His life … is a piece of the everlasting heart of Nature herself: all men’s life is, – but [the] weak [who are] many know not the fact, and are untrue to it, in most times; the strong few are strong, heroic, perennial, because it cannot be hidden from them.

Thomas Carlyle

The hero is concerned with seeing. The villain is merely concerned with the manipulation of appearances. What an accomplishment it is, indeed, to see behind the foliage of “appearances.” Truth has its camouflage, its bodyguard of lies (if Churchill’s paradox is admitted). Truth is also a moving target, and a living thing, said Plato; never wholly captured by men even in animated discourse. On the other hand, a lie needs no discourse at all; for repetition is not discourse. Being easier than truth, a lie prevails with those who want everything to be easy. This is why modernity prefers “experts.” As Socrates once said of experts, “They will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome, having the reputation of knowledge without the reality.”[i]

The German idealist-turned-political realist Johann Gottlieb Fichte once delivered a lecture on the scholarly search for truth. In accordance with his Transcendental Philosophy, Fichte declared that everything about the “solid” world of perceived things is misleading. Scholars still argue over Fichte’s meaning; but if we consider the problem of “Truth” for a moment, we discover how very thorny it is. After all, once we consult our need, our sense of loss or entitlement – or how unfair the world is – we lose sight of the truth altogether. Our self-pity, our cowardice, our want of backbone, indeed, transforms us and deforms us. What becomes of “seeing,” then? To look with a needy eye is not seeing. To look with a power-hungry eye is to reduce everyone to prey and everything to cynicism. To see the truth requires faith, acceptance, grace, and humility. The truth, then, is very far from us.

Where might we find the truth, then?

If we stopped and listened, we might hear the voice of God in the wind passing through the trees. And then, if we are faithful, we might distill a little truth from the sound. It is much easier to apply to that inverted world Thomas Carlyle warned us about; that is, a world ruled by small men – in fact, the smallest men the world has ever seen, encumbered by small ideas, mean ideas, false ideas. Welcome to the world of bureaucratic socialism, the managed economy, and the one-party state. Here is a land sunk as Atlantis was sunk, but not under water. Instead, it is a land drowning in lies. Oh yes, to those with a tin ear it all sounds wonderful. Everyone will be equal under socialism. Poverty and war will be eliminated under socialism. And yet, the GREAT socialists included Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot – the greatest mass murderers of history. How do we explain it? Shall we make excuses for them? Shall we say that socialism had nothing to do with their crimes?

Where are today’s small ideas, mean ideas, false ideas taking us? To the Devil. Always to the Devil. – without turning around or stopping. Straight to the Devil. All our “instincts” now boil down to a self-destructive impulse – as if we cannot help ourselves. Think, for a moment, about the pandemic. It is the surface phenomenon beneath which the discarded TRUTH peaks out from a landscape that is soon to be moonscape. It is not safe for THE TRUTH to emerge at present. The rotter, the panderer, the climber, the false men are now in charge. These are to the right of us, to the left of us, in front of us, and behind us. We live in the Valley of the Shadow of Evil Imbeciles. What is the name of that Marine Corps general, that Army and Air Force colonel, who threaten their troops to take the jab? My plan would be to name and shame them. First, on this small website, then on larger websites, and finally with their faces plastered on billboards and looking out through bars. Oh yes, in the days ahead, in our endless November of criminals, there will be an accounting. There will be a sifting and weighing. The Nuremburg Code will be applied to those who have illegally forced worthless vaccines on people who could not quit their jobs. Either the law is revived and a day of reckoning comes or we are finished.

Everyone knows that President Pant-Load has already outlived his shelf-life. With the fiasco in Afghanistan and the vaccine mandates, he represents Nietzsche’s Last Man in the role of Last President. After him comes the Last Woman, that socialist ogress who waits her inevitable turn. Then comes feminism’s Waterloo. Oh, the ambition of it! Nothing could be more obvious: Harris is doomed. She is not yet president, but already she is the most hated prospective president in history. Meanwhile, the Party of break-the-bank pandering is less and less solvent, more and more ridiculous, with each passing week. If next year’s election is dishonestly played, or if the public wittingly marches into socialism, make your peace with God. Mars will begin his reign.

The American Establishment is much like the European Establishment: a hierarchy of imposters and unwitting suicides. As they kill their country, they kill themselves. They know only one thing. Pretense. To bring it all down to one issue: The Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier has said that it is an historic blunder to vaccinate during a pandemic. He said, “It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake.”[ii] He said that the vaccination program, which certainly includes government mandated vaccinations, is “unthinkable” because it is killing people. “The new variants,” he said, “result from the vaccination. You see it in each country … in every country deaths follow vaccination.” Here is a golden nugget of truth from an actual scientist. The pandemic will continue, the world economy will crumble. Wars, civil wars, world wars, etc. Should we say that Luc Montagnier is an ignoramus? No. He is not. But the Establishment ignores him, marginalizes him, etc. What is signified by this? The suicide of the elites. As for science itself — what is science, then, if political frauds can marginalize a Nobel Laureate? And if the Nobel laureate is a fraud, then official science is a fraud. But paradox of paradoxes, if the Nobel laureate is telling the truth, official science is still a fraud. That is the long and short of it!

Meanwhile the Chinese and Russians are gathering their forces. They are rubbing their hands in anticipation. The West is falling apart. The American idiots are even using vaccine mandates to drive their best pilots out of the Air Force. They are recasting their military as an organization of men who will follow any order, however illegal. If soldiers will stick poison in their own veins, they will commit any atrocity. Watch. The fake heroes of the Joint Chiefs now congratulate themselves. They are giving U.S. military personnel a toxic spike protein intravenously. Such an experiment has never been tried in all history. But here we are. Blood clotting maybe? Organ damage? How dangerous? Nobody really knows. The generals, of course, are congratulating themselves. Which one has stood up for the troops? Is there one leader among them? To obey and facilitate the poisoning of their own troops is a special distinction. Shall we give them a medal? What to call such a medal? The Spineless Blackguard with Poison Oak Clusters?

The biographer of Marx, Lenin and Hitler – Robert Payne – was also the biographer of that architect of “Retreat from Victory,” General George C. Marshall. Aside from saying many stupid things about Marshall, Payne had one insightful passage: “If the modern general is almost superhuman, he is also – far more often than he suspects – less than human. The historian concerned with the career of Marshall inevitably finds himself reading the autobiographies of the lesser generals. They are not always pleasant reading.”

We can see that nothing has changed in this regard since World War II. Payne added, “General Bradley boasted frankly of his successes, but he had little to say about the disaster in the Ardennes which resulted in fifty-nine thousand American casualties, a disaster which was due to his own failure in tactics.” Modern Americans tend to think poorly of the Carthaginians for crucifying their bad generals. Americans should probably reconsider. One might ask where all our Great Men have gone. When was the last time we had a truly Great Man to lead us? Would we even recognize a Great Man today? It is worthwhile, in this context, to quote Carlyle’s poignant summation: “But of a Great Man especially, of him I will venture to assert that it is incredible he should have been other than true. It seems to me the primary foundation of him….” Carlyle further argued that the Great Man is “what I call a sincere man. I should say sincerity, a deep, great, genuine sincerity, is the first characteristic of all men in any way heroic.” Carlyle added that the Great Man “cannot help being sincere! The great Fact of Existence is great to him. Fly as he will, he cannot get out of the awful presence of this Reality. His mind is so made … first of all. Fearful and wonderful, real as Life, real as Death, is this Universe to him. Though all men should forget its truth, and walk in a vain show, he cannot.”

Nobody who reads Carlyle will ever think of Mark Milly or Lloyd Austin as sincere or true. These men are on a path to nowhere because there is no truth in them. As Carlyle said, “In every kind there is genuine and spurious.” Biden is spurious, Austin is spurious, Milly is spurious. Most of our leaders, in fact, are spurious. Carlyle tells us the inspired is, “in fact, the highest.” People like Biden and Austin and Milly, who support political correctness, are among the lowest of the low. They are men of dry straw, lacking what Carlyle defined as “originality,” “sincerity,” “genius,” etc. The true hero “is he who lives in the inward sphere of things, in the True, Divine and Eternal, which exists always, unseen to most….”[iii]

[i] Plato, Phaedrus.

[ii] Mass vaccination during pandemic a historic blunder: Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier (msn.com)

[iii] Thomas Carlyle, On Heroes and Hero Worship and the Heroic in History (Kindle).


Quarterly Subscription (voluntary)



111 thoughts on “The Heroic Path vs. the Path to Nowhere

  1. In precisely this context of decline and disintegration, I made an unexpected discovery two weeks ago. I was listening, on YouTube, to a number of songs by probably the leading singer-songwriter/chanconnier in the German-speaking sphere, Reinhard Mey, who is now near-79 years old, but still active and the same ingenious and inspired poet he has ever been (I recently posted in these comments his 1972 piece titled, “Gute Nacht Freunde”, which has some strange, symbolic undertones as well).

    But what I finally found was a song, or macabre ballad, Reinhard Mey released in May 1998 (the exact year Mr. Nyquist published his grim, prophetic book, Origins of the Fourth World War). The song is simply titled, “Das Narrenschiff” (Ship of Fools), and despite his heavy criticism of the then-outgoing government under Helmut Kohl (and by extension, Germany’s whole political class) and even some polemics against former hard leftists who had become “lame”, although Reinhard Mey always was much more the American type (with strong French cultural influences) than your usual German leftwinger, he nevertheless paints in this song a truly apocalyptic picture that just doesn’t fully fit the situation of 1998. Instead, he seemingly foresaw the nightmare we’re in right now! True poets can indeed sometimes see into the future!

    Below is a precise English translation I did of the German lyrics. The original rhyme form hasn’t been kept, sorry about that. At the end is a clip from a live performance of the song by Reinhard Mey:

    The temperature drops, a storm is brewing,
    Just stupid giggle and scolding from the conning tower,
    And a dull and grinding sound from the machines.
    And rolling and pitching and heavy seas,
    The music band plays “Humba Tätärä”
    And crazy laughter comes from the latrine.
    The cargo is phony, the papers are fake,
    The bilge pumps are leaking, the bulkheads are jammed.
    The hatches wide open, all alarm bells ring.
    The sea is flooding man-high the stowage,
    St. Elmo’s fire flickering from the derrick,
    Yet, no one on board can interpret the signs!

    The helmsman is lying, the captain is drunk,
    The engineer sunk into numb lethargy.
    The crew, a bunch of perjurious rascals,
    The radioman too craven to put out a distress call.
    Klabautermann leads the ship of fools,
    Full speed ahead and on course for the reef.

    On the horizon glow the signs of the times,
    Malice and greed and vanity.
    The bridge populated with boobies and simpletons.
    In the muddy waters is fishing the sharp-toothed shark,
    Lands his catch, evading taxes,
    On the sandy shores of that notorious treasure island.
    The other pimps and money launderers waiting on the sidelines.
    Brothel czar, gaming machine baron,
    In broad daylight, nobody needs to hide in the dark
    In the banana republic where even the president
    Has shed all inhibitions and knows no scruples
    In decorating himself with the tax thief in his entourage.

    The helmsman is lying, the captain is drunk,
    The engineer sunk into numb lethargy.
    The crew, a bunch of perjurious rascals,
    The radioman too craven to put out a distress call.
    Klabautermann leads the ship of fools,
    Full speed ahead and on course for the reef.

    One’s gotten smooth and come to terms with things,
    All high-flying ideals lie in shambles,
    And the great rebel who never tired to fight,
    Has turned into a servile and poisonous gnome,
    Singing, like a lamb, before the evil old man in Rome.
    His songs, verily: The times are changing!
    The young and wild of yesteryear are now compliant, pious, tame,
    Bought off, narcotised and lame,
    Exchanging their former sharpéned claws for velvet paws.
    And vain old men boldly present themselves on deck
    With women always much too young,
    Who warm up their slack limbs and masticate their food for them.

    The helmsman is lying, the captain is drunk,
    The engineer sunk into numb lethargy.
    The crew, a bunch of perjurious rascals,
    The radioman too craven to put out a distress call.
    Klabautermann leads the ship of fools,
    Full speed ahead and on course for the reef.

    They arm against the enemy, yet the enemy’s already here.
    He’s got his hands around your neck, standing right behind you!
    Protected by paragraphs, he is shuffling the staked deck of cards.
    Everyone can see it, but all look the other way,
    And the obscurantist comes out of his hiding
    And openly sells drugs in front of the kindergarten.
    The lookout calls from the top of the mast: End times ahead!
    Yet, like petrified, they won’t hear him.
    They march like lemmings as spineless hordes,
    It looks as if all had lost their minds,
    Conspiring in demise and decay,
    And a hinky-punk’s become their beacon fire.

    The helmsman is lying, the captain is drunk,
    The engineer sunk into numb lethargy.
    The crew, a bunch of perjurious rascals,
    The radioman too craven to put out a distress call.
    Klabautermann leads the ship of fools,
    Full speed ahead and on course for the reef.

  2. Another outstanding post! I would refer readers to another quote from a poem used by W.S. Churchill in a speech he delivered to the House of Commons – long remembered by me from my undergraduate days.

    Churchill wrote in his memoirs that Parliament’s feebleness reminded him of a poem that he read by Edward Milliken in Punch magazine from its October 4, 1890 edition about a tragic railway accident.

    The poem in its entirety is below.

    Who is in charge of the clattering train?
    The axles creak, and the couplings strain.
    Ten minutes behind at the Junction. Yes!
    And we’re twenty now to the bad—no less!
    At every mile we a minute must gain!
    Who is in charge of the clattering train?

    Why, flesh and blood, as a matter of course!
    You may talk of iron, and prate of force;
    But, after all, and do what you can….
    Man is in charge of the thundering train!

    Man, in the shape of a modest chap
    In fustian trousers and greasy cap;
    A trifle stolid, and something gruff,
    Yet, though unpolished, of sturdy stuff….

    Only a Man, but away at his back,
    In a dozen cars, on the steely track,
    A hundred passengers place their trust
    In this fellow of fustian, grease, and dust….

    The hiss of steam-spurts athwart the dark.
    Lull them to confident drowsiness. Hark!
    What is that sound? ‘Tis the stertorous breath
    Of a slumbering man—and it smacks of death!
    Full sixteen hours of continuous toil
    Midst the fume of sulphur, the reek of oil,
    Have told their tale on the man’s tired brain,
    And Death is in charge of the clattering train!

    Those poppy-fingers his head incline
    Lower, lower, in slumber’s trance;
    The shadows fleet, and the gas-gleams dance
    Faster, faster in mazy flight,
    As the engine flashes across the night.
    Mortal muscle and human nerve
    Cheap to purchase, and stout to serve.
    Strained too fiercely will faint and swerve.
    Over-weighted, and underpaid,
    This human tool of exploiting Trade,
    Though tougher than leather, tenser than steel.
    Fails at last, for his senses reel,
    His nerves collapse, and, with sleep-sealed eyes,
    Prone and helpless a log he lies!
    A hundred hearts beat placidly on,
    Unwitting they that their warder’s gone;
    A hundred lips are babbling blithe,
    Some seconds hence they in pain may writhe.
    For the pace is hot, and the points are near,
    And Sleep hath deadened the driver’s ear;
    And signals flash through the night in vain.
    Death is in charge of the clattering train!

  3. “The true hero “is he who lives in the inward sphere of things, in the True, Divine and Eternal, which exists always, unseen to most….” Good word Jeff.

    The true LIONS of our day are those who “live and move and have our being in God.” Acts 17:28 They do not fear evil, but fear God lest they fail to stand up against the evil. God gives the heroes of our times the courage and confidence to be the true lions of our time in order to help others to stand against the evil in the evil day.

  4. Could have quotes Emanuel Kant, Musashi and Otto Weininger amongst others, regarding the genius who has memory of all times and thus is not acting in the times. Meanwhile the dictator is with the rabble, and the prostitute is his wife, ever so dependent, nay, enslaved on the times, he completely avoids thought and genius as it would make him hesitant in his Nietschean will to power – genius being will to eternity and everlasting values set in stone and platinum.

    This is why the dictator is so neurotically dependent on Political Correctness. He cannot live outside the times he is in.

      1. @JRNyquist: Initially, I thought that Twitter might have censored you; so many Conservative and other right-leaning commentators are being banned from Twitter at this time.

  5. The precision of language is a beautiful thing. It instills clarity and laser focus. Few are as adept as Mr. Nyquist. My admiration and appreciation to you.

  6. I really try to imagine what you’d be saying if a year ago we didn’t start using vaccines and the original virus had run unimpeded through America. My guess is you’d be decrying all the “experts” who advised against deploying a cheap and effective treatment as early as possible. Your entire shtick is based on supposed 20/20 hindsight that only you have. If only we’d listened to Mr. Nyquist! We wouldn’t be better off necessarily, but we’d certainly know who to string up for ruining everything! You quote Plato’s take condemning experts when the “experts” of his time were immeasurably ignorant compared to today. As if ignoring the insight of experts is what has brought society to its current hilt. Condemning experts is just the fastest and easiest way to claim that the “Godly” simpleton is who we should all strive to be. That way, “experts” like Mr. Nyquist here will be looked up to and praised as profound.

    1. Radiofort: your snide remarks concerning Jeff Nyquist miss the mark. There were experts over a year ago actively treating patients effectively with inexpensive, safe, proven treatments, who were sidelined in favor of expensive and ineffective “vaccines”. I knew about the safe and proven treatments as early as late spring 2020 and I told the people around me about them.

      Even though I’m not an expert, when I read in late 2020 that the “vaccines” contain mRNA, that was an immediate red flag that they are dangerous. I had studied genetics. The idea of putting what is in all intents and purposes a virus, that acts like a virus by taking over the protein making machinery of the cell, is something that no sane, thinking person should want to do. Meanwhile, I already have natural immunity.

      I have two sisters who listened to me, as well as my nonagenarian mother, and we all refuse the “vaccines”. My mother also has natural immunity.

      I don’t know how much Jeff Nyquist knew when I learned the above facts. Everything I learned was out in public, published information by recognized experts, true experts. Experts out in the field treating patients, saving their lives, not funding gain of function research in a PLA run lab in China.

      As for the “experts” that you reference above, they murdered people with their deliberate medical malpractice.

    2. Actually, Jeff takes flack for not offering solutions. He raises fair questions, and has interviewed good sources. My biggest criticism is that he tries to find evidence to support his hypothesis, sans the Scientific Method, the rules for legal evidence, or even the standards of professional journalism, which requires three, independent sources who provide the same eye witness account. Nonetheless, he insists that he’s not a conspiracy theorist, the likes of which he as utter contempt, even if they really aren’t conspiracy theorists.

      The Russian and China threat is to be taken seriously, and it goes greatly under reported. JR Nyquist shines a light on the subject and in great detail, as a credible editorial commentator, if not quite an investigative journalist. His biggest strength is that he truly is a fine writer.

    3. I hope Jeff will just remove this ignorant reply. It really doesn’t deserve a moment of time or thought

      1. Take Vlad the Pilgrim, for instance. A very, bright fellow. He would write subtle, lengthy comments with fallacious assertions, blended with sound reasoning. Quite interesting and time consuming, yet bogus. Jeff nuked him. I mean, it was all debatable. When we stoop to the level of censorship, we have lost freedom. Nevertheless, who has time for the distraction? A true dilemma.

    4. Radiofort: The vaccines do not work. Furthermore, it is dangerous to vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic. Experts have said this all along. Experts actually predicted the vaccines would not work. And now we see those experts were right. And by the way, there has never been a successful SARS vaccine. And the new ones are not successful either. Big surprise. Your problem is lack of discernment. You cannot tell true from false, careful thought from empty slogans. Why are you so clueless?

      1. The vast majority of people hospitalized or dead from the virus are unvaccinated. This is what the data says. Go ahead and call me clueless when the numbers are what they are. The vaccines work in crippling the virus. And because the technology they use is relatively new, for the next who-knows-how-long, you all will be carefully expecting the hundreds of millions of vaccinated people to keel over and die while the world moves forward. Only time can tear you from your delusions, but that probably won’t even work. Only an apocalyptic prophecy will satisfy the readers here, however self-fulfilling it is.

      2. Not true. The vaccines do not prevent people from getting and spreading the virus, and only offers limited protection against specific strains (that will soon be replaced by new strains). The virus has now mutated again and again. The vaccines contain the spike protein which is toxic, and that is definitely being put in People’s bodies — doing real harm that may or may not serve the person’s long-term health prospects. We do not know what endlessly repeated vaccinations will do over time. Yet, there is no way to stop vaccinating those who are losing immunity and require a booster. Are they caught in a vaccine trap? Can they ever stop taking injections that repeatedly expose them to damaging effects again and again? This is bad in its face. Yet you lack the common sense to see it. So why are you taking the vaccine? The virus is already so different you are getting almost zero protection if any protection at all. Your natural immune system reacts to more than twenty proteins in the virus. The vaccine reacts to one, which has already changed in some of the new strains. The process itself is stupid. You are fooling yourself. And you are playing Russian Roulette with your health. Nobody knows what the long-term effects of the vaccination are. You do not know. I do not know. Why gamble with your health with a product that we know has serious flaws and risks? And stop gaslighting us with this nonsense about protection. Of the people I know, the vaccinated have had more COVID infections than the unvaccinated. I have one friend who has been seriously ill for several weeks after being vaccinated, another has severe neurological symptoms. I have said nothing about apocalyptic prophecies, so please do not lie about my position. This should be about science. But for you it is clearly about Politucs. Why?

    5. To radiofort,you are a fool who considers yourself immeasurably superior to others because you are a disgusting infidel pig who can’t understand something as basic as the fact that from nothing comes nothing. Plato & Aristotle already confounded you infidels 23 centuries ago. Go on believing in your “experts”, paid stooges who parrot whatever their masters order them to say, & see what it gets you. These inerrant oracles surely have your best interests at heart you vile little socialist cockroach ha ha ha!

  7. “Truth has its camouflage.”
    “Truth is also a moving target, and a living thing.”

    Tear off your mask and strap on your sidearm.

    “Where might we find the truth, then?”

    The King James Version.

      1. Genetic engineering went on before the Great Flood. Noah was perfect in his generations. His family had not been descended from fallen angels and women. In the End Times, this will happen again. Signs of the times are plagues, among other things. Sorrows translates as birth pangs. Earth changes, societal and political unrest, have always occurred, but not simultaneously, more and more frequently, with greater and greater intensity, as a woman in labor before giving birth.




      2. There is a great deal of speculation in what you say. The concept “genetic engineering” does not exist in the Old or New Testament. One should be careful not to add things that are not in the original.

      3. “Genetic engineering went on before the Great Flood”. I feel very sorry for Jeff for having to deal with these types of comments. This is beyond brain dead.

      4. The Bible does not comment on vaccines, but Proverbs has a wonderful quote to apply to for your outstanding essay. When the Godly rule, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people groan. And in an earlier Proverb, it’s similar except that, it adds “When the wicked are in authority, the people go into hiding.”

        Wisdom well written is to be treasured. Thank you, Jeff.

        When we see such un-Godly people in power, we must tremble. Don’t forget what Thomas Jefferson said, “The God who gave us life, gave us Liberty. Can the Liberties of a Nation thought to be secure when we have removed the conviction that these Liberties are the gift of God?” This quote goes on but it is inscribed in the Jefferson memorial.

      5. Yes, I think you are right. This sort of thing is obsessing people. I have tried to read some of these interpretations of old Biblical passages; but all is entertainment, speculation, sensation. Nothing solid. No nutrition. I tried to read the Book of Enoch, for example. Oh my! Angels mating with people! Taking wives! What could this refer to? And why do they take only women and not men? Are there no female angels? Either we are confronted with an absurdity or the backstory is entirely missing. Is this Book of Enoch an invention or a misunderstanding? Given the time it was written, when many religious fabrications were then being set down in old Alexandria, who can say whether it has any truth in it at all. How can one tell? And these modern interpreters, with all their sensationalist claims, make me a little uneasy because their usual game is 90 percent reconstructive fiction and 10 percent speculative scholarship. They build a skyscraper out of match sticks. They do not tell us about the ancient world and its many religious fabrications, cults, idolatries, fancies and myths. The older Biblical scholars and experts in ancient languages make it a little more credible in terms of races marked for extermination, giants who escaped the Flood, etc., but even so, it gets pretty close to bad science fiction as it goes on; or, simply, it is a long lost justification for genocide. How did those awful giants escape the Flood, after all? Goliath and his brothers were descendants of these folks. So then, it was not just Noah who survived the Flood? How confounding! But again, it is a justification for geocoding certain people. If this does not occur to the reader, then the reader is not thinking about the material at hand. One does not like to know how a sausage is made, because you might lose your appetite for sausages. Do we dare to know how these old texts were made? —what political motives might have been involved? Many old legends and stories were invented, borrowed or outright copied from sources we have no access to. We really do not have a clear understanding of pre-history (i.e., anything before Herodotus). The further back you go, the more of a muddle it is. I have tried to get a clearer picture by reading. But nothing is known for certain. I have not found anyone who has put things together in a truly coherent way. You end up in mythic time, wondering at stories that are clearly allegorical — coded, mysterious, etc. I am not persuaded by the supposed translations of ancient cuneiform made by Zachariah Sitchen, for example. His “Lost Book of Enki” is seconded by no other scholar of ancient Sumerian. His text reads, AGAIN, like bad science fiction. But he sold millions of books in that 12th Planet saga! If one has no scruples, great wealth and fame awaits. But alas. Nothing can be found to corroborate this heady fiction outside the misrepresentations of Erich von Daniken, who set the genre on. Perhaps there is something there, as a few of von Daniken’s references are interesting; but none of his speculations are proved by anything substantial (so far). The closer you look, the more the “evidence” turns to dust in your hands. What happened before the flood? We do not have a reliable history. We have a few lines in Genesis, which tell us next to nothing. “Destroy all the souls addicted to dalliance,” says the Book of Enoch, “and all the offspring of the Watchers, for they have tyrannized over mankind. Let every oppressor perish from the face of the earth; let every evil work be destroyed….” All suggestive, all curious, including Enoch’s conversation with “God.” All very colorful. None of it is rationally understandable, however. How can spiritual beings mate with humans? If these beings are physical, and not human, how could human offspring come by them? Here we find absurdity on top of absurdity. Was humanity redeemed by the Flood? What, then, was the Tower of Babel? Spiritual allegory or pre-Fortean insight? We cannot know. Yet people are dragging this sort of thing into current events, distracting from our desperate situation of the moment, as if it gives us some degree of insight. I think, instead, it flatters and titillates. I think it tickles the ears of the empty-headed. Humans crave fantasy and despise reality. They court confusion and eschew clarity. The beginning of time is wrapped in mystery, and so is the end of time. Shall we leave it there? People are obsessed with this stuff. And like so many clever cats, bring the rat carcass into the house as a proud gift for the master.

      6. It’s easy to dismiss Sitchin. He is not an expert on ancient near Eastern languages. Dr. Michael Hessier however is. It’s easy to dismiss the apocryphal books. It’s much harder to dismiss cannon talking about nephelim fallen angels. Jude Peter Gen etc. If your worldview can’t accommodate angels mating with humans prehaps other super natural events in the Bible are also easy to dismiss? Walking on water, Virgin Birth floating axes, talking donkeys etc? What’s clear is that 1 century Jews fully understood the nephelim as the result of fallen angels mating with women. Also they understood one the main causes of human suffering was that when those heavenly being desended they taught man evil things. The reason for the flood was clearly understood. Perhaps you don’t believe in the flood?

      7. You are referring to Michael Heiser, I think, who wrote “The Unseen Realm.” He definitely debunks Sitchen and ancient astronauts. He goes into the giants and Goliath being a descendant of the Nephilim, etc. and the existence of lesser gods who are left in charge who basically fail man and are replaced or punished by Yahweh. I am not remembering all the details. Admittedly, it is interesting, and much more scholarly than other attempts to interpret obscure texts. Please do not misunderstand. I did not MERELY dismiss angels mating with humans. I find it incomprehensible, which means I cannot make sense if it; that is to say, it makes no sense in spiritual or biological terms. Many things happen that are no doubt incomprehensible to me; but this one certainly seems problematic. Who, after all, can comment intelligently on sex acts between non-human spiritual entities and humans? I plead ignorance and hope the rest of us are honest enough to leave it as something we do not understand and cannot intelligently comment on; more than that, the whole idea derives from a questionable interpretation of a word in a very old text that is not understood. I seem to recall, by the way, that Heiser is not identifying the sexual predators here as angels but as lesser gods in whose image we were made. If I have misunderstood Heiser’s text, please feel free to correct me. There is, as I recall, a council of gods which Heiser refers to. I had trouble following exactly what he meant by this and what he said happened to these gods as I stopped midway with his book, feeling a little lost as to what I should think. Humans mating with gods in whose image they were made is somewhat more intelligible, but raises other questions. An older text I have cited before is John Garnier’s “The Worship of the Dead: Or the Origin and Nature of the Pagan Idolatry and Its Bearing Upon the Early History of Egypt and Babylonia.” Garnier does not think these lesser gods were actually gods, but long-lived antediluvian mortals (giants, etc.). Perhaps this strikes me as more believable than Heiser’s interpretation. But what do I know about the supernatural side of pre-history? None of us know much. Garnier is much wider in his learning than Heiser, but, admittedly, he might not be as profound. He takes a very different road than Heiser takes. I do not know who is correct on the question of what the Nephilim are. How could I know? As you are now playing Inquisitor with me, I will answer because I am a good sport: yes, I certainly believe in miracles, as I believe in things supernatural as well as natural; and I do believe in the Flood, as it has been widely attested to in nearly all cultures and by most peoples. I would further add that this kind of discussion, though interesting, may be to no purpose. You are perhaps judging me by the yardstick of your own sectarian faith; and that is something that troubles me, because who on earth is going to agree with everyone else on every fine point of religious doctrine? Is that what we must have before we can have political agreement? I hope not. Furthermore, I sense many eyes watching, and if I agree with the specifics of some obscure interpretation of theirs, then I will receive some kind of credit; if not, then I will suffer discredit. Either my soul is saved and I am not regarded as a heretic or I am an instrument of Satan. I have become aware of this subtle game of religious judgment for some time. My purpose in writing is political and not religious, yet half the time I feel myself before an Inquisition. I wonder. Are we only able to resist communism as separate Christian sects, all ready to judge each other as Satanic? Or can we set aside our spiritual interpretations and unite against an enemy who, if successful, will exterminate us all? My position is: We do not know what a Nephilim is but we do know what a communist is. And you may damn me to Hell for remaining doubtful on Nephilim, for not knowing whether they were giants, angels, or lesser deities. But I do not care so much for such ancient curiosities. My concern is to name our country’s enemy here and now, and to oppose the revolutionary catechism that seeks to transform mankind through politics. I seek no salvation through politics myself, but only to forestall real destruction — if that makes sense. I cannot tell exactly what an Angel is, or what the words in long-dead ancient languages mean, but I can tell you what a communist is and why we need to wake up and fight back. For anyone to pretend to absolute knowledge about supernatural things, or to say they are in possession of that kind of truth, leaves me cold. I cannot see through the fog which surrounds such subjects, my discernment being more focused on matters at hand. Which scholar is right? Which interpretation? I do not know. The Nephilim as a race of giants, descended from beings in whose image we are made seems more comprehensible. But I seriously do not think such obscure claims or reasonings should be the basis of our spiritual or historical or political understandings; to know exactly what an Angel, or a god, or a “watcher” is, cannot be important now. If you do know, then good for you. I do not understand your preoccupation when your country is being destroyed.

      8. It’s easy to dismiss Sitchin. He is not even close to being an expert on ancient near East languages esp. Sumerian. If you want a PhD expert on ancient Lang. Christian take on Sitchin see Dr. Michael Heisser site sitchinidwrong dot com. Its easy to dispute the apocryphal books. Much harder to do so with cannon talking about nephelim fallen angels. If you can believe in a God creating the universe out of nothing, Virgin birth, walking on water, water to wine, disembodied hands writing on walls, a flood etc, why do you find it hard to accept what Old test writers had to say as well as Peter and Jude? It’s clear that the Jews from Old test times to Christ’s times had a clear understanding that angels did mate with human females. If it doesn’t fit your worldview fine. You and the board would be better served by reading Heisser work than trying to answer your questions here. But every question you just asked have clear answers. They knew why the flood was necessary but maybe there are many miracles you disbelieve?

      9. @JRNyquist: Yeah, I refuse to read von Daniken’s and Sitchin’s books, because to me, at best, these texts’ subject matter is fantastical, and is very “out there”; and, at worst, the authors are hucksters for producing and for promoting such material.

      10. Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. Sitchin and company are not credible. I believe the Bible is and there is much scholarly work by serious Christian experts on the subject.

  8. I think we are yet to fully understand the damage caused by these vaccines. It is very obvious that vaccine recipients shed something – women have reported irregular menstrual cycles and people have gotten sick by being near the vaccinated. Reports of magnetization of the vaccinated can be seen on the Stew Peters show. Something is being transmitted. Does this mean the vaccinated can sterilize those around them? Are the exposed now just as immuno-compromised as the vaccinated? Does this also mean that they will now develop cancer and other diseases? There are many questions that need to be answered.

    I’ve stumble across suramin and shikimic acid as potential remedies. Have you heard anything about these, Jeff?

    I think that the acute problems are the least of our worries… the vaccinated are the real super spreaders.

    Could this be why China blocked the entry of foreigners as of September 28, 2020?

    I’m assuming that the perpetrators have an antidote to the vaccines. I wonder what it might be.

      1. Entirely? I don’t entirely believe you. Jones is reporting facts. He ads his own commentary on the news without qualification. As long as the viewer gets that, it’s all good.

    1. There’s no way to accurately re-edit the DNA, once the nanobots have done their dirty work. It might be possible that a healthy immune system with or without antioxidants and chelation might eventually detoxify the graphene oxide, metallic structures,parasites, and prion crystals, but the subjects will no longer be man. People will become hybrids with insects and parasites. If fortunate, they will be sterile, or their offspring will also be monsters.


      1. Altering a very minor part of the DNA of a small percentage of your cells will not make you non-human. It may give you a chronic medical condition. It does not make you a “hybrid.” — Anymore than a person with cancer is a hybrid.

      1. I heard Dr. Simone Gold address the question of shedding. She says yes, viral shedding can occur but it is limited in time. As far as damaging the health of surrounding people permanently–no, it does not. Yes, it can cause some symptoms, but in the bigger picture, this is the least of the issues we should be focused on. And she also said there is no antidote for those who have had COVID and have been vaccinated or just have been vaccinated. You just keep on going. Her main fear are these vaccine mandates.
        If we all put our energy to solving this one issue, maybe we could stop them.

    2. Coincidentally, the idea of vaccine shedding, gives support to social distancing. We aren’t supposed to be within physical distance conducive to conversation. Only talk story over cell phones which can be monitored by the NSA.

      Prions are definitely contagious through respiration and sweat glands, though, so perhaps there are other ingredients and by products of the serums which are transmissible as well. A good immune system ought to be able to deal with all of these contaminates.

      I don’t think that parasites are passed through exhalation, but the Hydra can be Osterized and it will grow back an entire body from each particle. I wouldn’t care to inhale any of that in any event. Turmeric is an anti-parasitic, antiviral, antibacterial, and blood thinner; all good to combat the shots and the Flu.

      1. Sorry about zapping your long religious post, THE; but I do not encourage long sectarian religious postings. It incites controversy over Biblical interpretations that divides rather than unites Americans.

  9. The horrifying truth about the Covid-vaccine injuries (including a vast number of deaths, and counting) is slowly coming out even on the political stage – thank God. Will that result in a turnaround? Let us hope and pray and do everything each of us can do to make such a turnaround a reality! Otherwise, these Bolsheviks will stamp out the flame of justice and freedom wherever it raises its proud and courageous head, and simply carry on “building back better” the world we so cherish and that we can and will and must not give up on!


  10. Hero, The Hero ! Absolutely must read: Joseph Campbell book The Hero with a Thousand Faces
    otherwise : trust me the subject will not be fully understood))

    1. Joseph Campbell teaches new age baloney. Beware anyone who says the snake in the Garden of Eden was a good guy, as Campbell did in his PBS special.

  11. the general level of intelligence of the comments is something to consider))
    seems like ppl never went to high school even)) I remember it was something like biology for the 5th grade when they explain immune system. Easy: just read you kids or grandkids school book Immunity did not change since you were in school, just your brain changed and forgot or may be never learned?
    ON the current covid vax: those are RNA kind of vax, RNA is like a regulatory system , so by manipulating it we can castrate the virus in theory of course. In fact Moderna vax did not achieve full castration and hence many vaxed developed a full grown covid case. As my dentist friend did. Then he infected us all: family and friends who visited him in a week after his vax. We did a FULL contact tracing WE KNOW. – u will see

    I advice ppl to read what chinese EAT. Check out the photos of their dishes- u will see enormous amount of fresh or lightly cooked veggies in a green color and others too. And some meat and some seafood, noodles, rice, but vegies, fresh , green – dominate especially for the Chinese poor, hey even grow `food` to survive all over the place.

    Vegies bring QUARTECIN to your body cells. This flavonoid OPENS the door in a cell for zinc to enter.
    If you have enough zinc the virus ANY VIRUS wil have a problem to replicate(to multiply as is)

    This is how you survive. If you are such that reject good diet as Chinese eat, if you eat American diet- guaranteed you are doomed, if not today- soon. Sorry, boys

    1. Very true. Have you read the China Study (Campbell) and/or The Starch Solution (McDougall)? These and other doctors agree with what you stated. The Blue Zones (book or video) is another good source.

  12. 24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: 25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. 26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. 27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? 28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this*. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? 29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

    Matthew 13:24-30 KJV

    1. @ “The”: Jeff has asked repeatedly for commenters not to turn the comments board into a “Sunday School” – you are not exercising any virtue by disrespecting your host’s request.

      In any case, copying and pasting slabs of Scripture without further explanation is merely a kind of conservative virtue signaling.

      If you really think you can make a relevant point with a Biblical passage, then say why you think it is relevant, and if the passage is more than a dozen words long, just cite the book, chapter and verses – anyone interested will be capable of looking for the passage (or may know it already).

      The main lesson I draw from the parable of the wheat and the tares is that God allows the Church to contain impurities (false shepherds, hypocritical laymen etc.) in this world (since we need to be tested) and as a corollary, it is futile to create breakaways of breakaways of breakaways in the attempt to create a “pure church”. That doesn’t seem relevant to Jeff’s post. Do you have an interpretation that would lend the passage any relevance?


        Thank you for asking,

        Jeff broaches the topic of religion, then disallows any rebuttal. He says it’s divisive, as if his campaign against Russia and China is not. The United States of America, is based upon Christian principals, which tolerates free will, free choice of faith, and freedom of speech.

        Jeff can redact whatever he wishes to here, but I find him more than somewhat disingenuous. The parable of the Tars and Wheat, says that divisiveness is assured.

        The Supreme Court is about to examine British Common Law, in regard to the Right to Bear Arms. While it is true, that the United States of America, is based upon Christian Common Law, in the British tradition, The Bill Of Rights, is not a wish list, nor is it open to interpretation. A “well regulated militia,’ simply means to be put in good order, in old fashioned English.

        As the Constitution already provides for Government to form an Army, it is for The People to form the Militia, or Militias, or just carry a gun at any and all times. The Second Amendment is presented as means for The People to defend all their other, God Given Rights.

        This course of study embarked upon by the Supreme Court, is irrelevant and inappropriate. Foreign law has no jurisdiction in The United States of America. This is a subtle attempt, to introduce foreign precedents to American jurisprudence, in order to undermine the USA, and internationalize the country.

        Globalists detest moral standards, and seeks to replace it with situational ethics.

      2. To the person calling me dishonest: I have a book by a constitutional scholar who goes into the question of the militia, which is a function of the states; so that you are not exactly correct in your interpretation. How you got from calling me disingenuous to a statement about your right to carry a gun at all and any times I do not know. In fact, you need a permit to carry a concealed weapon in many states. Yet you assert your right, above state law, based on the Bible. Will you now assert a right to Revolution? To the use of violence? And who will you direct this violence against? Will you shoot at me, since you have already set me down as an enemy? For if I am disingenuous am I not your enemy? — an enemy of TRUTH? You would put me in a very uncomfortable position: that of referee between competing sectarian faiths and theologies, forced to alienate readers based on religious differences. By all means, have at it. On this website we saw — at one point — Protestants attacking Catholics over the Virgin Mary and Catholics fighting back. I had a supposed Russian Orthodox sniping at both Protestants and Catholics. But you know the rules here. Why do you come? What hatred animates your? You want freedom to preach your religious ideas on my site? Now there is someone advancing the Vedas to subtly criticize the Bible. Shall I allow that? There is no end to religious wars. But you may want such a war. Forgive me, but I do not want to live in Northern Ireland in the 1960s. Whatever topic I pick — and everyone here can attest to the truth — there is a tendency of religious people to bring in their particular views which include views critical of other forms of Christianity, or of Judaism or Mormonism or name your target. I can assure you, it can become very ugly very quickly. Suddenly love and grace somehow turns to anger and arguments so ancient and so encrusted with bloodshed, I shudder. All of Europe was convulsed by religious wars less than 400 years ago. Tolerance was a hard lesson to learn and I see signs that some people are unlearning those lessons. So when somebody starts quoting the Bible at me, and I am doing everything to avoid religious controversy, you will forgive my annoyance as it has caused me no end of trouble as a referee. I am frankly disgusted by religious intolerance and hatred, which I got a snoot-full of yesterday when I went to a meeting of the Board of Health and heard a man with a Bible in his hand oppose vaccine mandates. He stood up and said the vaccine issue was predicted in the Bible. He said everybody knew it. And people were nodding their heads in agreement. But I was not agreeing. I was profoundly uneasy. Afterwards I fell into conversation with him when he suddenly denounced the Jews as enemies of America and Christ. He recommended the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as important reading material. Next to me was a nurse fighting to stop vaccinations as much as he was; only she was Jewish. Do you have any idea how angry I am right now at the stupidity of bigots? So I am immediately suspicious — from experience — at people who bring religion into politucs. What is their game? You might be well-meaning, but it is a process full of danger. So really, the whole subject of religious intolerance is rather raw with me right now. Too many people today have no manners, no consideration for others, being mindless fanatics for interpretations that are not really spiritual at all. I don’t like discussing religion here because a particular emphasis on certain scriptures or ideas can offend good Americans who read things differently, who worship from another catechism. When exactly did we lose the common sense needed to maintain ourselves as a multi-ethnic country of different faiths? There is a certain code of behavior you should already be following in mixed company. Do you go into a business meeting and start a religious discussion with associates whose feelings on such things you do not even know? Of course not. The United States is not all one sect. Religion does not unite us politically. It divides us. Therefore it can destroy us politically if we start pushing it into politics. A sectarian approach to politics in a country of many sects is not workable. Politics is about statecraft and war. It is about unity. Religion spiritualizes us, but it cannot produce unity if the particulars are emphasized. People are free to choose their church. Governments are imposed on us by elections and constitutional conventions. Government is about force — about checking and balancing force. Religion should not direct such a force. It should not direct the political function any more than religion should determine how wealth is distributed. Politics is a technical subject all its own. It is about checks and balances, constitutions and taxes, political economy and war. It is about the friend/enemy distinction. I object to drawing that distinction so as to exclude most of our countrymen. The communists who are taking over the country are a minority who win by playing “divide and conquer.” It is therefore no disingenuous trick on my part to warn you — in a political discussion — from quoting the Bible (a book understood differently by different people). And I do not appreciate being called dishonest for drawing this conclusion and wanting no part of religious controversy. I have read enough history and theology to know we should not go there. Not too long ago I was attacked publicly on the radio by a caller who said the world was flat, and by denying the flat earth I was opposed to God. He said the Bible is very clear on this point. The world, he insisted, is flat. It was one of those moments in which you find yourself stunned by the ignorance, the fanaticism, and the irrationality of men who have learned to read — but not to think.

      3. To raise the topic of religion and then to deny discussion in an open forum is disingenuous; not dishonest. That is rather to say, unfair; a tease. The point about the Second Amendment is to clarify what the Supreme Court is up to. They are trying to make the World homogeneous, without division.

        “The Right to Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed.” Clearly that means for the People. The point being to keep Government from infringing. The Bill Of Rights, does not grant Rights. Rights come from God. That’s Common Law. What the Bill Of Rights does, is spell out for aspiring tyrants, what is the responsibility of The People to defend. The Second Amendment states how.

        Violence is up the the tyrants to start. Any abusive agent of the State is fair game. Anyone who abuses their Rights is subject to prosecution, by The People. Before Jim Crow, America had no public police force. They would defend themselves, and in cases of Torts, and where a criminal remains at large, a Marshal would come to town every once in awhile and form a posse to round him up, give him a fair and speedy trial, and if found guilty of a major offense, hung from the nearest tree.

        That’s where we’re headed today.

      4. You like putting words in people’s mouths, Jeff. The KKK abused people’s rights, to say the least. I said fair speedy trial. Waiting weeks or months is an infringement. What I’m talking about, is when the goons come to hold me down and forcibly inject me with the deadly mRNA Covid serum, they will lose at least three of their abusive agents in the effort.

        When the police all die from the shots, and the others quit, people will have to return to Common Law. In the old days, along with the marshal, a judge would make the rounds. He was merely a referee, making sure that the rules were followed. The Jury is the real judge. People have been hanging muggers and burglars for more than a few years already, in Buenos Aires.

      5. When George Floyd was executed, people spontaneously marched in the streets to express their outrage. The didn’t let the lockdowns stop them, despite their hysteria in fear of the virus hoax. The BLM movement quickly swooped in to hijack the movement, as controlled opposition. Antifa are agent provocateurs of the JTTF. George Floyd was no good, but his martyrdom was the best thing that could have happened to America under the Covid Live Exercise. It put a major crimp in plans for a police state.


      6. I agree that Floyd was no hero. One point I do not agree, however: the virus is not a hoax. A friend almost died of it, suffering serious oxygen reduction and almost suffocating. He had no flu symptoms whatsoever. It is no flu. It is a bioweapon that does not affect everyone equally.

  13. Regarding The Holy Bible:
    as a long time student of Vedic religion and philosophic system, Sanskrit i mean,-
    i found MANY most archetypical Bible stories in VEDAS. Check out the Upanishads: there is a ling detailed account of the same story as Genesis presents regarding Abraham , the Father of faith , ordeal with an attempt to sacrifice his son, Isaac. S. Kierkegaard , a fundamental European thinker presented also that story in his Fear and Trembling piece

    1. Satan knew that one day, that The King James Version, would be published, and sought a preemptive strike against it.

      1. Judaic texts, that also became a part of Canonic Christian Bible, most important of them like Genesis and others- research shows that those were copied from Vedas and re-edited some. Still if we able to find Vedic originals to this and that Biblical stories and ideas – we will be able to get much deeper in our understanding of the Holy Bible. Of course this discourse MUST have a name of Manly P Hall mentioned

        I would say also : the science of Kaballah may opne an understanding of Genesis most important Truth. But mind that Kaballah science needs to be properly studied and understood (only for the most adult and adv advanced and only after at least 40 years of age).

        Kaballah puts out a question than no one else ever asked: Why the creation? Why our Heavenly Father needed all this?

        And then the science of Kaballah offers an answer. The answer is that the Creator was not acting alone

        He CALLS ON the Tora. Vedic religion names Her Rita. She is female and only manifested when creation begins. Before She is hiding in some non-manifested dimension(this is better understood if the reader studied high mathematics college level)

        Tora-Rita is the Law, a set of Rules even God must obey, that includes all known and unknown physics laws to start the Big Bang; also included are Moral norms and other things never to be violated

        As Manly Hall explains: this is the answer to the naïve question L why God allows for evil to exist:
        He is under obedience to Tora and it is impossible for creation to exist beyond Tora. Only when creation ends – Tora retreats into non-manifested dimension

        Cosmogony actually explains that all stars will burn out at some point, pure science , same exact science as we applied for the nitrogen bomb, absolutely same formulas used.

        To have a proper UNDERSTANDING of the Holy Scriptures one must study nuclear physics and quantum mechanics

        More simple minds of course can not, but they can PRAY and have Faith, well, based on trust, not on knowledge , with later being of course the privilege of the few..

      2. In the compilation of ancient Hebrew Scripture, in the King James Version, translated from the texts found at Antioch, there are more than twelve hundred Prophecies, on about eight hundred subjects. Eighty percent of those have been fulfilled, exactly as foretold. The remaining twenty percent are for the future; most of which to occur during a seven year period of time. No prediction has ever turned out wrong. Such one hundred percent accuracy is scientifically impossible, yet true. No secular prognosticators, such as Nostradamus or Edgar Casey has more than a sixty percent success rate, which is still beyond the law of averages, but The Bible requires for one wrong prediction to result in the people to stone to death the false prophet who made it.

    1. I know personally at least one direct victim of the New york city mass murder by covid. This man was around 65 years old, just slightly older then us. He was the theoretical physicist, but retired because of the Alzheimer. In short: they put him in a place (CUOMO MURDER HOMES) where he contracted the virus and died very fast. He was a Jew of russian extraction, many friends from former Soviet union who KNOW THIS STORY> Mind that ex soviets are not like regular americans in their thinking. We do not trust NO BODY EVER. As you all should do all the time: do not trust even yourselves, verify, USE THE BRAINS
      We lost here in a big NYC area more people than were murdered by nazis in Ky iv in infamous murdering pit babij Yar, in 1941. At least 75 000 dead. Many death were not reported because the immediate cause was heart attack. Heart attacks resumed in NY on epidemic scale since april 2020 as reported b y multiple medics and ER specialists and were reported in Post, Times, etc

      1. Not sure what it means, but I am not a Jew nor of Russian extraction, but I most definitely find myself NOT trusting anyone at all. Okay. There are some friends, but I eye them with some suspicion. We are surrounded by lies in this world, what people believe has been tainted and distorted. Thank you for sharing the story, but it angers me that these evil rats seem to be getting away with murder.

    2. not sure where my previous reply went? It was a short story on a person in NY who was murdered in a cuomo murdering homes. ALso i offered a stats on real number of covid deaths here: OVER the number of genocided Jews in Babiy Yar, in 1941. We estimate that big NY area lost close to 100 000 if not more. All conclusions supported by stats analysis and open sources, and stats reportings

    3. I just finished watching Dr. Bryan Ardis. I think it’s absolutely credible what he says. He goes to the government’s own website and points to their own misinformation especially about Remdesivir. In addition to Dr. Ardis, I have heard from multiple health care professionals that this drug causes kidney failure in over a third of the patients. Dr. Ardis talks about his personal experience with a hospitalized family member with COVID led him to do some research. He went to the CDC website for treatment protocols which referred him to the NIH. There he learned that Remdesivir was an experimental drug being recommended to hospitalized patients with COVID. The statement from NIH (where Dr. Fauci heads the Allergy and Infectious Disease Institute) stated it was safe and effective based on a study completed in November of 2019. So, Dr. Ardis researched the study. The study used to test Remdesivir was performed in Africa on Ebola victims, including newborns. The study showed the drug killed 53% of the test volunteers so they discontinued the drug. Yet! Dr. Fauci wrote a letter stating this drug was safe and effective for COVID and the ONLY drug hospitals should use. How unbelievably wicked is that! Plus, if the patient is on Medicare/Medicaid, the hospital is paid a 25% bonus. And did you know who paid for that study in Africa? Why, no one other than the department headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci himself. Liar, liar pants on fire! He knows Remdesivir is not safe. It killed more than half the people in the test study. He paid for that study. So yes, Dr. Fauci and all the healthcare organizations bowing to him are killing people in our hospitals. Remember the funeral director John O’Looney? He said that Great Britain’s hospitals were notorious for prescribing lethal doses of Midazolam, a sedative. Well, they use that drug i in this country to help calm people who are intubated and on Remdesivir. This all has to stop. Between the lethal side effects of intubation, Remdesivir, and the possible over dosing of Midazolam, it would be a miracle for any COVID intubated on Remdesivir patient to survive. I think I have commented enough.

      1. Very good commentary, ladyfromlibertygarage. I have seen similar evidence as you cite. They are poisoning sick people, which is by no means something new for modern bureaucratic medicine. The scandal is astounding, huge, maddening.

  14. It’s impossible to ignore the cavernous silence from conservatives surrounding supposed rampant systemic election fraud when Republicans win them. If Democrats had won yesterday election fraud would be back in the picture, so because they lost you’re laser focused on the vaccine. Until fear of that dies down and Democrats win another election, then you’ll be back on election fraud. Whichever fear flies into your face at any given moment is the reason the world is ending. Have you ever considered that maybe you inflate these fears beyond a reasonable scope and they hinder your vision? Do you not see the circles in which you endlessly run? The delusions here are so strong.

    1. The People are under a Blitzkrieg assault. It will be near impossible to completely unravel all the twisted wreckage. Nobody owns anything. The banks were broke before the Covid Live Exercise, began. The first thing done was to order everyone to commit economic suicide, or be classified as non essential. Free speech censored by masks, social distancing, and lock downs. Election fraud everywhere. All sorts of infringing municipal codes have been written. We never should have tolerated the Patriot Act in the first place.

    2. It’s because one party does all of the election fraud. They have been caught in the act many times and charged for it. For every time they’ve been caught, there are countless times they’re not.

      The counter argument is that Republicans engage in “voter suppression” by wanting to have standards and security for elections. There should be much higher standards and security levels, It should not be “easy” to vote.

      1. John Kerry complained back in 2004 that the Republicans used the Venezuelan, Smartmatic voting machines to cheat him. Neither Democrats nor Republicans want to discuss that today. The press doesn’t bring it up. Why do voters continue to use them, knowing full well that it’s rigged? Why should politicians do anything about it when the voters continue to use them?

      1. Yes! People who continuously hold such extreme beliefs and are immune to the effects of reason are scary. Stating that voting machines should be looked into at the time of an election loss and initiating a storming of the Capitol aren’t even comparable events. This kind of conflation does absolutely no good for anything. But someone like “THE” will quickly mention the name John Kerry and 2004 and feel like he just made a viable argument. Did people storm the Capitol in 2004 protesting a “fraudulent election” egged on by the losing candidate? No. Any machine inspections requested were done and the result was accepted. It’s a 180 degree difference between then and now. To deny this is to choose the extremist belief. The extremist belief reigns supreme on the religious right. It is drowning our country.

      2. Radiofort: Funny you should write this, since you are the mirror image of a religious right extremist: you are an anti-religious left extremist. Your kind murdered 100 million since 1917. Religious fanatics who kill people are scary, of course. But they have not burned a heretic in almost 300 years. So you scare me more. Way more.

      3. You are a Christian, and you are attacking me for being a religious extremist? So you purport yo think exactly as I do. Now you have overstepped the boundary of polite conversation by gaslighting me. Do you ever read what I write? Troll that you are: please read what I actually write and only put comments that address what my points, otherwise I will just delete you — waste of time that you are.

  15. Jeff, what is your opinion of William S Lind and his theories of Fourth Generation Warfare? He claims that a war between nuclear powers is extremely unlikely.

      1. Someone recently told me that President Eisenhower, who warned US about the ‘Military Industrial Complex,’ tried to designate nuclear arms as conventional weapons. The source wondered why he would do attempt such an incongruity. I speculated that Ike believed that people would think nuclear weapons so devastating that they would otherwise be thought to be unthinkable to really use. As long as nukes aren’t perceived to be a credible threat, the Military Industrial Complex could make profits from proliferation of them.

      2. I think you’re right Mr. Nyquist, every weapon ever made has eventually been used. The one thing that may be keeping the Russians & Chinese back is that even if they use mostly air-bursts, neutron bombs & so on there are still the dozens of nuclear power plants in the United States to be considered. In the event of such a catastrophic attack there would be no one to man them, consequently they’d melt down & ruin the farmland that they need. What’s more drifting radioactive plumes would inflict devastation on their own countries.I’d be interested to hear your ideas on the likely methods that they might employ to avert this.

      3. An air-bursted hydrogen bomb will generate no meaningful radioactive contamination. How could it? Fusion is clean and no short-term fallout results if you keep the intensely hot fireball above ground level. Peter Pry has argued that this air-burst technique could even be used to destroy America’s land based missile silos in the upper Midwest — with the added benefit of saving Russian bomber crews (carrying out time-sensitive follow-up attacks) from flying through 20,000 rad clouds that would kill them in minutes (i.e., bomber fratricide). As for the destruction of nuclear power plants: this would occur only in the event of a super-EMP strike, which would cause all nuclear plants in direct line of sight to the high-altitude detonation to melt down — causing more long-lived radioactive contamination than several thousand full-blown fusion-bomb wars. Please note: Fusion is clean, fission is dirty. From a military operational perspective, nuclear supremacy is what you want. Using conventional forces in conjunction with nuclear forces is a win-win. No division or Corps formation can hold its position when the enemy can launch air-burst nuclear strikes against it. The follow-on conventional attacks would then meet with a unit whose personnel have broken eardrums, and who have suffered the effects of blast waves and heat, super-hurricane-force-winds, etc. Of course, a strategic weapon would probably not be used on a division or corps. But then, why not? Tactical nuclear weapons are effective and made for the job, of course, but non-nuclear vacuum bombs are even better, producing shock waves that pass through armor and concrete, making jelly out of human organ tissue. No army could withstand such bombardments for long. Resistance might be stiff in places, but a military unit subjected to such bombardment would collapse within a few days if not a few hours. Radiation is a problem downwind of hard targets — nuclear weapon storage areas, submarine bunkers, command and control facilities, etc. Here you would need a good fallout shelter with water and food for 13 to 18 days. Check your position on a map relative to Strategic targets. Presently, in my opinion, a biological attack is ongoing against the United States. If we resist the attack protocols, they will eventually use military means to clean us up. That is why Russia and China are mobilizing conventional and nuclear forces at present. What stops their offensive? Evil is its own special form of idiocy. The nexus of the world market being destroyed, Russia and China would suffer economic devastation from their own policies and from their attacks redounding to the disruption of their own supply chains. Eventually their armies and nuclear forces would begin to break down. Their societies would turn against the madmen who had brought on conditions of mass starvation, even cannibalism. The most devastated areas in North America, if free from occupation, could recover — provided principles of free economy and political unity were followed. See Herman Kahn’s study, “On Thermonuclear War” for details, especially the economic part of the study, pp. 74-78, 92-95.

      4. Speaking from my point of view, nuclear war is very likely. It’s one of the quickest ways to clear out cities that have very little in production. Examples include cities like Miami, Washington DC, Las Vegas, Phoenix, and other cities where the main products seem to be money manipulation, retirees and not actual products. The first warning that we’d have that the war is starting is a simultaneous nuclear attack on those cities and our land-based missiles and bombers. Tens of millions of Americans will die.

        The Chinese will try to keep as much as possible of the crop lands to stave off starvation in China. That’s the whole purpose of their demand for Lebensraum.

  16. HERE IS THE SHOCKING VACCINE DATA!!!!! Share and repost!
    Far from being “safe and effective”, they are “dangerous and defective”.
    Negative vaccine efficacy percentages reveal MASSIVE damage to the immune system that is progressing on a weekly basis!
    What was once deemed a conspiratorial joke is now proving to be true, the vaccinated are all progressively developing AIDS!!!!




    1. The good news is that all of the obnoxious, noisy, useful idiots who go around ordering people to wear a mask and get vaccinated, will soon be gone. Who will Big Brother get to do his dirty work then; Robo Dog?

      1. When they’re gone they’ll be replaced by the Chaff that looks like Wheat on this day. You simply create a new fear-du-jour and the fearful fists tighten against any opposition to any Strong Man who offers a claim of immediate protection.

  17. This article starts with deep philosophical questions. So that’s where I’ll start.

    The first thing I noticed was a reference to the failure of Platonic thought. He was unable to encompass both individual objects and universals into one unified theory, so opted for the universals. Aristotle opted for the individuals. The same difference is found between Lao Tse and Confucius in China. That bug is a feature of that way of thinking based on ahistorical form and external appearances, where the present is the key to the past. Because that way of thinking was used by the ancient Greek philosophers, modern philosophers call it “Greek Thought”.

    But there’s another way of thinking. Its features are:
    • Historical, the past is the key to the present.
    • Based on experiences and observations, not necessarily logically understood.
    • Practical, based on observation. It takes people, objects and situations where they are and works from there. Theory takes back seat to observation.
    • Function. Connected with function is action. Examples include “Pretty is as pretty does” and “A young man makes himself recognized by his repeated actions” Proverbs 20:11 and “Actions speak louder than words”.
    • Internal structure. How things are constructed are more important than their appearances. In communication, it’s the ideas that underlay the words used that are important, not the exact words that communicate those ideas.
    • Patterns. There is the natural beat of time, from heartbeats to the patterns of day and night, months and years. This is also a way to combine both particulars and universals, for though particulars (objects and/or actions) may not be exactly like other particulars, they fit patterns that point to universals.
    • Democratic. In government and society this is expressed as Lex Rex, where the law is king and even the king is subject to it.
    Philosophers call this way of thinking “Hebrew thought” because it is found in the Bible, of which the Old Testament was written in Hebrew. This list is excerpted from an Amazon book review found at https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2TU1ZFIBS2HCJ/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0393005348

    “Hebrew Thought” is the basis of modern science, which post-modernists have been tearing down for over a century because it doesn’t support their ideology. The “scientific description of history through evolution” violates both the classical definition of the scientific method from modern science, and the historical method.

    I would suggest that the use of Hebrew Thought should help us see through the lies, the obfuscations, the attempts of hiding the truth, the false appearances that plague our nation and world today. Examples include that when I look at Fauci, I see a man whose repeated actions are evil, even devilish. Bill Gates has a history that tells what sort of man is he. We look at the communists as a group, their actions fit a pattern. We learn how they use words, so we know how to recognize their attempts at deceptions. These give us a practical guide in how to react.

    I think our readers are smart enough to see how this all fits into the present SARS-Covid-2 situation in which we presently find ourselves. Also the communist danger that threatens our nation and world. So do I need to say more?

  18. You speak here of the Great Man. I can only foresee a Strong Man rising to prominence in the current milieu. The Strong Man lacks greatness in every regard but brings order from chaos by rending all felonies worthy of a summary death penalty and all LGBT garbage abhorrent. Satan hates pride and challenges to his own power regardless of how ideologically pure his followers may be.

      1. Charisma, military experience, and ultra high technology. The man on the white horse who wields the bow without the arrow. The potential to use superior force, without actually having to resort to using it.

  19. Since some cared to share poems, one came to my mind. It’s from a man who has been called the “wisest man to ever live”. Of course, his words are profound. Lines 13 and 14 especially stood out to me.

    Ecclesiastes 12:1 “Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not, nor the years draw nigh, when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them;
    2 While the sun, or the light, or the moon, or the stars, be not darkened, nor the clouds return after the rain:
    3 In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the windows be darkened,
    4 And the doors shall be shut in the streets, when the sound of the grinding is low, and he shall rise up at the voice of the bird, and all the daughters of music shall be brought low;
    5 Also when they shall be afraid of that which is high, and fears shall be in the way, and the almond tree shall flourish, and the grasshopper shall be a burden, and desire shall fail: because man goeth to his long home, and the mourners go about the streets:
    6 Or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken, or the pitcher be broken at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the cistern.
    7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
    8 ¶ Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity.
    9 And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge; yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs.
    10 The preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was written was upright, even words of truth.
    11 The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd.
    12 And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
    13 ¶ Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
    14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.

Comments are now closed.