No, I don’t think it should be mandatory. I wouldn’t demand it be mandatory.Joe Biden, January 2021[i]
Primarily coal industry and oil and gas industry, a lot of smaller players in that industry are going to probably go bankrupt in short order – at least we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change.”Saule Omarova, Biden’s Treasury pick
There are two major totalitarian agendas at work today. One is vaccine mandates (and passports), while the other is climate change. These two agendas are connected, but not as you might imagine. They are connected because the planet is about to experience cooling instead of warming. This cooling will be caused by the Grand Solar Minimum that began last year. Food production will be seriously disrupted by weather, and already has been affected in some regions. In other words, we are headed for a global famine. Humanity is going to suffer a massive die-off. I strongly suspect the pandemic, the vaccine mandates, and the vaccine passports are related to this impending situation.
I quoted Saule Omarova above because she is a walking, talking signpost. She has a thick Russian accent because she was born and raised in the Soviet Union. President Biden has nominated her to be the comptroller of the currency. She has said that she wants to bankrupt the gas and oil industries in order to “tackle climate change.” She wants to nationalize the banking system and impose Soviet-style wage and price controls. Omarova has a degree from Moscow State University where her thesis paper was titled “Karl Marx’s Economic Analysis and the Theory of Revolution in Das Kapital.”
During Senate Banking Committee hearings last Thursday, Senator Pat Toomey characterized Omarova’s ideas as “consistent with the socialist view of a command and control economy…. The idea that we would put a person with these views as the chief regulator of America’s national banks is deeply disturbing and chilling.”[ii] But Senator Toomey is a little late to the game. Our system has long been infiltrated by agents from Russia and China. These two countries are determined to survive the impending crisis. To do so, they must assure that America and Europe fail. They must make sure that we are not going to buy up and eat the food they intend to take control of.
Meanwhile, to advance this agenda, another agenda is unfolding. Vaccine mandates. Our leaders promised us they would not force anyone to take the jab. But they lied. And if Americans want to see what their future holds, they have only to look at Austria. Indeed, the Austrian leaders promised there would be no vaccine mandates. But, of course, they lied. It is all about deception and distraction, until the straight jacket has been securely fastened, and the exits blocked, and the Gestapo put into place. At the end of the process, Omarova will have taken your bank account. You will be given a food ration card, which is also a vaccine card. No vaccine, no food. Of course, some experts think the vaccine may kill you in three years. Or you can starve at home until you break down and take the jab. Are the vaccines really that bad? Well, we know they don’t work. So why force everyone to take them? What is really going on?
Imagine waking up one day to the announcement that you are under a kind of house arrest. The government has decided that everyone must take an unsafe experimental vaccine that does not work. Of course, it is against medical science to vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic, but who cares about science? You are being ordered to take this treatment whether you want it or not, whether it is effective or not, whether it is safe or not. Could this really happen? Yes. It has already happened in Austria. What follows, below, is a translation from the August 11, 2021 press conference of the Chairman of the Austrian Freedom Party, Herbert Kickl. He actually predicted what was going to happen last August; and his remarks apply to every Western country.
Herbert Kickl, Chairman of the Austrian Freedom Party:|
(Horrifyingly Prescient) Press Conference of August 11, 2021.
Video source (German): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8HJl4qbFJk
Complete transcript and subsequent English translation by a concerned citizen:
Well, good morning, ladies and gentlemen! Nice to be able to welcome you once again at a press conference. I’m thanking you so much for the great interest. As you may have noticed, I’ve made myself a bit scarce in recent weeks, as far as appearances like this one are concerned. Yet, I haven’t been idle, but have been around, I might say, throughout Austria, and have sought the contact with the population. I did this in an unorganised and spontaneous manner by simply approaching people directly, somewhat randomly, and I am happy to have succeeded in getting into conversations with many, many people of all age groups and from all walks of life, without blowing this up propagandistically, without showing up at places with a whole entourage of party functionaries, but merely seeking honest conversations and especially doing that which, I think, politics oftentimes falls short of doing: to listen. And I heard quite a lot, which to me is very interesting and which I intend to take as a mandate and legacy for my political work into the late summer and upcoming autumn.
There are many, many worries and concerns in the population. There are a great many straits. There are a whole lot of fears, and also there is desperation. There are many crushed hopes and there is a whole lot of anger, not only, but especially with regard to the Corona measures put in place by the Federal Government. You’ve all seen the veritable announcement orgies that occurred. You’ve seen the strategy of fear mongering imposed on us by the Government over many months. And all that has led to this current situation. And this is also the reason why I would like to discuss this particular topic in this first press conference.
I hope you can see I’m refreshed. I hope you can see I’m healthy – thank God, I want to add. And you might also be able to see, and hear from what I’m saying, that I’m top motivated, after all these conversations that I had, simply because they conveyed a message coming from many, many people with whom I spoke and who very much realise that the Freedom Party is the only political party which they identify as a herald of hope in this extreme stalemate situation and which they understand to be the only ones who are willing to stand up against this across-the-board madness. And that is a good thing. But I’m not just highly motivated as well as healthy, but I also remain being – with a clean conscience, I want to emphasise – unvaccinated against Covid-19; I’m saying this because there have been rumours swirling around that suggested otherwise. No, I’m unvaccinated, which I also intend to continue to be, especially as – or especially because – the vaccine pressure that’s headed towards vaccine mandates is being ever more increased by the authorities.
And this is a fact well known to all of us. Don’t get me wrong: I have no problem with people getting vaccinated. In no way. But what causes me concern and what really is an irresponsible approach on the part of those in charge is when people tell me that they are getting vaccinated, not because they believe it is doing their health any good and will protect them against whatever virus, but when they get vaccinated because they fear facing problems at their work place; because they fear their children might experience mobbing in school as long as they won’t switch the lights to green; because they fear disadvantages in their friendship circle, or because they simply fear to be made into second-class citizens. And therefore I say that I’m unvaccinated with a clean conscience, because I won’t allow anybody, including the Federal Government and its henchmen, to instill such bad conscience in me, and be it remotely. After all, this is part of the strategy that’s now being followed. There is an attempt to make people feel guilty if they decide not to take part in this clinical field experiment, a.k.a. “vaccination”. And so, this is now the renewed version of the “life-threatening and dangerous person”, who so to speak befalls the public, as had been the narrative during the early stages of the Federal Government’s Corona propaganda. I refuse to be made feel guilty in such a way.
And when I speak of vaccine mandates and when I speak of vaccine pressure, this applies then also for the debate around the costs of testing and for those irresponsible initiatives that we can now see, demanding that people should be charged for those tests. There are already such considerations underway in Germany, and also in Austria, federal and regional representatives as well as representatives of so-called opposition parties are headed in that same direction. I consider this to be irresponsible, just as I find it irresponsible and view it as a measure to increasing the vaccine pressure, when there is talk about future lockdowns solely for the unvaccinated. We are living through a situation – which brings me back to the issue of vaccine pressure – where de-facto employment bans are being imposed on people who won’t get vaccinated, and this by far exceeds the boundaries of healthcare, if one listens to the ideas for instance of representatives of the Bioethics Commission, and of course we are also confronted with a situation in the schools, where vaccination pressure is being massively increased, simply because the unvaccinated, according to the suggestions by the Minister of Education, will become second-class students.
All this is happening in Austria, and all this is being promoted from the highest levels of government, and other parties have jumped this band wagon, and I may just refer to the fact that with these developments we can see exactly the result the Freedom Party had been warning against from the outset. We said: By the end of the day, there will only remain the one G [out of the initial 3 Gs as a requirement for across-the-board participation, which stood for (1) Geimpft, meaning vaccinated, (2) Getestet, meaning tested, and (3) Genesen, meaning recovered], and this one G stands for “vaccinated”, and that’s where we have arrived at. “Vaccinated” as the entrance ticket into participating in social life; as the entrance ticket into the labour market; as the entrance ticket into the welfare system; as the entrance ticket, so to speak, into recreational and entertainment activities. And this one G doesn’t mean to be vaccinated once, and that was it, but this one G then means to receive one jab, at first, then to receive a second jab, followed by a third jab, as we know from Mr. Mückstein [Austria’s Minister for Health] beginning with Oct. 17th, and then a fourth and a fifth, because speculations are already going that far. And I recently read in an article that the WHO’s Technical Director, with regard to Covid, is already busy thinking about how all the future variants of the Corona virus should be named once the Greek alphabet runs out of letters, and she took recourse to star constellations! Just so everybody knows where this is headed. This is going to be a never-ending story that we are in, and the vaccination isn’t a one-time act of liberation, but this is leading to a permanent situation, a never-ending story which won’t be broken, unless we break it. And I’m telling you loud and clear that it is the Freedom Party’s goal, in alliance with the Austrian population, to break this never-ending story, to help give the principle of free choice the recognition it deserves and to put an end to this policy of one-dimensional Corona measures. This is the declared goal.
Ladies and gentlemen, what is, after all, the purpose of a vaccination? What is the purpose of a vaccination? And how come the vaccinations of the past – which we are all familiar with – have been relatively well received and widely accepted by the population, and it certainly isn’t the case that I’m not vaccinated against this or that. But that is so because essentially three things are connected with a vaccination. The first thing is a protection against infection and thus against illness for the person who is vaccinated. That’s number one. The second thing is a protection against infecting others. That is the second decisive point. And the third point is: If one receives a vaccination, one can usually be sure that one won’t be harmed by other vaccines, with all probability. And that’s a good thing. The interesting thing, however, is: With this present clinical experiment, that’s based on new vaccination technologies which are being used on a large scale for the first time, none of the above applies any longer. All these three requirements are not being met. And this means nothing else than that Kurz and Mückstein [Austria’s then-Chancellor and Austria’s Minister of Health] and all the rest of them who are administering this on their behalf, in reality have lied to the population: There’s no way that the pandemic is over for the vaccinated; that the vaccinations are a “game-changer”; or that this present summer has turned out to be a summer like in the old days. One only needs to look over to places where vaccination rates are high in order to understand from what direction the wind blows. I’m speaking here of Israel – Israel having been also our Chancellor’s foremost example as for how to deal with the pandemic. Well, what is happening there right now is the empirical refutation of the Austrian government’s propaganda: More than half of the infected are people who are fully vaccinated. Let that sink in! The greater part of those who are hospitalised are people who are vaccinated. And also among the severely ill, we can see a very high percentage of those who are vaccinated. I specifically looked it up in the Israeli press, i.e., in the Jerusalem Post, a couple of days ago, and there was mentioning of 250 severe Covid cases. Out of these 250 severe Covid cases in Israel, 210 were over the age of 60, which corresponds with what is generally referred to as the “high-risk age group”. And of these 210 severely ill over the age of 60, 153 are fully vaccinated and 7 are so to speak in the process of immunisation, albeit not yet fully immunised, as it’s paradoxically called – it’s a paradox because obviously there is no effective immunisation, anyway. This means that the overwhelming part of those who experience severe symptoms are people who are fully vaccinated, and this is no malevolent propaganda by whatever “skeptics” against the Austrian government’s Corona measures, but these are the Israeli hospital statistics, and I really ask myself, as we’ve been told all the while that, ’Well, the groups most in need of protection, the elderly, should be vaccinated first, as there we have the greatest risk,’ and then we see such an outcome, I really wonder: What conclusions does one draw from such an empirical report? The next example is Iceland; again, a country with a high vaccination rate. And the Icelanders got through the pandemic, for the most part, fairly well, and are in the lucky situation that they had, in the course of these past one and a half years, only 30 deaths stemming from or accompanied with Covid-19. But in recent weeks, there’ve been interesting developments there: In the early summer, for weeks, incidence numbers were at zero. And now, all of a sudden, during the last two weeks, from mid July till the beginning of August, we can see incidences gone up to 238, which means an almost twentyfold increase, and we’re now having a situation where during five days in a row, there occurred 100 new infections per day. No wonder that the local epidemiologist, head epidemiologist, the counterpart to his Swedish colleague, explains in no uncertain terms that the last weeks have shown that vaccinated people can easily catch the virus and can easily transmit it, as well. In other words, a clear empirical refutation of everything that has been promised to us with regard to the vaccinations as a “game changer”.
And here one needn’t wonder that in Iceland, half of those hospitalised as Corona patients are vaccinated. And we are not speaking of mild symptoms here as somebody with mild symptoms doesn’t go to the hospital, right? So much about that argument that comes up again and again. I spare you now a view on Britain, which would also be highly enlightening, if one analyses the distribution among those tested positive; because you would find out that everywhere where the Delta variant has been sequenced, you find among the infected 50% who are vaccinated; so, that’s interesting too. And the CDC in America also reaches at similar results; there, they looked at the amount of viral material in the noses and throats of vaccinated infected and couldn’t find a difference to those who are not vaccinated. And now one asks onself: If that is so that the vaccination doesn’t keep the promise made by the politicians, what is the conclusion? What is then the conclusion? And I think the conclusion would have to be a change of strategy, where one would have to realise, at some point, and admit: Possibly we’ve been here on the wrong track. Possibly it is a wrong approach to only want to fight the virus. Perhaps we would be better off if we undertook attempts to strengthen the host. Perhaps this would be a more sensible path. I’m speaking here of preventive measures, I’m speaking here also, of course, about an increased application of drugs and of course about a corresponding support for the research in that direction. The interesting thing is that the reaction is exactly opposite: The vaccination doesn’t deliver what it promises, and the reaction on the part of the system is: Now we must vaccinate all the more! And this, from my point of view, is a paradox; meaning: It can’t get more contradictory than that! But that’s the reaction. The vaccination doesn’t show the results one wanted. And so it is said: Let’s vaccinate all the more and all the more intensively! To me, this is a kick, as it were, in the face of common sense, the way things are being done. And I’m honestly telling you: The whole thing has nothing to do with health policies any more, but we’re dealing here with something completely different; this is about brutal business interests on the part of the pharmaceutical industry, that are being pushed through, and it is about a considerable amount of irresponsibility on the part of those who are at work here politically. Otherwise, we wouldn’t reach at the idea, in line with this broader vaccination approach, to go especially after the children and youth as well. I may in this context point to a study, because it is recent, a joint study by the University Clinics of Freiburg, Heidelberg, Tübingen and Ulm. They looked at hundreds of families, also with children from six to fourteen years old, and analysed the infectious trends over the last couple of months, and they reached at unbelievably encouraging results: They say that the children got infected much, much less frequently than the adults, when there was a family member infected; the children mostly had unsymptomatic histories, meaning they don’t even realise anything, and the children show, and this is the next great advantage, even when they have such asymptomatic histories, a higher count of antibodies than those adults who, in part, were symptomatically ill. This is all unbelievably encouraging news that we have here, and how one can reach at the idea, against this backdrop, to force the children into the needle by all possible means, well, this shall be explained by those who will one day have to answer for this, possibly in court.
Ladies and gentlemen, this takes me to the point I want to make: I intend to nail the Chancellor [Sebastian Kurz, at the time] down on this. He said there will be no forced vaccinations in Austria. Well, what we are experiencing every day, in the most diverse fields, are de-facto forced vaccinations, if only executed indirectly. And I know that the Chancellor [Sebastian Kurz], you know that the Chancellor, public prosecutors know that the Chancellor has a problem with the truth [hinting at ongoing corruption investigations because of which Sebastian Kurz then stepped down in October]. And so, let’s put it to the test: Already a few weeks ago, we sent to the Chancellor a catalogue of demands, a five-point demand, that essentially says that there must not be any vaccination mandate in Austria and that there must not be any repressive measures against the unvaccinated. He simply ignored it. I now go one step further and will, following this press conference, send the Chancellor a document via express courier, courier is already waiting, and it’s a very, very short text, an affidavit, and the text we’re going to send him goes as follows:
I, Sebastian Kurz, declare and affirm as Chancellor of the Republic of Austria in lieu of oath that I guarantee that there will be in Austria neither a direct nor an indirect Covid-vaccination mandate and that unvaccinated persons, no matter which age, must not be subjected to repressions or restrictions of any kind.
That’s the first sentence. And the second sentence is:
Should I break this promise, I will immediately step down.
Very simple indeed. The Chancellor doesn’t need much time for this. These few minutes he will be able to spare from his preparations for the questionings in front of a judge in connection with his false statements. This amount of time he will be able to spare in order to read this declaration through and to sign it. I believe that the Austrian population has a right to get a clear commitment in this regard. We know that one cannot trust his media statements. What’s the problem in signing such a document, and I give him a week’s time to do this and to make it public accordingly on the website of the Chancellory.
Ladies and gentlemen, we will do something else in addition, and this is important to me as well. There was a few days ago a, I want to say, scandalous appearance on a late-night news show on Austrian Broadcasting by a Commissioner on Cults of the Austrian Federal Government. This appearance was scandalous in more than one regard. The discussion was about the number of children deregistered [by their parents] from school, and I believe that the word “scandalous” already applies for the introduction of this segment, this was scripted by Austrian Broadcasting, for this was introduced in such a way that the moderator there said, “Thousands of conspiracy theorists and Covid deniers are taking their children out of the education system at the same time.” This means that a group of responsible parents, who won’t be taken in by the government’s propaganda, is being slandered here collectively; on a public-law television channel that has been obligated to impartiality and objectivity, not by anyone else primarily, but first and foremost by itself. There is, after all, a thing called Content Guidelines [German: ‘Programmrichtlinien’] which the ORF [Austrian Broadcasting], I assume, has given itself, and in these ORF Content Guidelines one can read that the ORF’s presentations and services adress “the diverseness of interests of the entire audience” and that the ORF by its reporting contributes to “the cohesion of the community”. Well, I can see in what was said here the exact opposite. For this reason, we will also, so to speak, contact KommAustria, which is the communication agency in question, because of the breach of the objectivity requirement by the ORF, and file an according complaint. But I also do not want to let the lady who spoke there off the hook. This is the Commissioner on Cults of the Federal Government; and in charge is right now – as Minister Raab, I think, is still on maternity leave – Mrs. Edtstadler, who is, as it were, the supervisory official for this Commissioner on Cults. We will review very conscientiously what exactly this lady was saying on that programme, and we are going to measure this against the backdrop of § 283, which is nothing else than the offence of sedition. And should our law experts come to the conclusion that the lady there stood on the edge of sedition or crossed that line, there will be also an according complaint to the prosecution authorities.
Ladies and gentlemen, finally one more point that is important to me: I would want to address, towards the end of this press conference, also the medical community in Austria. I know from the many conversations that I had, that there, for the great majority – and I’m talking about those medical doctors for whom their occupation isn’t just a profession, but a call – that for all those medical doctors, for this majority, it is completely clear that, despite the pressure that’s being exerted on them, they stand with their patients and with the population, who still have a great deal of confidence in the doctors, a confidence that, as for the politicians in charge, they have lost a long time ago. And these doctors know, also by a great majority, that what the Government and the Medical Association demand from them, and expect of them, namely this uncritical mass processing, which with regard to the vaccinations is supposed to be executed, that this doesn’t go together with their professional ethos and that they are supposed to be used and instrumentalised for things which have not really anything to do with questions of health, but which have much, much more to do with profiteering and with political force. And I think that many of these are also here offering according resistance, and exactly in such a way that they follow their professional ethos and not tar all people and all patients with the same brush. And I want to simply thank them for having stood strong, for being there for the patients, for giving orientation, for providing sensible evaluation and advice, always against the backdrop of the individual patient’s history, and for giving priority to the principle of free choice. And I’m saying this because the medical doctors are the pivotal element in every vaccination campaign. When there are no doctors who vaccinate, the Federal Government can stand on its head in trying to even come after the children. And therefore my plea goes out to these doctors to also exert influence on their colleagues and to accept this inidividual responsibility and not to believe one is a particularly good doctor when one complacently executes that which some out-of-touch, government-paid functionaries of the Medical Association demand from one. And this is, from my perspective, an important plea, which at this point I wanted to get across once again.
Q & A
Christian Maier (?), Servus TV: Three questions. In your statement you mentioned that the tests, or that the discussion is that the tests will cost something or will cost something, beginning with autumn. The fact is also that the vaccination, the progress of the vaccination programme, isn’t really getting ahead, that it is somewhat stagnating. In your view, how can one forestall disadvantages for the unvaccinated, meaning more expensive tests, perhaps again a mask mandate etc., first question. Second question: With regard to East Tyrol, incidences have gone up, there is again an FFP-2 mask mandate, emigration controls; for events for more than 100 persons, people, there are restrictions, meaning prohibitions. In your view, to what extent does the Government react the same way as before, although many experts are saying that incidences should no longer be the guide numbers, it’s rather about what’s happening in the hospitals, and in connection with that: Today, there are 900 cases, 900 infections, how do you see the possibility that there could again come restrictions across Austria like for East Tyrol right now?
Herbert Kickl: Yes, first, how can one prevent disadvantages for those people who have by their own free choice decided that they do not want to get vaccinated? Yes, how can one prevent that? Well, in my view the best way to prevent [such disadvantages] would be to establish a legal framework, a kind of prohibition of discrimination, as it exists in other countries, by simply making it a punishable offence to discriminate against somebody for this reason. As, we have the whole sphere, for example, I’m saying, the public sphere on the federal level, then we have the public sphere on a regional level [“Länderebene”], everything which belongs in that wider field, the public sphere on the communal level, and then we have the whole private sector, where all the labour market difficulties are involved, and beyond that so to speak the participation in the social life. In my view, the ideal solution would be an anti-discrimination law that makes it punishable to put these people at a disadvantage. The second point is, and it’s connected, the question of costs. That’s really going too far when I hear such strange talk, right? ‘Yes please, why should the vaccinated now pay for the tests of the unvaccinated?’ First, I believe, both are, normally, taxpayers, vaccinated and unvaccinated, let’s assume that, to begin with, that this is the case. And also the unvaccinated are paying for the vaccines of those who get vaccinated, or does anybody believe that this was for free what has been purchased so far, and does anybody believe that the 42 million doses that were ordered for the years ’22 and ’23, are a gift from the pharmaceutical industry? I believe one should, with regard to the cost argument, ask a completely different question. The question that arises is: Why should all tax payers, namely vaccinated as well as unvaccinated, provide the pharmaceutical companies with billions in profits by buying from them a product where, as we now know, that which was promised doesn’t really work? This is normally a case for a claim! Such a thing goes back. When I buy something and it isn’t that which was promised to me when I ordered and purchased it, but instead comes something completely different, that this is reason for a claim. Yet, we don’t file a complaint; we order even more, right? Why should the tax payers take part in this whole idiocy, and on top of it: Why should the tax payers – let’s not forget that! – carry the whole liability risks for damages deriving from all this vaccinating, whereby we don’t even know yet what’s lying ahead? Because the pharmaceutical companies have reimbursed themselves here, which amazes me if they are so convinced of the harmlessness of their vaccines! This responsibility, they have passed on to the tax payer. Those are the questions where we are talking about real cost dimensions! With regard to East Tyrol: I can only say: Groundhog Day! It all starts all over again! It all starts all over again, and I expect for the autumn a repetition, maybe with the one or the other new aspect, of everything which we already saw before. The division of society will continue, of course there will again be restrictions, limitations in numbers, possibly mask mandates etc. etc., and it only shows how exchangeable all these things are that are used to introduce it. You are perfectly right: First, it was the incidences, then they changed that and it was the ICU beds, now they’ve returned to the start again and they begin again with incidences. Soon it’ll be again the numbers of hospitalised, and we will again arrive at the beds, and I only say: Still, not one additional intensive care bed has been created in the meantime. And so, we will see the same thing again, we see the Government caught and arrested on that track which they’ve been on ever since they placed themselves there. They don’t get away from this track any more and will lead the country into a disastrous situation of social division which has two winners in all of this: The pharmaceutical industry, which cashes in, which generates billions in profits, Pfizer has basically hit the jackpot, among others; and the other profiteers, that is those in government, because by this division of society they of course have the chance to exert governing control and exert power. Those are the two profiteers. Those on the losing end are the population, that’s the people who believe that by taking part in this whole spectacle, they do something good to their health or can lead a normal life. Both has been a fraud!
Q: You have earlier said that, on the one hand, one should first support the development of medical drugs, that’s a given, and on the other hand, strengthen prevention. Do you have any concrete ideas in this respect, or can you somehow explain what you mean by this?
Herbert Kickl: Well, I think it’s a well-known fact, or has been until the time Corona in the form of Covid-19 made its appearance, that a strengthened immune system basically represents a good protective mechanism against all kinds of viruses. And I don’t know why this knowledge has been brushed aside, so to speak, and one doesn’t take that course where one says: Where can we make adjustments in order to de-facto strengthen the host? And there are many possibilities to this end. There are, you know these things, vitamin compounds, you know the recommendation to work, so to speak, with quite simple things such as bitter compounds; you know the recommendation to go out of the house and move in fresh air; you know the recommendation – and this is a very, very good thing for the immune system, all psychologists will tell you that – to have a regular social contact that is not determined by fear, right? When people experience joy and when people are having a normal exchange with each other, stress levels come down, and this is good for the immune system. All this I mean by the term “prevention”, and probably there are many more things, such as that one shouldn’t again take recourse to such absurd ideas – could come back any time – to prohibit people from moving out in fresh air, that one tries to again lock people up. This is what I mean. And as far as medical drugs are concerned, I know well that the pharmaceutical industry doesn’t like it, but it is cheaper in some areas, where it is applied, and obviously not without success, and then there is another component here, also in Austria, and that’s the research into so-called vaccines of the conventional kind, these inactivated vaccines that exist; this is also something that is, in my opinion, being completely underconsidered, and I believe that one should open things up here and not one-dimensionally bet everything on this new technology and destroy billions, when one now sees that the results are not what has always been promised. As “More of the Same” can hardly be the answer.
Links and Notes
Quartlery Subscription (voluntary)