Popper’s falsificationist methodology holds that scientific theories are characterized by entailing predictions that future observations might reveal to be false. When theories are falsified by such observations, scientists can respond by revising the theory, or by rejecting the theory in favor of a rival….
Encyclopedia of Philosophy
What does a correct prediction about enemy strategy tell us? It reveals the enemy’s bag of tricks. It allows us to see behind his curtain of deception. For example, in the case of KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s successful strategic predictions about the collapse of communism, we learn that the Communist Party [of the] Soviet Union decided to advance its cause by “playing possum” (i.e., a tactic of pretending to be dead, employed by opossums). Golitsyn’s prediction was successful because the Soviet Union collapsed in the manner foretold, attended by presentational inconsistencies he anticipated (i.e., that changes in the Soviet bloc would be introduced from above and the nuclear arsenal would remain intact).
Upon his defection in 1961, Golitsyn told the CIA that the Sino-Soviet split (which began in December 1960) was a ruse for luring the West into building China into a superpower. His successful prediction in this regard, was that once China was built up, China would suddenly unite with Russia and form a partnership described by Golitsyn as “one clenched fist.” That this has happened, exactly as Golitsyn described, is no longer debatable. The only question that remains is whether the strategy of playing possum (which partially succeeded), and the strategy of luring the West into building up China (which succeeded absolutely), will bring the entire world under communist control. Please note: The execution of a bold maneuver does not guarantee success. As Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke explained, “No plan of operations extends with any certainty beyond the first encounter with the main enemy forces. Only the layman believes that in the course of a campaign he sees the consistent implementation of an original thought that has been considered in advance in every detail and retained to the end.”
Many laymen, on reading Golitsyn’s account of the Soviet “long-range strategy,” become demoralized because they imagine the success of the deception translates directly into ultimate success. Yet, an opossum may attempt to fool a predator by playing dead only to have the predator eat him alive. And it would serve the opossum right.
We forget that a deception of this kind carries risks; and this includes all the unintended consequences of an outward show of impotence (i.e., the continued existence and eastward expansion of NATO, the election of Donald Trump in 2016, the revolt and open resistance of Ukraine, etc.). With these setbacks, how does Moscow play out its deception? After all, every deception has an expiration date. Eventually someone will rip off your mask if you have not chosen that moment for yourself. Here is Moscow’s dilemma.
In the West, of course, our strategists have been scrambling to cope with the reality of emerging threats – from Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China. They have yet to see the grand design, remaining blind to the trap they have fallen into. The game is not fully understood. Golitsyn’s successful predictions are still ignored, and this is a problem. If they want to understand the game, our strategists must read Golitsyn.
It is a sad fact that our Sovietologists were deceived back in 1991. As creatures of the Shopping Mall Regime, our Sovietologists followed the dictates of economic optimism. In this respect, Golitsyn’s warnings about communist deception fell on deaf ears for reasons outlined a century earlier by a German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche. Denouncing the “economic optimism” of the liberals, Nietzsche warned of a universal tyranny by way of socialism. He explained that Western man was becoming a comfort-loving, weak-minded, inwardly slavish herd animal (i.e., the Last Man). It is strangely appropriate, in this context, that the most famous Sovietologist to emerge out of the “collapse of communism” was Francis Fukuyama, who attempted to refute Nietzsche, depicting the German philosopher as a cruel advocate of inequality. In accepting the “collapse of communism,” however, Fukuyama proved Nietzsche’s point; for surely, it must be acknowledged, that as a Sovietologist Fukuyama should have read Anatoliy Golitsyn’s book, New Lies for Old. But he either did not read Golitsyn, or he was too weak-minded to entertain Golitsyn’s dark insights. Fukuyama’s embrace of communism’s collapse, and his assault on Nietzsche, came in the form of a book titled, The End of History and the Last Man. In a chapter titled “Men Without Chests,” Fukuyama gloried in his own concavity. “It is difficult to follow Nietzsche very far down the road that he takes,” wrote Fukuyama. By characterizing Nietzsche as “an open opponent of democracy,” Fukuyama evaded the question of Last Man’s weak and deluded condition. More than that, Fukuyama proved to be an example of Last Man. He was not merely the last Sovietologist. He was Last Man as Sovietologist.
It was not enough that the liberal establishment ignored Golitsyn, as Fukuyama did. Books like Thomas Mangold’s Cold Warrior appeared, lampooning the KGB defector and his CIA sponsor (James Angleton) as mentally ill. Thus began the practice, so annoying to Angleton’s admirers, of emphasizing the spymaster’s middle name – Jesus. Angleton was presented by his critics as James Jesus Angleton, which subtly recast him as a messianic lunatic.
Golitsyn’s predictions first appeared in a 1982 manuscript that was published as a book in 1984. Golitsyn warned of a coming Soviet leader who would liberalize the Soviet Union. He said the Communist Party would appear to give up its monopoly of power. He warned that anticommunism would then disappear from politics along with Western vigilance. Behind the scenes, he explained, the Communist Party would rule Russia and the former “Soviet republics” through its agents in government and business, and through the KGB. Fooled from the outset, our dysfunctional intelligence community did not foresee the collapse of communism as Golitsyn did.[i]
The fraudulent nature of communism’s collapse should be obvious today. Put the open war preparations of Moscow and Beijing side by side with the the lack of preparedness in Europe, Australia, and North America. Even more decisive, the truth of Golitsyn’s thesis is affirmed by witnesses on the ground, especially in Romania, Poland, and Czechia (not to mention the regularized fraud of Vladimir Putin). We now know that the 1989 revolutions in Eastern Europe were ordered from Moscow and prepared in advance by the KGB and its sister services.[ii] Why did the CIA fail to detect this? As noted above, Americans have come to favor comfort above truth. That is one explanation. But there is more. Imagine a sophisticated mechanism of subversion and blackmail applied by communist bloc agents of influence. Imagine a criminal espionage network involving money laundering, drug trafficking, and sex parties. In this context, when we examine the writings of Whitney Webb, in One Nation Under Blackmail, we find all sorts of “connections” between major players – from Henry Kissinger and Armand Hammer to Robert Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (the pedophile blackmailer). Think of all the billionaires and politicians who traveled on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet (the “Lolita Express”), or who visited “Lolita Island.”[iii] In Webb’s writings we find a decisive pivot-point in the year 1991. We find Jeffrey Epstein involved in Ponzi schemes, and at the root of the Bear Stearns collapse of 2008 – exactly when the Russians were pulling the rug out from under Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Webb says that Robert Maxwell, the father of Epstein’s partner in pedophilic blackmail (Ghislaine Maxwell), had set up a maze of shell companies using Soviet money. Here we find linkages with KGB agent Armand Hammer, who sponsored the Senate careers of Al Gore and Joseph Biden. We see Epstein visiting Bill Clinton’s White House in the mid-1990s (along with a host of Chinese businessmen, who helped finance Clinton’s 1996 presidential campaign). With sex and greed as lures, big fish were reeled in. The pernicious amorality of heedless ambition is readily compromised. Ill-gotten gains are sweet, but blackmail inevitably follows. The rest is history – and the falsification of history. Here we see the intersecting and parallel lines of a vast conspiracy. What these lines signify, of course, is a spiderweb made by human spiders. The political formation behind these spiders is never really identified by Ms. Webb. Failing to show the spiders’ true allegiance, Webb cannot explain the strategy that is playing out.[iv] The explanation, of course, can be found in the writings of Golitsyn.
With all the blindness and corruption in our midst, we should not lapse into hopeless pessimism. It is easy to imagine that this web of corruption and subversion forms an unbreakable chain that binds our society to a self-destructive path; but mechanisms of this kind do not always work as the designers might hope. And people, especially those with criminal propensities, will try and break their chains. Some will threaten to blab. Others will leave the organization. In this context, one thinks back to all those oligarchs in Russia who fall out of windows or whose planes fall out of the sky. Think, also, of those who have committed suicide in the vicinity of Bill and Hillary Clinton. The number of suicides is so laughably improbable, someone coined the term “Arkancide” as a joke. The Urban Dictionary humorously defines Arkancide as, “When you attempt to testify against Hillary Clinton and your house explodes.” The number of suicides, plane crashes, and gunshot victims linked to Bill and Hillary is more than a suggestive statistical outlier. In the memoirs of some Clinton associates we read about the “boys on the tracks” murder (of Don Henry and Kevin Ives). Then there was the death of Treasury Secretary Ron Brown, who was under investigation by the Office of Independent Counsel. According to Brown’s mistress, after the Treasury Secretary threatened to take Clinton down with him, Brown was dispatched to Dubrovnik Croatia where he died in a plane crash. According to medical personnel involved in processing the bodies from the crash, an apparent .45-caliber bullet-hole was discovered in Ron Brown’s head. The x-rays showed a cloud of debris consistent with the fragmenting of a bullet inside the brain. One of the pathologists on the AFIP team, Lt. Col. Steven Cogswell (USAF), was silenced on this matter when a gag order was placed on him. Related to this case, in November 1998, I met Petty Officer Kathleen Janoski while waiting to do a television interview in Washington, D.C. She was the Navy medical photographer who found the .45 caliber hole in Brown’s head while inspecting bodies from the Dubrovnik crash. She told me the White House dispatched a U.S. Navy captain to confiscate the x-rays that showed the .45 caliber hole. Meanwhile, the military pathologists wanted to conduct an autopsy on Ron Brown, but were overruled by the White House. Such was the death of a cabinet secretary under Clinton. Then there was the death of White House Counsel Vince Foster, who was found dead of a gunshot wound at Fort Marcy Park. His death was ruled a suicide. Then there is the case of former Clinton White House intern Mary Mahoney, gunned down in a Starbucks; and the head of security for Clinton’s 1992 campaign headquarters, Jerry Parks, gunned down after leaving a Mexican restaurant in Little Rock (Parks allegedly had dirt on the Clintons). Then there was Clinton fundraiser Edward Willey, who died of a gunshot wound in the woods (whose wife, Kathleen Willey, was threatened after she charged that Clinton had sexually assaulted her). Another statistical outlier was Clinton’s National Finance Co-chairman C. Victor Raiser II, who died in a plane crash. Of more recent vintage, Clinton campaign worker Seth Rich was gunned down in an assassination-style attack while walking at night in his neighborhood. Rich’s murder was not a robbery as his wallet, credit cards and cell phone were not taken. Some believe Rich had given Julian Assange the damning internal DNC emails the Russians supposedly hacked (on Trump’s instructions). And then, of course, we come to the “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein, the pedophile who flew former President Bill Clinton on so many trips. How do you hang yourself with bedsheets while you are in jail, in an observation cell with windows, and the subject of a suicide watch? After an investigation of the matter, Attorney General William Barr said it was “a perfect storm of screwups.” But then, how is it a screwup when two cameras malfunction in front of Epstein’s cell? This is not a screwup, and it is not “a perfect storm of screwups.” No. It’s a competent hitman who has covered his tracks.[v]
Many people say these deaths are not sinister. Please ask yourself: How many of your friends and work colleagues have committed suicide? How many of your associates have been blown away by gunfire? How many of your colleagues have died in plane crashes? I have one friend who died by falling off a balcony many years ago. Aside from that, I just cannot think of a single suspicious death among my acquaintances, let alone a dozen deaths. You can mock all this as “conspiracy theory,” but I have not presented a theory. I have presented facts. And I have presented Golitsyn’s strategic predictions. And with those predictions we would expect to see a vast spiderweb, and anomalous deaths; for spiders will protect their web, and sometimes get entangled in it themselves. And so we find that the closer you get to the spiderweb, the more at risk you are. When we match this up with the assassinated journalists, politicians, and businessmen in Russia, we hit upon the core of the spiderweb, where the deepest secrets are protected. The common denominator here is the Soviet and Chinese long-range strategy. Of course, the deception machinery requires a lot of killing. Some people know too much, or threaten to say too much, and must be dealt with.
How does this play out in terms of Russian and Chinese strategy? Can they defeat America with such tactics? To answer this question, imagine that you are one of the spiders. Imagine you are the king of spiders – the President of the United States. Imagine you were a socialist youth who traveled behind the iron curtain from December 1969 through January 1970. Imagine you met with intelligence officials who promised to help your career when you returned to the United States. Imagine you agreed to be their ally, their friend. Imagine 29 years have passed and, indeed, they helped your career – from Governor of a small state to President of all the states; and so, you find yourself seated across from the President of Russia. For years he has been badgering you to stop America’s nuclear weapons production (which you did), and to keep the ABM Treaty in place so America will not have ballistic missile defenses. But more than that, he wants you to exploit the “the collapse of communism” by pulling America’s troops out of Europe, out of NATO.
Would you do what the Russian President asks? Or would you realize how dangerous it might be to accommodate him? Put yourself in the place of such an American president. Do you dare give your “friends” everything they want? Or do you give them just enough to keep them from playing their blackmail card? Perhaps they remind you, through a third party, that they have compromising information on you. “Look,” they tell you, “We can keep this material out of the media. We are here to help.” Does that compel you to pull out of Europe? Or do you lack the power to carry out such a policy?
If you are smart, of course, you realize that it’s your funeral if you give them everything they want. And it also might be your funeral if you give them nothing. You want to keep the wolf from the door without burning the house down. And yes, the wolf wants the house to burn because of those tasty little piggies – the West European democracies. How scrumptious they are! One should also remember that an American president has a nuclear button of his own. How do you blackmail someone who can nuke you? There is a problem here, which must be worked out. And Moscow dares not expose their White House “friend” because Moscow would be exposing many other “friends” at the same time.
Consider, then, a transcript of the last meeting between Boris Yeltsin and Bill Clinton, in Istanbul Turkey, 19 November 1999, starting on page 3 of the declassified transcript from the Clinton Presidential Library (https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/57569):
CLINTON [to Boris Yeltsin]: I signed no such law [abrogating the ABM Treaty]. People in Congress don’t like the ABM Treaty. If Congress had its way, they would undermine the treaty. I’m trying to uphold it. But we need a national missile defense to protect against rogue states. We can’t have a national missile defense that works without changing the ABM Treaty. But I want to do this cooperatively. I want to persuade you that this is good for both of us. The primary purpose is to protect against terrorists and rogue states. It would be ineffective against Russia. The system we’re looking at would operate against just 20 missiles. And, Boris I want to figure out how to share the benefits. For all I know, in twenty years terrorists could have access to nuclear weapons. I know your people don’t agree with me, but I’m not trying to overthrow the ABM Treaty. We’re still trying to discover what’s technically possible with national missile defense, but there are people in America who want to throw over the ABM Treaty. I have made no decisions yet.
YELTSIN: Bill, Bill. I got your note. It went into all these things in incredible detail. I read it and was satisfied. I’ve not yet ceased to believe in you.
I ask you one thing. Just give Europe to Russia. The U.S. is not in Europe. Europe should be the business of Europeans. Russia is half European and half Asian. [Italics added]
CLINTON: So you want Asia, too?
YELTSIN: Sure, sure, Bill. Eventually, we will have to agree on all of this.
CLINTON: I don’t think the Europeans would like this very much.
YELTSIN: Not all. But I am a European. I live in Moscow. Moscow is in Europe and I like it. You can take all the other states and provide security for them. I will take Europe and provide them security. Well, not I. Russia will….
Bill, I am serious. Give Europe to Europe itself. Europe never felt as close to Russia as it does now. We have no difference of opinion with Europe, except maybe on Afghanistan and Pakistan – which, by the way, is training Chechens. These are bandits….
We have the power in Russia to protect all of Europe, including those with missiles. We’ll make all the appropriate treaties with China.
[End of Excerpt]
This could not have been the first time Clinton heard the refrain, “Just give Europe to Russia.” Gorbachev continually harped on “the one common European home.” Does anyone ever ask what this “common European home” signifies? Russia’s plans for Europe come out in this transcript. The plan does not appear in the mouth of Vladimir Putin, but in the mouth of Boris Yeltsin. This is exactly what Golitsyn meant by saying that the “collapse of communism” would be a ruse. Moscow employed a new strategy, as described by Kremlin advisor Georgy Arbatov in December 1988. “We are taking away the image of your enemy,” he said. This was the strategic maneuver Golitsyn had predicted. And they executed that maneuver. Of course, the execution of a strategic maneuver is always messy – with unexpected twists and turns. But they did it, and they lived with it, and now they are forced to improvise – to mobilize armies and threaten the West with nuclear war. They took the deception as far as they could. Bill Clinton and his successors could not eliminate NATO. They could not give Europe to Russia. As Clinton said, Europe would not like it – and would not go along.
How much love there was for Russia back then. How much trust. And yet, Yeltsin was the same as Putin. He was grabbing for Europe the same as Putin does now. Only Yeltsin did it with a smile as Putin is doing it with armies and by threatening nuclear war. It was clever of Yeltsin to reassure his friend Bill, “I’ve not yet ceased to believe in you.” But underneath, the Kremlin realized its mistake. Even if Clinton had wanted to give Europe to Russia, it was a bridge too far. And everyone who cared about the security of the West would have smelled a rat.
The Russians then turned to their Islamic friends, to their Chechen alibi, and to the terror attacks of 9/11/01. This operation successfully diverted American military and intelligence resources into Iraq and Afghanistan. This took the spotlight off Russia and China. The ill-preparedness and fiscal exhaustion of the West owes much to the aftermath of 9/11. Meanwhile, Whitney Webb is right to say that America is riddled with dirty characters who have mixed organized crime with intelligence work. But not knowing Golitsyn’s writings, she lacks the key to understanding how this all fits together. The corruption agenda is the agenda of Russia and China – of the communist bloc and the communist world movement (which has come to disguise itself behind non-communist slogans and causes). Subversion is best carried out in a corrupt state. Subversion is easier where officials can be bought and elections stolen.
Since this is our situation, the best solution is an offer of amnesty. Let our corrupt leaders come forward and tell the truth. Let them unburden themselves. Give them thirty days to turn themselves in. If not, we will hang them. See who comes forward. See how quickly the spiderweb collapses. Naturally we would not allow such people to hold high office again. The point is, to learn the truth, to have the details, to unravel the enemy’s networks here in the West.
A few weeks ago, Mr. Wang of Lude Media said that the Chinese communist leaders thought Biden was their guy when he first assumed office. But now they do not see him that way. If Beijing says to Biden, “Give us America,” Biden is forced to say, “America would not like that.” This is the same as when Yeltsin asked for Europe. Clinton said Europe would not like it. “Oh yes,” he might have said, “You helped my career. You repaid my friendship; but you did not pay me enough to commit suicide.”
With this in mind, we might ask whether the relationship between Moscow and their corrupt Western partners has broken down. And yes, there has been a partial breakdown. To what extent, we cannot exactly say. On the way to socialist paradise everyone has discovered something more fundamental than Marxist theory. They have discovered national interest. They have also discovered personal survival. Here we find a flaw in Russia’s long-range strategy. Deception and subterfuge have natural limits. You can trick someone only so far. The day comes when you ask for Europe, and they refuse you. What happens then? As Machiavelli explained long ago, fraud must be attended by force. The day dawns when the instrument of deception breaks down and must be supplemented with another instrument – an instrument we are all being openly threatened with.
That instrument is the hydrogen bomb.
Jimmy From Brooklin Interview 19
Cold War History – The JFK Assassination
Friends and Enemies
Links and Notes
[i] Mark Riebling wrote, “CIA’s top leadership acknowledged that it had fallen short in predicting Gorbachev’s reforms, but could provide no real excuse. ‘Who would have thought that just five years ago we would stand where we are today?’ Robert Gates told Congress in late 1991. ‘Talk about humbling experiences.’ Gates could have said: Our reporting was poor because our Moscow network was rolled up, coincidentally or not, precisely as Gorbachev was coming into power.” CIA Director Robert Gates told Congress that the CIA had no crystal ball, but was only there to help Congress “think through the problem….” But as Riebling explained, there was someone who “had predicted glasnost and perestroika, in detail, even before Gorbachev came to power. This person’s analysis of events in the communist world had even been provided to the Agency on a regular basis. But the American intelligence community had chosen not to listen – and the roots of that willful deafness could be traced back, ultimately, thirty years, to a series of developments that caused a clash of mind-sets between CIA and FBI.” According to Riebling, “In 1982, KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn had submitted a top-secret manuscript to CIA. In it, he foresaw that [the] leadership of the USSR would by 1986 ‘or earlier’ fall to ‘a younger man with a more liberal image,’ who would initiate changes that would have been beyond the imagination of Marx or the practical reach of Lenin and unthinkable to Stalin.’ The coming liberalization, Golitsyn said, ‘would be spectacular and impressive.’” Riebling added, “Golitsyn provided an entire chapter of such predictions, containing 194 distinct auguries. Of these, 46 were not falsifiable at the time this book went to press…. Yet of Golitsyn’s falsifiable predictions, 139 out of 148 were fulfilled by the end of 1993 – an accuracy rate of nearly 94 percent.” Quoted from, Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1994), pp. 407-408.
[ii] See Andrei Codrescu’s book, The Hole in the Flag. Or read Robert Buchar’s book, And Reality Be Damned.
[iii] The name “Lolita,” in this instance, is derived from a 1955 novel of that name by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov. It is the story of a man’s obsession with a 12-year-old girl.
[iv] Whitney Webb, One Nation Under Blackmail, Vol. 2, is the one that deserves special attention. Those familiar with the history of communist subversion and methods will begin to suspect a solid chain, held by a coven of spiders in Moscow.
[v] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_body_count_conspiracy_theory
238 responses to “What Do Golitsyn’s Correct Predictions Tell Us?”
Those with the largest and best intelligence service, and dominance over the moevement for decades, are going to remain at the top of the food chain. Any comrade who opposes them can go face down in the soup at any moment.
Gorbachev laid it all out in black and white in his 1987 programmatic book, “Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World”, addressing apparently the “interested”:
“I think one thing should be borne in mind when studying the origins and essence of perestroika in the USSR. Perestroika is no whim on the part of some ambitious individuals or a group of leaders. If it were, no exhortations, plenary meetings or even a party congress could have rallied the people to the work which we are now doing and which involves more and more Soviet people each day.” (p. 17)
“They tell us that nothing will come of perestroika within the framework of our system. They say we should change this system and borrow from the experience of another socio-political system. To this they add that, if the Soviet Union takes this path and gives up its socialist choice, close links with the West will supposedly become possible. They go so far as to claim that the October 1917 Revolution was a mistake which almost completely cut off our country from world social progress. – To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika — and the program as a whole, for that matter — is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy.” (p. 36) [The phrase, “and the program as a whole, for that matter”, is a clear hint at the Soviets’ long-term strategy of deception and disinformation elaborated in the late 1950s and launched around 1960.]
“Fourteen out of fifteen citizens living in the USSR today were born after the Revolution. And we are still being urged to give up socialism. Why should the Soviet people, who have grown and gained in strength under socialism, abandon that system? We will spare no effort to develop and strengthen socialism. I think that a minimum of the new system’s potential has been tapped so far.” (p. 42)
“It may seem that our current perestroika could be called a ‘revolution from above.’ True, the perestroika drive started on the Communist Party’s initiative, and the Party leads it. The Party is strong and bold enough to work out a new policy. It has proved capable of heading and launching the process of renewal of society. The Party started the effort with self-improvement. I spoke frankly about it at the meeting with Party activists in Khabarovsk, in the summer of 1986. We must begin with ourselves, I said. Everyone must assume the responsibility: in the Politburo, in local bodies, and in grass-roots Party organizations. We must be better than we are. We shall help those who can’t improve themselves. The main thing is to be conscientious. We have grown accustomed to many practices when there was no openness. This applies to both the rank and file and high officials.” (p. 55)
And it was also Gorbachev who threatened Germany openly on Dec. 10, 2011, when he was honoured with the Franz Josef Strauß Award in Munich. Here are the final sentences of his acceptance speech, which was in fact a brutal Leninist rant:
“But this isn’t yet the essential point I want to make. I have the impression that – of course we aren’t out of the old crisis yet, and there are already signs on the horizon for a new crisis, but – as Lenin calmed his comrades-in-arms, this was when the Soviet power came into being, when there was a chaotic situation in the country: ‘Yes, of course we have chaos, but from chaos spring up new forms of life’. And therefore, chaos is a problem, a crisis is a problem, all this isn’t easy, but there are always included opportunities that definitely should be made use of. And I wish the Germans a healthy New Year. And this time you will still have enough bratwursts and pork-knuckles for New Year’s Eve. Well, and as for the next New Year’s Eve, we should think about that, together! And, I tell you quite frankly: It is for me a special, an emotional day. And regarding the accomplishments that I myself associate with my life – the German question, the destiny of Germany – these were for me of determining importance. And I’m proud of what I could do. – Thank you very much! I’m wishing you good success!”
“What Lenin clamed his comrades-in-arms”? Who would insert such a phrase in a speech other than a communist! He can taste victory. Europe is almost — ALMOST — in their grasp. But then, the Euromaidan Revolution happened. More chaos! But Gorbachev and Lenin say chaos is good.
Here is that entire segment, basically the second half, of Gorbachev’s speech of Dec. 10, 2011. It’s quite something.
(Transcript from the original audio, which only has this second half of the speech, and German-to-English translation by myself. I didn’t put paragraphs as Gorbachev’s speech was one uninterrupted piece of Marxist-Leninist brutality. The full speech was only published several months later as a quite streamlined print version by the host, the CSU-affiliated Hanns Seidel Foundation, provided to them by Gorbachev’s people.)
hss.de/fileadmin/user_upload/HSS/Dokumente/111210_RM_Gorbatschow.pdf
“[…] And it is good that there are no more walls; but, dividing lines are again emerging. And if one should be worried about something, and what today’s politicians should think about, in Central Europe, also in Eastern Europe etc., what they should think about is: under no circumstances to allow a war, under no circumstances to allow a new confrontation. I know why the politicians in Russia react so sharply to the missile defence in Europe, to its intended stationing. But now I’m also slowly asking myself: What’s this all about? For, what we can see is that the missile defence is meant as a defence against Russia. Everything else is just talk, or a wall of fog to cover the truth. Yes, and as a result, the Russian government said: We’re going to station means of defence, here and there, and we are ready to use weapons that guarantee our security. What does this mean? World War III! And if Russia and the USA should again be at loggerheads, this is World War III! This won’t be restricted to a local war! And we need to again clearly remember the lesson, you know: The Cold War was over; our partners were triumphing, and they wouldn’t see the forest for the trees any more, in the West, and especially in the USA. They wanted to build a new empire, with a super-super-super-power – to which I say: The Germans are a serious and reflecting nation, and they know well what is being said in the USA; and when they don’t react to it and sometimes nod, it means all this can’t be taken for serious: It’s the attempt to threaten Russia a bit; and there is still in Europe a bit of fear left towards Russia. Yet, we only wish to build and develop: No one has led more wars in the 20th century than us. So much we had to suffer, and, just as a sidenote: We had no plans after WWII to start military action against the USA. I know it. I must know it. And, suddenly, all this starts all over again. This reminds me of those 200 or 300 U.S. bases, spread all over the world, from the Cold War era. And have they been of any use to anybody? I have the impression that the evildoer of the system in which the West lives, and so with the consent of Washington, this radical market philosophy, all this hasn’t turned out positively. What have we got? Bubbles! One bubble after another, and they all burst. And, one should understand at last that the solution can’t be an arms race, the militarisation of the world and the economy, because we’d keep on throwing money out the window. And former Finance Minister Waigel spoke of 10 billion DM or Dollar, of course it was Mark, Deutschmark, that he didn’t give to Gorbachev at that time. How much money are we simply throwing out the window! Eisenhower is again quoted these days, General and President Eisenhower. Yesterday I had again the idea to watch that movie: ‘FFF’. – No. – ‘JFK’. On the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I like such films, and one should watch them from time to time just so as to remain awake; if possible: wide-awake! And, Eisenhower, to come back to that, said that the military-industrial complex is a dangerous thing and one should never lose control over it! He said that in a way as had never been said before. And I want to say: The man was right! The military-industrial complex in our grand countries, that’s those who set the tone, who exert pressure on politics. I know how our military-industrial complex is doing this, and it is still very critical of Gorbachev because of Perestroika and the freeing of the country from these military expenditures. But, these people have been accustomed to always ‘play the first fiddle’, and I think that if an economy cannot provide for its people, it is an ill economy; and such an economy must be cured, and so by radical means! This was my idea, this was my approach. And I’m still repeating it today. But, no, what are they telling people? They are telling them things that make them afraid. Well, and now they’re arming up. But when one looks at the situation thoroughly, one can easily see that our government is acting correctly and appropriately, because – I just say: the devil take it – there is no system for executing global decisions in a world that is already global. We simply still lack such mechanisms, and I have heard with great interest that, as has been said by your Prime Minister [Bavaria’s Prime Minister at the time, Horst Seehofer], ‘we are ready to help, but not to throw money into a bottomless pit.’ After all, it was the Germans who initiated the Euro, the European single currency, and therefore Germany carries also great responsibility, and Germany is big and strong, and thus carries an especially great responsibility, from which it cannot just steal away. But, this is also about the processes within the countries. Many have entered the EU in an expectation of having things for free, I think you know exactly what I mean. Yes, so quickly did they rush to the West and left the Warsaw Pact and COMECON, all up and away towards the West, and the West immediately welcomed them and quickly incorporated these new countries, which all entered suit the United Nations. And you yourselves have greatly furthered this development. Thus: Look who is talking! And, shouldn’t one be grateful to the Greeks for having established the fundaments of our civilisation? But, well, I believe we know exactly what we need to think of each other, and we must build a system for executing global decisions in a global world. And for this, new systems, new models are needed! Betting on super-profits, super-consumption, and the like, leads nowhere. That’s of no use! Now, we have a billionaire who owns a submarine. And now he wants to commission a second one. Is this going to give the man happiness? No! One should find a small submarine, torpedo his first one in order to prevent the second one from being built; because no one needs this. Who needs this? And I ask you, my dear Germans: stand you also by your responsibility! You have initiated the Euro-zone, and as soon as the control mechanisms become effective, this system will be precisely what Europe and the world need! I think we should all really think about, together, how we can prevent a violent solution of the problems at hand, because when someone chooses force, this is the most dangerous thing that there is; and I repeat: We’re again in an arms race! It’s obviously about re-militarisation, not only militarisation of the economy, but also of consciousness. We are ill; we all need to be treated and cured! And Generals again become heroes, Generals who believe they had disarmed too much, one missile of many thousands, that’s too much. And here I ask myself: How do the Generals think? If one bets on solving problems militarily, then one is making a mistake, and I’d like to say this again, I’ve heard this, we just had in France an annual meeting, the annual conference of the World Political Forum, that I brought into being several years ago, really a serious organisation; there it was said: To bet on force and strength isn’t efficient. The nations, and most politicians, condemn such an attitude. And at the end we came to the conclusion that wars do not solve problems, and in earlier days thinkers said that war is necessary, that war brings about a movement ahead etc. – No! War means a giant failure of politics. For what should one take up arms, aeroplanes, extremely destructive weapons? And why? Because the politicians got it wrong, because the politicians still lag behind the fast changes in the world. And, so to speak, the Russians, the Germans, the French, the Americans, the Japanese, and now also the Chinese, by the way, these nations are responsible for providing for the world a peaceful, positive perspective. And, also, it’s definitely wrong to believe one could hide away, one could sit out anything. No one can hide any more or sit anything out! Also small countries need contacts. I believe I have now strayed quite far from the Franz-Josef-Strauß Award, but I’m convinced that the one is closely connected to the other; connected to the legacy passed on to us by smart brains. I’d like to once again express my heartfelt thanks. You know, I speak at home, here in Germany, in Europe, in the world; I advocate cooperation and of course a deepening in the cooperation between Russia and Germany. Because, this means very, very much for the overall situation; it stabilises it, develops it towards a positive outcome, and the people who are demonstrating in Wall Street demand social justice and equality. And, as you can see, also in the EU, mistakes were made. But this isn’t yet the essential point I want to make. I have the impression that – of course we aren’t out of the old crisis yet, and there are already signs on the horizon for a new crisis, but – as Lenin calmed his comrades-in-arms, this was when the Soviet power came into being, when there was a chaotic situation in the country: “Yes, of course we have chaos, but from chaos spring up new forms of life“. And therefore, chaos is a problem, a crisis is a problem, all this isn’t easy, but there are always included opportunities that definitely should be made use of. And I wish the Germans a healthy New Year. And this time you will still have enough bratwursts and pork-knuckles for New Year’s Eve. Well, and as for the next New Year’s Eve, we should think about that, together! And, I tell you quite frankly: It is for me a special, an emotional day. And regarding the accomplishments that I myself associate with my life – the German question, the destiny of Germany – these were for me of determining importance. And I’m proud of what I could do. – Thank you very much! I’m wishing you good success!”
This is their threat.
This speech must have been swept under the rug, as it’s so blatantly aggressive. I checked the archives of Bavarian television back in 2012 and found nothing. Newspaper articles about the event hardly discussed the content of Gorbachev’s speech. Only a few apparently communist YouTube channels have the crucial second half of the speech as video (which is how I stumbled across it, to begin with) and seem to use it to spread anxiety. The official print version published by the Hanns Seidel Foundation in March 2012 (and handed to them by Team Gorbachev!) is massively streamlined. All the brutal passages are somewhat polished away …
It is quite something. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin — all the same.
The Hanns Seidel Foundation’s PDF-file that has the speech in print (though immensely streamlined) says: “Vorlage: Datei des Autors”, meaning: file provided by the author. And surely, Gorby & friends polished the speech clean as far as possible …
The German interpreter, who appeared very precise, used the phrase, “… hat Lenin seine Kampfgefährten beruhigt …”, which is fair enough to be translated into English as “as Lenin calmed his comrades-in-arms”.
The late Henry Kissinger perfectly echoed that exact sentiment on January 5, 2009 with regard to the 2007/08 financial crisis, cheering President-elect Barack Obama on:
“His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity. It isn’t just a crisis.”
I just realised that back in 2012, I actually transcribed and translated into English, this Gorbachev speech in its entirety (the first half based on the streamlined text version, the second half based on the video footage, in other words: based on what was actually said). One needs to scroll down by not quite 20% to chapter 6: “Mikhail Gorbachev’s Shocking Blackmail Speech of Dec. 10, 2011”:
https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/forward-comrades-not-back-america-on-the-brink-of-communism/
QUOTE :
We now know that the 1989 revolutions in Eastern Europe were ordered from Moscow and prepared in advance by the KGB and its sister services.[ii] Why did the CIA fail to detect this?
————–
The CIA was penetrated and taken over by the KGB and her sister services, and by CP USA, which then explains that there is no willingness to detect any communist conspiracy at all, and then allow the whole system to decay, pretending incompetence and idiocy, and at the same time establish pro-communist policies and help their advancement as much as possible.
They want to control and RULE the whole world, and those who stand in their way are all planned to be exterminated and or “re-educated” (Siberia, and elsewhere)…
America has lost that battle decades ago, only that Americans have not yet realized the extent of that lost battle (and the whole war against communism).
When you have members of the supposedly “conservative” media claiming that they have no interest in that “anti-communist thing”, then you know the country and the whole world is headed for a serious evil times, and the commies have it all prepared, and they will not back off, and they will see to it that, no matter how many millions of lives it costs, they win and take over the whole world, as these atheistic fanatic criminals are absolutely convinced, in their atheistic communist fanaticism, that there is no better life in the world but when the whole world is communist.
The ONLY way to deal with it is to eradicate them, and make them pay for all these evils, declare them criminal terrorist organization and system of extreme evil, diabolical monsters of the worst order who must never possess any political etc. powers and must be eliminated and destroyed by true justice…BUT today, this is not possible to be done, it is already TOO LATE – most of the world’s governments are penetrated by communists and communist agents and their policies reflect that…and so then the situation is headed for some very evil times, with perhaps short periods of somewhat temporary reliefs, which, at this point, are simply questionable to occur.
The impotence of those who should otherwise raise their voice and do the right thing (bring all communists = democrats = socialists to justice on charges of treason and electoral fraud, preparations for subversion and terrorism etc.), that impotence today is the proof that there is no real leaders in the western countries and that the whole fraud of the collapse of communism and its strategy of convergence has succeeded, and it is almost complete.
The warnings of Our Lady of Fatima are not a joke, not at all (about Russia spreading her evils around the world…various nations will be annihilated….).
Coincidently my parents were married and I was baptized and went to school at Our Lady of Fatima RCC in New Castle DE. I’ve always known about it since very early childhood. I don’t follow the line on this. Here is a video that shows a different picture. If you want to talk about it more you can email me. So as not to derail Jeff’s site. https://youtu.be/iLP9kjWxcB4?si=9bh_Zg1f6CMkdlEx
The Apparition of Mother of God at Fatima or anywhere else are not open to discussion nor private (and thus erroneous) explanations nor opinions of various non-Catholic elements, but must always rely on the teaching of the genuine Roman Catholic Church, which excludes the Novus Ordo Apostate Sect – always. And so this topic is not open to discussion of any kind whatsoever, which rule must be followed, as the whole situation is also a matter of Holy Scripture, namely mentioned in Ezechiel 37, 38 and also in the Apocalypse 20 etc. That is the rule of the Catholic religion, which to transgress is mortally sinful, so there is no possibility of any discussion on the subject.
Excellent.
You’ve made yourself clear. I don’t agree but that’s fine, I’m no longer Roman Catholic.
We should avoid religious controversy. We have Christian’s of different denominations here, and opinions vary on interpreting scriptures. So let us set religious arguments aside.
Concerned, I don’t share your pessimism. True, we’re at a situation as described by Churchill where we should have fought when it was easy and victory assured, but now we fight because it’s the right thing to do and victory is not assured. I personally may not survive. But to say that the war is lost before we’ve begun to fight is defeatist. Once the battle is joined, much of the confusion on the right will be swept away.
As much as there is today the widespread error about Churchill and a clearly false perception that somehow he was anti-communist to the core, it is very unfortunate to assert that he was, and it does not hold to the absolute truth of the matter, as his role in the treasonous betrayal of Poland and Czechoslovakia etc. at Yalta and his role in helping Stalin to gain access to then still democratic and free Eastern Europe and thus to spread the Russian Bolshevik territory, and so much so vastly as Stalin subsequently did, and the whole notion (also absolutely fraudulent and tragically erroneous) that only somewhat appeasement of the communists is the right way to go, instead of fighting them to the victory and complete eradication of communism at the end and never to shake hands nor accommodate them in anything, that is the sole outcome of what these traitors as Churchill, Roosevelt and even Truman have caused and that their evil betrayal of this principle of justice and their criminal aid to the advancement of Russian communist tyranny (no matter how many times afterwards Churchill tried to sugarcoat it with his useless speeches about the “Iron Curtain” and “what else should we have done” etc.), that is what the world is paying for today, the kind of Kerensky-Chamberlain mentality, and the decadence of incompetent or outright pro-communist helpers and useful idiots who should have never been anywhere near any position of political power at all, as that when they had that power and their deeds using it were the proof of how much damage to true justice and genuine opposition to communism they have caused by their help and aid to spread it, and this to the mass-murdering communist criminal as Stalin was.
On the other hand when the Polish PM Gen. Sikorski was killed in that suspicious plane crash at British Gibraltar, Churchill was very much silent about it, perhaps even re-leaved, because Sikorski has found out about the Russian NKVD involvement in the Katyn Forrest massacre and wanted to hold Stalin responsible for it, which true approach such treasonous snakes as Churchill and Roosevelt didn’t welcome at all…
Churchill is paying for his evils in Hell, and so is Roosevelt etc., as God’s justice is infallible and cannot be perverted.
Today, it is too late to amend this damage and yes, communism is spreading worldwide and unless the ordinary people stop being so hedonistic and begin finally to value the truth and liberty of conscience more than their lives, they will have to endure the evils of this diabolical plague of the atheistic communism when it will rule the whole world – this is not pessimism, but reality of the matter today.
Churchill was an anticommunist. His Fulton speech kicked off the Cold War. As a politician he was not consistent. Of course, he made an alliance with Stalin to beat Hitler. It is hard to see what other choice he had. Yet he admitted his guilt of giving away countries to Stalin, and regretted it.
I don’t think Churchill was the only one involved giving eastern Europe over to Stalin. FDR, and the Soviet agents in his admin, played a very large part in it.
Realistically, the Red Army occupied all the areas they took and the West was left with accepting what was already an accomplished fact — or soon would be. What is interesting is how General Marshall helped this accomplished fact along, and how Hitler’s strategy of attacking the American forces on 16 December 1944 also accommodated Stalin. Everyone seemed to be doing what Stalin wanted. How could this be? Agents of influence in Berlin, Washington and London.
I was able to see the northern lights last night, something I did not expect to see in my lifetime. Stayed up late to watch it crossing the sky. Quite beautiful.
When I went to bed, I had dreams of nuclear war, the UK being targeted and having to go into hiding. In the dream, I somehow knew what I needed to do.
https://youtu.be/M3f8FK0MCrg?si=P0iy4QaT6n6CocO4
A Word to the Wise:
Warning from the Center for Security Policy President Lt. Colonel Tommy Waller.
Warning Will Robinson! Warning! Warning! Massive Solar Storm Approaching Earth!!
SOLAR STORM EXPECTED TO ARRIVE TONIGHT May 10,2024 OR TOMORROW!!!
https://mail.proton.me/u/37/inbox/KwNBxpEOmariOoFPz-2qpji55TAyDPWVUqembvyLAiy9SncJYrpGrgST76xwyD_PKXwQEoXQdRw2OUk8gcoZ8w==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3yBeVoYynU
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/03/04/what-a-major-solar-storm-could-do-to-our-planet
The ongoing events in the world are showing that Golitsyn’s One Clenched Fist is coming true.
Venezuela prepares to mobilize
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2024/05/venezuela-guyana-essequibo-border-dispute-referendum/678173/
Russia starts its counteroffensive
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-mounts-surprise-assault-on-northern-ukraine-in-most-serious-cross-border-offensive-in-two-years/ar-BB1maNuQ
The battles in Gaza are taking all necessary attentions and aids towards Ukraine
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/05/10/israel-rafah-gaza-hamas-displaced/
On a serious note, where is my original post here, Mr Nyquist? I was posting an interesting speculation to serve a food for thought.
I am sorry, but those posts were not suitable. Shorter and more coherent would be better.
I saw the claim by a Venezuelan that Essequibo had been a part of Venezuela since earliest times, so I looked up historical maps—Essequibo was pictured since the 1500s as part of Guyana. Guyana didn’t take part in the Bolivarian revolt against Spain, as it was not a Spanish colony. This is a clear case of aggression against an English speaking country of South America.
Oh yes, Venezuela is ruled by a communist.
There’s some sovietoïd level of censorship on this blog. Not very «judeo-christian».
I do not tolerate disrespectful or disruptive trolls. My blog my rules.
My comment was neither one nor the other, as you well know. You’re not what you pretend.
I do not remember censoring any of your posts intentionally. I will check the spam folder and see if it hit stuck.
Considering you’re a Soviet, you should be quite happy, yet you’re not. Aww.
Hi Friends, there was an important element of strategic deception called “perestroika” that is worthy of mentioning; “Professor” Jeffrey Sachs is an economist from Harvard (if I remember well) who concocted a theory that by just “snapping your fingers” the limping, controlled “economies” of Eastern European countries would be transformed overnight into blossoming free markets. He was invited to Poland by “prof” Leszek Balcerowicz, a high-ranking communist apparatchik turned “free market” enthusiast who acted as a deputy Premier under the quasi-conservative Premier Tadeusz Mazowiecki who headed the first Polish government in newly “liberated” Poland.
Balcerowicz was the person fully in charge of the economic “transformation’ of Poland and under his “leadership” thousands upon thousands of factories, agricultural enterprises were closed under the guise of “privatization”. Hundreds of thousands lost their livelihood, hundreds of billions were stolen and inflation reached into thousands precent.
Obviously, in such a situation, the people became disillusioned and desperate and began turning back towards the former communists subsequently returning them to power and thus allowing them to continue the process of Poland’s destruction.
Jeffrey Sachs was then invited by the Russian Premier (I don’t remember his name but only that he was a short and plumpy guy) and it was still under Gorbatschow, allegedly to “help”
to conduct the economic transformation of Russia into a successful market economy. The result of this “transformation” is known to us very well.
Needless to say that Sachs was invited to act as a cover for the communist strategy to steal, to destroy, to throw the people into despair and make them run under the “protective” wings of former communist regimes. That has happened in virtually every former communist country.
Poland, however, was chosen by the Bolsheviks as a laboratory for that inhuman experiment.
Thanks to Sachs’ involvement in that process the communists could and would later shift blame to the so called “West” for their economic misfortune and accuse it of a deliberate attempt to destroy the Soviet Union and subsequently Russia.
After having helped to inflict economic destruction in the Soviet Union and the Eastern Europe, Sachs travelled to South America where he managed to achieve similar results and thus we have also lost to the communists Columbia and Venezuela.
Jeffrey Sachs can now be spotted, along with other charlatans like John Mearsheimer, Scott Ritter, in various “social media” and on YouTube, in particular, defending and excusing Russia and trying to convince us that the only way to avoid further escalation of the war in Ukraine is to force this country to surrender.
Regards – Bogdan
In “post-Soviet” Russia under Boris Yeltsin and Yegor Gaidar, they called it, most cynically: “shock therapy”! Make life so hard for everybody under “democracy” (even though there never was introduced a genuine democracy) and “capitalism” (even though there were never introduced any free markets) that everybody is “cured”, once and for all, from all “false hopes” in democracy and a free-market economy. (Just as Gorbachev said in this speech I cited above: Nations must cured from their radical free-market philosophy!) And so, you had all this communist nostalgia in East Germany, in former Yugoslavia (ask the people there: most of them indeed long back for Tito!) and everywhere else. It was very diabolical. People were not just suffering, but starving in Yeltsin’s Russia. Some believe that several millions died in the process.
These are excellent points to recall.
This is also my own assessment on the “Shock Therapy” or neoliberalism which is the bastardization of capitalism from the communists. Lenin preached to his acolytes many times that they had to create ugly situations for a revolution. Lenin was frustrated that Russia was suffering many woes but not good enough misery for a revolution, so his Bolsheviks took initiative to create enough woes for a revolution. After the communists used their agents to promote neoliberalism to deindustrialize and disarm the West, they use the same fraud ideology to make capitalism looking bad. However, the evil capitalists, who are doing the loots, were actually communists. Oligarchs!
My guts tell me trump, bolsonaro, and especially now milei are such complicit strawmen.
Great article, great thoughts Jeff. And I’d like to add a comment regarding Whitney Webb, who you refer to a couple times in your latest article. She’s a bright person, but, in my opinion, she’s on the wrong end of this subject.
“The political formation behind these spiders is never really identified by Ms. Webb. Failing to show the spiders’ true allegiance, Webb cannot explain the strategy that is playing out.[iv] The explanation, of course, can be found in the writings of Golitsyn.”
I’ve said it many times after purchasing and reading Whitney Webb’s 2 book compilation in which she names names (hundreds and hundreds) but never ever comes out and says it is Communism that is the root of the problems she reveals. And, even today if you watch her interviews (which she does most with fellow Libertarians) she won’t ever mention the word communism as the root cause. It’s always “the surveillance state” the “intelligence community” Silicon Valley types who are truly responsible for all the problems she brings up to her audience(s).
Her website Unlimited Hangout touts fellow Libertarian “investigative” journalists as well as her own writings blaming the likes of an Eric Schmidt or Peter Thiel, mass surveillance corporations Palantir, Anduril, and Clearview AI of using the war in Ukraine to further their own interests regarding the surveillance state during the war (and post war at some point) and use that narrative to convince their own fans/followers to ditch support of any kind in Ukraine.
So much research by WW. She is vague and aimless in her analysis. No real insight.
Aimless is right. She’s popular with rabid Atheists, the godless, open border, dope smoking, rabid Libertarian Party faithful, who wrap themselves into supporting the fallacy that Thomas Jefferson was THE man, their hero….supposedly wasn’t religious, gave up his slaves, and portrayed a “live and let live” mentality. I asked one of these folks if they even knew that TJ actually read the Q’ran to learn of the ideology, beliefs, our U.S. enemy at the time (Barbary Pirates, ie, Muslims were attacking our merchant ships and basically stealing the goods). Study one’s enemy….Jefferson did and he sent the leathernecks, US Marines, to take care of business with that sh*t when even a President George Washington had simply paid these pirates whatever they demanded.
Honestly, after a couple years listening to the Libertarian bullsh*t politics, I determined they’re f*cking idiots and no better at having the reins of governance than anyone in our 2 major political Parties. I went to a meet and greet w Rand Paul during his failed Presidential bid years back. Stood in a parking lot late night in a major city in Missouri that night with a lot of local and State Libertarian types who passed the doobie all the while talking “liberty” and “freedom”…..been around “rabid” Libertarians in my own political circles and they play like they have the magic solutions to getting back to liberty and freedom…used to listen to Rand Paul, Tom Woods, on and on. These guys are truly riding out their own popularity from their radical, senile father, mentor, just an old out-of-touch bastard Ron Paul who (for years saddled up beside none other that Communist sympathizer Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich). Tells me all I need to know today. All these characters are communist sympathizers as much as any far left “card carrying Democrat” these days. Used to think Rand Paul was one of only a few good guys. Until Covid….he knew damn well Fauci lied before Senate subcommittee questions and not once did he ever call for his arrest. (I think it’s a felony to lie to Congress). And Rand had almost those Fauci emails early in the Covid bs. He played politics and used all that toward his own reelection efforts. Truth is, none of these legislators give one damn about any constituent in their respective State, district, right down to the local level. We are all on our own at this point.
Yes, the Libertarians are dangerous because they are ideologues. Their ideas are used to prejudge all facts and situations, so in strategic matters they get the context wrong. I met Ron Paul for coffee one afternoon I was in Houston. I was the luncheon speaker and he was the dinner speaker. He was as dogmatic and smug in his beliefs, as if no facts mattered. His ideology told him everything he needed to know. He made no comment to what I said, except to say the U.S. Government was the only real threat in the world. I believe the free economy is better than government controls, but I do not tip into the anarcho-capitalist camp Ron Paul embraces. The government is evil, and the defense of the country is bad because the military is an evil system. They think like communists when it comes to the U.S. military. So everything is this knee-jerk reaction where the U.S. Government is the worst evil in the world, because it is supposedly the wealthiest government. Since a lot of these people sympathize with the old Confederacy, and carry their resentment toward Washington as part of their general worldview. This is no time for that kind of thinking, since we could all be exterminated by one error in judgment by a statesman. Because they hate the Union, deep down, they prefer to see Russia is the victim of the U.S. Federal Goverment. In this they find common cause with the Kremlin, oddly. They really have no idea how this could all end, how they could all die.
Well said!
Webb is a niece of George Webb (says she’s residing in Chile, tends to be spotted in Florida) a spook on youtube who wears his Shin Bet insider friends on his sleeve, and with the release of the ‘gain of function GMO’ spearheaded the online narrative of [conspicuously Dutch persons, specifically orphans] UN Couriers involvement in the Fort Detrick bio-leak which precipitated Obama shutting that counter biowarfare program down for tge gnomish Italian to offshore to French built P4 labs in WHN, THEN tying these couriers’ presence at the Military Olympics pre-CV19 to being the ‘actual’ release modality [earliest entry to the USA from official sources was July 2019, last I checked] —
Suffice to say Whitney does not fall far from the tree, and has a bad habit of never linking Russia & China in her reportage on tge topic of hyper-aggressive technology & defense espionage from the Levant, especially not the 15% Jackson-Vanik USSR expatriots [she’s the presentably liberal centrist to Adam Greens overt lumpenprole racial incitement, both have been warmly welcomed on Alex Jones, the latter by Kissinger understudy and military PsyOps veteran Judeo-‘Catholic’ Cuban/Tom Clancy co-ghost writer Steve Pieczenik … both shamelessy plagiarized Brendan O’Connell, who on the other hand gets told by John McAffe “Don’t talk about Russia or the money dries up!” Whitney & Green get compensated handsomely financially and algorythmically, the other gets oblique references on Jones’ & Joe Rogan while seeking political asylum in the USA.]
Placing the Middle East block against the West furnishes a sacred calf backdoor into the post-Rumsfeld privatization drive in the defense – and specifically Cyber, “the REAL domain of POWER.” as Netanyahu – family friend of Trump’s son in law – put it in a tech conference 2019. Washington in his farewell address warned not only of party factionalism and entangling alliances but specifically favored nations– out of the top 20 positions in Manchuko Corn Pop’s administration more than 80% shouldn’t have ‘divided loyalty’. The International will recruit and insert through this ethno-religious political complex as long as so much as broaching the topic remains ‘icky’ to bourgeois false sense of propriety– the correspondence one readily draws from the most seditious Red elements in the US’ counterintelligence failures historically takes an awefully Teutonic conclusion for profiling and prophylactic action purposes, and that is BY DESIGN.
A very interesting post, Krebs.
I have seen her in an interview with Catherine Fitts articulating an anti-Israel, pro Palestinian viewpoint. That interview was prior to October 7. That interview was revealing of Whitney’s ignorance and disappointing to me.
I also recall she said her book project began due to her curiosity about Epstein and like the Octopus murder journalist Christian Hanson, her project exploded way beyond what she initially had conceived as the scope of her work.
I don’t know what her prior experience is, but this may explain her blind spots to communism.
Many of these younger people have not understood the main source of today’s disinformation: communist bloc active measures. Not knowing that, they cannot read events or understand who certain players are working for.
I also devoted a few last days to watch TikTok and for two reasons; I wanted to get acquainted with its content in a situation where this “social platform” is facing a ban in America.
What I’ve noticed that, at least 80 -85% of narrative related to the Israel’s intervention in “Palestine” is anti-Israel and barely 15-20% is pro-Israel.
Around 90% of a content is rabidly anti-American and anti-West and 10% is pro.
There is very little criticism of Russia and there is ABSOLUTELY no narrative critical to China and for very obvious reason.
Although I’m a rabid opponent of any bans and restrictions, I believe that in that case the incoming ban on TikTok is fully justified. Considering its enormous popularity, TikTok has become one of the main propaganda tools of the Chinese Communist party and its influence on the ignorant and already extensively brain washed minds of young Westerners.
Chinese Communist party is along Putinist Russia our main enemy. Allowing enemy’s propaganda tools freely operating in our countries would be like allowing propaganda tools of Nazi Germany freely operate in the countries allied against them.
Regards – Bogdan
The point that must be understood about the communist (KGB, CCP etc.) strategy to destroy the opposing systems is that they are and have been using the means capitalism offers, including access for the communists (even in secret way, and much so in the times past), to take over, buy or establish legitimate businesses in the West, including those listed on the NYSE etc., so that their power to have that much of an economic influence can and is transferred into political sphere as well, including communist agents posing as lobbyists and political consultants, and bankers and financiers and all other kinds of influential people, but the essence of their involvement is still one and the same – destruction of the liberty of conscience and liberty as such and the forceful replacement of it by the communist terror and in subversive and revolutionary way installed totalitarian atheistic tyranny.
One of such people, long-term KGB assets, is Soros, and there is no need to add more, as they are all more or less visible today.
In regards Clinton, his (and his Marxist wife too) case is evidently clear – and his visit to the USSR and communist Czechoslovakia to avoid Vietnam War draft, and his contacts with members of the CP Politburo at that time, and members of the communist military intelligence services is very well known fact.
So then what Clinton did as president, setting aside whether they already cheated to get him inside the WH, is also part of that aggressive strategy which, after they succeeded in influencing the already communist penetrated western countries to accept their fraudulent Manuilski doctrine of the “electrifying overtures and unheard-off concessions”, their KGB staged collapse of communism, then they had the door open to install their trusted and already recruited agents inside any place of influence and political power.
So then when suspecting people and witnesses that could become serious liability are eliminated, none can be surprised about the KGB efficiency, which is that much more emboldened and strengthened by many years of experience in the field of what they call active measures, and so by now they have perfected the operational procedures, and they have so much more help even from the “investigating” law enforcement and justice system, no doubt by now vastly penetrated by communist agents, including the FBI and such like agencies, so that nothing comes to proper and true conclusion, and all investigations are concluded as the article above stipulates by facts…
This in fact is the proof of the extent of communist (KGB, CCP) penetration, infiltration and takeover of various western government agencies, including intelligence services and law enforcement, and of course the military and legislature and justice and executive branches as well…BECAUSE without these essential steps the KGB Kremlin Mafia wouldn’t be able to get anywhere and you wouldn’t have communist judges and prosecutors ruining people’s lives and perverted justice without any restraints, as it is done today. There are no more substantial safeguards anymore, otherwise communist agents would by arrested in vast numbers and brought up on charges of treason and executed.
This is not pessimism, but true reality, and it has been now long decades since anything could be done about it and reverse the horrible situation as it is today.
At the end God will visit these atheistic communist servants of Satan and destroy them, once and for all, and they will truly regret the day they were born, but all this at immense price and destruction which, if people had more sense and understanding and most of all love of the truth and true justice, could have been avoided.
Churchill was an anticommunist. His Fulton speech kicked off the Cold War. As a politician he was not consistent. Of course, he made an alliance with Stalin to beat Hitler. It is hard to see what other choice he had. Yet he admitted his guilt of giving away countries to Stalin, and regretted it.
————
There should have never been cold war, but hot war against the communists, when they set their foot into Europe, outside of their (usurped by communist terror !) Russia – and Churchill and the rest of them betrayed millions of people in Eastern Europe and made them slaves of Stalin, many were imprisoned, some murdered, all private ownership was confiscated by the communists, and people who tried to escape from that stolen territory had no chance to escape as the Red Army held the checkpoints and were not allowing people to leave without special permits, and so what good does it do to “regret” and to make speeches about the Iron Curtain and then do again NOTHING else ?
Churchill was a very evil person in his deeds, because he sold the principle of truth and justice to the communists, to Stalin. He didn’t do anything to reverse it EXCEPT he made a speech in Missouri, which obviously doesn’t make him an anti-communist at all…and to sell entire free people in millions to communist murderer and Bolshevik fanatic is very evil deed which both Churchill and Roosevelt are guilty of.
Moreover, to make alliance with communists is also very evil, because to be associated with people who are murdering criminals and who have stolen and illegitimately hold political power and thus enslaved millions of their own people and have actively perverted millions of young people in their communist schools, that of itself is also a pinnacle of evil to make ANY kind of alliance with such atheistic criminals at all.
Stalin should have been stopped before he set foot with his Red Army from Russia and held there and prevented from leaving there at all – but the British were not willing to do that, nor the US military nor the European countries who were free from the Nazi dominion.
This should have been done before by diplomatic means to let Stalin know that he will be fought against if he tries to get inside the main European continent and that he will not be allowed to participate in any western alliance at all…Churchill did the opposite and accommodated Stalin with vast Eastern European territory and millions of slaves living there. That makes Churchill anything BUT anti-communist.
Szanowny Panie,
Bardzo celnie ujawnił Pan sedno mentalności gospodarza. Niewiele różni się ona od mentalności roosevelta i jemu podobnych zachodnich kreatur.
Dlatego nie można wykluczyć, że i dzisiaj “antykomuniści” amerykańscy pokroju autora tego bloga , dojdą w pewnym momencie do wniosku , że nie ma innego wyjścia , jak tylko ponownie ułożyć się z czerwonymi bandytami , by ratować USA. Oczywiście kosztem innych, na przykład narodów Europy już nie tylko Wschodniej.
Pozdrawiam Pana serdecznie
Witold z Warszawy
For those who cannot read Polish, Witold from Warsaw rebukes me as someone whose “mentality” has been revealed as “not much different than that of Roosevelt and similar Western creatures.” He imagines it possible that the author of this blog “will at some point come to the conclusion that there is no other option but to make arrangements with the red bandits again to save the USA. Of course, at the expense of others….”
When has it ever been to America’s advantage to sacrifice other countries to save itself? And when have I ever suggested this course of action? My course of action was to speak out against the communist indoctrination of undergraduates at UC Irvine. It was an obligation I especially felt toward those suffering under communism in Eastern Europe. And for that I lost my job even as the Cold War was supposedly ending. Yet Witold implies I am contemptible.
But I dearly wished for your freedom, Witold — which makes me doubly disappointed in your ungenerous comment. It would have been more pleasant to suffer a slap across the face.
Very, very stupid Witold. You are appearing on this noble website like a broken, groggy clock only to snort out your incoherent anti-American rants. By projecting your stupidity and ignorance in such a brazen way you are ridiculing and shaming the very country you claim to represent and stand for. Haven’t I explained to you that this website is populated by the supporters and friends of free Poland? Why are you coming here when there are thousands of websites with anti-Polish contents and show your intellectual prowess and your knowledge there? Haven’t I also suggested to you that you should make an attempt to learn some basic English before you pay us a visit? If you use a translator to read Mr. Nyquist’s articles why aren’t you using it to express yourself in English as well? Apparently, you are too lazy for that as well.
We can only admire Mr. Nyquist for his superhuman patience and a good will that he tolerates losers like yourself.
Obviously, I’m not speaking on Mr. Nyquist’s behalf, however we all hope that we won’t see you here again.
Therefore, I dedicate to you this beautiful song to you…
Churchill was a spineless politician who betrayed the principles of justice and truth, and thus he must never be called anti-communist, as that title has honor and truth in it and does not belong to people who pretend to have it and then do the opposite to retain or obtain it.
David Horowitz in that excerpt about his criticism of Diana West stated something that struck the point about Churchill – and perhaps something that has long been overdue – that perhaps he may have been a communist stooge, or the fellow traveler at the least.
This point is supported by the accounts of then Polish PM Stanislav Mikolajczik, who was the last democratically elected Polish Prime Minister, and his dealings with Churchill and Roosevelt and Stalin.
His book “The rape of Poland” is first hand account what that then truly Catholic country had to go through and how the British and American “democrats” have betrayed Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary etc. by allowing the Bolshevik criminal Stalin to take over vast territory of their respective countries.
This is a historical fact and one that must never be forgotten, because Churchill (ad Roosevelt) by their signatures at Yalta made nearly 30 millions (if not more) slaves of Stalin at that moment. How can this evil deed be reconciled with any positive intent on their part ?
How can the holy principle of liberty of conscience be even compared to what these 2 villains desired for their own countries, by allowing that murdering Bolshevik thug to obtain so much territory and so many people ?
NO, Churchill was a criminal in the eyes of history and helped substantially to advance the cause of Russian communism. His intention was manifestly visible and recorded by PM Mikolajczik, how Churchill threatened him (and thus the Polish people) that UK will not help if Poland refuse to give Stalin 1/3 of its territory, and that it could mean a blood bath for Poland.
Any time somebody mentions Churchill in any other way but that he was unprincipled and evil person (and how he conducted himself as the MP even many years before regarding the infamous British persecution of Ireland), this point should be made – and that it is NOT what people SAY, BUT what they DO, that matters !!!
However, to point out to the truth, Mr. Nyquist has always been bringing up the good points to expose the evils about the Russian etc. communist strategy and that it is therefore inconceivable that he would subscribe to any concessions with the communists at any time, in order to save the US – he knows that would discredit his whole life and make him just an another helper of the upcoming Russian led communist tyranny.
It is one thing to refute him on certain points, and on those points only, and another to paint him as guilty on all accounts because of one point in question. So there has to be consideration in order to state the truth and defend justice, no matter where it leads.
Churchill was up for a continuation war as Nyquist & Benesch covered in the early Cold War episode, and there was ample opportunities telegraphed in The Austrian Painter’s writings and public overtures for negotiated, separate peace with Britain– except on America’s dime, why not go full Zero Sum Game for permanently cracking Continental power in half? That is what atomic profligacy on a prostrate enemy suing for peace for more than a year was about, cementing that status quo rather than nuclear blackmailing a spent, wildly inferior Soviet horde back whence they came from, if not full 14 Points dissolution into its constituent hostage nations (Anglo-Soviet Accord, Ullman) There were longstanding Empire financial & administrative disburdening plans by Downing Street & City of London, such that mortgaging the empire for the war was a matter of indifference with Amero-anglophile elite capture in hand– wherever did those not-Fabians get the notion for orchestrated strategic decentralization for convergence ^& deception, I wonder–
Churchill pressured the Polish PM Mikolajczik to surrender one third of Poland to Stalin – and refused to help Poland to defend her homeland if Mikolajczik refused (which he was doing very categorically).
Your assertions, whatever they may mean, do not reflect the points and fact of history.
It is the Anglo-Saxon indifference and pride that rules such bad decisions and Churchill had already history of them regarding the situation in Ireland.
It is understood that it brings the notion of uncomfortable truth which then injures the pride of the nation that otherwise claims to have been on the forefront of the anti-communist fight, which claim is therefore refuted by the deeds to the contrary and by the overall indifference of the vast populus (American and British etc.), which is today demonstrated on Ukraine in some aspect.
Just because the governments spend tax money and send them to nations in need of help does not mean that the overall sentiment of the population is OK with it, including the so much so desired virtue of charity, which, to say the least, is vastly missing today, and was missing even back then.
Honest and good conscience of a man does not permit him to cause harm and even death to millions of people by signing their fate to the communist murdering monster – there is no excuse for Churchill nor for anyone who may have or does agree with his (perverted) reasons…and moral stand for justice must override all other aspects, excepting if Britain ran out of ammo or soldiers and tanks, and such like factors (which is not the case here).
On the other hand if the reason for the Yalta treason was that Churchill may have been a communist stooge or fellow traveler, infiltrated into the places of British Government, then all becomes clearer and shows the levels of communist penetration even back then, which, and to say the least, such level of communist infiltration, is that much more extensive today – and the overall resistance to it is so much more diminished by the communist infused hedonism and decadence (educationally introduced by the state run [usurped] public education system, run by the state and the communists inside it).
History teaches, but the vast number of people are still blind to it.
Bill Clinton’s communist connections – and military intel connections in the Soviet Bloc …
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/10/25/Host-family-forgot-Clintons-name-but-says-he-was-very-nice/2370719985600/
I think most folks that subscribe to this blog know that Clinton sold his soul to the Soviets/Communists long ago and all the unexplained deaths of his and his wife’s acquaintances over the years of their political careers? My money is on the fact that there was help from his “friends” the Soviets in tying up loose ends, whistleblowers over that political career. Same goes for his Marxist wife. They’re untouchable in this world, but the afterlife? Not so much.
There are two kinds of justice – the secular justice, which can be perverted and made inefficient, as the tyrants and abusers of it desire, and at their will, and the Divine Justice which can NEVER and will NEVER miss and is infinitely true and infinitely just.
That should clear up all that needs to be cleared up, but the main concern is to minimize the damage caused by these servants of Satan the communists.
——-
In that linked article about Clinton there is a clear confirmation of what Golitsyn was saying about the 1968 situation in communist Czechoslovakia, and a source familiar with that situation stated that not only the people that Clinton stayed with in Prague were hard line Stalinists, but that the son-in-law of that founding member of the Czechoslovak CP, the woman who was a very high ranking member of the Politburo, was himself a military colonel, possibly military intelligence colonel, which ties Clinton to GRU as well.
Then of course all else follows, because then his deeds for the advancement of the communist cause are well documented, including the release of the Panama Canal to the interest of the CCP-PLA company Hutchinson Whampoa, which is well documented and quite treasonous, because then all vessels going through that American built strategic canal are now subject to Chinese communist rules and control, NO MATTER what the CCP criminals promised and signed to the contrary.
Russian Bolsheviks shouldn’t be called Soviets as that term gives them somewhat legitimacy of a state authority, which legitimacy they do NOT have, because they have usurped and stolen that secular power of the state by bloody communist revolution, to install communist tyranny and nothing else, and they have used the powers of the state to murder, oppress and terrorize millions of their own people and of all the rest of the Russian Bolshevik Bloc. This is just an opinion, but one that should be seriously considered as matter of clarity and diplomatic reality.
Of course it is a well known fact that it was the Roosevelt administration which first recognized this Russian Bolshevik government as legitimate, and then the British also and so on. It is a shame of history for which millions of victims of communism are yet to pay…and much more.
When reading the essay, it was dismaying how many who were listed as “Sovietologists” completely missed the boat as far as perestroika and the “collapse of communism”. It doesn’t make sense to me. That both movements were run by communists should have been a big, red flag that something was not right here. Even before I ever heard of Golitsyn, and without the resources that Jeff has, I recognized that something was not right. This leads me to two questions:
How many of those “sovietologists” are conservative Christians? I mean who read and follow the Bible? Many are familiar with Proverbs 9:10 “The fear of the Lord is the making common of wisdom” but how many recognize that “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge”? How could they not know? That was supposedly their field of expertise.
Which leads me to the second question—how many of those sovietologists are really closet communists? Like wolves in sheep’s clothing? Pretending to be conservatives in order to lead astray those who truly are conservatives? If that’s the case, wouldn’t that make them participants in the fraud?
One of the signs for me was the fake opening up of the economy, as Bogdan mentioned, as outlined by Jeffrey Sachs.
Some academic sociologists are Marxists. But Francis Fukuyama was not one. The conservative mentality, even the Christian mentality, has been affected by Soviet and Russian active measures. Everyone has been targeted. All groups have been tricked. I know plenty of Christians who have fallen for active measures.
Over at Gateway Pundit I keep seeing idiots tell me how Putin is a Christian and is building Churches. The info I got directly from Russian Orthodox (ROC) sources is only about 10%, at most, of the country is churched, and given Putin is an inveterate liar, he is certainly no Christian. Kirill, the Primate of the ROC is a intel agent (known to the Swiss Federal Police as a KGB agent during his assignment to the world Council of Churches), with many of the older priests being KGB agents in their own right, the ROC is just as corrupt as Putin’s regime.
TGP has one of the lowest quality commentariats on the net, and their ignorance and naïveté shines brightly.
[…] https://jrnyquist.blog/2024/05/10/what-do-golitsyns-correct-predictions-tell-us/ […]
Jeff: How does the situation with Israel/Gaza fit in with the concept of Russian deception?
Why would Gaza have anything to do with it? The Arab Israeli conflict is its own thing. The Russian have taken the side of the Palestinians, but they are active infiltrating Israel as well.
How successful do you think they have been at infiltrating Israel?
My impression, from an Israeli I used to know, is that Israeli military intelligence is sound. I could be completely wrong about that, as I have no expertise on the Israeli intelligence services. The Mossad may be penetrated by the Russians, as most services are to some extent. The fact that travel between Russia and Israel requires no visa is suggestive of Russian penetration, but this is a guess. Mossad has detected KGB operations when the U.S. has not in the past, as with the Iran/Contra scandal. Russian agents have impersonated Mossad agents in false flag recruitments in the past.
Current “3 Wars Plan” by China to divide and strain American resources and public resolve against ‘forever/imperial wars’ (see Lei’s Real Talk). Red Chinese ‘plumbing’ (ersatz rocket materials) and communications equipment. 15% of the Holy Land population comprised of Soviet era Russian speakers. And tag-teaming the Houthi shipping interdiction & its effect on international trade. American military might is objectively unfathomable, but culture, public sentiment & The Dollar ‘Hegemony’ are not (good for us they’re too fond of having Sub Prime cake & eating it too, at least)
Mister Nyquist here i have the last interview of a man, Mister HG Massen, who definitley not understood Golystin. It’s unbeliavable what he is saying, starting from 1 hour 10 min. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PGniPxlvZc
Are you able to translate it into english?
I will take a look. I have watched Massen before. Obviously, there is a lot to be desired from most of the West’s counter-intelligence leaders.
You asked me a question last time, but when I went to answer it, I couldn’t find the comments field. The relevance of my posts is that the Army has been infiltrated and subverted by Satanists.
There all kinds of cults infiltrating all kinds of organizations. Why is this strategically relevant to the present discussion?
I just wanted to answer your question from the last one.
There is serious analysis and there is entertainment. Let us keep them separate if we can.
Said group is not an organizational holos– rather it runs on ‘open source software’, such that anyone – specifically government security – can form such a cell with no bona fides, moreover, to the end of catching flies and well poisoning. Its heraldry came up with various more spurious political comissar ‘anti-radicalization training for the military’ slide show images leaked in the past few years and has been pushed artificially – look here at statustical and cultural irrelevancy Superfascist boogeymen, not there at orders of magnitude greater Marxo-Islamic objective threat reality – … it repackages antinomian Left Hand Path in a hermeticist frame informed by medieval Arab & pre-‘Abrahamist’ reconstructive greco-roman astral magic, with some Niezsche & Heidegger here and there [speculative thought in Hegel which allows one to enter into Ideas in their internal necessity & essence becomes the conceptual alchemy Nigredo of Dekonstruktion with Heidegger so much Derrudean abberrant reading ado has been made over aporetic nothings.
That reference set had another public facing figure whom then interpolated National Socialist content – what bigger spook & scarecrow – and gained infamy moving to the Middle East to fight the ‘Magian World Order’ [inside semantic baseball: ‘magian’ was a common slur for Christian Europeans] in the 80s/90s. What before was more an Arnold Toynbe historical Aeon progression narrative becomes more Oswald Spengler– and the usual Grand Conspiracy angle is taken to be not Jews in particular but the ‘Abrahamist’ alien overlay of ‘false consciousness’ retarding a Might is Right acension to Kardeshev I planetary dominion by the West, and beyond for a ‘new space imperium aeon’.
In short: NATO BAD AND ‘MAGIAN’ SAY JEW/CHRISTIAN — but not and never Communism. The frequency of anti-NATO mentions in the ‘canon’ texts is comical and goes to show what and whom it ultimately serves and benefits. Regarding the ComIntern context: sensationalist fear mongering so idiots have an explicit occassion to scream SATANIC FASCIST conspiracy converging government & civil society, not Reds. In its own terms, it is a devilishly clever ‘exposure therapy’ whose ultimate object Nigredo-ficates what was a potential hard liner natural enemy of leftisms by encouraging them to LARP or CosPlay ‘infiltration’ into ‘Magian’ institutional roles and professions.
That said, cults like Keith Raniere & The Bronfman Seagram’s heuresses (former a personal aquaintance of Bill & Hillary) or the one that elected a head of state in South Korea 2016 are far more present active measures threats– this sort of thing simply isn’t realistic from amateurs, without state backing or incitement at any rate.
I don’t think there is a question that the US Military has been infiltrated and subverted. Beyond the wokesters, It’s hard to tell who is responsible. I tell kids to stay far away from the military. It simply is not worth the sacrifice required when you are serving a regime that itself is anti-American.
As for the dissolution of the Soviet Union:
“When weak act strong – when strong act weak.” –Sun Tzu
If Clinton is a Communist, why didn’t he give Europe to Russia?
If Russia were sincere, why not let European’s vote to join the Soviet Union?
I’m surprised that Clinton didn’t take the opportunity to sell Russia, Castle Grande.
The answered this.
I never read W. Webb book, but I spotted her and watch/read its web site for like 9-4 months, eventually I concluded she is playing the disinfomation card as an “onest anti-system” journalist, but in reality is a distraction-repetor. Her website articles are not proving much, are tipical conspirationist descriptions trying to present connections with 1 proven fact and 100 unproven claims. Never read the book.
Also very important: she repeats in her book false informations about FBI director Hoover – this was also spotted by DIANA WEST, who also wrote some articles on her website on the topic of Hoover. In other words Diana West showed that WW was spreading disinfo, the kind that come from KGB, that was like 1 year ago.
Also she is involved with repeating pro-free-Palestine-anti-israel propaganda.
And first time i heard of WW was on corbert report – another disinfo anti system repetor of comunist propaganda.
Somehow, this disinfo-repetor got into Glenn Beck with 1 hour interview, and now got attention from JR Nyquist !!!!!!!!!
….
Correction: 1) 3-4 months,
2) Diana West wrote on Diana West website
3) WW is repeating anti-Israel propaganda
She gets attention because she has noted some important things, but she completely misinterprets the facts and does get some facts wrong. This is typical.
Mr Nyquist – is CIA and MI5/6 got penetrated as u discussed with A. Benech. how about Mossad / Shin bet … or France services ? can u have a show on this topic?
All these services have their own scandals and penetrations. Especially the French. Israel is particularly vulnerable.
What made Golitsyn think that the Sino-Soviet split would result in the West building China into a superpower? Just because Kissinger might have leaked his plan to Russia, doesn’t make that an easy accomplishment. To jump to the conclusion that, that would occur, is more than a stretch. In retrospect, it sounds more like the same sort of intentional foreshadowing that has been placed in the media for decades, about events which eventually develop. Like X Files episodes, for instance. Of course Chris Carter has said that the CIA has given him script suggestions from time to time.
You’re quoting from the X-files?
Alex Jones shows X Files episode which forecast Covid. Chris Carter told Jones that the reporter in the episode was based upon him.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/covid-19-vaccine-triggers-hiv-infection-warns-cdc-whistleblower/
Here you are quoting Alex Jones and Chris Carter, then. Is that where you’re coming from?
This is one of our resident trolls.
Yes he is.
The X Files link came after the original linked vid from the US Army. The point is that “THEY” whomever that is, usually inform the public about what’s about to happen, in similar principal to a shyster placing a dinky classified ad in a local free advertiser rag, informing the small readership of a sleazy deal in the works. Movies that came out first after the Covid lockdowns, were especially dismal. Civil War is the latest; even the trailers are depressing yet neither likely nor plausible. Just pulling wings off flies. Communist Russians, of course, are behind the Satanic infiltration of the US Army along with Hollywood.
Alex Jones is the Court Jester. He’s in on the gag, and the only one who the King allows to critique him. There’s some sort of code that “THEY” seem to follow, which obligates them to disclose their pending intended actions. This is similar in principal to the shyster who places a dinky classified ad in the back of a local free advertiser rag, to disclose the dirty deal that’s about to go down. The movie Civil War, is an example of what they want people to worry about. It’s not going to happen. THEY won’t allow that. All they want is for Antifa and the Proud Boys to rumble on Federal property as pretext to declare knockdowns.
The problem you have, Mel, is that you have no coherent idea as to who “THEY” are. I am telling you that “THEY” are the communist movement — what Senator Joseph McCarthy called “the communist conspiracy.” As a dupe of false and vague conspiracy theories, Jones cannot lead anyone out of the wilderness of mirrors. He keeps them in that wilderness, where he and his listeners are forever lost.
Why do Satanic Communists follow such a code to make obfuscated disclosure? Are they afraid of getting a worse room in Hell?
You should read Golitsyn. He shows how the Communist ran disinformation operation after disinformation operation, learning and implementing lessons learned from each one to build even bolder operations, and also how from each deception, myriad others were spawned, and how smaller scale operations led up to the grand Sino-Soviet split.
You clearly haven’t read him, or are trying to undermine him.
Also, the strategic disinformation operations all had their foundation in the New Economic Policy, which allowed Russia to gain economic strength.
Yes!
Maybe I can be of encouragement here for anyone who maybe hasn’t read Golitsyn yet.
I really wanted to read him for awhile, but I also work on houses as my livelihood, and have somewhat of a small farm and other responsibilities, so oftentimes -especially in the summer- I am pretty mentally drained in the evenings, and you definitely need your mind to be able to focus when reading Golitsyn.
I had read that it took him some 20 years to put together New Lies for Old. But in all actuality, it was the result of more years than that, because it had to take him awhile once he had decided to defect to put so much to memory (at the same time working out how he was going to defect).
I read over halfway through New Lies for Old several times, but the aforementioned work load would cause me to have to set it down for awhile, to the point that I started over several times before finally completing it fir the first time in recent months.
However, that starting over several times helped me begin to retain some of it, as will subsequent readings.
Golitsyn had a very disciplined mind, and thus a very strong intellect. There is no wasted or superfluous sentence, no personal grab for fame. Every sentence is well-thought-out, and the result of years of observing and thinking.
So, he is challenging to read -not because his work is dull!- but because most are not used to reading such information-condensed book. So, it can be challenging to keep on, especially as he speaks of things the reader at first may not be familiar with, and he definitely looks at it from a perspective that Westerners have not had, pursued, or developed though Golitsyn is clear that the outward evidence of continued Communist bloc coordination was always there, in spite of their rhetoric and games painting a picture of disunity, conflict, liberalization, and nationalism.
So, take it from me. If I can hang on and learn Golitsyn’s work more and more, then anyone who reads this blog can.
The man performed an exceedingly valuable service to the West, and yet how many are aware of him or have ignored his work? We’ve done it to our own peril.
P.S. Always have a pen in hand when reading Golitsyn.
Jeff, not sure if you can comment, have you seen this video, the person talks about how Russia has been using Ukraine as a dumping ground for their provocateurs and using controlled opposition as a strategy in the Ukraine as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlI35JIPR8Y
I’ll also add it’s very similar to what China has been doing with Hong Kong as well
Very interesting, Alex.
Whitney Webb goes on Glenn Beck and she’s somehow “credible”??? I watched that interview. Glenn Beck carries water for the Republican Party, come election time, same as the late Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and on and on. None of these individuals know of the grand strategy of the Soviets in the early 80’s.
So, Whitney does the same old song and dance today…. Blame the security state, intelligence community….never mentions the “C” word. 😂 😂 😂
The blame the security state that is protecting them, not realizing it is infiltrated as well as besieged by a mortal enemy.
Jeff,
Just finished the documentary about Kennedy. I learned so much from that. Thank you. You have me on reading and watching documentaries about intelligence ops … overdrive. I watched the Korean and Vietnam episodes with Alex. Will make a separate comment later on TET.
I also agree with you that Golitsyn must be read by our leaders and by concerned citizens, especially those who think Putin is a Christian.
I just watched the Octopus murders. That was fascinating because I remember the Danny Cassalaro story when it happened years ago.
Now I am reading Blacklisted by History about McCarthy….so many historical documents pertaining to Communist infiltration are missing. Love to know your opinion of that book. Thank you for making my head spin.
I have great respect for Stan Evans. His research on the real story of Joseph McCarthy is amazing. I knew they had been unfair to McCarthy, but Evans adds such shocking detail that I could not put the book down. You say to yourself, “Of course. This is how they do it.” Everyone felt obligated to attack McCarthy, even conservatives. And most still do. The man was destroyed. It was complete. He is the main villain in all our history textbooks. I know because those textbooks were what I taught history out of in the 1980s. But then I recalled the same thing happened to me in teaching, and in graduate school. You were not allowed to tell the truth about communism. One professor said to me, “You don’t belong here. Why don’t you go into the private sector?” You put years of your life into something, and they blacklist you. And for what? Because you thought Marxism was subversive and dangerous and un-American? Think of the hypocrisy. It was awful for McCarthy to destroy someone’s career (though it did not happen like that), but they can do it and it’s justified! Of course, that’s how things work. Why didn’t other politicians rally around him? Why didn’t anyone in academia defend me? A troubling question.
‘One professor said to me, “You don’t belong here. Why don’t you go into the private sector?”‘
@JRNyquist: He(?) was mocking you, yes? I know that you did not want to be part of them, but, all the same, that must have been quite humiliating, when that was said to you.
—-
‘You put years of your life into something, and they blacklist you’.
☹️
It was not humiliating at all. It was an arrogant remark by someone so assured of his rightness, yet so wrong, and so immature in his opinions, that I lost all respect for him. He was a famous anti-Soviet person, in fact, a dissident who considered himself a socialist in the Swedish mold. But he was merely a shallow member of the Useful Idiot Denomination. He ran for president of a former Soviet Republic in 1992 and when his opponent was accused as a KGB agent, he was so outraged at the supposed McCarthyism of the accusation, he quit the election in favor of his opponent. Is it not incredible? His name was Rein Taagapera, if I remember the spelling correctly. I studied under him in 1988.
I misread that whole scenario–I apologize. I hope that I did not offend or insult you.
Hi Jeff… another masterful article that the heads of the CIA and FBI, etc, need to read and understand and then act on appropriately. Of course, since they’re compromised, they won’t admit that Golitsyn was correct. But you’re beating the drum and it’s very wonderful and important that you continue to do so. At some point, perhaps things will turn around.
By the way, I sent you a couple of emails about getting your permission to use one of your comments in an article I’m writing. Not sure if you saw them. 🙂
Thank you, Peter. You can quote me as much as you like in your article. Sorry if I missed your emails. I get so many junk emails I sometimes miss the good ones — like yours.
Thank you, Jeff! I’ll post the link in a comment when it’s done.
Not sure if this comment got lost, so sending it again…
Hi Jeff… another masterful article that the heads of the CIA and FBI, etc, need to read and understand and then act on appropriately. Of course, since they’re compromised, they won’t admit that Golitsyn was correct. But you’re beating the drum and it’s very wonderful and important that you continue to do so. At some point, perhaps things will turn around.
By the way, I sent you a couple of emails about getting your permission to use one of your comments in an article I’m writing. Not sure if you saw them. 🙂
Hi Jeff… I left a positive (of course! :-)) comment a bit ago, but it didn’t show up. The first one was while I was logged in to WordPress. Then I left a slightly revised comment after logging out. It said it was sent, but it didn’t display the way they have been previously. I wonder if it’s the same bug we ran into when I first left a comment on your blog (last year?).
Just wanted to let you know.
Peter
I will check the spam log. Sometimes it hides posts there for some odd reason.
Here’s my comment… I’ll leave it again, since my one above showed up.
=====
Hi Jeff… another masterful article that the heads of the CIA and FBI, etc, need to read and understand and then act on appropriately. Of course, since they’re compromised, they won’t admit that Golitsyn was correct. But you’re beating the drum and it’s very wonderful and important that you continue to do so. At some point, perhaps things will turn around.
By the way, I sent you a couple of emails about getting your permission to use one of your comments in an article I’m writing. Not sure if you saw them. 🙂
I did find the original and it should post above. Yes, please quote me in your article as needed. Perhaps you could link the article here for all to read.
Thank you, Jeff!!! Yes, I’ll put the link here or if comments are turned off by that time, in the next article. Sorry for all the duplicates! I guess they all finally showed up. Oy! 🙂
Greyknight- Would you elaborate on the strategic disinformation operations all had their foundation in the New Economic Policy, which allowed Russia to gain economic strength. I am interested. Thanks
CMA,
Golitsyn gives a good description of the NEP and what it accomplished early in the book.
Through strategic deception, the West was led to believe that the Bolsheviks’ ideology was losing hold over the new government, and that a moderation of the ideology was developing. That a measure of capitalism was being restored. That the West shouldn’t be hostile to the Soviet government, but rather recognize and trade with it to encourage the growing moderation. They downplayed referrals to violence; they promoted “peaceful coexistence”, and disarmament.
All this and more, Golitsyn brings out in the section where he describes the NEP.
He then reveals how the Communist bloc leadership studied the NEP in developing their new long range policy in the period from 57-60.
All of the elements I mentioned and more are seen in each disinformation operation Golitsyn describes.
The NEP was a key foundational element in developing the new long range policy, which then guided all of the disinformation operations.
In each operation, the West was led to think there were genuine rifts in the Communist bloc, and within the Soviet Union itself. The operations led to the West trading and having diplomatic relations with some of the bloc nations, just as the NEP had the same effect for the Bolsheviks.
The disinformation operations led to successful united front attempts, similar to agents of the Trust generating anti-Bolshevik groups abroad.
The disinformation operations eventually led the West to disarmament, even as the NEP tamped down Western alarm at the Bolshevik threat.
All this and more is brought out throughout Golitsyn’s work.
I hope I haven’t been confusing, as I am still a student of Golitsyn.
Thank you. I too have started and stopped reading Golitsyn (not getting far at all). This has piqued my interest and you given me the bigger picture. I am getting back to the book. Maybe Jeff should do an on going series on this book, breaking it down chapter by chapter.
CMA, Just stay with it. A section each night. Contemplative Observer’s website has a good breakdown of it too if you want to read it. I will find the link.
https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/category/anatoliy-golitsyn/
P.S. i know most on here, especially Jeff, can answer this much better than I. I was just taking it as an opportunity to see if I could articulate some of what I have been able to learn.
That should have been ” *penetrating* anti-Bolshevik groups abroad.”
I see no evidence that Putin is a Marxist/Communist nor is he attempting to spread his ideology, whatever it is; around the globe. The Marxist/Communists are is DC, The City of London, Geneva, and Davos.
Putin is not spreading his ideology for two a very important reason. Marx and Lenin expressly stated that communism is not an “ideology.” It is the science of managing mankind’s affairs. And the best way you can do that is with deception…. You will have nothing and you will be happy IS Marxism. He spreads communism through agents in the West like Klaus Schwab. Khrushchev said that they would feed us communism little by little until we became communists without even realizing it. To help this process along the Soviet Union was disassembled. It caused them some trouble, but it worked admirably. And if you are watching, Putin’s armies are putting up statues of Lenin and Soviet flags in conquered Ukrainian territory. And if you bothered to follow Putin closely, you would know that he has said he is a “Christian,” and he added that Christianity is the same as Leninism. He has also said that he never burned his Party card because he liked communist ideas. He gave a speech to the World Festival of Youth and Students, the largest communist youth organization on Earth, on the anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, and said he was with them, that he believed in them. He gives free grain to communist Cuba, is building bases for communist Nicaragua, has sent troops to communist Venezuela, is allied with communist China…. Must I go on?
Incidentally, your longer replies–like this one–is the main reason that I read the comments. It brings things together for me.
Also, in “Big Intel”, Gary Waller says that, in the U.S., Marxism has gained sufficient mass and momentum (my terms) and no longer requires infusions from Moscow.
The dream of final dictatorship has yet to be realized in America. How can this happen without Russian and/or Chinese intervention.
If Biden, the Democrats, and most Republicans, are all being blackmailed, threatened, and brainwashed by Russia and China, then what’s the hold up? Why can’t they just shove through a dictatorship? Americans are busy and distracted, but they’re armed to the teeth, and they aren’t extremists either any one way or another. That’s just big corporate media propaganda. Is it still legal to call lies, propaganda, or vice versa?
Please do not exaggerate the number of people blackmailed, or the efficiency of that blackmail. A Russian defector once told me they are very careful not to make overt blackmail threats to friends in high places. One needs subtlety.
Take for instance the Antifa Jihadis who riot at UCLA. Why did they riot there in particular. The news stated that they weren’t even students. Was that factual reporting? How were the reporters able to make that determination? I never read any substantiation of that as a matter of fact. My guess is that if they weren’t current students, they were grads or dropouts from UCLA.
I was enrolled at Portland State University in a course of the Conflict Resolution program. The non tenured professor, Tom Hastings, is still there after so many years.
He had informed the class of an upcoming protest downtown, and offered us extra credit if we were to participate.
The point is that the news covers the riots on college campuses, as if everyone in the country is like these extremists. This sort of showbiz doesn’t make anyone want to go out and do this sort of thing, except other useful idiots who’ve attended these captured schools.
Why is Tom Hastings still employed at Portland State University, with nothing but bad reviews? His department remains merely adjunct, and he still is without tenure.
https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/professor/569113
Extremists? Read about the new FBI. Their new mission is to *impose change* in conformance with Critical Theory, DEI and the Frankfurt School.
To the FBI, the traditional American is, by definition, an extremist.
The communists have infiltrated the FBI. That is one of their achievements.
@Jeff Nyquist: We should not forget Friedrich Engels as well. He was the big investor behind Marx. Using his enormous wealth in textile industry, Engels was much more perceptive than Karl Marx, especially in his predictions of WW1 which were on par with Golitsyn in accuracy. Engels represented the class of world elites, who explore other possibilities beyond capitalism. He bankrolled Marx to write the philosophical ideology to galvanize cabals of capitalists at the time to invest into communism. The very reason why Lenin (his family was wealthy as well) rose to power in Russia was due to Lenin’s persuasive power to convince the world elites to bankroll him. Today, you can see why our capitalists are addicted to Russia and China because the so-called communism is so effective that you enslave cheap labor and use money printing machines without responsibility. In communism, capitalists just found an infinite money glitch. They will never have to worry about cyclical boom and bust of capitalism when socialism and communism will inflate those losses away and workers will suck up to become slaves.
@MEL HOLLIER: Because there are two things that prevent the communists from completely controlling the worlds.
– Factions. Every communist has an ugly problem with internal fighting. They disagree with each other on what visions of communism to implement. After they successfully weakened the West with neoliberalism, the communists still found themselves in the quagmire of factionalism.
– Burdens of huge population on welfare. The USSR realized its systems being not usable due to the burdens of paying socialist welfare for everyone. Even if they took over the world, they still had a responsibility to implement social welfare. If the population, who subscribed to communism fanatically, becomes disillusioned. These people will be the worst enemies for the ruling elites. Yuri Bezemov said precisely that ideological fanatics will be the first ones being executed after global communism.
With this statement, you again out yourself as a troll, XENO MAN.
There are no legitimate factions within the Communist bloc and parties.
55merc
Putin in his own words:
“You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,” Putin said, referring to the KGB.
“I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity,” he said. “I liked Communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”
Jeff wrote this piece several years ago and there are links at the end for further reading and inspection. There’s more quotes from Putin himself stating he’s a card carrying Communist.
http://jrnyquist.com/is-putin-a-communist.html
His KGB years of service excluding, which he has demonstrated in Ukraine as useful (including bulldozer bodies of murdered civilians in a trench before Ukrainian Catholic Church). So just because Putin kissed once or twice on TV one of the Russian Icons does not make him Catholic, and his KGB past is with him in his communist minds and deeds of evil. And his ties and schemes with the CCP criminals are probably no evidence to blind people or provocateurs either, evidently.
In fact, you are saying that communism is more a structure, a form to put humankind in a big box than ideas. It means that communists don’t really know what they do, they ‘ve got an aim: to controll everything and then, they ‘ll get the ideas. But if it’s their way of doing, they’ll collapse at the end because it’s an empty shell. So, they ‘re not so smart but they are sufficiently nasty to destroy lots of our foundations.
The philosopher Eric Voegelin once likened Karl Marx to a magician whose trick bag appeals to alienated people. These alienated people, on joining the communist movement, cannot effect mankind’s liberation, as they hope. They can only perfect a system of enslavement and destruction. Those who lead communism tend to have a criminal psychology. They love power and victimizing others for its own sake. The communist dream crowns them because they grasp its destructive possibilities.
From properly Hegelian speculative reason which gains purchase on Ideas from the inside out (including an apodictic intersubjectively verifiable & absolute ethical ground, in which each soul is a qualitative infinity obliging recognition) Marx’s ersatz Absolute is constituted by the the totality of all human subjects, which cannot have like unto godlike repose until all have the material conditions of bondage removed— any obstruction to this corporate & corporeal perfection is of infinite devaluation, as if they were an empty husk haunted by ‘false consciousness’ . . . Man was Man by dint of soul essence as evinced by Jesus, and counterposed by the Universal, Absolute Infinite of God … Now he is only present company to & for Man in General, and commensurately disposable as one of the Supreme Many.
— The appeal begins and ends with what Hegel defined as the Absolute Finite – Man – and the alienated person whom relates to himself as beholden (to corporeal, mutible existence, homunculus persona) to contingency and only conceives of his temporality in animalistic and serial fullfilment of want, lack of need or care. From the inconmeasurability of the perspectival modality of the knower, the Ego, one can fall into the trap of treating everything & everyone as absolutely Other, alien alterities— an artistic pose articulated well in art, which an form a window betokening such depths — and taken to pathological final extreme, the Negative or False Infinite (interminable suffering apart from self, soul, God, their ground of being and duration through becoming in Logos, eternal Spirit)
Marx had to devote a tome’s worth of material to Max Stirner’s Egoism in The German Ideology because it put paid to the scientistic pablum and moralizing cant of all Socialisms in actually consistent (if deviating) Hegelian systematic terms. Amorality and egoistic volontarist/syndicalist aside, the utilitarian and consequentialist outcome results in “the last communist strangled with the guts of the last democrat.” As Hans Hoppe put it.
This Negative Infinite as embodied in a manichean, dissociative psyche can approach anything As-If (e.g. Hans Vaihinger’s Pholosophie Als Ob, hence the Neo-Kantian turn among Reds at the time)— they are somnambulist bodies ready to be snatched by this totalizing system of Enframent, because they are zealots in wait of a Cause to proxy that infinite chasm of separation from recognition of the True Infinite, that alterity we truly find home and substantial fellow-feeling with: God, and the moral community of souls. . . . A lot of work for nothing, but one arrogates for one’s self indulgence for indulgence, something for nothing; it’s not as though one will ever answer to a higher power for one’s historical materialist node in the Beast System blockchain, after all.
Interesting analogy.
My reply was in response to @JRNyquist, not the other user who chimed in later.
I would respectfully disagree. Communism is a system of language, which allows evil people to hide in plain sight using terms intentionally designed to confuse, trick, and obfuscate. It is the concealing system of language that Marx pioneered that was revolutionary, but what made it truly diabolical was that it was the perfect opposite of the truth, and thus perfectly evil people can posture as perfectly righteous.
It is a system of empowerment which the most evil people in any given society can use to attack, defame, criticize, and ultimately murder the most righteous people. There is nothing accidental about communism’s success and Marx was a genius of sorts. What he birthed was in my belief the apotheosis of evil, it’s most powerful final form, which presents itself as its exact opposite, as perfect righteousness.
What this means is that a nation ruled by communism is a nation with a hierarchy of the MOST evil at the top, with the most righteous at the bottom, arrested, enslaved, tortured, and killed. It’s ultimate goal is a worldwide federation of these nations, ultimately joined together in one pyramid of power with the most evil men on the planet at the top.
There are practical reasons as to how the filtration mechanism works that explicitly engineers only the most evil men to rise to the top within any communist organization, which are too long to get into, and which filter out and eject any man with any shred of a conscience whatsoever. One example of this is that a Communist must pledge essentially his entire soul to the org, he must pledge that he is willing to commit any act for them, and he must pledge complete obedience to any commands passed down from above. This is known as “Party discipline” and one of the ways that they mold the slaves in the organization.
It is the use of opposite language that is the magic of Marxism, that constantly confuses people, so that they do not understand it’s true danger. All communists learn this technique of violating language this way, of reversing the truth, it is not a byproduct, but the very essence of the dark magic that deceives and confuses the human minds they seek to rule over. Jeff talked once about their “code” and they indeed speak in code, using one word that has a minimum of two definitions, thus being able to communicate with fellow criminals openly, with outsiders unable to comprehend. I was delighted to hear him reference this code language and hope to hear more from him on it. One word, two definitions. Take the word “the bourgeousie” and simply substitute “democracy”. Take the word “communist” and substitute “totalitarian criminal”. Take the word “the proletariat” and change it to “our criminal gang”. Read Marx again and now you can see what the inside gang knew what they meant when they communicated with each other.
“We must overthrow [democracy] with [our criminal gang] to establish a [totalitarian criminal] dictatorship”.
Few will believe me when I say this. This is why the classes themselves are meaningless, or debating about economics regarding Marx is meaningless. These were abstractions and terms used to speak in code AND simultaneously to hide behind as pretending to represent. Substitute “the bourgeousie” for “whiteness”, “the patriarchy”, “white supremacy”, “heteronormativity”, “cisgenderism”, “misogyny”, etc..
The term is the code to be able to plan openly. There are other aspects to the reasons for using these specific abstractions, but none of this is accidental. Marxism is a science to allow evil intelligent men to gain power. Do not fool yourself that they do not know what they are building and working towards: a worldwide federation of totalitarian criminal dictatorships.
Perseus: it looks as if both you and Jeff are correct. Communism appeals to alienated people, and it is a system of language. Alienated people tend to be attracted to language that gives them a sense of power over those who don’t understand it. Yet the double speak of language frees them to be the devils they want to be. There I see both the criminal psychology and the perversion of language.
On a side note, communist systems are known for their corruption. The criminal psychology inevitably leads to corruption.
Corrupt thinking leads to corrupt actions. Yes!
Perseus,
In other words, we have focused too much their obfuscating, distracting arguments and words, and not on their *deeds*, correct? This is one of the lessons I think Golitsyn teaches.
Kennedy got whipped by Khruschev in a battle of words in Vienna.
They are masters of deception.
Of course, once one is familiar with their deceptive code language, then you can learn a lot about them too as you clearly demonstrated, and as Contemplative Observer demonstrated with his quotes of Gorbachev.
I wasn’t disagreeing with Jeff, btw, but with the person who said “communists don’t really know what they do”. At the bottom levels, they may be pure suckers, but at the top, they are pure evil. This is what Manning Johnson realized once her got to the Central Committee. All of a sudden the types of people changed and he was dealing with stone-cold, psychopathic monsters who discussed the pros and cons of “martyrdom” of the black masses they were exploiting. If I recall a moment correctly, they were even joyful about the Scottsboro case because of how it could be exploited for their purposes.
It gets even creepier when you see some of their brainwashing material which uses crimes they commit in order to pin on others. If you understand what you are watching, you realize they are so evil they can produce material displaying the emotional reaction to their evil, designed to milk the maximum sympathy possible, about an event which they themselves committed, which displays a self-awareness of their evil, which reveals that not only do they know what they are doing, but they are so conscience-less they can use their own crimes for a further benefit of smearing their enemies in a double whammy.
Benjamin Gitlow, an American communist leader said the same thing. He said that rank and file communists were sweet people. The leaders, he said, were “sharks.”
Well, yes, communism effected what Devereux called the work of the Id and of the Super-ego in concert.
The Id will coax one to irrational self-harming acts using a pseudo-logic borrowed from the Super-ego. Meanwhile the Super-ego will ironically use irrational filthy language to strike at an ego following the id – in the advance of a rational goal or restraint.
Communist scissor strategy is indeed this sort of controlled opposition on both side, good cop and bad cop, using a double language that contradicts its statements with its body language , its goals with its reasonableness, so to speak.
I never thought to use Freud to explain Golitsyn.
P.S.S.:
If it weren’t for Jeff Nyquist’s tremendous work, I would have never known of Golitsyn. I’ve said it before, but thank you, Jeff, for all you have done in trying to warn your countrymen and get them to think or rethink, as the case may be. I also wouldn’t have come across Contemplative Observer, or Trevor Loudon, or several of the books I have seen Jeff reference or recommend, which in turn leads to other books.
I personally place the Holy Bible above all else in my life, and God’s wisdom sheds light even on dealing with Marxism. As Solzhenitsyn said, Russia succumbed to it basically because they forgot God.
But, in my opinion, Golitsyn is a must read, and reread, and reread, as much for a president, legislator, judge, governor, foreign diplomat, as for a military officer, intelligence official, right down to an informed citizenry.
Jeff, your work has accomplished something with me. Your many essays have helped shed light on so many issues. I regularly share your essay, “The Subversion of the Not-So-Innocent” with others. Also the one in which you summarized how the Marxists infiltrated so many Islamic groups via their infiltration of and war in Afghanistan.
Of course, I regularly send out your newest essays, but I send those two out often.
Also, Contemplative Observer’s paper on Obama’s presidency, “Forward, Contades, Not Back!”, gets sent out regularly, followed by “Obama’s Big C Communists are Back, and Back to Stay”.
I refer people regularly to New Lies for Old. It’s a tough read at first, but if people will stay with it, they will not regret it.
Contemplative Observer’s piece is “Forward *Comrades*, Not Back”
Rendezvous with death was good. Honestly, there really does have to be something wrong with RFK Jr’s brain. He said that he looked at all of the evidence and decided that the mafia did it. Also, Sam Halpern saying that Fidel was a good guy and they broke bread together. RFK Jr. going to Cuba and meeting Fidel, his mom was a big fan of Che Guevara and met with Fidel several times. Is this some form of Stockholm syndrome or can they really not connect the dots?
Rendezvous With Death is excellent work! It is a must share.
RFK junior’s attitudes are shocking.
Trump’s insistence that he saved billions of lives by eliminating FDA protocols for the Covid shots is genocidal. Kennedy’s views might be shocking to someone who never lived through the sixties through today, but I doubt if he’s going to rule by executive order. I think Kennedy will let the Legislature do it’s job, but he will be good for the debate.
The thing that bothers me about environmental lawyer RFK, Jr is that he still holds to the global warming/climate change agenda/hoax. And his stance is the same as every Democrat President in my lifetime…to add more and more regulations that curb logging, oil drilling, and mining. As Jimmy from Brooklyn said in the interview above, the Communists have succeeded in killing America’s energy sector by design.
It really doesn’t matter that the voting machines are rigged, when there’s nobody worth voting for, anyway. Can anyone here think of anyone in the United States who would make a good, president? They might be from the private sector, the arts, church, if not government. The Bible doesn’t advocate elections. It prescribes finding the best man for the job, and drafting him.
You have made this last statement about finding the right man and drafting him before, just under a different troll name. Why some of your drivel and patterns stick in my mind is beyond me.
I will defend Kennedy as his environmental litigation. He never sued over bogus global warming. He sued over rivers catching fire from chemical pollution. Who here is in favor of polluted rivers?
California Governor, Gavin Newsom, has mandated for no new gasoline powered cars by a few years from now. Problem is, there are not enough charging stations for EVs, electric cars weigh so much that parking structures are collapsing, and the batteries can’t hold a charge in cold weather. People are already scraping their expensive electric cars, if they aren’t being repossessed for missed payments. So, by the time that gas cars are illegal, battery cars will all be in the junk yard. The plan is for nobody to have their own car, or be able to go anywhere that public transportation won’t take a citizen who has enough social credits to qualify for a ride.
Everyone’s an expert. Have YOU looked at ALL the evidence? Let’s see it. Bring it to Court.
Watch the documentary posted here on the site. Please say why you disbelieve the testimony.
Must be somebody either from the Russian embassy or Hong Kong…or perhaps somebody that provokes and does not have the answer either…typical.
I was responding to:
brcc661 says:
May 12, 2024 at 5:47 pm
The difficulty I have with the documentary is that I have not seen all the unreleased JFK files, and the movie is cherry picked evidence. There’s no independent cross examination by anyone who has seen the entire JFK file. There might well be exculpatory evidence, but how are we to know if there is or not? From the very beginning of the documentary, it starts out as a hatchet job. If Oswald was the sole culprit, this prejudicial presentation ought to clear him. It tries too, hard to make the audience feel negatively towards Oswald with minimal exposition, as if a melodrama. Obviously, Oswald was up to no good. There’s no need to demonize him. There’s nothing good about him. It’s like the movie is an answer to someone trying to say that Oswald was innocent. It’s like Stormy Daniels accusing Trump of rape, at a trial for financial fraud. Nobody is saying that Oswald wasn’t there with a gun or had no prior knowledge of the assassination, so why try so hard to make him look like the bad guy which he obviously is?
Maybe if there were a bullet list of points made in the documentary, it would be easier to separate the facts from the melodrama. Please at least explain how the documentary proves, PROVES, that Oswald was the Lone Gunman.
Jeff, if that “documentary” claims that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman, why waste my time on it. According to a lawyer on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvgT4rvQH1g a parafin test came up negative that Oswald had fired a single shot that day. Secondly all the physical evidence indicates that JFK was killed by a shot from in front. So why waste my time on obvious fiction?
The problem with the physical evidence is that it tells us very little—who pulled the trigger, his motivation, his connections, who was above him, etc. We need evidence from other sources to fill in those blanks. Jeff in a previous essay tied Castro to the killing with help from the KGB, but there are several details that are missing. I expect that we will never know those details.
To sum up, the physical evidence is that JFK was dead, shot from in front. That’s it. Anything beyond that is conspiracy theory, unless there is solid evidence from other sources.
Now to have someone with the stature of RFK-Jr pushing conspiracy theory blaming the U.S. government, is not good.
RO: Physical evidence tells us a great deal. More important is the biography of Oswald and his wife’s background. What will it hurt you if you watch the documentary? Try having an open mind. That documentary will educated you on something very important. I wrote on this last year, and I have recommended this documentary before, and Posner’s book. Please read it, along with the other book on Oswald and Marina I have mentioned, written by a friend of theirs. I think you are missing out on some very interesting details becaue you have made up your mind without considering both sides of the question.
Jeff: “More important is the biography of Oswald and his wife’s background.”
You and I have different scales of importance. What you consider is more important I consider as unimportant if it contradicts physical evidence. Your background in history and political science. My background is in the physical sciences. I find you as an important source of information when you talk within your expertise. But here you are outside your expertise. I have looked at all the physical evidence I can find, even watched videos that you recommended, and I have found not a shred of physical evidence that backs up the claim that Oswald fired a single shot that day. Rather all the evidence I have seen indicates that the shot that blew out JFK’s brains came from in front. Biographies can be falsified, made up. Physical evidence can be planted to be found after the fact, like Oswald’s rifle and the “magic bullet” which defies all known physical laws. The Zapruder film, the Parkland MDs’ testimonies of what they observed, the witnesses who reacted to hearing a shot from in front, where pieces of JFK’s scull and brain were found, all point without contradiction to a shot from in front.
The problem with the physical evidence is that it leads only so far. In this case, it doesn’t answer the who and why. The conspiracy theories, including the Warren Report, try to answer the who and why. All physical evidence can do is rule out some of those conspiracy theories.
You have uncovered evidence that Castro, along with the KGB, ordered JFK to be killed. Oswald was some how involved, exactly how we don’t know. You have KGB planted stories, but with the KGB record of lies even to their own people, how much can they be trusted? Here I have decided to limit myself to the physical evidence, my expertise, and evaluate all other claims by the physical evidence.
RO — It is apparent you are unfamiliar with the evidence and with mroe recent investigations. Using computer enhancements of the Zapruder film, Analysis Associates calculated the trajectories of the two bullets that struck Kennedy and Conally. Working backward and allowing for a margin of error, a computer then calucated a line through the entry and exit wounds. The trajectory could then be splayed into a cone. What this clearly showed was that the two shots came from behind Kennedy.
There was also another study done, “Computational ballistic analysis of the cranial shot to John F. Kennedy.” file:///C:/Users/Jeffrey/Downloads/Computational_ballistic_analysis_of_the_cranial_sh.pdf
The report concluded: “The presented simulations support the offical commission reports regarding origin and direction of the fatal head shot to John F. Kennedy. From a mechanical standpoint, based on computational simulation, JFK’s head was hit by a single bullet from the rear originating from the Texas School Book Depository. Deformation patterns regarding skull fracture and bullet jacket deformation as shown in photographs could be matched by simulation with unambiguous consistency, leaving little room for further speculation about the origin of the projectile. Simulated post-impact head motion corresponds to evidence provided by the Zapruder Film. Simulation results together with foresnic evidence exclude the sites ‘Grassy Knowll, South Knoll, and storm drain,’ as potential origins of the fatal shot.”
You need to look at everything, and read Posner’s “Case Closed.”
What I left out in my reply above is the present political use of conspiracy theories. With this I am out of my expertise, but I can’t help recognizing the present political use thereof as dangerous.
I have quoted experts to you. Please look at the references I have given.
Jeff: there’s a saying in computer simulations that if you torture the numbers hard enough, you can get them to admit to anything. What you need is experimental evidence. None, I mean absolutely none, of the experimental evidence that I have seen backs up the theory that the head shot that killed JFK came from behind. 100% of the experimental evidence that I have seen contradicts theory.
JFK was hit by three shots, not one. Two from in front, one in the back. The Zapruder film shows JFK reacting to the wound in the throat when he came out from behind the billboard. The third shot from in front is what killed him.
Now you have four bullets to account for, three that hit JFK, the fourth one that hit Conally.
You are digging yourself into a deeper hole.
Don’t come to me with computer simulations that can be rigged to say anything. Bring out experimental evidence that contradict what I have seen so far. Don’t forget that you have already linked to some videos of experiments that have serious flaws as far as evidence for theory.
There is no credible evidence that three shots hit President Kennedy and a fourth hit the Texas governor. Please site credible sources if you are going to continue with this. I cannot respond to outlandish claims coming out of thin air.
What value are “experts” when they contradict evidence?
On another issue, look at how wrong the “experts” were concerning industrialization of the CCP, the “collapse of communism” and other issues that we discuss here. They still say that Putin wants only part of Ukraine and the CCP will be satisfied with Taiwan. Look at the evidence! The CCP has been talking about Lebensraum for years, and Taiwan isn’t it. Putin is talking about reconstituting the Soviet empire, which includes Poland, the Baltic states, Hungary, and other countries previously enslaved under Soviet rule. The evidence is there. World War III has already started, and there’s a good chance that we’ll lose. I at least will go down fighting. What good are the “experts”?
I have learned to distrust the “experts”.
Be careful. You are approaching epistemological nihilism.
Jeff, you want evidence? First of all, you have provided no evidence other than computer simulations which can be rigged to say anything and the statements of “experts”.
I provided a link that has evidence that Oswald never fired a shot on Nov. 22, 1963. Here it is again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvgT4rvQH1g
There is a documentary “JFK: What the Doctors Saw” where the doctors in the trauma room described the wound at the front throat was an entrance wound, and the massive wound at the back of the head an exit wound. These were experienced trauma doctors who knew the difference between an entrance and exit wound, what is the possibility that they were mistaken? There are many reviews of that video and you can watch it online behind a paywall.
There is another video I watched where one of the doctors was asked to compare the drawings of the autopsy with what he had seen, his final statement was that those drawings were very different from what he had observed in the trauma room. He ended with “and I put the body in the coffin.” Should I spend the time to find that video again? If it’s still available?
The wound on the back was documented by the autopsy.
Look at the Zapruder film yourself. JFK had his hands to his throat over what the doctors identified as an entrance wound when the limousine came out from behind the billboard.
These are all physical evidences. Do you want more?
All of these are consistent with your revelations that Castro, with the help of the KGB, ordered the assassination. Do you have a problem with them?
“Attitude films”? — showing leftwing lawyers and other con artists braying about Oswald’s innocence? No evidence is presented. There is massive evidence in Posner’s book, which you will but read, and I do not have the time to write it out for you.
Am I approaching epistemological nihilism? Or as I was taught at the university how to be a scientist?
I want to close this argument here and now. To be truthful, I didn’t want it to start.
The first step in being a scientist is, “The ‘experts’ are wrong.” Well, that’s an exaggeration. No expert is above questioning, except Darwin and Einstein. Question either of those two, and your scientific career is over. All other “experts” are fair game. I question both.
The second step is the scientific method that I was taught starts with observation. To be scientifically valid, that observation must be repeatable. Historical observation of a one-time event has its own validity. Even in history, recorded observation trumps theory.
Basically, when I approach a controversial event, I try to weed out theory from observation. All too often that leaves me with an incomplete picture, but I figure an incomplete picture is preferable to conspiracy theories. If an “expert” weighs in supported only by theory, computer modeling, and speculation, I feel free to disregard him. Wherever possible, do physical experiments, as physical experiments can catch unexpected results not anticipated by theoretical models.
Apparently you are far more persuaded by experts and theory than I.
So let’s just leave it at that.
No. I am persuaded the eye witnesses that saw the gun sticking out the sixty floor window of the School Book despository, But you will frame it how you want. So I leave off.
“Honestly, there really does have to be something wrong with RFK Jr’s brain”
Amusing thing about that, 13 years ago RFK Jr. went to see a doctor to check up some neurological issues he was having. They eventually found that he actually had a tapeworm that invaded his brain 🧠.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/politics/rfk-jr-parastic-worm-brain/index.html
I wonder if RFK junior even knows his dad was trying to kill Castro, and if so, how he thinks about that.
Good question.
RFK Jr strikes me as a person agitpropping the kind of doom and gloom societal anguish that wrecked the Roman empire. Trump has made huge mistakes with the vaccine, but his language was one of optimism in scientific discovery and faith in America allowing to find a solution to the virus. RFK Jr’s demoralizing tack is quite the opposite even if he made a more cogent argument.
Let us remember that materialist dialectic could be summarized as having the right conclusion but imposing them in demoralizing ways, or agitating for the wrong headed policies using “very reasonable conversation and rational dialogue”…
Why would they be able to connect the dots? There is not a single large authority out there that seriously contests the KGB disinformation campaign regarding JFK. One must dig like a badger and find extremely obscure and hard to find sources to learn the Soviet connections to Oswald and the subsequent disinfo campaign.
Pacepa’s book about Oswald being KGB is on Amazon.
@melhollier: that’s funny how two people can watch the same documentary and draw different conclusions. My conclusion was their evidence showed a very strong Cuba connection to Kennedy’s assassination. It wasn’t trying to prove Oswald was the only gunman, only that he had direct connections to Communist Cuba.
I have seen other evidence that shows the bullet that killed Kennedy came from the front and exited the rear of his head. That presupposes at least one other man involved.
Hey Jeff, I read your previous blog on your interview w/ Wang (I also watched your recent talk with Nevin) on China’s future war on East Asia and America.
Is there any crucial information from Wang on the communist regimes in Indochina possibly cooperating with China in any way?
Not from him, no.
Southeast Asia is too engimatic for us to see anything new because they’re likely being prepared as reinforcement for One Clenched Fist campaigns. However, there are signs that Vietnam will participate with China and Russia on the One Clenched Fist soon.
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/05/vietnams-political-turmoil-reveals-turn-towards-china-and-away-west
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-05-10/vietnam-was-key-to-china-plus-one-now-politics-might-make-it-a-big-minus-lw0t0qem
https://apnews.com/article/vietnam-arrest-lawyer-trade-tariffs-washington-1aab0e4822f7ec37aeb5a779ae968791
Jeff, I thought you and your readers might appreciate this story about the TET offensive. I am quoting from Thomas Ricks’s book The generals.
As you probably know, the Viet Cong had intended to assassinate “the South Vietnamese president, the American ambassador, and various chiefs of police and intelligence organizations. All these efforts failed.
Some were almost successful. Another specialized unit was sent to take over the government radio station. The infiltrators arrived at 3 AM, dressed in South Vietnamese police. A guard asked who they were. Reinforcement, they told him. None had been requested, he replied. They shot him. A platoon of genuine South Vietnamese airborne troops on duty on the station roof was wiped out by Viet Cong machine gunners from an overlooking apartment building. The attackers then escorted a radio technician trained to operate the transmitting gear into the station. They brought with them topes to play, which would announce that the people had risen and liberated the capital. What they did not know was that the station’s director had instructed that, in the event of an attack, the station would be taken off the air, to be replaced by a remote station–which turned out to have on hand only “Viennese waltzes, the Beatles, the ROlling Stones, and Vietnamese martial music. The Communist tapes were never broadcast. At 10am, the surviving Viet Cong fighters blew up the station and themselves.” (pp 286-287)
The station director was my father.
Interesting!
He was a smart man!
Yes, he was smart but he was a humble man. At the time of these events, I was 8 years old. After my parents died, I inherited all of Dad’s letters from his year in Vietnam. On the day of TET, he wrote my mother three brief letters assuring her he was fine. In one he included a diagram of the car bomb that tried to blow up the station, but he did not tell the story that I quoted here. I learned this story by being part of a book club on American History that was reading Thomas Ricks’s book. Imagine my surprise when I came across this passage I quoted.
I can’t imagine it. Not only because you were reading of valorous deeds performed and realized it was your father, but also because he outfoxed the supposedly ultimate foxes, i.e. the Marxist foes who had devoted much time and attention to their plans.
Jeff mentioned in the four Anti-Communists’ discussion the other day, that the Communists’ plans primarily visualize themselves as the attacker and not being attacked.
Even though they were still the attackers of the radio station, they suffered a major setback in that operation because of one alert, thinking American.
Thank you for sharing this anecdote. It encourages me.
One man stopped them from disseminating lies and propaganda to what, all of South Vietnam really.
There are so many stories, and so many lies, about the Vietnam War. There is a beautiful little book written by Colonel John L. Cook, titled “The Advisor.” I highly recommend it. He was an young lieutenant assigned to local villages struggling against the Vietcong. He was determined to learn from the local people, and do his best to support them with U.S. resources. Most officers did not want anything to do with this kind of assignment, because there was danger in it. Many assigned to villages simply avoided doing much and wrote reports. Captian Cook felt compassion for the Vietnamese suffering under the Vietcong, so he went out and worked with them to stop murders and kidnappings. He was greatly honored by the local Vietnamese people, and developed a great affection for them. The book is full of insights about the severely misguided notions of American professors and government experts who imagined the Vietcong represented some kind of peasant uprising — or popular movement without South Vietnam. The abandonment of Vietnam by American leftists was a great tragedy and completely unnecessary. The communists should never have won that war.
In some ways, my dad’s experience and foresight is an example of what Jeff is discussing in this essay.
Yes.
What a story! Truly a father to be proud of!
Thank you.
Jeff,
I have an article idea for you. I will not be offended at all if you don’t like it, or don’t think it would work, but I thought I should tell you. Please don’t take offense. I like to write, too, and sometimes readers can have good ideas. Some times their ideas are unworkable, unrealistic, or unappealing (maybe this is one of those). but maybe it will spawn a better idea.
Here it is:
The headline could be something like, “If You Oppose Funding Ukraine, Read This.” My thinking is make the headline say something that the audience will agree with.
The sub-head could be written like a Letter to the American People from J.R. Nyquist, author of the Origins of the Fourth World War.
The letter would start out by saying, we have been lied to about Ukraine, but not the way that one might think. Next debunk the Russia/Ukraine myths starting with the money question. Then write about Putin’s (and his predecessors) true objectives and expose his (their) lies.
I know you have already written this argument untold numbers of times, but I am suggesting that you write for an online/print publication whose readers are “follow the money” types and are Republicans who lean towards Russia.
The excerpt between Yeltsin and Clinton is so compelling it should be included in this composition.
Finally mention you have hosted a podcast with Alex, Jimmy, Jean Robin, or Trevor as you regularly do and invite the readers to listen and include the link.
By the way, I hope you all keep the Anti-Communist panel discussion going. It was fantastic.
Okay, I need to make my head spin some more. Going to listen to you and Alex on the Kennedy assassination.
It is one way to get some readers to read the arguments. I will have to think on it.
Seeing her proposal, I think it needs to be written. It won’t sway the utter idiots sold out as Putin tools, but it would open the eyes of some.
About Vietnam – the Vietnamese president who was Catholic, Diem NGO was assassinated by the communists, and then his brother, Pierre Martin Ngo Dinh Thuc who was also Archbishop, was already in Europe and the only one who survived the whole ordeal, as the rest of his family, including his brother the president and another brother who was the chief of the Vietnamese police, were all murdered by the communists.
But the interesting part is that this Archbishop Ngo is (was) a very suspicious person.
There is even suspicion by some that he may have been communist plant and not the actual Archbishop, because of his deeds advancing 2 contradicting causes within the Catholic Church, which in fact he did, both in fact heretical. The details are immaterial to this posting, but they are very serious facts with far reaching consequences.
It may have been that they, the communists murdered the true Archbishop Thuc Ngo and installed the impostor to cause the harm which he did, before he died in NYC of old age.
As Vietnam was French before its independence, it was a Catholic country and with very nice people, and so today the country is ruined in the sense of the spiritual welfare of the souls, just like any other country that have fallen into the hands of these atheistic communist criminals (under strict discipline and orders from the Kremlin).
This article is quite remarkable. I do not remember an article like this in recent memory that describes such detail Russia’s plans for physical attacks on European countries, perhaps others can confirm their recollection?
The craziest part is all the future Russian sabotage operations are framed as “because of the Ukraine war,” an insane, deadly miscalculation. Similar to the Taiwan pretext, blinding the targets of Communism as to the true desired scope of their enemies’ plans.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna147178
Yes. Russia is engaged in warfare across the board. People like to call this “unrestricted warfare.” The Russian communists have always waged such a war, from 1917 to the present. It never has changed.