We adapted a technology whereby individual [ricin] protein molecules are encapsulated within a thin polymer shell, termed nanocapsules. These nanocapsules can effectively enter the cells, owing to the positive charge on their surface and release their [ricin] protein cargo due to the ‘proton-sponge’ effect…. One unique advantage of this nanocapsule platform is its flexibility. By altering the chemical properties of the nanocapsule surface, one can modulate critical factors such as cell surface affinity, immunogenicity, release rates of its cargo, circulation time and biodistribution.”Specific elimination of Latently
HIV-1 Infected Cells Using HIV-1
Protease-Sensitive Toxin Nanocapsules 
The four authors of the above-quoted article are, Yang Liu, Jing Wen, Jie Li and Yiming Xie. I pass over, for the moment, the Chinese ethnicity of the authors. Their study was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The bio-warfare implications of this research should not escape our notice. The article was submitted for publication in November 2015 and published in April 2016 (available in the notes below). The article states that ricin toxin can be wrapped within a nanocapsule and used in non-lethal doses to target specific cells within the body.
If we dare to put on our strategic thinking-caps, we can see that a lethal dose of ricin – or any other toxin – could be placed within a polymer shell just as easily. If such nanocapsules are configured for American vaccines by Chinese companies, what do we have? A potential mass casualty event, perhaps? And the Chinese are, indeed, involved in making vaccine precursors for the U.S. market. In this situation, might they add their own nanocapsule “secret sauce” to the vaccine cocktail? In fact, ricin toxin may not be sufficiently lethal under the circumstances.
Chemists may know best, but the ideal toxin in this scenario might be botulinum toxin, which causes botulism (a rare and serious condition). As far as toxic weapons go, botulinum toxin is inexpensive. The kill mechanism is simple. Botulinum is a neurotoxic protein that prevents the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine from axon endings, resulting in flaccid paralysis. This is a condition in which the muscles of the body progressively lose the ability to contract. The condition becomes fatal when the respiratory muscles fail, resulting in suffocation. Botulinum toxin packs a real punch. Only one nanogram per kilogram of the target person’s weight is needed to kill.
Regarding botulinum toxicity, there is a strange coincidence I discovered in the FDA Fact Sheet on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. One of the side-effects of the vaccine bears a peculiar resemblance to botulism, noted as follows: “Guillain Barré syndrome (a neurological disorder in which the body’s immune system damages nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis) has occurred in some people who have received the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.” On first reading this I was struck by the possibility that there has occurred a misdiagnosis; i.e., that GBS has been mistaken for mild botulism, see note. Coincidentally, Guillain Barré syndrome is identical to the early onset of botulism.
Readers are encouraged to peruse this suggestive July 2018 item: “Guillain-Barré syndrome mimicking botulism in early disease course.” Since the disease (GBS) can mimic botulism, are we seeing early indicators of something in the J&J shot? The item cited above begins with the following sentence: “A 42-year-old man, returning to Europe after a 2-month stay in China, reported cough and runny nose. Five days later, he developed neck discomfort and rapidly evolving weakness, spreading from his arms to the facial, bulbar and face muscles, and then the legs. He developed dysphagia and breathlessness, and was intubated in the emergency department. Cerebrospinal fluid showed mildly elevated protein.”
Did somebody in China use this 42-year-old visitor as an involuntary test subject? Of course, these are questions more suggestive than answerable. But I digress.
Returning to the question of using nanocapsules to deliver a fatal dose of toxin by way of a vaccine: Has anybody bothered to investigate these vaccines or the virus that brought them on? In part, yes. Consider, if you will, the research of Dr. David Martin. In the first four minutes of his interview with Stew Peters, Martin describes the Moderna vaccine as “a computer code uploaded by the Chinese into U.S. manufacturing to inject a pathogen stimulant into the American population.” He does not specifically refer to nanocapsules delivering a fatal toxic dose. He points to the toxicity of the S1 spike proteins produced by the vaccines. The only indication I have found, so far, for the existence of nanocapsules in our COVID-19 vaccines comes from Dr. Robert O. Young, who claims to have studied Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and J&J, under a microscope. If I understand his paper correctly, Young claims to have evidence of nanocapsules/nanoparticles being added to all four vaccines. Is Young credible? It would be nice to have more understanding in this area, but I thought it worth pointing out for others (better versed) to comment on.
David Martin’s Curious Assertions
Quoting from Martin’s interview with Stew Peters published on 20 July 2021, the background of the pandemic bears a peculiar twist: “We have collusion between … interlocking directorates inside of anti-trust law: We have Anthony Fauci at NIAID; we have the Director for the Centers for Disease Control in China; and we have Dr. [Christopher] Elias from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, all sitting on a board, all colluding to actually create, price-fix, and market direct this pandemic.” The collusion which Martin describes began when a group of scientists under Dr. Ralph Baric filed a patent for what they referred to as an “infectious transmision defective form of coronavirus.” According to Martin, this translates as follows:
In 1999 Anthony Fauci wanted to make corona virus a vector for an HIV vaccine. He wanted to use a virus as a vaccine. And, by the way, it sounds as bad as what I just said. It’s actually a bad idea.
What Facui wanted to do, in effect, was take a highly manipulable platform (i.e., the coronavirus), and “chimerically” alter that platform “so that he could get it to target human lung epithelium.” According to Martin, what Dr. Ralph Baric and his team did is “patent a whole bunch of variations of coronavirus which would make it more infectious to humans. And this is where … biological weapons [law] becomes important; because, if you’re building a thing to be more infectious to humans [even if justified for therapeutic use, it is still a weapon].” Martin then asked a pointed rhetorical question: “has there ever been, in the history of humanity, a technology developed under the guise of a ‘good thing’ that was ever used for a bad thing? Or am I just naive thinking that maybe, if you make a natural substance more toxic to humans, that’s actually a bad thing?”
When Stew Peters suggested the corona virus leaked from the Wuhan lab in 2019, Martin interjected his own idea of what happened. “I am the first to suggest to you,” said Martin, “that the same mainstream media that made it illegal to talk about the Wuhan leak … six months ago, and suddenly made it fair game to talk about again, is using a distraction about a leak. This is not about a virus.”
…the story of ‘where did it come from’ is actually a total misdirect. This is not … a virus … but here is the problem: … Nothing started in Wuhan. Nothing. As a matter of fact when you look at those first two weeks of January you see gene sequences that are seemingly uploaded from multiple locations.
Admittedly, I am confused by Martin’s presentation. He describes the virus as being engineered, then he denies the Wuhan outbreak. According to Martin, the first upload of a gene sequence happened in December of 2019 and predates, allegedly, the first patient with COVID-19. When Stew Peters then suggested the virus was merely the pretext for the vaccine, Dr. Martin agreed with him and made the following remark: “If I told you: Stew, it would be great if you just took this [vaccine] treatment because, maybe, one day, a bad actor is going to unleash some sort of … Chimera on us; you would go, ‘Nah, I’m not going to do it.’ And you wouldn’t do it because it would be a dumb idea.”
According to Martin, what Anthony Fauci represents is a dogma. He wants what Martin calls “industrial pharmaceutical management of the entire human population” as the answer. And as it happens, this mad agenda dovetails nicely with the agenda of the People’s Liberation Army bioweapons establishment. This is very curious, indeed, since the first Chinese publication on the Wuhan outbreak, submitted at the beginning of January last year, stated: “By January 2nd, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory confirmed 2019 COVID infection.” The problem with this statement, alleged Martin, was that the virus was not isolated until the following week. Martin then asked, “How do you have laboratory confirmation of a thing that doesn’t exist? What time machine would be required?”
The outrageous suggestion, of course, is that an unprecedented “pandemic” hoax was staged as only the Chinese communists could have staged it (with the collusion of Dr. Fauci and others in the United States). The Chinese communists were, after all, the best equipped to start the ball rolling. A totalitarian state controls its people, controls everything society does. So the question arises: Did China fake the Wuhan outbreak? If the outbreak in Wuhan was not COVID-19, then what was it? Or have I misunderstood Martin’s claim that “Nothing started in Wuhan”?
Martin said that he likes “to stay in the fact pattern.” But at the 23:30 minute mark of the Stew Peters interview, he offered an uncharacteristic guess as to what is going on. “This is Dave’s hypothesis,” said Martin, referring to himself in the third person:
If you are going to soften the battlefield, if you are going to weaken an opponent, wouldn’t it be great if you could get the military in your opponent’s country to be the front line of injecting soldiers so that they become incapacitated? Wouldn’t it be a great idea to use our own laws, which turn our men and women in uniform into guinea pigs for industrial pharmaceutical abuse?
I am shocked to see that Martin’s “hypothesis” is rather close to my own. If Martin blames Fauci and Big Pharma as corrupt and bungling, he nonetheless points to China as the ultimate grim reaper. “God forbid, if there was ever a need to defend this country, wouldn’t it be great to know that you have actually injected a primer into the entirety of the military complex?” When Stew objected, by saying the goal was to inject everyone on the planet, Martin responded by saying the American military is necessarily the first target. It makes great sense, he added, that an opponent would upload a toxin “into the injection.”
Peters then offered an intriguing summation which may or may not be correct: “The entire program has been about [injecting] … a Chinese source computer simulated pathogen into the global population [under] the guise of a pandemic….” Here we see that Peters was actually describing a biological attack by the Chinese. Or have I missed something? There is a degree of unclarity when Peters talks about “globalists” wanting to “inject everyone.” But the vaccines used in the West are not used in China, or Russia, or Cuba, or any of the other “former” communist bloc nations that stand against the West today. Given this, Mr. Peters’s summation oddly affirms what this blog has argued; namely, that China has long intended to launch a biological attack on the United States, as outlined by General Chi Haotian in his secret speech.
Near the beginning of the Peters interview, Martin has his own way of describing the “vaccine” injection regime: “People think that part of a SARS-Coronavirus was turned into a vaccine. That is not true. A computer simulated synthetic, chimeric, computer-generated code, uploaded by the Chinese in January, was given to Moderna to put into an injection, so that your cells, in the case of the mRNA vaccines … would produce the S1 spike protein synthesis, not the actual virus….”
It was all done, claimed Martin, “to inject a pathogen stimulant into the American people.” Martin added that the officials responsible for this are “criminals.” He also pointed to the veterinarian who said the pandemic started “with a bat in China.” Martin also refered to erstwhile zoologist Peter Daszak, if anyone remembers, who joined with 27 other “scientists” to sign a statement of “solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China.”
We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus.
In working out this statement, Daszak reportedly emailed two scientists, including the aforementioned Dr. Ralph Baric who had advanced Fauci’s project in Wuhan with the Chinese. Daszak also thanked Anthony Fauci for “publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” We now know all of this was a lie. But what kind of lie?
Every fact is only understood, in full, when the analyst has connected all the dots. As little as I know about biology, the case has more to do with Chinese grand strategy and secret police methods. I do not believe that Dr. David Martin has connected all the dots, but he has come across more than a few interesting insights. Before we can understand all this correctly, however, we must have clarity about the major players (i.e, the big powers). This is not easy for someone in Martin’s line of work. I am puzzled by Martin’s assertion that there was no COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan (or have I misunderstood him?) My question would be: What, then, has been making people sick? The problem with anyone who analyzes facts today, is that of forming a consistent and coherent whole. And though he is not a strategist, or an analyst of China or communism, Martin’s dots may be a fair point of departure for our own analysis.
Martin says that he cannot comment on what the injections will do because he does not know what is in the “vaccines.” He says, quite correctly, that we are not actually looking at vaccines. The “vaccine” product is anything but transparent. They do not prevent infection. They do not prevent the spread of the virus. We can all see this, now. In fact, of the many people I personally know who have been “vaccinated,” most have contracted COVID-19. So the “vaccine” itself is a hoax. For what purpose? For whose benefit?
I object to the idea that this is primarily about money. Perhaps that is the motive of secondary or tertiary players. I do not believe that money was the motive of those who set all this in motion. Genocidal crimes may include financial incentives, but there are larger issues involved. The perpetrators could not hope to survive their crimes if they were only after money. Hacks or stooges might be manipulated by paltry monetary incentives, but not PLA generals or strategists aiming at global hegemony.
The domestic perpetrators of this fiasco, as stooges of China, are going to hang like the Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, or they will die when our country is overwhelmed by the Red Chinese invaders. There is no two ways about it. They are shortsighted dupes who have unwittingly cut their own throats. As with the fiasco in Afghanistan, these people belong to a treasonous cabal. Nothing they do is honest. Nothing they do is actually intelligent.
Links and Notes
(1) Ricin is a carbohydrate-binding protein produced in the seeds of the castor oil plant. The median lethal dose for a mouse is around 22 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. The lethal dose for humans is 1 milligram per kilogram of body weight. The kill mechanism involves interference with protein synthesis, preventing cells from assembling various amino acids into proteins. More than twenty years ago I interviewed a man who was suffering from symptoms consistent with ricin poisoning. He was tested for poisoning at a major medical center. They said that they did not have the means to test for ricin poisoning, that he should get away from his girlfriend who had been identified as a spy working for an East European intelligence service. He had discovered that she was engaged in multiple romances with American officials in various agencies (i.e., USAF Intelligence, the DEA and defense contracting).
(2) Note: One thought regarding Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) in patients injected with the CoV-19 Johnson & Johnson vaccine, is that some other toxin may be accidentally released in the body of the patient after injection (a small portion of a larger dose which is held within the nanocapsules). I ask the question: Is GBS in these cases a misdiagnosis? Is the cause from premature release of botulinum toxin? I ask these and other “stupid” questions because there is no harm in asking.
(3) Dr. Robert O. Young, “Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines [Note: I cannot comment on the credibility of Dr. Robert O. Young, whose theories on viruses directly contradict mainstream science. Readers are encouraged to investigate his ideas and make your own evaluations. Young claims to have examined samples of the four vaccines under various magnifications. Is this study valid? I welcome comments. This is the only article I could find which suggests all four of the major CoV-19 vaccines contain nanocapsules which may house unspecified contents.]
(4) “Specific Elimination of Latently HIV-1 Infected Cells Using HIV-1 Protease-Sensitive Toxin Nanocapsules”
(5) Stew Peters TV interviews Dr. David Martin – Stew Peters: Interview With Dr. David Martin Where He Makes Explosive Claims Of ‘Patented Genocide’ (bitchute.com)
(6) In 2015 Dr. Ralph Baric, together with Dr. Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, published an article titled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,” affirming their attempts to generate “a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHCO14 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone.” See, especially, https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
(7) Website of Dr. David Martin: David Martin | The Wobble Effect | Putting Humanity Back into Humans – Quite unusual, including what appears to be a self-help book against self-help.
Quarterly Subscription (Voluntary)