“The community of language gives one access to significances at which he cannot otherwise arrive.”

Richard M. Weaver

Perhaps I talked too much, but Seth has a good-natured easy-going style of interviewing. Here is an attempt to grapple with the question of why China and Russia are preparing for war, how America is being divided, and serious trouble ahead.


Quarterly Subscription (voluntary)



The Fool and His Enemy: Toward a Metaphysics of Evil: Nyquist, J.R.: 9798666501382: Amazon.com: Books

72 thoughts on “Interview With Man in America


    CCP planning major attack on USA this year: Bioweapons, cyber war, kamikaze drones and infrastructure sabotage:

    Friday, June 04, 2021 by: Mike Adams


      1. This doesn’t make sense to me. If Covid is a bioweapon, either intentionally released or opportunistically exploited after accidental release, I’d think vaccine fear/hesitancy would be exactly what our adversaries want. More people sick, more chances to mutate, less trust and revenue for our biotech companies that provide a defense via prevention/cure, etc. etc.. Besides, China already has us in the crosshairs with much of our Rx medications manufactured there. I’m actually worried a lot more about that after multiple recalls over the past few years for cancer-causing contaminants.

      2. Their objective, according to General Chi, is to kill 100-200 million Americans. You cannot do that with a virus. But you might do it with the wrong vaccine — one that alters people’s DNA.

    1. Can someone link me a schoolarly essay or interview eloborating a theory on how the vaccine can either be part of a binary weapon? Or just any good article on how it could be worse than the virus?

      1. I do not have the links handy, now, but the guy you want to check out is Dr. Peter McCullough. He has published the most peer-reviewed papers on COVID-19, and he is saying that the Vaccine is the second part of a bio-terror attack. He said this during an interview with some German podcasters. I watched it last week but do not have the link handy. Maybe some of our German-speaking friends have it handy. I think it was linked on an earlier chat.

      2. Yes, Jeff is correct. Peter McCullough has spoken out stridently with the words “bioweapon” in the last few interviews. Search BrandNewTube and here is a new one:

        McCullough is a straight arrow and orthodox medically as you can get. But his tone and words have gotten increasingly more anxious of late. Mike Adams has explained it as well. Its not the virus, the damage causing agent is the spike protein which rides on the virus. the injection is turning the bodies of those who get it into a factory laboratory for mass production, possibly even acting as a societal self-replicating innoculation (according to Adams interview with Dr Merritt). Merrit who is also a wealth of knowledge on subject–she used to be a naval orthopedic doc for 10 years—she is another straight shooter. The protein migrates into the entire body refusing to listen to what the CDC talking head experts have said. the proteins depart the injection site in the blood stream and can form bloodclots in the unfortunate and can migrate to the primary reproductive organs of the body and can directly attack the heart and brain. Its seems to be theoretically a weapon of mass depopulation–a slow killer.

        This is other site is worth bookmarking is a compilation footnoted site of all things related to the c-19 malfeasance and the vaccine and is updated daily—an amazing work of research: https://nojabforme.info/

    2. The hypothesis is given bioweapons, as they spread and while they naturally get more infectious, they tend to get far less deadly. Therefore the virus is used to push vaccines that can carry a potent and dangerous payload.

      At least that’s how I’d do it if I were tasked with achieving a devastating biological attack on a country.

    3. This is one are where we’re just going to disagree (and I’m not one to believe that debate is unhealthy, by the way). For years I’ve been noticing a pattern although I didn’t really understand what it was. However, after reading through a lot of literature on disinformation as a result of the 2016 election chaos, as well as resources on Cold War history and socialism in general, it finally struck me that some of the anti-vaccine, environmental, anti-fracking, climate change, animal rights, march against Monsanto, anti-GMO, anti-glyphosate, etc., movements might actually becoming weaponized to undermine American science, agriculture & technology which could damage our defense and economy (one has to dig, but there’s a good bit published to this effect). Yeah, maybe a bad vaccine could be weaponized and injure a lot of people – I wouldn’t trust either the Russian or Chinese shots because of allegedly missing data and the reputations for lack of transparency both governments have brought upon themselves – but I do trust Western vaccines even if I dislike the politics of some of the company shareholders. I see them as part of a line of defense against bioweapons.

      1. So, Casual Observer: did you show your support for science by taking the jab?

      2. Thalidomide, DDT, Tuskegee, Ebola et al. But this time is different. This time tge govt can be trusted.
        And Fauci is Science And Science is Fauci.

  2. Jeff, not sure if you can comment, Christian Westbrook who goes by the alias of IceAgeFarmer released 2 articles on China and crop losses. Australian Media are reporting Chinese Communist Party Officials are cracking down on independent grain analysts and their online businesses/websites to stop them from telling the truth about China’s below average crop. Both of the articles can be summed up as distressing:

    Grains analyst missing as China shuts down information on failed crop
    NSW Country Hour / By Michael Condon
    Posted ThuThursday 17 JunJune 2021 at 12:38am, updated ThuThursday 17 JunJune 2021 at 12:52am

    China’s decisions around its agricultural policy are becoming increasingly murky with news of arrests, secrecy, and claims of cover-ups.

    Independent analysts who report on China’s grains industry have reportedly been arrested and their online businesses shut down to stop them from telling the truth about the country’s below-average crop.

    Chinese officials are cracking down on independent information about grain pricing.

    There are reports that analysts working in Beijing for respected grains reporting firm Cofeed have been arrested or are under house arrest.

    Another company called JCI, based in Shanghai, also appears to have had an employee arrested.

    Information on China hard to get

    Andrew Whitelaw from Thomas Elder Markets says it is very difficult to get reliable details on what is happening in agriculture in China.

    “The market information out of China is so blatantly propaganda,” he said.

    “The only way to find out is to have someone on the ground who you know is genuinely trustworthy.”

    Mr Whitelaw says it is harder than ever now to get accurate information out of China.

    The first sign of problems with JCI and Cofeed came in April when data stopped flowing online.

    “In the course of one night, probably a month or so ago, Cofeed just stop revising data and there were reports of police tape outside their offices,” Mr Whitelaw said.

    He says that according to information he has seen online, the head of JCI is “reportedly in prison [while] the head of Cofeed, apparently, is in house arrest or in jail as well”.

    World grain prices, domestic chaos

    Nick Crundall, a senior strategist from the Australian firm Market Check, thinks the Chinese authorities probably want to allay domestic fears about supply and limit the amount they will have to pay for imported grains.

    “They don’t want the whole world to know that they need grain and they are in a bit of strife so they very closely regulate the information that is released,” he said.

    Speculation about problems with the crops in China can be a huge driver for world prices but it also has implications domestically for the government.

    “It creates all sorts of food inflation problems and them having to pay more for imported grain,” Mr Crundall said.

    “So the Chinese are very strict on going out there telling the world there are no issues.”

    Mr Whitelaw says the signals from China indicates authorities are either nervous about the harvest or worried about the supply of grain and corn.

    “They’ve said they’ve had a record harvest but they’re importing record amounts of corn, they’ve put options for corn from the US and they’re buying Australian wheat,” he said.

    “China’s gone from importing 6 million tons or less corn and that’s up to 25 million tons.

    “You just don’t import things if you don’t need to … Australia is not going to import kangaroo meat anytime soon because we have got plenty.”

    Food security a major concern
    Mr Whitelaw says grain shortages are a real concern for countries with large populations.

    He pointed to Egypt where in 2011 things got out of hand due to grain shortages.

    “The price of bread doubles and you have got riots on the streets because food prices are too high,” Mr Whitelaw said.

    “Someone famously said every country is only four meals away from anarchy.”


    Influential Chinese farm consultancy Cofeed suspends operations without explanation

    MAY 12, 2021 7:26AM EDT

    BEIJING, May 12 (Reuters) – Influential Chinese agricultural data provider Cofeed has suspended operations without explanation, leaving a gap in highly valued information on grain and oilseed supplies in the world’s biggest soybean buyer.

    The company, officially known as Beijing TianxiaLiangchang Technology Co Ltd, stopped updating its website with data and analysis on April 29.

    It has also stopped supplying daily and weekly data to Refinitiv, the financial data company, which published an advisory for clients using its Eikon platform.

    “We are still investigating the reasons for why the source has not sent this data,” the advisory says.

    Repeated calls to the mobile phones of two of its analysts this week have gone unanswered and three others also did not pick up calls. Nobody answered a company phone number listed with an old office address on its website late on Wednesday.

    Cofeed, founded in 2002, produces data on most of China’s key grains and oilseeds. Its numbers on soybean and soymeal stocks, soybean crushing volumes, crushing margins and corn pricing are widely used by traders both at home and overseas.

    The abrupt halt to Cofeed’s operations comes during a period of heightened interest in Chinese demand for global grain, after prices of Chinese corn rallied to a record during 2020, driving imports of grain to unprecedented levels.

    The company appears to have moved out of the Beijing office listed on its website last year, according to a security guard working in the building.

    It has been operating from a villa in the northern outskirts of Beijing, said a person familiar with the firm. Doors at that address had been sealed by police on April 29, Reuters found on Wednesday.

    The local police station declined to comment and referred Reuters to the Public Security Bureau in Beijing’s Changping district. The district bureau referred Reuters to the municipal PSB, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    (Reporting by Dominique Patton Editing by Tony Munroe and John Stonestreet)


    The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.


      1. No. They are having real problems. And they knew this might happen three years ago. Grand solar minimum is a known thing. They were probably caught short by last summer’s extreme weather. Lost a great deal of food production.

  3. I look forward to listening to it. I’m extremely pleased to see you getting more visibility and distribution.

      1. That’s brillo! Go Cassandra ! Hopefully enough will become four armed from your forewarning to make a difference.

  4. Jeff, what do you think of the whole John McAfee supposed suicide thing and about the things he used to say in public?

    1. It is interesting that a bigshot cyber security guy should die under such circumstances. I do not understand the tax evasion/fraud case against him, so I cannot comment on his legal troubles. His death at this juncture is curious.

      1. MacAfee was a proud troll who was about to face a lifetime of legal trouble in the US. He took the troll’s way out. Don’t read into it.

  5. Could not China be playing up GSM in order to cover for food hoarding? I’m on board with GSM. Thanks for Dr. Peter McCullough reference.

    1. No. They are not faking their food problems. Not exactly. This is a complicated issue. Of course, they have large stockpiles of food for war purposes. But they do not want to use up those granaries in peacetime. In theory they are supposed to maintain a 5-year supply of food. But it is doubtful they could ever accumulate so much. Last year, with the massive crop failures, they discovered that food stockpiles had not been properly maintained. When this got out they rushed to cover it up. We do not know the extent of the problem. But there was a crackdown on information about their food reserves. An actual war requires large stockpiles for them. It is not a question of China starving now. That is not what I am saying. Food is a strategic asset to them. If Chiba’s stored food is below a certain level, then they cannot go to war without risking mass starvation. War means self-reliance in terms of food. They must have enormous stockpiles to even contemplate war. If the war drags on or their reserves fail, then half of China starves. Do you see their problem?

      1. Certainly. And I’m sure we no idea on the real numbers. Thanks again

  6. Jeff,
    Do you have any understanding on what the chinese plan to do with the civilian population of the United States upon invasion? Do they plan to use us as assets / slaves, or is it extermination?

    1. Chi Haotian, China’s defense minister twenty years ago, indicated the plan was genocidal — exterminate most of the population here. His speech is reproduced on the second page of this blog (if you count from the first page back in 2019).

  7. Ah. I did read his statements before. The issue that bothered me was spike proteins. According to that Salk study everyone was referencing in defense of not getting vacced, one if researchs on it says that the hamsters used for testing that demonstrated hemorrhage had a million times more spike proteins than the actual vaccine produces. He’s saying it’s safe.

    Claim 4 (Misleading and Unsupported):
    “We know that the vaccine technology produces the dangerous spike protein […] which damages blood vessels and causes blood clotting”

    Vaccines work by exposing a person to a dead or weakened pathogen (disease-causing microorganism), or a part of the pathogen, like one of its proteins. This trains the person’s immune system to be ready to recognize and fight off the actual microorganism in a future encounter.

    The claim that the spike protein generated by the COVID-19 vaccines poses a danger to people may be based—incorrectly as we will see—on recently published studies, as documented here by David Gorski, a professor of surgery at Wayne State University and an editor at Science-Based Medicine.

    In one study by the Salk Institute, scientists engineered a pseudovirus that carried the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on its surface[7]. Gorski described pseudoviruses as “a construct that has the external proteins of the virus of interest”. Pseudoviruses don’t contain the actual virus and cannot replicate. This allows scientists to produce models that carry the same external characteristics of the virus they wish to study, without having to run the safety risks associated with studying the virus itself. The study reported that hamsters infected with the pseudovirus had signs of inflammation in the lungs.

    But as one of the study’s senior authors Uri Manor pointed out on Twitter, the findings of the study can’t be extrapolated to the spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccines. This is because the amount of spike protein produced by vaccines is far less than the spike protein present in the hamsters.

    Furthermore, as Gorski pointed out, the study itself stated that the findings suggest vaccines would protect people from injury, not cause it:

    “[The results suggest] that vaccination-generated antibody […] against [spike] protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits [spike] protein imposed endothelial injury.”

    Endothelial cells are cells that line the inner walls of blood vessels. This contradicts McCullough’s claim that the spike protein from the vaccines would damage blood vessels.

    Another study examined blood samples from people who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine and detected spike protein in 11 out of 13 vaccinated people[8]. However, this study also doesn’t provide evidence that the spike protein from vaccines causes damage, since the levels of spike protein detected were infinitesimal. Specifically, they were in the realm of picograms per milliliter. Gorski put this in perspective:

    “That’s 10-12 grams/milliliter. What was the concentration used by Manor’s lab again? Oh, yes, 4 micrograms/milliliter. One microgram is 10-6 grams, or one million-fold more than one picogram!”

    Overall, McCullough’s claim that vaccine-induced spike protein poses a danger to people isn’t substantiated by evidence. In fact, the available evidence contradicts his claim.

  8. I need to correct myself. This Dr. Gorksi at Salk is saying the Vaccine is safe. Not Dr. McColluugh. It’s clearly killing people, whatever the levels of spike protein. All that post was from that link. I’m not getting vaccinated, both parents did a month or so ago and no ill effects knock on wood. Sister is an RN, vaccinated and miscarriaged early in her pregnancy. Since I’m not supposed to know about the miscarriage I can’t ask her about it. I can only speculate. There were doctors saying that the spike proteins attack in both the virus and the vaccine could possibly attack the placenta and testes. The question is if the vaccine is actually causeing as many deaths as Dr. McColluugh is claiming and if we will even get a true accounting. I’m guessing no. Apparently the Deltal varriant in Isreal is infecting vaccinated people. https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-50-of-delta-variant-cases-vaccinated-severe-2021-6 “Levy told the state broadcaster Kan Bet that about 40% to 50% of new cases appeared to be people who had been vaccinated, Haaretz reported. He did not appear to specify a time frame for the new cases.”

    So it’s the gift that keeps giving.

  9. Bedlam:

    Please note these alleged COVID treatments DO NOT MEET the MEDICAL DEFINITION of a “VACCINE” as they DO NOT PREVENT INFECTION. Urge you to go to the websites of the suppliers and read the official press releases where this is clearly stated.


    Dr. Robert Malone discusses vaccine risks after YouTube deletes podcast

    Jun. 24, 2021 – 4:29 -MIN VIDEO:

    mRNA expert sounds off on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’


    ‘The government is not being transparent about the risks’: Inventor of MRNA technology says people should not be forced to take experimental COVID vaccines because risks aren’t known and under 18s and those who’ve had virus shouldn’t take it

    Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology that’s used in the COVID vaccine, said young adults and teens shouldn’t be forced to get the vaccine
    He told Fox’s Tucker Carlson that there isn’t enough risk-benefit analysis data for that age group
    Earlier today, a CDC advisory group said there is a ‘likely link’ between rare cases of heart inflammation in that age group and the COVID-19 vaccine

    The inventor of mRNA technology said ‘the government is not being transparent about the risks’ of the COVID-19 vaccine after YouTube deleted a video where he discussed potential risks for young adults and teens. Dr. Robert Malone, who invented the mRNA technology that’s now being used in the COVID-19 vaccine, told Fox’s Tucker Carlson on Wednesday night that there isn’t enough data about the risks for these age groups and doesn’t believe they should be forced to get vaccinated.’I don’t think the benefits outweigh the risks in that cohort,’ said Malone, referring to people in the 18 to 22 age bracket, ‘but unfortunately the risk-benefit analysis is not being done.”My concern is I know there are risks but we don’t have access to the data,’ Malone said. ‘And so, I am of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines.’….MORE:

    Vaccine Remorse hits America

    Tuesday, June 22, 2021 by: S.D. Wells

    Spike proteins cleave off (break away from) the cell, and leave the injection site, traveling throughout your body and brain, counter to what the dirty vaccine manufacturers, the corrupt FDA and their co-conspirators at the CDC are telling everybody. If you want to understand the science, the real science, behind mRNA, listen to the scientist who MADE it, who discovered it, pioneered it, and is blowing the whistle on it right now. Get ready to get “red pilled” on the truth about these dirty, plandemic Covid-19 inoculations:

    Dr. Robert Malone, Inventor of mRNA
    Dr. Bret Weinstein, PhD, Evolutionary Biology
    Steve Kirsch, MIT trained Engineer;Serial Entrepreneur

    15 Min Video Clip:

    Are the Covid-19 vaccines “safe and effective”?

    Steve Kirsch
    JUNE 16, 2021

    Are there any risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized on an emergency use basis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)? Presently three genetic-based vaccines have been authorized via the emergency order including two mRNA-based vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech) as well as the adenovirus-based Johnson and Johnson product. Developed at historical speed under Operation Warp Speed, the mRNA-based technology foretells enormous implications for healthcare including the prospect of vaccines for cancer. An amazing research prowess has unfolded in response to the COVID-19 pandemic heralding profound breakthroughs that’ll benefit society for years to come. Governmental authorities have declared the vaccines both safe and effective and as TrialSIte recently reported based on a change of law that waives the need for informed consent with investigational products. Both the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and FDA have declared that the risk-benefit analyses strongly indicate the risks of not getting a vaccination outweigh any risk of vaccination. They argue that the risks associated with COVID-19 are materially greater. Moreover, health authorities are on record that there is absolutely no correlation associated with the COVID-19 vaccines to any deaths as indicated by the CDC declaration. But have they sufficiently probed and pursued granular investigation into their own data? Have they undertaken the comprehensive analyses associated with what in the CDC VAERS is now close to 6,000 deaths. Are all of these unrelated to the vaccines? Steve Kirsch, the founder and executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF), a regular contributor to the TrialSite recently conducted a more systematic and thorough analysis of the VAERS and CDC adverse event and death numbers reported in conjunction with the COVID-19 vaccines. The results are disturbing to say the least. TrialSite offers no opinion here other than the presentation of the highly successful MIT-trained engineer who has invested millions of his own funds into early stage treatment options targeting COVID-19. What follows is a summary of his deep dive into VAERS presented in this video.


  10. Jeff, not sure if you can comment, I spent the afternoon talking with a New Zealand Defense Force member about the Grand Solar Minimum and the food shortage in China and the implications it could have on the Southern Hemisphere, suffice to say it was met with denial, shock and disbelief.

  11. How do you see the China demographic problem along with their food demand problem? If memory serves me right, you were talking in one of the hangouts with Cliff Kincaid that the CCP can reap the benefits from their virus that kills mostly the elderly folk that became a problem since their birth rate is low right now and their population pyramid is becoming or already is top heavy, but couldn’t a steep decline in their population numbers help to alleviate how they badly depend on other countries for food?

    It seems the CCP really wants more babies though via policies, this video reports that some chinese couples want zero kids in recent times. Seems like the population became even stricter than the party itself and the communist population control plan backfired tremendously.

    1. The Chinese want more babies because they cannot allow their culture to develop a negative attitude toward raising children as happened in the West. The Chinese need more soldiers as they will lose many. And they hope to take the land they need. In effect, they have learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. (And Covid)

  12. Dear Jeff, you, probably, remember the equally heroic as tragic figure from the recent Russian past, General Alexander Lebed. In my humble opinion Lebed was the firs, the last and Russia’s only chance for the relatively non corrupt, honest leadership. And as such, he, obviously, stood no chance.
    Lebed came to prominence when he successfully negotiated the peace deal between Russia and Chechnya and then between Moldova and Transnistria. He was also very courageous and outspoken critic of the Russia establishemnt.
    He also served briefly as Boris Jeltsin’s national Security Advisor.
    During his last press conference Lebed made a statement that there were 120 (if I remember well) suitcase size nuclear bombs missing from the inventory.
    The next day, Putin, who at that time was the Chief of FSB warned Lebed that if he continues to talk about that subject, he willbe accused of revealing the state’s secrets.
    Shortly later, Lebed resigned and moved to Krasnoyarsk region where he became it’s governor.
    Three or four years later he died in the copter crash, which meant, of course, that he was murdered.
    There are two possibilities related to Lebed’s statement:
    One is that the FSB under the instruction from Putin himself has prepared a bogus report that looked perfectly genuine and Lebed fell for it. Later, he was, probably, presented with a real report so he realized that he was duped, humiliated and resigned.
    The second possibility is that the original report was genuine and the nukes have really been stolen, by the KGB, of course and are being kept to use clandestinely against Russia’s enemies and America in particular.
    Lebed himself was murdered because he knew too much or because he was still very popular, signalled his wish to fight for the presidential office and thus presented a clear and present danger to Putin’s own plans to become Russian president.
    I strongly believe that this case is extremely relevant to the security of America and her allies so what is your opinion on that?
    Regards – Bogdan from EUNUCHALIA.

  13. After listening to your interview I came away with the following. “We need to unify.” That’s not going to happen, Jeff. There was a time when English was a universal business language and a unifying language within America. True immigrants to America quickly learned English enough to operate effectively. The vast majority of our population believed in America’s moral principles and founding documents. Yes we have always had fifth columnists; but they were somewhat kept in check. Even though there was an underlying current of unrest throughout the country, it wasn’t until roughly 1965 that a concerted effort was made to overthrow our way of life. The evolving chaos opened all the doors to subversive and nefarious activities. Instead of a united America we began splitting. It wasn’t readily apparent for about three decades due to the abundance of jobs and the standard of living. Once major companies began to merge in an effort to break unions and increase corporate profit, the handwriting was on the wall. This was followed by outsourcing manufacturing and importing labor. Technology only exasperated the situation. The influx of foreigners over the past thirty years have no desire to be American even though many claim citizenship. And those who are not, and may not become, citizens do not even desire to associate with Americans. Couple that with a couple generations who have been indoctrinated and are, for the most part, chaff carried along by the wind and you have a fractured, unstable nation slowly dying on the vine. We have reached a point where families are divided as to what America is and should be. The true patriots are maybe 60/70 % above the age of sixty who are frustrated because of inaction to resolve our plight. Many believe there is no viable solution yet are still willing to risk life and limb trying. I can give you reasons why it is a no win situation; but I won’t. Even so, that does not stop us from wanting to try if given the opportunity. In any case, I see no unification. I have other thoughts on the matter that cannot be presented here out of respect for your site.

    1. I understand your point. But you must understand that we do not have a choice. We must unify or die. There is no evading this fact. Furthermore, the threat of death helps focus the will.

      1. You and Eddie both have a point. We must unite or die, but how can those with conservative values unite with perverts and people who label them falsely as a racist because they were born white? And would the woke communists unite with those they despise? Can such opposed world views unite? I see your point, Jeff, but yet it seems an impossible goal. Do you think the very invasion would unite us as we see through the deception at that time?


      2. It does seem impossible. I think the severity of the danger could scare many folks back into a more traditional lifestyle — that they could see where this has led our nation; that is, to the brink of destruction.

      3. I often wonder what the plan is for areas like mine. Rural, deep South. A lot of us from all races get along. And treat each other respectfully. Quite a bit of folks younger than me (I’m 39) willing to work/hard working. Plenty of arable land. Would they nuke us, or send in ground troops to take the land from us? Would they kill us or try to enslave us? Many in this area would choose rather to die, I believe. Most are pretty well-armed. Some evenings I hear neighbors practicing, firing off a lot of rounds. Some evenings they hear me. What would the plan be for areas like mine, I wonder?

      4. Nuclear weapons will only be used against strategic military targets and very few economic targets. You are probably safer where you are than I am up north.

  14. Interesting interview. What is Seth,s last name? And what is his website / YouTube or Rumble channel ?

  15. Although it reveals my ignorance, I must ask: why does China have this food problem? Isn’t the country mostly rural area? If so, why can’t they just farm it? Even if big agriculture is a problem for economic reasons, can’t the rural folk just raise their own food on the land where they live? Is the land depleted or something? If so, can’t fertilizer, etc. restore it? If the Chinese can’t grow food on their own land, what makes them think they could grow it here? There’s obviously something I don’t understand going on, so please forgive what is probably a stupid-sounding question.

    1. China was flooded out last year and lost a large portion of its crops. Plus, there are 4 times as many Chinese as Americans living in a country with less arable land than we have.

      1. And were anything to happen accidentally to the infrastructure, such as the Three Gorges Dam, the disaster would be cataclysmic.

  16. Great comments on how nukes really work Jeff. Your analysis makes total sense as for tactics. Also, concerning vaccines that modify DNA, I happened to see this today. Looks like the endgame of where these vaccine scientists are taking things. We will all be GMO soon. This site doesn’t impress me because they go for sensational reports, but this one really got my attention.


  17. This push that everyone gets the jab is scientifically suspicious, especially when those that push it insist that those of us who have natural immunity (we had the disease and recovered from it) still get the jab. It’s long been known that those who recover from a viral disease are immune to that strain of the disease for life (though we may get infected with a mutation if it’s significantly different). The insistence that those with natural immunity get the jab makes the jab sound like a bioweapon.

  18. Jeff, it seems to me that if the Chinese/Russians attack now, it’s just going to provoke a huge resistance from those here in the US who are armed. If the Chinese need more food to wage war, and simultaneously have mismanaged their reserves while producing less due to the grand solar minimum, to me it seems logical for them to wait and continue with what has been working well enough for now—covertly releasing new variants of the virus, using the leftist media to pressure people into taking a dangerous vaccine, and wielding various US government agencies against the American people, especially conservatives. In this way they can continue to slowly but surely inflict great harm without provoking any sort of organized response, as there would be if they waged nuclear war or all-out invasion. It seems to me that it’s imperative for them to disarm the US population before an invasion could ever take place; otherwise the war could become their own version of Vietnam. Can you tell me why you think I’m wrong, if you believe an attack is truly imminent?

    1. I do not think you are wrong. Your thinking uses my own logic. This is why I was puzzled by my sources from the communist countries and Russia, indicating war was coming within months. My Russian source indicated that Moscow prefers a minor role in the war. Such intelligence from the bloc countries puzzled me, as my sources did not have access to the deeper reasons behind the push for war by China, but only that President Trump’s trade policies had damaged China’s position and that unrest in China had reached dangerous levels. Because of this, I am told, the COVID-19 attack was launched. This helped China with its own domestic unrest problem as well as serving to remove Trump from office because of the mail-in ballots and irresistible temptation for corrupt local officials to stuff the ballot boxes in Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta, etc.. The resulting unrest and polarization in the USA provided the communists here with an unprecedented opportunity that could backfire on China. There is also the consequences of economic breakdown leading to war. Putin’s remarks at Davos could provide the answer as to why war is coming within months; namely, that the pandemic itself could lead to a further economic breakdown in the world economy leading to a war of all against all. These were Putin’s shocking words. Also, it is possible that the Chinese see the consequences of their actions as severe — that they will suffer for what they did, and war is their only way out. Consider, as well, the question of food shortages in China. Right now China is on the brink of another “year of floods” that destroy crops with 97 rivers at or near flood stage. If they cannot continue to feed their people the biological war will intensify. In addition, if Dr. McCullough is right in saying the vaccine is attack vector 2 in a biological war, investigation of Fauci might uncover Chinese involvement in our vaccination policy. If so, war could break out at any time and China would need to act preemptively. Therefore, the normal reasoning that you and I have been using to judge the threat level may be superseded by larger events and a situation that is spiraling out of control.

  19. Even if Fauci were shown irrefutably to be receiving funds from the Chinese government, I don’t think it would lead to war, especially with Biden in power. The mainstream media are so brilliant when it comes to framing things, instilling bias and ignoring inconvenient truths altogether that I think you’re right: even if the US were being actively invaded by Chinese and Russian troops, half the country watching MSNBC and CNN might not even believe it! They might believe that it was another of Trump’s lies, or that Trump was actually behind the invasion! We’ll most likely go to war exactly when China wants war, and not a moment sooner, since international communists seem to control 90% or more of our media.

    1. War becomes inevitable when the larger relationship falls apart with recriminations and suspicions, when severe economic damage is threatened, when starvation is forecast by scientists who study the solar cycle. In war, scseries of events lead
      to a spiral downwards. Action and reaction. The media does not determine this, but may mediate it. China will decide to start the war because China wants the surprise attack advantage. But China does not dictate conditions which may force that decision.

Comments are now closed.