common European Home. It is the kind of polity Moscow knows how to govern. Isn’t it obvious who benefits from this policy of opening Germany to Muslim immigration? It is Russian that wins. It is the Kremlin that set up this game.
… and to attempt to give some answer to your question:
I have heard speaches of AFD exponents before the German Bundestag where they utterly condemn the notion of sending German military equipment to Ukraine asking rethorically who the last German government was that sent tanks eastwards.
My impression is that they do not want have any positive relation to the practices and policies of national socialists.
Maybe the view is prevelant to see the national socialist dictatorship as what it was – a caricature, an abdomination, a tragic failure of true German spirit.
Roman: What we see in the AfD is the success of Russian influence agents. German patriotism, at this juncture, must not fall into the trap of embracing a pro-Russian right out of hatred for the left. This is a false either/or. Russia is the silent partner of the left. Any attempt to romance the right by Moscow is a a game of entrapment.
This is a good opportunity to learn from history. As we know, Soviets are great admirers of Chinese tacticians. I purposely call Soviets not Russians because the USSR never died as it was a scam. I suggest everyone should stop calling Russia or Russians but Soviets to perpetuate the only truth of USSR fake collapse.
Goujian, King of Yue, was literally surrendering his entire nation in the Spring and Autumn Period. His surrender prevented his nation from complete destruction by state of Wu but suffering as a slave under Wu’s King. The King of Wu treated Goujian as his personal slave to humiliate Goujian at any circumstance. However, Goujian was secretly building his forces in the state of Yue, waged acts of sabotage economicaly within state of Wu, and demoralized the military of Wu. When the times suddenly came after all capable elites of Wu died or retired, Goujian suddenly launched a massive attack to conquer state of Wu which forced king of Wu to commit suicide. Goujian was probably the only known, first person in history to wage a long term deception strategy on an international level to win. His victory over Wu later allowed him to become the most powerful King in the entire China at that time, before the rise of Qin dynasty.
This story served a powerful, historical reminder on how the Soviets were inspired by Chinese history and tactics. In fact, China also used a similar tactic under Deng Xiaoping to become wealthy and powerful. In economic, China has become powerful enough to destroy the West. In EV, Elon Musk even sounded the warning that Chinese companies will crush all Western automakers if there is no trade barrier.
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-ceo-musk-chinese-ev-firms-will-demolish-rivals-without-trade-barriers-2024-01-25/
I fear that the time for the communists to stage the final phase of their long deception strategy is coming soon.
Chinese history is full of these deception stories. There is always a great “sage” using the truth to deceive. (The greatest deception of all is to use the truth to hoodwink others.)
That is Marxism and its variants like Leninism or Stalinism became successful in China and other parts of Asia because deception was the hallmark of their cultures. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels pioneered the arts of deception into a form of science, and it was Lenin perfected it.
China loved Marxism because it validates their history into a global science as a mean to rule the world!
I think that it is not that difficult to grasp the very nature of the struggle between GOOD and EVIL, I, for example understand this as an eternal war between a HUMANS OF SMART AND HONSET WORK and a PARASITES.
A few years ago I watched three or four episodes of a TV serial titled, if I remember well, “One Thousand Dumb Ways to Die”. The serial was depicting cases of death caused by the irresponsible, self destructive and reckless conduct of various individuals.
One of the episodes was about a young, obese woman who wanted desperately to slim down but lacked resolve, discipline and general any sense of individual responsibility to take a grip of herself and change.
She has learned about an odious trend along which the people, just like her who, in order to slim down, were infecting themselves with a tapeworm.
She decided to follow their example and also infected herself with a tapeworm.
At the beginning she was elated because she, indeed, began to slim down while she still could keep binging on food to satisfy her overblown stomach.
What she failed to notice was that the tapeworm war growing inside her until it filled her entire digestive system. She was also becoming sicker and weaker with passing weeks.
One day, she suffered a massive internal bleeding and poisoning and died violent, painful death.
The doctor has explained that towards the end of its life cycle tapeworm produces, genderlessly, new offspring which, in search of the new living space, punches through the walls of intestines causing massive bleeding and poisoning.
I refer to that episode because it perfectly illustrates the self destructive process our Western, Christianity based civilization has subjected itself to.
Many years ago and it was a long, complex and multi staged process, we began allowing human PARASITES to participate in a democratic process and in elections in particular.
The key opening the gate for the PARASITIC sewer to enter our collective democratic existence is ABSURDITY of the so called “universal voting rights” which allows the above mentioned PARASITES, various anti social elements and even criminals to vote and make possible for the PARASITO-FASCIST BEAST to take over the government and legislative body.
As soon PARASITES take over, they begin immediately to steal as much as it is physically possible and corrupt the law so they will NEVER be held accountable for the crimes they commit and where it is possible to make their hold on power permanent.
This process should be perceived with an absolute clarity by anyone with, at least, two functioning grey cells.
In order to live its PARASITIC life, a PARASITE has to produce some kind of argument, some sort of quasi intellectual operator to justify its PARSITIC existence, to convince others that the service it’s providing for the so called “society” is useful, humane, noble, creative or whatever we can think of.
PARASITE has also lie to itself to build the internal motivational system that would power the PARASITE’s eternal fight for its PARSITIC life style.
Thus, throughout centuries and even millennials, PARASITE has managed to build an ideology or rather ideologies of PARASITISM.
We have two major PARSITIC ideologies; one is Marxism/ Leninism/ Communism with their derivatives and the other is Islam. Both envisage and allow for the enslavement, rape and even the murder of their eternal enemy which is a HUMAN OF SMART AND HONSET WORK and the plunder of his wealth.
However, while Marxism can be regarded as an anti spiritual ideology of PARASITISM, Islam is a quasi spiritual ideology of PARASITISM.
The very PARASITIC character of both those ideologies explains perfectly why the communists and Moslems ally themselves with each other so easily and willingly and support each other in their war against our Christianity based civilization.
They are also purely FASCIST in their way of holding the power once they win it.
Unfortunately for us, PARASITIC life forms and that includes PARSITIC “humans” are as old as the life itself, hence their endurance and also their attractiveness to the less developed human beings who fear and hate the spontaneity of freedom, democracy, market economy and, in general, the life where one has to take a full responsibility for every aspect of his or her life.
There is a fantastic article written by Darren Jonescu in 2009 titled “Parasitocracy” when Obama took over his ill gotten “Presidency”. In this article Darren explains almost everything.
It is my personal belief that if we begin to use more precise terminology to describe our mortal enemy which is a PARASITE and regard its ideologies, with all their artificial complexity, as a secondary issue, we could start dreaming about taking over the narrative.
Regards – Bogdan
P.S: On a bit lighter note; It is not easy for me to write such a long diatribe as my English is entirely self taught. I began learning English when I was already thirty four and knew that I would be emigrating to Australia. At such age it is, perhaps, ten times more difficult to learn foreign language than when you are a kid. My daughter, for example, spoke perfect English after barely five months. I’m writing that to apologize for my linguistic imperfections.
Interesting post, Bogdan. The parasite analogy is a pretty good one. The Italian sociologist, Vilfredo Pareto, wrote about Lions and Foxes in the ruling elite. He said the Foxes ultimately predominate within the elites and lack the strength of the lions. Foxes want to negotiate everything, but their weakness leads to a general plundering as they cannot fight off the wolves. Pareto said this was cyclical and resulted in long periods of spoliation. Society cannot recover until the lions emerge once more to drive the wolves away.
Thank you, Jeff, I wrote this lengthy (and a bit clumsy) post to put as strong as possible emphasis on the strategic importance of applying the term PARASITE in our attempt to build our argument against the ideological onslaught by the alliance of communists and Islamists.
During the ascendancy of Sarah Palin between 2008 and 2012 (and I was an enthusiastic supporter of her) I was very active participant in the discussion taking place in the American conservative blogosphere. I became frustrated by the almost eternal misuse by the American Conservatives of the, otherwise noble, word “liberal”.
I tried to explain to them that the term “liberal” means “principled but tolerant”.
In such a case, I can regard myself as a Liberal.
The fact that the American Left stole that WORD and use it to its own advantage doesn’t mean that IT belongs to them.
A PARASITE plunders our language and its vocabulary as “it” plunders EVERYTHING.
If we use the term “liberal” describing our enemies, it becomes the benevolent and thus the acceptable mask that covers the hideous snout of a PARASITE.
So does, obviously to the lesser degree, the word COMMUNIST, hence my determination to point on the ideology as a secondary force in the struggle between GOOD and EVIL.
If we call our enemies liberals or communists, they will lick their lips and laugh at us, but when we call them by what they are, the PARASITES, they will explode into a fury, they will demand an explanation from us and thus they will start losing the control of the NARRATIVE.
This pathetic excuse for an American actor, George Cloney, for example (I call him C’Loony) laughed when confronted about being a “Liberal”. “Yes” – he responded – “I’m a Liberal. I have no qualms with that”. However, if his interlocutor named him a “MOUTH for the PARASITIC sector of America”, he would react exactly like that, explode into fury, descent into a confusion and demand an explanation from us thus losing the control over this exchange.
Regards – Bogdan
Bogdan: Yes, the misuse of language is a major problem. The parasites did steal the word “liberal,” which was a good word. They stole it because it was good. And now they have twisted its meaning. This is how the Newspeak Dictionary worked in George Orwell’s 1984. They have also stolen words like “mainstream” (which has come to signify everything outside the mainstream) and “patriotic” which means “racist.”
Those people may mask as communists but work for the tribal interests.
Communists sometimes do work for tribal interesting, but usually they are manipulating the tribe to enlarge their own power. The truth is, they play a divide and conquer game with tribes and within tribes.
The tribe infiltrated the communist movement, it took Stalin to get rid of them in the USSR. In America there was no auch a purge. If there is to be a revolution in America, it will look more like Turner diaries than the Russian revolution.
This is the same antisemitic nonsense that leads people to see everything wrongside up.
“It has never been explained why Russia continues to preserve Lenin’s mummified corpse as if it were a holy relic. Perhaps Vladimir Putin, despite his criticisms of Lenin, has slyly upheld Lenin’s legacy. ” –JRN
https://news.yahoo.com/putin-sparks-fears-war-nato-175329858.html
Talking to students at the Kant Baltic Federal University, Putin hit out at Kaliningrad’s neighbours for tearing down Soviet war memorials.
“This is stunning ignorance and lack of understanding of where they live, what they are doing and what will follow,” he said.
Putin says, “What will follow?” That sounds more like a commitment to act than a threat.
Media nowadays more often than not, mischaracterizes the facts. In this case, the reporter quotes Putin verbatim, yet spins it with slanted reportage.
The secret of spin is in the context. For every incident there is a proper context. Change that context, and you change the meaning of the incident or fact.
This seems relevant. Governor Greg Abbot is a member of the World Economic Forum. He is deliberately playing into Biden’s plan. Expect declaration of Martial Law. I doubt if there will be kinetic conflict between the Army and the National Guard, or the National Guard and the Border Patrol. Biden will simply nationalize the Guard and declare Martial Law. Then there will be all manor of infringements of the Bill Of Rights, which follow.
I have heard various criticisms of Abbot. Yet he seems to have said something important.
To clarify, as the Russian Communist desire for civil war in the United States, as one particular precondition for attack by Russia against the United States, there doesn’t really have to be civil war; merely the veneer. The declaration of Martial Law and the suspension of the Constitution including the Bill Of Rights, would effectively suffice.
China is a big factor in this, and there needs to be a number of intermediate steps.
What did Abbot say that’s important? What he says about Biden violating his oath and Texas having the right to defend itself, is correct, but the US Supreme Court gave him the green light. It may be up to We The People, but I wouldn’t be too, quick to take up arms. Litigation and lobbying of citizens with officials one by one, might make a difference.
I don’t understand what you mean. The U.S. Supreme court gave which politician the green light to do what? The Supreme Court decided according to law. The common defense of the United States is the job of the Federal Government, not Texas. The House should have impeached Biden on the border question. Why haven’t they? This is the burning question. We cannot expect the Supreme Court to rule contrary to law. And it is a happy day when the governor of Texas points out the President’s dereliction of duty in an election year. We need a big change in this country, and furthermore, we need to eliminate cultural Marxism from all schools and universities supported by taxpayer funds.
I agree with that wholeheartedly, yet the US Supreme Court ruled that the President has the authority to remove border obstructions from a state. It was two conservative Trump appointees to the Bench, which tipped the scales of justice.
Not having read they Justice’s summary, only going on news reports, it seems to me that the conservative position would be that as the President is authorized by the Constitution to defend the borders, it is his discretion to erect or remove barriers there.
Therefore, until Congress impeaches the President for dereliction of duty, violation of the Oath of Office, and/or Treason, then censures him, the Court won’t rule against the President.
Again, this is just my armature opinion, pending more research.
Word is that a trucker’s rally is headed to blockade the border. Biden might well go Waco on their collective derrière. Most of the military are those who knuckled under to the shots and just follow orders. However, there are more honorably discharged US Military troops than currently serving. Many of them are battle hardened and own large private collections of firearms. This no doubt includes the truckers.
My sense is that we are up against paper tigers.
Who exactly is a paper tiger?
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the federal government can remove razor wire erected on the U.S.-Mexico border by Texas law enforcement, which the government argued illegally prevented them from managing the border.
The 5-4 decision vacated an appeals court ruling last month that allowed the wire to stay amid a continued legal standoff over border jurisdiction.
Chief Justice John Roberts led the majority, alongside justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson, with the remaining justices in dissent.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4422203-supreme-court-southern-border-texas-razor-wire-doj/
The Supreme Court’s order did not elaborate on the decision. It means federal border agents can resume full control of the contested border area while litigation continues.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-sides-biden-administration-texas-border-dispute/story?id=106575343
“Take Our Border Back Convoy” is advertised as a “peaceful assembly” of active and former law enforcement, military, ranchers, bikers, business owners, and “Mama Bears.”
https://dnyuz.com/2024/01/26/the-maga-truckers-are-back-and-heading-to-the-border/
Obviously, the President’s refusal to defend the country is the issue. And it is a serious issue.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton responded to the Biden regime’s demands to access the border in Eagle Pass with demands of his own.
The Department of Homeland Security on Tuesday demanded that Texas officials grant the Border Patrol access to the Shelby Park area where razor wire had been installed along the southern border, claiming that area is federal land.
Paxton responded in a letter to Biden’s White House General Counsel on Friday pointing out that Shelby Park is not federal land, but is in fact “municipal land owned by the City of Eagle Pass.”
Furthermore, Paxton issued a counter-demand that the DHS provide proof of the federal government’s authority to turn a Texas park into a port of entry.
“By February 15, 2024, Texas hereby demands that your agency supply the following documents and information to this office: official plat maps and deeds demonstrating the precise parcels that you believe the United States owns; and your explanation of how exactly Texas officials are preventing access to those parcels by federal agents,” Paxton wrote.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/texas-responds-to-bidens-demands-for-border-access-with-demands-of-its-own/
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to enforce the law. Funny thing is, the President has the authority to enforce the law — but he is not enforcing the law. He is opening the border in invasion. The President must be impeached. Why are the Republicans not impeaching him?
Even though Biden wrongly claims that the land is Federal, the US Supreme Court ruled that the President has jurisdiction on the Border. If the razor wire is on the border, then it makes no difference if the land is Federal or not. Then again, in light of Biden’s bogus claim of Federal ownership, perhaps his hands are tied until he drops the condition of Federal ownership from his demands?
I say that Texas ought to put up stacks of containers to block the border of the state, set back a few hundred feet or so from the Border with Mexico, and clear a path to the Mexican border at the borders of New Mexico and Louisiana.
It would be inconvenient for Biden’s escort service, but the path would be to follow the border of Mexico to either New Mexico or Louisiana.
It’s certainly an interesting crisis.
The Supreme Court has no mechanism to enforce its rulings, a fact that President Jackson recognized when he thumbed his nose at it. It depends on other branches of the government to enforce its rulings. That is, if those other branches are willing.
If Texas holds its ground and defies the Supreme Court, as in the example of President Jackson, what will Biden do? Will he order troops to fire on those who try to stop him? If he does that, there will be many more casualties than were at Concord Bridge, that would be the start of a civil war. Is he willing to go that far? Well, Biben is willing, but wouldn’t that cause a split in the military itself? Biden and his side will lose the moral advantage. And they will lose the civil war.
I think civil war suits Biden fine. If Texas tried to challenge Federal power directly Biden might imagine himself the winner. China and Russia would be the real winners, however.
“My sense is that we are up against paper tigers.” –AH
“Who exactly is a paper tiger?” –JRN
Biden is a paper tiger, that is. My sense is that he (‘They’) only want confrontation with controlled opposition. They do not want a situation which they can not conveniently, control. They want to think that because they got everyone to wear a mask, that they can make US do anything, yet They must have an inkling that, that would be quite difficult now, that most people are now beginning to realize that the pandemic was a hoax. I’ll say it again, Americans are NOT as divided as the media makes out. We are fed up with the abuse, and if there were to be a civil war, it would not be American citizens against Americans. It would be against corrupt politicians and useful idiots; a small minority.
Wait until famine results from all the arson of food processing plants, along with China and Bill Gates buying up farmland. Local politicians and bureaucrats will be hiding offshore. Then we will conduct fair elections and replace those vermin.
How do you suppose Biden would like those apples?
If Biden were so keen for civil war, why hasn’t he already bombed the Texas State Capitol?
I do not think Biden is keen for civil war. His friends, who are manipulating from afar (Russia, China), are keen on civil war. They are keen to open every avenue leading to general chaos and collapse.
I wrote a long winded reply that hasn’t posted, essentially saying that Biden is the paper tiger which I referred to.
Biden only wants a civil war with controlled opposition that he can spin as pretext for further infringement of American citizens. He does not want to physically lose his useful idiots, before they die from the Covid shots.
It has not posted? I was sure I hit the button to post. Sometimes they bounce back to unposted, but I just checked and there was none from you not posted. I even replied to it.
Who is Raymond Ibrahim?
Subject: Raymond Ibrahim
“Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Coptic Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East . . . “
Raymond Ibrahim | Hoover Institution
See also his web site:
About (raymondibrahim.com)
Raymond Ibrahim – Middle East and Islam Specialist
We need to be careful. We are like Pilgrim in Pilgrim’s progress, as we go between the two chained lions straining to get us. If we fear the one lion and step back, then the other lion will get us. But if we are careful to stay right in the middle, neither lion can get us.
So likewise, with many ideas, the tendency when one idea is false and dangerous, is to run the other direction. But often the other direction is equally false and dangerous.
“Capitalism” is made to include many ideas, from the neighborhood single-operation shop serving local residents or a family farm, to the massive crony-capitalist international corporation. (When I think of crony-capitalism, I recognize fascism, only superficially different from communism.) The “robber barons”, aka “crony-capitalists”, have given “capitalism” a bad reputation. When people think of “capitalism”, they think first of the fascist robber barons, aka crony-capitalists. The robber barons hate capitalism, so use governments to control or suppress competition, no different from fascism or communism. But people are fooled by names. They think that crony-capitalism = capitalism. Many of those corporations are run by communists or fellow travelers. The people see the evil that the robber barons do, and are repelled. So too many jump from the frying pan into the fire, reject capitalism and embrace communism. Similarly those who see the evils of communism turn to a full-throated embrace of “capitalism” that includes crony-capitalism. We are between two chained lions.
There are other events where we are presented a false dilemma logical fallacy. The Warren Commission Report is just as phony as the many conspiracy theories that it spawned, but all too often we are called to choose one or the other. The same with the official report on the Twin Towers and the Truther movement. The official reports on the Oklahoma City bombing, and the downing of TWA flight 800 are also phony, what is the truth? The same is true of several other events. I expect to go to the grave not knowing the truth, at the same time refuse to do theorizing where I don’t have all the information.
What holds these events together is that they make our institutions stink.
There is one thing that I have found that is weird: remember the controversy about the long form birth certificate for Obama, that first one was finally posted on the web? I mean the one that consisted of several layers that could be opened and individually examined in Adobe Illustrator? I downloaded it and examined it. It showed several signs that it was fake. Even when all I used was Adobe Illustrator. Then I just forgot the file on my hard drive. Recently, I was challenged about what I said about it, so I decided to reopen the file. The one on my hard drive had been swapped for what is presently on the web. I can no longer examine the file that I had originally downloaded. Similarly I downloaded a transcript of an interview a teacher at Parkland High School had given a local news station the next day after the shooting. The interview where the teacher claimed to have seen a man in full body armor at about 15 feet, “What is the SWAT doing here?” then realized that he was shooting using a rifle she didn’t recognize, she then pulled several students into her room, then slammed a difficult to shut door, but not before she had been grazed by a bullet on her upper left arm. I tried to reopen the file on my hard drive, and found a news report containing information that came out months later. The transcript had been exchanged. What is going on?
Extremism is perpetuated in major media as if the majority position on the left and the right. Personally, I don’t know anyone who is extreme at all, but they vote for one party or the other because they don’t believe that a third party or actual independent has a chance of being elected. Extremism is propaganda; subversive politicians notwithstanding.
This may be the game.
Excellent observation about the false dilemma logical fallacy. It sure does feed like we’re running headlong into another one this year with the election, thinking in particular about the standoff taking shape around the Southern Border. Absolutely it’s a true catastrophe. But now we have Trump encouraging red state governors to stand by Abbott and deploy their national guard as back up. What possibly could go wrong.
It reminds me of when Trump called his supporters to DC for a rally on the day Congress was scheduled to certify the election. Again I understand the calamity unfolding at the time, but that was a terrible idea.
The most pernicious and ubiquitous feature of Frankfurt school critical theory is the belief that “truth” always needs quotes because nothing is technically true, but merely a matter of perspective — or, as the more sophisticated professional types might say — an outcome of culturally embedded assumptions that create a paradigm we understand as “truth.” Yes we are now inundated with the perversities of cultural Marxism (e.g., gender fluidity). But the influence is even more pervasive. Even those who call themselves “classical liberals” or even conservatives honestly have hard time bringing themselves to accept that anything actually is true. Even if they really want to. There is always a caveat, for example the differing lenses in a multicultural world. This is why the most careful thinkers spend so much time defining their terms. The most responsible thing to do is identify and describe all your base assumptions. And this IS the right thing to do. But at the heart of it is a pervasive modern sensibility that we can’t ever really reach what’s actually true. And those who do assert truth appear to be “declaring” something that can’t ultimately be proven, and thus they can’t require others to acknowledge or accept it.
This is a key aspect to why the professional class is effectively lobotomized. They believe every important debate — any debate about principles, morality, ethics — can ultimately can be argued to a draw — and so whether realizing it or not, they see REAL virtue as having no claim to principles, morality, or ethics at all. In professional/institutional domains, that is how you maintain an intellectual high ground. It is also how you operate in a purely pragmatic, objective-oriented way (ie, the posture A Party wants for its functionaries). By the way, this is compatible with believing “science”: they understand “scientific knowledge” to be produced by a set of base assumptions and methods and thus “true” for specific purposes. Professionals love “data” for this reason and love to believe THEIR “data” are the most sound. Science, or “facts” produced by technocratic/scientific methods, can be “true” without being true.
This thinking is also extremely hard to break out of. Once trained in that thinking, you can’t fully undo it. I’m a product of it. It’s like when people say you can’t “unsee” something. Once every assumption is there to be “interrogated” it is hard ever to stop, or to accept transcendent truth. I battle it all the time. Even now, I struggle to make an intellectual case for God, where I’m not questioning my own case even as I make it. I found God by a cry of my soul, that’s the best way to describe it. Though I’ve thought about God my whole life, I did not become a believer in God and Christ as a result of intellectual pursuit.
I think identifying and accepting the truth of evil also helped solidify it (mind you I used to think evil was a purely “intellectual” concept defined in terms of one’s assumptions about the good….). I heard somewhere that an atheist referred to something being evidence of Satan, and a believer answered, “if Satan, then God.” It may seems like sort of a sad way to intellectually approach God…. but there’s something profound about it too. To realize truth exists, you need to find a firm footing somewhere. I think God try’s to work with us where we are … and maybe the ability to know in your soul what is the OPPOSITE of God, helps you to work out intellectually what must be characteristics of God. I know in my bones that Marxism is diabolical. I believe it requires a grasp of good and evil to identify the dynamics of Marxism, which may be why it’s difficult.
Anyway, this is a bit of a meandering comment. I’ve spent a lot of time around the lobotomized professional class. Nyquist’s observations ring 100% true.
There is a vintage television episode of Kung-fu where the master tells Caine that:
“Truth is most difficult to ascertain. We can only try to be as honest as we can.”
That was a popular show when I was in junior high.
Oh, you’re just a young’un.
Mr. Nyquist, I thought you might be interested, though not a Catholic, in this quotation of Malachi Martin (from the 1991 book “Keys of This Blood”) I heard in a talk given by a late confidant of Martin’s, Suzanne Pearson: “If there were one dominant element in the third secret, it was Russia. The provisions of the Third Secret make sense only in relation to Russia. The geopolitical change implied by the Third Secret was not far off. Russia was its womb, Russia was its focal point. Russia was to be the main agent of change. Russia was to be a source of universal blindness and error. In that Secret, the choice between world peace or world catastrophe is described in terms of Mary and Russia. The reform or the mortal deficiency of the church is also described in terms of Mary and Russia.” In Windswept House, Martin narrates that in the 1960 meeting in which the Third Secret was opened and read in the presence of John XXIII and some clergymen, they had the impression that the one who wrote down the Third Secret in 1944, Sister Lucia dos Santos, had probably been traumatized by the movement of Russian troops near her convent in the locality of Tuy during the Spanish Civil War. Basically, then, some psychologized the writer of the Secret and the Secret’s emphasis on Russia; despite the Secret allegedly having been given to the three children in 1917, and the children, upon hearing it, allegedly had no idea whatsoever what Russia was.
I do not understand. Sister Lucy’s vision at Tuy Spain took place in 1929, several years before the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. Furthermore, none of the Russians sent to Spain during the civil war got anywhere near Tuy Spain. The area was solidly in the Nationalist Zone of control from the first days of the war till the end. If Sister Lucy wrote down her visions in 1944, the Spanish Civil War ended in 1939. She could not have been frightened by Russian troops.
I don’t know the details of Sister Lucia’s precise whereabouts during the Civil War, but I got the impression from Frere Michel’s chronological work on Fatima that Sister Lucia had, in all probability, a certain degree of networking correspondence with Spanish clergymen from a number of places during her adult life as a religious. She prescribed at least one thing for the Spanish bishops to do collegially, namely, a religious retreat, and that was well received. From this perspective, it is plausible that by means, at least, of correspondence with Spanish individuals, she may have gotten a lively impression of the Civil War. From memory, I’d say Malachi Martin isn’t terribly specific about how her experience went during the Civil War in this early passage in Windswept House, nor was the passage intended, if I recall, to imply that those who suggested her being impressionable (during the 1960 meeting) were very knowledgeable about her chronology.
I should add that I made a mistake in that I am not sure the passage in Windswept House even mentioned Tuy specifically; it did mention Spain and talked about the proximity of Russian troops, howsoever relative a proximity in retrospect (from the point of view of one examining the novel’s passage), during the Civil War as a seemingly traumatic experience.
We can’t afford controlled opposition, all they do is slow the collapse and death rates.
Thanks Bogdan for the parasite analogy. They are nothing but parasites, sucking the life out of us and everything good. They can call us “deplorable,” “racists,” ect, then we can call them parasites-that is truly what they are. They are all so weak, pitiful and spineless, depending on whoever really is in charge, to not take them out, because they are good boys and girls and follow the agenda. And we work our butts off to pay for our own extermination? Are we any better?
I had a dream once, there was a lion roaring in my face and I had to keep feeding it steaks to pacify him. He kept hanging around waiting for another one and never left. We are feeding these parasite lions steaks, they just get bigger and stronger and take more and more from us.
I wasn’t submitting to God and He was showing me I was feeding the lion, so the lion wasn’t leaving me alone.
God calls the devil, a roaring lion roaming about looking for whom he can devour. If we submit to God and do what God says, the enemy has to flee.
Jesus when facing the devil in the wilderness, submitted to Gods word and the Devil left.
People must realize the demonic realm exists and it’s out to kill, steal and destroy our lives through deception and lies. Jesus said in these times many would be deceived and fall away.
“Be strong and courageous and don’t give into fear.”
If we all send our national guard to Texas, who’s left to protect us from this enemy invasion in our own states?
Money deceives and is the root of all evil. Evil with money builds their high walls that shuts themselves and their children out of heaven. They have more opportunities to do good to help us overcome evil, Instead they used it to partner with the devil, who is only out to eventually destroy them too. Read your history!
“It’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Mark-18:25)
Yes, when you cry out to God, He will answer. Can a Mother ignore her crying infant?
We can’t rely on people, we have to rely on God. The people Jesus was counting on in the garden in his hour of need, while He was sweating drops of blood, were sleeping. God sent an Angel to help and strengthen Him. God is our helper and all we need.
Pray, Lord if there is anything you want me to do, I will do it. What he brings into your mind and spirit, showing you confirmation and His peace, lock down on it and get it done. You need to be able to stand under overwhelming pressure. Pressure makes diamonds. There is no greater and safer place to be than in Gods will. He created you for such a time as this.
Jeff you’re one of the only “ good” lions I know.
A lion wouldn’t allow you to destroy its babies, it’s family, it’s home, it would shred you to pieces. Keep on roaring Jeff!
Thank you!
Meow. 🙃
Thank you, Mary. Stefan Molyneux who was until three years ago the most popular political and social conservative you tuber and who was expelled from You Tube for his uncompromising devotion to truth and intellectual honesty, expressed the attitude of a PARASITE towards, whom I call a HUMAN OF SMART AND HONEST WORK, in the most compact and yet illustrative way: “I hate you because you aren’t giving me enough of your money! Give me more of your money I will hate you a bit less”. This hatred is an integral part of both PARASITIC ideologies: Marxism/Leninism/ Communism with their derivatives (ecofascism, feminofascism, genderofascism and others with their local characteristics) and Islam. However, Marxism is much more blatant in expressing this hatred while Islam is, at least temporarily, a bit more subtle.
Regards – Bogdan
Some bits and pieces.
Since Christianity in Russia is declining more and more, Lenin’s corpse might as well stay unburied. Only around 1% (1.4 million) of Russians attended Christmas services in 2024, which is around half of what it was in 2015.
https://twitter.com/Africawithsnow/status/1748722436667785261
Speaking of corruption, Russia’s closest ally in Europe, Hungary, leads the EU in public sector corruption. Russia is the most corrupt country in Europe –someone alert Rep Greene! Ukraine is only a few points ahead of Russia, true, but that’s an achievement given what tremendous strain the whole country is under.
https://www.politico.eu/article/hungary-orban-corruption-transparency-international/
The story about Ukraine possibly downing a POW transport plane over Belgorod, Russia is heating up. There are doubts that the plane was even transporting POWs. Ukraine has carried out some spectacular drone and sabotage attacks deep into Russia, so I wonder why this downed plane is such a big story. Around New Years, when Russia launched a massive attack on Ukrainian cities, it claimed that Ukraine hit the city of Belgorod with missiles, indiscriminately killing civilians. That’s the first time in this war a Russian city was attacked like those in Ukraine, so more likely it was a false flag attack like the 1999 apartment bombings. Lately things seem to keep happening around Belgorod, could there be something to all this?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1859978/russia-pows-propaganda-plash-crash-ukraine
There seems to be a flurry of speculation lately about war with Russia and Europe’s ability to defend itself. Some high-ranking politicians and defence people are saying that war may be inevitable. Is this a sign that more people are waking up? Or is this flurry of worry just setting the stage for Western Europe choosing to surrender rather than fight, possibly with the US withdrawing support for NATO? I’m just reminded of what Jeff said in his very interesting discussion with Trevor Loudon. Still, the fact that war with Russia is being seriously talked about is a good sign, although this is more in Europe than the US. Maybe it also has to do with the NATO military exercise.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1859581/europe-defence-russia-war-usa-manfred-weber-warning
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1859976/germany-defence-not-ready-russia-nato
Interesting, Pistorius could be a hawkish alternative to Scholz. But Germany is struggling to recruit 20,000 additional troops to add to an already very small army.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pengajg8if8 ‘Putin needs war’ in Europe, NATO must prepare to stop Russia | Dr Jamie Shea
Russia is creating a war society, Europe needs to prepare
Interesting that Russian Church attendance on major holy days has decreased from 4 percent to 1 percent.
These warnings from Germany sound serious but I’m skeptical about how it would play out. I doubt the U.S. would officially withdraw support from NATO. It would be more muddled than that. For example, I believe that any country that starts to truly take its own security seriously likely will be tarred as fascist (because anything that opposes communism is “fascist”). Part of the problem with NATO is that most of its leadership is bought into a global communist future (as fronted by the WEF), and thus philosophically and morally opposed to the sorts of policies required to truly defend a nation.
A true mobilization toward war would recognize the necessity of a manufacturing base, access to energy, secure food, a hearty youth oriented toward duty and sacrifice, a genuine effort to police national borders for enemy mischief and infiltration …. in other words, if you’re going to talk about war, you’re really implying a whole set of nationalistic policies that are anathema to most of Western leadership (even the “acceptable” non-deplorable right). The problem with “hawkish” U.S. politicians (in both parties) is how simultaneously hollow and weak they are as leaders. And how sold out they are to global communism. Any “hawk” that signs up for the WEF agenda is simultaneously shutting down our energy infrastructure and production while clamoring “let’s round up more money for those poor saps over there to fight” and “let’s get our contractors on board to start making more weapons over the next 20 years.” It’s a massive disconnect. That kind of hawkishness is unserious, and people aren’t having it. It may be partly why those who should see the moment we’re in — i.e., conservatives — are unmoved, and more focused on what they see as getting our country back.
So in that context, I wonder how a mobilized Germany would go down with NATO, especially given Germany’s history. I think we’re more likely to see an internecine battle about “controlling the impulses of fascism within our own alliance” — meaning stopping any NATO country from actually acting in its national interest (outside approved, ineffective actions) — rather than a wholesale breakup of the alliance. If NATO becomes embroiled in an identity crisis of sorts, the upshot might be pockets of war with Russia in the context of some protracted, convoluted “negotiation,” involving China, and a resulting “New World Order” with the East as the center. The United States thus effectively isolated before the “big” war gets started. We’re the main target. Anyway that’s just a thought, looking at the political logic being constructed around us… it’s also probably a longer way of saying that I can see the logic where Western Europe is likely to surrender.
You are exactly right. Any serious resistance by the West to Russia and China’s military expansionism will require the complete reversal of Marxist policies that have infected political and intellectual life for decades. And this reversal will be impossible without first naming the enemy, specifically Russian communism and Chinese communism. So, going by the talk in the articles I linked, NATO resistance is in its infancy right now. We will see what comes of it. What you described in the last paragraph, the West’s re-armament derailed by self-doubt and divisions over the growing specter of “fascism”, could totally happen.
———————
Link to Trevor Loudon interview.
https://rumble.com/v48cc33-guest-jeff-nyquist-the-trevor-loudon-report-1.21.24-4pm.html
The $64,000 question: will the MAGA movement listen to reason on the threat of Russia, or will they be pushed into an even more radical direction by the time of the election? Even if Trump were to lose, the damage done by the rhetoric coming from the MAGA camp could still be bad enough, just looking at what’s happening with the funding bills in the House. And then there’s the threat of, maybe not so much civil war, but complete paralysis at the federal level, with states like Texas de facto withdrawing from the union in certain limited respects.
Moderates from both parties need to come together and force the federal government to do its job. This would be easier if there was a large and united “middle America” rather than what we have now, the political discussion being dominated by far left/communists and far-right/conspiracists. On a hopeful note, I read that Haley got 45% of the vote in the NH primary, so there is evidently still a large enough not-completely-radicalized mass of right-wingers. With better leadership, organization and energy this base could provide a viable alternative to the extreme leftism of the Dems and the national security anarchy of the MAGA right.
Your writing style is captivating! This short story pulled me in from the first sentence. You have a gift for creating immersive worlds with your words.
I liked Jimmy from Brooklyn’s explanation of front groups and Waller makes the great point, describes in Chapter 9 of his book, regarding Communist parties who create so many front
organizations within a city or a country (like the U.S.). He describes it as a “common template”.
“…a common variation went like this: The Communists ran a command structure of vertical networks of controlled cadres from Moscow center to the streets of any given country or city. The cadres worked in covert groups called cells. From the cells they built horizontal networks across sectors: labor, education, the arts and trades, culture, politics, and even business and religion…”
“The vertical command structure would assign people in the horizontal networks to join or penetrate certain organizations…
building new cells in each…”
“From the horizontal networks at the low levels, a cadre would join an organization as recruits or volunteers ‘from below’ the grassroots, and would build alliances with people in the middle and upper levels, setting up controlled cells along the way.”
“Cell members in the middle would elevate favored loyalists from below and pressure non-Communists at the top, when possible with help from those already working ‘from above’. This is how small numbers would take over existing and trusted organizations.
Defectors revealed that the party needed very few people to take control of an entire organization once they seized a few levers of power.”
This is a brilliant strategy and sadly the majority of Americans are clueless how the Communists have slowly infiltrated our society for decades.
I am pleasantly surprised to read Wallers’s writing of a young J Edgar Hoover and how the man was dedicated in hunting down and revealing Communists here who were working to infiltrate America’s constitutional government. Hoover knew what would happen if the Communists were allowed into our institutions. As opposed to how a so-called “investigative reporter” and author like Whitney Webb who writes more about Hoover’s personal life as a sexual pervert, totally ignoring and leaving out his anti-Communist work at all.
I have seen this network at work, and it is real.
He is very ambigous, in an interview for the Budapester Zeitung he stated that war is a proxy war of the United States, that this war is not “ours” (of Germany and Hungary) and so on, here is the link: unfortunatley it is in german but if you’re interested in you can use google translator:
https://www.budapester.hu/politik-interview/maassen-wir-werden-letztendlich-gewinnen/
That is clarifying.
Maaßen misunderstands the reason for the war in Ukraine—he sees it as an attempt by the U.S. for regime change in Russia. That he sees as unwinnable. Therefore, he does not see it as something for either Germany or Hungary to take part in the war.
I think he is mistaken. The war was started by Putin in 2014.
Communist Party is worldwide, the brain sits in Moscow (Kremlin and then Lyublianka = KGB), and then the orders come from there to their worldwide network of spies, snitches, informers and agents, and this is what the Comintern was tasked with, and now it appears there was a change of name for it and it is called WEF (and it has become a think-tank also), but the communist ideology and strategy remains the same.
That there was no collapse of communism is evident by just looking at the FACT that there was never any true justice carried out against this terrorist atheistic organization, and that all communist leaders and their subordinates were protected by the “new and democratic” regimes in Eastern Europe and also in the USSR (although there the “changes” were much more cosmetic than in the rest of the communist bloc).
They even executed Chauchescu in Romania and replaced him with KGB agent Iliescu, as it was evident even then that this is a major communist fraud and that God and freedom loving people must never accept such promotional fraud from the godless Bolsheviks, because there is no fear of God in these atheistic criminals and thus they have no problem to lie thru their teethes when they are required by their evil ends to do so (and the Communist Party insists on this requirement punctually).
The point is clear – it is now too late because they have penetrated all worldwide governments and now have only one goal – worldwide communist takeover, Moscow in change. (China is secondary in it, but equally hostile and evil, but the Kremlin is firmly in charge – no matter how much they try to cover it up).
Then comes their evil and manifest intentions, which are supported by their unlimited re-armament, which has been long overlooked by the western countries, including the United States, and this with the help of the vast communist infiltration of the intelligence services, military and any other related government entities.
What to do about it ? This has been said before and nobody listens, why should it be necessary to repeat it then ? People will find out that when it comes to their own lives and they are being ruled by ruthless brutal terrorist and godless communist regimes, and that once the communists control the country’s justice system they use it always against their political opponents (and every other resistance), to crush it and destroy it.
Communists are godless fanatics and only firm force against them will help, but God is the one Who needs to the main aid, otherwise it will fail. Human endeavor will not do, as communism is diabolical scourge and cannot be eradicated by human means only, but solely by the Divine help, which help God will not grant to them that don’t belong to Him or those who neglect to learn and to believe the truth about Him…and most of this godless world is like this today…evil times are here and for this very reason that God is offended and men don’t care that it is so.
(Sister Lucia was murdered by the communists possibly in the early 1950s and replaced by [no doubt] communist agent heretic woman, and this is because what Sr. Lucia told Fr. Fuentes and William T. Walsh that communism [that is Russia in charge] will take over the whole world, including the United States. Then this heretic woman impostor, when the fraudulent “collapse of communism” took place in late 1980s, she spoke publicly about it and said that conversion means a country converting from evil to good – which is a heresy what she said. There is a video of it, and plus she accepted this new non-Catholic religion and went to their Protestant ceremony regularly, which is not the true Mass, and so it is evident that a saintly soul that was favored by God with several Divine apparitions, including those of His Mother, would have never accepted this apostate religion as Catholic. – Many will be sorry that they accepted it, and this will be cured by God with this communist atheistic Russian run worldwide tyranny.)
French farmers spray mass quantities of manure on French government buildings.
https://twitter.com/xo89898/status/1749883592820601262
French farmers herd sheep in city streets.
https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1750644525679431783
You won’t see MSM telling you about this….
But across Europe, there is serious civil unrest…
Up in arms & fed up, along with many other European nations, of the draconian measures being imposed by the WEF, WHO, UN, EU, & THE like
Unelected officials.. We are done with your meddling
https://twitter.com/truthscant/status/1750649525587313063
The farmers protest have now spread to Poland.
All over Europe the farmers are standing up against tyranny.
SHARE if you support the farmers – The media is not showing you this
https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7/status/1750504788876312667
Thank you for your work as always, Jeff! I have a few questions and I was wondering if you could provide some insight.
– Does the majority of Russians support the war in Ukraine?
– Is their economy in a dire situation? If so, could it lead to an acceleration to WW3?
– I’m fascinated by Alois Irlmaier’s predictions about the future, could we really see a Russian civil war as he predicted?
– Do you think these lunatics will take the Baltic states soon?
– Around 1-2 years ago, you wrote about a billboard (I think it was in Siberia) with something to the effect of “Alaska is ours”. Seems like Russian officials are now much more vocal about taking this state back and Medvedev hinted at Texas seceding from the union. Would this pave the way for California doing the same? Could they start a civil war under Trump (assuming he gets elected)?
Hope you don’t mind the flurry of questions : )
Thank you!
It is difficult to measure Russian public opinion because of the punishments used against people who oppose the war. Some observers claim that around a million Russians have voted against the war by leaving Russia. Dissatisfaction with the war was growing last year, but Russian media is putting on a more impressive show. The Russian war economy is gearing up and Russians may be feeling more like winners as support for Ukraine dwindles abroad. People are liking Russia’s chances more than previously. This may have caused an uptick in support.
Is Russia’s economy in a dire situation? Konstantin Samoilov of the Inside Russia podcast has reported on problems in the Russian economy. The Russian government has serious budgetary problems, and there are problems with Chinese products being used to substitute for European products in aircraft and industry. There have been serious problems with the Russian power infrastructure in Siberia (Novisibirsk) and Rostov. Yet nothing here indicates a coming collapse. Whatever hardships are reported, the Russian economy does not seem to be in as dire a situation as the Chinese economy. However, Russia has been cut off from global finance in large part, and that does not bode well for future growth and investment. If Russia does not repair its relationship with Europe, there will be serious hardship for Russia in future years.
Irlmaier’s predictions are interesting, since many appear to have come true already. Of course, Russia could experience a civil war or revolt. Historically, Russia experienced revolutions at the end of the Russo-Japanese War and World War I. The same dynamic could play out again.
As for Alaska becoming part of Russia, that would only happen if Russia and China attacked the U.S. military with nuclear strikes to open up the possibility of invasion. Only the use of nuclear weapons would make invasion feasible. I am one who believes a nuclear strike against U.S. Naval, air and nuclear assets is possible. Special conditions would have to be in place beforehand, however; for example, the collapse of the U.S. economy, civil war in the U.S., or a major terrorist operation that shuts down the power grid.
“Special conditions would have to be in place beforehand,…” Why?
“…collapse of the U.S. economy…” Even in the worst of the Great Depression, brought on by FDR’s policies, didn’t completely collapse the U.S. economy. Severe hardship, yes, but not a complete shutdown of the economy.
“…civil war in the U.S.…” I think is unlikely. I could be wrong.
“…major terrorist operation…” The many thousands of military fit men that traitor Biden has allowed into the U.S., joined to the weapons smuggled in by China, can make one hell of a terrorist operation.
“…shuts down the power grid.” There are many ways that could be accomplished. Maybe the most likely is merely turning off the switch in the hacked computer controls, which they could merely turn back on once they conquered the land.
Wouldn’t a nuclear attack itself cause the collapse of the U.S. economy, be a major terrorist operation and shut down the power grid? With that being the case, why would there be any need of these precursors?
The problem with any nuclear attack is the relatiation. The Russians and Chinese will not use nuclear weapons unless they have decisive advantages that promise to reduce the effectiveness of retaliation. A sudden, bolt-from-the-blue attack without softening the target country beforehand is always possible, but it is not optimal from the point of view of avoiding severe damage from retaliatory attacks. If the U.S. has suffered internal collapse, civil war, or terrorist attacks disrupting the power grid, the U.S. nuclear response will be degraded. Also, civil war and terrorist attacks are sufficiently diversionary as to mask the source of any nuclear strikes. The confusion would be greater, and the timely execution of retaliatory attacks could be delayed making a succesful first strike more likely.
Seriously, if the Soviets and CCP mount an overwhelming nuclear attack on the U.S., how much retaliation could we mount? This would especially be true if the attack were launched from submarines a short distance off shore. The distances are so short that our bomber fleet will be caught on the ground. Our missiles have been ordered to absorb the first strike—they don’t have to be destroyed, just have their blast doors so damaged that they can’t open. The Soviets will have their ABM systems on alert, how many surviving missiles will get through? The whole thing depends on suddenness and surprise.
Wouldn’t the true test be the resistance to the ground invasion? The Soviets and CCP can’t win without subjugating the mainland U.S., which necessitates a ground invasion. Will that succeed?
If they were confident of winning a first strike with acceptable political, economic or military damage to themselves they would have done it.
As I understand it, the only reason they didn’t attack last year was because the Chinese were behind schedule in getting their land forces ready for the necessary invasion to follow the nuclear attack. That is the picture I got from the smuggled out CCP audio. This has also given them another year to bring in more troops through traitor Biden’s open door.
Ah well, discussions are stimulating however, there is a day coming soon that average American’s will have to lock and load and defend their own tiny square here against the invaders.
A slightly off-topic question.
We have seen in the Russian media a lot of threats aimed at Poland and the Baltic states, to the point that they are commonly viewed as the next targets of invasion should Russia succeed in Ukraine. But could this be a deliberate distraction, with the real target of the next Russian offensive being weaker countries like Moldova and Romania? Moldova would be a more obvious target because it is extremely impoverished and not a NATO member. Romania, although a member of NATO, is smaller and weaker than Poland and less united/awake to the threat of Russia than the Baltic states. Romania has oilfields and an opening to the Black Sea, which would increase Russia’s strategic advantage over the West; it is also one of the poorest EU members with a very under-developed transportation system that would make it logistically difficult to mobilize a large army and receive significant military support from NATO. There is also the consideration of Russia forging a direct land corridor to the large weapons cache masquerading as Transnistria. Again, I’m just speculating here. On the other hand, attacking Moldova/Romania is less in keeping with the “Russian world” narrative, and we saw with Ukraine that Russian propaganda laid the groundwork for over a decade before the large-scale invasion. Nevertheless, I wonder if a devastating surprise attack against a less defended part of NATO would be more advantageous now to Russia’s strategy of breaking up NATO.
The politics of “nationalist” opposition to Ukraine in Eastern Europe are interesting. As in most other countries, there is significant Russian money and effort put into the infiltration of Romanian politics and national security. But the most stridently pro-Russian faction, as with sections of MAGA, is the self-described “ultra-conservative” and “ultra-patriotic” faction. They resentfully point to the much smaller number –compared to Poland—of Ukrainian refugees in the country who are being helped too much, ahead of impoverished citizens. (I need to research more whether this is true, but either way, clearly envy and resentment can be a powerful force in politics given the right circumstances.) These “nationalists” dream of annexing Romanian-speaking regions of Ukraine. Almost all Ukrainians are stereotyped as bandits, thieves and opportunists with Zelensky of course, being the Hitlerite mafia don in chief. I am constantly lectured that Romanians in Ukraine have *always* been terribly oppressed and persecuted by the Ukrainians, and how they are now forcibly kidnapped into fighting for the evil Ukrainian army. The counter-argument is, if they were so terribly persecuted all these decades, why didn’t they emigrate to the two neighboring majority Romanian-speaking countries, one of which has been a member of the EU since 2007? Why did they stay there and keep their Ukrainian citizenship? Same question goes for the Russian minorities in other former East Bloc nations. The whole thing smells like the typical Russian exploitation of minorities to weaken central government and national unity in the countries they mean to control. The most hilarious thing about these “nationalists” is that they forget that countries like Hungary and Serbia, which can also lay historical claims to Romanian territory, have been tight with Moscow for much longer and are therefore higher-up in the pecking order. And by violating international treaties and illegally annexing territory, Romania would effectively withdraw from NATO and be left all alone to face a Russian invasion.
https://inliniedreapta.net/articole/russia-friendly-party-aur-calls-on-romania-to-annex-four-parts-of-ukraine/
27 ianuarie 2024
https://inliniedreapta.net/monitorul-neoficial/fostul-ambasador-sua-serviciile-romane-trebuie-sa-i-scoata-pe-rusi-din-ecuatia-politica-romana/
former USA ambassador to Romania – security services must ramp up efforts to rid Romanian politics and economy of Russian influence
Laura: An interesting thing about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, was the pincer movement from the north and south. The southern pincer aimed at the capture of Odessa as well as linking up with Moldova. As you probably know, the Russians control a strip of breakaway territory in Moldova called Transnistria where elements of a Russian motorized rifle brigade are deployed. There are massive Russian bunkers with military equipment stockpiled in Transnistria, and large airstrips capable of accomodating the largest Russian troop transports (and also access up river by sea).
It is believed that Russian troops were striving mightily to link up with Transnistria even as Russian spetsnaz and spies were flooding into Moldova. If you recall, the flagship of the Rusisan Black Sea fleet, The Heavy Cruiser Mosva, was pounding anti-air positions around Odessa until the Ukrainians finally sank it. I believe the Russians not only had aircraft standing by to move troops into transnistria, but they had marine formations ready to transfer in. They just never got the anti-aircraft nuetralized or the sea passage opened. I think the original plan was for a coup and takeover of Moldova as troops were airlifted into Transnistria. This would have flanked Ukraine’s defenses from the south.
As we know, the Russian plan to reach Odessa/Transnistria met with setbacks. On the way to Odessa, Russia forces reached the outskirts of Ukraine’s naval port of Nikolaev. It was expected to fall and a Ukrainian warship was scuttled there; but the city held and the Russians were pushed back across the lower Dnepro River. With the Russian fleet seriously hurt after the loss of its flagship, the operation to reach Moldova had to be shelved.
This is all good news for Ukraine and Romania, but the Russians are persistent. This is their national trait, and it is a good trait to have. When Russia has the forces to try again, they will make another push. So far they do not appear to have the forces necessary to get back over the lower Dnepro River.
There is another way for the Russians to skin their Moldovan cat, however. Lauren Morris was recently in Romania where she reported on how the Russians were trying to divide Romanians and Moldovans. This is standard practice. Also, if the hidden communist structures in Poland can stage a political comeback, it is possible for them to do this in Romania. So we have to watch local conditions closely. All the former communist countries of Eastern Europe retain communist structures that want to get back on top. For example, in the book “The Grey Men,” which is about the Stasi in East Germany, a well-financed and motivated remnant of Stasi officials remain active and hopeful that communist power will be restored (with Russian help). It sounds crazy, but true-believing communists are in all these countries networking with various groups to recover political power. In Germany as in the other countries, the communists remain organized and active. They have not been barred from politics. And they have resources at their disposal.
So yes, Romania is in danger. The main problem for Russia in this case is the Dnepro River. If the Russian Army is not across this river in force, then Romania is a very distant objective. First they have to breach the river, and this does not appaer to be in prospect. Meanwhile, Poland and the Baltic States are close to Belarussian and Russian forces that can be mobilized rather quickly to stage attacks.
I kinda believed the opposite. Russia could have overwhelmingly used the full force of its army to steamroll Ukraine. I believe that only full force of NATO can defeat Russia, assuming if the Soviet saboteurs in Western elite class didn’t degrade NATO/US armed capabilities so much.
Russia actually walked into Kiev in 3 days but later they pulled out. One of many reasons was the complex bunker systems from Soviet era. The biggest reason is probably related to money schemes between Russian Soviets and European Soviets. For many reasons, defense companies in the West and Russia make record profits.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-war-orders-starting-boost-revenues-big-us-defense-contractors-2023-10-27/
https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/91235
https://news.yahoo.com/kim-partnership-russia-fuels-economic-103700851.html
Additionally, the sanctions against Russia never truly worked as Western companies still continue doing business with the Russian Soviets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJusZyN-yn8
https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-oil-vladimir-putin-ukraine-war-wide-open-back-door-to-europe-critics-say/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-russian-oil-is-reaching-the-u-s-market-through-a-loophole-in-the-embargo
The Ukraine War reminds me of the Soviet-Afghan War which Golitsyn and other defectors considered as a sham to make money for Soviet elites in USSR and the West, while it is a deceptive strategy to believe the USSR’s fake collapse.
If the West truly determined to defeat Russia, NATO troops should have been on the ground officially. This is exactly what I remain very skeptical about Western commitment against communism since the whole elite classes of the West are severely Sovietized. Only Ukrainians are aware of Soviet evil – Anatoliy Golitsyn was an Ukrainian by the way. Sadly, no one took the Ukrainians seriously enough.
The political news isn’t good. According to recent polling the far-right AUR is the 2nd or 3rd most popular party at 20%, tied with the center-right Liberal Party, and could be poised to form a coalition government after the 2024 parliamentary elections. Their share of the vote has doubled since 2020, similar to Germany’s AfD.
If Romania goes the way of Slovakia and Poland, that would mean Ukraine being pretty much surrounded by open (or covert) Russian allies in the west and north. Belarus, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania. Would this impact the logistics of supplying Ukraine, assuming the West could muster the necessary number of shells and equipment in the first place?
https://www.euronews.com/2023/11/28/romania-is-facing-crucial-elections-in-2024-will-the-country-put-the-rising-far-right-in-p
https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/romania/
That would be the encirclement of Ukraine.
Encirclement doesn’t sound good. On the other hand, I haven’t heard anything about the new Polish government wanting to block Western military aid that is going through Poland. It is likely that Tusk has to play the Biden role and pretend to support Ukraine while secretly aiding Russia, so there is an advantage in that he can’t be too obvious about his true allegiance. At least I hope that’s the case. Otherwise, if other governments like Romania turn hard against Ukraine, the only other way of supplying them would be by the Black Sea.
Laura: I could be wrong, but I think the objective is to slowly strangle Ukraine without leaving any fingerprints. Do it so that the German right takes the blame, or the Americans take the blame. Something along those lines.
Subject: Raymond Ibrahim
“Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Coptic Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East . . . “
https://www.hoover.org/profiles/raymond-ibrahim
See also his web site:
https://www.raymondibrahim.com/about/
and
https://www.raymondibrahim.com/
Just started watching your latest video 1/28 with Alex B. discussing Waller’s book (great read btw).
This story is from the day after the attack on Israeli civilians. How many Evangelical Christians are burying their heads in the sand and pretending the Kremlin shares their values?
https://cepa.org/article/only-good-news-today-russias-propagandists-delight-as-israelis-die/
Kremlin-endorsed propagandists celebrated the fighting as a distraction to tear the West’s eyes from Ukraine, produced new conspiracy theories to explain the news, and delighted in the discomfort and fear of Russian Jews who have emigrated to Israel. They couldn’t decide whether Iran, Russia’s ally, or Ukraine supplied Hamas with weapons. But they made it clear that the Palestinians are Russia’s natural allies, not Israel.
I want to relate a personal story here. Jeff has noted this before, that conspiracy theories fueled by hatred and resentment run in the same circles. Once a person believes in one outlandish conspiracy theory it is much easier to believe in another. I have a close relative, about Jeff’s age, who pretty much subscribes to the very negative view of Ukrainians I mentioned in the previous post, often referring to them as Bolsheviks. Likely she believed a milder version of this view even before the 2022 invasion. But what’s more interesting is that, gradually, since the October 7 attack on Israel, she also began spouting very pro-Palestinian narratives, likening Israel to an Apartheid/Nazi state that is trying to exterminate the Palestinian population. Lately she is even insinuating that a cabal of Jewish oligarchs (eg. Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates –note the last 2 are not even Jewish) controls or aspires to control most of the world. It is useless to argue with her on those points, she just becomes angrier and shoutier the more you disagree with her. The turn to outright anti-Semitism –which of course she denies—is significant because I never once in my life heard her express anything like that. Before, she subscribed to the mainstream conservative belief in Israel’s right to defend itself. She also considers herself a believing Christian. But now, as she says, she has been awakened to the truth about Israel by the brilliant online lectures of Ivy League-educated academics like Prof. Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs. She often argues from authority, as if a person’s credentials and status are the chief determinants of truth. I should point out that this relative didn’t have an entirely stable personality to begin with, but nevertheless, the complete radicalization and sheer volume of hatred she now spews are at times frightening. It is worrying to see her try to bully and impose her political views on other acquaintances who are more on the fence politically. She is not always bad, but, having the zeal of a new convert, she oftentimes can’t help herself. In the last 4 years, since the dawn of Covid, I have seen her descend more and more into a gnostic, conspiracy theory view of the world.
As ridiculous as it seems, Russian propaganda is effective at convincing a subset of Westerners. Maybe a small but highly radicalized and vocal subset is enough to advance the communists’ plans.
Laura: Emerging narratives are increasingly collapsable into the Elders of Zion conspiracy — or watered down versions of the same. It is shocking. People who wouldn’t have touched such ideas with a ten foot pole ten years ago are falling into it. The descent into conspiracy theory is visible, here in Michigan, at the local level. My shock and disappointment scales with my surprise at the Christian folk who are succumbing to it. I had thought there was a solid and sane subset of traditionalists in America. Yet, the Russian strategists are such good psychologists, they clearly have laid the foundations of their narratives so carefully, and they have correctly estimated the intellectual shallowness of our political culture. Our people have neglected their history, their philosophy, their grasp of strategy. They know very little, and have relied on such shallow punditry too long. I am hoping this phase will pass, that most people will snap out of it, that our opinion leaders will guide the hapless flock back to Anglo-Saxon common sense. Yet, the pundits are showing signs of interior instability, lack of intellectual culture and shallowness. Of course, we are talking mostly about TV “personalities” rather than serious persons. TV brings us up short once again. And here lies the problem.
The President must be impeached. Why are the Republicans not impeaching him? –JRN
Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/21/2021)
This resolution impeaches President Joseph Robinette Biden for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Specifically, the resolution sets forth an article of impeachment stating that, in his former role as Vice President, President Biden abused the power of that office through enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors by allowing his son Hunter Biden to influence the domestic policy of a foreign nation and accept benefits from foreign nationals in exchange for favors.
The article states that, by such conduct, President Biden
endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government;
threatened the integrity of the democratic system;
interfered with the peaceful transition of power;
imperiled a coordinate branch of government; and
demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security, democracy, and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office.
The article also states that this conduct warrants immediate impeachment, trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/57
Dec. 13, 2023
By Scott Wong, Kyle Stewart and Rebecca Kaplan
WASHINGTON — The GOP-controlled House on Wednesday voted to authorize its impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden — a formal step Republicans believe will grant them the ability to better enforce their subpoenas in the courts.
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-investigate-whether-president-biden-sought-to-obstruct-his-sons-cooperation-with-the-houses-impeachment-inquiry/
The House Homeland Security Committee released draft articles of impeachment Sunday against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
https://www.wnd.com/2024/01/articles-impeachment-drafted-bidens-dhs-secretary/
That reportedly happened around January 2017 and involved CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko.
https://www.wnd.com/2024/01/feds-sued-details-alleged-cia-plot-get-rid-president-trump/
You gotta love Judicial Watch.
They must push these impeachment bills against all officials implicated in treason and misprision of treason.
There is nobody at Eagle’s Pass Border and the gate is wide open.
https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1751393423653744723
What happened to the razor wire?
Three U.S. soldiers were killed and dozens wounded in a drone strike by a pro-Iranian militia on a U.S. outpost in northeast Jordan overnight, President Biden said in a statement on Sunday.
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/28/3-us-soldiers-killed-jordan
President Biden is facing calls from congressional hawks to escalate attacks on Iran-linked targets, including within Iran itself, in response to the deaths of three U.S. service members in a drone attack in Jordan.
Senate Minority Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) called for “serious, crippling costs” to Iran, “not only on front-line terrorist proxies, but on their Iranian sponsors who wear American blood as a badge of honor.”
“The only answer to these attacks must be devastating military retaliation against Iran’s terrorist forces, both in Iran and across the Middle East,” said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.). “Anything less will confirm Joe Biden as a coward unworthy of being commander-in-chief.”
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/28/gop-biden-iran-soldier-deaths
Meanwhile, North Korea seems to be preparing for war. Is it a bluff? Opening multiple fronts is a problem.