In 1960, a secret directive was issued by the KGB in Moscow to the intelligence service’s representatives abroad and the security service at home on the influencing of foreign visitors to the Soviet Union, especially politicians and scholars; efforts were made to use, recruit, and discredit anticommunist politicians, journalists, scholars, and analysts of communist affairs during their visits to communist countries.

Anatoliy Golitsyn

The common element in all of this is the degeneration of language into an instrument of rape. It does contain violence, albeit in latent form. And precisely this is one of the lessons recognized by Plato through his own experience with the sophists of his time, a lesson he sets before us as well. This lesson, in a nutshell, says: the abuse of political power is fundamentally connected with the sophistic abuse of the word, indeed, finds in it the fertile soil in which to hide and grow and get ready, so much so that the latent potential of the totalitarian poison can be ascertained, as it were, by observing the symptom of the public abuse of language. The degradation, too, of man through man … by all tyrannies, has its beginnings … when the word loses its dignity.

Joseph Pieper

In this age of “technicity,” “sociology,” and “economics,” many people do not take ideas seriously. Instead of ideas, they have catchwords. Everything is resolved into one catchword; and that catchword is “science.” The Marxists and their fellow travelers have claimed “science” as their very own; that is, they claim the social sciences, climate science, and medical science (regarding viruses, vaccines, lock-downs, etc.).

As this catchphrase of “science” is paraded before us, we are told that “ideology” is dead. The Marxists have promoted this slogan themselves, and the non-Marxist world has believed them. Somehow, man can exist without ideas because he has “science.” In truth, however, ideas are behind everything. The economy is driven by ideas, religion depends on “ideas.” Even the world of fashion is nothing more than an ever-shifting mall of ideas. Politics is nothing without ideas, and the same can be said about “science.”

Everyone is so dependent on ideas, that they are constantly reciting and repeating ideas, over and over again – as if to hypnotize themselves with ideas. Every time we call America a “democracy,” we are asserting an idea of how our system works, or how it is supposed to work. Of course, this idea, like so many others, is a myth. Every issue in America is not decided by voting. Voting usually takes place every two years for the House of Representatives, every four years for President and Vice President, every six years for each U.S. Senate seat. You may think it a scandal, but America was not conceived by the Founding Fathers as a “democracy,” but as a mixed system which combined the simple forms of the state into separate powers balanced each against the other. This, again, is an idea which originated in ancient Greece (with the Spartans). It was the idea on which the Roman Republic was based. Democracy is only part of our system. It has also been pointed out, especially by Robert Michels in a book titled Political Parties, that democracy is just another way of organizing oligarchy. By discrediting and replacing all our ideas with their “science,” the Marxists hope to become the ruling oligarchy of America and the world.

Ideas matter very much. And even if we do not know it, we have all been programmed by the ideas that constantly circulate in society and inside our heads. If we ask what the ruling ideas of our time might be, we can immediately turn to a group of ideas that all go together: global warming, feminism, Critical Race Theory, LGBTQ liberation, “take the jab,” open borders, socialism, etc. These are the emerging, ruling ideas of our time – in North America and Europe. And every one of these ideas has been pushed forward by the “communist movement.” These ideas have been pushed by the various communist parties and communist front groups in the West; by Marxist professors, activists, writers, etc.

The “communist movement” is a movement which largely consists of non-communists. Why, then, do we call it “communist”? Because the fuel, the ideas – especially the weaponized ideas – of that movement come from the communists. This is what most non-communists do not understand about the “communist movement.” This movement is not strictly made up of communists. All the ideas of the movement are not directly found in the writings of Marx and Lenin. As it happens, the weaponized ideas of the movement are always changing. If you understand the strategy of revolutionary conquest and cultural subversion that the communists are following, you will begin to understand how ideas drive the process of world revolution forward.

To explain how all this works, I contacted an expert on the communist movement. He is known as “Jimmy from Brooklyn” because that is the name he is known by on various conservative talk radio shows. For many years Jimmy has been attempting to educate our well-foddered, famous talk radio hosts on the fake collapse of the Soviet Union and the ongoing rise of communism.

Interview With Jimmy

JRN: Jimmy from Brooklyn, it is so good to talk with you.

JIMMY: It’s very good to be talking to you again and, hopefully, I can help educate your audience.

JRN: Almost twenty years ago I was listening to Michael Savage’s radio show, and you came on, and you started talking about communism, and about how the fall of the Soviet Union was not as advertised. I was riveted because I had written a book on this subject a few years before, and I was having trouble getting people to believe me, and there you were, on the radio, spelling it all out. I could not believe what I was hearing.

JIMMY: Let me say that when I first heard about you, and people showed me what you were writing, I was pleasantly surprised. I thought you were listening to me and copying me! It turned out that we both had the same opinion and knowledge, even though we were so far apart from each other.

JRN: But you learned this from different sources than the ones I used.

JIMMY: Yeah, I was self-taught. Basically, I first got interested in communism by being around certain people. I knew folks who grew up under communism, or their parents had lived under communism. I had an instinct about communism; then I started to go to anti-war rallies, started seeing communism [in action], and was hearing what they were saying. But I was always interested in it, even as a little kid. So, I started studying it more than half a century ago; and I have been inside the movement, and I have been talking on the radio for 34 years. I mostly learned from reading about the communist movement, the American communist party and Soviet literature. In the Soviet literature they do a lot of writing about their “other” collapses. Sun Tzu had [suggested] the weak look – you know – “when strong appear weak, when weak appear strong.” The Soviets were like Sun Tzu on steroids. They don’t just appear weak. They collapse!

JRN: Let’s talk about some of those past collapses, during the early days of the Soviet Union, after the Russian Civil War. Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy (NEP) in which he retreated into “state capitalism.” They also created a false opposition movement called The Trust. Would you say that was the first fake collapse of communism?

JIMMY: Yeah. They faked that they were getting weak. They were luring in American businessmen to invest money and technology and know-how. So, they lured in people, and they brought in a person who was working for the communists, a guy named Armand Hammer. He made some money and lured in more businessmen. That was going on; and what helped that succeed was an organization called “The Trust.” The Soviets were faking collapse. They had jailbreaks. They built the illusion that there was a strong opposition in Russia fighting against the communists; and they were so convincing the Americans, French, Germans – all these countries – saw evidence that there was an imminent collapse; so, they lured in top people from the Western world’s intelligence agencies and, at some point, the Soviets rounded them up and “liquidated” them.

JRN: And the Soviets got diplomatic recognition from many countries because of the NEP.

JIMMY: Yes. They won on so many levels; but the interesting thing, Soviet publications from the period 1984 to 1990 were stressing the New Economic Policy and how that helped Lenin and the Soviet Revolution succeed. They didn’t mention the Trust, except in Sputnik Magazine. The communists spread their message, first to the communist leadership and in their publications. While U.S. intelligence is tapping phones and trying to plant agents, the Soviet publications were passing major information directly to the leadership of the communist-controlled parties worldwide.

JRN: So our intelligence didn’t do their homework, did not read those communist publications.

JIMMY: In World Marxist Review – a communist publication – they admitted that there were 90 different communist parties above ground. They also have illicit parties below ground. They also have front groups. The only country among those 90 that prints, publishes and distributes materials to all the other parties was the Soviets.

JRN: The Soviet Union was at the center of it.

JIMMY: Yes, obviously; but it is a world Marxist movement. The title of this publication, again, is World Marxist Review. It is published in the Soviet Union, in every language, and sent around the world. When you read that publication, especially between 1984 and 1990, you will find that they kept stressing the New Economic Policy [of Lenin]. They also praised Gorbachev for “taking away the image of the enemy.”

JRN: And that is exactly what they did.

JIMMY: After the Soviet Union collapsed … they took away that image. In Gorbachev’s writing he says that taking away the image of the enemy, and changing how Russia operates, will strengthen the socialist forces in the capitalist countries, because this is a world movement and they work in every country. The best way to help the communist movement in every country – particularly as America was always the main enemy – is to take away the image of the Soviet threat, and make the movement look like homegrown socialism in each country. Then you can advance with less murder and violence, and it doesn’t seem like a worldwide communist conspiracy. Then they can more easily achieve what they set out to do. 

JRN: So, the local communists had a role to play.

JIMMY: In fact, the American Communist Party [CPUSA], in the early 1990s had a fake split. They do fake collapses and they do fake splits. The breakaway faction called themselves The Committees of Correspondence. The breakaway faction was led by people like Angela Davis. She was very close to Fidel Castro. She was a hardline communist, and Carl Bloice was the Communist Party’s Moscow correspondent for the [American] party’s paper. Many other serious leaders in the Communist Party joined this breakaway faction. Then they joined together with the Rainbow Coalition, the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, and they brought together what seemed to me (at the time) obscure Marxist parties. Then they got in with and joined the Democratic Socialists of America.

This is how it worked: The Communist Party split with [their] Soviet connected leaders. They bring together various splinter groups and obscure communist groups. They link up with the Democratic Socialists, and they use it all to get control over the Democratic Party. So again, this is the Soviet hand working in America. It’s like the proxy of a proxy of a proxy. It is absolutely brilliant.

JRN: It is like a shell game used to slip their players into the Democratic Party.

JIMMY: Right, and they made America the enemy. So, somehow they’re the “blue” and we are the “red.” Those are the colors by which we have been designated by the media. We are the red, but we are also the fascists and racists. So, if you’re a Democratic Party loyalist – not a communist – but a normal, good, American who doesn’t know what is going on, you’re fooled by all this. The Republicans are the red, and then you start hearing that Trump colluded with Russia. So, you would keep voting for the Democrat Party to save our country. Through all of this deception and manipulation the communists are winning. And, coincidentally, it is following exactly the book, And Not a Shot Is Fired. The book was written by Jan Kozak. He was an historian writing for the Czechoslovak Communist Party.

In 1948, in Czechoslovakia, the communists took over relatively easily. They got control of the enforcement parts of the government. They built massive popular front groups at the bottom [of society]. These put pressure on the government. They slowly squeezed and squeezed and squeezed until they squeezed out the moderates and the free-market democrat people. So, Czechoslovakia became a full-fledged communist dictatorship; and the model for that is outlined in the book, which was written by the communists as a “how to” book – And Not a Shot Is Fired.

In World Marxist Review, several times through the decades, they explained that Czechoslovakia 1948 is the model. So, in terms of today: the Marxists enter the Democratic Party, weaponizing the government and media to go after the opposition. Hence, what do you see? The President is censored [President Trump], is derided, is attacked as being an enemy agent colluding with Russia; meanwhile this whole thing attacking Trump was built by Soviet Russia. It is absolutely brilliant.

I have said in the past on the radio, that if I lived on another planet, and looked down at earth like it was an ant farm, I would be able to marvel at the brilliance of the communists. But these are bad people. They are on the verge of victory, because when they win elections and get power, they are going to change the laws, the rules, the Constitution, to make their victories permanent. For example, they want to make Puerto Rico a state, and also Washington, D.C. I also heard they want to make Guam and the Virgin Islands into states. If they do that, they will have a permanent majority in the U.S. Senate. This gives the Democratic Party a monopoly. But it is not the real Democratic Party. It is all part of the Communist Movement now.

I do not say that every Democrat in office understands this. Most people just go with the flow. They have no idea of the treachery and the diabolical operations behind it. Now you and I studied this, we understand it. Sometimes it’s a little hard to explain; but, at some point a critical mass [of information] … [allows] you to put the pieces together. The work I’m doing, you’re doing – Trevor Loudon, Cliff Kincaid and Diana West – exposes all this. If people read these things, listened to the shows we do, the interviews we do, hopefully we could have a mass awakening; because if we don’t, we are really in serious trouble; and I think now, we are really in serious trouble. 

JRN: We are in deep trouble.

JIMMY: I said this to Giuliani on the radio, and he says I paint a dire picture. The threat to America, which was all built by Soviet intelligence over the decades, and by Red China, is a world communist movement. They are tightly organized, well-coordinated; all of their stuff is well-thought-out.

Take a look at Frances Fox Piven. She and her husband put out the idea of collapsing the system by overloading the welfare state. There are books by her, speeches, events, and so on. A lot of what she and her husband were saying about collapsing the system could have been developed in the Soviet Union. In order to show the world that these things were not of Soviet origin, the Soviets would frequently give intellectuals in the West things to write about. Frances Fox Piven did a lot of damage to us. She has been very influential in the communist movement. She was also connected to the Soviets. She was a senior fellow at the tax-exempt KGB front group, the Institute for Policy Studies – which shapes and influences government policies. She also works at a group connected to the Brecht Forum. All of these people are interconnected. Everything is interconnected.

JRN: Going back to something you said earlier about the World Marxist Review being published in the Soviet Union, people are probably rolling their eyes and saying, “Oh Jimmy, there is no more Soviet Union.” But Progress Publishers in Moscow is still publishing communist books. And they are publishing these books in partnership with American communists long after the fall of the Soviet Union; and they are shipping these books to America. How do we account for this continued pro-communist subversive activity out of Moscow – out of a state-run Russian publishing house?

JIMMY: What you just said – that’s the perfect example of why they do the collapses. In fact, collapses are the weak look. More than that, it is the disappeared look. It allows these conservatives to boast about winning the Cold War, that we defeated communism. But they did not really win. Whenever the communists do a collapse, they gain strength from it. They collapsed the COMINTERN in May, 1943; but they continued to work in other ways. When Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua lost the election many years ago, he said “We are going to rule from below.” And now who is in charge of Nicaragua? The country is now communist.

JRN: True.

JIMMY: The communists work above-ground, they work below ground. Like I said, it is brilliant. Now, they also publish things about neutralizing the opposition. So, in World Marxist Review they said they have to study the strong and weak points of anti-communism. They study us in order to defeat us and outsmart us. So, the Marxist movement is tailored specifically to every country, with an eye to the history of every target country.

In America they focus on our history of slavery, the Civil War, and Jim Crow. They have everything narrowed down to specific groups within each country. In order to lead the people, they say, you have to be of the people. So, they train blacks to lead blacks, they train gay leaders to lead the gay movement, they train women to lead the women’s movement. It’s brilliant. To lead the people, you have to be of the people. Simultaneously they try to help with people’s most immediate needs. So, the Soviet think tanks, the Soviet Academy of Sciences, especially the Institute for USA and Canada … study us. They know our history. They know our Constitution. They know these things better than many of us do. They learn our Constitution in order to twist it and defeat it. Absolutely brilliant.

It used to be, years ago, that black civil rights leaders were actually trained in the Soviet Union – until the last couple of decades. They do not need to train in the Soviet Union. Now they can train at Harvard, Yale, and all our schools. Here is how it works: Agents built the cadre, the cadre built the vanguard, the vanguard built the mass movement. The communists brag that they have changed mass thought patterns. They have changed the thinking patterns of millions of people in the West. It’s brilliant.

In Islam, for example, they changed the psychological makeup of Muslims. You can read about this in their publications. They put out one publication, the Soviets did, about working in Central Asia. So, what they do is, they go to work in every country in Central Asia. They teach those people their history, and even their language, and they also teach them Russian because Russian is the language that binds it all together. So, they describe it as “national in form, socialist in content.” It’s brilliant. So if you apply that to America, they teach the blacks about their history, so it is “national in form,” that is, as black nationalism versus racism, and it is “socialist in content.” So, they teach the blacks the worst part of their history in this country, but they mix in the idea that socialism is the solution to racism. And they use this same template with women, gays, youth, Hispanics. And then they have a big one that unites all the different people, and that is the environmental movement, the Green Movement. They have to destroy America’s energy sector to “save the planet.” It’s brilliant.

In the old days, war was strictly a military thing. You bomb the factories. You knock out the energy sector. You bomb the oil refineries. Well, they are destroying our energy sector; but not by bombing. They destroy our factories, but not by bombing. They destroy those factories by moving them overseas – to China. It’s brilliant.

JRN: They make so many environmental regulations that our factories become unprofitable unless we move them overseas.

JIMMY: We send our jobs overseas. That creates poverty here. Another thing – unions. The communists write, in their own publications, that unions are a training ground for communism. They also write that “unions are how we wage war against capitalism.”

In the 1930s, in communist publications, they told the workers in the factories to report to their union leaders on what they were making. They wanted information on defense work to pass to the Soviet Union. The Marxist organizers also told dockworkers and longshoreman to report on shipping information. There was also a lot of sabotage against our factories – just before the war, when Stalin was supporting Hitler. Then, when the Soviet Union was invaded by Hitler, the unions put out orders: No more strikes, no more work stoppages, no more sabotage – because the Soviets needed war supplies from America to defeat Hitler.

The same communist publications say, that in a socialist America unions become an instrument of control and implementation of the socialist way of life. So how did these unions get this influence over the workers? Easy. They helped them get better wages and better work conditions. At the same time the unions are working to destroy the businesses by pushing prices up or union rules that cause production problems. This forces the factories, then, to move overseas. Where? To China.

JRN: I was going to ask you, Jimmy, about the longshoreman on the West Coast, who are engaged in a work slowdown. This is clogging all the ports on the West Coast. There are forty ships backed up in every berth. This is causing serious supply chain problems throughout the United States. Isn’t it true that the longshoreman’s union, on the West Coast, is a communist union?

JIMMY: It has always been. Harry Bridges was the leader. Usually, when the communists control something, they don’t lose it. But the West Coast was known as being under their union. Let me get to religions for a second.

JRN: Okay.

JIMMY: The Christian religions here, the Catholic and Christian churches, have been infiltrated. There was a Catholic priest in Nicaragua who worked with the Sandinista communists. This Catholic priest told the Sandinista troops “there is no God and there is no Jesus Christ. You are God and Christ is the Revolution.”

Also, the communists write in various publications that to be a good Christian you must also be a good Marxist. Here is the best one: “Christians in the capitalist countries must work to undermine their vast economic and political apparatus.” So, it used to be that communists were against all religion; but instead of fighting religion – which caused a backlash – they said, “Why fight it? Get in it! Get control of it!” So, you could get good, decent, hard-working family people from throughout the world and you can go to their churches and they are being preached to, and indoctrinated by people who are telling them about the goodness of Marxism.

One thing all these “religious” Marxists do, is teach against America – that America is the enemy. In the KGB they said that America is “enemy number one.” Well, the Muslim radicals, trained by the Soviets, were taught that America is “the big Satan.” So, no matter how they work, it is all about creating a unified force against America. All Soviet publications stressed that colonialism and imperialism in Asia, Africa and Latin America is coming from the United States. Meanwhile, in America, they organize everyone by race and sex – and even by sixty genders! Anybody that opposes it is racist, homophobic or transphobic. It’s brilliant.

JRN: It is interesting, Jimmy, that a lot left wing people who react to my site, or to my writings, accuse me of being “afraid of communism” or “afraid of homosexuals.” It is always about me being “phobic.” I could never quite understand this, because what you are talking about is absolutely factual. It is not about fear of these groups. It is the realization that communism is dangerous to the happiness and good order of society; it is the enemy of liberty, of patriotism, and our religious traditions. And everyone is either intimidated or goes along with false leftist narratives. This is a remarkable swindle.

JIMMY: It is a total swindle. And some of these people will say that you are crazy because it is the easiest argument to make. When people tell me I’m crazy I don’t argue with them. I say, “Maybe I’m crazy, but I’m right.” And I have the documents to prove it. But they do not want to see your documents. They just want to censor you with ridicule. It’s brilliant.

JRN: People do not understand that communism is more than a conspiracy. It is a religion, a world movement, based on ideas that must be spread to every corner of the Earth.

JIMMY: This needs to be explained. It is the duty of communists to help other communists all over the world. They are internationalists. Communism/Marxism cannot be defeated because it is the natural course of history.

JRN: That is what the Marxists say. That is their “science.”

JIMMY: Right. And you cannot argue with it because it is a “science.” So if we argue against this idea of global warming, we are questioning science. That makes them crazy. Also, global warming unites all the different economic, racial, ethnic groups because they teach everyone to “save the planet” and stop pollution. Then, of course, America is the big polluter. So, we are racist, we are colonialist, we are fascist and we are the polluters. And they neutralize the conservative side.

For that last thirty years the most important – extremely important – part of the communist movement is the American media’s conservative celebrities. “WHAT DO YOU MEAN, JIMMY?” People ask. Well, for thirty years it was the American conservatives and others, around the world, that kept saying that we defeated communism. That took away the image of the enemy.

You see, the Communist Party is one thing; the communist movement is something else. The people in the movement don’t know it. There are a lot of people who think we have to save the planet by building windmills. Now if we go to war, are we going to have windmills running our fighter jets, big sails pushing our warships?

JRN: No.

JIMMY: Remember, the Soviets and communist China are developing countries. We’re an older country. So the enemy has us targeted: Our economy, our religion, our history, and they are going after our children. When the older generation dies off in twenty or thirty years, there goes a big chunk of the patriotic conservative people in America. Once they’re gone, if we do not turn this around, communists will openly be voted into power and they will gradually tighten things; and by the time people wake up it will be too late.

JRN: Hasn’t this happened already? Haven’t we already been electing communists to high government office?

JIMMY: Yes, we did. Now, people won’t believe this, but I really try to give the benefit of the doubt. You know that. Sometimes you and I have discussions and I play Devil’s Advocate.

JRN: Right.

JIMMY: I can’t believe that every Democrat is a communist. I don’t think they are. Most people are fooled. I use the analogy: Some prostitutes really believe that their pimp loves them. And even after the pimp is put in prison for his crimes, the girl cries saying they are taking away the one who truly loves her. It is a deep psychological need that a pimp is exploiting. That’s how communists exploit people. They help blacks during civil rights. And because they needed help, and the communists were there, they think the communists care about them. But the communists were not doing it because they cared. They did it to gain leadership and control over them. When you pull them all together – the All People’s Front, the Popular Front, the United Front – it’s a massive movement. Meanwhile, the conservatives were neutralized.

JRN: What about the globalists?

JIMMY: Now the globalists make it interesting, because there are globalists who don’t appear to be communists. And they are all pushing for world government. Now sometimes these things overlap. I’ll give you an example. In this American Communist Party publication they are criticizing America for trying to tell North Korea that they can’t have nuclear bombs. So the American communists are defending North Korea’s right to have nuclear weapons – denouncing us. I am just going to read you one sentence. This is from the Communist Party [USA]. Listen to this: “Who gave this administration the right the threaten preemptive strikes – to assume the role of judge, jury and executioner of the non-proliferation treaty? Isn’t that the province of the U.N.?” So here are the communists defending the U.N. as the only “judge, jury and executioner.” That shows the communist movement is working through the United Nations. There you see globalism and communism together.

Now here is one more quote from a communist publication called Socialism and Democracy. This is higher-level stuff. Not intended for the masses. In here they are writing about the World Trade Organization. Remember that the communists are on the streets around the world protesting wildly against the World Trade Organization, because this organization is supposedly capitalist and transnational, working worldwide. But in this publication, that is only meant for communist leadership types, they are showing us something else. This quote is from the Director General of the World Trade Organization: “We are no longer writing the rules of interaction among separate national economies. We are writing the constitution of a single global economy.”

So you have globalism and internationalism, communist and capitalist – just like having big tech getting together and working with the communists.

JRN: Do you think the global capitalists are being duped here? What do the communists plan to do with these people?

JIMMY: The capitalists are not thinking that far ahead. Theoretically there will be no billionaires under communism. But a lot of these people are getting rich in the meantime.

Now another connection which connects all of this stuff: Mikhail Gorbachev, communist leader, made a speech in 1992. Remember, he supposedly lost the Cold War at the end of 1991. But he made a speech May 6, 1992. It was titled, “The End of the Cold War.” This speech was given in Fulton Missouri at Westminster College.

JRN: I have read that speech.

JIMMY: He was saying that we need to develop a moral perspective. We have to save the planet or there will be world conflict. He talked about the destructive nature of nationalism. He said we cannot have half the world democratic and half the world not. Of course, he meant that the communists were the democratic half of the world. The communists say that they are democratic and that we are a capitalist dictatorship. So, stupid conservatives interpret this to say that Gorbachev was talking against communism. Gorbachev also said – if you want to hear a conspiracy theory – that we cannot have a New World Order without structures of coercion and enforcement.

So here you have the New World Order, and you have a communist. Here is a guy who supposedly lost the Cold War, talking about this world government movement. He puts together the U.N. part of it with the communist part of it. What do you have now? You have the communist administration in Washington asking the U.N. to investigate American racism. What Gorbachev did: he pulled together all the various Marxist movements – Trotskyites, Marxists, Marxist-Leninists, all the different socialists, all the humanists – pulled them all together into one mass movement. They got the Democrat Party, which has taken control here. We got censorship, we have indoctrination, we are going to have economic decline. They are on the verge – the communist half and the globalist half – of having a victory over us. We are really that close.

You have the World Council of Churches preaching that America’s military is a sin. So, this KGB group operation says America’s military is a sin. The World Peace Council said America’s military is a threat to peace. The World Health Organization says America’s military is a threat to world health. These are all elements of the communist movement. Yet, it is not seen that way. One is working for religion, one is working for peace, and one is working for health; but that influence, when you add it up, is interconnected, intersected. Nothing here is opposing it. Nobody is stopping it.

JRN: You said something very interesting. You pointed out that the communists are basically advancing communism through various slogans, labels and agendas. They do not have a communist label on them.

JIMMY: Right. That is exactly it. That is why they took away the image. So then they say, “There is no more communism.” Yet the threat now remains – from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and so on. Even Hannity – even Sean Hannity – is saying the threat is Russia and China working with Iran. Iran runs proxy terror groups while Iran is a proxy of Russia and China. In Africa, meanwhile, you had Castro’s troops sent to Africa to help the Soviets. So basically they were mercenaries. They were communist troops fighting to topple both white and black governments. Supposedly there were Marxist groups opposing them, armed by communist China. My analogy here is: If you own all the horses in the horse race, you are guaranteed to win the race.

Today, even in Eastern Europe, where the populations are really afraid of Russia, because even before the Soviets Russia was an imperialist power, those people are rightly worried; but, China is in this mix, too, because China and Russia are partners. We got outsmarted over and over and over again. And when you try to convince somebody they’re wrong, that is like trying to convince a prostitute that her pimp doesn’t really love her.

JRN: Jimmy, you mentioned all these famous conservative pundits: we had Rush Limbaugh who passed away recently, and Sean Hannity, and others, and they were all crowing about our victory in the Cold War. “Ronald Reagan won the Cold War and everything is good now. Communism is defeated.” Haven’t these people done a lot of damage with this kind of talk?

JIMMY: They did an enormous amount of damage. Look, I have no doubt that they are all patriotic, decent, even smart men. They just didn’t understand the deception because they never paid attention. Look, I can’t operate all the features on my cell phone. So I understand how it is to be kind of dumb. Well, they are dumb about something that affects our lives and the world and they don’t know it. By the time people realize what is happening, it could be too late.

When you watch the old war documentaries of the Bataan Death March, you can see thousands of American troops marching as prisoners of war. You ask, “How did they lose?” The point is, they lost. So we could lose, even though we are still here. Now, the communists write what they are going to do when they take over. They actually say what they will do. And you know they will eventually win because they have no opposition. So they write as follows about taking over: We are still going to have the press, the media, the schools, the separation of powers, and the court system; only now these will all have “class content.” We are going to keep everything, only it will all be under communist control. This follows the Antonio Gramsci strategy.

The communists believe that the bourgeoisie controls everything in a capitalist country. Their goal is to build a counter-hegemony. And they did. So everything is going from being capitalist controlled to communist controlled. Now they didn’t consolidate yet. They are very close. The next elections are going to be extremely important. And people say, because of allegations about voter fraud, the election was stolen. But the situation is much worse. We haven’t had an honest election in half a century – because of the influence of the communist movement with its control of the media and the schools. They are shaping people’s thoughts. So you are still voting freely, but you are voting according to information the enemy has put in your head. That is like a jury that only hears the prosecutor.

JRN: So basically, even the conservative pundits, as well as the people on the left, have all been fooled by different aspects of a larger deception.

JIMMY: The Soviets write books. The communist party writes books. They have pamphlets and weekly writings. They hold meetings. If you read that material, you will know how they are doing all this. Years ago, people did watch these things. But then it was outlawed. The FBI could no longer monitor any of this. Now the FBI goes after people who are trying to save America. It’s brilliant.

JRN: By the way, Jimmy, there are not that many anti-communists. Even people who claim to be anti-communist are really anti-something else (anti-globalist, anti-Jewish, anti-corporate).

JIMMY: You cannot have anti-communism if there is no communism. Look, all communists are activists. There is no such thing as a communist who is not active. The definition of a communist is someone who is working for world communism. So an anti-communist would have to be working against communism. If you’re not working actively against communism, you are not an anti-communist. You are just a non-communist.

Instead of pointing to everything that has gone wrong in this country and complaining about it, the conservatives should have understood communism. Then they could explain the threat and organize to stop it. But they don’t do this. Here is an analogy: When there are fires breaking out all over the place, you have to put out the fires. At some point, you have to investigate who is setting the fires. Is it an accident or is someone setting them? You cannot just stop the fires, you have to go after the arsonists. All these things that are going wrong in society, there is a communist element; either to discredit the right or to push Marxism. This isn’t spontaneous combustion. These fires we see – in terms of a political analogy – have been set by someone. There is organization behind it. That is why I say it is brilliant.

Let me offer my Critical Pedophile Theory. Can I read that?

JRN: Sure.

JIMMY: There are all these genders being pushed onto children. Independent mental health researchers came up with the following: “It is said by mental health experts that rape is an act of violence. The rapist is driven by a need to exert power and dominance over their victims, whether male or female. It is not just a need for sex. The teacher’s education bureaucracy and union leaders that push Critical Race Theory and transgenderism on our sweet innocent children also have a sociopathic brain dysfunction and are driven by a need to overpower, dominate, defile, debase, spoil and degrade our children. They commit violence and molest the hearts and souls of our children. They are cultural, social and emotional pedophiles that attack and destroy the innocence and decency of our kids. Theirs is an act of genocide against the youth and future of America. The more these immoral, degenerate terrorists defend their attacks on children, the more it proves the deranged psycho-sexual needs that drive these sociopaths. The louder they defend their assaults, through Critical Race Theory, the sicker they are. They must be stopped and exposed by any means necessary.”

Now that was from an independent mental health researcher named Jimmy from Brooklyn. And it is actually the case. This is what is going on. The people who believe this, and push this Critical Race Theory, are the people who believe in sixty genders. Some of them are just nuts. But the people who designed this movement are brilliant. The best brains in the world work at these think tanks in the Soviet Union, like the Soviet Academy of Sciences. They have whole research centers that just study American history. And they research the history of every country. They use that. Some countries, that they are pushing to become communist, are also being pushed to hate America. Also, they are pushing things that will lead us to destroy ourselves. We destroy our energy sector. We destroy our factories. We destroy our race relations, our schools. The kids can’t read or write, but they are learning sixty different genders.

It’s like I said. It is diabolical but brilliant.

JRN: It is diabolical. Our time has run out and so, Jimmy, thank you so much for that exposition. We must do this again soon.

JIMMY: Any time, and I hope the people that hear me and hear you, all the great work you and others have done, will spread the word. You have got to spread the word. People have to become anti-communist. This is a battle of life and death. If 18-year-old young kids can fight in deserts and jungles in temperatures up to 130 degrees, the American people could start getting involved, politically, emotionally. What they really have to do is spread the message and build a hard-core organized movement. They had better wake up. We are really almost at the end here.

JRN: Yes. We need a hard-core organized movement. Time is running out.

JIMMY: It’s good talking to you. You are doing great work. I hope people spread the word, spread the message. Also, check out videos put out by Alex Newman on common core. Videos put out by Trevor Loudon and also Diana West.

JRN: Absolutely.

JIMMY: Can I read one more quote to end off?

JRN: Okay (laughs).

JIMMY: This is from Antonio Gramsci: “The ideological erosion of the bourgeois order at every level, economic, political, cultural, social, would precede the initiation of direct frontal assaults on the state. This process would occur from the continuous and organic development of the subaltern or oppressed classes.”

This means they are going to attack us at every level; and when they weaken us enough, they are actually going to attack us outright. This is what they are doing, what they have been saying, this is what they are practicing. They have got the first part done and they are going after the state itself. Full-on assault.

JRN: Absolutely. Well, thank you so very much.

JIMMY: God bless.

JRN: God bless.


Quarterly Subscription (voluntary)


The Fool and His Enemy: Toward a Metaphysics of Evil: Nyquist, J.R.: 9798666501382: Books

Also visit (my brother) Greg Nyquist’s new website, The Critical Realist (

147 thoughts on “A Lesson on the Communist Movement: An Expert Speaks

  1. I always thought that the term “Russian Federation” sounded mysterious and rather ominous. Perhaps that is a naive, ignorant thing to say.

    So, according to Mr. Jimmy here, the “Russian Federation” is the Soviet Union, rebranded.

    1. The Communists “changed their formation.” They broke the CPSU into different political parties to give the outward appearance of a Western democracy. But the same basic Communist Party functionaries and KGB overseers continued to run everything in what appeared to be a market economy. People could own their own businesses but all important industries remained under the control of the Party, often through fake billionaires or “oligarchs” who signed secret agreements with the KGB. But the Party was still calling the shots from within the hidden structures they had created to maintain their control. Remember, the economic reforms were all introduced under Gorbachev, under the Soviet government. The same can be said of the “Liberal Democratic” Party under Vladimír Zhirinovsky — a career KGB officer. The new government was merely that of the “independent” Soviet Republic of Russia together with the other Soviet Republics. The governing of the Baltic States snd Ukraine under these conditions suffered dislocations and the secret structures had to retreat and bide their tube. Freedom has been allowed to a surprising extent, but one should not underestimate the power of the communist structures in all the former communist countries where no real lustration has occurred. Remember that freedom was first allowed under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, both communist functionaries who entered the Politburo. But then the old system, masked under a false outward appearance, began to exert pressure — first on old Party apparatchiks, then on the “independent” media which was gradually brought to heel while maintaining a “liberal” veneer.

      1. So, Yeltsin, supposed to be a great friend of the West, especially in the early 1990s, was really a “comrade”?

        Mr. Nyquist, thank you for that explanation. That Soviet murkiness is fascinating.

      2. It is fascinating. Yeltsin was a career Soviet communist and candidate Politburo member. It is ridiculous to believe he could suddenly be a “democrat.” His Kremlin was full of KGB people.

  2. Sorry for the above double post, Mr. Nyquist. I only wrote the second post because I had thought that the first post didn’t take, and so disappeared into the ether. Feel free to delete my first post, as now I think that it is incomplete.

    I also wanted to say that this interview with your guest is very absorbing 🙂

  3. Brilliant observations and understandings by two excellent political scientists. Do either one of you really believe that this worldwide communist movement can be stopped? Although you both mention the need for something to be done and for a movement to rise up, I don’t believe either one of you think that communism will be defeated. And VIrightly so imho. That is the proper assessment after looking at all the facts. It is great to see someone in the public square who thinks and believes like Jeff Nyquist.
    This points to one glaring weakness IMO which is to point your readers to the One who will gain the victory and who will overcome communism and that is Jesus Christ who has been installed as the king of this world. Why is He not even mentioned in this overall assessment of what is going on and what will happen? The Bible is full of political science and yet faith can’t get a seat at the table. Keep up the good work.

    Psalm 2
    1 ¶ Why do the nations rage,
    And the people plot a vain thing?
    2 The kings of the earth set themselves,
    And the rulers take counsel together,
    Against the LORD and against His Anointed, saying,
    3 “Let us break Their bonds in pieces
    And cast away Their cords from us.”
    4 He who sits in the heavens shall laugh;
    The Lord shall hold them in derision.
    5 Then He shall speak to them in His wrath,
    And distress them in His deep displeasure:
    6 “Yet I have set My King
    On My holy hill of Zion.”
    7 “I will declare the decree:
    The LORD has said to Me,
    ‘You are My Son,
    Today I have begotten You.
    8 Ask of Me, and I will give You
    The nations for Your inheritance,
    And the ends of the earth for Your possession.
    9 You shall break them with a rod of iron;
    You shall dash them to pieces like a potter’s vessel.’ ”
    10 Now therefore, be wise, O kings;
    Be instructed, you judges of the earth.
    11 Serve the LORD with fear,
    And rejoice with trembling.
    12 Kiss the Son, lest He be angry,
    And you perish in the way,
    When His wrath is kindled but a little.
    Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him.

    1. I firmly believe communism is predicted in the Bible as the final scarlet coloured beast / form of government in the world before the Lord intervenes. Nevertheless, we must do all in our power to expose and resist it while we still have the liberty to do so.

      1. The statement about the violation of our children was striking. I have come to believe that the assault on children is the key and root of all that is vile in totalitarianism, whatever its form, and I include “soft” Fabianism with its eugenicist bent and Marxist humanism in that category. Child sacrifice has always characterized pagan cultures, and infants lived or died at the whim of their parents in highly civilized Greece and Rome. The violation of children is a hallmark of satanism. Currently, it has been “sanitized” and made respectable through the practice of abortion, which was embraced with gusto by the Soviet Union and China and finally accepted in the West under the banner of women’s rights. Thank you Betty Friedan, communist agent.

      2. Betty was a communist, as you say. Yes. Feminism has had a very negative effect on children. To a very great extent, our education system is a concentration camp for the child.

  4. This interview is very interesting and educative. And I bet that everything written above is part of Kremlin’s global strategy, including the use of China as a part of its own war against the USA. I’m sure.

    1. China and Russia are both under communist control. The control is merely hidden in Russia, just as it is hidden in certain institutions here.

  5. It isn’t even ominous, if one thinks about it: What is now called the “Russian Federation” was previously, under overt Soviet communism, termed the RSFSR, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, the largest and all-dominating republic among the whole of the 15 SSRs, or Soviet Socialist Republics. The cosmetic changes they made were sufficiently transparent for skilled eyes to understand that there was no substantial change at all.

    1. This was meant as a response to the comment at the very top by Janelle Latrouvere.

  6. Excellent interview. Does Jimmy have has own website or podcast? I am familiar with him from radio shows years past, but this is the first time I have heard updated views from him in a long time.

  7. Just a little more on the western globalists, it seems they have decided to model their Great Reset on the CCP’s system, complete with social credit scores and medical tyranny; to what extent, one wonders, are they latecomers to the Marxism show or was that their game all along? Perhaps it doesn’t really matter now at this late stage.

  8. Jeff, I wonder if this writer has been reading your blog! Your ideas appear to be becoming much more plausible to the average conservative. Unfortunately it may already be too late…

    August 1, 2021

    Oh my God, the Delta Variant is going to kill us all!
    By Jack Gleason

    To hear the propaganda media, the new “Delta Variant” of COVID is going to kill every man, woman, and child in America – at least by the end of the week.

    We should all run to the nearest vax center and roll up our sleeves right away.
    Our employers are right to be mandating vaccines and those who refuse are just “science deniers” and should be held down and forced to get their shots. Otherwise, they’re going to kill us all with their virus.
    This new variant is more contagious than smallpox, polio, and measles combined!
    Our colleges are right to force returning students to get their shots.
    Babies should all get their shots the day they’re born. We don’t need their parents’ permission. This is a crisis!
    Just look at all the new cases, up to 63,608 on July 31, up from 11,363 since July 1st. That’s a 459% increase in just 30 days!
    If you want to control people, just scare them and tell them what to do, and scaring them about dying from a mysterious disease is definitely the way to go.

    The remaining members of the general public aren’t getting their shots as they should. Vaccinations have declined significantly since the peak on April first. These “resisters” need a new push and the “Delta Variant” has arrived just in time to justify new draconian measures from governments, corporate employers, and colleges.

    There’s only one problem with all the fear-mongering and widespread panic: few are dying. In the entire United States, 295 people died from COVID on July 31st despite the fact that 62,735 “new cases” were reported the same day.

    Deaths from COVID have been declining steadily since January 16th when 3,197 people died and 234,550 “new cases” were reported. Despite the wide fluctuations in cases, the deaths from COVID have gone from 2,022 on March 1st, 961 on April 1st, 700 on May 2nd, 571 on June 1st, to 295 on July 31st.

    But death rate declines don’t cause panic; that’s why they’re often left out of the charts when the fear-mongering starts.

    The real thing to worry about is the number of side effects from the vaccine which are turning out to be far more deadly than the virus itself. We’ve all heard of the VAERS database that shows “adverse reactions” to vaccines. Estimates vary, but at least 5,000 people have died shortly after receiving their vaccines, which is more than all reported vaccine deaths since the data was first collected. Since only a small percent of adverse reactions are reported, this number could be at least ten times greater. Efforts are underway to get more accurate death and side effects data. And other side effects are off the charts.

    So the real thing to panic about is the vaccines, not this “new” Delta variant.

    No one can say for sure why this psyops operation is trying to get all of our military, our police, our doctors, and nurses to take an experimental shot. If there is something in the “vaccines” that not only has immediate side effects, but long-term compromised immune systems, this would be a great way to inoculate a country into helplessness and submission without a shot being fired.

    And the push to vax college-age kids and children as young as two years old? There are concerns that these vaccines may cause reproductive problems. If I wanted to sterilize a population into non-existence….

    This may sound far-fetched, but the idea of quietly poisoning the enemy’s military and first responders is nothing new, and “birth control vaccines” have been sought for decades, and even introduced into African countries like Kenya under the guise of free tetanus shots.

    Are we in the midst of a silent war? If so, we may already have lost. Are our highest leaders in government and industry participating in our demise by trying to mandate a deadly series of vaccines? Are our social media companies censoring all conflicting data?

    If you have a friend who’s wavering, show them this one website, Have them look at the “new cases” and deaths over time. Invite them to wonder why all this panic is being stirred up in order to get people to give in to vaccine pressure when no one is dying.

    God help us all.

    1. I am alarmed at the irrationality of making people with natural immunity take a shot that will cancel their natural immunity in favor of something less effective — or not effective at all.

  9. “Leisure draws its vitality from affirmation. It is not the same as non-activity, nor is it identical with tranquility; it is not even the same as inward tranquility. Rather, it is like the tranquil silence of lovers, which draws its strength from concord.”
    Josef Pieper, Leisure: The Basis of Culture

  10. Mr. Nyquist, I hope it may be a small encouragement to you, that before morning service Sunday, my pastor had some men hand out pamphlets to the congregation, which contained brief definitions of Communism and socialism, and some of the things that happen when Communism is in control.

    Also, in my work, i communicate with various types of people every week. When conversations or comments turn to Biden, Harris, fuel prices, lumber prices, race relations, etc, etc, I always get the point in that we are seeing the culmination of a Communist takeover in America. I try to plant those seeds in people’s minds.

    To add to your anecdotal evidence of the toxcines (I wont call them vaccines) being useless as well as harmful, I now personally know three people who have taken the toxcine, and later on contracted Coronavirus. And one person who took the jab, and has had alarming side effects ever since (heart rate running away with her on a regular basis, and dry mouth a lot).

    Mr. Nyquist, are you familiar with Jesse Kelly? He has a national radio show, and a Twitter page. I am not able to listen to his radio show, but I read his Twitter feed. He fully realizes we are being taken over by Communism, and tries to awaken his twitter followers to that fact. Maybe you could link up with him somehow, and help him with your information and knowledge, maybe go on his radio show?

    Thank you again for another eye-opening article.

    1. Also, goes w/o saying, that I share your articles and website with people on a regular basis. And should have said thank you for another eye opening article/interview.

  11. [ JIMMY: It has always been. Harry Bridges was the leader. Usually, when the communists control something, they don’t lose it. But the West Coast was known as being under their union. Let me get to religions for a second. ]

    A couple years ago prior to the Covid Live Exercise, I was waiting for Sunday breakfast, listening to the ‘talk down to the homeless,’ sermon at the First United Methodist Church Of Honolulu. The sermon for the housed population is more intelligent. It’s primarily a Tongan congregation.×683.jpg

    They do good work, but after that sermon, I wrote the pastor that Progressive ideology is not Christian theology, and that demonizing the US President, was improper for him to do from the pulpit. He quit doing that after my message to him, but he did obtain a degree from Yale.

      1. The Salvation Army has also been subverted by Liberal theology. When you call them on it, they also tone it down. They try to keep it subtle, and it would seem that they try not too get to exuberant and obvious about their hidden agenda.

  12. Trigo, can you give an example of the Salvation Army’s liberal theology, or maybe a link that details this? We were just getting ready to donate some items to them tomorrow. Who do you donate used items to, instead?

    1. Well, I may have misspoke a bit. They don’t preach liberal theology so much as more of an unsubstantiated giddy Jesus freak cult brain washing. Thing is, Havvai’i is a 99% Democrat state, so the liberalism is imbedded in their attitude and behavior.

      They charge young people for the privilege to volunteer, passing out peanut butter and jelly sandwiches on a rainy night, to people on the street who don’t have a roof over their heads, praying with them, only to leave them behind while the pews and parking garage remains empty six nights per week.

      I suppose apostasy is more common in most denominations nowadays, than not.

      The Salvation Army is the World’s richest charity. They do a lot of good work, and all who call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. It’s just that same as with the Methodists in Honolulu, they leave people without understanding, so they continue to live defeated Christian lives. They don’t enable any of the students to truly defend the Faith.

      Personally, I can’t afford to shop at their thrift stores. The River Of Live Mission, at least gives cloths to the homeless for free. In fact the Sunday Night dinner is provided by Uncle Ernie out of his own pocket, not funded by the Salvation Army, but merely served on their premises, primarily for the benefit of the volunteers, who invite the homeless to dinner.

      I suppose most of the money collected by the Salvation Army, goes to their drug and alcohol rehab center, and temporary home for impoverished single mothers. It’s still a worthy cause.

      1. The irony just now occurs to me. My severally psychotic friend’s family finally came and got her off the street and took her to The Marshall Islands. Six weeks latter, she was back. Bonzai asked me why she came back. I had never spoken to him before, and was surprised that he knew her and that I was her friend, but we attended the Upper Room on Sundays. He told me to send her back, that she’d be better off.

        He’s the one who came back, about the same time that she did. It was a few more years after he left again, the I got her family to come and get her. I was hopping they would take her back to Australia, but they dumped her in the Marshall Islands, again.

        Australia has become a Covid police state. The Marshall Islands is Covid free.

        Miracles do happen.

  13. To help preserve the proper meanings of words, and not let each of our vocabularies get dumbed down, by constant exposure to dumbed down/subverted language, I would encourage people to get a copy of Webster’s 1828 Dictionary. I ordered a used hardback copy on Abe Books earlier this year. If I remember correctly, it cost me around $50. It would have been worth it even if it had been a lot more

      1. Money Quote from “K” above.

        “If you want to control people, just scare them and tell them what to do, and scaring them about dying from a mysterious disease is definitely the way to go.”

        Sentences that go over well for speaking out-loud at the bar or barbecue, we need more of those.


        Trigo, if we managed to change the law, they’d just change it back

  14. Trigo, Southern Baptist leadership has also been infiltrated by Marxist thought.

    1. Hal Lindsey predicted that would happen. Even Lutheran Faith Evangelical Seminary Missouri Synod, has had to ad a liberal track program, and change their name to Faith International, but at least they still offer the conservative old school track as well.

  15. Thank you, Jeff, for this latest piece.

    The following, though, seems very problematic:

    JIMMY: Yeah. They faked that they were getting weak. They were luring in American businessmen to invest money and technology and know-how. … The Soviets were faking collapse.

    Russia was almost continuously at war from 1914 to the end of the Civil War, and the country was in a dire condition. In these circumstances, the New Economic Policy was a necessity, not “faking collapse”.

    The Bolsheviks then shrewdly made a virtue out of this necessity, and, as you say, attracted international investment partly by creating the expectation of a progressive and permanent establishment of a free-market polity.

    If the whole NEP project was a fake, pure and simple, then the Right Opposition of the Communist Party would be impossible to explain, especially in its struggle during the last four years of its existence. The Right Opposition, led by the former left-communist, Bukharin, supported NEP as something desirable in itself rather than just a shabby forced compromise with reality. When NEP was abrogated by the first Five-Year Plan in 1928, the Right Opposition began its struggle, culminating in the “Ryutin Affair” of 1932, which attempted to oust Stalin. Stalin, of course, defeated and wound up the Right Opposition, but he still suffered the humiliation of having his demand for Ryutin’s execution denied by the Politburo (Kirov was one of those voting against).

    JIMMY: They built the illusion that there was a strong opposition in Russia fighting against the communists

    The illusion had some reality to it, since the Right Opposition was effectively fighting for a free market in sectors of the economy (small and medium urban businesses, agriculture in private hands, and private import and export firms), but it was within the Party, whereas Operation Trust sought to create the impression that there was a strong opposition outside the Party, which was a fiction (until after NEP, when peasant resistance to collectivisation effectively became a second civil war). In defeat, the Right Opposition established contacts with Trotsky and his small but international network of organisations, and this, ultimately, led to the “purges” within the Party of the late 30s (when Stalin was finally able to execute both Ryutin and Bukharin).

    It is not remotely credible that the Right Opposition was some kind of theatrical bluff to fool potential Western investors who weren’t even paying attention to such internal fighting within the Party, and especially given the Opposition’s life-and-death struggle that played out during the 30s when NEP was gone and agricultural collectivisation was well underway, so that any supposed bluff was by then an irrelevance.

    I think you will agree, Jeff, that if the NEP period is to be used at all as a point of comparison with the 80s/90s “collapse” of the Soviet Union, it needs to be more accurately portrayed, rather than with such a broad brush that the result is misleading.

    1. Yes. The Bolsheviks had to retreat on economic issues. But they feigned weakness through the Trust. They exaggerated the strength of the right, and made exaggerated bows to the right while retaining all the power they had won in the war. That is, real power (not weakness). The Reds won the Civil War. They had the military strength. They controlled the Red Army. They smashed the sailors who had revolted at Kronstadt. Socialism was the ruling idea. The Communist Party was the ruling party of the country. The economy was in a bad state from War Communism, as often happens to communist states. But as Lenin said, a remedy was at hand. The weakness Jimmy referred to was not the economic weakness you are referring to. It was political realism to recognize the danger in overreaching. They had promised the land to the peasants. Most of the country was involved in agriculture and the Bolsheviks did not possess the strength to collectivize the farms yet. Not giving peasants the land would have backfired on the communists. Lenin and Stalin understood that. After NEP Stalin explained it as a necessary deception “to gather strength.” His comment to Nikolai Bukharin in 1929 was, “You are not a real Marxist.” And Stalin was right. But he had used Bukharin, feigning agreement with such ideas while building power upon power. “What is wrong with you, Bukharin? Didn’t you know we were still Marxists?” The deception was “the fake collapse” of communism as the ruling ideology — that communism had no future in the Soviet Union because Lenin had admitted its failure. Jimmy is not saying they weren’t engaged in a tactical retreat. To make it work, they had to fool the country that the strength of their belief system was gone. They deceived everyone into believing they were moving to the right, ideologically — that Bolshevism and communism itself was politically giving way to capitalism, that they were giving up on Marxism and that even monarchy might soon return. Relax! Normal life is back! But ideology was not dead. The Marxists weren’t really giving up their agenda. They were politically retreating. Deception is always an admission of weakness, in fact; but it is a masking of strength as well (in order to preserve that strength for the next phase). The collapse of communism is an admission of weakness only in the sense that they lacked the strength to force an immediate and total victory for their crazy agenda. Right now the left in Washington would like to impose socialism on the country. But they lack the outright strength to impose it by force. So they allow us to think the ideology of socialism is not such a big deal for them. Relax! Everything will be normal! Take the vaccine! Being realistic, they politically retreat on key issues while hiding the real extent of their fanaticism and the degree to which they control what happens next. What is actually hollowed out by this maneuver, as Jimmy pointed out, is the opposition to communism. Since communism has collapsed, why should there be anti-communism? The communists are so weak they do not exist at all. Why oppose them? The anti-communists look like extremists if they warn that communists are taking over the country or the world. Silly old dinosaurs! The feigned weakness strategy is therefore the pretense that — having gone as far as their strength will take them in any given phase, they pretend to give up their objectives while never actually giving up power. As the opposition mistakes this weakness for total weakness, they do not act so as to defeat the communists by removing them from power. Being deluded by the deception, imagining their position to be strong when it is weak, the right gloats over a victory that was no real victory at all. They are subsequently shocked when they are arrested for treason — as Bukharin was.

      1. “If Biden-Harris is the left in America we have nothing to fear, we’ll turn it around in the mid-term elections.”

        The only person I can trust to be anti-communist is someone who hands out JRNyquist paper articles on the street.

        By the way, why would anyone expect fair elections?

        Be serious.

      2. Thank you, Jeff, for replying at length. Both for the sake of the historical record, and in case any similar patterns should emerge in our own time, I wanted to make sure that it went on the record here that NEP was not simply a subterfuge, and that an important faction within the Communist Party believed in it and wanted it to be maintained, since readers unacquainted with the events might have come away with that impression (even thought you didn’t intend this). The problem of the independent peasantry had to be tackled by the Communists at some point, and I agree with you (and Stalin), that Bukharin was effectively abandoning the communist project, and was fooling himself in thinking otherwise. I am glad to see that there is no substantial disagreement.



    02 AUGUST 2021
    HITS: 40231

    Tonight at 9:00 PM, the Hal Turner Radio Show will air details about a SECOND major lockdown effort to be launched by the illegitimate Biden regime. Nation-wide ! ! ! ! !

    This was revealed last week to SUBSCRIBERS to this web site, as “COVERT INTEL” and as such, they had several days MORE to prepare, than the general public has had.

    If you were a subscriber, you would have known, so maybe you should subscribe to be on the cutting edge of information? It’s only a buck a week, billed quarterly ($13). You can sign-up here, or, if you’re not a subscriber, stay in the dark like the masses. Your choice!

    UPDATE 11:48 PM EDT —

    As revealed on the show Monday evening, a White House source has relayed that the Biden Administration is “working on a speech to be as somber and serious as George W. Bush’s speech on the night of September 11, to convey to the nation how deadly and serious COVID is, and the need to lockdown the entire nation.”

    Put simply, they intend to ask America to do all the things we did last time . . . stay home, wear masks, social distancing . . . none of which worked!

    It is not know on what day the speech will be ready, perhaps by the end of this week, but the source indicated certainly by the end of next week for sure.

    So . . . . we’re all supposed to throw our businesses into the financial trash can . . . again.

    We’re supposed to keep kids home from school . . . . again.

    We’re supposed to not visit friends or family . . . again.

    We’re supposed to avoid travel . . . . again.

    Despite the fact that all the RT-PCR tests they’ve been using for more than a year COULD NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COVID AND THE FLU OR THE COMMON COLD.

    The tests are so utterly useless, the CDC announced they are being stopped because they are unfit to diagnose COVID.

    Yet it is those tests that are reporting the increased COVID numbers . . . again . . . . and we’re all supposed to buy into this crap for . . . how long?

    You’re gonna love this: “Just for two weeks to flatten the curve.” Gee where did we hear that before . . . . oh yea, the last time, and it ended up being like 8 months!

    No thanks.

    This entire COVID thing has not even been a “Pandemic.” It has a 99.8% Survival Rate. THAT is not a dangerous, deadly, pandemic.

    Do some people die? Yes. Just like they do every year with the Flu . . . which magically declined 95% last year because they CALLED all of it “COVID.”

    This is nothing but another round of effort to destroy the life savings of people, destroy small businesses, and make people destitute so the pencil-neck geeks can usher-in their “Great Reset.”

    You’ve heard about that, right?

    It’s where all your debt will be discharged and you won’t owe anyone, anything . . . AND, you’ll get a $2000 a month Universal Basic Income . . . on the condition that you sign away your right to own or possess private property forever.

    Of course, you also won’t own that house you worked thirty years to pay off. You won’t own your car or truck either. Nope. THey will all be assigned to others based on their greater need. Remember, you will own nothing so you have no say.

    That’s the price you will pay for them discharging all your debts.

    The Great Reset: You will own nothing, and be happy. That’s the motto.

    There’s another term for this: Worldwide Communism.

    No thanks.

    I will not comply.

    In this country, no person can be deprived of Life, Liberty, or Property, without Due Process of Law.

    We are free to go out, shop, visit whomever we want, travel, work, engage in commerce at a job or business. We do not need the permission of my public servants to do any of these things. The government works for us, we do not work for the government.

    We cannot be deprived of any of these things without due process. If government wants to deprive us, they have to PROVE that we am either PERSONALLY INFECTED, or have harmed someone by making them sick. The burden of proof is on them, not us.

    If the government wants to close a business, they have to PROVE that the business is either infected or has actually spread sickness to someone.

    What they cannot do is say “There’s a strong likelihood that the business will spread.” That’s not evidence, it is speculation.

    Government cannot deprive someone of their liberty on speculation, there must be actual evidence; evidence of harm.

    So, go to work. Open your business and earn your living. Go out shopping, traveling, to visit friends, family, or customers.

    If government doesn’t like it, tough.

    They work for us, we don’t work for them.

    Our liberty is enshrined in our State and Federal Constitutions and they cannot deprive us of it without due process of law where the burden of proof is on THEM and they must produce actual evidence, not speculation.


    FEMA and FCC Plan Nationwide Emergency Alert Test for Aug. 11 Test Messages Will be Sent to TVs and Radios Along with Select Cell Phones That Have Opted-in to Receive Test Messages

    June 11, 2021
    Release Number HQ-21-119
    Release Date:
    June 11, 2021
    WASHINGTON – FEMA, in coordination with the Federal Communications Commission, will conduct a nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) this summer.

    The national test will consist of two portions, testing WEA and EAS capabilities. Both tests will begin at 2:20 p.m. ET on Wednesday, Aug. 11.

    The Wireless Emergency Alert portion of the test will be directed only to consumer cell phones where the subscriber has opted-in to receive test messages. This will be the second nationwide WEA test, but the first nationwide WEA test on a consumer opt-in basis. The test message will display in either English or in Spanish, depending on the language settings of the wireless handset.

    The Emergency Alert System portion of the test will be sent to radios and televisions. This will be the sixth nationwide EAS test.

    FEMA and the FCC are coordinating with EAS participants, wireless providers, emergency managers and other stakeholders in preparation for this national test to minimize confusion and to maximize the public safety value of the test. The test is intended to ensure public safety officials have the methods and systems that will deliver urgent alerts and warnings to the public in times of an emergency or disaster.

    Major information about the test includes:

    The purpose of the Aug. 11 test is to ensure that the EAS and WEA systems continue to be effective means of warning the public about emergencies, particularly those on the national level. Periodic testing of public alert and warning systems helps to assess the operational readiness of alerting infrastructure and to identify any needed technological and administrative improvements.

    The WEA portion of the test will be initiated using FEMA’s Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS), a centralized internet-based system administered by FEMA that enables authorities to send authenticated emergency messages to the public through multiple communications networks. The WEA test will be administered via a code that alerts only phones that have opted in to receive WEA test messages. The EAS portion of the test will be initiated using FEMA-designated Primary Entry Point stations.

    In case the Aug. 11 test is canceled due to widespread severe weather or other significant events, a back-up testing date is scheduled for Aug. 25.

    Anyone who has opted in to receive test messages on their wireless phone will receive the message only once. The following can be expected from the nationwide test:

    Beginning at 2:20 p.m. ET, cell towers will broadcast the test for approximately 30 minutes. During this time, WEA-compatible wireless phones where the subscriber has opted-in to receive test messages, that are switched on, within range of an active cell tower and whose wireless provider participates in WEA, should be capable of receiving the test message. Wireless phones should receive the message only once.
    For consumers who have opted in to receive WEA test messages, the message that appears on their phones will read: “THIS IS A TEST of the National Wireless Emergency Alert System. No action is needed.”

    Opt-in phones with the main menu set to Spanish will display: “ESTA ES UNA PRUEBA del Sistema Nacional de Alerta de Emergencia. No se necesita acción.”

    Launched in 2012, WEA is a tool for authorized government agencies to reach the American public during times of national emergency. It is used locally to warn the public about dangerous weather, missing children, and other critical situations through alerts on cell phones.

    Alerts are created and sent by authorized federal, state, local, tribal and territorial government agencies through IPAWS to participating wireless providers, which deliver the alerts to compatible handsets in geo-targeted areas.

    To help ensure that these alerts are accessible to the entire public, including people with disabilities, the alerts are accompanied by a unique tone and vibration. The test handling code will allow FEMA to test this capability while limiting test messages to those phones that have opted in to receive test messages.

    The EAS portion of the test is scheduled to last approximately one minute and will be conducted with the participation of radio and television broadcasters, cable systems, satellite radio and television providers and wireline video providers (EAS participants).

    Other important information about the EAS test:

    The test message will be similar to the regular monthly EAS test messages with which the public is familiar. It will state: “THIS IS A TEST of the National Emergency Alert System. This system was developed by broadcast and cable operators in voluntary cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Federal Communications Commission, and local authorities to keep you informed in the event of an emergency. If this had been an actual emergency an official message would have followed the tone alert you heard at the start of this message. No action is required.”
    Emergency alerts are created and sent by authorized federal, state, local, tribal and territorial government agencies. EAS participants receive the alerts through IPAWS or through local “over-the-air” monitoring sources. EAS participants then disseminate the emergency alerts to affected communities

    Background: In 2007, FEMA began modernizing the nation’s public alert and warning system by integrating new technologies into the existing alert systems. The new system, known as the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) became operational in 2011. Today, IPAWS supports nearly 1,600 state, local, tribal, territorial and federal users through a standardized message format. IPAWS enables public safety alerting authorities such as emergency managers, police, and fire departments to send the same alert and warning message over multiple communication pathways at the same time to citizens in harm’s way, helping to save lives. For more information on FEMA’s IPAWS, go to For more preparedness information, go to

  17. Excellent article.

    What I see in it is that the communists win because we’ve spiritually and intellectually disarmed ourselves.

    For example, when I studied at the university, I started out on a STEM track. As part of that, I was taught a definition for “science” so I could recognize what is science, and what is not. That definition limits science to a thin slice of present reality. But today people are so sloppy in their thinking that anything that a “scientist” (whatever that means?) says is “science”, he is to be believed. Even if it’s nonsense.

    That sloppiness isn’t limited to “science”, but to all other areas of life as well. Strict, careful thinking takes work, and to follow that thought with action takes even more work. Easier just to go with the flow. The follow-up to strict thinking is that we contend for the truth, even if only verbally. Going with the flow disarms through laziness.

    Unlike a dance where it takes two to tango, we can be in a war where only one side declares war. We are in such a war. This war is not one primarily of guns and bullets, rather one of ideology propagated through words. In order to fight this war to victory we need a stronger ideology. The only stronger ideology I know is taught in the Bible. Some of us have that stronger ideology, but we make up only a small percentage of our society. If the other side takes over the country, rounds us up and imprisons us, we can win our individual battles by remaining faithful to death. By giving up on a strong ideology, society spiritually disarms itself.

    A relatively small core group of communists can manipulate a larger group of “useful idiots” who then influence a fairly good chunk of society because both the “useful idiots” and the chunk of society know neither who they themselves are nor what types of people are the communists. Their sloppy thinking blinds them to reality, which disarms them in this war.

    A corrupt society is also easier to conquer. This country is full of deception and corruption. I don’t think I need to point out examples of that corruption. By giving up on the pursuit of justice, society disarms itself against the ultimate unjust system, namely communism.

    I see you trying to arm us for this war of ideologies. Thank you for this article.

    1. To R.O. , and others

      You see,

      “Jeff is willing to commit an act of intellectual aggression.” – Anon.

      People that grew up (read an Ayn Rand essay) trained to
      worship the current group opinion, are not willing.

      Those are the people that need __________, and __________.

      I’m willing, but it has to be effective, not pro forma.

      Given my heritage, and personality.

      To R.O. , and others

      You see,

      “Jeff is willing to commit an act of intellectual aggression.” – Anon.

  18. Once again, an outstanding (and alarming) exposé, Jeff. The scope of the Marxist global invasion leaves little to no hope of us mere mortals reversing and overcoming the ruination.

    I would love to read your take on the imminent vax mandates … their purpose and how we might yet avoid taking the mark of the brainwashed.

    1. “If the psychic energies of the average mass of people watching a football game or a musical comedy could be diverted into the rational channels of a freedom movement, they would be invincible.”
      Wilhelm Reich

      By the way, Biden-Harris ARE NOT the left in America.

    2. I wish I fully understood all this. The key question we must demand an answer to: What role did Chinese companies or scientists have in developing our vaccines — the vaccines we use but that China is pointedly not using?

      1. Good point about China not using the mRNA vaccines. But now, it ALMOST doesn’t matter whether the fingerprints on our vaccines are Xi Jinping’s, Bill Gates, or some other communist puppet.

        This all kind of feels like we’re hunkering down in the midst of a Category 5 landfall … which would make it pointless to let our minds wander to when and where the proverbial butterfly wings initiated it all far, far away.

      2. To: JRN

        Tucker should give lessons on the method of common sense.

        To wit.

        Slam two facts together or a fact and something else, like a quote,
        or speculation, or even 1,000 quotes.

        Till your brain starts hurting, or the people around you tell you that
        you’re being a bore.

        Seriously Tucker, isn’t the deadly left dictating what you say?

        Some Regards


      3. It was either a reporter or an Army bioweapons soldier, who told me that China’s vaccines were good, but that the US wanted US companies to get the revenue, so Trump delayed in making vaccines available.

        I don’t think it matters which ones. In ten years, all the vaccinated will come down with autoimmune diseases. Everyone already has immunity to all SARS variants, so why vaccinate anyone at all?

        Also, I wonder if the exponential increase in variant strains isn’t the objective itself? Since everyone already has the antibodies, it’s similar the HIV; retro viruses being inert by definition.

        Dr Kary Mullis says that HIV does not cause AIDS, but that it may be due to a virus overload.

      4. [ JEFF NYQUIST says:
        AUGUST 3, 2021 AT 8:24 PM
        Are you sure? ]

        I am sure that if ruffians attempt to forcibly vaccinate me, I shall empty-handedly, terminate at least three of them.

      5. I am fully vaccinated and will continue checking in with this blog to let everyone know I’m still alive. Maybe after 6 months you all will start considering that just maybe the vaccine is actually just a vaccine intended to get us closer to the end of this pandemic, and not some diabolical Communist bio-weapon. How much time must pass before the paranoia wears off? Will it ever? Time will tell.

      6. Apparently you are not skeptical of authority. You have put your body into the experiment. Good luck to you. Some of us have already been injured by doctors assuring us that a treatment or drug is safe. I have had this experience, and so has my sister. She almost died from doctors. Trust authority? Since when did your kind decide to trust authority? It’s never the smart thing, though it may be expedient to keep your head down. Always ask questions, especially when your rights are being threatened.

  19. “Presidential Policy Directive / PPD-8 is aimed at strengthening the security and resilience of the United States through systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the nation, including acts of terrorism, cyber attacks, pandemics, and catastrophic natural disasters.”

    What was PPD-8? It was a 2011 deep dive analysis into the vulnerabilities of the US to terrorist attacks by the Obama administration assisted by John Brannon. Now you would think such an investigative search would discover and patch vulnerabilities. This along with a fundamental change within the CIA of how information was gathered opened the doors of American weaknesses; from closed door only within the agency to a policy of using foreign partners (of course who would have their own agendas and produce massive security vulnerabilities).

    Was it with this analysis that it was discovered the vulnerabilities of “gain of function” research? Only after an accidental release in Georgia was there a feigning from the Obama administration against such research. Are we to believe that a rogue player named Fauci took it upon himself to fund and move this continuation of “GOF” to China, our enemy, unbeknownst to the Obama administration? …….right. Always there is a patsy ready to take the fall in the whirlwind of plausible deniability.

    Communists have a love of patsies but also dry-runs. They obsess about testing their theories and the population’s response before the actual implementation. 2013 and 2015 was the actual birth of the anti-police scam as well as the seedlings which produced BLM in the US. With the population response to bringing in UN peace keeping groups to combat the newly minted slogan of “Domestic Terrorist” in Chicago as well as the near fatal situation with local Wisconsin residents and almost laughably overly armed and masked mine security forces. It was clear they would need much support in Democratically run cities to replace Domestic law enforcement with a global UN governance. Creating a narrative where the Domestics would be labeled racist and murderous would create support for the dismantling and replacement. Current calls for the UN to analyze racism in this Country is just a progressive step to replacing law enforcement with a UN global force. I disagree that there is an overlap between the UN Globalists and Communist players. To dig deeper into those who currently run the UN you will find a great deal of China control on the surface and undoubtedly Russian influences beneath that.

    Let’s look at the term “Domestic Terrorist”; a reactionary term well defined as radical Muslim extremists and heavily and deliberately connected to the National trauma of 9-11. Notice how it has slowly been morphed to mean any group now against the Marxist/Communist agenda narrative in the US. A term with a universal condemnation now attached to Patriotic Americans who would fight against a Communist take over of the US. That new definition spouted as the most dangerous group in America. So taking this pattern into account it is easy to see the use of a past respected entity like the UN being completely morphed into a Trojan horse for the destruction and replacement of law enforcement and governing bodies in the US. To me, there is no separation between these Communist players and the current UN. They are one in the same and their attempted Coronation of another patsy Obama tells me much about alignments and cements a deep worry about PPD-8 and how that information has been used to the Nation’s demise.

    It would make a great deal of sense to use a growing panic of Covid cases when the population’s trust is completely broken in the vaccines (as predicted by the brilliant Dr. Greet Vanden Bossche) to create a cyber or grid attack. Without a steady flow of information about growing numbers of illnesses, there would be panic. This would be the optimum time for a physical attack, at the very least they would allow us to crash and devolve into chaos and then the population would beg for UN assistance and welcome them with open arms. With a Nuclear Country the path of least risk would be desirable.

    With every action there is a reaction. To be of the mindset to plan so thoroughly for so long presents a wealth of opportunities. I remain hopeful.

      1. Agreed, however it is easy to become isolated in our viewpoints with so much turned on its head. There is much testing the waters on the other side. That tells me that they also just do not know for certain the level of defensive strategy.

      2. Because on our side we don’t know is not the only reason we hesitate, we also hesitate because if we act now, we play right into our enemies’ hands. In the mean time, we need to study up, both on their tactics and how to counter them, both now when it’s arguing ideology, and for the possibility (which I hope never happens) when they decide to go kinetic. They need to fire the first shot.

      3. “We hesitate because on our side we just do not know.” – J.R.Nyquist

        And how much of that lack of conviction, is self created, willingly, half-consciously?

        When someone is pointing two six guns at your belly across
        the card table, and has a mean scowl on their face, AND
        HAS a rep for killing people – JUST HOW MUCH – knowledge
        of their specific five card hand do you NEED?

        In the words of an immortal, “GET CONSCIOUS FATHEAD!”

        Not talking to Jeff or posters here, but only the blind kittens.
        Not talking to Jeff or posters here, but only the blind kittens.
        Not talking to Jeff or posters here, but only the blind kittens.
        If they are wandering by, If they are wandering by.

      4. In Melbourne they know. Delta is a dud with only 13% vaccinated. The Ozzie government leave them alone because they marched in the streets without masks, protesting the stay at home lockdown.

        Nevertheless, police helicopters round people up in Sydney.

    1. If it talks like a bureaucrat, it shoots like a bureaucrat.
      and you can quote me on that. – Anon.

  20. Nice interview. It’s interesting how Russia and China have used this good cop bad cop play on the rest of the world, long ago it was said if the US helped China, they would become an ally against Russia, and also a free nation after investment there. Now the situation is reversed, Putin is often talking in public how he’s a cool guy who respects tradition as opposed to the moral decay of the West, while Xi Jinping elbows his way around the world with his “submit to the CCP, or else” blackmail diplomacy.

  21. “To put an end to all the rumours and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika – and the program as a whole, for that matter – is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy.”

    Mikhail Gorbachev: Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World; p. 36. Harper Collins 1987.

      1. Of course they are! Like any good acolyte of Satan, he speaks in decipherable riddles that only the truly devout soldier of God can see through.

  22. “[…] It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen now! […] Sooner or later, other armies will also have the technology, the weapons, even the most advanced ones. But this does not worry us, since we already have it and will have even better armaments in the future. […] It was our duty to inform our partners of what I said here today under the international commitments Russia had subscribed to. When the time comes, foreign and defence ministry experts will have many opportunities to discuss all these matters with them, if of course our partners so desire. […] Now we have to be aware of this reality and be sure that everything I have said today is not a bluff ‒ and it is not a bluff, believe me ‒ and to give it a thought and dismiss those who live in the past and are unable to look into the future, to stop rocking the boat we are all in and which is called the Earth. […] There is no need to create more threats to the world. Instead, let us sit down at the negotiating table and devise together a new and relevant system of international security and sustainable development for human civilisation. We have been saying this all along. All these proposals are still valid. Russia is ready for this. […] We are interested in normal and constructive cooperation with the United States and the European Union. We hope that common sense will prevail and our partners will opt for honest and equal work together. […]”

    Vladimir Putin: Annual Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly of 2018, given on March 1, 2018 at the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall, Moscow; excerpts.

  23. Mr. Nyquist, just got your book, The Fool and His Enemy, in the mail. Cant wait to read it, but I just started reading another book I had ordered that I have seen you refer to, Ideas Have Consequences. I believe that I am going to have to read them slowly.

  24. I came across an interesting tidbit when reading the plot of the extremely popular Chinese action movie, “Wolf Warrior”. Part of the plot is that a Filipino warlord, (assisted by an ex navy SEAL), attempts to steal, from China, a cache of smuggled biotechnology that will allow him to create a bioweapon that affects only Chinese. It is interesting that this concept worked its way into their entertainment, (imagine the response if a movie was made about a bioweapon which only affected whites). Is it just a sign of Chinese ethnic paranoia? Or are they accusing their enemies of something they plan to do themselves?

    1. @Luke. Of course, they would use a Filipino as a “warlord”. (Have you heard/read about the rampant abuse against Filipino maids in Hong Kong?) The Chinese can’t bare to loose face, even though they are the ones responsible for the destruction.

      This is why I do not watch movies or have a telly anymore. The owners of Hollywood and Social Media/press are Chinese ethnics (Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai/Siamese et al) and want to MUDDLE our minds. Big businesses control the politicians, press, pop culture, and schools. They were gifted these wealth and power by so-called Conservatives and Democrats (probably addicted to Kung Fu and take outs).

      There is an anti-intellectual agenda that thrives on making the masses shallow, dumb, greedy, self absorbed, and degrading intellectuals as “nerds” never before seen in the last century. Why did people line up to take the shots despite videos posted of injuries and deaths?

      A former Pfizer employee has been publicly detailing how the GRAPHENE in all the so-called vaccines is patented by a Chinese company and made in China— Sinopeg.

      They have destroyed their homeland to an irreversible level.

      There is no question that they will do anything unethically to dominate the world.


  25. What a great interview! Thank you for doing this!. When I was reading the part about The Trust, I remember a TV series back in the 1980s, titled “Reilly, Ace of Spies” based on the life of Sidney Reilly who was a Russian born British spy who nearly brought down the Bolsheviks. Am I remembering correctly? Do you know anything about the real Reilly?

    1. Yes, you have a good memory. The British series on Reilly recites the career of one of the best secret agents in history. Reilly disappeared while on a mission to the Soviet Union in 1925 (going by memory). It is believed he was executed by the Soviet Union. There is a theory that he switched sides.

  26. The Communists have always known they were playing poker against a better-equipped adversary. They were realistic that their factories were not the well-oiled wealth-generating machines that the West (particularly America) had to offer so they went after IDEAS.

    Ideas, weaponized ideas or otherwise, are cheap, reproducible and powerful. Remember: “The pen is mightier than the sword.” America might be the Arsenal of Democracy, but the Soviet Union was going to be the Arsenal of Ideas.

    The mass starvation of Ukrainians was easily hidden by the Soviets from the general world press because the world did not want to hear of it. The press did not want to report it, and the readers wanted to ostrich-head their way out of gross details. That is a neat, concise metaphor for most of the West’s contact with what the East was doing. It’s a sad, sordid tale of keeping your head in the ground.

    — Catxman

      1. There is sometimes mentioned a fourth “wise monkey”: “smell no evil” :p

        In all seriousness, though, I think that this particular phrase relates to spiritual discernment and, perhaps, to being able to judge right from wrong.

      2. “What does evil smell like?”

        In my limited experience, it is a rotting & burnt flesh, noxious, reeking, sour, putrid, nauseating, somewhat sulfurous scent that will take your breath away, no matter how little of it you detect.
        My mouth watered, my nose burned, my hand shook, my stomach constricted, I felt nausea, dizziness, panic, shortness of breath, blurry vision, headache and heart palpitations.
        I was exposed to it by a preacher, “So you will know,” in a short trip to a crime scene, a 13 year old (at the time) crime scene from 1988!

      3. What a great and sane response to Jeff’s rhetorical joke question. Really reflects the overall sanity of the ideas on this blog. Great job everyone.

  27. Jeff, not sure if you can comment in regards to thenGrand Solar Minimum, I was looking through some research submitted by the following scientists:

    1. John L. Casey former NASA engineer, advisor and author of books like Dark Winter, Cold Sun and Upheaval
    2. Valentina Zharkova
    3. Habibullo Abdusammatov
    4. Nils-Axel Mörner
    5. Theodor Landscheidt

    They are saying that the 2030’s will be the coldest and a critical time as well

    This is from a website that is dedicated to Theodor Landscheidt is saying about the 2030’s:

    ‘If Dr. Landscheidt is correct about this, we are about to enter an extended period of much reduced solar activity and therefore an extended period of global cooling, which will offer the first real world test of the IPCC’s CO2 forced global warming claims. On the downside of this, a return to climate conditions not experienced since about 1670 by the year 2030 will bring much hardship to millions, as many of the world’s foodbowls fail due to extreme cold, while demand for fossil fuels will increase just so people can survive the extreme cold in higher latitudes.’

    1. Mr Alex, familiar with John Casey and the others, the following is a book published by Carlton Brown which definitely bears reading as he figures we are about 8K years farther into the next glaciation than is commonly believed. Obviously, this makes the situation even more critical because the next “little ice age” may be actually heralding the return to glaciation not seen for 19 to 22 thousand years!

      “Revolution(RE) Ice Age Re-Entry”
      By Carlton B. Brown Kindle Edition: Published October 28th 2018, 1st Edition.

      “It is my contention that we are disoriented as regards the stage of the glacial cycle that we occupy today. The biggest impediment to gaining a correct orientation on today’s climate is failing to look back beyond 1880, and indeed back to the Holocene Climate Optimum, when interpreting climate data. Additionally, the polar ice core temperatures are more relevant to climate forecasting than the global mean surface temperature. This is because the global climate optima lag the polar climate optima. Thus, the global climate data is consequential to what is happening in the polar regions.”

      “First, the ice age did not end 11,700 years ago. It was the Younger Dryas that ended then. Second, the Holocene Climate Optima for the Antarctic, Arctic, and global climates are millennia behind us, and these were comparatively late relative to all other glacial cycles over the past 800,000 (Antarctica data) and 1,000,000 (global data) years. Implicit in the IPCC’s statistically flawed 30,000-year ice age deferral is the assumption that the Holocene Climate Optimum lies ahead of us, an assertion that is contradicted by the ice core data.”

      Brown, Carlton. Revolution: Ice Age Re-Entry (p. 35). Atitlan Press. Kindle Edition.

    1. Jeff: you might want to read this article Fauci is feint displaying his hand in a subtle way, thinly disguisedly what the Chinese do in fact have something possibly far worse becoming at the end of the year.

      1. China has too, many people, Jeff. Every country in the World is obviously on board with this deadly canard.

      2. Yes of course…it is OBVIOUS what is happening. The OBVIOUS scenario is that hundreds of millions, if not billions of people will be dead within 18 months from the vaccine. OBVIOUSLY this is the most likely scenario. It couldn’t be more OBVIOUS that those of us alive right now are so uniquely special that we are pawns in the OBVIOUS plans of the devious geniuses: The Communists. Anyone who doesn’t see this OBVIOUS plot is a doomed fool who will never live to see the return of Christ, like the spiritual chosen who avoid the vaccine get to.


  28. Jeff, knowing all of this what is the relationship between India and China like? Wouldn’t India be China’s nearest and natural enemy, so to say? They had some border clashes, have a similar population size, wouldn’t India be a deterrent to chinese ambitions?

    1. India does not have the strength to defeat China, and is easily overpowered by positional warfare. The Chinese have breached the Himalaya range (defensive barrier) with important bridgeheads in key places like the territory they took from India in Kashmir during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. I know India still has a fairly solid mountain chain to hold its border, but India is effectively surrounded and this barrier can be breached. In a war, the country of India will find itself besieged. Why? Strategically, India does not have an effective way to attack China. It can be screened off and left to die on the vine. India is geographically remote in terms of military support coming from America or Europe. Just look at a map. India’s lack of naval strength and China’s position in Sri Lanka means that India will suffer a crippling naval blockade from the outset of any war and will eventually be forced to surrender. The Indian Ocean is destined to become a Chinese lake. South Africa and the Cape is within China’s grasp even now, and Australia is a speed bump. The Suez Canal is easily shut down. Possibly, India will be diplomatically shown the futility of military resistance to Chinese regional hegemony. If the U.S. cannot defend Taiwan, then India is not defensible for the same reasons. See the following:

  29. Hi Jeff,
    I remember a reference to a secret plan that I believe you mentioned years ago. It was concocted by some Columbia Univ. professors and the goal was to round up and eliminate all dissenters who didn’t agree with liberals/Marxists that would take over America. There was something mentioned at that time about internment camps in the Southwest US. Does that ring a bell? Would you have some references or articles regarding that plan? I wonder if that plan might be implemented to deal with those that are unvaccinated for covid, among others.

    1. Are you referring to testimony from the fellow who infiltrated the Weather Underground decades ago? They were talking about rounding up tens of millions of Americans for liquidation when their Revolution succeeded.

      1. William Charles Ayers. “In 1969, Ayers co-founded the Weather Underground, a self-described communist revolutionary group that sought to overthrow imperialism.”
        “Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at.”

        “The thing the most bone chilling thing Bill Ayers said to me was that after the revolution succeeded and the government was overthrown, they believed they would have to eliminate 25 million Americans who would not conform to the new order,” said Larry Grathwohl, a former FBI agent.

        Did you see the quote by the Moderna CEO.
        Vaccine developers at Moderna “are looking forward towards our vision of a single dose annual booster that provides protection against COVID-19, flu and [respiratory syncytial virus] for adults. … We believe this is just the beginning,” CEO Stephane Bancel said.

        Yep, a mandatory annual Covid/Flu/Respiratory Virus “SHOT.”

        Dr. David Martin said this very thing in a stunning interview last month.

      2. Yes. This is very crazy. The government cannot mandate medical treatments for everyone. That would make us government property.

    2. Here is a brief clip from an interview that must have been way longer. His name was Larry Grathwohl. He died in July 2013, age 65, supposedly under slightly mysterious circumstances:

    3. Anyone who claims citizenship in the United States, under the illegitimate 14th Amendment, voluntarily, becomes property of the State. It’s veneer under colorable law. The people are being challenged to show Government that it won’t work.

    4. Larry Grahwohl interview:

      also wrote a book about what he experienced as an FBI informant. Former Nam vet. He passed away about 10 years ago. Glad he survived the infiltration and to be able to warn us today. The man was a real hero!

  30. [ Malone argued that the “more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk.” ]

    Rand Paul rips Fauci for ‘variant’ fears: ‘We’ve stopped listening’

    ‘America has been damaged enough by lies from … power-hungry bureaucrats’
    Art Moore
    August 5, 2021

    Sen. Rand Paul, who has famously clashed with Dr. Anthony Fauci over coronavirus policy, is urging Americans to “send a message” to the White House health adviser: “We’re done listening to you!”

    The Kentucky Republican senator’s email to supporters Wednesday came after Fauci advised vaccinated Americans to wear a mask and warned that the nation is “in trouble” because people who refuse to be vaccinated are allowing the delta variant to spread, the Washington Times reported.

    Paul said the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has “inflicted an enormous amount of pain and suffering on the American people already.”

    “And when he promises even more, you know he really means it. You see, King Fauci knows that his power depends on keeping the public afraid. That’s why he’s now going around whipping up fear and vowing to bring about more suffering and restrictions.”

    The senator said that advising vaccinated Americans “to wear a mask” is “insane.”

    “It makes no logical sense. It’s dangerous pseudoscience,” he said. “America has been damaged enough by lies from the ruling class and power-hungry bureaucrats like Fauci. It’s time for the American public to send a message to Fauci — we’re done listening to you!”

    In an interview published Wednesday by McClatchy, Fauci warned of trouble due to the “very steep fashion” in which the delta variant is spreading.

    “What we’re seeing, because of this increase in transmissibility, and because we have about 93 million people in this country who are eligible to get vaccinated who don’t get vaccinated — that you have a significant pool of vulnerable people,” he said.

    “And so when you look at the curve of acceleration of seven-day averages of cases per day, it is going up in a very steep fashion. … I think you’re likely going to wind up somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 cases.”

    But Paul has argued that the death rate of the delta variant is very low.

    “Don’t let the fearmongers win,” he tweeted June 29. “New public England study of delta variant shows 44 deaths out of 53,822 (.08%) in [an] unvaccinated group.”

    Some scientists have contended that the vaccines are driving mutations, arguing it’s unprecedented to mass vaccinated during a pandemic.

    In a column for the Washington Times, Dr. Robert Malone, writing with former Trump adviser Peter Navarro, said the Biden administration’s “strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.”

    Malone argued that the “more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk.”

    In February, NPR explored that possibility on its “Morning Edition” program, publishing the text of the segment under the headline Vaccines Could Drive The Evolution Of More COVID-19 Mutants.

    Fauci said in an interview Sunday with CBS’ “Face the Nation” that the levels of coronavirus in breakthrough cases of the delta variant among those who are fully vaccinated are “almost identical” to the levels among the unvaccinated.

    Malone reacted on Twitter: “‘Almost Identical’ sounds a lot like a modified limited hangout to me. C’mon, we can handle it. Show us the data. Enough of your spin please. Stop hiding.”

    Conservative author Daniel Horowitz tweeted on Thursday: “It is a simple fact at this point that a person with prior infection but no shot is much safer to be around than one with the shot but without prior infection. The fact that our policies reflect the opposite is insane.”

    In an interview Wednesday on CNN, Centers for Disease Control Director Rochelle Walensky said the vaccinated can infect the vaccinated but insisted the the spike in cases has been caused by unvaccinated people.

  31. Jeff and 907IE not sure if you can comment, Carlton Brown has made a PDF copy of his book Ice Age Re-entry available on In order to download, it requires a registered account, the download is free:

    This is what Carlton Brown had to say about the ice age being delayed:

    The IPCC’s 30,000-Year Ice Age Deferral Is Statistically Falsifiable

    There are crucially important statistical implications relating to this “new IPCC theory” for delaying the next ice age by 30,000 years. The statistical implications have been ignored (I am assuming), and would
    automatically lead to the dismissal of this theoretical delay. The statistical implications relate to how this delay adjusts the interval back to the previous ice age, the interglacial period duration, and the relative phasing gap between the Antarctic and global climate optima, when compared with all previous glacial cycles in the last 800,000 (Antarctica) and 2,000,000 (global) years.

    By extending the start of the ice age another 30,000 years from its “real start” 2,100 years ago (global data), the interglacial period duration is extended. The last interglacial period started 19,600 years ago and ended 2,100 years ago at the Holocene Climate Optimum. Consequently, the interglacial period would increase from its existing 17,500 years to 49,600 years, rendering the revised 49,600-year interglacial period duration a statistically significant outlier (see the data table summary embedded in the

    Similarly, by ignoring the global climate optimum 2,100 years ago and extending the interglacial period by another 30,000 years, one would be positing a new Holocene Climate Optimum 30,000 years in the future. Creating a new Holocene Climate Optimum would extend the already longest interval, going back to the previous climate optimum, from 122,700 years to 154,800 years.

    Compared with all thirty-two preceding climate optima intervals in the last 2,026,800 years, this revised 154,800-year interval would become a statistically significant outlier. The original non-delayed climate optimum interval, while an outlier, was not a statistically significant one (See the data in the following citation).

    In the third statistical analysis, the timings for the last nine glacial cycle climate optima in Antarctica were compared with their corresponding global climate optima timings, to determine the phasing gap for each glacial cycle. In all but two glacial cycles, the climate optimum was reached first in Antarctica, and on average 2,100 years before it was reached globally. The global climate optimum 2,100 years ago already had the longest phasing gap with its corresponding Antarctic climate optimum, compared with all previous Antarctic and global phasing gaps in the past 800,000 years.

    By delaying the Holocene Climate Optima 30,000 years, the phasing gap between Antarctica EPICA Dome-C (10,500 years ago) and the global (2,100 years ago) data changes from 8,400 years to 40,500 years, rendering this revised phasing gap a statistically significant outlier (See the data in the following citation).

    By delaying the Holocene Climate Optima 30,000 years, the phasing gap between Antarctica EPICA Dome-C (10,500 years ago) and the global (2,100 years ago) data changes from 8,400 years to 40,500 years, rendering this revised phasing gap a statistically significant outlier (See the data in the following citation).

    1. Excelent points, Mr. Alex.
      I actually bought the Brown book back when it came out and have found his conclusions very reasonable as well as well reasoned. His statistical analysis is impressive.
      Obviously, we don’t have 30,000 plus years, and there is a real possibility that the coming “minimum” will actually be more severe than any of the recent ones.

  32. “It is the American vice, the democratic disease
    which expresses its tyranny by reducing
    everything unique to the level of the herd.”
    Henry Miller

    Non-socialism = “I am not a herd animal.”

    In other words:

    “I don’t let any random so-called Alpha
    Male lead me anywhere.” Not in 2021-2022 USA.

    Or in other words:

    “The desires of the herd equal zero.”

  33. Just returned from visiting some relatives this evening. My uncle took the toxcine, 3 or 4 days ago. Been sick ever since, and he is a very active, healthy man.

    1. Don’t worry. It just means he is developing strong antibodies….so sorry to hear that. Many people I personally know had similar experiences and worse.

      1. Thing is, he already had Coronavirus about 5 months ago. I took him and my aunt some Ivermectin at that time, and it really helped them get better. But he decided to get the shot this week. I just dont understand. People arent thinking this through.

      2. Research how vaccines severely reduce the danger of the virus to the individual, and maybe you’ll understand why someone might get it. There’s no big mystery. People who don’t want to die from Covid get vaccinated.

      3. Less than one percent of the population is at risk of death from Covid. Unless you are very sick or very old, the danger is very small. The vaccines, however, are experimental and involve a new technology that changes the way your body responds to this type of infection. Nobody really knows what the risks of this technology are. If you say you know, you are not being honest.

    1. The above post is meant as a response to @JRNyquist’s assertion that “the Indian Ocean may become a Chinese lake.” I have no idea how it ended up down here as a completely separate statement.

  34. What do we make of the A-10 tankbusters doing dispersal training on public roads in Michigan in recent days? Is this a belated attempt at preparing for a land invasion of CONUS? Also, the RAF in the UK have been doing the same in recent weeks with its Typhoon fighters, which is not normal at all.

      1. Forgive me for being dense. Do you mean these exercises could be preparing to fight against invading foreign forces ? Or to assist the invaders / put down the populace ?
        Jeff and or Anonymous could answer I guess.

      2. Dispersal of aircraft to highways is something you do when you expect your airbases will be attacked. In this instance, they are training for an attack on CONUS.

    1. If you’re putting down domestic unrest, you probably don’t need A-10 tank busters involved and you certainly don’t need dispersal training exercises because it’s pretty unlikely the civilian population is capable of eliminating air bases. I agree with Jeff, this is probably prep for an invasion of CONUS.

  35. Anonymous, research the serious side effects of the toxcines, including death. Also the fact that you have a 98 or 99 percent chance of surviving the virus. Also the fact that this substance has not been sufficiently tested. Also the fact, that to me trumps all others, that in one way or another, aborted fetal tissue was used in the development of these poisons.

    If for no other reason, I will not put something in my body that was developed using any part of an innocent, unborn, human life.

    That is an awfully cowardly way for a society to “survive”. What kind of society is that, which would use innocent life to keep from getting sick? I think we all know what kind of society that is.

    1. By saying “developed”, I do not mean all of them necessarily have aborted fetal cells in them, or cell lines. But several do, and all were at least very probably tested on the cell lines.

      1. Grey night

        Good posts. The AstraZeneca and the J&J were actually cultured in the fetal cell lines. The Pfizer and Moderna were not cultured in the cell lines but the cell lines were and are used for testing.
        I share your disgust for using the fetal cell lines. The way that the tissue was procured may be even more troubling than you might think.
        If you want to check out the back up info on this, Pamela Acker is a good source. Knowledgeable on vaccines. On YouTube and has a short book out on vaccines.

  36. Tom Doyle, thank you for the info. I looked her up last night. Will watch some of her videos. Checked out the book and ordered it too.

Comments are now closed.