“Politics is the continuation of war by other means.”
Lenin
Lenin inverted Carl von Clausewitz’s dictum that “war is the continuation of politics by other means.” Lenin’s lust for war was so great, he politicized everything so that everything would be swallowed by war.
Today you cannot talk about anything of consequence without blundering into a battle zone. If you talk about sex you will find yourself threatened by Lenin’s unwitting epigones, the feminists. If you say something about the weather, you must blame capitalism for it. Try not to notice that Earth Day, April 22, is Lenin’s birthday. One must never point out that the assassins of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy were communists, or that Kamala Harris grew up in a communist household. You must blame everything on the CIA at all times, and never suspect that the CIA itself has been infiltrated by communists. In fact, one should never use the word “communist,” and always spit when pronouncing the name “Joseph McCarthy.”
In Lenin’s war the communists have won many battles, and the ground they occupied yesterday is not for retaking today. When the communists want to take more ground, they say that Nazis are occupying that ground. Please remember that anticommunists are to be associated with Nazism, racism, and sexism. They are also said to be destroyers of the environment, plunderers of the poor, warmongers and religious bigots.
The communists have several advantages: First, they usually have the initiative. Second, they tend to control their opposition. Third, have confused nearly everyone with outrageous lies. Fourth, they own a lot of corrupt people. And fifth, the disasters they have planned will probably be blamed on conservatives, on Christians, on the rightwing. We already hear them suggesting that patriotic Americans are traitors and terrorists.
Last Saturday I spoke in Milwaukee at a gathering of the American Freedom Alliance. The event was titled, “World War III, the Early Years.” And yes, we can see that Lenin’s war has reached our shores and is beginning to wear down our defenses. Many of our leading politicians have sold out to Red China while others repeat Kremlin talking points. Given the many “agents of influence” in Washington, London, Paris, and Berlin, how can we stop the communists from disrupting our defenses? On Saturday, Trevor Loudon told the American Freedom Alliance that “the Deep State is Russia and China”; that we are once again confronting a communist bloc alliance. Only this time the bloc has infiltrated the U.S. Government at the highest levels.
And what have the infiltrators been up to? They have been busy bankrupting us. They are debasing the currency. They are flooding our cities with illegal aliens. They are enabling criminals. They are weaponizing the justice system to keep law-abiding citizens from protesting. Many in our government have adopted Lenin’s dictum, “The worse, the better.” And so, they are making everything worse and worse.
It is no accident that these politicians follow another of Lenin’s dictums: “Telling the truth is a petty-bourgeois prejudice. Deception, on the other hand, is often justified by the goal.” And what is the goal? To wipe out the existing social system and replace it with totalitarianism.
Is there hope? Robert Spencer said during the conference, “Something in the human soul makes for the fall of totalitarian regimes.” That something, of course, is truth. Talking to the group about freedom of speech, Northern Ireland’s Peter Mcilvenna warned, “Unless America comes back to truth, it will lose its right to exist.”
Examining the Big Deception: A Discussion
Quarterly Contribution to Support the Site (recommended)
JRNyquist.blog
$15.00
114 responses to “Lenin’s War”
Jeff, you are 100% right. The communists in our media are blaming Trump for yesterday’s assassination attempt. Jesse Kelly said on his radio show today that the communist Democrats and media have embraced a culture of assassination and they will not stop until he is dead. They have been calling for Trump to be eliminated and there are unbalanced individuals like Oswald and Routh who will do their best to make it happen. We must pray for Trump and his family. Thank you for another excellent essay.
Democrats have no other choice, but to get rid of Trump somehow. Imagine him coming to power and investigating the first assassination attempt against him and why certain decisions were made to decrease security measures. He could dig out some interesting stuff
Oswald was not a communist but an american intelligence asset.
@Arnoldf “For 15 years of my life at the top of the Soviet bloc intelligence community, I was involved in a world-wide disinformation effort aimed at diverting attention away from the KGB’s involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald. The Kennedy assassination conspiracy was born—and it never died,” says Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest ranking intelligence official ever to defect from the Soviet bloc. Pacepa wrote the book, Programmed to Kill: Lee Harvey Oswald, the Soviet KGB, and the Kennedy Assassination.
Excellent quote. Pacepa was right about this. There is a significant body of evidence that many observers prefer to ignore.
Jeff wrote, “One must never point out that the assassins of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy were communists”. He also reported on information that Castro was directly implicated in JFK’s assassination. Last I read Castro was a communist until his dying day. Further, he had help from the KGB. So we have evidence of a conspiracy, but not enough to identify those who actually pulled the triggers. So it’s true, that the assassins who killed JFK were communists.
As for RFK, I would not be surprised if Castro with KGB help was also involved with that assassination.
It is easy to fool a bereaved person, and tragic to play games with him.
You need to research that more carefully, with due awareness of the KGB.
REPLY to the following nonsense:
Oswald was not a communist but an american intelligence asset.
——–
The beneficiaries of JFK and RFK murders were Russian etc. communists, and Oswald was their asset, ideologically and no doubt logistically and in strategy execution as well.
They were not ready for WW3 back then (unlike now) and so they needed to get rid of the situation that Khrushchev created in Cuba, and so they got Castro involved and the rest if history.
Now the question is – WHY bring this history back to life NOW ? Why is it so important to these KGB assets to spread this deception NOW ?
It is the idea itself and to create the go-ahead signal to their American communist operatives, so that to start the civil war if they succeed in killing Trump, so they don’t need this comparison to the KGB involvement in assassinating JFK and RFK… not NOW.
It is the timing of it that’s important.
Of course both Biden and Kam-blabla are involved as any other true blue commies would be, through the proxies inside these various responsible agencies, penetrated long ago by communist agents.
Gen. Sejna’s Congressional testimony speak about communist infiltration of press, government and on and on and on…and today it is seen in life, that speech of his is priceless.
And in his book We will bury you when he speaks about the Moscow’s long-term plan, in regards to the US the assets would be ordered to create the policies of isolationism of the US towards Europe, and undermining NATO and so on, which is visible today in the deeds of these people known as RINOs, many of whom should be suspected of being the communist controlled opposition, as the Kremlin knows that without this there is no progress in the overall worldwide communist domination scheme…
They are even publishing these FBI provocations and human rights violations and so on, but without the essential truth that these are the communist agents within these agencies that are causing it…
Nothing more needs to be added – but this is why they are reviving these nonsensical conspiracy theories so that they can blame their anti-communist opposition for their own communist evils….it always works UNLESS the truth about these criminals is widespread and known.
BUT no matter how many more times Trump is under threat, he is not the overall solution to the communist tyranny problem, he has proven his inability to deal with the communist electoral fraud and gave them the keys to the WH instead.
Something evil is brewing, very evil, that’s why they want these conspiracy theories spread as much as possible.
Good points here.
The worst part in the second assassination of Trump is the deception level of shifting blame towards Ukraine. The assassin was chosen out of his possible backgrounds related to Ukraine. Now, the global conservatives and Trumpists are enraged to support the anti-Ukraine cause. The Russian communists use this ploy to justify their genocide of Ukrainian people. We can’t underestimate the complex deception of communists.
Sadly, Cliff Kincaid’s recent podcast on Rumble(Cliff has been in interviews with Mr. Nyquist) is leaning toward Ukraine’s involvement in Trump’s second assassination attempt. It’s unbelievable! Cliff makes the leap that he must be in Ukraine’s pocket because the assassin was in and out of Ukraine, sponsored mercenaries, and had the money to travel. Trump’s rhetoric about ending the war immediately once in office and his objection to long-range missiles is what Kincaid concludes is behind Ukraine’s involvement in using this lunatic as Trump’s assassin. Speculation on steroids!!
This would-be assassin is not terribly bright and is the perfect product of communist active measures. He is so disoriented, he fails to realize that this favorite politicians ARE on the communist side of the spectrum along with Mr. Putin. The advantage of confusing the battle lines is very apparent. If he ever was in touch with the SBU, readers should know that there are still communists hidden in the ranks of the SBU. There has been great disappointment in the SBU during this war, and there has been talk behind the scenes of disbanding it because of the old KGB holdovers. Who do you trust in such an institution? The complexities of the Ukraine situation, however, are lost on most Americans who see no complexities at all.
Really interesting, given that, as I am strongly convinced, the return of Donald is coming (through elections, but without any importance of the number of voters for him) after which he will actually increase much more “pressure on Russia”, maybe “impose an ultimatum on them, which they will reject” and as a result the situation will develop much more seriously, which may also look like a real, big war between the Eastern and Western blocs. In a nutshell: Trump must start the war (and possibly the wars, along with the expectations of the Middle East). So, in my opinion, we will witness a “great reversal” in the beliefs of these global conservatives and Trumpists that you are talking about regarding Russia: it will now turn from “innocently pressed by the Democrats” into an enemy that we must deal with “together, as a united nation.”
And this will be another such reversal from one extreme to its opposite. Which further reinforces the Faith (in Donald as the personification of the conservative cause against the liberal democrats). It is “no matter how the narrative changes, even to its opposite, you continue to believe the source.” Effective collective mind control over a target group.
At least my modest analysis, also based and on numerous Russian sources, shows this. (But I, due to the same analysis, also have a special opinion about the entire war in Ukraine.) We’ll see what happens.
There is the danger that Russia and China will escalate and attempt to break the deadlock, exploiting their strategic advantages because their conventional operations are so inferior. They have their hooks in our government, and EMP/nuclear attacks are possible. Before that, terrorism and assassination will be used. Can they allow Trump to be elected? I wonder if they allow that. Or even risk it. Everything depends on whether the Chinese think they can extend their military buildup for another six to eight years. If they can, they can afford to wait. If their economy is going to crack up, they cannot afford to wait.
@collective minds Trevor Loudon and Johnny Anderson did a great podcast together. Among other things, it was about the last US-election, which the Chinese orchestrated with a lot of money and people so that Biden ultimately won. Absolutely worth listening to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4P3meQoZsQ I assume that the Chinese will repeat this staging. However, if the Chinese feel strong enough for a possible military conflict with the USA, Trump could actually be assassinated. (The US would be destabilized internally and the chaos could be used to take over Taiwan)
Jeff, you raise an important question, can the CCP and Putin wait? If Trump escapes all assassination attempts and is looking like a landslide getting into office, Xi and Putin will be looking not just at four years holding them back in their plans, but likely another two to three years, at least, for them to recover their momentum, assuming one of their puppets replaces Trump. Can they afford that lost time? Add to that, both countries have falling populations. Then the corruption in both countries is holding their economies back, in Russia’s case also the cost of the war, the people are getting restless. In China Evergrand is only the tip of the iceberg of the failing economy. Can they afford to wait?
I just got back from a conference in Canada. Met some generals. Learned a lot. It’s all on a knife’s edge and difficult to make any definitive statements. One thing is true. The generals are more worried about a Russia right now. Russia can hurt North America.
Jeff, I just listened to your incredible interview on “Examining the Big Deception: A Discussion.” Wow. Informative, scary, and depressing, but knowledge we need.
One thing: I was very surprised by your comments about David Horowitz and the secretary who got killed. Are you saying that Horowitz is not a true conservative?
Sorting out the wheat from the chaff on the conservative side is really hard. And then we have Islam experts like Robert Spencer, etc, who ally with Horowitz. Spencer and Raymond Ibrahim seem to be straight arrows.
The book regarding Hitler’s homosexuality is by Lothar Machtan: Hitlers Geheimnis: Das Doppelleben eines Diktators (english: Hitler’s Secret: The Double Life of a Dictator)
HELLO EVERYBODY. OFF-TOPIC BUT IMPORTANT NEWS: ISRAEL HAS APPARENTLY PULLED OFF ONE OF THE GREATEST COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE/COUNTER-TERRORSIM OPERATION EVER IN THE LAST SEVERAL HOURS (BUT MOST LKELY WILL LEAD TO ALL HELL BREAKING LOOSE IN THE MIDDLE EAST):
‘More than a thousand’ Hezbollah fighters wounded in Lebanon after their pagers explode…
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/dozens-hezbollah-members-wounded-lebanon-when-pagers-exploded-sources-witnesses-2024-09-17/
Unprecedented event…
https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/hundreds-of-hezbollah-operatives-pagers-explode-in-apparent-attack-across-lebanon-cf31cad4
‘Hacked by Israel’…
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/30487383/hezbollah-fighters-injured-walkie-talkies-explode/
VIDEO…
https://x.com/yashar/status/1836038437264368078
Iranian Ambassador injured…
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-820547#google_vignette
UPDATES…
https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/lebanon-pagers-attack-hezbollah/index.html
Some inside information, no confirmation; but I was just told the Iranian Ambassador was killed in this incident. Let’s see if my source proves right.
I have a feeling the physical effect was like this, but even worse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUAnN-FXcdE&ab_channel=MattGFX77
Kaboom.
😆
@WADE QUEEN Whoever is behind it, it has just been proven worldwide that digital technology not only enables surveillance, but can also be used as an energy weapon that can potentially kill. If this is possible with pagers and walkie-talkies, then it is no problem use any smart technology, Bluetooth, even simple laptops in this way. We should also think about this.
Also, Jeff, about your comments about conservative groups like Turning Point and others. And then people like MacGregor. It seems reasonable to say that some individuals and groups are at best naïve about communists and at worst in bed with them.
Did you see something specifically wrong with Turning Point, or was it just a matter of not enough attention paid to communism?
It’s also disconcerting to see so many videos and speakers on the conservative side alleging “secret knowledge” that Trump is secretly winning with the military’s help and and even that Trump and Putin and Xi are working together to take down communism. Those types use the word “normies” to describe people who don’t know the deep secrets of how freedom is progressing. To me it seems like fables constructed by communists to distract conservatives.
Peter: Good observation. Yes, Turning Point seems a bit off target and a bit too mercenary in its aggressive marketing and image-building. Show us something real and substantial, then we can feel confident in you. Don’t tell us how wonderful you are over and over while ignoring the core issue. And Peter, you noted something about this word “normie” that I’ve often worried about. The first time I heard this word, it was coming from neo-Nazis. It’s a funny way of talking that embraces extremist thinking. Is there really something wrong with “normal”? By making “normal” into “normie” a kind of mockery is being unleashed.
“normie” in online argot is a shorthand for “useful idiot” applied more broadly to the class of legacy media consumers, “non-cognoscenti” or the otherwise functionally illiterate. It’s become a commonplace expression, but may have echoes of “bourgeois” in perjorative usage.
Yes. It is pejorative. And the person using it is assumed to know the real score.
Thanks, Jeff. Yes, “normie” is a very strange word, and grossly separates conservatives to no good end. But… I wanted to go back to my first post, above, in which I wrote:
“One thing: I was very surprised by your comments about David Horowitz and the secretary who got killed. Are you saying that Horowitz is not a true conservative?
Sorting out the wheat from the chaff on the conservative side is really hard. And then we have Islam experts like Robert Spencer, etc, who ally with Horowitz. Spencer and Raymond Ibrahim seem to be straight arrows.”
What are your thoughts about Horowitz, Glazov, Spencer, Ibrahim, and others like them, that present what seems like deadly serious material about Marxism and Islam that we should pay attention to?
I do not have anything against Jamie Glazov, Spencer or Ibrahim. Horowitz is a curiosity, on the other hand. I read his book, “Radical Son,” when it came out, and I wondered to myself, “Why is this guy a conservative?” Something was off about his perspective. Later, when he attacked Diana West, and destroyed her career, I spent a lot of time watching him, studying his past, and I found some things that really bothered me. I do not trust him, if that is what you are asking. I cannot get inside his head, so I do not know what he believes. His story about becoming a conservative, however, seems to be an invention. And Betty van Patter’s daughter accused him of lying about it in her San Francisco Chonicle letter. He probably would say that these are typical communist attacks against a turncoat. But with his attack on Diana West, his acknowledgement of “Blacklisted by History” and compliments to its author, Stan Evans, that he changed his views on McCarthy’s name, then to go back against McCarthy, and against Diana West for taking up McCarthy’s position, was a rotten show of hypocrisy. Either you are an anticommunist or you are not. Horowitz did not dare go up against Stan Evans while he was alive, or challenge his scholarship. But he could go against Diana West and with his buddies, destroy her in the same style as his predecessors destroyed McCarthy — with that same anti-anticommunism that is used against all anticommunists. I think that people who served communism, and were buddies with the Black Panthers, should not be so easily forgiven and allowed to be conservative leaders. To have been what he was during the first half of his life, there had to be something wrong with him. Why would that something be fixed later on? I have no good reason to think he is a good person.
The first time I heard normie, it was used by an overweight leftist engineering professor to refer to people who use the things engineers design without knowing anything about those things.
The second time, it was used by an overweight Jew-hating guy who spends way too much time online, to describe people who don’t spend enough time online, and therefore don’t understand internet humor or hate Jews enough.
I’m convinced this word is for idiots and I do not use it. I automatically have a lower opinion of those who do.
@Peter Falkenberg Brown
People like MacGregor, while they don’t seem overly intelligent to me, also don’t seem so naive to me that they don’t realize that they’re just repeating the viewpoints and the ever-changing lines of the Kremlin’s narrative. He and everyone else (really everyone) do exactly that, and the minor differences between their stories are due to the fact that they are addressed to different target groups.
Concerning: “It’s also disconcerting to see so many videos and speakers on the conservative side alleging “secret knowledge” that Trump is secretly winning with the military’s help and and even that Trump and Putin and Xi are working together to take down communism.”
Realistically, Putin (and Xi, but he has not yet challenged the West into a hot war, so he has not been brought to the level of Putin’s image), in the minds of a serious part of conservative people, embodies the powerful archetype of the “fighter against the vision of a future of liberal madness” regarding at least one fundamental and extremely critical problem for conservatives, such as this “a future in which our children and grandchildren (of the United States) can choose their sex”, between 130 or more “genders”.
So, without a doubt, as can be clearly seen in the minds of a very serious part of conservatives, Putin is definitely part of this “life-and-death struggle for a future different from the crazy liberal vision” that Trump personifies. From 2020, with the “stolen election,” conservatives’ anxiety about a bleak liberal future grew, until 2022, when “Putin stood up to the liberal cabal, the deep state,” etc., and he even “banned the spread of LGBT propaganda, as well as limited gender reassignment to medical emergencies.” Isn’t it a conservative dream? So since 2022 we have an ever-increasing return of conservative hopes through the ongoing warm-up band concert for the return of the American savior.
The physical future of the children and grandchildren, of the nation. Point. With this as a cannonball in the center of the stretched canvas, when the same conservative audience received information that Putin was building a neo-communist digital Gulag with all-seeing digital identifiers, deanonymization and growing biometrics – which started powerfully during covid, but especially intensified after Ukraine – but this was presented to them, by the same conservative thought leaders, as “Putin’s counter-defensive strike against American proxy aggression and sanctions; for the protection of the interests of the Russian nation”, then it is so. When they find out that Putin has ordered the mass introduction of the digital ruble, but this is presented to them as an act to protect the ruble, “a new financial instrument to avoid another theft of Russian money” and whatever, then the same CBDC that conservative people are horrified of and call it an instrument for enslaving the people of America, becomes a good and a tool for protecting the Russian people.
Imagine, on this basis, if Trump returned and “pacified or even stopped the unbridled liberal order,” what things could be received much more calmly by conservative audiences.
However, as I said in my answer above, I expect in the near future these different types of “fighters against the liberal vision” (which is “fighters for a better future”) to fight each other in a hotter war. We know what things that cannot happen in peacetime can be applied in wartime. We can make assumptions about the future, taking into account current global trends. (Just a guess; I don’t work for intelligence and I don’t know.)
So, these stubborn claims, about “secret knowledge” that Trump is secretly winning with the military’s help, if Trump actually returns, in my opinion, have every chance of becoming the dominant (maybe pre-war) narrative. And if Trump pacifies part of the liberal agenda, the deepening of community cohesion is in sight.
In this regard, it was extremely impressive to me how it happened that the visit of the top conservative journalist Tucker to Moscow (which actually happened about a week after the announcement of a remarkable achievement of Donald’s constant conservative companion in his “fight against liberals”, Musk) just preceded a huge event in the field of future technologies in Russia. And his interview itself (on February 6) exactly coincided with the announcement of the program of this event.
Which technology?
The words of the Russian thinker and writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky, who made the following statement about socialism, come to mind: “The future empire of socialism will be a terrible tyranny of criminals and murderers. It will plunge humanity into a veritable hell of spiritual suffering and poverty.”
Besides Sun-Tzu and Clausewitz, I still need to classify the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, who is considered to be the namesake of the Fabian Society. The organization that was founded in the year of Marx’s death as The Fellowship of the New Life and was renamed the Fabian Society a few months later. The turtle, the international symbol of Fabian socialism, and the wolf in sheep’s clothing in the coat of arms are and were the unmistakable signs of their approach to transforming society. Lenin was part of this group during his time in London, was enthusiastic about the married couple Sidney and Beatrice Webb, and translated some of their books into Russian. The Fabian Society’s founding members included all forms of today’s communist subgroups, such as Havelock Ellis (sexologist), Edith Lees Ellis (women’s rights activist), Henry Steven Salt (animal rights activist and vegetarian). Tussy Marx was there, as were Emmeline Pankhurst and Annie Besant.
The Webbs ‘vacationed’ in Ukraine during the Holodomor and were amazed by the blooming landscapes.
The fabian Bernhard Shaw: Under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble you might possibly be
excecuted in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.
It was also Shaw who met Stalin in Russia in 1930 and enthusiastically declared (roughly): If you call this communism, then from now on I am a communist.
The Fabian Society presents itself to the outside world as an organization that acts for the good of humanity. On closer inspection, however, it quickly becomes apparent that its main aim is to strengthen power structures. In the interests of security over freedom, people are to be increasingly restricted. The Fabians’ goal is to bring all people into line at the expense of individuality.
Global socialism requires global equality among the population, which inevitably leads to the loss of national identity. To achieve this, peoples are to be abolished and nations are to serve only as economic areas.
How should I place the Fabian Society in the communist framework?
Dostoyevsky was prescient in many of his statements about socialism. The Fabians admired Stalin and did real damage to Britain. These are co-religionists of the communists. They are enthusiasts for collectivism, dupes and fellow-travelers. They are on that political slippery slope, always to be out-done and used by those further to the left.
“and Annie Besant.” of Theosophical Society leadership fame.? Small world. Socialisms have been prolific vehicles of depopulation and retardation of technological and industrial growth. The heirs of Malthus – like Kissinger’s protege Schwab – and their fixed ideas have continually monstrous consequences.
There is overlap between theosophists and socialists. One finds this in the National Socialists movement, and even among a few Russian Bolsheviks — like the ones who designed Lenin’s tomb, if memory serves.
@Calvin At the beginning of the 20th century, Ida Hoffmann and Henry Oedenkoven brought together the who’s who of (socialist) intellectuals and bohemian celebrities, the hippies of the fin-de-sièc – the Monteveritans were born (Monte Verita, Ascona, Switzerland). Lenin is said to have danced naked around the campfire, as did Steiner. Kafka was there, the Huxleys, many other Fabians… Blavatsky’s teachings were an absolute must, the Aryan as a racial type was desirable. The father of “repressive tolerance” (the tendency to tolerate the unimportant so that the essential is not discussed) Herbert Marcuse also took part in the goings-on there, was the philosopher father of the 1968 generation and the Green Party would have had no program without him.
J. Edgar Hoover wrote in his book about the threat of communism that Lenin in early 1900s had the communists organize a string of bank robberies in Western Europe, to finance the Bolshevik revolution.
Hoover even spoke about police files he obtained from related western European law enforcement agencies on this subject.
When there was a Socialist Congress in Europe, this scandal was to be brought up, and voted on to condemn it, but Lenin had already so much influence and communist agents within the Socialist Party that he had them drop the issue altogether.
Communist Party is nothing less than diabolically driven atheistic criminal Mafia, with which, this Synagogue of Satan, nothing works but strict force of justice and eliminating their influence completely.
But today they are so far ahead that this seems nearly impossible to avert, but at the end this Mafia will be brought to justice regardless.
The infiltration has become a severe problem — threatening to destroy the West. In fact, much destruction has already happened and may already be fatal to the existing order.
Of interest: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/09/17/putin-orders-russian-army-to-add-180000-troops-which-would-make-it-second-biggest-after-china/
There is a little bit of problem with the opinion about the Israeli Mosad being involved in the pager explosions, at least this following conspiracy theory (which is solely what it is), may cause some opinion to the contrary to arise :-))
But what if Mosad was not behind it, but that it was Russian GRU provocation, to stir up the waters, to create psychological warfare effect and to elevate the Islamic hatred for Israel to higher levels, and Russian communists don’t mind getting rid of fanatics they cannot fully control or who are self-governed and do not fully follow orders.
The reason why this opinion comes about is because of the chain of supply of such pagers, which doesn’t exclude China as well, because they may be made in China after all, which would be a special circumstance and highly risky operation, but with tremendous benefit to the communist cause, because the damage done to Hezbollah can be now attributed to the already much hated Israel (and it was probably Mosad behind it, but it is not confirmed yet), so that it would serve as sort of “pick a fight” provocation – it is truly a conspiracy theory and perhaps a bad one, but one has to realize how difficult it would be for Mosad to find a supply channel by which such altered explosive pagers would be delivered to the enemy.
On the other hand the CCP and GRU are the bosses of Iran and Hezbollah, which makes it absolutely easy for them to supply such pagers and blame it on Israel at the same time by the ever present Russian KGB propaganda machine.
It is just a thought and probably an erroneous one.
@Concerned: I think this is very likely. Russian communists have tremendous hold over Israel. The country of Israel is the only one to allow Russian citizens traveling without a visa. The level of compromise must be very deep.
It’s very complicated and difficult to generalize about Israel in that way.
About the question of Russian potential hold over Israel – that seems to be little bit far fetched, and the question of Visa or not Visa to travel into Israel – this is probably because of the communist persecution of the Jews in USSR that Israel made that step, whether it is a wise one, that remains to be seen, and most likely not a very wise one at that…as anybody who comes from Russia as an “defector” or “emigrant” should be scrutinized to the fullest extent whether that is not a KGB asset or spy…which the KGB has a special method how to deal with this issue also… (a blackmail recruitment after the person is inside the target country…so the asset is not recruited before, but after the person leaves Russia…) – it is a serious problem and Israel should re-evaluate this policy seriously.
15% of the Levant are Soviet Union expatriot Russian speakers. Despite the domestic press vociferously denouncing when sensitive technology and hardware is surreptitiously sold to Moscow & Beijing, things like this – and October 7th – consistently keep happening. Soviets had a bad habit of posing as them to gain confidence; the more things change comrade …
Exactly. Israel has habitually sold Western technologies for Russia and China with impunity. I try my hardest to not suspecting Israel but they have been the most sus people ever.
Every Western country sells things to the communists that they should not. Israel is not unique in this.
In the MciLvenna quote, should it be America?
They “left it” at Bahrain AFB for the Taliban to pick up…another theory…
But seriously, it is almost as when the KGB used the Elders of Zion letters to deceive these fanatic infidels. But they are today mostly communist infidels, perverted by long years of indoctrination, but with the careful admixture of “Allah” into it, but very careful…
I’m think this Bagram air base. This phone changes things.
That is what he said. Why shouldn’t it be about America?
No, it shouldn’t be anybody as peace is always preferred before war.
Not knowing the details, and all these speculations floating around, it was just a speculation who was behind it, never an accusation.
But to fight the terrorists, who in many ways are the militant communist militias (there is a picture of these Hamas and Hezbollah fighters all raising the communist clenched fist in that UK Sun article about this issue), so no, it shouldn’t be anywhere that such devices explode and kill or seriously injure people, but in case of these fanatics and the warfare that needs to be done against them, it is probably something that will raise their attention to the fact that their causes are evil and absolutely unjust and that they need to stop them and leave all in peace – a thing that they most likely will not do as their Moscow bosses will not let them and their fanatical cause will continue.
And yes, in case of Israel it is a self-defense, and a very sophisticated one and morally just.
I think the ference was to a simple typo: “American” for “America.”
Jeff I looked at the American Freedom Alliance channels on various platforms and found the event and other speakers but could not find your talk. Can you provide a link?
Yes, please!
The Milwaukee event has not been posted yet. Their other conferences were held in other cities. Different speech topics.
Many people including conservatives believe that the Zapruder film proves that there was more than 1 shooter and bullet used in the JFK assassination. I know that the book “Case Closed” deals with this. What other good resources debunk this theory?
I have written about this in detail, with links to resources and books for study. You might read the defector Ion Pacepa’s book on Oswald, “Programmed to Kill,” or watch the German documentary on the Cuban involvement with Oswald as well. I site several books in my article. I do not have time to rewrite all of it.
Jeff, you have written about it extensively, and I have rebutted you. There is one piece of evidence which you have not disproven, and that is the physical evidence. As a science trained person, I look at the physical evidence first. I have yet to see any physical evidence, either direct and/or recreation, that backs up the conspiracy theory that a lone shooter from behind killed Kennedy. 0% of the physical evidence backs up that theory. 100% of the physical evidences that I have seen back up the account that a second shooter from in front dealt the fatal shot. Those evidences include those to which you have linked.
Don’t get started on the numerous rabbit holes of conspiracy theories. I don’t go there.
The German documentary is what finally gave me answers as to who did it and why. The physical evidences alone don’t give those answers. The documentary doesn’t give all the answers, but enough to show that communists were behind and ordered the assassination.
That’s all I have to say here.
RO: You are doing this backwards. I can see no persuasive evidence of a second shooter. There is nothing to disprove. No bullet hole fragment was found from a second rifle and shooter. No reliable witness saw a second shooter. There is no acoustic evidence because that presented to the House was ultimately found to be from a motorcycle nowhere near the shooting (this finding made after the House investigation concluded there was a second shooter based on this false evidence). We must avoid false information and bad analysis. Too many people speculate about things are not true. When I rebut one invention, conspiracy theorists can propagate three more cause claims. It is exhausting. On your side you ignore my rebuttals or dismiss me out of hand. How can we have a productive discussion with you when you will not discuss the real points? I presented detailed analysis here and links. You failed to engage with me on that level, but avoided details. The evidence you claim, and the analysis you offer, is counter-factual. You have not really studied the evidence, but simply accuse the Warren Commission of dishonesty. It made a few mistakes, and a few details were glossed over, but when you look into their mistakes you find that the correction of those mistakes only serves to confirm Oswald’s guilt. The House investigation in the 1970s based its verdict on information that was soon falsified, so that we can see the whole of both investigations tell the same story. Oswald shot JFK. The investigators are not a cabal plotting against the American people. Why would they do this? What possible motive, and why wouldn’t some of them speak up and blow the whistle? The conspiracy theory becomes more and more ludicrous the more people you place in the category of “conspirator.”
Jeff: in the future, if this argument about the Kennedy assassinations comes up again, wouldn’t it be better merely to say that while there is disagreement about the details, the central theme uncovered by the German Documentary is that it was an operation of the combined Cuban/KGB? Therefore you don’t want to get bogged down in the details?
No way are you able to persuade me that the Warren Report and its derivatives (e.g. Posner’s “Case Closed”) is accurate, and you are persuaded by the identities of those who support the Warren Report. We come to the question from completely different angles. What we can agree on is that it was a communist action. Therefore wouldn’t it be better merely to say, “This issue has been discussed ad nauseam and I will not have it discussed further on my blog.” then point to the German Documentary exposing the communist background?
I just ask you to carefully read Posner’s book with an open mind. You will find most of your beliefs challenged by careful arguments and facts.
There you go again, trying to convince me. I have no idea who is this Posner, it’s irrelevant anyways. His conclusion is that Oswald was the sole gunman. In order for me to believe that, I have to accept physical impossibilities, ignore physical evidence, not listen to credible witnesses, … the conclusion is not believable. Please, let’s not argue details.
Please, focus on the important things where all of us can agree: Who ordered it? Castro. Who helped him? KGB. Was Oswald innocent? The evidence shows he was not, but I don’t know what was his role.
Let’s focus that this was a communist conspiracy, part of a larger conspiracy that threatens to destroy us.
QUOTE :
Many people including conservatives believe that the Zapruder film proves that there was more than 1 shooter and bullet used in the JFK assassination. I know that the book “Case Closed” deals with this. What other good resources debunk this theory?
——–
The beneficiaries of the assassination are the KGB Kremlin Mafia, and back then it was all about the Cuba crisis which Moscow created and on purpose.
So even IF there was another shooter, he would still be a communist one, perhaps as a backup, so these theories about it don’t make sense and are designed by Moscow to sway the KGB guilt elsewhere (i.e. CIA – which, btw, back then was still anti-communist).
There are much more pressing matters now than this question of long ago history which none can amend and the only beneficiaries of these fabricated theories why it wasn’t Oswald or him alone (as KGB asset) is the Russian communist propaganda machine.
Leave it alone and use facts that are facts and not made up (communist) fabricated nonsense – echoed by perhaps honest people who are being deceived and are able to blame their own government for killing their own president instead of looking at the KGB Mafia and Castro as the true culprits.
There was not another shooter at Dallas, though people have twisted the evidence and misunderstood the evidence, in order to construct scenarios for other shooters. There is NO EVIDENCE of a second shooter in the Kennedy assassination. Do not read half the evidence. Do not read some half-baked thing that leaves the important details out of it. It was Oswald and Oswald alone. Nobody on the Warren Commission had a reason to cover up anything. The FBI had its own embarrassment to look after, as did the CIA. But embarrassment about bungling is not proof of guilt. This is the most investigated assassination in history. You have to know the record of that investigation in careful detail, and the character of Oswald and Ruby. Commenting after you have only read some conspiracy theorist is not the way to open a discussion. But this is how everyone does it. There is an emotion need to believe in a conspiracy. There is a paranoia inside of people that craves this kind of perspectivism.
To add – no, it has never looked like there was another shooter and this because the KGB would not risk another security risk or breach of security as it was already risky with Oswald him in his state of mind to be involved. So they wouldn’t risk involving another person besides Oswald, so that it would look like a spontaneous individual act of evil and not something more coordinated which then would point at the Kremlin directly and perhaps began the WW3 then – which they were not willing nor ready to risk.
But again – why to bring it up now unless it serves evil purpose of misleading or diverting attention etc. ?
Exactly.
JEFF: Iranian State Media has reported that Iran’s Ambassador to Lebanon, Mojtaba Amani suffered “Extremely Serious Injuries” to his Eyes leaving him almost Completely Blind, as a result of today’s Pager Attack by Israel.
Yes, I know what is reported on the ambassador. Let’s see if the report changes during the next couple of days. Not sure if my source is right or not. Will be a test.
Lebanon’s health ministry updates the death toll in the pager explosions to 11.
Another 4,000 are wounded, including 400 in critical condition, according to ministry numbers cited by Arabic-language media
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/lebanese-authorities-raise-death-toll-in-pager-blasts-to-11-say-4000-injured/
Just reported
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/mossad-planted-bombs-5000-hezbollah-pagers-months-before/
The Hoft outfit:
Far-left New York Times reported that the pagers, AR-924 model, were ordered from Taiwanese manufacturer Gold Apollo and had been tampered with before reaching Hezbollah’s hands.
Explosive material was implanted next to the battery of each pager, enabling remote detonation. At precisely 3:30 p.m., the devices received a message that appeared to be from Hezbollah’s leadership. Instead, the message triggered an explosion.
According to officials who spoke to NYT, the devices were programmed to beep for several seconds before exploding.
Gold Apollo founder Hsu Ching-Kuang stated that the pagers involved in the explosion were manufactured by a European company that had the rights to use Gold Apollo’s brand, though he could not immediately recall the company’s name.
“The product was not ours. It was only that it had our brand on it,” Hsu told reporters in Taiwan. In a separate statement, the company identified the manufacturer as BAC.
“We authorize BAC to use our brand trademark for product sales in specific regions, but the design and manufacturing of the products are entirely handled by BAC,” the statement said.
———–
So this doesn’t solve anything and where is the conclusive proof it was Mosad ? It is just an accusation and there is no proof who it was in reality, it could have been intercepted by anybody…including the communists from the KGB (through proxy perhaps – EU proxy).
This doesn’t mean it wasn’t Mosad, it is just not conclusive and perhaps never will be.
@CONCERNED BAC is a consulting company in Hungary that does not produce anything, but only markets it. The managing director, Cristiana Barsony-Arcidiacono, is also an employee of the ominous Eden Global Impact Group, which in turn promotes a project to build a futuristic and sustainable city in Mexico. It looks more like the two companies mentioned are shell companies.
Since I see Orban as a Russian stooge who publicly transformed himself from an anti-Semite to Netanyahu’s best EU friend after Hamas’ October attack on Israel, I am not convinced that Mossad/Israel were behind the pager attack.
This is the mark of sophisticated intelligence (military) operation, always some kind of dead end and nothing concrete, which means professionals at work.
So the speculation is almost useless, but not entirely.
But this is not a question who in fact produced the pagers but where they were altered with the explosives and detonator, which are both highly sophisticated as it looks like and so these were no amateurs who did it – and to blame it on Mosad, even though that is still a possibility, is not conclusive.
CCP, GRU both had a chance to do this and sway the blame on Mosad…i.e. Israel, which Moscow hates and wants destroyed.
So since the company is from Hungary, that would suggest the GRU possibility, and exactly for that reason – to gear up the “Islamic terrorism” act and blame everything which may happen in the future on this same “Islamic terrorist retaliation” and point at Israel as the guilty party that may have triggered this kind of terrorist response by these explosive pagers – in that case that would make sense why Moscow would be involved in something like this – and to add, there are still plenty of communist fanatics in Eastern Europe, including Hungary, and their intel services are 1st class…including the military hardware and so on.
This situation with Hezbollah may be more important than one would think, a trigger for Islamic communist attacks not only against Israel but most importantly against the US – via the assets the KGB asset Biden etc. allowed into the country so far.
This is just an opinion, nothing else.
Thanks, Jeff, for your reply above about Horowitz. I wasn’t able to reply under your comment. I think many people who believe in Horowitz (as I have done) don’t have your depth of knowledge about the issues you raised (e.g. Diana West, etc.). That’s very unfortunate.
At the same time, he seems to be publishing material of value. What do you make of that?
Thanks!
I look at his material and find it a curious mix of good and bad advice, flattery and genuine concern. He is making a living. He must appear credible to conservatives. Yet he attacks valuable anticommunist insights. Was Diana West’s book so bad, so wrong, as to deserve this?
Jeff, Does your impression of David Horowitz also apply to Richard Poe? He is the one who, so to speak, introduced me to David Horowitz.
I know nothing about Poe.
Thank you, Jeff!
How disinformation and enemies agents can be neutralized without resorting to authoritarian measures such as banning books, publications, parties and seizing their property or freedom of speech? It seems they feel like they have the right to speak whereas on their domains they can persecute, forbid speeches, and hunt political opponents.
It’s an asymmetric war. It is like muslims that can go to historical christian countries and brag about Islam at will, but christians cannot go preach in Muslim territories.
How are we supposed to fight amoral/imoral enemies by giving them the benefit of unilateral moral limits?
Speaking of typos: I think the ference was to a simple typo: “American” for “America.”
“ference” should be “reference.” I think Jeff’s sharp readers figured it out.
Thank you for another great article, and really appreciated the discussion podcast. You and others (Trevor and Jimmy) have spoken with him before, I see. So more clarifying listening opportunities.
https://open.spotify.com/show/5O7ATDlTsKtnCKSUwrCYs4
There is another angle to the possibility (still a conspiracy theory) about the GRU provocation with the pagers and now phones exploding…and this is the potential of new recruitment of terrorists when they see so many injured and the possible KGB propaganda pointing to Mosad as the ultimate force behind this attack…and this is to play on the fanaticism of such people over there, because when they hear Israel and Mosad they see red blood immediately.
That would be the additional reason why this whole thing is so suspicious. Of course Mosad wouldn’t think about this kind of detail and rather propose to scare them off with force, but the GRU/KGB planning might be different, and their terrorism recruitment for ops in the US be most likely part of it.
It is just a theory, but one is suspecting that these points could have some value – perhaps.
Off-topic, but of interest: https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2024/09/18/harris-tosses-fresh-word-salad-and-its-tasty-n4932643
Robert Spencer’s very witty take on Kamala Harris’s public speaking skills, or lack of them.
“I just love yellow school buses.”
Remember, they have to be inefficient electric buses that catch on fire easily.
Also, my favorite ‘Kamala-ism’ (so far) is her expounding on ‘the significance of the passage of time’–a classic! 🙂
How timely!
Hello Mister Nyquist, i saw a very interesting video about Angela Merkel. A man wrote a Biography about her and he stated that her Grandfather was working for the Soviets (something which i completly ignored) and that her father, who was an evangelical pastor, had the task to infiltrate che evangelical churches in the DDR (which is very interesting thinking about Desinformation by Pacepa). For all the german speakers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1zgViK384w
PS next time i will post a question about central banks and how they have been infiltrated. I found some very interesting facts
@Giacomo This part of the biography about Angela Merkel and her father and grandfather are correct.
@birgit i don’t agree with everything the autor was saying, neverthless it’s interesting that he remarked the soviet connections of Angela Merkel and that so many people in Germany, who actually do not know Golitsyn, saw the video. Perhaps more people will wake up!
Communism, as a religion, tends to run in families.
Giacomo. Yes, you are exactly right. Pacepa goes into the infiltration of the Protestant churches, and the DDR (East Germany) played an important role. When West Germany swallowed East Germany, it took a red bath.
I have to disagree, Jeff. The GDR swallowed West Germany and then the entire western EU. A look back at the pastors who led the staged, peaceful revolution is necessary. Let us not forget that with the communist Merkel, the communist Gauck also came to power after he was king and emperor of the Stasi files. Perhaps someone will take a look at Poland now… the male Merkel is currently in power there.
@Giacomo In 1992, we started the investigation in West Germany – we focused on Gysi, Wagenknecht, de Maiziere (he was responsible with Merkel’s father for the destruction of the church in Berlin-Brandenburg and at the same time sat for the SED in the East CDU). Gysi was convicted in 1998 as an unofficial collaborator of the State Security; the then President of the Bundestag, Rita Süssmuth (CDU), ensured that he was the only person convicted who did not have to resign his seat in the Bundestag. When Kohl brought Merkel into his cabinet and began referring to her as his girl, it was clear to all GDR citizens that Father Stalin had returned. Merkel was Putin’s willing puppet. I translated Golitsyn into German and distributed it to anyone and everyone. Nobody in West Germany is interested in it; they all love Putin.
One of the most famous civil rights activists during the GDR era was Vera Lengsfeld. For German speakers – two interesting videos of her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tm3atvTm-A and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlrSsBRK5j0&t=910s.
Knowing all this, it is not difficult to see that Merkel has been replaced by Wagenknecht. And the book “The Chancellor Who Came in from the Cold” definitely contributes to this.
If you look at a map of religious preferences in modern Germany, the former West Germany is geographically split between Catholic and Protestant areas, with a few urban areas having a plurality of nonbelievers. The former East Germany shows nonbelievers as the largest group through almost all the former DDR territory. This territory had been predominantly Protestant until 1945. Pastors like Horst Kasner, Angela Merkel’s father, were permitted to hold religious offices because they were cooperative with the Communist authorities. The East German Stasi infiltrated the churches and had a highly sophisticated “church department” that for four decades used a network of Christian pastors and theology professors as informants. There is a book, God’s Spies, by Elisabeth Braw, that provides information about this period. Combined with two generations subject to pervasive propaganda and the submissive position of the clergy, it is no wonder that the East Germans have abandoned even a nominal acknowledgement of religion.
The DDR did not use the brutal tactics of the Bolsheviks or the Chinese Communists but rather co-opted the church to become in effect an arm of the secret police. The question arises in our American situation, if the Deep State (not the best term, but the Federal governments and many state governments are deeply infiltrated by Marxists) will use the mainstream Catholic Church, the old line Protestant denominations, and the “progressive” wing of the evangelical churches in a similar manner if they are able to consolidate their hold on political power.
I think the infiltration and changing of the churches had long been underway in America. You cannot escape political correctness or related manifestations almost anywhere you go.
Nick Howard: Don’t believe that map of religious preferences—already many years ago when I lived in Germany, the vast majority of “religious” Germans were only nominally Catholic or Protestant. They were de facto non-Christians. The same is true of the clergy in the state churches. This was already largely true in Germany as early as 1900 which is one of the factors that helped the Nazis come to power, and the Reds today.
Martin Armstrong hammering this home to the Republicans every-single-day.
“It is no different from the Chinese, who still called their party the Communist Party when communism fell in 1989, and the people have private ownership today. Communism means there is no private ownership. They no more live in a Communist States than we live in a Democracy. China has more BILLIONAIRES than Europe and is only second to the United States.
At least in China, it is understandable why they did not change the party’s name. They would have had to remove Mao’s image everywhere, even from the currency. The Russians toppled the states of Lenin everywhere, and Putin even said Lenin was just a Bolsevick and not a great statement.
So if China pretends it’s Communist so they do not have to say Mao was wrong, unlike the Russians, then I suppose here in Europe and America, we can pretend to be a Democracy when we are not. Democracy means we, the people, vote, but we are never asked to vote on anything. Nobody asks, shall we go to war with Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran all simultaneously raise your hand? Even more strangely, it appears Russia is the only one not pretending. They admit that they are a republic, so those elected make decisions.”
CMA: Your post contains a major misunderstanding. No ruling communist party has ever established for itself a communist economy or social system. This has always been acknowledged. Lenin was very clear about this, and so was Stalin and Mao. The struggle for communism within countries ruled by communists, is a long and drawn out process, in which they are “building socialism” (and not communism”) and where the economic system is “state capitalism.” There is no rule in communist parties against having billionaries or NEP men, or people owning their own businesses. During the initial years of the USSR, millions of Russians owned their own businesses (i.e., farms). And that was true under Stalin in 1928. The communists are constantly experimenting with ways of taking away economic freedom and making socialism work. Whenever these methods fail they retreat back into capitalism. Lenin was the first the do this, Gorbachev and Deng Xiaoping did this more recently; and the communists will do it again when confronted with collapse.
I so wish that you and Martin would have a conversation/debate about this. I would pay to see you straighten out this fool.
Maybe it will happen.
I posted a question a couple days ago asking for good sources that debunk conspiracy theories surrounding JFK’s assassination and the Zapruder film. Jeff answered my question and that was cool. Then my question was quoted without a reply to me by someone else and the gist of it was that we shouldn’t be asking questions about it. My motivation seemed to be questioned too in the thread. So just for the record, I am reading the book ‘Case Closed’ and I want to be able to use the knowledge to make an argument to a Blaze TV host who I respect a great deal, but who constantly refers to the Zapruder film as an example of how our government has been lying to the American people for years. He is excellent on domestic issues but isn’t as strong on matters of geopolitics. Also, back on May 5, Jeff and Alex talked a lot about the JFK assassination, including the Zapruder film, on Alex’s Friends & Enemies YT Channel. Perhaps I should have stated why I asked the question in more detail, but there is nothing wrong with studying the past guys.
Mackman: in a battle, you don’t attack the enemy’s strong point, rather you look for a weakness. Your attempt to take Posner’s book to the Blaze TV host is taking what the host will see as a weak argument against his stronghold that includes more than just the Zapruder film. See my response above.
If he’s deep into crazy, without evidence, conspiracy theories, e.g. “The CIA did it” or “the deep state was behind it”, you might as well not waste your time and effort. I ignore those people.
However, you write, “…but isn’t as strong on matters of geopolitics”. That’s his weak point. Does he realize that “the fall of the Soviet Union” was just a fake? Remind him that Putin is KGB and still a strong believer in communism. What does he know about Russian amorality and corruption? Does he recognize how much fake, so-called Russian morality is aimed at western audiences?
If you want to bring in the JFK assassination, I would bring up the German documentary that uncovered the role of Castro, KGB and communists in that assassination. I see that as making the Zapruder film somewhat irrelevant in the total picture. Broaden his horizons, showing him how these all fit together. Don’t let yourself get trapped into a narrow argument based only on the JFK assassination.
Finally, as a matter of style, make as many points as you can in the form of questions.
RO – it would be polite if you stated your sources on the JFK assassination. Whose books are you reading? Then we can better understand where you are getting your ideas on the assassination from from.
The JFK assassination is very important and you will find solid info on what the Zapruder film actually shows in Posner’s book. He sites an important study. Posner discusses this toward the end of the book. He is very thorough and sources everything. There is also another film taken in Dallas that day that nobody hardly mentions as well, which establishes a person (Oswald) was at the six floor corner window. At any rate, close analysis of the Zapruder film shows that all shots came from behind Kennedy’s motorcade. Recent scientific work has made major strides.
“Is there hope? Robert Spencer said during the conference, “Something in the human soul makes for the fall of totalitarian regimes.” That something, of course, is truth. ”
There is hope and it has to do with embracing truth, but this hope will not be fulfilled until Christians and conservatives en masse understand that communism is Satanic, that we are therefore engaged in a war against Satan, and that the only remedy can be found by first addressing the elephant in the room that constitutes the higher cause for the present terrifying world situation: that we in the West have forsaken the Word of God and betrayed the Reformation. Prophetically, this realisation will indeed happen – Thomas Goodwin (Oliver Cromwell’s pastor and leading English Puritan theologian), writing in the 1600s, called it the Second Reformation – and it will precipitate the end of ungodly rule over the affairs of men during the “great (political) earthquake” of Rev 16:18, but before we get to that point, we must first go through the most vexatious “time of trouble” humanity has ever known. The tide will turn before this decade is out, but the time between now and then is going to hit humanity like a freight train.
Off Topic
ADMINSTRATIVE ERROR MAKES KAMALA PRESIDENT – 47 Days Away The ERROR We Could Have Fixed
OFFICIAL Jovan Hutton Pulitzer – September 19, 2024
Program begins @ 12:30…
https://rumble.com/v5fj1tx-adminstrative-error-makes-kamala-president-47-days-away-the-error-we-could-.html
Care to explain? I do not like listening to Pulitzer.
Tangential to the topic rather than off-topic, note that Turkey is drawing ever closer to the Russian-led East. Not only is it a “dialogue partner” of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, it is also flirting with joining it fully and joining BRICS. All the pieces are starting to fall into place, bar the peace treaty in the Middle East that I think only Russia can broker, but that will perhaps come out of the current round of tensions there.
More on Turkey’s shenanigans:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/erdogan-says-turkey-will-deepen-ties-with-east-while-still-facing-west-2024-09-18/
It’s all about oil as a way of leveraging our allies to break with us.