After the election victory of Donald Trump a new day has dawned. Things are about to change. Also, I am moving to another state. Movers are at the door. No time to write just now. But I did have time for a podcast with Johnny, Jimmy and Trevor.

Support the site (help keep us going)
JRNyquist.blog
$15.00
176 responses to “Johnny Anderson Podcast with Jimmy and Trevor Loudon”
So now you are predicting Trump Willi pardon Hunter Biden.
———
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/?s=trump+pardon+hunter+biden
You made the prediction and your link does have Trump saying he’s going to pardon Biden. Give a quote. Not rumors.
DOES NOT HAVE
You have to go back and read what exactly was said – the term “Wait till Trump pardons Hunter Biden” was used – nobody says he already did. But it is a very bad public policy to advertise his intentions in regards to this clearly criminal person and to pervert justice this way.
It probably serves as a sort of demoralizing item also. In terms of justice it is a wrong and absolutely abominable thing to suggest that he will consider pardoning him. It makes a very impression on the public and loss of trust, and this AFTER the won elections !
Well where is a quote from Trump saying anything about pardoning HB? I want to hear or see him saying it. I can’t find it.
Bad link, this one is better, read the bottom quote:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/trump-reveals-whether-not-he-would-pardon-hunter/
EXCERPT:
In June, Hunter Biden was found guilty of three felony gun charges. A few months later, he pleaded guilty to federal tax offenses that amounted to three felonies and six misdemeanors.
“You’ve talked about wanting to unify the country if you’re elected,” Melugin began. “If you are president again, in the name of unity, would you consider pardoning Hunter Biden?”
“Well, I wouldn’t do anything that would be overt in terms of Hunter,” Trump replied. “It’s a sad situation.”
Trump explained that the Biden administration has used the “department of injustice” to go after him, because he is a political opponent.
“And it has never been done in this country,” Trump pointed out.
“I don’t wanna do that,” he said. “It’s so bad for the country.”
Regarding Hunter Biden, Trump concluded, “I wouldn’t take it off the books.”
“See, unlike Joe Biden, despite what they’ve done to me, where they’ve gone after me so viciously … And Hunter’s a bad boy,” he continued. “But I happen to think it’s very bad for our country.”
He shouldn’t be playing with the public this way, but answer straight forward – justice will be served. So he has opened the door for “considering” and that is truly bad. So to suggest that he may actually do it is not opposed to what he has said, he shouldn’t be making these kind of statements at all.
You are right he shouldn’t be.
We will see. For the record, he doesn’t say he’s going to. You said ” wait until he pardons HB.” Be a little more careful.
For the sake of the truth – you are taking it little but out of context, as it was not meant that he will actually do it for sure, but that the possibility of it, since he has done these other things “to unite the country etc.”, the possibility is still there.
Melania Trump – no evidence or indication of anything.
Same kind of profession as Ivana – a fashion model. Nothing else apparent. There is probably no need for anything, except for secrecy, the plan is already devised, they have to maintain the status quo of it.
The ONLY thing that one would notice is that as a so called Catholic she has no problem with abortion, per her recently published book, which was reported in the news, and this is excommunicable offence in accordance of the 1917 Code of Canon Law. That is all that is visible. Times are very evil, that is the bottom line. God is the only hope and comfort, to those who are truly His.
*has*
https://youtu.be/SPbFXhWF_00
Good points of how this has to be cleaned up, yesterday was too late.
This person is not Catholic, she is excommunicated and daughter of communist sympathizer (at least to say) and the whole video is of interest.
Until there is somebody with more guts and the will to clear out of the important positions this kind of communist propaganda spewing people there will be no peace nor rest nor security.
Trump is not the right choice, but unfortunately the other choice, the female nonsense (with Marxist-Leninist ideas) was far worse.
One step back, two forward from now on…they know how to do it and will attempt again – unless they are all brought under charges of communist subversion and treason…and there is no indication that Trump will do it, as to him “it is bad for the country…”
There are some people in the financial world (ex: Henrik Zeberg) on twitter that are talking about a euphoric blow-off top and crash in the stock market. From what I’ve gathered, this would be followed by a deflationary bust, record QE and money printing, record double-digit inflation and the introduction of CBDCs and universal basic income. This would hypothetically all be done under Trump, which wouldn’t be the first time he pushed the enemy’s agenda on the US population (ex: vaccines). I figured this would completely destroy all faith in him and cause widespread demoralization. This would be a great way to turn the population against him since he also won the popular vote. Thoughts?
The communists have been dreaming about this for decades. Very hard to trigger.
I was just told that a person I know lives next door to a man with a cyber security business. He was working on a case for the FBI and he called his wife and told her in code to get out of the house. It turns out that he was hacking into a group and they found out and threatened his family. Apparently, the FBI has been paying this group ransom money not to kill our people. I now wonder when people ask where all our tax dollars are going it may be going to pay groups and countries not to kill us all. This is probably nothing new to people on this blog but I have never known anyone involved in this kind of thing.
Something from about 24 years ago from Mr. Kenneth R. Timmerman:
https://www.wnd.com/2000/06/4135/
QUOTE:
When the United States received the first reports about the existence of a secret SS-23 force in September 1991, “it sent an electric shock through the intelligence community,” a former intelligence analyst told WND. “The realization that the Soviets had a secret nuclear missile force undermined all our premises about arms control.”
There had long been a debate about the actual size of the Soviet nuclear force, because of large numbers of non-deployed missiles and warheads the Soviets were known to keep in reserve.
“Here was a real, clandestine missile force — something the Soviets were trying to hide from us,” the analyst said. “It risked undermining every arms control treaty we had ever signed with them.”
———-
And another one – for the young people reading this, so that they know the truth – and see if Trump will still try to start nuclear disarmament talks with the KGB criminals from the Kremlin:
QUOTE (article from 2000 AD !!!):
Today, Russia may be conducting nuclear deception on a far vaster scale beneath Yamantau Mountain, where it has dug out a gigantic underground military complex designed to withstand a sustained nuclear assault. U.S. intelligence sources tell WorldNetDaily that the Yamantau complex is but one of some 200 secret deep underground nuclear war-fighting sites in Russia, many of which have been significantly upgraded over the past six years at a cost of billions of dollars.
https://www.wnd.com/2000/06/4137/
—————
So then when you hear Mr. Trump speaking about his intent to have yet another such like useless treaty with the Bolsheviks, these are the facts 24 years ago, and Bill Gertz also mentioned this subject before.
And so how can somebody as Tulsi Gabbard deal with this subject, per Trump appointment ?
Trump should be saying that the US needs to build rapidly extensive number of ICBM, warheads and laser and such like defenses, and prepare for war and communist revolution. Arrest the traitors democrats…don’t let them get away.
I find it interesting that Tulsi Gabbard says she’s a “hawk” when it comes to terrorism [the red herring for our military for the past 23 years], but a “dove” when it comes to the wars that actually matter [against the communists]. Sounds like the perfect Soviet distinguishing feature.
I’m glad to see in the news that the intel agencies are “alarmed” by her nomination. An article I saw on the Atlantic’s website sounded like it could have been authored by Trevor Loudon!
If you have a chance, could you link the article you mentioned?
Sure! Here are a couple. It may have been the first one I’m remembering, because I can’t access the Atlantic article anymore:
https://time.com/7176696/gabbard-russia-connection-trump-intelligence/
https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/
Doubtful she can be confirmed.
AGAIN – and not to sound truly negative, but what can one think of this following development – new FBI director appointment by Trump:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/never-trump-mike-rogers-fbi-director-sen-rand/
Why is Rogers bad? The fact that he does not exactly understand what we understand? We have to allow for the possibility that everyone will understand the truth eventually.
Who cares what Senator Rand Paul thinks? He’s a pacifist to the extreme.
Rand Paul’s father, Ron Paul, used to (and may still) make regular appearances on RT. If Rand thinks Mike Rogers is a bad choice, he may actually be a good choice! Rogers has a B+ on the site, Republicans for Ukraine:
https://gopforukraine.com/legislator/mike-rogers/
The Mike Rogers you posted is from Alabama. Trumps Mike Rogers is from Michigan.
Oh gosh, I forgot there were two. Thanks for the catch. Looks like the other one isn’t on that site.
Found this info on Mike Rogers (R-Mich). Sounds like at the very least he understands that China, Russia and Iran are our enemies. I’m not sure the same could be said for Rand Paul (about Russia at least). On domestic issues Rogers sounds mainline conservative. Definitely not alt-right like Paul. Hopefully he’ll be a good pick:
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/24/elissa-slotkin-mike-rogers-abortion-electric-vehicles-china-israel-gaza-taiwan-immigration-tariffs/75809079007/
He sounds acceptable.
It is not so much what Rand Paul thinks BUT whether that is the right appointment for FBI director, which this person was part of the FBI before, which the article mentions, and so he was more or less part of the problem….you need an outsider for the FBI to clean it up, OR completely terminate that KGB penetrated agency, to get rid of all the communists that are in it now.
Dear Ma’am, you need to think strategically for the purpose of defeating communism, not so much what the rest of the blind people in America think – this appointment will not solve the problem.
Trump should have picker the FBI deputy director Terry Turchie, this would have been much better choice, he knows that communists are inside the FBI, he wrote a book about it too. Trump doesn’t appoint such people because he doesn’t want to do anything that truly needs to be done…it is truly this way, the status quo versus true justice and the right policy.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/merrick-garland-recommend-approval-ag-search-warrant-unabombers-cabin-former-fbi-official
When you have people who purposely maintain the wrong policy and will protect it at the cost of that the communists will continue their subversion and evils, then you have a major disaster on your hands.
Forget what Rand Paul says, that is not the point, but the appointment of Rogers itself. If Trump is one of them, then he is protecting, by such bad appointments, the communist infiltration status quo ! The Kremlin is very happy about such bad appointments because the assets will remain where they are, at least the sleepers – even if Rogers fires some of the main brass culprits, there is always the replacements inside already to take the positions and continue the same policies and evils – this is how the KGB operates.
Watch this important video (to the end that is) – that tells it all. He says that the FBI needs to be cleaned up and why.
https://youtu.be/kBBKduPvyQ8
This is the right policy, and needs to be done all over the US government, and Trump is NOT bringing in such people who will do it, he will not clean up all the communist infiltrators, such people (with the exception perhaps of Gaetz – which remains to be seen but it is more hopeful) such people will just continue the progress of the government towards communist subversion finalized…
Possibly, but not necessarily. A period of growing awareness of threats may be before us.
https://youtu.be/JLZ_eufB6U0
This is worth watching too – about the communist penetration of the FBI – and this is why Trump is so much under suspicion because he will not appoint the right people to clean it up – or, he will not terminate that KGB penetrated agencies and start over with the true people, not communist sleepers again – this is why it needs to be done – yesterday.
@Concerned, thank you for the clarification. Everything you said makes perfect sense. Thanks also for sending these videos. I’ll watch them here in a bit.
Of course, none of our elections solve the problem insofar as the conservative and MAGA mainstream misunderstand the problem at hand. It is not that these people are bad. No. They are blind. The question is how do we help them see?
I apologize for the typos and not the best clarity. And, I realized Nixon was v.p., so he was not meeting Khruschev as the U S. head of state, but that’s really of no consequence. He was representing America.
I’m very tired, and going to sleep. Hopefully, there’s some hope for America, but I’m inclined to agree with CONCERNED- it doesn’t look very good.
Good night.
Hope for America *with the election of Trump*, I meant. There’s yet hope if we will return to our foundations, and the righteousness which exalts nations, regardless of who’s in the White House.
Amen
Mr. Nyquist,
When Ukraine President Zelensky spoke about the possibility of Ukraine obtaining nuclear weapons for use in its existential battle with Russia the press dismissed Zelensky as blowing smoke and wandering off the reservation.
The press now reports that President Putin and Moscow may have 6 months to prepare for Air Mail, Special Delivery, Zelensky CARE packages designed to produce Russian Instant Post Toasties.
“You need to understand we face an existential challenge. If the Russians take Ukraine, millions of Ukrainians will be killed under occupation,” said Valentyn Badrak, director of the centre that produced the paper. “There are millions of us who would rather face death than go to the gulags.” Badrak is from Irpin, where occupying Russians tortured and murdered civilians, and he was hunted by troops with orders to kill him.
Mr. Nyquist do you think that desperation may push President Zelensky to choose nuclear armament as a last ditch effort to preserve what remains of Ukraine from being torn asunder by the Russian Bear?
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/11/14/ukraine-could-build-its-own-nuclear-bombs-in-months-report/
https://www.thetimes.com/world/russia-ukraine-war/article/zelensky-nuclear-weapons-bomb-0ddjrs5hw
If I were President of Ukraine, I would want nuclear weapons, and I would use them as a deterrent to any would-be conqueror. There are worse things than death — conquest by savages is among those worse things.