Get prepared for actual combat….
Xi Jinping
Below these notes is my June 6 interview with Seth Holehouse. A little editing is in order. Viewers should note two verbal slips in this interview: (1) I referred to Deng Xiaoping instead of Xi Jinping at one point, (2) When I said, “most of the people in the communist movement are communists” I was trying to say, “most of the people in the communist movement aren’t communists.” I prefer the written word because you can catch mistakes of this kind; but when you speak off the top of your head, trying to think of simple ways to explain complicated things, your brain can skip a step.
As for the substance of the interview, a key takeaway is: The Alliance between Russia and China must not be swept under the rug. What is frustrating, of course, is that pundits and statesmen regularly overlook this alliance or outright deny it. On what basis are these countries allied? As Russian historian Marina Kalashnikova said to me thirteen years ago, Russia and China are allied “because they are both [ruled by] communists.” She explained what she meant in detail on my youtube account, when I interviewed her (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTpe84lGMnY).
Marina said, “When Yeltsin was in power … Russian foreign policy was practically free from paranoid approaches…. But with Putin in power … we reinstalled this paranoid approach.” I mentioned to Marina that Russia was still supporting communist countries around the world and still working with China. I asked if Russia was doing this simply to overcome the United States, or whether this was a “residual thing from the Cold War” in which “they did not want to give up their old concepts” (i.e., Marxism). Marina said the answer was “both.” She explained, “They restart relationships with all allies from the Cold War … and a special stake is made on China as their ally. In the discussion, who could be their most beneficial ally, the United States or China, China of course has gotten the prize. China has won.” As the Russians were then giving military technology to China, I asked if the Russians were afraid that technology would be turned against Moscow. “They are not afraid of that,” said Marina. “Russia believes they will be reliable friends.” Is it because Russia “has the energy resources China needs?” Marina then surprised me by saying, “I would say that ideological motivation is much stronger. So, I guess that communist principles and ideas bring them together much closer than the energy supply factor because in the Chinese economy oil supplies are not so important.” She then added that in Russia, ideology prevails over the economic factor in building relations with China “because Russian behavior is sometimes very illogical. It looks that way from the Western standpoint.” She added that it is very difficult for Western foreign policy planners because – not realizing communist ideology is driving policy – they expect Russia to do one thing, and Russia does the opposite because of “their communist ideology.”
This open admission that the Russian Federation is under communist control is highly significant. It is also worth noting that Marina was at this time (2010) poisoned with mercury (probably laced with a radioactive element). Less than three years after this conversation she died of cancer in a Moscow hospital. She was a well-placed observer in Moscow, who personally knew top people in the Soviet and Russian governments. She was not an ignorant nobody, but someone who could speak with authority, who was working with her husband on a history of the Soviet Union. She explained, “The American audience and officials should know that in Russia ideology always prevails.” I then asked, “So there is a common cause with the Chinese and that’s why they support Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega and the ANC in South Africa and so on?”
Her reply was that the geopolitical factor is certainly part of it, but, “The factor of communist partner[ing] and ideology is the basic one.” Marina also touched on the deeply militaristic nature of the Russian system under Putin. Communism was, by nature, a militaristic system, predicated on world revolutionary warfare. But Russian militarism goes even deeper than that, as Marina explained:
Jeff, Russian militarism is an historical part of society, very cruel for us and aggressive going back to the Tsarist regime when [the] Russian military is part of … the intelligentsia of society. The Soviet history of the Civil War made this part of society. The military industrial complex is a cruel thing – cruel both for all potential enemies outside the country and for the people….
Marina then recalled when she had discussions with “military technique designers.” They could extend their budget to any size, she explained. During the period of Soviet restoration (without the restoration of the Soviet name), these people have “huge power” within the Russian system. She said they had “unrestricted, unbridled ambitions.” And, she said, they preserve their secrets with great cruelty.
Therefore, in recent weeks, as China tries to publicly walk back its partnership with Russia by framing it as a mere friendship, we must not be fooled. Once you understand that these two powers are together, and have always been together, you will be better equipped to see what is coming. And very few have been ahead of the game in this respect. Too many people have accepted the Russian lies, seeing Ukraine as some kind of Western proxy, which it is not. They see Ukraine as a symbol of homosexualism or transgenderism, which it is not. Ukraine is more conservative, in general, than the West. But who understands this?
Last week a caller on a talk show reproached me for opposing Putin’s “righteous war” against the abomination of homosexuality. Another said I was obviously a George Soros supporter. It has not occurred to them that the moral irritants in their immediate environment are irrelevant to questions of war and peace. Here one must have a sense of proportion, which is lacking in many people. Communism is what the leaders in Russia and in Beijing are fighting for – according to Marina Kalashnikova, according to Anatoliy Golitsyn, etc. However subverted the West may be, Russia would not be needing to attack Ukraine if the West was fully under the control of their “friends.”
Regarding the Ukraine War, a note on terminology is in order: the Ukrainian offensive, which has been erroneously referred to as a counteroffensive, supposedly started earlier this month. This offensive appears now to be on hold (since the breaking down of a major dam on the Dnipro River). A counteroffensive, in military terms, is an attack launched directly into an enemy who is actively on the offensive. Since Russia’s offensives have long since petered out, and there is no ongoing Russian offensive, the Ukrainians are initiating an offensive of their own. This means the Ukrainians have the initiative. In other words, the Russians are losing the war.
Ukraine has not released any details about its offensive moves. Most of what we have are unreliable Russian reports. Everything that happens from this point forward depends on the outcome of the Ukraine War.
Here is my 6 June interview with Seth:
Quarterly Subscription (to support the site)
JRNyquist.blog
$15.00
160 responses to “China’s 2023 Plans: An Interview with Man in America”
Mr Nyquist what would convergence look like at a street level (microscopic level)in a western country..in the workplace… stores etc
You can see it even now, when the Proud Boys are linking arms with Black Lives Matter, when the far left and the far right are working closely together to squeeze out the middle.
Finally, someone with notoriety outs the Proud Boys.
They are neither Christian nor conservative. They were agent provocateurs in partnership with Antifa, from the start. In Portland, Oregon, they would meet to rumble in a one block square that’s Federal property, so that the Mayors, of different terms, could each cite no jurisdiction to stop them.
Conservatives don’t riot in the streets like useful idiots.
Nobody ever talks about what the proud in Proud Boys, means.
This is Pride Month.
Why aren’t they front and center?
Shaw supporting refugees from Iran, owned the Persian House Restaurant in Portland, which was looted by Antifa during George Floyd rioting.
https://theimmigrantstory.org/i-was-a-child-of-revolution/
I used to send money on GoFundMe to Proud Boys members who were injured in fights with Antifa members. I started feeling a little suspicious of them after awhile, especially of their leader, and quit keeping up with them. I had no idea they had linked arms with BLM. That answers the mistrust I had begun to feel.
I was also really disappointed when I read on their website, and learned they were for legalizing drugs. I don’t know if that’s exactly how it was worded, but that was the gist of it.
Think this might be part of why the Administration is “kissing up” to China?
“Raytheon CEO Explains Why China Has US Military By The Balls”
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/raytheon-ceo-china-has-us-military-balls
The Chinese are now unequivocally telling the U.S. that it’s either cooperation or conflict. Golitsyn predicted this scenario as “cooperation-blackmail” many decades ago.
https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2023/06/19/blinken-to-meet-xi-as-china-warns-u-s-must-choose-between-cooperation-or-conflict-with-beijing/
Convergence on communist terms.
The body language between the two (in that picture) speaks volumes!
Our Secretary of State looks like he is uncomfortable — perhaps a bowel problem.
You are right. The body language of the two is devastating. 51 years ago, on the last day of his fatal February 1972 visit to China, Pres. Nixon made the involuntarily ominous remark, “We have been here a week. This was the week that changed the world.” And that’s what that “change” has turned out to be: An American Secretary of State standing beside a Chinese-communist strongman like a fearful subordinate, with his tail between his legs and almost as if he wasn’t there. All that China Joe’s so-called Administration is administering is surrender by instalments. It’s heartbreaking to watch.
Here’s the direct link to that photograph:
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2023/06/GettyImages-1258808918.jpg
Blinken has always looked very effeminate and soft to me. I’ve never sensed any kind of manliness in any photo I’ve seen of him.
That goes for Kirby, Kerry, and (of course) Buttigeig as well. And the Surgeon General. Zero manliness exuded. Not one iota.
Also General Milley.
From Webster’s dictionary:
Subservient:
1 : useful in an inferior capacity
2 : serving to promote some end
3 : obsequiously submissive
I’d say that pretty much covers it.
Also, in Chinese — Kowtowing. PS – It is not about towing cows.
Hi Jeff,
I have finally read your blog before the comments closed. First off my condolences on your father’s passing.
I’ve been reading your blog on and off since Mike Adams had you on his show. I have left Ukraine when it was part of the FSU as a young child and simply didn’t know what to make of this war. All the Alt media I read was pro Russia ,yet My mom has insisted that Russia is still imperialistic and wants to take control of the world. I started refusing to discuss the war or read about it. I skipped blog posts that had Russia somewhere in the first paragraph or two. I have finally buckled up and started reading, your insight has brought so much clarity, seemingly random pieces of information started fitting together and making sense. So much so ,that I’ve bought your two books available her on Amazon.ca for my husband to read. I sincerely thank you for your work. My question is this: I have teenagers, when asked wether they know what communism is, they just stared at me. What would be a good introduction to the whole topic for them to read? Something that won’t sway them the wrong way.
Whittaker Chamber’s book, “Witness.” Depending on the age of your children, and their reading ability. There is also Benjamin Gitlow’s book, “For the Whole of Their Lives.” Very powerful expecially about John Reed.
Thank you
Sad that independent journalists like a Leo Hohmann suddenly argue today that his source, Scott McGregor is his one and only trusted source for what’s going on with the Russian Ukraine conflict today. Add to it that when little ol’ me challenges him on his sources and give him sources of defector literature of years ago, detailing the long range strategy and personal comments on what is happening with the spread of Communism? It’s simply discredited, blown off, and one gets immediately chastised and censored from posting on his site…this from a so-called political right “conservative Christian”? With folks like this reporting? At least we know who the enemy is with the Left, as well as the propaganda and message….these guys are being played.
Yes, it is sad that a neglected truth or facts are treated so shamefully.
I’ve again attempted to point him (Leo Hohmann) to defector literature in their own words, including Golitsyn’s book “New Lies for Old”. And again been accused of insulting other fans on his blog and he’s given me a warning I’ll be banned from his site…he says he’s heard you before and you are not credible and it is all propaganda other than the words of Douglas MacGregor.
I’m joining you in the Alamo, Jeff!
🙃
We’re all in the Alamo together. They’re coming for us either way. Might as well go down resisting, right?
That should be our resolve.
Yessir
After reading The Perestroika Deception another time, I saw that Golitsyn talks about 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre (p107). It’s not clear at all what happened in this square before the massacre and why were protests organized. Do you have any information on this ?
I am counting on you to keep leading the way in the fight against communism even though the likely outcome is weighed against us. It seems impossible that America could fall to the wiles of communism, but that seems to be happening. You are so correct that many Americans who support communism are not communists. Seems mass psychosis is ramping up and those who have studied history know how that turns out.
It is a very desperate situation, though most people have no clue.
What interest does Moscow have with the Far East? Other than Alaska (I saw a photo of a billboard in Russia saying “Alaska is ours”) and parts of Canada, haven’t Moscow and Beijing already divvied up the spoils that China would get the lower 48, and the Pacific isles? A few months ago I read a report that Moscow is stripping even far eastern Siberia of its soldiers and weaponry to send them to Belarus—I just don’t see Moscow waiting for a resolution of the Ukrainian war to pivot to the Far East, rather that they will use tactical nukes to lead their armies westward from Ukraine.
This invasion of Ukraine has been a PR disaster for Russia. Throughout the West governments are talking about ramping up weapons’ production. But factories take time to tool up and begin production. If Moscow waits until a complete subjugation of Ukraine, can their armies face new weapons coming out of western factories? Or will they make a massive attack now from Belarus through western Ukraine, then westward through Slovakia, Czech Republic then into Germany before the West has a chance to rearm? How many troops has Russia sent into Belarus? What about troops in western Russia facing Finland and the Baltic States? Or is this a quiet build up that nobody is watching?
I freely admit that my analysis may be wrong, that the real war will be next year instead of this. But knowing how little the West is presently prepared, how much of what little we had has been sent to Ukraine to be eaten up in battle, and that how western governments are slowly waking up to the danger in which they find themselves, I just don’t see how waiting another year would benefit Russia. I’ve been wrong before, but my analysis of the situation favors an attack this year rather than waiting a year.
World war, initiated by Russia and China, can start at any time. The main target would be the destruction of America and NATO, Japan and South Korea. No other countries could remain independent if these were defeated. The U.S. nuclear umbrella is the largest deterrent and must be dealt with if China and Russia expect to win. Mr. Wang from Luda Media says that there are Russian troops hidden in Siberia — the best part of the Russian Army — ready to strike against Japan and Alaska. The Russian military in Ukraine does indeed appear to be undersized for the force structures they reportedly had before the invasion. People are quick to write off the Russian military, and it has performed badly in Ukraine. But if Mr. Wang is correct, the danger remains. If the Russians have stripped Siberia of troops, then they cannot wage war in the Pacific until the Ukraine fight is over. Soviet military theory says that nuclear strikes must be followed up with troops who take possession of the attacked territory. You cannot allow the attacked territory time to organize and recover.
IMO they will make deal with Poland, give them parts of Ukraine and control over central Europe and Baltics. Poland is arming like crazy recently, they have bigger military than Germany. For what? Read about three seas project.
As always, communism is going after our farmers and dedicated to whittling away at private property rights and destroying food supply capacities. Support your local farmers.
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/surveyors-trespass-private-property-begin-digging-destroying-crops
https://youtu.be/pqHQN54XCL0
https://www.wisfarmer.com/story/news/2023/06/21/wastewater-violation-at-creamery-strands-milk-from-45-wi-mn-farms/70335476007/
They are using every available avenue of attack to destroy us.
Monopolists like Gates and Rockefellers go after (not only) your farmers. For some reason JR Nyquist is defending them.
If I stood up for free speech you’d accuse me of defending Nazis. If I stand up for private property, then I am the shill of billionaires. If I stand up for the Ukrainian people, then I am a Pentagon flunky. If I deplore the Holocaust then I am a Zionist tool. Yet you are a communist — in favor of the most bloodthirsty, monstrous tyranny in history. And we dare not breathe a word of the scandal, or suffer censorship.
I’m sorry, last time i wrote here i was drunk, I apologize for that.
I mentioned the name Barry Long, I beleive I added a link to his website.
I would really encourage you to read him more thouroghly, In “Only fear dies” he talks about the “final news” – nukes are flying. He is the real deal, don’t confuse him with the charlatans.
He is extremely undervalued. IMO.