To achieve victory in a future war, it will not be sufficient to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them very accurately on target; it will also be necessary that the ground forces be able to move rapidly into regions which have been subjected to nuclear strikes. Only when this problem is solved will it be possible to speak of the effective exploitation of nuclear strikes by tanks and infantry in conclusively defeating the enemy, or of carrying out extensive maneuvers and decisive advances in depth.

Soviet Military Strategy, [p. 343]

In 1990 I spoke with a Mexican gun runner. We met at the house of a someone we both knew. The Mexican placed a loaded gun on the table and spoke expansively about his “love” of mankind, his Cuban drinking buddies in Mexico, and the future destruction of the United States. There was an unmistakable Marxist element in the gunrunner’s far-left worldview. It was clear from our conversation that he hated America and he loved communist Cuba.

My interest in the rising cross-border criminal class from Mexico stemmed from a then recently-published book by Joseph D. Douglass, Jr., titled Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West. This book describes “long-term Russian and Chinese intelligence operations aimed at achieving the demoralization and ultimate control of the West….” After preparing for several years, the Soviet special services entered the world of drug trafficking in 1960. They called it “Operation Friendship of Nations.” Soviet dictator Nikita S. Khrushchev got the idea from Chairman Mao Zedong of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), who had instructed his subordinates to “begin cultivating opium on a grand scale” in 1928. According to Douglass, “Mao’s strategy was simple; use drugs to soften a target area. Then after a captured region had been secured, outlaw the use of all narcotics and impose strict controls to ensure that the poppies remained exclusively an instrument of the state for use against its enemies.” [P. 11]

In the 1950s, after Stalin’s death, the Soviet Union modernized its strategy. This involved several steps: (1) They founded Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow to train communists from Third World countries; (2) They began training terrorists from various “national liberation movements”; (3) They set up networks for international drug and narcotics trafficking; (4) they infiltrated crime syndicates throughout the world and set up their own syndicates; (5) they prepared sabotage networks throughout the world, which were to be in place by 1972. [P. 17-18]

The strategy respecting these five points was explained by Douglass as follows: “Narcotics, terrorism and organized crime were coordinated and used together in a complementary fashion. Drugs were used to destroy society. Terrorism was used to destabilize the targeted country and to prepare the revolutionary environment. Organized crime was used to control the elite. All three strands were long-range strategic operations and all three had been incorporated into Soviet Bloc planning by 1956.” [P. 19]

The creation of criminal cartels and the infiltration of international organized crime were key elements of “Operation Friendship of Nations.” As Douglass noted, “The main reason for infiltrating organized crime was the Soviet belief that high-quality information – information on political corruption, money and business, international relations, drug-trafficking, and counter-intelligence – was to be found in organized crime. The Soviets reasoned that if they could successfully infiltrate organized crime, they would acquire unusually promising scope for controlling many politicians and would have access to the best information on drugs, money, weapons and corruption of many kinds.” [P. 18]

How successful was the Soviet and Chinese strategy in subverting the United States? Undoubtedly they compromised America’s banks. They bought many politicians. They corrupted bureaucrats, police officials and intelligence officers. But that is nothing compared to the success they had in Mexico.

Chinese and cubans in mexico

In 2003 a Las Vegas journalist named Scott Gulbransen published a book titled The Silent Invasion. It was about Chinese and Cuban infiltration of northern Mexico and the U.S. southern border. Through the good offices of a Tijuana pimp named Reynaldo, Gulbransen obtained an interview with the leader of a communist group called La Conquidistas.    

Keeping his head down, Gulbransen was driven to a secret location. When he was allowed to look out the window again, he saw a sign depicting an armed man pointing to an image of the state of California. On the sign it read, “Viva Mexico, Viva Baja California.” When he arrived at the meeting place, he was searched. Men with automatic weapons and red scarves were guarding the location. Gulbransen was directed to a trailer at the back of the property. He was told to address el jefe [the boss] as “señor,” and not to ask too many questions. On entering the trailer, he was overcome by the smell of cat piss. Behind a massive maple desk sat a large man in a camouflage jump suit, wearing cheap sunglasses and smoking a cigarette. The following conversation took place:

EL JEFE: So you are the reporter?

GULBRANSEN: No, sir. I am writing a book on the U.S.-Mexican border.

EL JEFE: This I know. And what do you plan to say about the border and the people of Mexico

GULBRANSEN: I plan to discuss the problems of your people and some of the strange things going on down here.

EL JEFE: What strange things my friend?

GULBRANSEN: Well, there’s been incidents with our border patrol who claim they’ve been fired on by Mexican soldiers and soldiers that appear to be Chinese.

EL JEFE: Very well. But I must tell you, you are traveling down a dangerous road. Besides, no matter what you find, no one will believe it. 

El jefe then told Gulbransen, “We are the true Mexican people tired of the economic oppression handed down by the United States. We want our freedom and we want our northern provinces of Tejas, Nuevo Mexico, Arizona and Alta California.”

Question: Why did this maniac with cheap sunglasses think he could wrest four states away from the world’s premier military power? El Jefe’s answer was: “We have friends throughout the world.” Was this a reference to China and Cuba? El Jefe laughed and ended the interview. As Gulbransen departed, el Jefe said: “You tell the fat Americans about the real Mexico. You tell them their day to pay is coming fast. Coming very fast.”

This encounter made Gulbransen more curious than ever. So, he began an extensive investigation. What did he find? He stumbled on testimony from multiple sources indicating that Chinese ships were delivering arms, ammunition, uniforms and men into Baja California through the port of Ensenada. In addition, border agents told him the Chinese were smuggling uniforms and ammunition into the United States.  

Then there was the story of Tijuana policeman Jesus de la Rosa. Because de la Rosa was honest and did not take bribes or inform on his corrupt colleagues, he came to be trusted by his superiors. One night de la Rosa’s captain asked him to drive to a desert location south of Mexicali to meet with a Cuban. There he was given a package of money with a shopping list which included ammunition, beer, rice, cement mix, and Tijuana police uniforms. The Cuban asked that de la Rosa deliver these items. It would be an ongoing job. After making several supply runs to this desert location, de la Rosa asked the Cuban what was going on. The Cuban trusted him and showed him around a secret “army encampment.” The first soldier he met spoke a European language, had blond hair and an enormous scar across his forehead. There were ten black tents with a satellite dish connected to one of them. De la Rosa had been in the Mexican Army and realized this camp was not Mexican. The camp had Chinese, North Korean and Cuban commandos in it. Jesus de la Rosa told Gulbransen, “I don’t care if people think I am crazy, but I think the U.S. is going to be attacked. Chinese, Koreans, Cubans – they all hate the U.S. What I can’t understand is what Mexico has to do with it and how the U.S. can’t see it.”

Months after giving this testimony, de la Rosa was murdered. Gulbransen explained, “Several other sources, sources not named in this book … have also come on hard times. Several lost their jobs suddenly, others became ill with unusual ailments. Still others were harassed and even physically threatened due to their involvement.” [P. 208]

I corresponded with Gulbransen in June of 2003. He was having a hard time since the publication of the book. He said, “I’ve been followed, bumped (with a car) and these cars have also ‘cased’ my house. They’re always the same car – Ford Taurus sedans. Different colors but always the same [model]. When they bump me, it’s usually from behind at a stop light. I get out to exchange insurance, and they take off. Once, the driver (always white males 25-35) told me I am lucky I didn’t get killed and then sped off. I’ve reported them to local police and the tags are always ‘retired.’ The casing of my house I’ve also reported and each time the police never do a thing. I’ve also been followed on foot when I am in New York and also several times shopping with my family. Always [it is] the same ‘looking’ white male who follows me, enough to make it known. Almost like they want me to know and be scared … which I am not. I also have been approached by attractive women … who flirt (I am married with two kids) and say cryptic things like ‘You look like you’re a safe person….’ Or ‘Be careful not to get hurt….’ These all come out of thin air and have no context.”

Was Gulbransen being paranoid? I am inclined to think not. As Nietzsche once wrote, “if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.” About a decade ago (give or take) I called Gulbransen to see how he was doing. He sounded good. He was glad his Mexican adventure was behind him. He had decided to never touch the subject again. Can you blame him?

why nukes are not enough

The quote from Soviet Military Strategy, with which I began this essay, is something that most U.S. military experts have missed. As Chinese generals were trained in Marxist-Leninist schools and shared the same philosophy as Soviet generals, there is a common strategic mindset at work in China and Russia. These people do not think like American generals. “To achieve victory in a future war,” their guiding text says, “it will not be sufficient to have nuclear weapons … [but] it will also be necessary that the ground forces be able to move rapidly into regions which have been subjected to nuclear strikes. Only when this problem is solved will it be possible to speak of the effective exploitation of nuclear strikes by tanks and infantry in conclusively defeating the enemy, or of carrying out extensive maneuvers and decisive advances in depth.”

Think of it this way: bombs cannot take over a country. Only soldiers can do that. The real question is: How would you get Chinese soldiers into the United States in the opening days of a war? There are at least three scenarios: (1) you could move military personnel by ship to prepared enclaves in Mexico on the eve of war; (2) you could move military personnel by ship toward American ports; (3) you could fly troops to specially prepared airfields.

Today, Chinese ships are docking up and down the West Coast and in Mexico. We never think of those ships in terms of military sealift capacity. But, in truth, they can move troops and supplies into North America just as easily as they can move consumer goods. What Scott Gulbransen saw in Ensenada almost twenty years ago was nothing compared to the massive off-loading that goes on every day in Southern California or San Francisco Bay. What might they off-load into our ports if war is about to break out? Do we have troops guarding our ports now?

GRU defector Stanislav Lunev told me that Russian and Chinese plans for invading America were based on Germany’s 1940 invasion of Norway. The Germans infiltrated Norway with “tourists.” They had hidden storage facilities with uniforms and weapons. The Germans also put military personnel into merchant ships (instead of the usual merchandise). They sailed right past the British navy. Why? Because they did not look like military ships carrying troops. Imagine, if you will, the access which China enjoys to our port facilities. Imagine, as well, Chinese access to airstrips that might be used to airlift troops deep into American territory. (And yes, there are such airstrips!)

birds of a feather prepare together

The Chinese communists, of course, are now talking about war with the United States. Consider the Newsweek headline which reads, “China State Media Says Country Must Prepare for Nuclear War With U.S. After Biden Asks for COVID Probe.” Consider another disturbing Newsweek headline from 10 June: “China Increasing Military Capability at ‘Serious and Sustained Rate,’ Top U.S. General Says.” According to this story, Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, “warned on Thursday that China’s military is rapidly expanding its capabilities, saying that the U.S. must take steps to ensure it maintains a competitive advantage moving forward.” But China is not America’s only worry. On 26 May General Milley made an even more noteworthy comment. He warned that “fraying” relations with China and Russia required an urgent improvement in ties to prevent a “great power war.”

This is strange advice coming from our leading general. For the last thirty years we have been working to improve ties with Russia and China. And where has this gotten us? We have given the Russians and Chinese every break. They take advantage of us at every turn. They steal and they lie. They break treaties. They commit aggression against their neighbors. (Russia against Ukraine, China against Hong Kong.) We have sent them credits, technology, and more. And what do we get for our pains? America now finds that Russia and China are arrayed against us. General Milley says we must use diplomacy to get ourselves out of this mess. But diplomacy is what got us in it; that is, when Kissinger and Nixon “played the China card” all those years ago. And now General Milley wants President Biden to “play the Russia card” – as if Russia and China were cards that we might play with ease. No! Russia and China are players, not cards; and they have played us.

I am sorry, General Milley, but avoiding a great power conflict is not up to us. We stupidly failed to maintain the balance of power. We wrongly believed that Russia and China were enemies that could never join forces. Our “brilliant” statesmen and our Pentagon strategists made no preparation for this eventuality. Furthermore, we had decades of warnings about this very thing – from Russian defectors! In 1984 KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn warned that the Sino-Soviet split was a deception; that after the “collapse” of the Soviet Union Moscow and Beijing would cleverly shift the balance of power against America and suddenly combine their strength into what he called “one clenched fist.” In 1998 GRU defector Stanislav Lunev warned that Russia and China had developed a war plan against North America. There would be an invasion, he said, in which Russia took Alaska and parts of Canada while China took the lower 48 states. “Fraying’ relations is not the cause of our woes, General Milley; rather, the cause is our own strategic incapacity and readiness to fall into every trap our enemies set for us.

America’s policymakers have failed. They failed to understand their enemy’s strategy. They even failed to properly identify their enemy. Let me explain it in very simple terms: China is part of the “socialist camp.” Russia is part of the “socialist camp.” Cuba and North Korea are part of the “socialist camp.” Their long-range policy is designed to defeat the United States. It is a comprehensive policy, involving all areas of science, government and business. They were never going to give freedom to their people. They were never going to put away their enmity for us. And yet, our elites wanted to believe the Cold War was over. They wanted to believe in the so-called “collapse of communism.” But it was all nonsense. Just look around you. Look at Venezuela, or Cuba, or Africa, or Mexico! (Or even Canada!)

Our pundits and our professors told us that communism was a failed economic system. Such was our conceit; but I tell you: There has never been a communist economic system. The Soviet Union and Red China never had such a system. The communist bloc always practiced a form of state capitalism that restricted consumption (in the same sense that a plantation restricts the consumption of its slaves). Communism is not really about economics. It is about world revolution and the acquisition of absolute power.

Whatever forays into Mexico the Chinese and their allies have made in the past, you can bet there are more Chinese in Baja today than ever. You can also bet that China is stockpiling weapons and uniforms right here, inside the United States. Black Lives Matter, step aside. The real liberators are coming.

Moscow and Beijing have always known that America will never become a truly “socialist” country. After all, why would they want a socialist America? The United States itself must be leveled to the ground, said Stalin in the 1930s, when “the present capitalist encirclement [of the USSR] is replaced by a socialist encirclement [of capitalism] ….” A Marxist takeover of America is only meant to soften the country up, to make it ready for destruction.   

But destruction is not the final goal. As Sokolovsky’s text explained, ground forces will be necessary if the ground is to be conquered. Troops and tanks are needed to “move rapidly into regions which have been subjected to nuclear strikes.” In the paragraph quoted from Sokolovsky’s Soviet Military Strategy at the beginning of this article, the final sentence reads: “If required, the vehicles [used to transport troops] should be transportable by air along with the troops.”

What would you say if a Chinese general acquired a 200-square-mile area in Texas to build a fake wind farm? What would you say if that same Chinese general was building a 10,000-foot runway on that same property? Watch this video and see if I am mistaken:


Quarterly Subscription (voluntary)


321 thoughts on “Invasion America?

  1. Geopolitics expert warns China preparing for total war against the United States

    The long-term global domination plan has always been for China to invade and conquer the continental United States by launching attacks from Mexico, while Russia plans to attack and take Alaska, then proceed to conquer Canada.

    What has changed recently in all this, however, is that China has sharply accelerated its timetable of attacking America due to emerging revelations about the origins of the covid-19 biological weapon, which was developed under the supervision of the communist Chinese military.

    China now knows it must attack and attempt to destroy America before these investigations show China deliberately built the bioweapon and released it on the world.

  2. The beast stands not only at the gates; it’s inside the gates, ready to devour an increasingly defenceless (and still fast-asleep) nation. When open military action begins, most people won’t believe their eyes – just like the history teacher in Red Dawn couldn’t, moments before he was struck down by Soviet machine-gun fire…

    1. That scene is still one of the most terrifying memories of my childhood! Crazy that it’s looking less and less like fiction.

    2. AMERICA will be the easrest nation the Russians and Chinese ever attacked,they watch TV,and they will try to surrender like the cowards they are,.,then they’ll all be herded to FEMA DEATH CAMPS TO BE KILLED…and inside the death camps they still won’t believe what their seeing till the day comes to DIE too…NOW you know why YOUR HERO”S want to take your weapons,THEIR ALL IN ON IT,and WAY to stupid to realize their turn will be coming…TO DIE TOO…a herd of sheep surrounded by WOLVES..KISS YOUR STUPID ASS GOOD BY COWARDS…

  3. Transport by air Chinese civilians.

    Fill up the easily taken land in the western U.S.

    Tell them, or force them to breed like rabbits.

    Make “peace” with the eastern U.S. ( give gifts).

    Don’t invade Taiwan, etc.

    Explain that we “just need food”.

    Pretend to have “conservative values”.

    Case closed.

  4. The huge, Yellowstone caldera has recently been found to be three times as large as first thought, and another one has been discovered in Utah. It’s over due to explode. When it does, the entire North American Continent, will become totally uninhabitable. Let them come.

      1. Trigo, we have been terrible at being the worlds police. we need to just defend America and rebuild the rational for a return to the Godly protestant foundation that the country was built upon. Returning and repentance is exactly what Martin Luther called for when the Muslim were Turks were on the precipice of overrunning EuroChristiandom.

      2. There was an article I read recently that concluded something along the lines that if corruption was entirely eradicated from Mexico, the government would collapse as there would be nothing left! Corruption riddles Mexico from top to bottom. The police are corrupt, the border guards are corrupt, the military is corrupt (tens of thousands of weapons get stolen each year by deserting soldiers and distributed to the cartels), the oil companies are corrupt, the businesses are corrupt, etc etc etc.

        What’s needed is for right-wing Mexicans to rise up and seize power. The cartels and corrupt politicians must all be exterminated. Alas, there’s no will for it in Mexico, and in any case, the only people who can become heavily armed in that country are the cartels.

      3. There press reports of US military small arms showing up at crime scenes

      4. The UN would have serious reservations at our invading a sovereign nations. That is a really great way to get American lands invaded by the blue helmets. No, we have to wait for it, but prepare for it. But, with the lack of strong leadership and the loosing battle of morals and national pride, we will have to either learn to speak Chinese, Russian, or Mexican Spanish. Oh, and what this article fails to say is, Canada has also sold out to the Chinese, so America is surrounded on all sided, with no one to call on, because of our arrogant pride.

    1. Right!, .. slightly more likely to explode next year than 50,000 years from now.

      Give me a break.

    2. There are hundreds of thousands of years between events of this kind. Even if it is overdue, the odds are against it happening in our time.

      1. There is no chance of anyone being killed by Covid, yet everybody buys it. The super volcano is more than enough pretext to invade, Mexico.

  5. I’ve watched this scenario building up for years and wondered why they took so long? After all, Xi promised to take Taiwan by 2020 and didn’t. How much face did he lose with that failure? Can he afford to wait much longer?

    I lived in San Francisco—it has no port any more, the port was destroyed by a communist led longshoreman union decades ago. The real port is across the Bay in Oakland. Other ports are found in Richmond and Stockton.

    It was in Oakland some years back, I don’t remember how many years ago, that a container was opened to see if its contents were the same as its bill of lading, and they were not. Instead were found 5000 AK47s and ammo. Within a couple of days, that news disappeared from the local news sources.

    I’ve been inside of warehouses where shipping containers were unloaded for distribution to retail stores. Even a fairly modest warehouse can store a couple of 40 foot containers with only minimal disruption of a front business.

    Remember when the U.S. invaded Iraq? What delayed the invasion the most was not getting the men over there, but in getting the supplies that the men needed over there. The PLA has pre-positioned weapons and supplies here in the U.S. so that their men can spring into action without having to wait for their supplies.

    As I envision it, the war will start with shock and awe as several cities are flattened using nukes. Some cities would be spared because they have equipment and supplies that the invaders can use and Chinese spies already know where are those supplies.

    Then while we’re still standing dumbfounded “What happened?” PLA personal disguised as students, tourists, smuggled-in workers at Chinese owned businesses will spring into action, empty those smuggled in containers and attack. Others will cross the borders from Canada and Mexico. Some will disembark from ships to secure the coast. Airliners will land able to carry more troops, because their supplies are already here.

    That’s just the opener. They need boots on the ground here to secure their victory, but can they keep them here? Stay tuned for further episodes.

    1. On that COSCO freighter you mentioned, not only 5,000 AKs, but 1 million rounds of ammo were found, there were also some RPGs. About half the crew were CCP para-military trainers, meant to train the gangs in the SF Bay Area and LA. Basically 5th column.

      1. Would love to see some evidence of this and other claims made regarding weapon caches. Definitely have not seen any of that.

  6. Washington is the #1 producer of apples, blueberries, hops, pears, spearmint oil and sweet cherries. The state is the #2 producer of apricots, asparagus, grapes, potatoes and raspberries in the U.S. Washington is the second-largest producer of wine in the United States, supporting 1,000 wineries.

    Plus a heck of a lot of high quality fresh water year round.

    1. Did You Know? 10 – 12 billion apples are harvested in Washington State each year. Each Washington apple is picked by hand.

  7. This is the type of writing I greatly appreciate. Getting down into the nitty gritty of things, things that some of us already know through years of research. Writing that is not afraid to underscore the true danger America and the rest of the world is facing. This is what is needed, a brutal honesty. No brushing things under the rug, no more pretences.
    What we are facing is worse than anything the world has ever seen.

    How would you get Chinese soldiers into the United States in the opening days of a war? How about under cover of a health crisis? Some are saying the vaccines didn’t come because of the virus. The virus came to implement the vaccines. I believe this hypothesis to be true.
    True evil is about to befall us, may God have mercy on our souls. Vivat Christus Rex.

  8. CCP develops COVID with aid of Fou-Chi and American tax dollars. We pretend not to see. China then releases virus and again we pretend not to see. The Biden administration covers up all information. Trouble is at our door step and again we pretend that it doesn’t exist. We didn’t see the attack on Pearl Harbor nor the grave threat of Nazi Germany. We supplied the Chinese with guidance systems for rockets and pretend we haven’t. Global warming is our number one enemy. We pretend the threat is not there. God help us. We’re pretending not to see.

      1. There are those of us that will respond to the aggression even though the odds are against us.

  9. Jeff, a very recent piece of disinformation.

    “In defense of silo-based MIRVed ICBMs”
    Pavel Podvig,

    “Well, there is precisely zero evidence that the Soviet Union ever contemplated attacking US silo-based missiles, whether as part of a first strike or in an attempt to limit the damage during a nuclear exchange. It built its MIRVed missiles for entirely different reasons.”

    “In reality, building a first strike capability what exactly the opposite of what the Soviet Union was about to do. Even before the Soviet Union embarked on its modernization program that will eventually produce its first MIRVed missiles, it initiated a thorough review of its nuclear posture.”

    “As for damage limitation and warfighting, Soviet MIRVed missiles never got anywhere close to that – throughout the 1970s they were not capable of taking out more than about 20 percent of Minuteman silos and could only hope to take more than a half of them in the 1980s. I would not be surprised if the Soviet Union never targeted US ICBM silos at all. What would be the point?”

    “It is a tougher call for the United States. On some level, US ICBM force is largely irrelevant. As I mentioned earlier, I doubt that Russia aims its missiles at US silos, so they probably don’t even work as a sponge. On the other hand, these missiles do have a non-trivial counterforce capability that would only increase if they were MIRVed (and there are enough warheads in the reserve to do so). And if the GBSD program proceeds as planned, this capability will be maintained for a long time. Add to this that the United States believes in damage limitation and relies on launch on warning that opens it to catastrophic accidents, and you have a picture of a pretty destabilizing and dangerous force. But is not ICBMs, MIRVed or not, that are the problem, it is the first-strike damage-limitation strategy.”

    So MIRVed Russian ICBMs,of which there are MANY, GOOD, MIRVed American ICBMs of which there are ZERO, bad?

    1. There is so much disinformation packed in those sentences. First off. Our ICBM silos are not really hardened targets the way Soviet silos are. Peter Pry discuses the imbalance which exists in the fact that 30 years ago we very few hardened positions while the USSR had thousands. They simply negated much of our throw-weight by hardening. We have had some improvements since, but we are still far behind them even now.

      1. The comment I remember ( I have forgotten which publication, and which year ) was that it would take two direct hits on a Russian missile silo to kill it.

  10. If the political willpower were activated somehow .. how many days working 24/7
    would it take to super-harden 100 silo’s?

    (let’s spend on infra-structure!)

    If 3 Trident subs are out of communication for 3 days – all subs can launch
    – if 7 officers agree. (hypothetical – obviously, cough, cough,)

    “Add to this that the United States believes in damage limitation and relies on launch on warning that opens it to catastrophic accidents..” Q. Given current in place tech. is this even possible in 2021, just wondering.

    Biden could say: The computer decides – 12 to 74 percent chance ( a random choice which changes every 5 seconds ) the U.S. launches on warning – we the people don’t decide anything, and it takes 3 weeks to dis-engage the system.

    Decrease predictability across the board – but not to intolerable levels.

  11. I am Canadian-born, living in Ontario. The feeling of imminent, irreversible catastrophe for this country is everywhere, particularly in those who deny it. The sense of impending doom is like a huge ripple through the air.

  12. June 15th is this Tuesday. It’s time for grey terror to turn into red terror. Time to watch for assassinations, revelations that will destroy credibility and trust of our leaders, a much more lethal form of the virus “mysteriously” appearing in America, increased cyber attacks on US infrastructure, power grids, banks, US government agencies, and the markets. False flags in the Ukraine and Taiwan and the Middle East to distract the US military,

      1. Attack on colonial pipeline. Attack on meat industry. Breakdown of supply chain. Rapidly spreading viral pandemic. Readying of Chinese and Russian forces. All these are to be expected in the period leading up to war.

  13. Good morning… i do some posting on a financial website where discussions sometimes turn political..

    Are we permitted to link to this website, if discussion’s turn in a strategic direction ( it happens frequently on oil related threads for example) or would that be something that would not be advised?

  14. To begin with an error at the beginning of your analysis, is to build an edifice of error, until the truth disappears from sight. And how do our lost conservatives go back? How do they retrace their steps? Who has the humility to walk back the last thirty years?
    J.R. Nyquist

    Let’s see some mea culpas, here and now.

    More trust and less disgust please.

      1. I wasn’t referring to you, it’s a quotation of something you wrote, that’s all.

  15. Jeff, do you have any definition for the term ‘Revolutinary Mentality’? Or, more specifically, what defines the marxist/communist revolutionary mentality?
    (I’m by no means any specialist on marxism, but it seems that the pretext of helping the ‘poor’ or ‘working class’ is just a pretext for concentrating power and seek destruction as an end in itself.)


    1. The Revolutionary mentality seeks redemption through collapsing the existing system. Generally, there are deep resentments in this mentality, often times you will find self-pity. The more naive partisans of the Revolution can be utopians who want a better world. Usually, this latter type become disillusioned. There are also revolutionaries on the “right,” like National Socialists or fascists. Some might say that they are on the left, too. The problem with socialism of every kind is the tendency to use the state to trample down individuals, to override checks and balances. Every socialist state tends toward centralization and autocracy. Checks and balances stand in the way of the great things they want to do for you. In reality, they do very little good and do a lot of damage.

      1. In the West, there are Gnostics who rebel against what they perceive as a fake/unreal/evil reality. In the East, the very foundation of societies paradoxically rest on the reality being fake/unreal/evil. Perhaps this is why Marxist cults found a congenial soil to grow in in Asia?

  16. Sounds like a dope dealer I knew. He had a perfect foolproof plan. So far all sides in conflicts receive major dsmage but this plan hardly a scratch? There is Red Elk saying about 8 years ago he saw visions of dead people being hauled enmasse ti midwest and asians and many nations for a while then the suddenly all left . Said he was going off line and preparing in area where earth is solid and safe

  17. Hi Jeff,

    I first learned about you and your writings a couple months ago while listening to Secure Freedom Radio.

    I was wondering if there is a .pdf version of The Silent Invasion, Scott Gulbransen? I tried finding a used copy, but I could not find it. There was a brief article about foreign troops spotted on the Mexican border in the Washington Times some time between 2003-2005. I’ll have to check my external hard drive to see if I can find a link.

    I can anecdotally confirm there is a Chinese immigrant community in Baja, Mexico. I worked for a company in San Diego and one of my co-workers was a Mexican of Chinese dissent who spoke, English, Mandarin, and Spanish. He opened up a little about growing up down there since I was familiar with the area and would sometimes joke with him in Spanish. He obviously didn’t say anything nefarious, but he is story caused me to remember the Washington Times article. That was a couple years ago.

    I’d also read an article about a huge bust on a house in Mexico City owned by a Chinese national who had pallets of cash, so I believe there are all kinds of operations going on against the US, but there are now real efforts to stop. I sadly believe we may have been divided and conquered thoroughly from with in.

      1. Hi, Jeff. I first saw you a few days ago on an interview with Mike Adams (Brighteon); fascinating show! I can’t get enough current info like that…keep it up!! Thanks. ALSO, like “Andrew” (6-13-21), I would VERY much like a copy of Scott Gulbransen’s book, “The Silent Invasion” (2003). Please keep in touch! —ScottMac

  18. Only thing that most people will know is that the electric power went off. They won’t know anything more than that for months to come.

    1. Re: Grid down

      Ted Koppel is in what mental space compared
      to The Duke of Wellington …?

      Maybe he should come back on the air and
      explain how inter-connected Russia, China,
      and the U.S.are in 2021.

      He might not use the word “probably” – then again stupid is a rock in his head.

  19. 1. There are nuclear weapons in Mexico, but they are now under the control of President Lopez Obrador, a crime fighter who made fast friends with Donald Trump.
    2. Phantoms & rumors aside, there is a REAL army in the North of Mexico headed by Governor Cabeza De Vaca. This existential threat to both nations is being dismantled by Mexico, and Cabeza De Vaca is basically a fugitive. Here is the rest of the story, and the articles that began international investigation into the Bush-CIA-Cabeza De Vaca connection:
    Missile bases of the Rio Grande (2-part)
    Civil War brews in Mexico, AMLO goes to Washington:

    1. Obrador is an old socialist who talks out of both sides of his mouth. One never knows whether to take him seriously. The Cartel controls entire regions in Mexico. Do you suppose Obrador really runs the country? Or does the Cartel run it?

      1. President Lopez Obrador (AMLO) and his Morena party do not have complete control, but he has pushed the cartels back into their strongholds where they continue to be protected by corrupt officials of the PRI/PAN/PRD party alliance. He has dismantled the corrupt Policía Federal and the cabinet-level commander of that force, and is recovering control of Tamaulipas, a state on the US border, from Cabeza De Vaca. AMLO is less than halfway into hos six-year term, and his party did well in the election held earlier this month. Mexico is advancing.

      2. The Cartels and the Mexican government cooperate with each other and only pretend to be fighting each other. The government looks the other way and the Cartels reward them for it.

  20. So now you have elucidated very clearly and concisely the plan of our enemies to destroy us. It is an excellent first step to know the motivations and plans of ones enemies. Now, what is your concise plan to save us from this country ending intention? We know that the enemy is within the gates in the form of a fifth column. We know now that our government and culture has been subverted almost to the point of collapse. We know that the Democrats have stolen our representation. Please go beyond reporting; we need a 2.0 plan, and you have the solid perspective to reach beyond and find it, if you will exercise the next step; vision.

    1. In this particular set of circumstances the “vision”
      will be the “organic escalation” arising from

      Proclaim the truth and do not be silent through fear.
      St. Catherine of Siena


    2. If I made a plan who would support it? I would need $11 million to build a small organization. Ten times that for a large one. Are you able to pitch in? Or are you just spitting from the gallery because I cannot leap a tall building in a single bound.

      1. I’m not sure; what would the premise of this organization be, and how would this effectively reverse our course and save our republic? I will pitch in to anything I think will be ultimately sufficient to be effective.

      2. By the way Jeff, your comment “who would support it” signals a kind of fatalism that stops effective action. If your plan was sound, and if it could be communicated strongly and effectively, and if people were led well, of course people would follow. Conservatives are starving for a tight plan and bold leadership. But it must operate outside of the political realm, which is effectively dead to us now due to the overthrow of culture, deadly effective propaganda, and the lefts developed ability to steal elections.

      3. It’s fatalism if I ask a question? I am stopping effective action? Why exactly is all this on me? I am telling everyone who the enemy is and how they operate. If they do not listen or understand I am dead in the water. Can you help out here?

      4. If I understood your comment, you said you would need funds to start an organization, but then asked the question “who would support it.” Are you asking for a profile of the person who might, or suggesting that you doubt that anyone would support it?

      5. Jeff, do you think that anyone will answer as a taker without your elaboration on your guiding philosophy and plans? Or are you afraid of the FBI knock on the door if you spell it out? Or is it just another conservative organization that will have little effect on culture or political power, that the left laughs at in their long march?

      6. I have written out my guiding philosophy for decades. It seems you have not bothered to read my books. Please Read “Origins of the Fourth World War” and “The Fool and His Enemy.” Everything is there.

      7. Everything except a cogent and clear plan. It’s all analysis.

      8. So the assumption you’re making is that you know all this, and therefore, knowing all this, what is your plan? You beat around the bush on the things that really matter, the seminal issues.

      9. Forgive my presumption in assuming that the republic can be saved, and by those concerned for its welfare. What a fool I have been…

      10. The Republic ended when Obama was inaugurated in 2009. If you are in any doubt, consider last year’s stolen election and the collapse of our rule of law. You also saw four years in which an elected president was called a Russian stooge by actual Russian stooges as he faced an insubordinate government.

      11. I’m sorry Bogdan, I had not seen your most recent post when I responded. I commend your intentions and actions; your heart is definitely in the right place. When we pull this ultimate plan together, we will need about a million well intention souls like you and me and Jeff to pull it off. But pull it off we will indeed, as the left has huge blind spots and they are very vulnerable to kinetic action, especially by the millions of gun owning Americans who are simply waiting to be led to victory. From there, we can extend this effort out to our allies, and we will.

      12. It would have to be based on the Underground movements in Europe during WWII. Although, even they had traitors to deal with as well. Having a small organization that is well funded would probably draw too much attention of the wrong kind.

      1. Saint Clair do you mean by your comment that I am trying to bait Mr. Nyquist into elucidating a kinetic plan of action so that he can be arrested? When my website American Renewal opens next month, it will become very clear that I will be making myself a target, and have no need to do that to others. I am more than willing to take that heat on to myself. The FBI has already paid me a visit, and I expect many more such visits in the future, of which I am not afraid. Mr. Nyquist holds his cards very close to the vest, I throw mine all out on the table for everybody to see. We are different in this respect, but I certainly have no need for him to go to jail in my stead.

    3. I think it is quite enough for Jeff to alert us to the strategies of China and Russia. So many in America are clueless and uninterested as to geo political affairs when it comes to a possible future kinetic conflict with these two mentioned countries. When considering the United States, you are considering a significant portion of our population that is just happy to play video games, watch entertainment TV, occupy time with social media on the internet and follow sports. Getting people to wake up to the fact that their lives could likely change when disaster looms is a huge hurtle. Normalicy bias is another obstacle because most Americans take for granted nothing bad will happen and are lulled into complacency. I feel confident in saying that the time to prepare as a nation is probably now beyond us in passing. The events that will transpire when events progress to crippling disaster status will propel the United States into utter loss of rule of law and extreme volatile chaos and panic. Awareness of impending doom can inspire people to be personally prepared so they are not caught in shock and surprise like 98% of Americans will be when things go down.
      I think it is also safe to say that conflict with China and Russia has already commenced in subtle ways like Jeff has pointed out from the defectors he studied that we are in the overture phase which comes before the all out war. We have already experienced the damage of asymmetrical warfare such as the whole COVID virus and interventions to combat it with lockdowns, business closures, loss of life, etc. We are being intentionally softened on so many different multi-faceted levels by deliberate and calculating efforts by both China and Russia. Our leaders would be very wise to be aware of the communist strategies employed by China and Russia that Jeff has continued to reveal after his meticulous and thoughtful study. When knowledge is present it can inspire nations and individuals to take proper and needed action to deal with the threats to our survival that loom.

  21. Robert Malins, you are kind of a blogospherian louse and it seems the the only purpose of your presence here is to tease and harass Mr Nyquist as you yourself have nothing constructive to propose on your own. What about helping Jeff by spreading his message on all the conservative blogs and websites (as I do), share the info about him with your friends and relatives (as I do). What about reprinting some of his articles, doing a few dozen copies and distribute them around your neighborhood (as I recently did). What about doing something really courageous and share your experience with Jeff?
    When I was still living in a communist Poland under the whip and the boot of a totalitarian regime i faced the situation when I had to be ready to sacrifice my life in order to retain the FREEDOM of my soul.
    Those have been circumstances that, most probably, you have NEVER experienced and neither do you have any idea what that looks like to find yourself in such a situation.
    I’m sure, Jeff would be more than happy if you could come out with something constructive instead of yapping without purpose.
    Greetings from EUNUCHALIA – Bogdan

    1. Bogdan, I would not personally refer to another that I do not know well as a “louse.” It’s bad form. And to diminish my opinion because I have not lived under communism is a moot point; being subjugated under its boot is not a badge of honor. That does not keep me from understanding its danger and wanting to see concrete plans of action to eliminate its threat. I don’t spread Jeff’s message because though it is highly informative, and is extremely important in context setting, it sets no methods nor actions for how to reverse our situation. For the entire duration of Jeff’s writing career, the hard left has advanced relentlessly forward. We have lost massive ground culturally and politically. Hence it has been in the main ineffective ultimately. I am looking for those who are willing to face the hard choices and to sacrifice their fortunes and sacred honor in order to save this republic. I believe Jeff has the intellect and the historical knowledge to be a part of this movement. So I’m waiting for him to start down this path, and my comments are meant to facilitate that. For this I will never apologize.

      1. Well then, dear Robert, you are very welcome to print, let’s say, a hundred leaflets with Jeff’s thoughts, spike them with your own proposals and distribute them to the people as they enter the city railway station while commuting to their work.
        Few months ago I printed 220 leaflets in which I accused my own DEGENERATE Victorian regime of Daniel Andrews of DELIBERATELY launching the COVID pandemic on the local population and during the strictest lock down in history of that pathetic country I was venturing around my district of Melbourne throwing them to the letter boxes. That carried some minor risk of being caught by VICTAPO as the local people call the Victorian police but it was nothing in comparison that you would face in a communist country.
        I admit that being subjugated by the totalitarian regime is not a badge of honor in itself, however it gives us an unique experience about how it works.

      2. However, I have also to admit that I’m very pessimistic about the efficiency of my own, otherwise, sporadic actions.
        I try to spread the message about Jeff and his website in popular conservative blogs and websites like Instapundit, Gateway Pundit, PJ Media, Breitbart and others almost on the daily basis.
        Unfortunately, the responses and feedback are so rare that they practically don’t matter.
        Still, i wish you a good luck in you eventual undertaking.

      3. It is my belief after decades of research and teaching the perils of communism that a plan presented ahead of time would be either laughed at or squashed, or both. There will come a time when many brave Americans will fight back. Plan for that time. Try getting to know your neighbors, your neighborhood and make a plan to put into action when the time comes. Until than, keep very quiet, head down and get prepared so as to not be a burden. It’s probably not going to be easy to get out of this alive much less alive and still living in a republic. Unless God intervenes. God help us.

      1. And Bogdan, what exactly did you accomplish by printing and distributing 220 leaflets? Who exactly used their message to extrapolate and carry out a plan that would thwart this globalist cabal and their plans? Do you think that you made them nervous? It will take much more than this, something more national then ultimately global in nature, something more far reaching. That is why I will take a hard pass on duplicating this effort. I do commend you on your bravery in doing this, but it is not far reaching enough.

  22. Robert, I agree with you: a plan is necessary. Leadership is necessary. Action is necessary. And we conservatives are sorely lacking that. We seem to be stuck. I think it’s a good challenge you pose to Jeff, but it’s not the job of Jeff, alone, to solve the problem. I

    ‘m sure he racks his brain, like the rest of us, to figure out what can be done to reverse the course of events. It’s good to challenge him to think in this direction, as it is to challenge all of us to think in this direction. But Jeff is not responsible for coming up with the answer, just because he’s super smart and knows history better than most people. It would be great if he could, but he’s just one man doing his best.

    All of us are stymied right now as to what action can be done that will change things. It’s as much your job, or mine, to come up with the answer as it is Jeff’s. We’re all in this boat together, and each of us contributes what we can.

    Jeff contributes historical insight and analysis. With God’s grace, a path will be shown, a leader or leaders will arise among us, and actions will reveal themselves that we can join together and do. Meanwhile, let’s challenge but not blame or harass each other or quarrel among ourselves. We are all brothers in arms.

    I would like to ask, Jeff, if you could sum up what your books say about your best understanding of what the path forward should be. You said “it’s all in my books,” but I think we all here would appreciate it if you could sum up your thoughts on any possible path forward and put them in this blog. No one (except maybe Robert) expects you to have all the answers, but any pieces of the answer you have managed to deduce, would be helpful.

    Thanks, and love and blessings to everyone who reads, writes, and responds here.

    1. Well done Gretchen!

      If I could wake up to a post like yours everyday I’d be more

      Without copying from Jeff’s “Origin’s of the Fourth World War”
      directly I can affirm a policy going forward using a specific idea of his:

      Pound it into your head fellow Americans that your subconscious
      estimation of the situation ( the presence of the Atlantic and Pacific
      Oceans has completely led you to a fatal belief ), it isn’t good
      enough to realize this truth and then forget it.

      Figure out on an individual basis how you will remember this idea
      so much that it starts influencing your day to day life.

      1. Robert, this is not meant as a complete refutation of your argument. I don’t know what the right way is. It is part of the western tradition, however, that rebelling against a legitimate government was unwise, (the American Revolution was another matter, as it was a war of secession by a colony rather than an attempt at real revolution). Shakespeare’s great tragedies, Hamlet, Macbeth, and Julius Caesar reveal this. Being the first to draw the sword might set us up for failure. I think Jeff once compared our position to that of Hamlet, who awaits the tyrant’s stroke, unwilling, for ambiguous reasons, to strike first. This may be part of why he is reluctant to strike the first blow in a civil war.

      2. Luke I understand this point of you, and I understand Mr. Nyquist’s holding of that point of view. I fear though that the longer we wait for the perfect confluence to come together, the more of our culture, traditions, and institutions will be stripped from us, and we m will have no support basis whatsoever to stand up at that point. The military is being actively subverted now and will be much more likely to stand against us in the future when it is drained of conservative leaning Americans. There’s nothing worse than waiting too late to take action, when it is within our power to take effective action now.

      3. You are not going to win over the undecided middle by going “kinetic.” And you are putting this site in danger of being shut down by this insurrectionists talk. I cannot have you here.

      4. Hamlet is the exact case. A nation is a family, like Hamlet’s family. The villain has the throne. Your own motherland is implicated in his crime. How do you set it right? You cannot begin slaughtering your kith and kin without proof; else you are thought a madman. Thus, the dilemma. Hamlet must wait for the right moment and avoid his uncle’s traps. Watch the play. “The play is the thing….”

    2. I do not want to address this because I have done so repeatedly without effect; but I will do so one more time as a courtesy. People hostile to our views control the media, government and education. Even the Pentagon is not friendly to our views. The only thing we can do now is spread the word and wake our countrymen to the danger. The hope would be that unfolding events — combined with the knowledge we have spread — will prompt the country to do an about face. If this does not happen then we will suffer heavy blows and will have to fight in place to defend our homes and country. If there were tens or hundreds of thousands of people coming to this site, and dozens of others relaying this same message on alternative media, there might then be the possibility of raising money to reach a larger public. I strongly object to Mr. Malins because he wants me to organize “kinetic” actions to save the country. In other words, he wants me to devise a civil war strategy. He therefore derides me for lack of vision because I will not do this. Just to be clear: Civil War is not something we should fight, since our external enemies will intervene on the left’s side and we would be overmatched. The correct and only viable strategy is to win over the country — left and right — and unify it. I am sick of repeating myself on this to Mr. Malins and have no time to waste on something that would only put me in jail and discredit my message. He has no judgment and no idea of the current balance of forces. He is pushing something that cannot work at this time

      1. And herein lies the rub . You and Trevor Loudon believe that we will be overrun by our enemies should we take up arms against the left in the U.S. You believe that as is and without doing so, we have a very small chance of surviving; Trevor says a paltry 2% chance of our survival as a nation outside of a totalitarian construct. And you both get angry because you don’t want kinetic action to “ruin our chances.” Don’t you realize the horrible box canyon you have put us in in your mind? There is almost no chance of survival but let’s not ruin our chances? Though we are at a deficit technologically in the nuclear balance I sincerely doubt that the Russians nor the Chinese would risk massive retaliation on their cities in order to intervene. You are assuming that there would be no way to keep control of government in a civil conflict and that we would be rudderless and vulnerable to attack. But let’s say that you are right. Since in your mind we have very little chance of survival as a free nation why not go for broke and take the greater chance that we might be ultimately successful and reclaim the entirety of our culture and republic in its original form? Your position is fatalistic and has very little chance of going anywhere we as conservatives would ultimately want to arrive at.

      2. Do not tell me what I believe. I have not put you in a horrible box canyon. I have no idea what anybody’s chances are. I am not angry because I don’t want kinetic action, Mr. Malins. (Yes, I recognize your writing style.) I have merely lost patience with your harassment. So I am kicking you off this site because everyone may not understand how malevolent you are, or how dangerous your way of talking. You have no proper appreciation for what the Chinese or Russians are prepared to do militarily. Right now America is understrength against Russia and China. It would be disastrous if we had a civil war and divided that strength in the face of our enemy. We must unite this country and marginalize the far left. Your ideas would have the opposite effect (egregious blockhead that you are). To arm one soldier today costs $50,000. I do not have the money to arm a single soldier, you obnoxious buffoon. And I am in no position to organize a civil war.

  23. Does anyone have knowledge of how many deaths the vaccine has caused? I saw a video where a cardiologist said there had been 6,000 deaths worldwide, but he did not cite a source for that information, and I can’t find any such information online when I do a search for “deaths from vaccine.”

      1. INSPECTORFOYLE and CONTEMPLATIVE OBSERVER, thanks. That’s just the information I was looking for. Of course, we’re seeing NONE of this in the media.

    1. Dr. McCullough said, in mid-may, 10,000 deaths in Europe, 5,000 deaths in the USA, with 10,000 hospitalizations here in US.

    2. Gretchen,
      You may want to to go to Diana West’s site and read her series titled TheScreamers, parts 1 and 2 posted on June 15,2021.-. Dr. Peter McCullough is also focused on in an article dated June 14, 2021.

      Certainly disturbing information, but necessary for the public to be aware of.

    3. On June 11th 2021, Dr. Peter McCullough shared his findings with the German Corona investigative Committee of lawyers headed by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. This is the full english language recording of his testimony with German translation edited out. There is a suspected 50,000 deaths due to Covid injection in the U.S. That is just in the U.S.–56—June-11-2021:6?src=open&r=8WbC57z5HFN9m8cuhY31p6wv6bHj575h&fbclid=IwAR3cbunR5O7DMLBgyjt6Tx6QcrrgCaXlny0cKaS7npWsPeWcNjzBL6DJKPk

      I am researching this heavily. The injection is the bioweapon and I believe things are going to get seriously worse. Dr. McCullough believes the injection is phase 2 of the bio-terrorist attack.

      1. Thank you very much for posting this interview with Dr. McCullough. I just reviewed it and he is saying, point blank, that the vaccine is phase two in a bio-terrorism attack in America. He says he does not know who is behind it. My work is the other piece to this puzzle. I have been expecting an attack out of Russia and China and their fifth column helpers here. Now we see what the attack is.

      2. In an interview not long ago, Bill Gates was asked about how many people worldwide would die from taking the vaccine, he thought about 700,000 would die. Was he lowballing it??

  24. Bogdan the Aussie – Thank you!

    May I make a suggestion?

    Just use the community boards next
    time, two clear paragraphs of Jeff’s,
    with only his name attached.

    In this age of distraction, seldom think
    people in general will learn or do
    anything – in other word use your
    time and money efficiently as possible.



    P.S. People ( the masses ) are open to clarity, as long
    as it does not seem you are selling something.

  25. So, … A nation – wide “we have all read the same pages” project?

    and agree to do the same actions and policies.

    The minimum amount of pages, possible actions, possible policies.

    ( a non-governmental, contract with each other )

    Or continue with the current process.

  26. The lady from the organization that is sponsoring the pastor’s U.S. tour said, “I’ll let pastor Pawlowski talk about his lion story, because it’s absolutely amazing. What we need is lions.” Great minds think alike.

  27. I agree with Gretchen that Jeff can do only so much. We need to have the people behind us, and we don’t. Even many of the “conservatives” are not on our side.

    To give an example, I remember that the state of California urged people to prep for two weeks in case of a devastating earthquake. But how many people have prepped enough for two days? I mean beyond the food on hand? Yes, some, but not many.

    Even now people look at us as out of our minds when we warn about the coming invasion. As a nation, we’re too proud. “We are the world’s superpower, no one dares attack us!” “We have the best, most powerful weapons!” So did Germany during World War II, but they were defeated. “Wd won the Cold War!” But already decades ago I noticed clues that the communists were still in control, clues that Jeff knows much more than I. As a nation, our people have been lulled to sleep by the propaganda organs known as the MSM (Main Stream Media), was that deliberate misinformation? The people will be on our side after the invasion happens, but then it’ll be too late.

    Jeremiah tried for two decades to warn his people that the invasion was coming, and his people didn”t believe him. Jeff doesn’t have the direct line from God that Jeremiah had. Jeremiah was told by God what the people needed to do in order to avoid the invasion, and they refused to listen. How many on this discussion list seriously believe that the masses of people that we need in order to be effective will listen to Jeff at this time?

    What we need is a spiritual revival that features a true return to the Bible. Like what we had 250 years ago. But today we have even too many preachers promising wealth to their followers, others claiming that their followers won’t see hard times because they’ll be taken out of this world, therefore this talk of invasion and prepping for hard times is foolishness, and that’s among those who claim to be Christians. The Bible makes no such promises. In their pride, the people listen to their preachers, both “Christian” and secular, instead of reading the Bible.

    Jeff is doing what he can, and I really appreciate what he is doing. But don’t demand an action plan from him when he, and I, know that any plan he proposes now has no hope of success without the mass of people needed to implement it aren’t there.

    1. R.O. It takes a very small percentage of the population fighting with all their heart to win back a country. You may be thinking in strictly democratic terms, which we now need to move beyond. We don’t need a majority or any place close. If just 3% of the conservatives in the country, approx.1,500,000 men, would commit themselves to standing with arms, it is more than doable. With another 10% standing in support financially and providing refuge, we would have a distinct and massive advantage. Enough to seize control of all the major cultural and political institutions in the country, enough to change the government without losing control of it, effectively holding off the challenge of our enemies during this transfer of power. The left in the United States is scared to death of this type of coalescing of conservatives into an actual battle strategy. They know they would lose and then will face trial for sedition, with many of them losing their lives as a result, and many others facing prison or deportation. We think that we are being overwhelmed because that’s the picture they have painted for us, and our conservative leaders have bought into this at least partially. It’s time to break out of this foolishness and realize the massive potential that our very well armed conservative movement possesses in this country.

    2. Malins wants a violent action plan from me. I make the following excuse: I have no tanks and aircraft at my disposal, so I must beg off.

  28. “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

    ― Mark Twain

  29. As much as I’ve read about communism and its long march one thing that has always nagged at me, why does it seem so unstoppable? Almost like a destiny. No explanation satisfied the nagging question. Our leaders didn’t see it, or too much hubris, spineless etc.. Why did it seem like our leaders were actually helping the communists? How could it be so all powerful?

    In my reading I came across a talk.

    This led me to more reading. People like Ted Gunderson, John DeCamp and Admiral Carrs own work which led me to believe communism is merely a “conspiracy within a conspiracy”. Russia could not have been built up to equal us in power without the financial backing of the west and China has been built up by the west purposely for what we are witnessing. The passing of superpower status over to China with the approval of the real powers that be in concert with the stooges in our government who are under their control not through coercion but assent.

    This is the endgame. Our military was their tool and now China’s military will be their tool for total world domination. It’s now time for China’s military to be used to enforce their worldwide rule being implemented through Covid. This is why China has been able to get away with coming here and buying the land near military bases and its other nefarious activities while we sit around screaming for someone to do something. Most of our leaders(military too) are and have been in on it. Their lack of action is because they know One World Government is the plan and has been the plan. All this China talk and “action” by the new Administration is merely a show in my opinion. Distraction.

    When looking at it from this perspective everything falls into place and makes sense. Although China is the enemy it’s not really the enemy. Power is being bestowed upon them like ours was on us. The real powers that be are hidden behind a ring of boogeymen or frontmen who carry out plans toward One World Governmet. Until we start calling these people out, I don’t even know all of them, we can never root them out.

    Ted Gunderson understood and was very familiar with Gulbransen’s experience. I would imagine now that he’s backed off he’s no longer being followed.

    Thank you.

    1. None of these people you list (as having figured out the truth) actually know Marx’s writings or understand the sociology of capitalism or the psychology of capitalists. Greed is the guiding impulse of the profit-seeking class; but greed only guarantees blindness to the other side of human nature (that is, the non-economic side, the violent side, the criminal side). The communists have learned how to use capitalism against itself. You and many others see it backward because you have not studied the history of communism carefully. Marxism is partly based on a profound critique of the bourgeoisie (and the ultra-rich). Marx knew the bourgeoisie were not capable of properly governing. Marxism saw the bourgeoisie as limited, narrow, half-educated, and monomaniacally focused on the nuances of business. Marxism saw the false consciousness of the capitalist. In fact, the capitalist class has no real understanding of the political. Their point of departures is the opposite of politics; for politics is about enmity, as Carl Schmitt demonstrated, and the bourgeoisie is about eliminating enmity through mutually profitable deals. Capitalism is a win-win view of social interaction; revolutionary socialism sees a zero sum game. There is, after all, for the socialist, only so much pie which must be properly divided. Therefore, the capitalist will never understand the communist. He will never see what the communist sees. Meanwhile, the communist knows the capitalist inside-and-out. Through all these and other complexities of theory and history, you have lost the thread of Marxism (unconsciously). By putting capitalism in charge of the communist conspiracy, you are inverting reality and inadvertently placing yourself on the side of the communists. The people the communist revile are the same one’s that YOU revile. You both think capitalists are responsible for the evils in the world. You even think the capitalists are responsible for the evils of communism! Isn’t that a curious inversion on your part? Do you know what a false flag recruitment is? Can you recognize an active measure? Communism is a theory of revolutionary destruction created by the malcontented bourgeoisie. (Marx was thoroughly bourgeois.) But that does not make Marxism a “capitalist” or “bourgeois” conspiracy. Totalitarianism, said Hannah Arendt, is a phenomenon wherein the atomized bourgeois turns against itself. It is the “anomie” that results from strict economic rationalism. The fact that some capitalists have sought to make money through communists, does not make communism a capitalist conspiracy. The fact is, some capitalists are positively stupefied by their overemphasis on economics. Capitalist economic rationalism has eroded away capitalist social instincts. What is the social IQ of greed, after all? Therefore, the Marxists have always outwitted the capitalists. And this is why. Marxism is based on lies, course. It is based on violence. It is based on false hope. But it nonetheless deploys profound sociological insights. It therefore obtains tactical mastery on the political battlefield. Capitalists only see the prospect of making money in China, in Russia, etc. They get sucked in. As citizens of the great plutocracy we are all obligated to participate in the death ride of capitalism’s economic optimism. And then these capitalists are finally cheated. This baffles them because they cannot understand why the communists would “cut their own throats” by ruining a good thing. Why kill the goose that laid the golden egg? But that is the goal of all communism. This kind of goose-killing has happened repeatedly over the last hundred years. Alas, as current events will show, the communists are the ones who will literally cut open people’s throats (in joyful malice). The capitalists will recoil in horror. But you do not understand all this. No! You cannot see it; for you have underestimated the communists in your own peculiar and self-contradictory fashion. In fact, as a bourgeois person yourself, you do what the big capitalists do. You dismiss Marxism as a nullity. You reduce it to an epiphenomenon of capitalism. And so, like many others, you have fallen into the fatal error of dismissing the reality of communism. It does not exist for you, because you cannot see beyond your own class and it’s limited worldview. It may be, in the end, you cannot understand what I am saying. But when your world lies in ruins, think on it again. Then your life-lesson may unfold before your eyes.

      1. Mr Nyquist, your reply is outstanding, maybe a bit of genius in it. Now I have to read your books.

        What you say in essence, if I understand it correctly, is Communism is NOT another capitalist plot to make money at the public’s expense. Communism is truly a thing in itself, at great enmity with Capitalism, which doesn’t really understand Communism. The latter has deep sociological insight about Capitalism, while Capitalism has virtually none about Communism.

        This reminds me of what one of my grad school professors said, Peter Berger, who was the top sociologist of religion in the world at the time and one of the greatest in the twentieth century, only exceeded by Max Weber. I heard Berger say Communism hated Capitalism because it ruined and destroyed community and social relations between people. Your references to social anomie alludes to this. Traditional religious pre-modern societies almost always maintained strong strong links between people and it protected them from the destructive and soul-destroying effects and affects of anomie typically characteristic of capitalist societies. Communism was a kind of religion without supernatural or transcendent elements embedded in it.

        Berger was no fan of Communism, and like you here, he saw it ultimately as evil, but like you imply here, he saw its appeal in trying to restore community that capitalism eroded or destroyed, and which the capitalist bourgeois failed to value enough to preserve. I never forgot what Berger said about this in class over 30 years ago. I found it to be so striking. And now, in your post below, you articulate in great detail much of what Berger was talking about! Heartfelt thanks for such an illuminating post!

      2. Thank you for mentioning Max Weber. He was an extremely learned and brilliant thinker. He died in the great influenza that followed the First World War.

      3. Woe to those who cause house to touch house, who cause field to come up to field until there is no more space, and you are caused to dwell alone in the middle of the land.
        Isaiah 5:8

        Today Bill Gates is widely considered one of the most evil men whose presence pollutes the face of the earth. He also owns more U.S. farmland than any other single individual. He uses his financial clout to drive small farmers off the land.

        This is NOT Adam Smith’s capitalism.

        Adam Smith’s capitalism cannot exist in a moral vacuum. Morality was just as important to Adam Smith as free trade. His book ‘Wealth of Nations’ was written in the context of his ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’. Morality is that taught in the Bible.

        You are right that the communists understand the bourgeoisie because they themselves are bourgeois. From the petty bourgeois of Mao Tse Tung (college grad from a shopkeeper family) to the super rich of Zhou Enlai (undergrad Berlin, graduate studies in France). Both examples from a time in China when fewer than 5% of males had any schooling.

        As I understand Stanwyck, his main point is not communism vs. capitalism. After all, many of those people running the major corporations are socialists, if not communists themselves. Major banks are included among those socialist supporting major corporations. This is not capitalists controlling communists, rather a convergence of both groups working together. Those major corporations are an economic fifth column destroying America. They are not capitalist, rather rapacious organizations out to destroy capitalism. They are working together with the communists to effect a communist take-over of the U.S. and of the world.

        That such organizations are called “capitalist” I see as part of the dishonesty of the left to muddy peoples’ understanding, so that they turn to socialism.

        Rather I understand Stanwyck to be referencing an occult conspiracy that includes the communists. I know you prefer not to go into such conspiracies, and I find them problematic myself. So I won’t say more.

      4. I think you misunderstand my comment. I am not anti-capitalist nor are any of the people I mentioned. I understand the evil of communism and have read many books on the subject but I am not as educated as you on the history and don’t pretend to be. I do not dismiss communism but the creation of it and the continuation of it could not have been sustained as Admiral William Guy Carr states in his history of the World Revolutionary Movement. It is the World Revolutionary Movement that created for the purpose of dividing communists/capitalists and sustaining the division, wars, and owning the leaders on both sides. Lenin was the head of the World Revolutionary Movement at a point. The question is who is the leader now?

        So I really did like your reply because you are obviously smart and knowledgable in regards to your topic but I think it was off mark in terms of my thinking and intent. The talk that I linked was given in 1958 a few months before Admiral Carrs death by natural causes but it was the culmination of his life’s work from I believe 1918 give or take. I don’t think you can understand where I am coming from unless you know his work.

        Communism is the conspiracy within a more evil conspiracy. I believe Admiral Carr’s work proves it.

        Thank you.

      5. I cannot remember the reply I made. I am sorry if my brief contradiction offended you. There are many many books purporting this kind of theory. I am afraid these interpretations are never borne out under close examination. I have spent time in research libraries tracing footnotes and facts from such books. Go to a research library and see for yourself. Rather, as I did, you will find disturbing facts that falsify many of Carr’s assertions. The Protocols (on which he relies) are a forgery, and it is proved. There is no valid evidence showing that Jewish cabalists control the world through the banks and Freemasonry. This idea is as probable as the assertion UFO aliens are controlling the cabalists. Invisible forces are invisible. It is absurd to discuss what nobody can see — except that it titillates the uneducated. Carr’s writings bring discredit on our cause. Hitler believed in this same kind of conspiracy theory. So you must forgive my impatience on finding it here. Carr’s thought is a kind of ideological pollution. It subverts rationality and confounds logic. Marx and his most talented followers were not people who could be controlled by capitalists or Jewish occultists or Freemasons. Psychopaths are not amenable to such constraints. To say that the Illuminati, as a group of Jewish occultists, rules the world through Freemasonry and the banks, is to reduce all history to an absurdity. Yet, If you are a true-believer in this “theory,” you will never give it up; for it grants the believer absolute certainty in a world of terrifying uncertainties.

  30. Kyle Bass: Communist China Controls 200 Sq Miles in Texas Next to Major Air Force Base

    1. When living in Texas in the early 2000s, I was living and working in the mid-Cities area just West of DFW airport. There was a large mosque there that has taken over a fairly large strip mall that had been anchored by a supermarket that had gone under. Next to what was now the mosque was a series of fairly large apartment buildings where most of the mosque’s people lived. They were in 4, 2 story apartment buildings with about 20 to 30 apartments in each. A woman I worked with, she and her husband were the only none muslims living there. She said she and her husband were talking to some of their muslim neighbors, who told them that they were all part of a muslim sect of assassins from Afghanistan. If they were up to anything they were very subtle about it. The woman told me that she and her husband were very disturbed learning about this and planned to move out as soon as the lease was up. The WTC attacks happened not long after. She said that she and her husband were going to report what they had learned about this mosque and the members of it to the FBI. As far as I know, nothing was ever done abiut it, as when visiting there up until recently, the mosque is still there.
      It is unsettling to know that the mosque is still there and that there could be many more of them throughout Texas.

  31. We’re doing such a great job at destroying ourselves (and imploding our institutions), seems like they might wait even a bit longer and have a softer target, still.

    For example, our own enforcement agencies are on the brink of wholesale targeting political dissidents; coupled with ostracization of vaccine refusers, seems there’s so much more room for demoralization and destabilization.

    Why go kinetic now?

    1. People are completely confused. Proper action requires clarity. Our leaders do not provide that. They add to the muddle. Until this changes, actions will tend to fail, and failure engenders demoralization. I point to Mike Lindell as an example. Good intentions are not enough. You have to know what you are doing. His coming failure will demoralize the right.

      1. Thank you. FWIW, I am able to share your lucid and sober analysis with a few family members productively, where I generally don’t make much headway.

        The prospect of an imminent (open) attack brings things into stark relief. If we’re headed to open warfare, a goal must be to maintain confusion over the real enemy (possibly harder with foreign troops on our soil?). Seems like ginning up the right must figure into this. There’s got to be a reason that cynical political and bureaucratic authorities are hitting so hard with the fear-mongering around “white supremacy” and “insurrection.” It feels like we’re being shoved into a premeditated uprising (or the accusation of one), which, when it erupts, might soften a faction within our country to WELCOME some sort of active invasion, under a humanitarian or “restoring democracy” pretext. Create internal allies for external “help” in “transforming” the nation.

        In another comment you mentioned unity is key, i.e., relying on civil discourse to persuade our fellow citizens, one fact and one argument at a time. That is so critical, even if it feels impossible. We’ve been provoked in such a way that it WOULD feel impossible — that’s what demoralization is; but standing together is our only hope. If we go kinetic on each other, it makes successful invasion and control all the easier. Makes me think the next few weeks are huge risk for a domestic false flag.

      2. Yes. The theme of unity at the beginning of a war is extremely important. If the enemy’s subversive divide-and-conquer strategies succeed, our defense will be difficult.

      3. I encourage readers interested in this question to read the writings of Sharon Rondeau. She has clarified the problems regarding Dennis Montgomery’s claims, and the work of Mary Fanning. Mike Lindell has, unwisely, embraced Montgomery’s dubious information. This will seriously damage Lindell’s court case.

  32. Robert Malins, I wish you would do us all the kind favor of shutting up. It irritates the ever living starch out of me to read your asinine comments to Mr. Nyquist, trying to get him to make statements that *you* want him to make. This is his site. He kindly posts well-researched information, well-thought out conjectures, possibilities, theories, hypotheses, to give *us* information to do with what we will.

    I have no idea why you persist in badgering him to be the next George Washington or Robert E. Lee. Besides, if someone was seriously going to lay plans to take kinetic action, posting it for all the public to read would be one of the stupidest things you could do. Ya big dummy.

    1. Besides, what kind of battle plan can anyone come up with? The enemy is everywhere, in every institution, every government entity, every neighborhood in America. The enemy is sown in our midst, as the tares were sown in the wheat. To fight and win a war, you start at Point A, and advance until you have destroyed your enemy, or beaten them into submission. But how is that possible when our enemy’s are so interspersed among us? Best thing you or anyone else can do, is be prepared within reason, and be ready to defend your own home turf. Above all, be ready to face the Creator.

  33. There are people who read Jeff’s writings like Frank Gaffney who are connected to think tanks and government officials with the potential to change things. With the theft of the national election all that’s left is the Civil War and states seceded from the union. In the meantime china and Russia are even now making plans to invade. The only action that seems logical to me is to get prepared as best you can for the breakdown of the just-in-time supply system. And to add a spiritual note my hope lies in Jesus Christ who is preparing to return and put an end to this madness down here. If you’re not right with Christ you’re not ready and if you’re not prepared to die you’re really not prepared.

  34. I am under the impression that in nine out of ten cases I deal with windbags who do not fully realize what they take upon themselves, but who intoxicate themselves with romantic sensations. From a human point of view this is not very interesting to me, nor does it move me profoundly. However, it is immensely moving
    when a mature man — no matter whether old or young in years — is aware of a responsibility for the consequences of his conduct and really feels such responsibility with heart and soul.
    Max Weber

  35. Deep breath JR, I’m a retired SOCOM guy and found your intel extremely helpful. Keep it up!!!

  36. It’s time to think like foxes and have the courage of lions. The solutions will become apparent at the proper time for the bold and faithful to the Lord. Remember Proverbs 3:5-6 Trust in the Lord with all your heart and Lean NOT on your own understanding. Acknowledge Him in all your ways and He will direct our paths. Think of all the great moments in history, where Providence prevailed. Think and be not afraid.

    1. ladyfromlibertygarage ,
      Very well said. Thank you for your comment.
      God bless you and God Bless America.

  37. I will go out on a limb here as an old guy offering a questionable perspective regarding course of action. We live in a highly technical era totally dependent on every electronically controlled grid whether it be utilities, communication, surveillance, finance, logistics, mobility etc.. The best time to have done something would have been between McCarthy and Johnson. “Why?”, you may ask. Well is has nothing to do with the timing or the people. It’s more about the circumstances. Folks were still using a black desk phone. TV was limited. Newspapers and magazines were slower than the internet. And people still had town hall meetings and the PTA was the school voice rather than the federal government. Where am I going with this? Don’t laugh. Take down the entire grid – everything. Turn the lights out, bring everything to a halt – vehicles, finances, logistics, surveillance, TV, internet, schools, government. Now nothing moves and it’s door-to-door canvassing and organizing and back to the underground movement. Hit and run. Oh but there would be so much collateral damage. There will be collateral damage if we sit on our butts. This is war. The vast majority of people fighting us now will die; and we won’t have to worry about them. We can concentrate on more important targets. Think this won’t wake people up and mobilize them? the only people that might have access to technology would possibly be military – maybe. The enemy already has plans to take out the grid. Let’s use it to our advantage. Blind the eyes that follow you and you’re in business.

      1. Such an act, if I understand rightly that you are suggesting we take down the grid ourselves as a military action, would lead to mass death so horrible that it would totally remove any justice in our victory.

    1. Ultimate primary impact of shutting down everything is majority of the public – except preppers – starve to death in les than two months.

      1. Justice…hmm yes. Where in this country does justice even exist? At some point in our soon-to-be-history one of several things will certainly happen. The demon left forces of evil will make every attempt to eradicate both Christians and Jews along with right wing Americans. Or…there will be a uncivil war much like the blue and grey. Or…much of the population will die from manufactured crises. Or…foreign enemies will wipe us out. Or…because we deserve it, God will drop the other shoe. Aside from all our other grievous errors we have not only thwarted true justice, we have perverted it as well. And because we refuse to clean up our own act we are destined to reap the whirlwind. I’m a firm believer in the bible; and I saw this coming back in ’74. I try to be realistic. There is every reason to right our situation while acknowledging the possibility of failure. It is not possible to reason with the opposition. We are the authors of our own demise no matter what course of action we take. Collateral damage? It’s going to happen one way or another; and there is absolutely no way to prevent it.

    2. I too, have thought of this. Go after the tech that they use to supress and manipulate with.

      A preparatiory item though is to have what is needed to live in place that is EMP hardened. This is a big nut to crack. Where do you get gas for the car if it survives. How do the livestock eat with no feed. Then how does one fix up a cheeseburger?
      Simple items, and maybe my simple mind, but you have to look at what we invested in with using silicon based chips holding the keys to the kingdom that might be the kingdom who makes us slaves. Books are old school, and so are DVDs and CDs with the CLOUD. Alot of our technologies of the old ways are not around in hard copy, but in digital form on the internet.

      So, to go this way, and survive individually, and the family and branching out to the group and larger, we would have to have in place some infrastructure in its own right, before the button gets pushed.

      ONE SECOND AFTER was a good book explaining how it might look. Bleak, and well, not the best scenario unless many others were prepared for doing without, and also these others having stocks put up so that the rebuilding era could be done and a sane Governing body based on founding principles we all know of be put back to work.

      I did not mention the idea of the fight for freedom, there is this too. But with their gizmos and gadgets gone, it would be easier, if planned out, for the patriot.

      I think we have been sold a bill of goods on this computer stuff. I like the old ways and rotary dial!

      1. Hi Chris. Nice to see you posting here. The problem of EMP is a big one. I hope they don’t use that kind of weapon. How will I write my essays?

      2. Lot to think about for sure. Thank you. This is an excellent think tank. Thank you J.R.

  38. Those who favor kinetic action now, stop and think. As stated by Robert Toombs, first Secretary of State for the Confederate States of America, those who fire the first shot, lose the moral advantage. That’s why he opposed the attack on Fort Sumter in 1861.

    If there’s a civil war in the U.S., the leftists need to start it. And they just may. Those who want to preserve this country will have to stand their ground, refuse illegal “laws” and edicts by scofflaw politicians, but don’t fire until fired upon or the equivalent.

    If we try to start small with kinetic action, we’ll be like John Brown at Harpers Ferry—though many people opposed slavery, they didn’t flock to support him because he initiated violence, which most people also opposed.

    Rather we should be like the Minute Men at Concord Bridge, who refused to obey an illegal order given by the British officer. The first deaths were of Minute Men. Then shooting British soldiers was recognized as returning fire, not initiating fire, against scofflaw British forces who were shooting to enforce illegal actions.

    What will be the trigger event that starts the civil war, if there is one, I don’t know. It may be the illegal confiscation of weapons, like the British did at Concord. It may be the government sending in their Antifa thugs to burn down a new neighborhood. Whatever the action, it must be recognized as armed aggression against us at which time many people will recognize that it’s armed aggression against them too. But if we start shooting first, we’ll be seen as dangerous kooks, like John Brown.

    I think Jeff is doing the right thing here in opposing kinetic action at this time.

  39. re the calls for ‘kinetic’ action:

    those who call for war have never been in war.
    because if you had, you would be doing everything
    possible to prepare.

    1. and resolve the matter peacefully.instead of attacking scholars.

      (sorry, smart phone wasnt being to smart)

    1. The Democrats have been making anti-Russian noises since Trump was elected. This actually is not new. Please remember that they were saying Trump was a Russian puppet.

  40. Thanks for yr reply about Mike Lindell.I googled the lead-attack on Montgomery and it seems to be pretty foul-mouthed.I guess we’ll see then.But i have another question:Why does it all start with an emp?Wouldnt
    this give the game away?The emp takes place 30 minutes (or longer) before the main onslaught.Isnt this enough time to launch retaliation?

  41. Mr. Nyquist, I’d like to reply to some comments you made in reply to my own, perhaps I can elucidate things. If there was an misunderstanding, I’m inclined to believe I am more at fault. So you stated;

    ”Such warm feelings you have for my country in its desperate hour.”

    My love for America is deep and on a personal level.

    ”And to think how we poured food and war supplies into your country, in massive quantities, in 1942, 1943, and 1944, etc. Yes, in Russia’s hour of need we were sending all we could. Of course, you will dance on our grave, believing the hateful lies of your neo-Bolshevik government.”

    Without getting too far into the political historiography of the Great Patriotic War, I’ll say that Russia paid in blood many times over, facing and crushing the majority of Axis forces.

    ”I understand you perfectly. And you liken NATO to a gaggle of vultures! But isn’t Russia playing the vulture, as you confessed at the end of your last paragraph? — with the Chinese missiles wrecking the US Navy in the Pacific, and the Muslims paralyzing Paris and London? After that, Europe will be ripe for Russian dominance.”

    I was speaking more in a broader historical context, a longer chronological sweep. But I’m glad you mention the Muslims in Western/Central Europe, they are critical to what I am wanting to say.

    ”The double-headed eagle will then have its fill. Oh yes, you see the situation clearly.”

    Recall earlier comments I’ve made about Russian Autarky and ”Petrine Delusions”? Russia was enslaved to a Germanic dynasty for over 300 years, and the Great Game was played with Russian blood and treasure (not a big fan of the Romanovs/House of Oldenbourg, Holstein-Gottorp branch).

    The West has been in a fatal trajectory since 1054 AD, Russia just had the misfortune of being caught up in it’s spiritual implosion. I want Russia sealed off as much as is practical, sealed and purified.

    ”So please be honest. Do not play the victim. It’s so predictably socialist, and so undignified.”

    Socialist slogans sound nice,but i’m no Socialist. It’s not worth the price.

    ” Let us go over the balance of forces in Europe, and see what the fools in Brussels have to compare with the riches of the Kremlin. First, Moscow has assembled the equipment for two Guards Tank armies! Yet you make it sound like NATO is militarily threatening Russia and not the other way around. Do you think I cannot read military tables of organization? Russia has 20,000 tactical nuclear weapons preserved from the Cold War. NATO has one or two hundred (held back in the UK). And you write as if NATO’s forces in Estonia threaten St. Petersburg. Hilarious! Estonia’s military is minuscule and incapable. And it would be suicide to reinforce that hopeless position. No NATO force deployed to that indefensible protrusion could hold. The same is true of the other Baltic States and those symbolic little regiments rotating through Lithuania and Latvia as a tripwire! There is no Wehrmacht poised on Russia’s border. Oh no. ”

    So at what point should historically aware Russian citizens be concerned? When Georgia, Belarus, and the Ukraine become NATO members? When Polish troops occupy the Kremlin again?

    Maybe with the Ukraine and Turkey becoming cozy?

    ”The few Polish brigades in Poland cannot even defend the approaches to Germany properly, and are incapable of attacking as their composition is for holding actions only. The Baltic States have the shabbiest tiny infantry formations. France’s Army needs two years of readiness training before they can match Russian troops; and besides, the French are deployed defensively behind the Rhine. Germany’s army is not in working order. Spain and Italy have only light rapid reaction forces to send, and these could never stand up against Russian armor. In fact, Putin has bragged that the Russian military can occupy five NATO capitals in 72 hours. And you, Vladimir, are knowledgeable enough to know that Putin was telling the truth. So I can only think that your professed fear of NATO is a cynical, mocking, pretense. ”

    It isn’t at all, for reasons I’ll address. But before I do, you of all people know how people are actually hostages when it comes to nuclear missiles and nuclear war strategy.

    ”And I really do not appreciate your deceitful likening of today’s Muslim-ridden Europe to Nazi Germany in 1941. You have totally destroyed the image I had of you — as an honest person; for you could not be so misinformed as to believe that NATO has the power or the mentality to repeat June 22, 1941. You are too intelligent to be so poorly informed. ”

    You mention ”Muslim-ridden Europe”, as well you should,for this is the core of my concerns for Russia and the whole world. Think of all those millions of military-age men flocking to the West. They have ”the power and the mentality to repeat June 22,1941.” There is my focus. What shall fill the shells, the emptied out forms, of the Western political institutions? Islamic institutions. Hitler said that Europe should have been Muslim for a reason.

    Western Europe will fall to Islam, in our lifetimes,with a nod and a wink from the Elites. Russia has enough problems in the Caucasus and Central Asia, and where will the line be held in the West when the time comes? The Elites around the world don’t seem to have a problem with Islam,I don’t know. But,it’s the perfect form of social control of the masses, and gives the work of the revolutionary a spiritual sanction lacking in Atheism, gives them a long term stake beyond their lifetimes, and thus patience. Even China should really be alarmed at this as well, facing demographic collapse too.

    1. As an American, whose country has been very generous to Russia, I felt your comments like a slap across the face. Russia is not some Orthodox exemplar, full of holiness and grace, any more than the West is Christian in the old sense. For you to regard Russia under Putin as Orthodox is a bad joke. It isn’t only the West that is afflicted by modernism and false Christianity. Russia has the same exact affliction, however differently it has manifested.

      1. Mr. Nyquist, I have had occasion on the comment sections of your Blog, to feel a bit emotionally raw myself, and perceived as a bit ”sensitive” in certain areas of conversation. What I find interesting, especially in the context of this particular essay, is a bit of curious reversal. Russia has been invaded countless times in it’s history, even as it expanded to cover roughly one-sixth of the world’s land surface, and basically the geopolitical Eurasian Heartland of Mackinder, Haushofer, etc…But here we discover a fear or concern that eventually America will find itself invaded too, conquered, destroyed, and not from within, either.

        I assure you, my comments were not aimed as anything like a ”slap in the face”, on the contrary, I share your opinions on the challenge of traditionalism versus modernity, for the most part. Modernism does afflict both Russia and America, in different ways.

        Am I biased because of my Russian Orthodox Christianity, perhaps, but maybe in a good way, that might be insightful on some level. I don’t particularly care about today’s politicians,ruling through the forms of representative democracy, of a republic,on behalf of an Oligarchy (which is the perversion of Aristocracy, I agree). But they don’t make ”Holy Rus” unholy to me, anymore than the Soviet Union or the Romanovs did. Why? Because of the millions of Saints and martyrs, who Confessed the Faith or shed their blood on this land, who lived and died, hearts full of prayer and quiet Christian hope, living with an endurance and also a love of life that few other cultures can express. Their prayers will have a hearing before the Lord. And there is still a remnant there, holding fast to what they received from the Apostles. It reminds me of the story of this Icon;

        The holiness and grace are there, alongside the sin and grime, stupidity and cruelties, but redemption too.

        Let me speak of America also; I absolutely cannot hate America in any way, shape, or form. I see paradoxes in American life; a conformity amid a great deal of structural freedoms, contrasted with Russia and her extremes of Anarchy and Statism. Very different outlier nations out on the edges of the White Christian civilizational experience centered in Europe, but nations that have never been enemies in a real sense (one can be the enemy of an Ideology and it’s purveyors without being the enemy of the nation organized by some modernist ideology). Both nations considered rude and somewhat barbaric and vulgar by Europeans; cowboys and cossacks, tatars and indians.

        Some time back, I mentioned about each nation having a special mission from God that they had to be true to or eventually cease to be in any meaningful sense. We don’t have to like our present day modernist leaders, I suspect that you do not either. A nation without a purpose of a spiritual sort sinks into materialism, into decay.

      2. Yes, Vladimir. My feelings are raw at the moment. I see a war of mass destruction being prepared against my country. To celebrate Russia in the same breath that America’s fate is left to China, sounded like triumphalism.

    2. I’m really sick of your boring propaganda and proselytizing for Orthodoxy. Just knock if off, okay?

      1. Why don’t you explain in your wisdom why you think what I say is ”propaganda” and why you think Orthodox Christianity is wrong. Then I’ll reply. I’m not here for emotional excitement, but apparently you’re all emotional about this. Get a grip,these issues are for serious people, this is a ”Website for patriots who think”.I’ll let Mr. Nyquist and not some ”Anonymous” in cyberspace determine if he’s at an Impasse with what I say..

  42. There’s a certain irony that California is one of the states that is quite leftist, and it’s going to be one of the first targets of an invasion by communists who will show no mercy towards the people over there who hate the country as much as the invaders..

  43. Mr. Nyquist, you said;

    ”Yes, Vladimir. My feelings are raw at the moment. I see a war of mass destruction being prepared against my country. To celebrate Russia in the same breath that America’s fate is left to China, sounded like triumphalism.”

    I cannot share in any triumphalism,and want only peace, not war, which only benefits the partisans and thugs of the Devil.

  44. Mr. Nyquist, can you make it to where your content can be shared on Gab? I believe you would quickly increase your readership there.

    1. I second this. Additionally, If somehow you managed to get on popular right wing shows, such as Louder with Crowder, you’d also be able to reach an even wider audience.

      1. Alright everyone, let’s try to get Jeff on Louder with Crowder. They have 5M+ subscribers and 1M+ avg. views per video on youtube. Let’s ask them to have Jeff on as a guest for their show.

        Here’s their contact page ->

        Here’s their twitter page ->

        And here’s their facebook page ->

        Note: do not post a link to this blog on their contact page – they have a spam filter and your message might be blocked.

    2. I will look to see if my software is compatible with the gab app. I am sure you can share it in Gab by cutting and pasting.

      1. I have noticed that Andrew Torba shares posts from common posters on a regular basis. I will tag him in a comment to see about him helping facilitate getting you set up on there (Gab). Maybe he will see my post.

      2. I have it on my phone. It was not in an app store. What I had to do, was to go to, I believe, and download it. I then created a shortcut from my homescreen. I’m not too savvy about all of that stuff, but if memory serves, that is how I got Gab. It’s a good resource, and I believe a good way for someone such as yourself to get your message out to an even larger audience. At least, I think it’s worth a try

  45. I read an article 20 years ago that had been translated from Chinese to English and sent to me by a fellow political commentor. That article simply laid out the desired plan to use the greed of the US leaders, both political and corporate, against themselves to take control of the US. I knew then that this simple truth was the downfall of America. Crony Capitalism knows only the bottom line and whatever it takes to achieve it, where Capitalism has constraints and regulations. The US system has devolved and concentrated itself into Crony Capitalism and its IQ is solely based on profits. This is why you have businesses who think nothing of using Chinese and Mexican slave labor, moving jobs away from the US, and dealing with beasts they know will bite back. Their arrogance is centered around their inner circle and they create a bubble where it is impossible for them to see a consequential effect to their business actions. A one world government is supported for its ease of business for them; consolidating their power and opening up an economic gold mine of forced global consumers. One corporate entity who controls food production, one for textiles, one for entergy, etc. all bypassing individual Country’s regulations and egos and answering to one cohesive power structure. It is the stuff of wet dreams for big business and the perfect lure. This global cabal truly believes it can out-think Communism at its own game. Once, however, this global framework is achieved, then comes the night of the long knives and China will end the useful idiots in a way that is inconceivable to these global intellects of business. Like Jeff has said, they can not conceive nor understand the ways of Marxism and Communism.
    To me, it has always been very simple. Money and power to lure the weakest and softest minds among us to ruin. I know some very affluent people and without a doubt they are the weakest minded and too arrogant to see it. This is why the middle classes must be destroyed fore they always breed innovation and are the keepers of a Nation’s patriotism and checks and balances.

    At this point, our Nation’s situation can be simplified down to two realities.
    One, our Country has been thoroughly purchased through the greed of our leaders in business and politics and all that is left is the softening of the masses to take the Nation down.
    Two, we actually have intelligence left in dark corners of our leadership who value the Country over the cash and are playing the ultimate strategic ruse on China. (Don’t laugh out loud Jeff)
    (This “ruse”, at this point seems more likely to come from Russia after the destruction of America. Putin’s glimmer in his eyes as he spews the virtues of Trump to fan the fires of division tells me as much)

    Actually, the opportunity lies now greater then ever in history to rid the World of these Communist oppressors. When one moves to destroy a superpower they present great opportunities. Those in the dark have to expose themselves for brief periods and once large scale plans are implemented there are short windows of vulnerability. For all that hope in small windows, I fear those intelligent and wise enough to do it are on the other side of the razor wire marked for destruction. Whatever the reality is, a great battle is coming. It hangs in the air, thick with every breath.

    1. From some of their recent comments, it appears that China and Russia already view themselves as victors over the United States. As any student of history knows, in the end, the victors often turn on one another. Jeff, do you think the Chinese and Russians fear being double-crossed by one another, and that this is perhaps what has delayed a full-on assault against the United States up to this point? Yes, Marxism unites these two powers, but a whole host of things separates them— not the least of which are nationality and race.

      1. I hope that Russia and China turn against each other; but I do not believe they would so easily forfeit their coveted advantage over us. Beijing and Moscow have dreamed of this moment for many decades. I expect they will grind us down while they can.

      2. It’s too bad the true patriots in our government don’t try to run an operation like this, to make Beijing believe Putin has made racist remarks about Xi behind the scenes, or vice versa. Something like this would not be difficult to do, for the right people. Once a seed of doubt has been planted, it is almost impossible to uproot. Often doubt takes on a life of its own, far beyond all expectations. The true patriots in our government could use the same tactics the Marxists have employed against us all these years: use racism to divide what is currently united— in this case, Russia and China.

      3. Kristen: I’m more a student of history than of prophecy, yet there’s a prophecy in Ezekiel 38–39 of a war that either I missed when reading history, or it hasn’t happened yet. It mentions a confederation of many nations, not just Russia and China. Near the end of chapter 38, in verse 21, there is the statement “a man’s sword will be in his brother’s side” indicating in their moment of victory, they will turn on each other.

        Looking at the Russia-China confederation, it doesn’t consist of Russia and China alone. It includes Muslims of Turkey (for all practical purposes), Iran, the “-stans”, and within Russia Chechnya and Xinjiang in China, and parts of Muslim north Africa. There’s no love lost between the Muslims and the communists, theirs is an alliance of convenience. Both believe that they are to rule the earth after the victory. The last statement is a recipe for them turning on each other after their victory.

        Then within the countries there’s a simmering hatred of their leaders that threatens to break out as open revolt. I know more about China than Russia, where the extremes of grinding poverty and extreme wealth and corruption of the communist “princes” drives much resentment. Right now the PLA (the CCP’s army, not the people’s army) holds the people in check, but if their iron grip is loosened, an example of being out of the country fighting foreign wars, will the people see this as an opportunity to revolt? Especially if the PLA suffers major defeats in their foreign wars?

        I think that the main thing holding them back is tactical, not a fear of double-cross. Russia wants western Europe. If the U.S. is attacked, NATO has pledged to retaliate. But with the mechanized army, the tanks need solid ground for their operation. In other words, they are waiting for the ground to dry out so their tanks can roll over the fields, and not be bogged down in mud. That should be late July or August. They don’t want a repeat of their defeats during the Winter War in Finland, where their tanks were rendered largely useless by being trapped on the roads while the battle spread over the fields and in the woods.

  46. After the United States is long, gone, Russia is eliminated by the dictator of Europe, and the China, perhaps allied with India and Pakistan, attack Europe. When Christ returns, they all join forces against the Messiah. Big mistake.

    1. You have it all figured out; too bad it bears no relation to the Scriptures or the teachings of the Early Church.

      1. And you are dead wrong on both counts. It is in scripture, and it was taught by the early Church. Russian Orthodoxy has serious problems with the teachings of both.

  47. I’m not sure how familiar you are with Carr’s work but he absolutely does NOT believe jewish cabals are the driving force of this group. He actually goes out of his way to make this point and expresses that it only creates division and is absolutely false. No, he does NOT rely on the protocols and actually provides proof that they are fabricated to create a false narrative.
    To smear his work which he spent years researching, and verifying with actual documents is a testament to the pride of our time. He presented nothing he couldn’t verify. His work evolved over time as he researched and he admits when an earlier theory was wrong and explains why based on new information he unearthed.

    I was not offended by your response but you do seem to jump to conclusions at a rapid pace. Maybe I am not expressing myself to be properly understood? If so, I apologize.

    I’m amendable to being persuaded my beliefs are wrong and I do believe what Commander Carr asserts. But… I really would like people to deal with the facts of his works not the smears made against him.

    Thank you.

    1. Last night I reviewed an article by Carr in which he relies on the Protocols. After WW2 he changed his formula, as did Nesta Webster, because of the Holocaust. I will link to the article.

    2. I am shocked that you would assert the opposite of the truth. Evidently you have not understood that Carr is writing about a Jewish conspiracy. The publisher of his posthumous books was Noontide Press, run by the most notorious antisemite in American publishing, Willis Carto. You really have to understand the background of the writers and publishers who present such ideas. This is the ground of a rabid antisemitism. When Carr writes about the “Illuminati,” he means Jewish Luciferian occultists. He claims the conspiracy started in Heaven with Satan’s rebellion and then “was establshed on this earth.” He wrote that the scribes and Pharisees were the Illuminati of Christ’s day. He adds that the Illuminati killed Christ. Thus he wraps his conspiracy theory in the New Testament, and blames the Jews as Christ killers. He repeatedly refers to the “Synagogue of Satan” which is an antisemitic expression of longstanding. His books are full of historical inaccuracies. Carr argues that the plan referred to in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was formulated before the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati. In fact, he borrowed heavily from Victor E. Marsden’s English translation of the Protocols when he writes of an earlier, “Fifteenth Century ‘Protocol.’” Without any citations or documentary proof, he stated that Amschel Mayer Bauer (1743-1812), who started the (Jewish) House of Rothschild in Frankfurt, was responsible for plotting the French Revolution. Relating to the Protocols, Carr wrote the following: “I am satisfied that the documents [the Protocols] which fell into the hands of Professor S. Nilus in 1901, and which were published under the title ‘The Jewish Peril’ in 1905 in Russia were an enlarlgement of the original plot.” This is a direct and approving reference to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. So I do not understand how you could have read Admiral Carr without knowing he was describing a Jewish conspiracy and that he credited the authenticity of the Protocols. See his book, “Pawns of the Game” (4rth Edition, April 1962), page 31. (P.S., The purported August 15, 1871 letter of Pike, which he also refers to, has also been proved a forgery, written decades later.) This kind of literature appears credible only to those who already believe these things without needing proof. Perhaps you are not a very attentive reader.

      1. William Guy Carr Introduction to Satan, Prince Of This World:

        “I wish to make it clearly and emphatically known that I do not believe the Synagogue of Satan is Jewish, but as Christ told us for a definte purpose it is comprised of “Them who say they are Jews….AND ARE NOT….AND DO LIE. ” (Rev. 2:9 & 3:9). I hope I prove in this book that the Protocols, which contain the details of the diabolical plot Weishaupt revised and modernized between 1770 and 1776 are NOT those of the Learned Elders of Zion, but those of the Synagogue of Satan based on the Luciferian ideology designed to bring about a One World Government, the powers of which will be usurped by the High Priests of the Luciferian Creed who have always secretly controlled the Synagogue of Satan at the top.”

        Page 155:

        “Thus the lecturer proved that what I said about the conspiracy in the previous chapters is true. What he said proves that the Protocols were NOT drawn up by the Learned Elders of Zion for the information of those who attended the Zionist Congress at Basle, Switzerland in August, 1903, as has been claimed by those selected to lead the anti-Semitic phase of the Luciferian conspiracy”

        Mr. Nyquist wrote:
        “argues that the plan referred to in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was formulated before the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati.”

        Commander Carr wrote Page 155:
        “The Conspiracy ante-dates Weishaupt. The Synagogue of Satan, which Christ exposed , goes back further than the days of Solomon. It goes back to the time when Satan first caused our first parents to defect from God for the purpose of preventing our putting His plan for the rule of the Universe into operation on this earth. ”

        Page 146:

        “When Nilus published the lectures as part of his book, The Great and the Little in 1905, as said it exposed :The Jewish Peril,”, he set the world on fire. Intentionally or otherwise, he gave birth to anti-Semitism as the S.O.S. intended, so they could use it to foment World Wars One and Two and bring about the Russian revolution, as required to further their plot.
        My information about Nilus’ part in the publication of the “protocols” was published in 1955 in Pawns in the Game. Since then, I have learned considerably more about this remarkable man. He told three different stories to three different people, when asked to explain HOW the lectures first came into his possession. THAT IS NOT CHARACTERISTIC OF AN HONEST MAN. ”


        I could give more quotes but I’ll leave it there for now. My question for you, where are you getting your information and do you understand what you are reading?

        Furthermore, who or what proved Pikes letter to be a forgery?

        We are in more than a materialistic war it’s actually much more spiritual and those so tied to the material world have to understand that Commander Carr will describe events in regards to the spiritual realm.

        Thank you.

      2. It is standard practice for this kind of conspiracy theory to deny that it is anti-Jewish. I have had anti-semites make this same claim — that they are not opposed to the Jews — then turn around and talk about Israel as the “footstool of the Antichrist.” After WW2 it became important for these writers to obfuscate the anti Jewish subtext because of the Holocaust. Hitler’s crimes made these positions unpalatable to most readers. Willis Carto would not have published Carr’s material if the true subtext was not anti-Jewish. It helps to know the full range of falsification, relationships, etc., and the backtracking changes made to subsequent works and editions. Nesta Webster’s books were clearly anti-Semitic before a certain date. Later her whole conspiracy narrative was rewritten and recast to hide this.

      3. So you are theorizing that because this man published a book 20 years after the authors death that would make the dead author guilty of anti-semitism? The earliest his books on these subjects were published was 1955. The book I quoted from was published in 1957.

        Page 184 of Pawns in the Game(1955):

        “Therefore to charge this diabolical conspiracy as a crime against the whole jewish people and their religious leaders is unjust. I am supported in this opinion by one of the highest ranking intelligence officers in the British Service. He studied the matter in Russia, Germany, and England.”

        Yours is not really a knowledgeable response. It’s simply a way to end the conversation without proof but rather smear.

        However, thank you for your time.

      4. Carr was gaming his antisemitism, revising it by excusing most Jews. He had to do this after the revelations of 1945. The emendation of the original theory was as follows: Only the elite Jews are to blame, and they are not really Jews because they are not believers in Christ but belong to the Synagogue of Satan which crucified Christ. Such is the mantra. Of course, those grisly images of piled corpses at the German concentration camps forced such emendations of the theory. Yet it is the same false theory based on the same poor scholarship. Denying its antisemitism is deceptive, because that was not the original form of it (or the original spirit behind it). But you will not understand me because you believe so strongly in it. You are committed to believe that the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers and Freemasons rule the world through a massive conspiracy. I tell you it is nonsense. The Marxists are our enemy, not Jewish bankers and cabalists (from whence we get the word “cabal”). Beijing and Moscow and Havana and Pyongyang are threatening us. Red China is not a puppet of Jewish finance capital. But you will never acknowledge this.

      5. Mr. Nyquist,

        You are wrong and are misrepresenting what I believe. I have not and Commander Carr never made the accusations you are accusing us of believing and secretly hiding. There is no point further in having a discussion on a subject in which you are completely ignorant but yet in which you so strongly claim to have knowledge. I believe you are the one with difficulty understanding and strong preconceived notions.

        There is irony in all the insults you have rolled out in the course of this conversation.

        According to your standards in 5-10 years your life’s work and this site will have been a breeding ground for anti-asian, anti-slavic sentiment. And by your standards I’ll say they will have a good case to present. Try as hard as you might all your effort will mean nothing. Keep that in mind as you continue to work.

        Again, thank you for your time.

      6. The term “Synagogue of Satan” has been around since the late 90s, the time when John wrote the Book of Revelation. It is found in the letters to Smyrna and Philadelphia, and references those who claim to be Jews, yet are not.

      7. Synagogue of Satan refers to all Jews who disbelieve Christ. In other words, all non-Christian Jews; or, in plain language — Jews.

        Yet the Jews are Jews, and this a Christian metaphor rebuking the Jews. Yet they are Jews in the sense of our secular understanding, which says that all who identify as Jews are Jews, even if the are and they are not. But here is a theological dispute. To actual Jews, who say they are Jews, this Christian definition merely counts as anti-Semitism. Of course, this touches on very complicated political and religious issues from the Roman Empire.

      8. Jeff, scripture explicitly disagrees with you. Understand, this is not my writing, but two of the letters Jesus dictated to John. Here is the two passages in question.

        To the Church in Smyrna

        Rev 2:8 “And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write, ‘These things says the First and the Last, who was dead, and came to life: 9 “I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. 10 Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. 11 “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death.” ‘

        To the Church in Philadelphia

        Rev 3:7 “And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write, ‘These things says He who is holy, He who is true, “HE WHO HAS THE KEY OF DAVID, HE WHO OPENS AND NO ONE SHUTS, AND SHUTS AND NO ONE OPENS”: 8 “I know your works. See, I have set before you an open door, and no one can shut it; for you have a little strength, have kept My word, and have not denied My name. 9 Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. 10 Because you have kept My command to persevere, I also will keep you from the hour of trial which shall come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth. 11 Behold, I am coming quickly! Hold fast what you have, that no one may take your crown. 12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name. 13 “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.” ‘

        Your argument is not with me.

      9. You opened the question and I simply pointed out your mistake. It is a very common mistake.

  48. Trigo. I am having trouble approving your three links. The system constantly undoes when I hit “approve.” Very frustrating. I will keep trying.

    1. “Google censors and jams certain sites.” says the person with zero knowledge of how the web works. Most website errors are caused by non-professionals who build their own sites, temporary large-scale outages in platforms or hosts where the cause is determined, or faulty local wifi. Literally the last thing it would ever be is invisible censorship. There is no conspiracy against you.

  49. Jeff, any comments or insights on Putin’s press conference today?

    1. I was more amazed at Biden’s outburst, in which he admitted he had no confidence he could modify Putin’s behavior. There was real frustration there.

  50. Jeff, Any comments or insight on Putin’s press conference? Also, why is no one reporting on the consular office in Moscow being reduced 75% and Americans having to leave if their visa has expired?

    1. Putin gave a strong post-summit performance in his press conference, despite some early groping around. He was served up easy questions by the Russian media that allowed him to portray America as a major violator of human rights. He had some very tough questions from the American media. He oddly praised Biden as an experienced statesman and seasoned politician. He graciousy brushed off references to Biden’s past insults, which made him look gracious and reasonable. He would not name Navalny during the questioning, and in response to questions about disallowing protests in Russia, he mentioned the folks jailed in Washington on January 6 saying that his country merely takes similar measures to prevent disorders. He was smart and sensible in his answers, and careful to avoid too many outright lies. Whether it matters or not, he apparently got Biden to agree on an extension of the New Start Treaty for another five years. It is very difficult to read Russia’s intentions from Putin’s statements. He was stiffer and more tense than usual, which may be a bad sign in terms of what is coming. He gave away one tell, by shifting on his feet, when he was first asked about Ukraine. It was his biggest outright lie, I suspect. He had a cold start at the beginning of the press conference, stumbling around. But he got his focus and had a great deal of carefully prepared rhetoric, with points that could not be easily rebutted. It was an artiful presentation to the Russian people, I think. They will certainly feel good about his leadership if they believe his words. He made the Arctic military buildup sound like an exercise in safety and environmental protection. He stuck to exculpatory technicalities on Navalny, said the talks were “constructive,” blamed the United States for everything, and also blamed Ukraine. The big surprise for me was his lip service to global warming. This is something he has not always done in the past. Clearly, he was trying make a friendly gesture to the Western liberals. It was a remarkable performance in many ways. The American press, with few exceptions, does not appear to have bought his act. That last question to Biden about Putin’s unrepetent ways, was telling. Biden erupted in something of akin to a fit. It was one of those revelatory moments that underscored a deeper layer of tension. What is really going on here? Biden did not seem to have enjoyed the process. he looked weak in comparison to Putin. I’m not sure this meeting accomplished anything for the West. If anything, it made Putin appear in a better light. Perhaps Russia wants to avoid blame for something that is about to happen. This is a guess only. Putin denied any Russian involvement in the cyber-attacks on U.S. infrastructure, and he suggested that most of these attacks are originating inside the USA. Of course!

      1. Do you say it like this because you are absolutely certain without any doubt that there are no cyber criminals based on the USA? We are a cyber criminal free nation?

      2. I would like to comment at the risk of sounding foolish; and I’m amenable to criticism. Regardless of the intentions of Putin and Russia, I have to admit that I like and respect the man. He has a protective interest in the welfare of his country unlike the vast majority of America’s leaders whether they be federal, state or local. Is there any country that is truly free? Is there any country that does not subvert the welfare of its citizens. America certainly isn’t above reproach. But the real tragedy is that our leaders are actively engaged in our destruction apart from the desires of Russia, China and Islam to hasten our demise. Worse yet, we have been responsible for the degradation of societies worldwide as a result of our moral values. And now, we have progressed to the point that there is no way to recover. Every country relies on a certain amount of criminal element (whether ideological or otherwise) to enforce its rule. We simply masquerade ours as democracy. Ideally America would utilize the dedicated patriots in our society to effect positive change. Unfortunately, the worst of the worst is programmed to destroy us from within as Khrushchev promised. I realize the vast majority of our leaders have been compromised. And most are influenced by greed and an elitist attitude. I think if we were to be dominated by anyone other than ourselves I would prefer Russia for the simple reason that they look for people that excel and foster programs that will be of benefit to the country’s welfare and stability. You say Russia and China kill their own. But so does Islam and America. Personally, I would prefer that American patriots rise up to the defense of our country. But there seems to be excuse not to do so. If we’re going to be overrun, I would prefer it to be by Russia. That’s not to say I won’t fight it. It’s just that if we lose, I would prefer Russia rather than China or Islam. I’m open to criticism on the matter. Understand first, however, that I am a hawk by nature and willing to defend our country even though I’m old and tattered.

      3. Putin protects his country after a fashion. Yes. But he muzzles his countrymen, murders the truth-tellers, and governs by deceit and violence. So then, how good is he for Russia? A powerful image may not be good if the underlying reality is corrupt.

      4. Ah yes. And are we any different at this point? Don’t misunderstand me. I want nothing less than to regain control of our heritage as it was designed, though I believe it cannot be done. We profess to be free on the surface; yet it is a delusion. Where do we go from here? We are the authors of our own destruction and, like it or not, perhaps we deserve a wake up call.

      5. I have no disagreement with that. Corruption is corruption regardless of the origin. Every power that ever existed was bent on world domination, insofar as they considered the world, before each was stopped short of achieving their goal. The reasons were varied but the effort was expended all the. Currently there are five vying for control with five others of little importance that are only sideliners. The problem is that three of the major players are out of contention for the golden ring; and America is one of them. It is the sheer greed and stupidity that is sinking our ship. I can think of only two people in recent history who saw the writing on the wall – Buchanan and Perot. When America was of one language and one vision we were unstoppable. When the universal trade language was English nothing was impossible. That doesn’t mean we were always looked upon favorably. It simply means we had an edge. Now we are a rag tag band of misfits ripe for the picking.

      6. So what exactly is the implication of him suggesting most cyber attacks originate in the US? Of course he’s exaggerating, as all politicians do. But what is your response to Putin’s allegation that 35 cyber attacks from US sources were requested for investigation in 2020, and 25 the year before, with no response? Why when the US has a few complaints about cyber attacks is it world headline high priority news but Russia dealing with dozens more attacks year after year is brushed off as unimportant or worse during a globally watched summit? Why would they ever capitulate to American demands when we don’t even acknowledge theirs?

      7. I do not have an answer. What Putin says may be technically true, and may also be misleading. These things are difficult to determine. I take a larger, strategic view. I know what he is aiming at. I know that he lies. I know he prepares to defeat us. This much I can demonstrate. Some details will never be know for sure. Never take your eyes off the big picture.

      8. I get that – the big picture is important. But don’t forget that there are many details of the big picture that are impossible to see. The truth remains that we are all human, we feel human things, and we are limited by the human world. This combination makes V. Putin essentially just another lawn mowing, weight lifting dude. While he holds power that very few hold in the world, he is scrambling to make sense of it the same as we all are. The same as Joe Biden is. The same as Xi Jinping is. Their political ideologies obviously lie far on the spectrum from yours, but what would be their motivation for conspiring to destroy America and possibly the world? More power? More domination? They already dominate their immediate worlds. Why would they ever risk that for probable chaos? Other than being psychopathic madmen, which is not what I see in Putin, there is virtually zero incentive to create mass violence. This fact feels overlooked often on this forum.

        (and if the inevitable starvation by the Chinese due to environmental factors is their incentive, then we should all be sharing and discussing the proof of that inevitability first and foremost. but that is only hinted at here, as a foundational motivation for China to invade our territory.)

      9. Communism/socialism is a powerful atheistic religion. You have been taught that it is no longer a factor in world politics. But it is the biggest factor. You discount it’s power at your peril.

      10. This is where I think your intellectual error exists. The “power” of communism (defined as: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed) is very personal to you. You’re more ready than most to denounce the entirety of the concept to the world of Evil. You consider it an “atheistic religion” which, in order to rationalize, you must make mortal enemies out of countless people and their representatives, who go about day-to-day life never once impacting your life personally. To me, this is odd. You bear your fears day after day with words intended to incite some kind of action that ultimately serves the purpose of weeding out these nefarious actors who puppeteer political events, somehow in an ever-successful way, and make tools of all those who dare empathize with their fellow human being living in peacetime. More confusing yet, this group includes those that consider the actual teachings of Jesus, who is supposed to represent Christianity by the way, the only true gospel.

        How do you reconcile an emotional departure from fellow Christians who don’t see the same enemies that you do? What community in which you engage informs you to concepts that reinforce your spirituality? Do you have one?

      11. Hmmm. Seems we’ve had over a decade of crackpot ideas destroying our country. And it’s coming from us.

      12. Avoiding the questions I see. Too on the nose for you to address? Too difficult to reconcile? I understand.

  51. “Hal Lindsey “ wrote the “Late Great Planet Earth” several years ago.


    For those who may not yet have noticed: Among the Russian delegation was also Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, General Valery Gerasimov – in uniform, of course! But allegedly, there were no threats issued… – Come ooon.

    Also, Putin’s separate press conference given inside the mansion (while Biden gave his out in the brutal summer heat!) was like one of his routine Soviet-style press conferences back home in Moscow. And there was a bomb shell, hidden in plain sight: Having first picked two Russian journalists, he then chose CNN’s Matthew Chance: saying,

    “Let’s give the floor to FOREIGN JOURNALISTS. CNN! Matthew Chance!”

    Putin is himself abroad, on Swiss soil. If he addresses an American journalist in a press conference on Swiss soil as a “foreign journalist”, he implies that the location, Geneva, Switzerland, is Russian territory! And that’s how the so-called Russians (read: unchanged Soviets) have indeed been viewing Western Europe for a long time: as their own property!

  53. Excellent article! However, after reading it, a question emerges: are you safe, Jeff?

    By the way, if possible, I would like to ask about your opinion about these articles:

    1) “Communism and Anticommunism
    on the Threshold of the Millennium’s Last Decade” – Published on Wall Street Journal on 27th February 1990.

    Curious note about it (Google’s translation):

    “A significant echo of this manifesto was the letter addressed to the American TFP by Mr. J. F. Steft, Deputy Director of the Office of Soviet Union Affairs of the North American State Department.

    On the part of President Bush (father), he offers arguments against the theses supported by our message. This in part where I launched an interpellation to people, institutions, parties, government personalities, governments and international civil and religious organizations in the West that incorporated collaborators for the maintenance of the communist regime.

    This argument by the US State Department agency was politely expressed and expressed high regard for the work. The American TFP responded in an equally lofty and polite tone. But this exchange of correspondence went no further” (Source: book “Minha Vida Pública” [ENG: My Public Life])

    2) Rethinking China – Published on internet on 21th April 2020

  54. Nobody is safe. Everybody is dressed up like Antifa. Antifa can run amok with impunity. Anyone who looks like Antifa can be charged with assaulting police and eluding. Or are masks to appease Islam?

  55. China is part of the “socialist camp.” Russia is part of the “socialist camp.” Cuba and North Korea are part of the “socialist camp.”…American Democrats are part of the Socialist camp!

  56. EDDIEHNATKO You are a fool. Putin is a murderer. An atheist and communist.

    1. I understand your ire; though I am not really a fool. If we had some sort of leadership I would be out fighting in an effort to rid our country of the evil that has befallen us. Tell me this. Is not our own government murdering our own? Are we not becoming atheist oriented by our own hand. Are we any different from those of whom we are wary? Have our churches fallen away from God and Christ? I will die in the fray; and that’s okay. At least I will go down fighting. I have no problem with what you are saying. I only meant to imply that given a choice I would rather suffer under a government that doesn’t mask its identity than live under one that pretends to be holier than thou.

      1. “Regardless of the intentions of Putin and Russia, I have to admit that I like and respect the man.” You are a fool.

  57. Do you like or respect Moa or Stalin? Kim in North Korea seems a fun guy to have a beer with?

    1. No. I don’t respect the three you mention; and I am not a fan of any form of dictatorship. I would prefer that we go back to our original design. I doubt that will be possible. We have gone past the point of no return. No matter what we decide to do in an effort to regain a semblance of that which we were, I feel the intermission is over and we had best take our seats to see how this plays out. Meanwhile, when someone yells fire try not to get crushed by the mob.

      1. We are not free to go backward, but only forward — into decadence. We are facing a breakup of civilization followed by a reformation. Are you up for it?

      2. I don’t see a reformation, Jeff. No sir. Only grief and despair for those opposed to a world dictatorship and a fearful joy for those who go along with the program.

      3. That’s an optimistic view considering the length of time they actually do last. And, yes, the world will change and, in fact, is changing for the worse. Farther back in time Churchill, Patton, MacArthur and McCarthy all saw it coming. But that was back when we could have done something to change the course of history. Too late now. We/the world are in a downward spiral of death and destruction. Will it eventually end? Yes, but only when the Lord God Almighty puts a stop to it.

    2. Hey, I heard that Pol Pot used to play pool with Mao Zedong. What I’d like to know: Did Pol Pot have to lose on purpose? Or did he ever dare to win?

  58. Mr. Stanwyck,

    I wanted to address certain part’s of Carr’s narrative concerning Sergei Nilus and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion;

    ”Page 146:

    “When Nilus published the lectures as part of his book, The Great and the Little in 1905, as said it exposed :The Jewish Peril,”, he set the world on fire. Intentionally or otherwise, he gave birth to anti-Semitism as the S.O.S. intended, so they could use it to foment World Wars One and Two and bring about the Russian revolution, as required to further their plot.
    My information about Nilus’ part in the publication of the “protocols” was published in 1955 in Pawns in the Game. Since then, I have learned considerably more about this remarkable man. He told three different stories to three different people, when asked to explain HOW the lectures first came into his possession. THAT IS NOT CHARACTERISTIC OF AN HONEST MAN. ””

    Sergei Nilus collated the writings of Nicholai Motovilov after Motovilov’s death, Motovilov being a disciple and primary source of the life of Saint Seraphim of Sarov (Motovilov pushing for Seraphim’s canonization,which happened in 1903). Nilus wrote spiritual works himself, and was quite erudite and wise after a fashion. He was definitely not a naive man, whatever else one may think of him and his ideas. Sergei Nilus is the main source of the prophetic legend about Saint Seraphim that St. Seraphim will be raised from the dead during a time of great spiritual decline, and lead Russia to repentance, back to God.

    Russian Orthodox Christians of the official church are generally very extremely hesitant, despite the Nilus connection to the Protocols, to cast doubt on the man Sergei Nilus or his character.

      1. Mr Nyquist, why are you listening to this person, Vladimir? He is a liar, a deceiver. He is here to lead people astray. Some of his comments have been downright dangerous.
        You have honest people coming on here, searching for the truth.

        Jan Malina was right all those years ago. I tried to help him when he was in prison, then before he disappeared. Afterwards, through a lot of research, I found many of the priests he had been in contact with within the SSPX, mysteriously died.
        Every single thing Jan Malina wrote was the truth. Your work is part of that. What he didn’t realise of course, is what has happened over this past year. He did warn of similar things and that faith will guide us. It certainly has in my case.
        There is only one true Faith, one true Church. That is the Catholic Church. I have been listening to an interview with Harry Wu. As you know, he was a Catholic. His account has deeply moved me and strengthened my resolve. It has also shown me the methods being used against us.

        What Vladimir speaks about is false. I would like to bring your attention to the following Top Secret STB Policy c.j.
        CB-00 2040/0389, that was issued on 11-28-1989, that is AFTER the so called
        “collapse of communism” in Czechoslovakia, in one of its articles we can read
        the following:
        3) Top priority and essential tasks for our STB activities
        Section b) Operations:
        ….. through our influential network subdue attempts of the reactionary
        church officials to activate political clericalism that’s supportive of the
        right wing opposition movements and groups.
        It is my humble opinion, this is what Vladimir has been doing. Although there are no reactionary church officials here, his replies to certain people here, follow this policy.

        I admit that I am scared, for I know what we face. It would be wrong of me though to hide in fear, while others bravely try to spread the truth, even at the cost of their lives. These are truly evil times. We are to be prudent, but…It is our duty to God-to warn and instruct properly our fellow men….as true charity should also direct them to do…. 
        I have done everything that I can to learn the truth and to share with others what I have found. It is time for me now to focus on my children and to prepare.
        I pray for your safety, but most importantly, I pray for your conversion to the true Catholic Faith, without which there is no Salvation. I pray that true men of God will rise up and fight with valour, for Glory of God, Church and country, against this communist scourge.

        ‘In this battle there can be neither neutral nor the undecided. What is needed is a Catholicism which is enlightened, convinced, without fear, a Catholicism of faith and action, of feelings and works, in private as well as in public..’ Pope Pius XII
        We will be victorious, for God will be with us.

      2. I am a Protestant. My theology is different from yours. This site is for anti communists from all backgrounds. I hope you understand that I am not going to discriminate against Orthodox Christians. I have friends who are Catholic and friends who are Orthodox, yet I am neither. This site is not a place to make religious arguments. I seek to unity with all those who recognize our common danger. I wish people kept it to the subjects I cover, but they keep intersecting theology. This will only divide us. As for enemies and their tricks, let us be smart and show that we will not be divided. In this way we can learn from our enemy, who always has things to teach us. We do not have to believe everything that is written here. The important thing is to think things through, a process Americans have not practiced much.

  59. I’d rather have the Chinese in charge than the traitorous, scheming, glutonous jews that control America from top to bottom. Ol’ JR always conveniently leaves out how the Rothschild jews own it all.

      1. To your reply to my comment.
        I am not an American. I am very much accustomed to thinking, it is how I got here.
        Your criticism of me is unfounded. I was tired of the comments section being filled with Vladimir’s Russian Orthodox ramblings, so I decided to say something. He has criticised the Papacy and the Blessed Virgin Mary. Yet any criticism of his orthodoxy is met with contempt. Surely I am not the only one who thinks this. I would rather talk about the matters at hand, which is why I try to share things I believe to be relevant.
        I will stand by what I said.

      2. I did not intend any criticism of you. And I have no contempt for you at all. I think your concerns could be justified. Do you notice how religious quarrels erupt here constantly? I am worried this is intentionally being provoked. Traditionalists and conservatives often come from different traditions. How do we manage this and form a common front against the communists? All these heated disagreements give me a sick feeling — that we are all absorbed in the particulars of our separate faiths, unable to unite against the communist divide-and-conquer game. I appreciate your faith and sincerity. I have great interest in Catholic ideas. As it happens, I have been attacked here on my own website by Protestants who accuse me of sympathizing with Catholics. Now, perhaps, I am being too tolerant of the Orthodox. I do not want to be in the middle of a religious war. It makes me very uncomfortable, as you might imagine. Here, the subject that I care about — our common defense — is constantly being drowned out by various religious confessions and conspiracy theories. These take us away from the danger at hand. Through all these recent posts I find myself discussing topics that leave no room for my own subject-matter. I am criticized, as you see, if I do not agree with this or that idea or theory. Who shall I censor? You must forgive me if I want to draw Vladimir into a discussion to learn — either from him or about him — and discover what he thinks. It doesn’t mean I am going to convert to his way of thinking. If he is trying to manipulate us, time will reveal it. I let communists post here because I sometimes like to answer their slanders, and give people a taste of the hate mail I receive. And yes, there are traps being laid by other people who post here, and there are many deleted posts you do not even see that are very nasty; troll stuff, sometimes having to do with religion or antisemitism. If I say yes to the wrong thing, or I am not careful, people come right after me. I get attacked quite often, and it is preferable to see it here where I can answer — rather than somewhere else where the enemy’s thought process remains hidden. This is a battle of ideas. One ought to engage.

  60. Ohengineer, you said;

    ”And you are dead wrong on both counts. It is in scripture, and it was taught by the early Church. Russian Orthodoxy has serious problems with the teachings of both.”

    Orthodoxy and the Early Church are One. But if you’re right, you should have been able to name those teachings contrary to the Early Church or Scripture held by Orthodox Christianity, right?

    Aside from that, you’re defending what ‘another’ said, that in the End Times, America will be ”long gone”, Russia will be conquered by the ”European Dictator”, and China and some Islamic countries will basically be running amok. I’m no genius, but I am a skeptic of this fairy tale.

    Kindly show from the writings of the Early Church (which do exist!) and/or from Scripture where this God-awful mess of false prophesy or pure speculation has any standing in Christian teaching. Or even in any secular political or military literature instead.

    1. You can dream on. I will say nothing beyond that as Mr. Nyquist’s purpose here is not yours and theology is a peripheral thing here.

  61. I believe the emendate domain should be use by Texas and shut this ranch down.

      1. Interesting article on “The Solar Retrograde Cycle and Little Ice Ages.”

        “Jupiter and Saturn are about to do something not seen since the year 1226”

        “The two largest planets in the solar system have fascinated astronomers for hundreds of years. But the gas giants will do something later this month not seen since the Middle Ages — they will look like a double planet.”

        “The rare occurrence will happen after sunset on Dec. 21, 2020, the start of the winter solstice.”

        “Alignments between these two planets are rather rare, occurring once every 20 years or so, but this conjunction is exceptionally rare because of how close the planets will appear to one another,” said Rice University astronomer Patrick Hartigan. “You’d have to go all the way back to just before dawn on March 4, 1226, to see a closer alignment between these objects visible in the night sky.”

        “So here we sit. The next beat of the 179-year solar retrograde cycle is due. The next beat of the 360-year Little Ice Age cycle is due. The next beat of the 1440-year ice-age cycle is due. The next beat of the 11,500-year ice-age cycle is due. The next beat of the 100,000-year ice-age cycle is due . . . and we’re worried about global warming?”

        “It’s ludicrous to be worried about global warming.”

  62. It makes perfect sense actually. You must abhor the idea of community. Hell is other people, right? Evil is truly caring about the stranger; being willing to sacrifice for the ‘other’. Of course an ideology like communism terrifies you when you can’t even feel comfortable as part of a community. And anyone who can must be a crackpot. You are an isolationist, pure and simple. What a lonely existence that must be!

    1. “Hell is other people,” is a line from Sartre, who was a communist sympathizer. Your ideology is a scam. In practice, it is tyranny.

      1. And a communist sympathizer is always a monster? This is exactly my point. Almost everyone is an enemy to you. Your personal vendetta drives everything about you. Grow up man.

      2. The communists in Beijing want to destroy our country. A communist sympathizer is helping this process of destruction whether he/she knows it or not. I have no vendetta. I just want America to be safe and free. If you sympathize with communism you are dangerously misguided. Look at every communist country on earth. All are despotic. People are crushed by such regimes. No real freedom. State control of every aspect of life. Enforced scarcity. As an adult in this world you should know about all this. You should be able to understand the differences between constitutional government and communist government.

      3. Doggone it, Jeff. You say, “I just want America to be safe and free.” We are neither. Oh sure, we have a modicum of freedom and safety depending on where we live. But the fact is the Communists are already here and have been for a long time. We are governed by Communists. The only reason we haven’t been invaded outright is because we are doing such a good job self-destructing. When the invasion, from other than South America and Islam, finally comes the only thing left for the invading army will be burial detail. You say, ” You should be able to understand the differences between constitutional government and communist government.” But you add that we cannot go backward – only forward. I’m a constitutionalist and a staunch American; and I am beside myself sitting on my butt waiting for TSTHTF. I understand the chaos that would result from an all out civil war. And, in all likelihood it would be a losing proposition anyway (my assessment only); but doing as we are now only guarantees that we are destined to extinction without ever having put up a fight. Don’t get me wrong, Jeff. I have a lot of respect for your opinions or I wouldn’t bother to argue with you.

      4. I do not understand why there should be an argument. The odds are heavily against us. Nobody understood the strategic situation in the past. Now we must explain it again and again until everyone sees that our insights match the unfolding reality. In fact, the enemy will shortly try and make us look like criminals. You watch what happens next. They are setting up Patriots for a fall. January 6 was nothing. Don’t get suckered into the wrong thing.

      5. Indeed. The only ”Socialism” that seems to work in this life is in the voluntary communities of faithful Christian monastics, prayerfully dedicated to the Lord with their whole lives (and a good number of them are solitary ascetics). And certainly no Atheist/Materialist could accomplish Socialism on an involuntary and societal level.

      6. I visited the Orthodox in the Scott Valley of Northern California to visit Bishop Chrysostomos of the Old Calendar Greek Orthodox Church. He was an amazing person. You could not believe the treasures of art they had built in their places of worship.

    2. Communism as community? Neighbors snitch on neighbors and children on their parents unto death. And that’s not just a Russian or Chinese thing. Read an article on Yale university with all your Marxist SJWs switching on fellow students and teachers to the point that the whole campus exists under a cloud of terror.

      It is what you call Conservatism that actually upholds natural law and its integral components of family and community. Imagining that we think “evil” is caring for another exposes your deep ignorance of how the vast majority of Americans live in this country.

      The hives of villainy and psychological isolation are in those big blue Democrat cities with the 700 murders a year (Chicago) run by Marxists in their little anti-social bubbles.

    3. Anonymous, what exactly are you trying to accomplish here? You seem like such an ass to me.

      Have you ever read William Bradford’s journal of the Pilgrims start in America? These were devout, God-fearing people. They tried “Communism”, in the most basic terms you described further up in the posts. It was a failure. It fostered lethargy in some, resentment in others. They abandoned it.

      If it cannot work among the most devout to live on this continent, with probably the strongest faith, and best work ethic, and most goodwill toward their neighbors, who were also engaged together in a serious struggle to survive, then it cannot and will not ever work. It goes against human nature-at least the better parts of human nature.

  63. It seems a theological debate broke out in the comments section. Whether Russian Orthodoxy is in line with the “early church” or not is quite irrelevant to the situation on the ground. While membership numbers are astronomical in Russia, attendance of once a month is only about 7% (at least as of 2008 per this Pew survey):

    This article from 2019 gives the figure of 6%, though the Patriarch Kirill boasts he is building huge numbers of churches:

    Meanwhile, Baptists, Pentecostals, and Christians of all types other than the Orthodox, face police raids, churches being demolished, and anti-evangelization laws that make it a crime to preach the Gospel.

    Kirill, by the way, is an old KGB agent. He spent decades promoting Liberation Theology, which isn’t Christian at all:

    The Russians play a double game where they put out much sound and fury attempting to woo right wingers with false information about Putin’s conservatism and the status of religion in Russia. Russian Orthodoxy is merely a church religion and serves internal and external propaganda/control purposes.

    1. It’s real simple; most people in Russia have a great antipathy for Western Christianity and always have, and even more so for American cults and their toxicity. I have no problem with having rules protecting one’s native culture and spirituality from such cults of Americanization. Whatever most Russian Orthodox might think of the ”official” Russian Orthodox church leadership,most are devout in a pious but very independent way, plus there other factors involved which I don’t think you’d understand or even want to understand. Let’s face it, chances are you’re a ”Jehovah’s Witness” or a Mormon or SDA person that hates Russia because your sect can’t find much of an opening there.

      Error has no rights, and the fact that in the West it does as a matter of principle,goes a long way towards why the West is circling down the toilet right now.

      1. “Let’s face it, chances are you’re a ”Jehovah’s Witness” or a Mormon or SDA person ”

        I am Presbyterian.

        “American cults”

        Russia’s ire is directed against all non-Russian orthodox religions, including communities that have been in Russia for generations, such as German Catholics, who have had churches demolished or outright stolen to be given to the Russian Orthodox. It’s persecution against Baptists and other groups are also not against “American” missionaries, but ethnic German and Russian converts. I believe there were some Baptists recently who got asylum in Germany due to police harassment. I don’t think the Baptist doctrine of sola fide is going to pervert the largely unbelieving Russians who don’t even attend Communion regularly despite claiming to be members of the Russian state church.

        Russia’s prosecution of Christians and the establishment of their own state religion is done for the very same reason why China does it: for purposes of mass control over the population. The “American” “toxicity” they are against is any possibility of opposition to Russian aggression and the rulers of Russia. Like the CCP, Russia has its “state” church, run by “former” KGB degenerates, who utilize the approved religion for political/propaganda/security ends, both at home and abroad. It is far easier for Russia to control religious people by funneling them into a church that is infiltrated and controlled by the government.

        As for “Independent” Russian Orthodox who don’t attend church, this is nonsense. There are no Eastern Orthodox who avoid communion, unless you’re claiming there are underground Priests taking care of the true faithful and are not popping up in these surveys. When Catholics or Orthodox fail to attend weekly communion, they are not actually Catholic or Orthodox.

        Since the above is nonsense, there are no secret “mostly devout” Russian Orthodox in Russia. They are a minority, and all claims to the opposite is pure nonsense.

      2. This is generally true, but the USA still has enough genuine Christians that they dominate the Republican party and make up a significant portion of the national electorate. Weekly attendance correlates quite highly with people actually following Christian teachings and even voting the way you’d expect a Christian to vote, such as the supermajority of such people voting for Trump in the primaries and also in the election.

        The USA is not Europe and definitely not Russia when it comes to the religious issue.

        That said, my intention wasn’t to have a “who is more religious” argument, but to push back at the false impressions made by the other poster about the status of Russian Orthodoxy in his country.

  64. “I am worried about a Marxist takeover of the country or a massive assault from overseas.” Thank you. Now I feel better. The two ended statement separated by “or” did it.

  65. Jeff, there is a post that showed up in my email that I can’t find for some reason. Whatever.

    I can understand your frustration on the comment area. I may be the only person commenting here that was a regular on your first board which you had to close c.a. 2000. Comment areas tend to absorb a lot of energy to keep them from getting away from your purpose. On the other hand, from what I have seen, those blogs that kill the comment area tend to lose a fair amount of readership, no matter what Ann Althouse may claim. I find it frustrating not to be able to comment when I think something needs to be added, or an error corrected, if such exists.

    The religious quarrels that break out are a residual of 2000 years of conflict in the Church, which became especially acute during the Reformation. Those battles were minimized during WW2 because the leadership clamped down hard on such things, but also because men realized such things were minor in comparison with what they were facing in the war.

    I understood why the original board was closed and agreed with the comments friends sent you advising you close the board. I also lost interest when it was closed.

    For me, you are pushing things I have already known for many years and I enjoy reading another take on it. I came at the matter from another angle, biblical prophecy. Nothing that is happening is a surprise to me.

    1. Back on the original board we were caught in 9/11, and it matched up with grey terror a bit; but they played that out for twenty years snd here we are. Actual biological warfare on a massive scale. This phase is looking like the real end game. I am seeing too many of the signs.

  66. Saintclare, you said somethings in which you really calumnate me,which need to be addressed;

    ”Mr Nyquist, why are you listening to this person, Vladimir?”

    It’s his website, and he’s intelligent and open minded.

    ”He is a liar, a deceiver. He is here to lead people astray. Some of his comments have been downright dangerous.”

    What have I lied about, or ”deceived” about? I give my honest opinions about what I believe, and what I know from personal experience. You can take it or leave it, but it is what it is. Have I personally attacked you? Not a good sign for indicating someone living in the truth.

    My God, I am literally almost 100 % in lockstep with Alexander Solzshenitsyn, Igor Sharefevich, Fyodor Dostyoevsky, with the Whites of the Russian Civil War and pretty much almost everybody in Russia prior to the 1917 Revolutions, especially in Anti-Communism, and bizarrely I’m treated as some freakish abomination by delirious western religious fanatics and conspiracy-addled political paranoids….

    ”You have honest people coming on here, searching for the truth.”

    You also have people who favor mystical apparitions and end-times theories who come here to shoe-horn Mr. Nyquist’s ideas into the framework of their hatreds of Russia, the Russian people, and Orthodox Christianity. Anti-Communism is just the fig leaf they use to disguise it, like the Nazis did.

    ”What Vladimir speaks about is false. I would like to bring your attention to the following Top Secret STB Policy c.j.
    CB-00 2040/0389, that was issued on 11-28-1989, that is AFTER the so called
    “collapse of communism” in Czechoslovakia, in one of its articles we can read
    the following:
    3) Top priority and essential tasks for our STB activities

    Section b) Operations:

    ….. through our influential network subdue attempts of the reactionary
    church officials to activate political clericalism that’s supportive of the
    right wing opposition movements and groups.
    It is my humble opinion, this is what Vladimir has been doing. Although there are no reactionary church officials here, his replies to certain people here, follow this policy.”

    What are you going on about? Can you point out what I have said that is false, and why you think that it is false?

    1. I am an admirer of Solzhenitsyn and other Russian anti communists. Many Westerners do not understand Eastern Orthodoxy. Great attention is paid to the early church fathers.

    2. I just spoke to a Brazilian friend, who has a lot of experience with this kind of thing; taht is, people fighting over theological differences. He said that the famous Brazilian conservative writer, Olavo de Carvalho, had this same problem on his websites. He would have Protestants and Catholics provoking fights with each other on his discussion boards. The ones provoking the fights, by the way, were pro-Putin (just to put things into context). I actually got peripherally involved in one of these disputes and I sided against a Protestant by taking Olavo’s side. I did so because this Protestant was clearly pro-Putin, and was spreading Russian state propaganda. This was very clear to me, as Olavo was calling out the communists. Why would an honest Protestant ever side with Putin? This is the dividing line here. And the whole game being played, in fact, was very interesting. If an anti-communist begins to get a larger audience, they break that audience up by inciting religious animosity between Christian groups. They suddenly turn a discussion about the communist threat into a discussion about the evils of Catholicism or Protestantism or Orthodoxy. An appeal is made to religious convictions. And this diverts people. Those who are most likely to oppose communism are those who are seriously religious. And those who are seriously religious are more likely to have particular views that conflict with other seriously religious persons. Do you see how this works? The communists have studied us. They know this about us. They are ready to break up our discussion by injecting such controversies into our deliberations. Any time we try to awaken people to the danger of communism, all the communists have to do is pose as a communicant in one of the three major branches of Christianity and start a food fight (so to speak). Pretty soon everyone forgets about communism because everyone is so angry that their theology is threatened by one of the other Christians. They are laughing at us. We are such fools and they are so clever! If a Catholic believes I am going to Hell, and thinks I am as great a threat to the true religion as a communist, how can I say anything? If an Orthodox Christian has this opinion of my faith, then why is he here? People can say what they will about me, but I know who the real enemy is here. It is the communists, the Marxists. We have to be able to tolerate each other and work together if we expect to physically survive. If we don’t, there will nothing left. And perhaps this will be God’s judgment on us all. My focus on communism is constantly being undermined by religious quarrels. It makes us all look ridiculous. There are no pure Catholic or Orthodox or Protestant countries left in the world. I am sorry. If you expect to defeat the communists, you are not going to win by turning away allies; especially genuine Russian and Chinese Christians. In the political sphere, we live under a secular constitution because there would be a bloody religious war if we didn’t. The kind of vitriol I have seen in this discussion site, in which people attack other forms of Christianity, is an insult to me. I take personal offense at it. I have invited everyone here to have a discussion about communism — not to see you beating each other over the head for not believing in the true gospel. So I don’t want to see religious commentary here. This site is about Marxism, and communism, and the strategy that is now unfolding. If you go off reciting prophecies or scriptures, or Bible versus or interpretations, you are opening a religious discussion, you are opening yourself to a discussion of theology that will divide us. I will no longer have it. Religious differences are being used to disrupt this site. It is painfully obvious. This site does not exist for religious debate. It exists so we can track the advance of Marxism, so we can understand what is happening to America and the world. Statements of faith are personal. If you want to attack another Christian denomination, set up your own site. GET OFF MINE.

  67. Jeff, not sure if you can comment, David DuByne who has a youtube channel uploaded a video talking about crop losses in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere, he also talks about the crop losses and food price increase in China:

    1. The world is facing serious food problems. I think the grand solar minimum is part of if. China and Russia new this was coming.

Comments are now closed.